0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
7 просмотров1 страница
Public officers can be held liable for their actions in three ways: 1) criminally for breaches of duty owed to the public or individuals, 2) administratively for statutory or contractual violations, or breaches of duty, and 3) civilly for torts committed. Presidential immunity protects the president from most civil suits during their term, with some exceptions. The liability rules aim to ensure public officers are accountable for their official actions and duties.
Public officers can be held liable for their actions in three ways: 1) criminally for breaches of duty owed to the public or individuals, 2) administratively for statutory or contractual violations, or breaches of duty, and 3) civilly for torts committed. Presidential immunity protects the president from most civil suits during their term, with some exceptions. The liability rules aim to ensure public officers are accountable for their official actions and duties.
Public officers can be held liable for their actions in three ways: 1) criminally for breaches of duty owed to the public or individuals, 2) administratively for statutory or contractual violations, or breaches of duty, and 3) civilly for torts committed. Presidential immunity protects the president from most civil suits during their term, with some exceptions. The liability rules aim to ensure public officers are accountable for their official actions and duties.
a. Breach of Duty owing to the Public in General b. Breach of Duty Owning to a Particular Individual i. Vinzons-Chato v. Fortune Tobacco Corporation, G.R. No. 141309, 23 December 2008 B. Statutory Liability C. Liability for Contract D. Liability for Tort ii. Chavez v. Sandiganbayan, 193 SCRA 282 iii. Shauf v. Court of Appeals, 191 SCRA 713 iv. Wylie v. Rarang, 209 SCRA 357 v. Rama v. Court of Appeals, 148 SCRA 496 vi. Pilar v. Sangguniang Bayan of Dasol, Pangasinan, 128 SCRA 173 vii. Correa v. CFI of Bulacan, 92 SCRA 312 viii. Alinsugay v. Court of Appeals, 148 SCRA 521(exception) E. Presidential Immunity From Suit ix. Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. No. 146710-15, 2 March 2001 x. Forbes v. Chuoco Tiaco, 16 Phil 534 F. Three- Fold Liability Rule a. Criminal xi. Office of the Court Administrator v. Enriquez, 218 SCRA 1 xii. Mollaneda v. Umacob, G.R. No. 140128, 6 June 2001 b. Administrative a. xiii. Carpio-Morales v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 217126-27, 10 November 2015 (condonation) b. Civil