Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
It is my experience that proofs involving matrices can be shortened by 50% if one throws
the matrices out.——————————————————————- Emil Artin
Matrix Operations:
• Denote Mm×n (R) the set of all m × n matrices with real number entries.
• (Sum of two matrix ). If A = [aij ] ∈ Mm×n (R) and B = [bij ] ∈ Mm×n (R), then
A + B = [aij + bij ].
Property of Inverse:
• Let A be an n × n matrix and define T : Rn → Rn by T (x) = Ax. The matrix A is invertible if the
function T is invertible. Its inverse is the unique matrix A−1 such that T −1 (x) = A−1 x.
– To show an n × n matrice A is invertible, suffices to find an n × n matrix B such that
AB = BA = In .
– (A−1 )−1 = A
– (AT )−1 = (A−1 )T .
Property of Transpose:
• Suppose L : Rn → Rm is a linear transformation. There exists a unique linear transformation
LT : Rm → Rn , called the transpose of L, such that (L(u), v) = (u, LT (v)) for all u ∈ Rn and
v ∈ Rm .
Cont.
T1A/T1B, hmcheungae Math 2121 Tutorial 4 Page 3 of 6
Example 1
Given A ∈ Mm×n (R) and B ∈ Mn×p (R), prove that
(AB)T = B T AT .
Answer: It is easy to see that both (AB)T and B T AT have the same size (p × m).
It suffices to show the corresponding elements of both matrices are equal.
Denote Xij the (i, j)-th entry of X. we have
Example 2
Prove that if A and B are n × n symmetric matrices, then
Example 3
Let A be an n × n matrix. Prove that
(a) AAT is a symmetric matrix, and
(b) If A is a square matrix, then A + AT is symmetric and A − AT is skew-symmetric.
(c) Show that each square matrix A can be decomposed into the sum of a symmetric matrix and a skew-
symmetric matrix.
Remark:
If AT = A, then A is said to be a symmetric matrix.
If AT = −A, then A is said to be a skew-symmetric matrix.
Answer:
Cont.
T1A/T1B, hmcheungae Math 2121 Tutorial 4 Page 4 of 6
(b) A + AT is symmetric:
(A + AT )T = AT + (AT )T = AT + A = A + AT .
A − AT is skew-symmetric:
(A − AT )T = AT − (AT )T = AT − A = −(A − AT )
(c) A can be decomposed into the sum of a symmetric matrix and a skew-symmetric matrix:
1 1
A + AT + A − AT .
A=
2 2
Example 4
A square matrix A is said to be nilpotent if Ak = 0 for some positive integer k.
Let N be an n × n nilpotent matrix.
(a) Show that I − N is invertible.
(b) Hence show that every n × n matrix can be written in the form B − N B for some n × n matrix B.
Answer:
Idea:
In order to prove I − N to be invertible, one need to find (I − N )(something) = I = (something)(I − N ).
One only have two matrices I and N in hand. And one only know N k = 0. It is a good indication that
(something) should involve combinations of I and N .
Meanwhile, the identity 1 − xn = (1 − x)(1 + x + x2 + · · · + xn−1 ) you have learnt in high school can be
generalized to the matrix version:
I − X n = (I − X) 1 + X + X 2 + · · · + X n−1 .
Cont.
T1A/T1B, hmcheungae Math 2121 Tutorial 4 Page 5 of 6
Example 5
Apply matrix inverse to solve
x+z−w =1
x + y + 2z = 2
.
x + 2y + 2z + 2w = −1
2y + z + 4w = −2
1 x 1 0 1 −1
2 y 1 1 2 0
−1, where x = z and A = 1 2 2 2 .
Answer: This is equivalent to Ax =
−2 w 0 2 1 4
We first find A−1 .
1 0 1 −1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 −1 1 0 0 0
− 0 1 1 1 −1 1 0 0
1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
1 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 →
0 2 1 3 −1 0 1 0
0 2 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 1
1 0 1 −1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 1 −1 1 0 0
→
− 0 0 −1 1
1 −2 1 0
0 0 −1 2 2 −2 0 1
1 0 1 −1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 1 −1 1 0 0
→
− 0 0 −1 1
1 −2 1 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 −1 1
1 0 1 0 2 0 −1 1
0 1 1 0 −2 1 1 −1
→
− 0 0 −1 0 0 −2 2 −1
0 0 0 1 1 0 −1 1
1 0 0 0 2 −2 1 0
0 1 0 0 −2 −1 3 −2
→
− 0 0 −1 0 0 −2 2 −1
0 0 0 1 1 0 −1 1
1 0 0 0 2 −2 1 0
0 1 0 0 −2 −1 3 −2
→
−
0 0 1 0 0 2 −2 1
0 0 0 1 1 0 −1 1
2 −2 1 0
−2 −1 3 −2
Hence A−1 = .
0 2 −2 1
1 0 −1 1
This implies
x 1 2 −2 1 0 1 −3
y 2
= x = A−1 =
−2 −1 3 −2 2 −3
= .
z −1 0 2 −2 1 −1 4
w −2 1 0 −1 1 −2 0
Therefore, the solution is
(x, y, z, w) = (−3, −3, 4, 0).
Cont.
T1A/T1B, hmcheungae Math 2121 Tutorial 4 Page 6 of 6
Example 6
Let A be an n × n matrix with the property that the homogeneous system Ax = 0 has only the trivial
solution. Then A is invertible (nonsingular).
Equivalently, if A is singular (noninvertible), then the homogeneous system Ax = 0 has a nontrivial
solution.
Answer:
Note that Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution is equivalent to LA is one-to-one, where LA (x) = Ax.
Also, Ax = 0 has only the trivial solution is equivalent to every column of A has a pivot position.
Since A is an n × n matrix, this implies every row of A has a pivot position.
This is equivalent to LA is onto. Therefore, LA is invertible, and hence A is invertible.
By taking contrapositive, we get the last if-then statement.
Example 7
Let B be an n × n skew-symmetric matrix. Then A = In − B is (non-singular) invertible.
Note that C is skew-symmetric iff C T = −C.
[Hint: Use the fact A is invertible iff Ax = 0 has a unique trivial solution;
And consider xT x, x = 0 ⇐⇒ xT x = 0.]
Answer:
Let A = In − B, where B T = −B.
It suffices to show Ax = 0 =⇒ x = 0.
Then (In − B)x = 0 and so x = Bx.
This implies xT x = xT Bx.
Taking transpose of both sides, we get
The End.