TTS-2012-DN-17, PierWell-P2 (TS), R0, Design of Well Foundation For P2 PDF

Sandeep Pattiwar
PREAMBLE
This design note has been prepared after the information received for P2 well
foundation in Dec 2011 as per following details:
The Final and Actual Tilt and Shift at Site as on Dec 2011 after cutting edge is
reached at final level, i.e. RL 14.7 m:
1. Tilt in River Flow Direction: 1 in 265 D/S

2. Shift in River flow direction: 918 mm D/S
3. Tilt in Traffic Direction: 1 in 48
4. Shift in Traffic direction: i in 48
5. Founding Level: RL 14.7 m
6. Angle of Friction: 40 degree below Scour Level
The various documents have been collected from site including the design
document, tilt and shift record, latest drawings (soft copy) and geo-technical
investigations.
Geo-technical investigation revealed that internal angle of friction, φ, has been

above 35 degree below scour level and reached upto 40 degree at founding
level. In the design the internal angle of friction has been considered 35.5
degree at top two meters below scour level and further 40 degree have been
considered uniformly up to founding level.
The well foundation is found safe for the stability in longitudinal seismic as well
transverse seismic case. The steining stresses in reinforcement are safe and
within allowable limits of Fe500.
Page 1
Page 2
Design By : KM Job: Design of Pier Well Foundation, P2, Doc No. TTS/2012/DN/17, R0
Checked By: SP Kopili Bridge. Date: Dec, 2011.
DESIGN SUMMARY
Summary Of Forces At Base Under Various Cases
Sr. Case Pmax @ base Pmin @ base Pallow. @ base

2 2
No. T/m T/m T/m2
Abutment Condition
1 Normal (LWL) 61.74 61.74 100.00
with 70R
2 Normal (LWL) 62.20 62.20 100.00
with Class A
3 Normal (HFL) 59.17 59.17 100.00
with 70R
3 Normal (HFL) 59.62 59.62 100.00
with Class A
Summary of Stresses in Well Steining
Grdae of concrete M30

Grade of Reinforcement: Fe 500
Reference Drawing: NHAI/EW/PH-III/NH37/BR-01/S-01, R1
Vertical Steel Reinforcement Percentage: 0.817%
Sr. Case Actual Allowable Actual Allowable
No. Stresses in Stresses in Stresses in Stresses in
Concrete Concrete Steel Steel
1 Normal (LWL) 18.17 100.0
with 70R (Uncracked Section)
3 Normal (HFL) 18.07 100.0
with 70R (Uncracked Section)
Note: All stresses in Kg/Cm 2
Page 3
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well
Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
Design By : KM Job: Design of Well Foundation, P2, Kopili Bridge. Doc No. TTS/2012/DN/17 R0
Checked By: SP Date: Dec, 2011.
Summary of Forces (NORMAL)
Vertical Loads
1 Load From Super Structure
Dead Load Reference
Dead load of box super structure = 676.97 ton Annexure A

Super imposed Load = 170.82 ton Annexure A
Live Load
Live load percentage considered = 100.0 %

Footpath Live Load = 23.02 ton Annexure A
Vehicular Live Load, Class 70R, 1 lane = 102.27 ton Annexure A
Vehicular Live Load, Class A, 2 lane = 129.04 ton Annexure A
(Impact factor has not been considered)
2 Piercap and Pier
Piercap and pier in HFL = 322.94 ton Annexure B

Piercap and pier in LWL = 474.36 ton Annexure B
3 Well Foundation
Foundation in HFL = 2066.15 ton Annexure C

Foundation in LWL = 2066.15 ton Annexure C
Soil wedge above the tilted well foundation = 114.83 ton Annexure C
4 Total Vertical Load
Total vertical load in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 3476.99 ton

Total vertical load in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 3628.41 ton
Total vertical load in HFL condition with Class A = 3503.76 ton
Total vertical load in LWL condition with Class A = 3655.18 ton
5 Net Vertical Load

V
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 3476.99 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 3628.41 ton
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class A = 3503.76 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class A = 3655.18 ton
Page 4
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation
for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
Moments in Longitudinal Dircetion
1 Moment From Super Structure
Dead Load + SIDL + Live Load
Moment at bearing level from super structure with 70R = 13.21 ton.m Annexure A
Moment due to braking at founding level = 1569.23 ton.m Annexure D
Moment at bearing level from super structure with class A = -35.84 ton.m Annexure A
2 From Sub Structure
Moment due to sub structure = 0.00 ton.m
3 From Foundation
Moment due to Water Current Forces = 134.69 ton.m Annexure E

Due to soil wedge resting on tilted well foundation = 234.61 ton.m Annexure C
Due to tilt and shift in longitudinal direction, HFL = 1613.17 ton.m Annexure F
Due to tilt and shift in longitudinal direction, LWL = 1717.28 ton.m Annexure F
4 Total Moment in Longitudinal Direction
Total Moment in HFL with Class 70R = 3564.91 ton.m

Total Moment in LWL with Class 70R = 3669.02 ton.m
Total Moment in HFL with Class A = 3309.72 ton.m
Total Moment in LWL with Class A = 3413.82 ton.m
Page 5
Moments inTransverse Dircetion
Moment Due to eccentricity of Deadl Load = 0.00 ton.m

Moment due to eccentricity of SIDL = 185.64 ton.m Annexure D
Moment due to eccentricity of Foothpath Live load = 84.78 ton.m Annexure D
Moment due to eccentricity of Live Load, Class 70R = 207.60 ton.m Annexure D
Moment due to eccentricity of Live Load, Class A = 203.23 ton.m Annexure D
3 From Foundation

4 Total Moment in Transverse Direction

Active and Passive Earth Pressure Annexure H
Page 6
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with 70R condition )
Summary of loads on well base
Sr. V ( H ( ML MT MR
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
1 Net Vertical Load with 70R 3628.41 3669.02 4278.70 5636.40

2 Lateral earth pressure
Active earth pressure 412.01
LL surcharge pressure 0.00
Total 3628.41 0.00 6048.41
1 Passive earth pressure 5446.95 28571.81
Check for base pressure
Well diameter at the base (Db) = 8.65 m

Area of well at base (Ab) = 58.77 m2
Section modulus (Zb) = 63.54 m2
Here, Passive relief moment at base > Active moment at base

Hence, no moment is transferred at the base of well
Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
2
= 61.74 + 0.00 = 61.74 T/m
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

2
= 61.74 - 0.00 = 61.74 T/m
2
Pallow = Allowable base pressure = 100 T/m
Here, allowable base pressure is more than the maximum developed pressure
Hence, O.K.
Page 7
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with 70 R condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3476.99 0.00 5796.68

2
Area of well at base (Ab) = 58.77 m
2
Section modulus (Zb) = 63.54 m

Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
2
= 59.17 + 0.00 = 59.17 T/m
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

2
= 59.17 - 0.00 = 59.17 T/m
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 8
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with Class A condition )
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
1 Net Vertical Load with A 3655.18 3413.82 4274.34 5470.29

Total 3655.18 0.00 5882.30


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
2
= 62.20 + 0.00 = 62.20 T/m
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

2
= 62.20 - 0.00 = 62.20 T/m
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 9
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with Class A condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
1 Net Vertical Load with A 3503.76 3309.72 4031.23 5215.84

Total 3503.76 0.00 5627.85

2
Area of well at base (Ab) = 58.77 m
2
Section modulus (Zb) = 63.54 m

Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
2
= 59.62 + 0.00 = 59.62 T/m
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

2
= 59.62 - 0.00 = 59.62 T/m
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 10
Annexure A
LOADS AND FORCES FROM SUPER STRUCTURE
Dead Load of PSC Box Girder, Left Span P2 to A2 Dead Load of PSC Box Girder, Right Span P2 to P1
C/C of span, Pier C/c = 37.810 m C/C of span, Pier C/c = 45.515 m
C/C of Bearing at Pier = 3.325 m C/C of Bearing at Pier = 3.325 m
C/C of Bearing of Super Structure = 34.485 m C/C of Bearing of Super Structure = 42.190 m
Maximum Depth of Super Structure = 2.500 m Maximum Depth of Super Structure = 2.500 m
Base width of Super Structure = 5.000 m Base width of Super Structure = 5.000 m
2
C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m2
Distance of mid section from mid span = 9.051 m Distance of mid section from mid span = 12.903 m
2
C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m2
Distance between thickened and mid span section = 4.892 m Distance between thickened and mid span section = 4.892 m
Distance of uniform thickened section = 3.900 m Distance of uniform thickened section = 3.900 m
2
C/S of slab = 3.588 m C/S of slab = 3.588 m2
Distance of uniform slab section = 1.038 m Distance of uniform slab section = 1.038 m
Weight of length considered = 37.760 m Weight of length considered = 45.465 m
3
Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m3
Weight of Box Structure = 586.74 ton Weight of Box Structure = 694.61 ton
Weight of future stressing block = 11.37 ton Weight of future stressing block = 11.37 ton
Weight of End Diaphragm = 19.38 ton Weight of End Diaphragm = 19.38 ton
Weight of intermediate Diaphragm = 5.55 ton Weight of intermediate Diaphragm = 5.55 ton
Total Weight of Box Structure = 623.04 ton Total Weight of Box Structure = 730.91 ton
Dead Load Reaction of Box Structure = 311.52 ton Dead Load Reaction of Box Structure = 365.45 ton
SIDL Load intensity = 4.10 ton/m SIDL Load intensity = 4.10 ton/m
SIDL Reaction = 77.51 ton SIDL Reaction = 93.31 ton
Total Dead Load Reaction = 389.03 ton Total Dead Load Reaction = 458.76 ton
Page 11
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
Live Load
FPLL intensity = 0.553 ton/m FPLL intensity = 0.553 ton/m

Footh Path Live Load Reaction = 10.45 ton Footh Path Live Load Reaction = 12.58 ton
70 R Wheeled (at Pier End) = 89.97 ton 70 R Wheeled (at Pier End) = 12.30 ton
No. of Lanes = 1 No. of Lanes = 1
70 R Wheeled (at Pier End) for 1 lanes = 89.97 ton 70 R Wheeled (at Pier End) for 1 lanes = 12.30 ton
70 R Wheeled (at other End) = 10.03 ton 70 R Wheeled (at other End) = 53.70 ton
70 R Wheeled (at other End) for 1 lanes = 10.03 ton 70 R Wheeled (at other End) for 1 lanes = 53.70 ton
Class A (at Pier End) = 44.30 ton Class A (at Pier End) = 20.22 ton
Class A (at Pier End) for 2 lanes = 88.60 ton Class A (at Pier End) for 2 lanes = 40.43 ton
Class A (at other End) = 11.10 ton Class A (at other End) = 23.78 ton
Class A (at other End) for 2 lanes = 22.20 ton Class A (at other End) for 2 lanes = 47.57 ton
Total DL + LL Reaction with Class 70R = 479.00 ton Total DL + LL Reaction with Class 70R = 471.06 ton
Total DL + LL Reaction with Class A = 477.63 ton Total DL + LL Reaction with ClassA = 499.19 ton
Left Span, Bearing center line to c/l of pier = 1.663 m

Right Span, Bearing center line to c/l of pier = 1.663 m
Total Longitudinal Moment due to difference of Reaction with class 70R = 13.21 ton.m
Total Longitudinal Moment due to difference of Reaction with class A = -35.84 ton.m
Page 12
Annexure B
Weight of Pier Abutment Structure
3
Density of Concrete = 2.4 t/m HFL = 58.88 m
3
Density of Earth = 1.64 t/m LWL = 47.70 m
Sr. Description of Shape Nos. Area Depth Weight
No. Structure (A) m2 (D) m Tons
1 Piercap Rectangle 1 32.400 0.80 62.21
2 Piercap Piramid 1 23.400 0.70 39.31
3 Pier (HFL) Octagonal 1 13.542 11.472 221.42
4 (LWL) Octagonal 1 13.542 11.472 372.84
Total at (HFL) 322.94
Total at (LWL) 474.36
Page 13
Annexure C
DESIGN OF WELL FOUNDATION P2
Evaluation of weight of well

DATA
Formation level = 63.965 m
Piercap top level = 60.672 m
Ground Level = 45.60 m
Well cap top level = 47.70 m
Founding level = 14.70 m
Normal Scour level = 30.50 m
Top / Int. plug soffit level = 30.50 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Height of well (including wellcap) = 33.00 m
well diameter = 8.50 m

steining thickness Increse / Decrese = -5% = 1.400 m
Say = 1.40 m
wellcap thickness = 2.00 m
curb height = 2.66 m
Top / Int. plug thickness = 0.30 m
Design HFL = 58.88 m

LWL = 47.70 m
3
Submerged density of soil 0.30 17.36 m = 1.80 T/m
Maximum mean velocity 0.30 = 2.112 m/s
/
2
wellcap area (Awc) = 56.75 m
2
Area at base (Ab) Bottom Plug = 58.77 m
0
Internal diameter (ID) 2.360 32.0 = 5.70 m
2
Steining area (Astei) = 31.23 m
2
Dredge hole area (Ad) 14.70 m = 25.52 m
1 Bottom Plug
3
Density = 2.20 T/m
volume :- V1 = (Ab + Ad + Sqrt( Ab x Ad )) x Ht /3
= 96.77 m3
V2 = Ad x 0.6
= 15.31 m3
3
Total volume = 112.08 m
weight = 246.57 T
2 Sump (Add 15.00 % )
3
weight = 36.99 T
Page 14
3 Curb
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
volume = Ab x curb Ht. - Vplug + Ad x 0.3 = 51.90 m
weight = 129.74 T
4 Steining
3
Density = 2 50 t/m
2.50
height of steining = 28.34 m
3
Volume = 884.99 m
weight = 2212.46 T
5 Material filling
3
Density
y = 1.80 T/m
filling height = 12.84 m
3
Volume of filling = 327.67 m
weight of filling = 589.81 T
6 Water fill
3
Density = 1.00 T/m
filli height
filling h i ht = 14.90
14 90 m
7 Top / Int. plug

3
Density = 2.20 T/m
3
volume = Ad x Int. plg thk = 7.66 m
Weight of plug = 16.84 T
8 Wellcap
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
volume = 113.49 m
weight = 283.73 T
9 Soil load on curb

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
Height = 13.14 m
3
volume = (Ab - A wc ) x Ht = 26.55 m
weight = 47.79 T
9 Soil load on well cap

3
Density = 1.64 T/m
Height = 0.00 m
3
volume = 0.00 m
weight = 0.00 T
Page 15
TOTAL WEIGHT OF WELL STRUCTURE = 3944.11 T

Buoyancy 100 % At LWL (-) = 1877.96 T
100 % At HFL and (-) = 1877.96 T
NET Wt. OF WELL WELL STRUCTURE At LWL 2066.15 T
At HFL 2066.15 T
10 Steining up to scour level

3
Density = 2.50 t/m
3
Volume Not Used = 474.63 m
weight = 1186.56 T
Weight of well structure above scour level (dry) including well cap = 1867.32 T
Weight of well structure above scour level (dry) excluding well cap = 1583.59 T
11 Soil load on inclined well in longitudinal direction

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Submerged Density = 0.80 T/m
Slope/Tilt = 1 in 48.0
Diameter of Well = 8 50 m
8.50
Height = 15.71 m
2
Projected area at scour level = 38.91 m
2
Projected area at founding level = 36.13 m
3
Volume of shaded area (Ab + Ad + Sqrt( Ab x Ad )) x Ht /3 = 589.34 m
3
Less Volume of Well = 445.80 m
3
Volume = 143.53 m
weight = 114.83 T
Acting distance from center of well = 2.04 m
47.70 m
1
48 00
48.00
Scour Level/Ground Level 30.50 m
14.79 m
14.70 m
Page 16
11 Soil load on inclined well in transverse direction

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Slope/Tilt = 1 in 48
Diameter of Well = 8.50 m
Height = 15.71 m
2
Projected area at scour level = 38 91 m
38.91
2
3
3
3
Volume = 143.53 m
weight = 114.83 T
Page 17
Design By : KM Job: Design of Well Foundation, P2, Kopili Bridge. Doc No. TTS/2012/DN/17, R0
Annexure D
A Live Load (Longitudinal Direction )
For Maximum Reaction and Maximum Longitudinal Moment
C of pier
x
Proj
Effective span
C A span B
1.0 Class 70R

span = 37.81 m span = 45.52 m
Proj = 1.66 m Proj = 1.66 m
Eff span = 34.485 m Eff span = 42.19 m
For, x = -7.25 m
Load (T) Wheel spacing Dist @ Mom @ B Load (T) Wheel Dist @ Mom @
(m) B (m) (m) spacing D (m) D (m)
(m)
17 1.37 36.15 614.55 8 30.00 13.85 110.8
17 3.05 34.78 591.26 12 3.96 9.89 118.68
17 1.37 31.73 539.41 12 1.52 8.37 100.44
17 2.13 30.36 516.12 17 2.13 6.24 106.08
12 1.52 28.23 338.76 17 1.37 4.87 82.79
12 3.96 26.71 320.52
8 30.00 22.75 182.00
-7.25 0.00
100 43.4 3102.62 66 38.98 518.79
RA = 89.97 T RC = 12.30 T
RB = . 3 T
10.03 RD = 53.70 T
53.7
Page 18
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-
DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
2.0 Class A 2 Lane

For, x = -2.65 m
(m)
11.4 1.20 36.15 412.11 2.7 3.20 40.65 109.76
11.4 4.30 34.95 398.43 2.7 1.10 39.55 106.79
6.8 3.00 30.65 208.42 6.8 20.00 19.55 132.94
6.8 3.00 27.65 188.02 6.8 3.00 16.55 112.54
6.8 3.00 24.65 167.62 6.8 3.00 13.55 92.14
6.8 20.00 21.65 147.22 6.8 3.00 10.55 71.74
2.7 1.10 1.65 4.455 11.4 4.30 6.25 71.25
2.7 3.20 0.55 1.485
-2.65
2 65 0
-2.65 0
55.4 38.8 1527.76 44 37.6 697.15
RA = 44.30 T RC = 20.22 T
RB = 11.10 T RD = 23.78 T
Total Reaction, R = 64.52 T
B Summary and Live Load

For Maximum Reaction / Maximum Longitudinal Moment
Live Load in Normal considered = 100 %
Loading RA RC Max.Reac ML ec MT MT
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) (m) (T-m) (T-m)
Class 70 R 89.97 12.30 102.27 129.13 2.03 207.60 207.60
Class A, 2 - Lane 88.60 40.43 129.04 80.09 1.58 203.23 203.23
C Horizontal Force At Bearing Level

Friction coefficient = 0.05
Breaking Force, Class 70 R 1st Train 2nd Train
Fh = 20 100 10 0
= 20 T
Contribution in Normal Case = 100 %
mR Component atcting at bearing = 23.95 T
Fh in Normal Condition = 33.95 T
Acting at RL = 60.922 m
Founding Level = 14.70 m
Moment at Founding Level = 1569.23 ton.m
Breaking Force, Class A-2 Lane

1st Train 2nd Train
Fh = 20 55.4 10 0
= 11.08 T
Contribution in Normal Case = 100 %
Fh iin N
Normall C
Condition
diti = 29 49
29.49 T
Page 19
DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
D Footpath Live Load

For Maximum Reaction and Corresponding Transverse Moment
Intensity of FPLL = 371 kg/m2

Footpath Width = 1.49 m
Uniform Distributed Load, w = 0.55 Tons/m
Span Length, l = 37.81 m
Loading RA RC Pier ML ec MT
( T ) ( T ) Reaction ( T-m ) (m) (T-m)
( T )
One Span Loaded 10.42 0.00 10.42 17.32 4.07 42.39
Both Span Loaded 10.42 10.42 20.83 0.00 4.07 84.78
E Super Imposed Dead Load
Item Area Nos. Density Trans. Ecc Moment

in m 2 in ton/m 3 in mton/m in m in ton-m/m
Crash Barrier(LS) 0.29 1 2.4 0.70 -4.850 -3.405

Crash Barrier(RS) 0 30
0.30 1 24
2.4 0 73
0.73 3 058
3.058 2 220
2.220
Wearing Coat 0.56 1 2.2 1.24 -0.875 -1.083
Handrail 1 1.0 0.28 4.918 1.377
Railing Kerb 0.45 1 2.4 1.09 4.918 5.346
Total = 4.03 4.456
Total SIDL after rounding = 4.10 Tons/m
With effective eccentricity = 1.09 m
L f S
Left Span L
Length,
h l = 37.81 m
Right Span Length, l = 45.52 m
( T )
Both Span Loaded 77.51 93.31 170.82 -26.26 1.09 185.64
Page 20
DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
Annexure E
EVALUATION OF WATER CURRENT FORCES Foundations
Data
Scour level for pier condition = 30.50 m
Water current velocity ( mean ) V = 2.12 m/s
Water current velocity ( max.) = 2 V = 3.00 m/s
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Wellcap top level = 47.70 m
Foundingg level = 14.70 m
Diameter of well = 8.50 m
Pier width in trans. direction = 2.00 m
Pier width in long. direction = 7.20 m
Span on both side of the pier = 43 m
Variation of water current velocity
58.88 HFL
11.18 47.70 Well Cap Top
17.20
30.50 Scour Lvl./Rock Level
Evaluation of water current moments (Refer Cl.213, IRC : 6-1966)
Angle at which curent strikes the pier = 0 degree

Max. longi. velocity = 0.00 m/s
M
Max. Trans.
T s velocity
l it = 3.00
3 00 m/s
/s
Page 21
Reference level at which moment is evaluated = 14.70 m

structure K 2
pmax T/m pmin T/m 2
Height Proj. W Force At R.L. Moment
m m T M T-m
Longitudinal Direction
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 11.18 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 17.20 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Transverse Direction
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.31 0.19 11.18 2.00 5.54 53.75 216.33
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.19 0.00 17.20 8.50 13.67 41.97 372.61
Total 19.21 588.94

Max. Trans. velocity y = 2.82 m/s
m

structure K 2
pmax T/m pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier above
Well Cap
p 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.33 53.75 91.10
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.02 0.00 17.20 8.50 1.60 41.97 43.59
Total 3.93 134.69
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.27 0.17 11.18 2.00 4.89 53.75 191.02
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.17 0.00 17.20 8.50 12.07 41.97 329.02
Total 16.96 520.05
Page 22
Annexure F
Moments due to tilt and shift
Moment due to tilt and shift in longitudinal direction
Actual tilt 1 in T = 1 in 48.0

Actual shift = 0 mm
i) Dead load & LL

DL = Total dead load upto wellcap top (HFL case) = 1170.72 T
= DLss + GIss + Wt. of abut. Pier structure (LWL case) = 1322.15 T
DL + LL = For max. LL condition (HFL case) = 1296.01 T
(LWL case) = 1447.44 T
H= Top of well cap - Founding Level = 33.00 m
Moment = (DL+LL) x (H/Tilt + Shift) (HFL case) = 891.01 T-m
(LWL case) = 995.11 T-m
ii) Wellcap
Net Weight (HFL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
H= Soffit of well cap - Founding Level = 31.00 m
Moment = Weight x H / Tilt (HFL case) = 109.94 T-m
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
Net Wt. = Net wt. of well structure - Net wt. of wellcap (HFL case) = 1895.91 T
(LWL case) = 1895.91 T
Moment = Weight x (H/2) / Tilt (HFL case) = 612.22 T-m
(LWL case) = 612.22 T-m
Total Moment due to Tilt & Shift, (Mts) (HFL case) = 1613.17 T-m
(LWL case) = 1717.28 T-m
Page 23
Moment due to tilt and shift in transverse direction
Actual tilt 1 in T = 1 in 48
Actual shift = 918 mm
i) Dead load & LL

(LWL case) = 1447.44 T
(LWL case) = 2323.86 T-m
ii) Wellcap
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
(LWL case) = 1895.91 T
(LWL case) = 612.22 T-m
(LWL case) = 3046.02 T-m
Page 24
Annexure H
ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
Water level = 47.70 m
R.L. in m γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer

y thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ((T-m)) @ R.L.
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
Kg/cm Degree T/m T/m (Z) m m m T m 14.70
30.50 30.50 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 28.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 2.001 0.368 2.501 2.501 8.50 2.0 1.96 28.83 27.66
28.00 27.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 2.801 0.516 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 1.88 27.47 23.99
27.00 26.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 3.601 0.663 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 2.50 26.48 29.49
26.00 25.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.401 0.810 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 3.13 25.48 33.75
25.00 24.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.201 0.957 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 3.76 24.49 36.75
24.00 23.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.001 1.104 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 4.38 23.49 38.50
23.00 22.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.801 1.252 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 5.01 22.49 39.00
22 00
22.00 21 00
21.00 1 80
1.80 0
0.800
800 0 40
40.0
0 0
0.184
184 0.000
0 000 7.601
7 601 1.399
1 399 1.000
1 000 1.000
1 000 8.50
8 50 2
2.0
0 5
5.63
63 21.49
21 49 38.25
38 25
21.00 20.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.401 1.546 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 6.26 20.49 36.25
20.00 19.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.201 1.693 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 6.88 19.49 32.99
19.00 18.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.001 1.841 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 7.51 18.49 28.49
18.00 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.640 0.640 8.50 2.0 5.13 17.68 15.29
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 80
1.80 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 10 513
10.513 1 935
1.935 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 2 0
2.0 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.641 2.327 2.660 2.660 8.65 2.0 24.51 15.99 31.60
78.55 412.01
Where,
γ= γb For soil above water level Note : 1) Pressure is calculated at level R.L. upto in the above table
= γb - 1 For soil below water level 2) Value of the angle of wall friction may be taken as 2/3 rd of φ , the angle of repose,
Ka = Columbs active earth pressure coefficient subject to limit of 22.5 0 as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
2
Nφ = ttan ( π/4
/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in
i assessing
i the
h allowable
ll bl pressure shall
h ll b
be taken
k as per A
Appendix
di 44, IRC : 78
Pressure = Ka x γ x Z For cohesionless soil
=γxZ 2 x C For C -φ soil
Nφ Nφ
Rev. Ht. = Height of layer after neglecting negative pressure zone
Force = Pressure x Rev. Ht. x Width
Moment = Force x L.A.
Page 25
PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION

R.L. in m γb γ C φ KP Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T-m ) @ R.L.
2
From p
upto gm/cm
g 3
gm/cm
g 3
Kg/cm
g Degree
g T/m2 T/m2 ((Z)) m m m T m 14.70
30.50 30.50 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 2.001 25.538 2.501 2.501 8.50 2.0 135.72 28.83 1918.27
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 2.801 35.749 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 130.23 27.47 1663.37
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 3.601 45.960 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 173.63 26.48 2045.22
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.401 56.171 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 217.03 25.48 2340.28
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.201 66.382 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 260.42 24.49 2548.54
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.001 76.593 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 303.82 23.49 2670.00
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.801 86.804 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 347.22 22.49 2704.68
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.601 97.015 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 390.61 21.49 2652.56
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.401 107.226 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 434.01 20.49 2513.65
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.201 117.437 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 477.41 19.49 2287.94
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.001 127.648 1.000 1.000 8.50 2.0 520.80 18.49 1975.44
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.640 0.640 8.50 2.0 356.09 17.68 1060.20
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 12 764 0.000
12.764 0 000 10 513
10.513 134 183
134.183 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 2 0
2.0 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.50 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17 36
17.36 14 70
14.70 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 12 764 0.000
12.764 0 000 12 641
12.641 161 344
161.344 2 660
2.660 2 660
2.660 8 65
8.65 2 0
2.0 1699 94
1699.94 15 99
15.99 2191 66
2191.66
5446.95 28571.81
Where,
Kp = Columbs active earth pressure coefficient subject to limit of 22.5 0 as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
Nφ = tan2( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
Pressure = Kp x γ x Z For cohesionless soil
= γ xZ xNφ 2 x C x Nφ For C -φ soil
Page 26
Annexure H

y thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T-m ) @ R.L.
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
30.50 30.50 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.50 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 2.001 0.368 2.501 2.501 8.50 2 1.96 28.83 27.66
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 2.801 0.516 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 1.88 27.47 23.99
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 3.601 0.663 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 2.50 26.48 29.49
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.401 0.810 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 3.13 25.48 33.75
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.201 0.957 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 3.76 24.49 36.75
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.001 1.104 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 4.38 23.49 38.50
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.801 1.252 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 5.01 22.49 39.00
22 00
22.00 21
21.00
00 1.8
1 8 0.800
0 800 0 40.0
40 0 0
0.184
184 0.000
0 000 7.601
7 601 1.399
1 399 1.000
1 000 1.000
1 000 8
8.50
50 2 5.63
5 63 21.49
21 49 38.25
38 25
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.401 1.546 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 6.26 20.49 36.25
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.201 1.693 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 6.88 19.49 32.99
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.001 1.841 1.000 1.000 8.50 2 7.51 18.49 28.49
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.640 0.640 8.50 2 5.13 17.68 15.29
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 10 513
10.513 1 935
1.935 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 2 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.513 1.935 0.000 0.000 8.50 2 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.641 2.327 2.660 2.660 8.65 2 24.51 15.99 31.60
78.55 412.01
Where,
Ka = Columbs active earth pressure coefficient subject to limit of 22.5 0 as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78-1983.
2
Nφ = ttan ( π/4
/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in
i assessing
i the
h allowable
h ll b
be taken
k as per A
Appendix
di 44, IRC : 78
78-1983.
1983
Nφ Nφ
Page 27
Annexure H
R.L. in m γb γ C φ KP Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T
T-m
m ) @ R.L.
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
Kg/cm Degree T/m2 T/m2 (Z) m m m T m 14.70
30.50 30.50 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 2.001 25.538 2.501 2.501 8.5 2.0 135.72 28.83 1918.27
28.00
8. 27.00
7. 1.8
.8 0.800
.8 0 40.0
. 12.764
.76 0.000
. 2.801
.8 35.749
35.7 9 1.000
. 1.000
. 8.5 2.0
. 130.23
3 . 3 27.47
7. 7 1663.37
663.37
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 3.601 45.960 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 173.63 26.48 2045.22
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.401 56.171 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 217.03 25.48 2340.28
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.201 66.382 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 260.42 24.49 2548.54
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.001 76.593 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 303.82 23.49 2670.00
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.801 86.804 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 347.22 22.49 2704.68
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.601 97.015 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 390.61 21.49 2652.56
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.401 107.226 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 434.01 20.49 2513.65
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.201 117.437 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 477.41 19.49 2287.94
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.001 127.648 1.000 1.000 8.5 2.0 520.80 18.49 1975.44
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.640 0.640 8.5 2.0 356.09 17.68 1060.20
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.513 134.183 0.000 0.000 8.5 2.0 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.641 161.344 2.660 2.660 8.65 2.0 1699.94 15.99 2191.66
5446.95 28571.81
Where,
Kp = Columbs active earth pressure coefficient subject to limit of 22 5 0 as per Appendix 4
22.5 4, IRC : 78-1983.
78 1983
2
Nφ = tan ( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78-1983.
Force = Pressure x Rev.. Ht.. x Width
F W
Moment = Force x L.A. Page 28
Design By : KM
Checked By: SP
STEINING STRESS CHECKING
Page 29
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-
17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
DESIGN OF STEINING 29.11 m ( LWL condition )
Determination of critical section

Critical section for design of steining occures at the depth 'x' below well cap top at which net
resultant horizontal force become zero
Assumed depth of critical section below well cap top = 18 59 m

18.59
Seismic Scour level = 30.50 m
Critical section level = 29.11 m
HL HT HR At R.L. ML
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Water current forces 2 62
2.62 19 76
19.76 33 67
33.67
2 Friction force 33.95 60.92 1080.12
3 Active Earth Pressure 0.61 0.28
4 Live Load surcharge 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 36.57 19.76 42.17 1114.07
1 Passive Earth Pressure 42.17 19.60

Net Totall 0 00
0.00 1094.47
1094 47

Actual tilt = 1 in 33.9
i)) Well steining

g
Well cap thickness = 2.00 m
Well cap bottom level = 45.70 m
Reference level section of well steining = 29.11 m
2
Cross section area of steining = 31.23 m
3
Volume of steining = 518.16 m
D
Density
it of
f concrete
t of
f steining
t i i = 2.50 t/ 3
2 50 t/m
Dry weight of steining = 1295.40 T
Porosity of concrete considered = 15.00 %
Bouyancy due to porosity of water = 77.72 T
Net Weight = 1217.68 T
H= Soffit of well cap - critical section considered = 16.59 m
Moment = Weight x (H/2) / Tilt = 297.65 T-m
T m
Page 30
ii) Wellcap
3
Volume of well cap = 113.49 m
3
Density of concrete of well cap = 2.50 t/m
Dry weight of well cap = 283.73 T
Net Weight = 266 70 T
266.70
Moment = Weight x H / Tilt = 130.39 T-m
iii) Dead load & LL

DL = Total dead load upto Piercap top
= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load of Sub Structure
Dead Load Piercap = 101.52 T
Dead Load of Pier
3
Volume of Pier = 155.35 m
3
Density of concrete of Pier = 2.40 t/m
Dry weight of Pier = 372.84 T
Porosity of concrete considered = 0 00 %
0.00
Net Weight of Pier = 372.84 T
DL + LL= For max. LL condition = 1770.37 T
H= Top of well cap - critical section considered = 18.59 m
Moment = (DL+LL) x (H/Tilt + Shift) = 2595.02 T-m
Total Moment due to Tilt & Shift, (Mts) = 3023.06 tm
Summary of loads at R.L. 29.11 m
V ML MT MR (
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) T-m )
1 Superstructure reaction
Dead Load 676.97 13.21
General items 170.82 0.00
Live Load 125.29 0.00 207.60
Friction force 1080.12
2 Water current forces 33.67 254.14
3 Pier and Piercap 474.36 0.00
4 Wellcap & steining (net) 1484.38
5 Tilt and shift moments 3023.06
Total 2931.8 1127.0 461.7 4241.3
1 Passive earth pressure 19 60

19.60 19.60
Page 31
Check for steining stresses
Here, Passive relief moment at section < Active moment at section

Hence, moment is transferred at the section considered
Vertical load at the critical section (V) = 2931.82 T

Net Moment at the critical section (MR) = 4221 66 T-m
4221.66
Area of steining (As) = 31.23 m2

Moment of inertia (I) = 204.42 m4
Section modulus (Z) = 48.10 m3
Steining stresses
σmax = V/As + MR/Zs
= 93.89 + 87.77 = 181.66 T/m2
σmin = V/As - MR/Zs

= 93.89 - 87.77 = 6.12 T/m2
Concrete grade Stresses are as per IRC : 21-2000 = M 30

σcbc = Permissible flexural compressive streses in concrete = 1000 T/m2
σcbt = Permissible flexural tensile stresses in plain concrete = -67 T/m2
Here, stresses are with in the permissible limit

Hence, section is safe as PCC
Page 32
EVALUATION OF WATER CURRENT FORCES (LWL) P2
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Span
p on both side of the p
pier = 41.663 m
47.70 LWL
0.00 47.70 Wellcap top level
17.20
30.50 Scour Lvl.

Max. llongi. velocity
l = 1.02 m/s
/
Max. Trans. velocity = 2.81 m/s

structure K pmax T/m2 pmin T/m2 Height Proj. W Force At R.L. Moment
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.04 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well
W ll 0.66
0 66 0
0.04
04 0
0.00
00 17
17.20
20 8.50
8 50 2.62
2 62 41.97
41 97 71.38
71 38
Total 2.62 71.38
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.27 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.27 0.00 17.20 8.50 19.76 41.97 538.85
Total 19.76 538.85
Reference level at which moment is evaluated = 29 11

29.11
structure K pmax T/m 2
pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.04 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.04 0.00 17.20 8.50 2.62 41.97 33.67
Total 2.62 33.67
Pier 0.66
0 66 0.27
0 27 0 27
0.27 0 00
0.00 2 00
2.00 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00
Well 0.66 0.27 0.00 17.20 8.50 19.76 41.97 254.14
Total 19.76 254.14
Page 33
DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40
Active Earth Pressure calculation

Reference level at which force and moment is required = 29.11 m
R L in m
R.L. γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk Rev.
Rev Ht
Ht. Width FOS Force At R
R.L.
L Fact Mom
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
Kg/cm Degree T/m2 T/m2 (Z) m m m T m (T-m)
30.501 30.501 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.5 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.501 29.107 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 1.115 0.205 1.394 1.394 8.5 2 0.61 29.57 0.28
0.61 0.28
Where,
Ka = Columbs active
act ve earth pressure coefficient
coeff c ent subject
j to limit of 22.5 0 as p
per Appendix
pp 4,, IRC : 78-1983.
Nφ = tan2( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78-1983.
Nφ Nφ
Rev Ht
Page 34
Passive Earth Pressure calculation
R.L. in m γb γ C φ KP Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact Mom
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
30.50 30.50 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.5 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 29.11 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 1.115 14.236 1.394 1.394 8.5 2 42.17 29.57 19.60
42.17 19.60
Where,,
Kp = Columbs active earth pressure coefficient subject to limit of 22.5 0 as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78-1983.
Page 35
DESIGN OF STEINING 29.26 m ( HFL condition )


18.44
HL HT HR At R.L. M
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Water current forces 3 90
3.90 16 83
16.83 76 87
76.87
2 Friction force 33.95 60.92 1074.99
4 Live Load surcharge 0.00 0.00
Total 37.85 16.83 41.91 1152.06

Net Totall 0 0
0.0 1134.70
1134 70

i)) Well steining

g
2
3
D
Density
it of
f concrete
t of
f steining
t i i = 2.50 t/m3
2 50 t/
T m
Page 36
ii) Wellcap
3
3
266.70
iii) Dead load & LL

= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load of Pier
3
3
15.00
V ML MT MR
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
Dead Load 676.97 13.21
Live Load 125.29 0.00 207.60
Total 2897.4 1151.0 539.2 4245.8
1 Passive earth pressure 17 4

17.4 17.4
Page 37


4228.44

Steining stresses
= 92.78 + 87.91 = 180.70 T/m2

= 92.78 - 87.91 = 4.87 T/m2

σcbt = Permissible flexural tensile stresses in plain concrete = -67 T/m2
Here, stresses are with in the permissible limit

Hence, section is safe as PCC
Page 38
EVALUATION OF WATER CURRENT FORCES (HFL) P2
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Span
p on both side of the p
pier = 88 m
58.88 HFL
17.20
30.50 Scour Lvl.

Max. llongi. velocity
l = 1.02 m/s
/

m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.32 53.75 90.41
Well
W ll 0.66
0 66 0.02
0 02 0.00
0 00 17.20
17 20 8.50
8 50 1.59
1 59 41.97
41 97 43.26
43 26
Total 3.90 133.67
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.16 11.18 2.00 4.86 53.75 189.58
Well 0.66 0.16 0.00 17.20 8.50 11.98 41.97 326.54
Total 16.83 516.13
Reference level at which moment is evaluated = 29 26 m

29.26
pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.32 53.75 56.71
Well 0.66 0.02 0.00 17.20 8.50 1.59 41.97 20.16
Total 3.90 76.87
Pier 0.66
0 66 0.27
0 27 0 16
0.16 11 18
11.18 2 00
2.00 4 86
4.86 53.75
53 75 118 90
118.90
Well 0.66 0.16 0.00 17.20 8.50 11.98 41.97 152.20
Total 16.83 271.10
Page 39
DN-17,PierWell-P2(N),R0 13-01-201220:40

R.L. in m γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact Mom
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
Kg/cm Degree T/m T/m (Z) m m m T m (T-m)
30.501 30.501 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.5 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.501 29.258 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 0.994 0.183 1.243 1.243 8.5 2 0.48 29.67 0.20
0.48 0.20
Where,
=γxZ 2 x C For C -φ
φ soil
Nφ Nφ
Page 40
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
30.50 30.50 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 0.00 0.00
30.50 29.26 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 0.994 12.693 1.243 1.243 8.5 1.6 41.91 29.67 17.36
41.91 17.36
Where
Where,
Page 41
Page 42
DESIGN SUMMARY

2 2
No. T/m T/m T/m2
Abutment Condition
1 Seismic (LWL) 68.35 68.35 125.00
with 70R with vertical Seismic downward
2 Seismic (LWL) 51.62 51.62 125.00
with Class A with vertical Seismic upward
3 Seismic (HFL) 65.77 65.77 125.00
3 Seismic (HFL) 51.81 51.81 125.00

1 Seismic (LWL) 104.43 150.0 -3163.35 -3600.0
with 70R with vertical Seismic upward
3 Seismic (HFL) 101.24 150.0 -3030.50 -3600.0
Page 43
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Summary of Forces (Under Longitudinal Seismic Condition)
Vertical Loads
Dead Load Reference

Live Load

2 Piercap and Pier

3 Well Foundation

Weight of well structure above scour level (dry) = 1645.75 ton Annexure C

5 Weight of structure above scour level
Vertical load in condition with Class 70 R = 3080.54 ton

Vertical load in condition with Class A = 3093.93 ton
6 Seismic Effect on weight above scour level
Vertical Seismic, αh/2 = 0.14
Vertical seismic in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 415.87 ton

Vertical seismic in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 415.87 ton
Vertical seismic in HFL condition with Class A = 417.68 ton
Vertical seismic in LWL condition with Class A = 417.68 ton
7 Net Vertical Load

V-V*αv V+V*αv
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 3033.21 ton 3864.96 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 3184.63 ton 4016.38 ton
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class A = 3044.79 ton 3880.15 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class A = 3196.21 ton 4031.57 ton
Moment at bearing level from super structure with 70R = -51.38 ton.m Annexure A

Page 44
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
3 From Foundation

4 Longitudinal Seismic
Moment due to Longitudinal Seismic = 26480.30 ton.m Annexure G


3 From Foundation

4 Transverse Seismic
Moment due to Transverse Seismic = 0.00 ton.m

Page 45
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with 70R and Seismic -ve condition )
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3033.21 0.00 30983.69


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 51.62 + 0.00 = 51.62 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

2
= 51.62 - 0.00 = 51.62 T/m
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 46
Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 4016.38 0.00 30983.69


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 68.35 + 0.00 = 68.35 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 68.35 - 0.00 = 68.35 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 47
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011
Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3033.21 0.00 30848.67


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 51.62 + 0.00 = 51.62 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 51.62 - 0.00 = 51.62 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 48
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3864.96 0.00 30848.67


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 65.77 + 0.00 = 65.77 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 65.77 - 0.00 = 65.77 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 49
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3044.79 0.00 30721.85


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 51.81 + 0.00 = 51.81 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 51.81 - 0.00 = 51.81 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 50
Annexure A
C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m2 C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m2
C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m2 C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m2
C/S of slab = 3.588 m2 C/S of slab = 3.588 m2
Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m3 Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m3
Page 51
Live Load


Page 52
Live Load Under Seismic Condition
Live Load Percentage considered = 50.00 % Live Load Percentage considered = 50.00 %

Total Longitudinal Moment due to difference of Reaction with class 70R = -51.38 ton.m
Page 53
Annexure B
LOADS of PIERCAP AND PIER
3
3
2 Piercap Piramid 1 23.400 0.70 39.31
4 (LWL) Octagonal 1 13.542 11.472 372.84
Page 54
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Annexure C

DATA
LWL = 47.70 m

Say = 1.40 m

LWL = 47.70 m
3
2
2
0
Internal diameter (ID)
( ) 2.360 32.0 = 5.70 m
2
2
1 Bottom Plug
3
Density = 2.20 T/m
= 96.77 m3
V2 = Ad x 0.6
= 15.31 m3
3
weight = 246.57 T
2 Sump (Add 15.00% )
3
weight = 36.99 T
Page 55
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
3 Curb
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
weight = 129.74 T
4 Steining
3
Density = 2.50 t/m
3
Volume = 884.99 m
weight = 2212.46 T
5 Material filling
3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
6 Water fill
3
Density = 1.00 T/m
7 Top / Int. plug

3
Density = 2.20 T/m
3
8 Wellcap
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
volume = 113 49 m
113.49
weight = 283.73 T
9 Soil load on curb

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
Height = 15.98 m
3
weight = 58.11 T

3
Density = 1.64 T/m
Height = 0.00 m
3
volume = 0.00 m
weight = 0.00 T
Page 56
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

Buoyancy 100 % At LWL (-) = 1877.96 T
100 % At HFL and (-) = 1877.96 T
At HFL 2076.47 T

3
Density = 2.50 t/m
3
Volume = 386.00 m
weight = 965.00 T

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Height = 18.55 m
2
2
3
3
3
Volume = 174.06 m
weight = 139.25 T
47
47.70
70 m
1
48.00
14.79 m
14.70 m
Page 57
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for
for P2\TTS-2012-
P2\TTS-2012-
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Height = 18.55 m
2
2
3
3
3
Volume = 174.06 m
weight = 139.25 T
Page 58
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Annexure D
C of pier
x
Proj
Effective span
C A span B
1.0 Class 70R

span = 37.81 m span = 45.52 m
Proj = 1.66 m Proj = 1.66 m
For, x = 22.75 m
Load (T) Wheel spacing Dist @ B Mom @ B Load (T) Wheel Dist @ Mom @
(m) (m) (m) spacing D (m) D (m)
(m)
17 1.37 36.15 614.47 8 30.00 13.86 110.84
17 3.05 34.78 591.18 12 3.96 9.90 118.74
17 1.37 31.73 539.33 12 1.52 8.38 100.5
17 2.13 30.36 516.04 17 2.13 6.25 106.17
12 1.52 28.23 338.70 17 1.37 4.88 82.875
12 3.96 26.71 320.46
8 30.00 22.75 181.96
100 43.4 3102.12 66 38.98 519.12
RA = 89.96 T RC = 12.30 T
RB = 10.04 T RD = 53.70 T
2.0 Class A 2 Lane

For, x = -2.65 m
Load (T) Wheel spacing Dist @ B Mom @ B Load (T) Wheel Dist @ Mom @
(m) (m) (m) spacing D (m) D (m)
(m)
11.4 1.20 36.15 412.11 2.7 3.20 40.65 109.76
11.4 4.30 34.95 398.43 2.7 1.10 39.55 106.79
6.8 3.00 30.65 208.42 6.8 20.00 19.55 132.94
6.8 3.00 27.65 188.02 6.8 3.00 16.55 112.54
6.8 3.00 24.65 167.62 6.8 3.00 13.55 92.14
6.8 20.00 21.65 147.22 6.8 3.00 10.55 71.74
2.7 1.10 1.65 4.455 11.4 4.30 6.25 71.25
2.7 3.20 0.55 1.485
-2.65 0
-2.65 0
55.4 38.8 1527.76 44 37.6 697.15
RA = 44.30 T RC = 20.22 T
RB = 11.10 T RD = 23.78 T
Page 59
17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

Live Load in seismic considered = 50 %
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) (m) (T-m) (T-m)
Class 70 R 89.96 12.30 102.26 129.10 2.03 207.59 103.79
Class A, 2 - Lane 88.60 40.43 129.04 80.09 1.58 203.23 101.62

Fh = 20 100 10 0
= 20 T
Contribution in Seismic Case = 50 %
Fh in Seismic Condition = 28.95 T

1st Train 2nd Train
Fh = 20 55.4 10 0
= 11.08 T


( T )
One Span Loaded 10.42 0.00 10.42 17.32 4.07 42.39
Both Span Loaded 10.42 10.42 20.83 0.00 4.07 84.78
Page 60
17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

Crash Barrier(LS) 0.29 1 2.4 0.70 -4.850 -3.405

Crash Barrier(RS) 0.30 1 2.4 0.73 3.058 2.220
Wearing Coat 0.56 1 2.2 1.24 -0.875 -1.083
Handrail 1 1.0 0.28 4.918 1.377
Railing Kerb 0.45 1 2.4 1.09 4.918 5.346
Total = 4.03 4.456
Left Span Length, l = 37.81 m
( T )
Both Span Loaded 77.51 93.31 170.82 -26.26 1.09 185.64
Page 61
17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Annexure E
Data
Water current velocity ( max.) = 2V = 3.00 m/s
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
58.88 HFL
14.36

Page 62
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

structure K pmax T/m
2
pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 11.18 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 14.36 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.31 0.17 11.18 2.00 5.39 53.81 210.78
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.17 0.00 14.36 8.50 10.59 42.91 298.66
Total 15.98 509.45


m m T M T-m
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.27 53.81 88.77
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.02 0.00 14.36 8.50 1.24 42.91 34.94
Total 3.51 123.70
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.27 0.15 11.18 2.00 4.76 53.81 186.13
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.15 0.00 14.36 8.50 9.35 42.91 263.73
Total 14.11 449.85
Page 63
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Annexure F

Actual shift = 0 mm
i) Dead load & LL

(LWL case) = 1384.79 T
(LWL case) = 952.04 T-m
ii) Wellcap
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
(LWL case) = 1906.23 T
(LWL case) = 615.55 T-m
(LWL case) = 1677.54 T-m
Page 64
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
i) Dead load & LL

(LWL case) = 1384.79 T
(LWL case) = 2223.28 T-m
ii) Wellcap
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
(LWL case) = 1906.23 T
(LWL case) = 615.55 T-m
(LWL case) = 2948.77 T-m
Resultant Tilt:
Tilt in Longitudinal Direction 1 in 48.0
Tilt in Transverse Direction 1 in 48.0
Depth of Well 33.00 m
Offset due to tilt in longitudinal direction 0.688 m
Offset due to tilt in transverse direction 0.688 m
Resultant offset due to tilt 0.97 m
Resultant Tilt: 1 in 33.9
ResultantShift:
Shift in Longitudinal Direction 0.00 mm
Shift in Transverse Direction 918.00 mm
Depth of Well 33.00 m
Resultant offset due to Shift 918.00 mm
Page 65
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Annexure G
EVALUATION OF SEISMIC FORCES P2
Seismic In Longitudinal Direction

Live load reduction for seismic combination = 50.0%
Seismic Coefficent = 0.27
Item V T H T At R.L. Moment

m T-m
Dead Load 623.0 168.22 61.17 7817.5
General Item 155.0 41.86 61.17 1945.1
Live load 108.8 0.00 61.17 0.0
Pier Cap 101.5 27.41 59.92 1239.6
Pier 372.8 100.67 53.44 3899.4
Well Cap 283.7 76.61 46.70 2451.4
Well 1362.0 367.75 39.52 9127.3
Total 3007.0 782.51 26480.3
Note : Seismic forces above the scour level has considered.
Note : Seismic on live load has not been considered, as braking has been considered.
Page 66
Annexure H
R.L. in m γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment (T-m) @ R.L.
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm
3
33.34 31.34 1.80 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.600 0.354 2.000 2.000 8.50 1.6 1.88 32.01 32.57
31.34 28.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.271 0.786 3.339 3.339 8.50 1.6 10.12 29.46 149.29
28.00 27.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.071 0.933 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 4.57 27.49 58.40
27.00 26.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.871 1.081 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 5.35 26.49 63.06
26.00 25.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.671 1.228 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.13 25.49 66.16
25.00 24.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 7.471 1.375 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.91 24.49 67.69
24.00 23.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.271 1.522 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 7.70 23.49 67.66
23.00 22.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.071 1.670 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 8.48 22.49 66.07
22.00 21.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.871 1.817 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 9.26 21.49 62.91
21.00 20.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.671 1.964 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.04 20.49 58.19
20.00 19.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 11.471 2.111 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.83 19.49 51.90
19.00 18.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.271 2.259 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 11.61 18.49 44.04
18.00 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 7.84 17.68 23.34
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 80
1.80 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 12 783
12.783 2 353
2.353 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 1 6
1.6 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 14.911 2.745 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 36.65 16.00 47.50
137.36 858.79
Where,
2
Nφ = tan ( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
Nφ Nφ
Annexure H
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.600 14.557 2.000 2.000 8.50 1.6 77.33 32.01 1338.32
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.271 54.518 3.339 3.339 8.50 1.6 612.66 29.35 8973.93
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.071 64.729 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 316.75 27.49 4049.85
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.871 74.940 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 370.99 26.49 4373.20
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.671 85.151 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 425.24 25.49 4588.06
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.471 95.362 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 479.49 24.49 4694.43
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.271 105.573 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 533.73 23.49 4692.31
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.071 115.784 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 587.98 22.49 4581.70
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.871 125.995 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 642.22 21.49 4362.60
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.671 136.206 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 696.47 20.49 4035.00
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 11.471 146.417 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 750.71 19.49 3598.91
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.271 156.628 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 804.96 18.49 3054.33
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 543.64 17.68 1618.87
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 14.911 190.324 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 2541.68 16.00 3293.85
9383.85 57255.37
Where,
2
Nφ = tan ( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
= γ xZ xNφ 2 x C x N φ For C -φ soil
Page 68
Annexure H
R.L. in m γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T-m ) @ R.L.
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm
3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.600 0.354 2.000 2.000 8.50 1.6 1.88 32.01 32.57
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.271 0.786 3.339 3.339 8.50 1.6 10.12 29.46 149.29
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.071 0.933 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 4.57 27.49 58.40
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.871 1.081 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 5.35 26.49 63.06
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.671 1.228 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.13 25.49 66.16
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 7.471 1.375 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.91 24.49 67.69
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.271 1.522 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 7.70 23.49 67.66
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.071 1.670 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 8.48 22.49 66.07
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.871 1.817 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 9.26 21.49 62.91
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.671 1.964 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.04 20.49 58.19
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 11.471 2.111 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.83 19.49 51.90
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.271 2.259 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 11.61 18.49 44.04
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 7.84 17.68 23.34
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 12 783
12.783 2 353
2.353 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 16
1.6 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 14.911 2.745 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 36.65 16.00 47.50
137.36 858.79
Where,
2
Nφ Nφ
Annexure H
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.600 14.557 2.000 2.000 8.5 1.6 77.33 32.01 1338.32
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.271 54.518 3.339 3.339 8.5 1.6 612.66 29.35 8973.93
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.071 64.729 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 316.75 27.49 4049.85
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.871 74.940 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 370.99 26.49 4373.20
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.671 85.151 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 425.24 25.49 4588.06
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.471 95.362 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 479.49 24.49 4694.43
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.271 105.573 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 533.73 23.49 4692.31
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.071 115.784 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 587.98 22.49 4581.70
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.871 125.995 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 642.22 21.49 4362.60
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.671 136.206 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 696.47 20.49 4035.00
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 11.471 146.417 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 750.71 19.49 3598.91
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.271 156.628 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 804.96 18.49 3054.33
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.640 0.640 8.5 1.6 543.64 17.68 1618.87
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 14.911 190.324 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 2541.68 16.00 3293.85
9383.85 57255.37
Where,
2
Page 70
Design By : KM
Checked By: SP
Page 71
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

Assumed depth of critical section below well cap top = 20.18 m
HL HT HR At R.L. ML
Sr. No. Description
(T] ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Dead Load 168.22 61.17 5661.05
2 General Item 41.86 61.17 1408.55
3 Live load 0.00 61.17 0.00
4 Pier Cap 27.41 59.92 888.17
5 Pier 100.67 53.44 2608.93
6 Well Cap 76.61 46.70 1469.35
7 Well 367.75 39.52 4413.04
8 Water current forces 2.19 16.50 33.65
9 Friction force 28.95 60.92 966.98
Total 813.64 16.50 827.98 17478.40

Net Total 0.00 15987.63

i) Well steining
2
3
3
Density of concrete of steining = 2.50 t/m
ii) Wellcap
3
3
iii) Dead load & LL

= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load Piercap = 101.52 T Page 72
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-
P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Dead Load of Pier

3
3
V ML MT MR (
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) T-m )
Dead Load 676.97 -51.38
Live Load 62.64 0.00 103.79
Seismic force 17449.73
3 Pier and Piercap 474.36
Total 2985.7 949.3 17807.5 20944.7


Net Moment at the critical section (MR) = 19453.97 T-m

Steining stresses
= 95.61 + 404.4532 = 500.06 T/m2

= 95.61 - 404.4532 = -308.84 T/m2

σcbt = Permissible flexural tensile stresses in plain concrete = -100.5 T/m2
Here, stresses are not with in the permissible limit

Hence, tension developed, section is required to be designed as R.C. section
Page 73
P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Span on both side of the pier = 41.66 m
47.70 LWL
14.36
33.34 Scour Lvl.


pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.04 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.04 0.00 14.36 8.50 2.19 42.91 61.67
Total 2.19 61.67
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.27 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.27 0.00 14.36 8.50 16.50 42.91 465.54
Total 16.50 465.54
Reference level at which moment is evaluated = 27.52

m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.04 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.04 0.00 14.36 8.50 2.19 42.91 33.65
Total 2.19 33.65
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.27 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.27 0.00 14.36 8.50 16.50 42.91 254.01
Total 16.50 254.01
Page 74
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
1.0 Title : DESIGN OF HOLLOW AND SOLID CIRCULAR R.C.C. SECTION
2.0 Preamble:
The aim of the present sheet is to design a solid and hollow circular R.C.C.
section subject to combined axial thrust and any-axis bending.
3.0 Input : Y
c.g
n
N.A. y X-bar
θin
X X D
tc θout
Ast(outer)
Ast(inner)
Y
Outer diameter = Do = 8.500 m
Inner diameter = Di = 5.700 m
Shell Thickness = tc = 1.4 m
2
Steel in outer ring = Ast(outer) = 785.4 cm
Effective cover to outer steel = d'out = 0.0975 m
2
Steel in inner ring = Ast(inner) = 502.7 cm
Reinforcement in percentage = %= 0.412
Effective cover to inner steel = d'inn = 0.095 m
2
Allowable tensile stresses in steel = fs = -3600 Kg/cm
2
Allowable compressive
p stresses in concrete = fc = 150.0 Kg/cm
g
Modular ratio = m= 10 m
Design force = F= 2985.7 T
Design Moment = M= 19454.0 T-m
Eccentricity = e= 6.516 m
4.0 Evaluation of steel properties

Ast(equivalent) (m2) 4
I(equivalent) (m )
Outer ring 0.785 6.771
Inner ring 0.503 2.180
Total 1.288 8.951
Page 75
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
5.0 Sectional properties

c
θout = 1.04
c
θin = 0.71
A x A*x Iself IXX

Outer circle 10.800 3.019 32.611 3.254 101.722
Inner circle -1.738 2.442 -4.245 -0.056 -10.424
Steel 1.288 0.000 0.000 8.951 8.951
Total 10.350 28.366 12.149 100.249
C.g. distance of the effective area from physical centroid = X-bar = 2.741 m
4
Effective moment of inertia = Ieff = 22.508 m
C.g. distance of the effective area from Neutral Axis = y= 0.576 m
Depth of Neutral Axis from extreme compression fibre = n= 2.085 m
6.0 Stresses
2
Concrete stresses = fc = 1044.28 T/m
2
= 104.43 Kg/cm
Steel stresses = fs = -31633.5 T/m2
2
= -3163.35 Kg/cm
7.0 Checks
Assumed Calculated
n 2.085 2.085 m
Actual Permissible.
2
fc 104.43 150.0 Kg/cm
2
fs -3163.35 -3600.0 Kg/cm
8.0 Refernces :
1) Raina V. K., Concrete bridge practice Analysis,Design and Economics, Tata Mcgraw-Hill
publising company limited, 1991.
2) Young W. C., Roark's Formulas for stress and strain , Mcgraw-Hill Book Company,
sixth edition 1989.
Formulated by -KIRAN
Page 76
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm
3
33.339 31.339 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.600 0.354 2.000 2.000 8.5 1.6 1.88 32.01 8.44
31.339 27.519 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.656 0.857 3.820 3.820 8.5 1.6 12.29 29.17 20.22
14.17 28.67
Where,
repose
2
Nφ Nφ
Page 77
2
From upto gm/cm3 gm/cm
3
Kg/cm Degree T/m2 T/m
2
(Z) m m m T m (T-m)
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.600 14.557 2.000 2.000 8.5 1.6 77.33 32.01 346.95
31.34 27.52 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 4.656 59.426 3.820 3.820 8.5 1.6 750.65 29.04 1143.82
827.98 1490.78
Where,
22.5 4, IRC : 78-1983.
78-1983
2
Page 78

Assumed depth of critical section below well cap top = 20.18 m
HL HT HR At R.L. ML
Sr. No. Description
(T] ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Dead Load 168.22 61.17 5879.27
2 General Item 41.86 61.17 1567.49
3 Live load 0.00 61.17 0.00
4 Pier Cap 27.41 59.92 888.29
5 Pier 100.67 53.44 2609.36
6 Well Cap 76.61 46.70 1469.67
7 Well 367.75 39.52 4414.60
9 Friction force 28.95 0.00 60.92
Total 814.94 14.00 829.25 16935.56

Net Total 0.0 15441.37

i) Well steining
2
3
3
ii) Wellcap
3
3
iii) Dead load & LL

= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load Piercap = 101.52 T Page 79
P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Dead Load of Pier

3
3
V ML MT MR
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
Dead Load 676.97 -51.38
Live Load 62.64 0.00 103.79
3 Pier and Piercap 451.06
Total 2962.7 993.9 17338.2 20443.8


Net Moment at the critical section (MR) = 18949.62 T-m

Steining stresses
= 94.87 + 393.9676 = 488.84 T/m2

= 94.87 - 393.9676 = -299.09 T/m2


Page 80
P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
58.88 HFL
14.36
33.34 Scour Lvl.


pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.25 53.81 88.10
Well 0.66 0.02 0.00 14.36 8.50 1.23 42.91 34.67
Total 3.48 122.77
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.15 11.18 2.00 4.72 53.81 184.72
Well 0.66 0.15 0.00 14.36 8.50 9.28 42.91 261.74
Total 14.00 446.46

m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.25 53.81 59.23
Well 0.66 0.02 0.00 14.36 8.50 1.23 42.91 18.92
Total 3.48 78.16
Pier 0.66 0.27 0.15 11.18 2.00 4.72 53.81 184.72
Well 0.66 0.15 0.00 14.36 8.50 9.28 42.91 142.85
Total 14.00 327.57
Page 81
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm
3
33.339 31.339 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.600 0.354 2.000 2.000 8.5 1.6 1.88 32.01 8.45
31.339 27.515 1.8 0.800 0 40 0.184 0.000 4.659 0.858 3.824 3.824 8.5 1.6 12.31 29.16 20.28
14.19 28.73
Where,
2
Nφ = tan ( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4,
4 IRC : 78-1983.
Nφ Nφ
Page 82
2
From upto gm/cm3 gm/cm
3
Kg/cm Degree T/m2 T/m
2
(Z) m m m T m (T-m)
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.600 14.557 2.000 2.000 8.5 1.6 77.33 32.01 347.28
31.34 27.52 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.659 59.469 3.824 3.824 8.5 1.6 751.91 29.04 1146.91
829.25 1494.19
Where,
repose
2
Page 83
2.0 Preamble:
3.0 Input : Y
c.g
n
N.A. y X-bar
θin
X X D
tc θout
Ast(outer)
Ast(inner)
Y
2
2
2
2
Allowable compressive
p stresses in concrete = fc = 150.0 Kg/cm
g
Design Moment = M= 18949.6 T-m

Ast(equivalent) (m2) 4
I(equivalent) (m )
Total 1.288 8.951
Page 84
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44

c
θout = 1.04
c
θin = 0.72
A x A*x Iself IXX

Outer circle 10.939 3.008 32.911 3.356 102.368
Inner circle -1.809 2.431 -4.398 -0.062 -10.753
Steel 1.288 0.000 0.000 8.951 8.951
Total 10.418 28.513 12.246 100.566
4
6.0 Stresses
2
2
= 101.24 Kg/cm
Steel stresses = fs = -30305 T/m2
2
= -3030.50 Kg/cm
7.0 Checks
Assumed Calculated
n 2.104 2.104 m
Actual Permissible.
2
fc 101.24 150.0 Kg/cm
2
fs -3030.50 -3600.0 Kg/cm
8.0 Refernces :
2) Young W. C., Roark's Formulas for stress and strain , Mcgraw-Hill Book Company,
sixth edition 1989.
Page 85
DN-17,PierWell-P2(LS),R0 13-01-201220:44
Page 86
DESIGN SUMMARY

2 2
No. T/m T/m T/m2
Abutment Condition
1 Seismic (LWL) 68.35 68.35 125.00
2 Seismic (LWL) 68.60 68.60 125.00
with Class A with vertical Seismic downward
3 Seismic (HFL) 51.62 51.62 125.00
3 Seismic (HFL) 51.81 51.81 125.00

1 Seismic (LWL) 110.48 125.0 -3438.14 -3600.0
3 Seismic (HFL) 112.05 125.0 -3523.04 -3600.0
Page 87
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Summary of Forces (Under Transverse Seismic Condition)
Vertical Loads
Dead Load Reference

Live Load

2 Piercap and Pier

3 Well Foundation

Weight of well structure above scour level (dry) = 1645.75 ton Annexure C

5 Weight of structure above scour level
Vertical load in condition with Class 70 R = 3080.54 ton

Vertical load in condition with Class A = 3093.93 ton
6 Seismic Effect on weight above scour level
Vertical Seismic, αh/2 = 0.14
Vertical seismic in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 415.87 ton

Vertical seismic in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 415.87 ton
Vertical seismic in HFL condition with Class A = 417.68 ton
Vertical seismic in LWL condition with Class A = 417.68 ton
7 Net Vertical Load

V-V*αv V+V*αv
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 3033.21 ton 3864.96 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class 70 R = 3184.64 ton 4016.38 ton
Net vertical load in HFL condition with Class A = 3044.79 ton 3880.15 ton
Net vertical load in LWL condition with Class A = 3196.21 ton 4031.57 ton
Page 88
for P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Moment at bearing level from super structure with 70R = -51.36 ton.m Annexure A
3 From Foundation

4 Longitudinal Seismic
Moment due to Longitudinal Seismic = 0.00 ton.m

Page 89

3 From Foundation

4 Transverse Seismic
Moment due to Transverse Seismic = 28482.07 ton.m Annexure G

Page 90
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with 70R and Seismic -ve condition )
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3184.64 0.00 33617.04


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 54.19 + 0.00 = 54.19 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 54.19 - 0.00 = 54.19 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 91
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with 70R and Seismic +ve condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 4016.38 0.00 33617.04


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 68.35 + 0.00 = 68.35 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 68.35 - 0.00 = 68.35 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 92
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with 70R and Seismic -ve condition )
Sr. V H ML MT MR
Description
No. ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3033.21 0.00 33364.91


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 51.62 + 0.00 = 51.62 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 51.62 - 0.00 = 51.62 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 93
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with 70R and Seismic +ve condition )
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3864.96 0.00 33364.91


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 65.77 + 0.00 = 65.77 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 65.77 - 0.00 = 65.77 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 94
CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with Class A and Seismic -ve condition )
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3044.79 0.00 33350.64


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 51.81 + 0.00 = 51.81 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 51.81 - 0.00 = 51.81 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 95
P2\TTS-2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3880.15 0.00 33350.64


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 66.03 + 0.00 = 66.03 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 66.03 - 0.00 = 66.03 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 96
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 3196.21 0.00 33602.46


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 54.39 + 0.00 = 54.39 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 54.39 - 0.00 = 54.39 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 97
Description
No. T ) T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )

Total 4031.57 0.00 33602.46


Base pressure
Pmax = V/Ab + MR/Zb
= 68.60 + 0.00 = 68.60 T/m2
Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

= 68.60 - 0.00 = 68.60 T/m2
2
Hence, O.K.
Page 98
Annexure A
2
C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m C/S Area at mid span = 5.600 m2
2
C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m C/S Area at Thickening = 7.760 m2
2
C/S of slab = 3.588 m C/S of slab = 3.588 m2
3
Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m Density of concrete = 2.500 ton/m3
Page 99
Live Load


Page 100
Live Load Under Seismic Condition
Live Load Percentage considered = 50.00 % Live Load Percentage considered = 50.00 %

Total Longitudinal Moment due to difference of Reaction with class 70R = -51.36 ton.m
Page 101
Annexure B
3
3
2 Piercap Piramid 1 23.400 0.70 39.31
4 (LWL) Octagonal 1 13.542 11.472 372.84
Page 102
Annexure C

DATA
LWL = 47.70 m

Say = 1.40 m

LWL = 47.70 m
3
/
2
2
0
Internal diameter (ID) 2.360 32.0 = 5.70 m
2
2
1 Bottom Plug
3
Density = 2.20 T/m
= 96.77 m3
V2 = Ad x 0.6
= 15.31 m3
3
weight = 246.57 T
2 Sump (Add 15.00 % )
3
weight = 36.99 T
Page 103
3 Curb
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
weight = 129.74 T
4 Steining
3
Density = 2 50 t/m
2.50
3
Volume = 884.99 m
weight = 2212.46 T
5 Material filling
3
Density
y = 1.80 T/m
3
6 Water fill
3
Density = 1.00 T/m
filli height
filling h i ht = 14.90
14 90 m
7 Top / Int. plug

3
Density = 2.20 T/m
3
8 Wellcap
3
Density = 2.50 T/m
3
volume = 113.49 m
weight = 283.73 T
9 Soil load on curb

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
Height = 15.98 m
3
weight = 58.11 T

3
Density = 1.64 T/m
Height = 0.00 m
3
volume = 0.00 m
weight = 0.00 T
Page 104

Buoyancy 100 % At LWL (-) = 1877.96 T
100 % At HFL and (-) = 1877.96 T
At HFL 2076.47 T

3
Density = 2.50 t/m
3
Volume = 386.00 m
weight = 965.00 T

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Diameter of Well = 8 50 m
8.50
Height = 18.55 m
2
2
3
3
3
Volume = 174.06 m
weight = 139.25 T
47.70 m
1
48 00
48.00
14.79 m
14.70 m
Page 105

3
Density = 1.80 T/m
3
Slope/Tilt = 1 in 48
Height = 18.55 m
2
Projected area at scour level = 39 41 m
39.41
2
3
3
3
Volume = 174.06 m
weight = 139.25 T
Page 106
Annexure D
C of pier
x
Proj
Effective span
C A span B
1.0 Class 70R

span = 37.81 m span = 45.52 m
Proj = 1.66 m Proj = 1.66 m
For, x = -7.25 m
(m)
17 1.37 36.15 614.55 8 30.00 13.85 110.8
17 3.05 34.78 591.26 12 3.96 9.89 118.68
17 1.37 31.73 539.41 12 1.52 8.37 100.44
17 2.13 30.36 516.12 17 2.13 6.24 106.08
12 1.52 28.23 338.76 17 1.37 4.87 82.79
12 3.96 26.71 320.52
8 30.00 22.75 182.00
-7.25 0.00
100 43.4 3102.62 66 38.98 518.79
RA = 89.97 T RC = 12.30 T
RB = . 3 T
10.03 RD = 53.70 T
53.7
Page 107
DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
2.0 Class A 2 Lane

For, x = -2.65 m
(m)
11.4 1.20 36.15 412.11 2.7 3.20 40.65 109.76
11.4 4.30 34.95 398.43 2.7 1.10 39.55 106.79
6.8 3.00 30.65 208.42 6.8 20.00 19.55 132.94
6.8 3.00 27.65 188.02 6.8 3.00 16.55 112.54
6.8 3.00 24.65 167.62 6.8 3.00 13.55 92.14
6.8 20.00 21.65 147.22 6.8 3.00 10.55 71.74
2.7 1.10 1.65 4.455 11.4 4.30 6.25 71.25
2.7 3.20 0.55 1.485
-2.65
2 65 0
-2.65 0
55.4 38.8 1527.76 44 37.6 697.15
RA = 44.30 T RC = 20.22 T
RB = 11.10 T RD = 23.78 T

Live Load in seismic considered = 50 %
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) ( T-m ) (m) (T-m) (T-m)
Class 70 R 89.97 12.30 102.27 129.13 2.03 207.60 103.80
Class A, 2 - Lane 88.60 40.43 129.04 80.09 1.58 203.23 101.62

Fh = 20 100 10 0
= 20 T

1st Train 2nd Train
Fh = 20 55.4 10 0
= 11.08 T
Fh iin S
Seismic
i i C Condition
diti = 26 72
26.72 T
Page 108
DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48


( T )
One Span Loaded 10.42 0.00 10.42 17.32 4.07 42.39
Both Span Loaded 10.42 10.42 20.83 0.00 4.07 84.78

Crash Barrier(LS) 0.29 1 2.4 0.70 -4.850 -3.405

Crash Barrier(RS) 0 30
0.30 1 24
2.4 0 73
0.73 3 058
3.058 2 220
2.220
Wearing Coat 0.56 1 2.2 1.24 -0.875 -1.083
Handrail 1 1.0 0.28 4.918 1.377
Railing Kerb 0.45 1 2.4 1.09 4.918 5.346
Total = 4.03 4.456
L f S
Left Span L
Length,
h l = 37.81 m
( T )
Both Span Loaded 77.51 93.31 170.82 -26.26 1.09 185.64
Page 109
DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Annexure E
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47.70 m
Foundingg level = 14.70 m
58.88 HFL
14.36

M
Max. Trans.
T s velocity
l it = 3.00
3 00 m/s
/s
Page 110

structure K 2
pmax T/m pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 11.18 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.00 0.00 14.36 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.31 0.17 11.18 2.00 5.39 53.81 210.78
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.17 0.00 14.36 8.50 10.59 42.91 298.66
Total 15.98 509.45

Max. Trans. velocity y = 2.82 m/s
m

structure K 2
pmax T/m pmin T/m 2
m m T M T-m
Pier above
Well Cap
p 0.66 0.04 0.02 11.18 7.20 2.27 53.81 88.77
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.02 0.00 14.36 8.50 1.24 42.91 34.94
Total 3.51 123.70
Pier above
Well Cap 0.66 0.27 0.15 11.18 2.00 4.76 53.81 186.13
Pier below
Well Cap 0.66 0.15 0.00 14.36 8.50 9.35 42.91 263.73
Total 14.11 449.85
Page 111
Annexure F

Actual shift = 0 mm
i) Dead load & LL

(LWL case) = 1384.79 T
(LWL case) = 952.04 T-m
ii) Wellcap
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
(LWL case) = 1906.23 T
(LWL case) = 615.55 T-m
(LWL case) = 1677.54 T-m
Page 112
i) Dead load & LL

(LWL case) = 1384.79 T
(LWL case) = 2223.28 T-m
ii) Wellcap
(LWL case) = 170.24 T
(LWL case) = 109.94 T-m
iii) Well
(LWL case) = 1906.23 T
(LWL case) = 615.55 T-m
(LWL case) = 2948.78 T-m
Page 113
Annexure G
EVALUATION OF SEISMIC FORCES P2
Seismic In Transverse Direction

Live load reduction for seismic combination = 50.0%
Seismic Coefficent = 0.27
Item V T H T At R.L. Moment

m T-m
Dead Load 677.0 182.78 63.01 8829.9
General Item 170.8 46.12 63.51 2251.0
Live load 51.1 13.81 64.21 683.5
Pier Cap 101.5 27.41 59.92 1239.6
Pier 372.8 100.67 53.44 3899.4
Well Cap 283.7 76.61 46.70 2451.4
Well 1362.0 367.75 39.52 9127.3
Total 3019.0 815.14 28482.1
Note : Seismic forces above the scour level has considered.
Note : Seismic on live load has not been considered,, as braking
g has been considered.
Page 114
Annexure H

y thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ((T-m)) @ R.L.
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.80 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.599 0.354 1.999 1.999 8.50 1.6 1.88 32.01 32.54
31.34 28.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.271 0.786 3.340 3.340 8.50 1.6 10.12 29.46 149.31
28.00 27.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.071 0.933 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 4.57 27.49 58.40
27.00 26.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.871 1.081 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 5.35 26.49 63.06
26.00 25.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.671 1.228 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.13 25.49 66.16
25.00 24.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 7.471 1.375 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.91 24.49 67.69
24.00 23.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.271 1.522 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 7.70 23.49 67.66
23.00 22.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.071 1.670 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 8.48 22.49 66.07
22 00
22.00 21 00
21.00 1 80
1.80 0
0.800
800 0 40
40.0
0 0
0.184
184 0.000
0 000 9.871
9 871 1.817
1 817 1.000
1 000 1.000
1 000 8.50
8 50 1
1.6
6 9
9.26
26 21.49
21 49 62.91
62 91
21.00 20.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.671 1.964 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.04 20.49 58.19
20.00 19.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 11.471 2.111 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.83 19.49 51.90
19.00 18.00 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.271 2.259 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 11.61 18.49 44.04
18.00 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 7.84 17.68 23.34
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 80
1.80 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 12 783
12.783 2 353
2.353 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 1 6
1.6 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.80 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 14.911 2.745 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 36.65 16.00 47.50
137.36 858.78
Where,
2
Nφ = ttan ( π/4
/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in
i assessing
i the
h allowable
h ll b
be taken
k as per A
Appendix
di 44, IRC : 78
Nφ Nφ
Page 115

2
From p
upto gm/cm
g 3
gm/cm
g 3
Kg/cm
g Degree
g T/m2 T/m2 ((Z)) m m m T m 14.70
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.599 14.550 1.999 1.999 8.50 1.6 77.26 32.01 1337.17
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.271 54.518 3.340 3.340 8.50 1.6 612.76 29.35 8975.67
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.071 64.729 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 316.75 27.49 4049.85
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.871 74.940 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 370.99 26.49 4373.20
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.671 85.151 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 425.24 25.49 4588.06
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.471 95.362 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 479.49 24.49 4694.43
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.271 105.573 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 533.73 23.49 4692.31
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.071 115.784 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 587.98 22.49 4581.70
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.871 125.995 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 642.22 21.49 4362.60
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.671 136.206 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 696.47 20.49 4035.00
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 11.471 146.417 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 750.71 19.49 3598.91
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.271 156.628 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 804.96 18.49 3054.33
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 543.64 17.68 1618.87
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 12 764 0.000
12.764 0 000 12 783
12.783 163 163
163.163 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 1 6
1.6 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17 36
17.36 14 70
14.70 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 12 764 0.000
12.764 0 000 14 911
14.911 190 324
190.324 2 660
2.660 2 660
2.660 8 65
8.65 1 6
1.6 2541 68
2541.68 16 00
16.00 3293 85
3293.85
9383.89 57255.95
Where,
Nφ = tan2( π/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in assessing the allowable pressure shall be taken as per Appendix 4, IRC : 78
Page 116
Annexure H

y thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T-m ) @ R.L.
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.599 0.354 1.999 1.999 8.50 1.6 1.88 32.01 32.54
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.271 0.786 3.340 3.340 8.50 1.6 10.12 29.46 149.31
28.00 27.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.071 0.933 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 4.57 27.49 58.40
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 5.871 1.081 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 5.35 26.49 63.06
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 6.671 1.228 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.13 25.49 66.16
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 7.471 1.375 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 6.91 24.49 67.69
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 8.271 1.522 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 7.70 23.49 67.66
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 9.071 1.670 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 8.48 22.49 66.07
22 00
22.00 21
21.00
00 1.8
1 8 0.800
0 800 0 40.0
40 0 0
0.184
184 0.000
0 000 9.871
9 871 1.817
1 817 1.000
1 000 1.000
1 000 8
8.50
50 1.6
16 9.26
9 26 21.49
21 49 62.91
62 91
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 10.671 1.964 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.04 20.49 58.19
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 11.471 2.111 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 10.83 19.49 51.90
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.271 2.259 1.000 1.000 8.50 1.6 11.61 18.49 44.04
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.640 0.640 8.50 1.6 7.84 17.68 23.34
17 36
17.36 17 36
17.36 1 8
1.8 0 800
0.800 0 40 0
40.0 0 184
0.184 0 000
0.000 12 783
12.783 2 353
2.353 0 000
0.000 0 000
0.000 8 50
8.50 16
1.6 0 00
0.00 17 36
17.36 0 00
0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 12.783 2.353 0.000 0.000 8.50 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 14.911 2.745 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 36.65 16.00 47.50
137.36 858.78
Where,
2
Nφ = ttan ( π/4
/4 + φ/2 ) 3) FOS in
i assessing
i the
h allowable
h ll b
be taken
k as per A
Appendix
di 44, IRC : 78
78-1983.
1983
Nφ Nφ
Page 117
Annexure H
R.L. in m γb γ C φ KP Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk. Rev. Ht. Width FOS Force At R.L. Fact. Moment ( T
T-m
m ) @ R.L.
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.599 14.550 1.999 1.999 8.5 1.6 77.26 32.01 1337.17
31.34 28.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 4.271 54.518 3.340 3.340 8.5 1.6 612.76 29.35 8975.67
28.00
8. 27.00
7. 1.8
.8 0.800
.8 0 40.0
. 12.764
.76 0.000
. 5.071
5. 7 64.729
6 .7 9 1.000
. 1.000
. 8.5 1.6
.6 316.75
3 6.75 27.49
7. 9 4049.85
9.85
27.00 26.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 5.871 74.940 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 370.99 26.49 4373.20
26.00 25.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 6.671 85.151 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 425.24 25.49 4588.06
25.00 24.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 7.471 95.362 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 479.49 24.49 4694.43
24.00 23.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 8.271 105.573 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 533.73 23.49 4692.31
23.00 22.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.071 115.784 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 587.98 22.49 4581.70
22.00 21.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 9.871 125.995 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 642.22 21.49 4362.60
21.00 20.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 10.671 136.206 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 696.47 20.49 4035.00
20.00 19.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 11.471 146.417 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 750.71 19.49 3598.91
19.00 18.00 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.271 156.628 1.000 1.000 8.5 1.6 804.96 18.49 3054.33
18.00 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.640 0.640 8.5 1.6 543.64 17.68 1618.87
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 17.36 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 12.783 163.163 0.000 0.000 8.5 1.6 0.00 17.36 0.00
17.36 14.70 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 12.764 0.000 14.911 190.324 2.660 2.660 8.65 1.6 2541.68 16.00 3293.85
9383.89 57255.95
Where,
22.5 4, IRC : 78-1983.
78 1983
2
Force = Pressure x Rev.. Ht.. x Width
F W
Design By : KM
Checked By: SP
Page 119
17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48


20.25
HT HL HR At R.L. MT
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Dead Load 182 78
182.78 63 01
63.01 6499 30
6499.30
2 General Item 46.12 63.51 1662.99
3 Live load 13.81 64.21 507.47
4 Pier Cap 27.41 59.92 890.06
5 Pier 100.67 53.44 2615.87
6 Well Cap 76.61 46.70 1474.63
7 Well 367.75 39.52 4438.38
9 Friction force 28.95
Total 833.83 28.95 848.82 18407.31

Net Total 0.00 16860.05

i) Well steining
2
3
Volume
m of
f steining
g = 569.89 m
3
M
Moment
t = Weight
W i ht x (H/2) / Tilt = 360
360.04
04 T-m
T
Page 120
ii) Wellcap
3
3
266.70
iii) Dead load & LL

= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load of Pier
3
3
0.00
V ML MT MR (
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) T-m )
Dead Load 676.97 -51.36
Live Load 62.64 0.00 103.80
Total 2990.7 917.6 18770.4 21912.5
Page 121


20365.19

Steining stresses
= 95.77 + 423.40 = 519.17 T/m2

= 95.77 - 423.40 = -327.63 T/m2


Page 122

R L in m
R.L. γb γ C φ Ka Nφ γxZ Pressure layer thk Rev.
Rev Ht
Ht. Width FOS Force At R
R.L.
L Fact Mom
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.339 31.340 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.599 0.354 1.999 1.999 8.5 1.6 1.88 32.01 8.57
31.340 27.450 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.711 0.867 3.890 3.890 8.5 1.6 12.62 29.12 21.10
14.50 29.67
Where,
Ka = Columbs active
act ve earth pressure coefficient
coeff c ent subject
j to limit of 22.5 0 as p
per Appendix
pp 4,, IRC : 78-1983.
Nφ Nφ
Rev Ht
Page 123
2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.599 14.550 1.999 1.999 8.5 1.6 77.26 32.01 352.01
31.34 27.45 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 4.711 60.129 3.890 3.890 8.5 1.6 771.56 29.00 1195.25
848.83 1547.26
Where,,
Page 124
2.0 Preamble:
3.0 Input : Y
c.g
n
N.A. y X-bar
θin
X X D
tc θout
Ast(outer)
Ast(inner)
Y
2
2
2
2
Allowable compressive stresses in concrete = fc = 150.0 Kg/cm
Design Moment = M= 20365 2 T-m
20365.2

Ast(equivalent) (m2) I(equivalent) (m4)
Total 1.288 8.951
Page 125

c
θout = 1.02
c
θin = 0.69
A x A*x Iself IXX

Outer circle 10 494
10.494 3 044
3.044 31 942
31.942 3 035
3.035 100 259
100.259
Inner circle -1.585 2.467 -3.909 -0.045 -9.689
Steel 1.288 0.000 0.000 8.951 8.951
Total 10.197 28.032 11.941 99.520
4
6.0 Stresses
2
2
= 110.48 Kg/cm
Steel stresses = fs = -34381
34381 T/m2
2
= -3438.14 Kg/cm
7.0 Checks
Assumed Calculated
n 2.043 2.043 m
Actual Permissible.
2
fc 110.48 150.0 Kg/cm
2
fs -3438.14 -3600.0 Kg/cm
8.0 Refernces :
2) Young W. C Roark's Formulas for stress and strain , Mcgraw-Hill
W C., Mcgraw Hill Book Company
Company,
sixth edition 1989.
Page 126
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47 70
47.70 m
47.70 LWL
14.36
33.34 Scour Lvl.


2
pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.00 0.00 14.36 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier 0.66 0.31 0.31 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.31 0.00 14.36 8.50 18.69 42.91 527.21
Total 18.69 527.21

2
pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0 66
0.66 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00 14 36
14.36 8 50
8.50 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier 0.66 0.31 0.31 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.31 0.00 14.36 8.50 18.69 42.91 288.95
Page 127
G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2012_Kopili Bridge\Designs\TTS-2012-DN-17, Pier Well P2\TTS-2012-DN-17, R0, Date 17 Dec 2011 Well Foundation for P2\TTS-
2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Total 18.69 288.95
Page 128
2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48


20.25
HT HL HR At R.L. M
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T ) ( T ) m ( T-m )
1 Dead Load 182 78
182.78 63 01
63.01 6500 02
6500.02
2 General Item 46.12 63.51 1663.17
3 Live load 13.81 64.21 507.53
4 Pier Cap 27.41 59.92 890.17
5 Pier 100.67 53.44 2616.27
6 Well Cap 76.61 46.70 1474.93
7 Well 367.75 39.52 4439.83
9 Friction force 28.95
Total 835.00 28.95 850.02 18530.92

Net Total 0.0 16980.39

i) Well steining
2
3
Volume
m of
f steining
g = 570.01 m
3
M
Moment
t = Weight
W i ht x (H/2) / Tilt = 360
360.20
20 T-m
T
Page 129
ii) Wellcap
3
3
266.70
iii) Dead load & LL

= DLss + Giss = 1170.72 T
Dead Load of Pier
3
3
15.00
V ML MT MR
Sr. No. Description
( T ) ( T-m ) ( T-m ) ( T-m )
Dead Load 676.97 -51.36
Live Load 62.64 0.00 103.80
Total 2967.7 917.8 19014.3 22121.2
Page 130


20570.67

Steining stresses
= 95.04 + 427.67 = 522.71 T/m2

= 95.04 - 427.67 = -332.63 T/m2


Page 131
2.0 Preamble:
3.0 Input : Y
c.g
n
N.A. y X-bar
θin
X X D
tc θout
Ast(outer)
Ast(inner)
Y
2
2
2
2
Allowable compressive stresses in concrete = fc = 150.0 Kg/cm
Design Moment = M= 20570 7 T-m
20570.7

Ast(equivalent) (m2) I(equivalent) (m4)
Total 1.288 8.951
Page 132

c
θout = 1.02
c
θin = 0.68
A x A*x Iself IXX

Outer circle 10 385
10.385 3 052
3.052 31 701
31.701 2 959
2.959 99 725
99.725
Inner circle -1.531 2.476 -3.790 -0.042 -9.425
Steel 1.288 0.000 0.000 8.951 8.951
Total 10.142 27.910 11.869 99.251
4
6.0 Stresses
2
2
= 112.05 Kg/cm
Steel stresses = fs = -35230
35230 T/m2
2
= -3523.04 Kg/cm
7.0 Checks
Assumed Calculated
n 2.028 2.028 m
Actual Permissible.
2
fc 112.05 150.0 Kg/cm
2
fs -3523.04 -3600.0 Kg/cm
8.0 Refernces :
2) Young W. C Roark's Formulas for stress and strain , Mcgraw-Hill
W C., Mcgraw Hill Book Company
Company,
sixth edition 1989.
Page 133
Data
HFL = 58.88 m
LWL = 47 70
47.70 m
58.88 HFL
14.36
33.34 Scour Lvl.


2
pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.00 0.00 11.18 5.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0.66 0.00 0.00 14.36 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier 0.66 0.31 0.17 11.18 3.50 9.36 53.81 366.09
Well 0.66 0.17 0.00 14.36 8.50 10.51 42.91 296.41
Total 19.87 662.51

2
pmin T/m
2
m m T M T-m
Pier 0.66 0.00 0.00 11.18 5.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Well 0 66
0.66 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00 14 36
14.36 8 50
8.50 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00 0 00
0.00
Total 0.00 0.00
Pier 0.66 0.31 0.17 11.18 3.50 9.36 53.81 246.79
Well 0.66 0.17 0.00 14.36 8.50 10.51 42.91 162.50
Page 134
2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48
Total 19.87 409.28
Page 135
2012-DN-17,PierWell-P2(TS),R0 13-01-201220:48

2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.339 31.340 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 0.221 0.000 1.599 0.354 1.999 1.999 8.5 1.6 1.88 32.01 8.57
31.340 27.446 1.8 0.800 0 40.0 0.184 0.000 4.714 0.868 3.894 3.894 8.5 1.6 12.64 29.12 21.15
14.52 29.73
Where,
=γxZ 2 x C For C -φ
φ soil
Nφ Nφ
Page 136
2 2 2
From upto gm/cm 3
gm/cm 3
33.34 31.34 1.8 0.800 0 35.5 9.098 0.000 1.599 14.550 1.999 1.999 8.5 1.6 77.26 32.01 352.32
31.34 27.45 1.8 0.800 0 40 12.764 0.000 4.714 60.169 3.894 3.894 8.5 1.6 772.76 29.00 1198.22
850.02 1550.53
Where
Where,
Page 137

TTS-2012-DN-17, PierWell-P2 (TS), R0, Design of Well Foundation For P2 PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

TTS-2012-DN-17, PierWell-P2 (TS), R0, Design of Well Foundation For P2 PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Sandeep Pattiwar

1. Tilt in River Flow Direction: 1 in 265 D/S

Geo-technical investigation revealed that internal angle of friction, φ, has been

Summary Of Forces At Base Under Various Cases

Sr. Case Pmax @ base Pmin @ base Pallow. @ base

Summary of Stresses in Well Steining

Grdae of concrete M30

Summary of Forces (NORMAL)

Dead Load Reference

Dead load of box super structure = 676.97 ton Annexure A

Live load percentage considered = 100.0 %

2 Piercap and Pier

Piercap and pier in HFL = 322.94 ton Annexure B

Foundation in HFL = 2066.15 ton Annexure C

4 Total Vertical Load

Total vertical load in HFL condition with Class 70 R = 3476.99 ton

5 Net Vertical Load

Moments in Longitudinal Dircetion

1 Moment From Super Structure

Dead Load + SIDL + Live Load

2 From Sub Structure

Moment due to sub structure = 0.00 ton.m

Moment due to Water Current Forces = 134.69 ton.m Annexure E

4 Total Moment in Longitudinal Direction

Total Moment in HFL with Class 70R = 3564.91 ton.m

Moments inTransverse Dircetion

1 Moment From Super Structure

Dead Load + SIDL + Live Load

Moment Due to eccentricity of Deadl Load = 0.00 ton.m

2 From Sub Structure

Moment due to sub structure = 0.00 ton.m

Moment due to Water Current Forces = 520.05 ton.m Annexure E

4 Total Moment in Transverse Direction

Total Moment in HFL with Class 70R = 4035.60 ton.m

Active and Passive Earth Pressure Annexure H

CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with 70R condition )

Summary of loads on well base

1 Net Vertical Load with 70R 3628.41 3669.02 4278.70 5636.40

1 Passive earth pressure 5446.95 28571.81

Check for base pressure

Well diameter at the base (Db) = 8.65 m

Here, Passive relief moment at base > Active moment at base

Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with 70 R condition )

Summary of loads on well base

1 Net Vertical Load with 70R 3476.99 3564.91 4035.60 5384.67

1 Passive earth pressure 5446.95 28571.81

Check for base pressure

Well diameter at the base (Db) = 8.65 m

Here, Passive relief moment at base > Active moment at base

Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( LWL with Class A condition )

Summary of loads on well base

1 Net Vertical Load with A 3655.18 3413.82 4274.34 5470.29

1 Passive earth pressure 5446.95 28571.81

Check for base pressure

Well diameter at the base (Db) = 8.65 m

Here, Passive relief moment at base > Active moment at base

Pmin = V/Ab - MR/Zb

CHECK FOR WELL STABILITY ( HFL with Class A condition )

Summary of loads on well base

1 Net Vertical Load with A 3503.76 3309.72 4031.23 5215.84