Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By
D.Malmarugan
Associate Professor
Executive Summary
The unprecedented rise in price of raw materials (cotton & yarn) over the past
few months and also general increase in all other costs due to hike in duty of
petroleum products has made Indian garments uncompetitive in the world
market. While our exports from India are falling, exports from low-cost
countries such as Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia continue to rise. The
slowdown in the global economy has hit Indian garment exports. Exports to
Europe which was facing a debt crisis have fallen. The US market is still
fragile.
For the above said reasons a study on skill gap identification and Training
Requirements was necessary. Apex Cluster development Services , an
Organization involved in developmental activities in the Tiruppur Garment
Cluster handed over the assignment of identifying the Skill gaps among
supervisory level employees in the Tiruppur Garment cluster, to Sardar
Vallabhbhai Patel International School of Textiles and Management.(An
Autonomous institute under the ministry of Textiles, government of India).The
following report is the outcome of the efforts taken in Data collection, analysis
and Suggestions as Training modules in various functional areas for the Skill
gaps in Tiruppur garment Cluster. The report is arranges as chapters in
Literature Review, Methodology adopted, Data analysis, Findings and Training
modules in various functional areas.
Chapter 2
Literature review
2.1 Production processes involved in Garmenting
The various activities involved in garment manufacturing are .
Cutting
The fabric is cut as per the defined pattern for different parts of the garment.
Markings are made on the spread fabric which is then cut/chopped in the
cutting machine. Wastage reduction is a key consideration during this step.
Stitching
A number of stitch and seam types, and sewing machines are used for stitching
the garment.
Name of operations
1 Hem pocket
2 Crease pocket
3 Sew front placket
4 Folding right front edge
5 Sew pocket
6 Attach yoke to back
7 Join shoulder
8 Attach sleeve
9 Top stitch on sleeve
10 Side seam & in seam
11 Fuse collar &band interlining
12 Run stitch
13 Trim collar & band
14 Pressing
15 Top stitch & join
16 Trim upper collar
17 Top stitch collar band
18 Trim band & notch
19 Attach collar &label
20 Close collar
21 Hem cuff interlining
22 Run stitch cuff
23 Turn & press cuff
24 Top stitch cuff
25 Attach cuff
26 Close cuff
27 Bottom hem
28 Sew button hole
29 Sew button
Source: ATDC
Stitch classification is based on the structure of the stitch and method of
interlacing. Machine in each class may have the capability of producing several
different types of stitches depending on the machine structure and how it is set
and threaded.
A group of stitches with specific purpose is called seam, or in other words a
line of stitches.
Seams are categorized into 8 classes are designated according to the types and
minimum number of components within the seam.
Assembling
Assembling will be required for a unit which has a line system of
manufacturing where different components of the fabric are stitched separately
and have to be assembled to make the complete garment. Various accessories
like button are also added to the garment.
Finishing
Finishing involves the following operations:
Removal of excess thread, Washing Pressing/ Ironing and Folding.
2.3.1Garments
In the apparels segment most of the training imparted to workers is informal in
nature. An unskilled worker first works as a helper in different activities of a
garment making unit e.g. cutting, labeling, ironing, packaging, etc. Over a
period of time he becomes a skilled worker. A few units recruit worker trained
through ITI or other institutions. In Ludhiana knitting cluster, several apparel
units recruit teen aged boys and provide them on the job training in stitching. It
was found during the NCAER survey, 2008-09 that in certain clusters, a few
skilled workers impart training in stitching to new labourers on payment during
their leisure time at home. This is also an informal arrangement of training. In
select clusters, Government established a few Apparel Training & Design
Centres (currently total thirteen in number) to train and upgrade the skills of
workers in the garment sector. Recently, Infrastructure Leasing and Finance
Services (IL&FS) has launched a project called Skills for Employment in
Apparel Manufacturing (SEAM), a pilot effort to train and place rural below-
poverty-line youth in the apparel industry. But considering the massive skill
gap in the sector, the efforts are little to have major impact.
Generally, workers gain full expertise within 2-3 years. Scarcity of skilled
workers is felt more during peak season.
processors.
garment.
Quality requirements are all
the more important for Knowledge of international
companies focussing on quality standards is a
international markets. Even significant gap.
Quality control small quality issues can lead
Quality executive to cancellation of order.
Understanding of the
customer requirements by
interacting with the
merchandiser.
Knowledge of international
standards is desirable.
Knowledge of in line and
final quality testing
procedures - ability to
understand and prevent
defects like size variations,
loose threads, stains etc.
20
2.4 Current Training/Education Infrastructure
Human Resource and Skill Requirements in the Textile Industry
The current training infrastructure is inadequate on both number of people
trained and also the quality of training being imparted. Also, very few of the
training initiatives are targeted at the shop floor level. The newly inducted
workers learn through informal training and learning from the experience of the
existing work force.
Training Infrastructure of Textile Sector
Training Institute Number of centres/units
Textiles Research Associations (TRAs) 8
Powerloom Service Centres (PSCs) 44
Indian Institutes of Handloom Technology (IIHT) 4
Weaver’s Service Centres (WSC) 24
Industrial Training Institutes (ITI) offering courses related to Textiles 1,243
Home Science Colleges offering Textiles & Clothing Courses 24
Apparel Training & Design Centres (ATDCs) 52
Institute of Apparel Management 1
National Institute of Fashion Technology 12*
Sardar Vallabhbai Patel Institute of Textiles Management
21
Training in these Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) is mainly imparted in the
following trades:
(1) Bleaching
(2) Dyeing
(3) Block printing
(4) Cutting and tailoring
(5) Dress making
(6) Embroidery
(7) Hand weaving of niwar tape
(8) Durries
(9) Carpet
(10) Knitting with hand operated machine
(11) Weaving of silk and woollen fabrics, etc.
The availability of trained manpower is a key issue for the garmenting sector.
The ATDC, ITIs and NIFT annually train up to 50,000 workers. A few private
sector players also provide training specific to the garmenting sector. A large
portion of the requirement of human resource at the operator level is met by on
the job training. Hence training at the operator level is a key gap. Acute
shortage of skilled man power leads to poaching and acts as a detriment to
spending on in house training initiatives.
2.5 Emerging trends in skill requirements
Emerging trends in human resource requirements
Technology
22
The changes in technology would significantly affect the profile of people
involved. As mentioned earlier, the share of shuttle-less looms in the Indian
textiles industry is only 2-3% as against a world average of 16.9%, thereby
indicating a low degree of modernization in the Indian weaving industry.
Although the Indian spinning sector is relatively more modernised, around60%
of installed spindles are more than 10 years old and open-end (OE) rotors
account for only 1% of total installed spindles. In the apparel sector, India has
much lower investment in special purpose machines, which perform specific
functions and add value to the product. Very few export establishments have
invested in cutting machines or finishing machines. The low level of technology
and government incentives like TUFS would drive modernization in the
industry where as the high power costs would be a detriment.
The technological upgradation would necessitate the human resource to be
trained in modern machinery and also greater in house spending on training.
The shortage of labour and increasing wage rate would further induce greater
automation which will lead to higher productivity. For instance, the operating
hours per quintal of yarn have decreased from 77 to 25 on account of
modernization and would continue to fall. Also, the numbers of people involved
in post spinning operations have come down on account of automatic cone
winding machines.
The modern machinery would require skilled maintenance people who have
the requisite knowledge of the same. Proper maintenance would be crucial as
machine down time and costly spare parts would significantly affect the
performance of the industry.
Quality Processes There would be increasing focus and adoption of quality and
environment related processes, such as:
ISO 9001:2008
23
ISO 14001.
24
and different types of seams and stitches. Although, the industry will continue
to have predominantly line system of operations, designer and high end fashion
exports would necessitate “make through” system of operations which would
require the operators to have the ability to stitch the complete garment. The
availability of merchandising and designing skills would be crucial for
increasing share in export markets and tapping the potential in new markets.
25
The states of UP, Bihar and Orissa etc would be key catchment areas to meet
the labour requirements.
Already the spinning sector in Tamil Nadu is seeing more and more influx of
labour from these states as the current wage rates in the states are very high.
Environmental concerns would affect the processing sector. The effluent
treatment requirements might see units shifting to coastal areas as marine
discharge requirements are less stringent.
2.6 Projected Human Resource Requirements in the Textile & Clothing
Sector
In this section, we shall review the projected human resource requirement in the
Textile and Clothing sector based on the projection of industry size.
26
2. Other related industries such as:
a. Handloom
b. Woolen
c. Sericulture
d. Handicrafts
e. Jute.
While we expect the human resource requirement in the Mainstream T&C
sector to be closely related to market driven T&C industry growth, the human
resource requirement in areas such as handloom and handicrafts would have to
be supplemented by initiatives from the Government and Industry. The addition
of human resource into these other sectors would be at a much lower rate as
compared to the Mainstream sectors due to need for significant support for
earnings, scope for enhanced technology intervention and automation as
compared to current levels, the need to add value, and attractiveness of the
sector among the human resource supply.
Keeping in mind the above factors and the growth of the industry, we have
projected the human resource requirement for the T&C sector. It is expected
that the overall employment in the sector would increase from about 33 to 35
million currently to about 60 to 62 million by 2022. This would translate to an
incremental human resource requirement of about 25 million persons. Of this
the Mainstream T&C sector
has the potential to employ about 17 million persons incrementally till 2022.
2.6.3 . Skill Pyramid for the T&C industry
Given that the industry would required a varied profile of skill sets, the
following figure presents an overview of the profile of skill requirements as
27
derived from human resource requirements across different sectors of the T&C
industry.
The skill pyramid, in summary, captures where the T&C industry stands
relatively in terms of skills (a function of activity, educational requirements,
and amount of ‘preparatory’ time required to inculcate aspecific skill) as
compared to all other industries.
As can be observed, the lower portion of the pyramid, ‘Skill Level 1’, has the
highest incremental requirement of human resources. It requires persons who
are minimally educated, yet can handle simple and/or repetitive tasks (persons
employed in activities such as basic machine operations, knitting, cutting, and
stitching/sewing, etc.). Such skills can also be obtained in lesser time duration
as compared
to engineering or ITI courses. As many as over 15 million persons are required
across skill levels 1 and 2 outlined above.
28
Chapter 3
Methodology
The methodology to be adopted is as provided by the funding agency Apex
Cluster Development Services Pvt. Ltd and fine tuned by frequent interactions
with the team at Tiruppur led by the Cluster Development Manager
Sl.
TITLE OF
No. DESCRIPTION No. of Man-Days
SERVICES
29
cluster and addressing the gap.
3.1 Instrument
30
Chapter 4
Analysis and Discussion
The data was analyzed using Percentage analysis and chi-square
analysis.
31
Table: 1 Departments of the respondents
Department
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
1.Merchandising 48 24.0 24.0 24.0
2.Production 44 22.0 22.0 46.0
3. Human
36 18.0 18.0 64.0
Resources
4.Finance
33 16.5 16.5 80.5
&costing
5. Fabric sourcing 39 19.5 19.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
The above table provides the department wise breakup of the respondents.24%
of the respondents belong to Merchandising Department. Production personnel
were 22% while Human resource executives made up 18% of the respondents.
About a fifth were from Fabric sourcing and 16.5 % belong to finance and
Costing.
32
33
Table: 2 Qualification of Respondents.
Qualification
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.Matriculation
3 1.5 1.5 1.5
(sslc)
2.higher
19 9.5 9.5 11.0
secondary(plus two)
3.Diploma in
8 4.0 4.0 15.0
textiles tech
4.other diploma 21 10.5 10.5 25.5
5.Graduate in
21 10.5 10.5 36.0
fashion design
6.P.G. in textile 3 1.5 1.5 37.5
7.other graduates 119 59.5 59.5 97.0
8.Textile engg.
6 3.0 3.0 100.0
graduate
Total 200 100.0 100.0
Graduate degree holders from streams other than Textiles make up about 60%
of the respondents. A tenth are Higher secondary passed and Diploma in
streams other than Textile are another one tenth and Graduates degree holders
in Fashion Design make up one tenth of the respondents. Engineers in Textiles
are just 3%while Postgraduates in Textiles are a mere one and a half percent.
Diploma holders in Textiles are 4% and Matriculation passed are just 1.5%.
34
Table:3 Experience of respondents.
experience
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1. less than 5
87 43.5 43.5 43.5
years
2. 5-10 years 81 40.5 40.5 84.0
3. 10-15 years 22 11.0 11.0 95.0
4. 15-20 years 9 4.5 4.5 99.5
5. >20 years 1 .5 .5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
35
A vast Majority of the respondents are having Experience of less than 10 years
and half of them are having experience less than 5 years. A tenth are having
experience between 10-15 years and only about 5% are having experience
between 15-20 years.
36
Table 5 Sufficient knowledge to perform Tasks
sufficientknowledge
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1. yes 195 97.5 97.5 97.5
2. no 5 2.5 2.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
Almost everybody are confident of possessing sufficient Knowledge to perform
Their Tasks
37
Table 6: Updated Technical Knowledge
uptodatetechknowledge
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1. yes 177 88.5 88.5 88.5
2. no 23 11.5 11.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
Except for a tenth of the respondents , others are confident of having Updated
Technical Knowledge in their respective Domains.
38
Table:7 Convenient Timings for Training
Convenient timings
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1. Sunday 161 80.5 80.5 80.5
2. Saturday
6 3.0 3.0 83.5
&Sunday
3. weekdays 7 3.5 3.5 87.0
4. no time 26 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
A vast Majority prefer the weekends especially Sundays for the Training
Programs, as they are occupied with their work on weekdays. A bit more than a
tenth are unable to find time for Training.
39
Table 8Production: Production Planning
Production planning
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 52 26.0 81.2 81.2
2. no 12 6.0 18.8 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
About a fifth of the respondents are not conversant with Production Planning
techniques.
40
Ta
ble 9: Production: Budgeting and costing
Budgeting and costing
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 23 11.5 35.9 35.9
2. no 41 20.5 64.1 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
Two thirds are not conversant with Budgetting and Costing methods in
Production
41
Table 10 :Production:Machinery Planning
mcplanning
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 19 9.5 29.7 29.7
2.no 45 22.5 70.3 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
Two thirds are not conversant with Machinery Planning methods in Production
42
Table 11: Production: Layout
playout
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 18 9.0 28.1 28.1
2.no 46 23.0 71.9 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
Two thirds are not conversant with Prodcution Layout Planning methods .
43
Table 12 Production: Standard Alerted minute
psam
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 42 21.0 65.6 65.6
2. no 22 11.0 34.4 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
One third of the respondents are not conversant with Stadard Alert minute.
44
Table 13: Production:Quality control and newly developed Fabrics.
pqcnewdevfabrics
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 45 22.5 70.3 70.3
2.no 19 9.5 29.7 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
About 30% are not aware of Quality control techniques and Newly Developed
Fabrics.
45
Table 14: Production: Statistical Quality control and Operations Research
psqcandor
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 39 19.5 60.9 60.9
2.no 25 12.5 39.1 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
About 40% of the respondents are not familiar with Statistical Quality control
and Operations Research techniques.
46
Table 15:Production:Lighting, ergonoimics and Industrial engineering
plightingergoie
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 38 19.0 59.4 59.4
2.no 26 13.0 40.6 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
Four tenths of the respondents are not familiar in Lighting impact, ergonomics
and other industrial engineering aspects.
47
Table 16:Production:Lean Maufacturing
pleanmfrg
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 26 13.0 40.6 40.6
2.no 38 19.0 59.4 100.0
Total 64 32.0 100.0
Missing System 136 68.0
Total 200 100.0
Sixtenths of the respondents are not familiar with Lean Manufacturing
techniques.
48
Table 17: Merchandising: Prospecting and Vendor evaluation
mvendor
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 32 16.0 68.1 68.1
2.no 15 7.5 31.9 100.0
Total 47 23.5 100.0
Missing System 153 76.5
Total 200 100.0
49
About 32% of the respondents are not familiar with Prospecting and Vendor
Evaluation
50
Table 19:Merchandising:Printing , Dyeing and Washing
mprintdyewash
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 42 21.0 89.4 89.4
2.no 5 2.5 10.6 100.0
Total 47 23.5 100.0
Missing System 153 76.5
Total 200 100.0
51
Printing Dyeing and Washing methods are known to nine tenths of the
respondents.
52
Sketch studying and Garment Construction methods are known to 85%
of the respondents.
53
Department wise costing details are known to about eight tenths of the
respondents.
54
Table 22: Merchandising: Communication, Interpersonal skills
mcommun
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 43 21.5 91.5 91.5
2.no 4 2.0 8.5 100.0
Total 47 23.5 100.0
Missing System 153 76.5
Total 200 100.0
55
Table 23:Merchandisng: Fabric consumption details
mfabricconsump
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 43 21.5 91.5 91.5
2. no 4 2.0 8.5 100.0
Total 47 23.5 100.0
56
Table 24: Material Sourcing: Fabrics, Geographical availability and Price
msfabavasilprice
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 38 19.0 92.7 92.7
2.no 3 1.5 7.3 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
57
Table 25: Material Sourcing: Trims and Accessories-quality parameters
mstrims
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 37 18.5 90.2 90.2
2.no 4 2.0 9.8 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
58
Table 26: Material Sourcing: Interacting with merchandiser for requisition
msinteractionmerch
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 35 17.5 85.4 85.4
2.no 6 3.0 14.6 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
59
Table 27: Materials Sourcing: Negotiating and communication skills
msnegotiatecomm
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 38 19.0 92.7 92.7
2.no 3 1.5 7.3 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
60
Most of the respondents are familiar with Negotiating and communication
skills.
Everybody are familiar with incoming quality inspection, Lot to lot variation
of incoming materials
61
Table 29: Human Resources: Prospecting and selecting employees
hrprospectnselection
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 41 20.5 100.0 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
All of the respondents were familiar with Prospecting and selecting employees
for various
positions
62
Table 30: Human Resources: Various Laws of Industrial Relations
hrlawsnir
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 40 20.0 97.6 97.6
2.no 1 .5 2.4 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
Almost everybody are aware of Various Laws of Industrial Relations.
63
Table31: Human Resources: various Welfare measures
hrwelfare
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 39 19.5 95.1 95.1
2.no 2 1.0 4.9 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
Most of the respondents are aware of the various welfare measure of
employees.
64
Table 32: procedures of Rewarding employees for Better performance
hrrewardemp
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 41 20.5 100.0 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
65
Table 33: Human Resources: measuring performance of Employees
hrperfmeasure
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 40 20.0 97.6 97.6
2.no 1 .5 2.4 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
Almost ever respondent was conversant with methods of measuring
performance of Employees
66
Table 34: Human Resources: Training and Development of Employees
hrtraingndevp
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1.yes 40 20.0 97.6 97.6
2.no 1 .5 2.4 100.0
Total 41 20.5 100.0
Missing System 159 79.5
Total 200 100.0
Almost ever respondent was conversant with methods of measuring
performance of Employees
67
Table 35: Finance: Book Keeping Practice
finbookkeep
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid yes 34 17.0 89.5 89.5
no 4 2.0 10.5 100.0
Total 38 19.0 100.0
Missing System 162 81.0
Total 200 100.0
Book Keeping Practice are known to nine tenths of the respondents.
68
Table 36: Finance: Computerized accounting method
fincomputer
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid yes 36 18.0 94.7 94.7
no 2 1.0 5.3 100.0
Total 38 19.0 100.0
Missing System 162 81.0
Total 200 100.0
Computerized accounting methods are familiar to almost every respondent.
69
Table 37: Finanace: Working capital Management Practices
finwc
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid yes 34 17.0 89.5 89.5
no 4 2.0 10.5 100.0
Total 38 19.0 100.0
Missing System 162 81.0
Total 200 100.0
Working capital Management Practices are known to nine tenths of
respondents.
70
.
71
Table 39: Banking Procedures
finbanking
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid yes 32 16.0 84.2 84.2
no 6 3.0 15.8 100.0
Total 38 19.0 100.0
Missing System 162 81.0
Total 200 100.0
More than eight tenths of the respondents are aware of banking Procedures
72
Table 40: Taxation Procedures
fintax
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid yes 36 18.0 94.7 94.7
no 2 1.0 5.3 100.0
Total 38 19.0 100.0
Missing System 162 81.0
Total 200 100.0
Almost everybody are familiar with Taxation Procedures.
73
4.2 Inferential Analysis using Test of Significance.
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
sufficientknowle yes 86 79 20 9 1 195
dge no 1 2 2 0 0 5
Total 87 81 22 9 1 200
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.829a 4 .305
Likelihood Ratio 3.683 4 .451
Linear-by-Linear
1.247 1 .264
Association
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 6 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .03.
74
Table 42: Significance of relationship between sufficient
knowledge and Qualification
Qualification
higher dip oth gra oth
secon tex er fashion pg in er textileengg
sslc dary tech dip design textile gra graduate Total
sufficientkno yes 11
2 17 8 20 20 3 6 195
wledge 9
no 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 5
Total 11
3 19 8 21 21 3 6
9
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 21.091a 7 .004
Likelihood Ratio 14.076 7 .050
Linear-by-Linear
13.041 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 10 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .08.
75
Table 43: Significance of relationship between up to date technical
knowledge and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
uptodatetechknowle yes 79 73 18 7 0 177
dge no 8 8 4 2 1 23
Total 87 81 22 9 1 200
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.341a 4 .035
Likelihood Ratio 6.694 4 .153
Linear-by-Linear
4.401 1 .036
Association
N of Valid Cases 200
4 cells (40.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .12.
76
Table 44: Significance of relationship between up to date technical
knowledge and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
high gra
er fashi textil
seco dip on pg in eengg
ndar tex other desig textil other gradu Tota
sslc y tech dip n e gra ate l
uptodatetechknowle ye
2 15 7 17 16 3 111 6 177
dge s
no 1 4 1 4 5 0 8 0 23
Total 3 19 8 21 21 3 119 6 200
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.257a 7 .128
Likelihood Ratio 11.185 7 .131
Linear-by-Linear
7.912 1 .005
Association
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 9 cells (56.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .35.
77
Table 45: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Production
Planning Techniques and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
pproductionplanni yes 28 16 6 2 52
ng no 7 5 0 0 12
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.235a 3 .525
Likelihood Ratio 3.689 3 .297
Linear-by-Linear
.881 1 .348
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .38.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Production
Planning Techniques and Experience of the respondent
78
Table 46: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Production
Planning Techniques and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
Textile
higher dip gra engg
ssl second tex othe fashion other graduat
c ary tech r dip design gra e Total
pproductionplanni yes 1 8 6 11 9 15 2 52
ng no 0 2 0 2 3 4 1 12
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.515a 6 .867
Likelihood Ratio 3.728 6 .713
Linear-by-Linear
.731 1 .393
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 10 cells (71.4%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .19.
79
Table 47: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with budgeting and
costing Techniques and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
pbudgettingandcosti yes 13 7 1 2 23
ng no 22 14 5 0 41
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.617a 3 .202
Likelihood Ratio 5.271 3 .153
Linear-by-Linear
.106 1 .745
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .72.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with budgeting and
costing Techniques and Experience of the respondent
80
Table 48: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with budgeting and
costing Techniques and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
gra
high fashi
er on Textile
seco dip engg
ssl ndar tex other desig other gradua Tot
c y tech dip n gra te al
pbudgettingandcosti ye
0 3 1 1 6 10 2 23
ng s
no 1 7 5 12 6 9 1 41
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.748a 6 .096
Likelihood Ratio 12.175 6 .058
Linear-by-Linear
5.882 1 .015
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 9 cells (64.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .36.
There is Significant relationship between Familiarity with budgeting and
costing Techniques and Qualification of the respondent( at 0.1 significance
level)
81
Table 49: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with machinery
planning Techniques and experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
pmcplannin yes 10 5 3 1 19
g no 25 16 3 1 45
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.950a 3 .583
Likelihood Ratio 1.827 3 .609
Linear-by-Linear
.705 1 .401
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .59.
82
Table 50: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with machinery
planning Techniques and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
high
er Textile
seco engg
ssl ndar other gra fashion othe graduat Tot
c y dip tex tech dip design r gra e al
pmcplannin ye
0 0 1 3 5 9 1 19
g s
no 1 10 5 10 7 10 2 45
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 9.093 6 .168
Likelihood Ratio 11.990 6 .062
Linear-by-Linear
7.404 1 .007
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 9 cells (64.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .30.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with machinery
planning Techniques and Qualification of the respondent
83
Table 51: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Layout and
Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
playout yes 8 7 2 1 18
no 27 14 4 1 46
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.316a 3 .725
Likelihood Ratio 1.276 3 .735
Linear-by-Linear
1.140 1 .286
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .56.
84
Table 52: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Layout and
Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
gra Textile
highe fashi Engg
r on
ssl secon dip tex other desig graduat
c dary tech dip n other gra e Total
playout yes 0 2 1 3 4 7 1 18
no 1 8 5 10 8 12 2 46
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2.187 6 .902
Likelihood Ratio 2.485 6 .870
Linear-by-Linear
1.756 1 .185
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 9 cells (64.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .28.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Layout and
Qualification of the respondent.
85
Table 53: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with SAM
techniques and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
psam yes 24 13 4 1 42
no 11 8 2 1 22
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .483a 3 .923
Likelihood Ratio .472 3 .925
Linear-by-Linear
.283 1 .595
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .69.
86
Table 54: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with SAM
techniques and Experience
Qualification
higher dip gra Textile
second tex other fashion Engg
sslc ary tech dip design other gra graduate Total
psam yes 1 5 6 10 9 10 1 42
no 0 5 0 3 3 9 2 22
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8.761 6 .187
Likelihood Ratio 10.857 6 .093
Linear-by-Linear
1.835 1 .176
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 9 cells (64.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .34.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with SAM techniques
and Qualification of the respondent.
87
Table 55: Significanof of relationship between Familiarity with newly
developed fabrics and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
pqcnewdevfabri yes 22 19 3 1 45
cs no 13 2 3 1 19
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.604a 3 .086
Likelihood Ratio 7.370 3 .061
Linear-by-Linear
.040 1 .841
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .59.
88
Table 56: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with newly
developed fabrics and Qualification
Qualification
highe Textile
r gra engg
ssl secon dip tex Other fashion othe graduat
c dary tech dip design r gra e Total
pqcnewdevfabri yes 0 6 4 10 9 14 2 45
cs no 1 4 2 3 3 5 1 19
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.437 6 .752
Likelihood Ratio 3.489 6 .745
Linear-by-Linear
.802 1 .371
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 9 cells (64.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .30.
89
Table 57: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Statistical
Quality Control and Operations Research and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
psqcandor yes 18 17 3 1 39
no 17 4 3 1 25
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.266a 3 .153
Likelihood Ratio 5.603 3 .133
Linear-by-Linear
.526 1 .468
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .78.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Statistical Quality
Control and Operations Research and Experience of the respondent
90
Table 58: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Statistical
Quality Control and Operations Research and Qualification
Qualification
textile
higher gra engg
second dip tex other fashion other gradu
sslc ary tech dip design gra ate Total
psqcand ye
0 6 5 11 6 9 2 39
or s
no 1 4 1 2 6 10 1 25
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.004a 6 .238
Likelihood Ratio 8.865 6 .181
Linear-by-Linear
1.003 1 .317
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 8 cells (57.1%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .39.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Statistical Quality
Control and Operations Research and Qualification of the respondents.
91
Table 59: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Lighting
impact, ergonomics and other industrial engineering aspects and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
plightingergo yes 19 15 3 1 38
ie no 16 6 3 1 26
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.932a 3 .587
Likelihood Ratio 1.979 3 .577
Linear-by-Linear
.074 1 .786
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .81.
92
Table 60: Significance of t relationship between Familiarity with Lighting
impact, ergonomics and other industrial engineering aspects and Qualification
Qualification
higher gra textileen
second dip tex other fashion gg
sslc ary tech dip design other gra graduate Total
plightingergoie ye
0 4 4 7 7 13 3 38
s
no 1 6 2 6 5 6 0 26
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 6.017 6 .421
Likelihood Ratio 7.417 6 .284
Linear-by-Linear
3.830 1 .050
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 8 cells (57.1%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .41.
93
Table 61: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Lean
Manufacturing techniques and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
pleanmfrg yes 14 7 4 1 26
no 21 14 2 1 38
Total 35 21 6 2 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.228a 3 .526
Likelihood Ratio 2.204 3 .531
Linear-by-Linear
.484 1 .487
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .81.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Lean
Manufacturing techniques and Experience of the respondent.
94
Table 62: Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Lean
Manufacturing techniques and Qualification
Qualification
high
er textilee
seco gra ngg
ndar dip tex other fashion other graduat
sslc y tech dip design gra e Total
pleanmfrg yes 0 4 3 8 6 4 1 26
no 1 6 3 5 6 15 2 38
Total 1 10 6 13 12 19 3 64
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.783a 6 .341
Likelihood Ratio 7.347 6 .290
Linear-by-Linear
1.716 1 .190
Association
N of Valid Cases 64
a. 8 cells (57.1%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .41.
95
Table 63 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Prospecting,
Vendor Evaluation techniques and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
mvendor yes 18 6 5 3 32
no 10 1 3 1 15
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.390a 3 .708
Likelihood Ratio 1.542 3 .673
Linear-by-Linear
.126 1 .723
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 1.28.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Prospecting,
Vendor Evaluation techniques and Experience of the respondent.
96
Table 64 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Prospecting,
Vendor Evaluation techniques and Qualification
Qualification
high
er gra textilee
seco fashio ngg
ndar n pg in other graduat
y other dip design textile gra e Total
mvendor yes 0 5 6 1 17 3 32
yes 1 3 3 1 7 0 15
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.047a 5 .543
Likelihood Ratio 5.076 5 .407
Linear-by-Linear
1.934 1 .164
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 8 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .32.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Prospecting,
Vendor Evaluation techniques and Qualification of the respondent.
97
Table 65 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Sample and
Product Development techniques and experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
msampledev yes 27 6 8 4 45
no 1 1 0 0 2
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.294a 3 .514
Likelihood Ratio 2.172 3 .538
Linear-by-Linear
.118 1 .732
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .17.
98
Table 66 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Sample and
Product Development techniques and experience
Qualification
Textile
higher gra engg
secon other fashion pg in other graduat
dary dip design textile gra e Total
msampledev y
1 7 8 2 24 3 45
es
n
0 1 1 0 0 0 2
o
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.706a 5 .592
Likelihood Ratio 4.234 5 .516
Linear-by-Linear
2.392 1 .122
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .04.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Sample and
Product Development techniques and Qualification of the respondent.
99
Table 67 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Printing
Dyeing and Washing methods and experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
mprintdyewas yes 25 6 7 4 42
h no 3 1 1 0 5
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .603a 3 .896
Likelihood Ratio 1.017 3 .797
Linear-by-Linear
.110 1 .740
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .43.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Printing Dyeing
and Washing methods and experience of the respondent.
100
Table 68 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Printing Dyeing
and Washing methods and Qualification
Qualification
higher gra
second other fashion pg in textileengg
ary dip design textile other gra graduate Total
mprintdyewas ye
1 7 8 2 21 3 42
h s
no 0 1 1 0 3 0 5
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .833 5 .975
Likelihood Ratio 1.463 5 .917
Linear-by-Linear
.001 1 .972
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .11.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Printing Dyeing
and Washing methods and Qualification of the respondent
101
Table 69 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with sketch studying
and Garment Construction methods and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
msketchgarmentco yes 25 6 7 2 40
nst no 3 1 1 2 7
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.313a 3 .230
Likelihood Ratio 3.178 3 .365
Linear-by-Linear
2.263 1 .132
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .60.
102
Table 70 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with sketch
studying and Garment Construction methods and Qualification
Qualification
textilee
higher gra ngg
second other fashion pg in graduat
ary dip design textile other gra e Total
msketchgarmentcon ye
0 5 8 1 23 3 40
st s
no 1 3 1 1 1 0 7
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.690a 5 .018
Likelihood Ratio 11.610 5 .041
Linear-by-Linear
8.554 1 .003
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .15.
There is Significant relationship between Familiarity with sketch studying and
Garment Construction methods and Qualification of the respondent.
103
Table 71 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with department
wise costing details and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
mdeptcosttec yes 20 6 8 3 37
h no 8 1 0 1 10
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.289a 3 .349
Likelihood Ratio 4.911 3 .178
Linear-by-Linear
1.419 1 .234
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .85.
104
Table 72 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with department
wise costing details and Qualification
Qualification
textilee
higher gra pg in ngg
secon other fashion textil othe graduat
dary dip design e r gra e Total
mdeptcosttec yes 1 6 5 2 21 2 37
h no 0 2 4 0 3 1 10
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 5.125 5 .401
Likelihood Ratio 5.388 5 .370
Linear-by-Linear
.649 1 .421
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 8 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .21.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with department wise
costing details and Qualification of the respondent.
105
Table 73 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with
Communication, Interpersonal skills and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
mcommun yes 25 7 7 4 43
no 3 0 1 0 4
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.361a 3 .715
Likelihood Ratio 2.264 3 .519
Linear-by-Linear
.246 1 .620
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .34.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Communication,
Interpersonal skills and Experince.of the respondent.
106
Table 74 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with
Communication, Interpersonal skills and Qualification
Qualification
text
ilee
gra ngg
higher fashio pg in gra
second other n textil other dua
ary dip design e gra te Total
mcommun ye
1 8 6 1 24 3 43
s
no 0 0 3 1 0 0 4
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 14.892a 5 .011
Likelihood Ratio 13.130 5 .022
Linear-by-Linear
1.287 1 .257
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .09.
There is Significant relationship between Familiarity with Communication,
Interpersonal skills and Qualification of the respondent.
107
Table 75 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Fabrics,
Consumption Details and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
mfabricconsum yes 26 6 8 3 43
p no 2 1 0 1 4
Total 28 7 8 4 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.508a 3 .474
Likelihood Ratio 2.710 3 .439
Linear-by-Linear
.268 1 .605
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .34.
108
Table 76 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Fabric
Consumption Details and Qualification
Qualification
textil
highe eeng
r gra g
secon other fashion pg in grad Tot
dary dip design textile other gra uate al
mfabricconsum yes 1 7 8 2 22 3 43
p no 0 1 1 0 2 0 4
Total 1 8 9 2 24 3 47
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .801a 5 .977
Likelihood Ratio 1.285 5 .936
Linear-by-Linear
.159 1 .690
Association
N of Valid Cases 47
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .09.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Fabric
Consumption Details and Qualification of the respondent.
109
Table 77 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Fabrics,
Geographical availability and Price and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
msfabavasilpric yes 18 14 2 3 1 38
e no 0 3 0 0 0 3
Total 18 17 2 3 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.570a 4 .334
Likelihood Ratio 5.621 4 .229
Linear-by-Linear
.095 1 .758
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 8 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .07.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Fabrics,
Geographical availability and Price and Experience of the respondent.
110
Table 78 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Fabrics,
Geographical availability and Price and Qualification
Qualification
textilee
higher dip gra ngg
seconda tex fashion pg in other graduat
sslc ry tech other dip design textile gra e Total
msfabavasilpric yes 2 5 1 3 6 1 19 1 38
e no 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 12.562 7 .084
Likelihood Ratio 10.316 7 .171
Linear-by-Linear
5.361 1 .021
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 13 cells (81.3%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .07.
There is Significant relationship between Familiarity with Fabrics,
Geographical availability and Price and Qualification of the respondent.(at 0,1
significance level_
111
Table 79 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Trims and
Accessories-quality parameters and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
mstrims yes 17 14 2 3 1 37
no 1 3 0 0 0 4
Total 18 17 2 3 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.212a 4 .697
Likelihood Ratio 2.647 4 .619
Linear-by-Linear
.028 1 .867
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 8 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .10.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Trims and
Accessories-quality parameters and Experience of the respondent.
112
Table 80 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Trims and
Accessories-quality parameters and Qualification
Qualification
higher gra textileeng
secon dip tex other fashion pg in g Tota
sslc dary tech dip design textile other gra graduate l
mstrims yes 2 6 2 2 5 1 18 1 37
no 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 4
Total 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.467 7 .839
Likelihood Ratio 3.412 7 .844
Linear-by-Linear
.388 1 .534
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 13 cells (81.3%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .10.
113
Table 81 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with interacting
with merchandiser and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
msinteractionmer yes 17 12 2 3 1 35
ch no 1 5 0 0 0 6
Total 18 17 2 3 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.188a 4 .269
Likelihood Ratio 5.816 4 .213
Linear-by-Linear
.000 1 .991
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 8 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .15.
114
Table 82 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with interacting
with merchandiser and Qualification
Qualification
high gra
er fash
seco dip ion pg in textileen
ndar tex other desi texti other gg
sslc y tech dip gn le gra graduate Total
msinteractionmer ye
2 4 1 3 6 1 17 1 35
ch s
no 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 6
Total 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.951a 7 .256
Likelihood Ratio 9.017 7 .251
Linear-by-Linear
2.536 1 .111
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 13 cells (81.3%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .15.
115
Table 83 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Negotiating
and communication skills and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
msnegotiatecom yes 17 15 2 3 1 38
m no 1 2 0 0 0 3
Total 18 17 2 3 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.052 4 .902
Likelihood Ratio 1.425 4 .840
Linear-by-Linear
.086 1 .769
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 8 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .07.
116
Table 84 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Negotiating
and communication skills and Qualification
Qualification
texti
gra leen
higher dip fashio pg in gg
secon tex other n textil other grad Tot
sslc dary tech dip design e gra uate al
msnegotiatecom ye
2 5 2 3 5 1 19 1 38
m s
no 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
Total 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 7.647 7 .365
Likelihood Ratio 7.682 7 .361
Linear-by-Linear
3.121 1 .077
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 13 cells (81.3%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is .07.
117
Table 85 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with incoming
quality inspection, Lot to lot variation of incoming materials and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years >20 years Total
msincomqc yes 18 17 2 3 1 41
Total 18 17 2 3 1 41
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
pg Textile
higher gra in engg
second dip tex othe fashion texti gradua
sslc ary tech r dip design le other gra te Total
msincomqc yes 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
Total 2 7 2 3 6 1 19 1 41
118
Table 87 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Prospecting
and selecting employees and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrprospectnselecti yes
14 21 4 2 41
on
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Qualification
Texti
le
higher gra engg
second fashion other gradu
ary other dip design gra ate Total
hrprospectnselecti yes
1 1 2 35 2 41
on
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
No statistics are computed because this dependent variable is a constant
119
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrlawsnir yes 13 21 4 2 40
no 1 0 0 0 1
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.977a 3 .577
Likelihood Ratio 2.198 3 .532
Linear-by-Linear
1.189 1 .275
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 6 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with various Laws of
Industrial Relations and Experience of the Respondent.
120
Table 90 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with various Laws
of Industrial Relations and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
hrlawsnir yes 1 1 2 34 2 40
no 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .176a 4 .996
Likelihood Ratio .321 4 .988
Linear-by-Linear
.059 1 .809
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .02.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with various Laws of
Industrial Relations and Qualification of the respondent.
121
Table 91 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with various
Welfare measures and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrwelfare yes 13 20 4 2 39
no 1 1 0 0 2
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .463a 3 .927
Likelihood Ratio .737 3 .864
Linear-by-Linear
.419 1 .518
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 6 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .10.
122
Table 92 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with various
Welfare measures and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
hrwelfare yes 1 1 2 33 2 39
no 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .360a 4 .986
Likelihood Ratio .650 4 .957
Linear-by-Linear
.120 1 .729
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
123
Table 93 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with procedures of
Rewarding employees for Better performance and Experince
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrrewardem yes
14 21 4 2 41
p
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
hrrewardem yes
1 1 2 35 2 41
p
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
124
Table 95 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with measuring
performance of Employees and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrperfmeasur yes 13 21 4 2 40
e no 1 0 0 0 1
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.977 3 .577
Likelihood Ratio 2.198 3 .532
Linear-by-Linear
1.189 1 .275
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 6 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
125
Table 96 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with measuring
performance of Employees and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
hrperfmeasur yes 1 1 2 34 2 40
e no 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .176a 4 .996
Likelihood Ratio .321 4 .988
Linear-by-Linear
.059 1 .809
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .02.
126
Table 97 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Training and
Development of Employees and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
hrtraingndev yes 14 20 4 2 40
p no 0 1 0 0 1
Total 14 21 4 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .976a 3 .807
Likelihood Ratio 1.362 3 .714
Linear-by-Linear
.035 1 .852
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 6 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Training and
Development of Employees and experience of the respondent.
127
Table 98 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Training and
Development of Employees and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
hrtraingndev yes 1 1 2 34 2 40
p no 0 0 0 1 0 1
Total 1 1 2 35 2 41
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .176a 4 .996
Likelihood Ratio .321 4 .988
Linear-by-Linear
.059 1 .809
Association
N of Valid Cases 41
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .02.
128
Table 99 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Book Keeping
Practice and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
finbookkee yes 9 19 5 1 34
p no 1 1 1 1 4
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.200a 3 .241
Likelihood Ratio 2.952 3 .399
Linear-by-Linear
1.723 1 .189
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .21.
129
Table 100 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with Book Keeping
Practice and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
finbookkee yes 1 1 1 30 1 34
p no 0 0 0 4 0 4
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .526a 4 .971
Likelihood Ratio .943 4 .918
Linear-by-Linear
.252 1 .616
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .11.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Book Keeping
Practice and Qualification of the respondent.
130
Table 101 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with
Computerised accounting method and experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
fincompute yes 8 20 6 2 36
r no 2 0 0 0 2
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.911a 3 .116
Likelihood Ratio 5.663 3 .129
Linear-by-Linear
3.255 1 .071
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .11.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Computerised
accounting method and experience of the respondent.
131
Table 102 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with
Computerized accounting method and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
fincompute yes 1 1 1 32 1 36
r no 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .248a 4 .993
Likelihood Ratio .458 4 .977
Linear-by-Linear
.119 1 .730
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with Computerized
accounting method and Qualification of the respondent.
132
Table 103 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with working
capital Management Practices and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
finwc yes 9 18 6 1 34
no 1 2 0 1 4
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.024a 3 .259
Likelihood Ratio 3.296 3 .348
Linear-by-Linear
.431 1 .512
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .21.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with working capital
Management Practices and Experience of the respondent.
133
Table 104 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with working
capital Management Practices and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
finwc yes 1 1 1 30 1 34
no 0 0 0 4 0 4
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .526a 4 .971
Likelihood Ratio .943 4 .918
Linear-by-Linear
.252 1 .616
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .11.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with working capital
Management Practices and Qualification of the respondent.
134
Table 105 Significant relationship between Familiarity with cash
Management Practices and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
fincashmanag yes 9 19 6 1 35
e no 1 1 0 1 3
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.682a 3 .128
Likelihood Ratio 3.776 3 .287
Linear-by-Linear
.558 1 .455
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .16.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with cash Management
Practices and Experience of the respondent.
135
Table 106 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with cash
Management Practices and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
fincashmanag yes 1 1 1 31 1 35
e no 0 0 0 3 0 3
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .383a 4 .984
Likelihood Ratio .697 4 .952
Linear-by-Linear
.183 1 .669
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .08.
136
Table 107 Significance of relationship between Familiarity with banking
Procedures and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
finbankin yes 9 15 6 2 32
g no 1 5 0 0 6
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.028 3 .387
Likelihood Ratio 4.153 3 .245
Linear-by-Linear
.305 1 .581
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .32.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with banking
Procedures and Experience of the respondent.
137
Table 108 Significant relationship between Familiarity with banking
Procedures and Experience
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
finbankin yes 1 1 1 28 1 32
g no 0 0 0 6 0 6
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .838a 4 .933
Likelihood Ratio 1.460 4 .834
Linear-by-Linear
.401 1 .527
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 8 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .16.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with banking
Procedures and Qualification
138
Table 109 Significant relationship between Familiarity with various taxation
Procedures and Experience
Crosstab
Count
experience
less than 5 10-15 15-20
years 5-10 years years years Total
fintax yes 9 20 5 2 36
no 1 0 1 0 2
Total 10 20 6 2 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.237a 3 .357
Likelihood Ratio 3.762 3 .288
Linear-by-Linear
.000 1 1.000
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .11.
139
Table 110 Significant relationship between Familiarity with various taxation
Procedures and Qualification
Crosstab
Count
Qualification
higher gra fashion textileengg
secondary other dip design other gra graduate Total
fintax yes 1 1 1 32 1 36
no 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 1 1 1 34 1 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .248a 4 .993
Likelihood Ratio .458 4 .977
Linear-by-Linear
.119 1 .730
Association
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 9 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.
There is no Significant relationship between Familiarity with various taxation
Procedures and Qualification of the respondent.
140
Chapter 5
Findings and Conclusion
Based the Analysis of data, the following conclusions are arrived at.
Graduate degree holders from streams other than Textiles make up about 60%
of the respondents. A tenth are Higher secondary passed and Diploma in
streams other than Textile are another one tenth and Graduates degree holders
in Fashion Design make up one tenth of the respondents. Engineers in Textiles
are just 3%while Postgraduates in Textiles are a mere one and a half percent.
Diploma holders in Textiles are 4% and Matriculation passed are just 1.5%.
A vast Majority of the respondents are having Experience of less than 10 years
and half of them are having experience less than 5 years. A tenth are having
experience between 10-15 years and only about 5% are having experience
between 15-20 years.
141
Based on Chisquare analysis, there is significant relationship between
The perception that their experience and knowledge is sufficient to discharge
their responsibilities of their area of function and the experience of the
respondent at 0.05 statistical significance level.
Except for a tenth of the respondents , others are confident of having Updated
Technical Knowledge in their respective Domains
A vast Majority prefer the weekends especially Sundays for the Training
Programs, as they are occupied with their work on weekdays. A bit more than a
tenth are unable to find time for Training.
142
Based on Chisquare analysis, there is significant relationship between quality
controlling techniques as well as newly developed fabrics and experience of the
respondent.And there is significant relationship between budgeting and costing
methods in Production and Qualification of the respondent. Both are
statistically significant at the 0.1 significance level.
143
specification of Fabrics, Geographical availability and Price and Qualification
of the respondent. This is statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level.
144
Chapter 6
The Training Modules.
The Training modules were developed based on the analysis of data
and the Conclusions drawn.
MODULE 3 – Planning and Execution in a multi style environment within limited time
and resources.
145
– basics of fit evaluation and pattern correction
– identification of patterns, methods of measurements etc .
DAY14 – Basics of Quality
– AQL, Just in time,
DAY 20 – Basics of filing, record keeping, paperwork, approvals and samples, and
professional templates and SOPs for effective merchandising.
146
6.2 Production Functional area
147
DAY IV
9.30-10.30 AM Planning a logical garment construction sequence
10.30-11.30 AM Construction techniques of garment closures: Application of
zippers – fly, kissing, lap; Button and buttonholes, hooks and
eye snaps, Velcro
12.45 -1.15 PM
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Garment quality parameters –
3.15-4.15 PM Quality control in pattern making, cutting and stitching –
Quality of trims and accessories
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Quality control in garment finishing – Defects in garments
DAY VI Industrial Visit – Exposure to modern Testing
DAY VII
9.30-10.30 AM Job order Costing and its application in Garment industry.
Marginal Costing technique for decision making
10.30-11.30 AM Costing in Knitting and Garments– Elements of cost
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Calculation of garment weight of different sizes, Dia
determination, Setting the knitting program, Dyeing program
12.45 -1.15 PM Consumption of fabric per garment- Estimating of cost of
process loss in Compacting, Bleaching, Raising, Shearing ,
148
Printing and Dyeing
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Estimating the Knitting rates- Calculation of CMT charges.
3.15-4.15 PM Cost sheet with Profit margins and foreign quotes.
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM New concepts in costing – Activity based costing – Target
costing – Cost restructuring issues and Cost Reduction
Measures in the textile industry
DAY VIII
9.30-10.30 AM Preparatory processes of woven fabrics – Singeing – Desizing
– Scouring – Bleaching – Mercerizing – Heat setting – Other
preparatory processes – Process flow charts – Machineries.
149
DAY XI
9.30-10.30 AM Product evaluation and profiling.
10.30-11.30 AM Production System - Products and Services – POM functions –
Operation Strategies
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Competitive priorities of textile industry
12.45 -1.15 PM Productivity – Productivity Improvement
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Demand Forecasting – Delphi method – Moving Averages –
Exponential Smoothing –Simple Regression and Correlation
analysis
3.15-4.15 PM Production Planning and Control in textile industry –
Aggregate planning – Master production schedule –
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Material requirement planning – Bill of material – Capacity
requirement planning – Introduction to ERP
DAY XII Practical Training in Garment CAD
DAY XIII
9.30-10.30 AM Inventory Management – Types of Inventory – Cost of
Inventory – Fixed Order Quantity Systems – Fixed Order
Period Systems
10.30-11.30 AM Economic Order Quantity – Other Inventory models – ABC in
Inventory classification – JIT in manufacturing – Kanban.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Manufacturing operations scheduling – Work centers – Work
centre scheduling –
12.45 -1.15 PM Sequencing – Priority Rules and Techniques – Shop floor
Control –
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Facility layout – Process layout – Product layout
3.15-4.15 PM Line Balancing – Cellular layout
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Job Design – Considerations in Job design – Work method
analysis – Work Measurement – Time study – Work sampling
– Work loads in textile manufacturing
DAY XIV Practical Training in ERP Software
DAY XV
9.30-10.30 AM Determination and Description of Material Quality-
Receiving and Incoming Quality Inspection , Acceptance
Sampling Plans, Vendor process capability; Cost
reduction Techniques-Standardisation, Simplification and
Variety Reduction; Value Analysis and Engineering
10.30-11.30 AM Make or Buy Decision, Purchasing Research , Sources of
Supply, Price Determination and Negotiation, Vendor
Rating, Selection and Development,
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
150
11.45-12.45 PM Legal aspects of Purchasing ;Public purchasing and
Tendering ;
12.45 -1.15 PM International Purchasing- Procedures and
Documentation;.
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Purchasing of Capital equipment-Appraisal Methods,
evaluating Supplier’s Efficiency
3.15-4.15 PM Stores Layout, Classification and Codification; Material
Logistics- Warehousing Management, Material Handling
: Cases from Textile and Apparel Industry
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Traffic and Transportation, Disposal of Scrap, Surplus
and Obsolete materials; Inventory control of spare parts,
Materials Information System.
DAY XVI Out Door activity based learning - Ooty
Soft Skills and Management games
DAY XVII
9.30-10.30 AM Introduction to energy management – need for energy
conservation – Demand side management – Energy
Consumption of textile machinery – Specific Energy
Consumption (UKG)
10.30-11.30 AM Cost of energy vs. sales value of textile products
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Energy Conservation in textile industry – Energy
conservation in lighting, compressors and boilers – Energy
Audit in a textile mill
12.45 -1.15 PM Captive generation and different types of fuels – Non
conventional energy Sources – Co-generation
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Types of effluents produced by textile industry – Effluent
treatment processes
3.15-4.15 PM Recent developments like Reverse Osmosis – Concept of zero
discharge
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Water quality and test methods – Quality requirement of
process water and drinking water – Water Pollution –
DAY XVIII
9.30-10.30 AM Effluent standards of pollution control boards – Solid water
management
10.30-11.30 AM Environment pollution and Industrialization – Environment
impact assessment and environment management systems –
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Air Pollution – Air pollution control and equipments in
industry – Air quality monitoring
12.45 -1.15 PM Noise pollution
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Introduction to Business Communication – Meaning and
151
significance – Types – Barriers –
3.15-4.15 PM Principles of effective communication Style of business
writing
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Business letters, routine, bad news, sales, collection and
application – Memorandum
DAY XIX
9.30-10.30 AM Individual; Presentation on Business topics relevant to
Textiles and Apparel-Video Feedback.
10.30-11.30 AM Group Discussions. Seminars aimed at improving
presentation skills.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Individual feedback on Scope for improvement to be
12.45 -1.15 PM provided by Faculty and internal assessment
components awarded on presentation skills
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Principles of non-verbal communication and their application
to clothing styles and body language -
3.15-4.15 PM Speeches, introduction, thanks, occasional and thematic -
Dialoged communication - Interviews, selection, appraisal,
discipline
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Group communication - Structured and unstructured.
DAY XX
9.30-10.30 AM Internal and External Communication of an organization -
Components of organizational communication.
10.30-11.30 AM Report writing - Structure of reports - Presentation skills -
Effective use of audio-visual media .Cases from Textiles and
Apparel
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Conducting Meetings – Procedure – Preparing agenda -
Minutes of meetings – resolutions
12.45 -1.15 PM Conducting seminars and conferences – Procedures of
regulating group discussions.
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Small test / Feedback / Other Discussions
3.15-4.15 PM
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Closing Ceremony Chief Guest
152
6.3 Material Sourcing Functional area
153
9.30-10.30 AM Concept and application of fibre quality parameters of natural
(Length, strength, fineness, maturity, moisture and trash) and
man-made fibres ( Length, strength, fineness and crimp) –
Fibre quality index and its relation with yarn strength and
evenness
10.30-11.30 AM Quality parameters of spun(Count and Strength and its CV %, ,
Evenness, imperfection, hairiness, Classimat faults) and
filament yarns (Count and Strength and its CV % , evenness) –
Yarn testing concept application
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Quality parameters of woven and knitted fabrics – Principle
and concept of Physical testing of fabrics – Fabric handle –
Fabric Inspection – Fabric defects – Fabric grading system
12.45 -1.15 PM
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Garment quality parameters –
3.15-4.15 PM Quality control in pattern making, cutting and stitching –
Quality of trims and accessories
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Quality control in garment finishing – Defects in garments
DAY VI Industrial Visit – Exposure to modern Testing
DAY VII
9.30-10.30 AM Job order Costing and its application in Garment industry.
Marginal Costing technique for decision making
10.30-11.30 AM Costing in Knitting and Garments– Elements of cost
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Calculation of garment weight of different sizes, Dia
determination, Setting the knitting program, Dyeing program
12.45 -1.15 PM Consumption of fabric per garment- Estimating of cost of
process loss in Compacting, Bleaching, Raising, Shearing ,
Printing and Dyeing
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Estimating the Knitting rates- Calculation of CMT charges.
3.15-4.15 PM Cost sheet with Profit margins and foreign quotes.
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM New concepts in costing – Activity based costing – Target
costing – Cost restructuring issues and Cost Reduction
Measures in the textile industry
DAY VIII
9.30-10.30 AM Preparatory processes of woven fabrics – Singeing – Desizing
– Scouring – Bleaching – Mercerizing – Heat setting – Other
preparatory processes – Process flow charts – Machineries.
154
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Dyeing of cotton – Dyeing of polyester – Dyeing of blends –
Wool and Silk dyeing
12.45 -1.15 PM Yarn dyeing
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Woven fabric dyeing
3.15-4.15 PM Knit fabric dyeing
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Garment dyeing – Washing – Stone washing, acid washing,
enzyme washing, bio polishing, bleaching, laser fading and
ozone fading - laundering equipment and procedures – garment
processing machinery.
DAY IX Industrial Visit – Exposure to Dyeing and
Finishing
DAY X
9.30-10.30 AM Finishing of woven fabrics – Finishing of knitted fabrics –
Tubular and open-width finishing.
10.30-11.30 AM Softener finish – Anti-shrink finish – Resin finish – Water
proof finish – Fire retardant finish – Anti-bacterial finish.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Modern developments in chemical processing
12.45 -1.15 PM State and modernization of textile chemical processing
industry
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Finishing: Optical brightening, stiffening, softening, crease
resistant and crease retentive finish, anti-static finish, anti-
bacterial finish,
3.15-4.15 PM water proofing, flame proofing, soil release finish, mildew and
moth proofing – Stain removal, care labels.
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Mechanical finishing : raising, sueding, other surface effects.
DAY XI
9.30-10.30 AM Product evaluation and profiling.
10.30-11.30 AM Production System - Products and Services – POM functions –
Operation Strategies
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Competitive priorities of textile industry
12.45 -1.15 PM Productivity – Productivity Improvement
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Demand Forecasting – Delphi method – Moving Averages –
Exponential Smoothing –Simple Regression and Correlation
analysis
3.15-4.15 PM Production Planning and Control in textile industry –
Aggregate planning – Master production schedule –
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Material requirement planning – Bill of material – Capacity
requirement planning – Introduction to ERP
DAY XII Practical Training in Garment CAD
155
DAY XIII
9.30-10.30 AM Inventory Management – Types of Inventory – Cost of
Inventory – Fixed Order Quantity Systems – Fixed Order
Period Systems
10.30-11.30 AM Economic Order Quantity – Other Inventory models – ABC in
Inventory classification – JIT in manufacturing – Kanban.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Manufacturing operations scheduling – Work centers – Work
centre scheduling –
12.45 -1.15 PM Sequencing – Priority Rules and Techniques – Shop floor
Control –
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Facility layout – Process layout – Product layout
3.15-4.15 PM Line Balancing – Cellular layout
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Job Design – Considerations in Job design – Work method
analysis – Work Measurement – Time study – Work sampling
– Work loads in textile manufacturing
DAY XIV Practical Training in ERP Software
DAY XV
9.30-10.30 AM Determination and Description of Material Quality-
Receiving and Incoming Quality Inspection , Acceptance
Sampling Plans, Vendor process capability; Cost
reduction Techniques-Standardisation, Simplification and
Variety Reduction; Value Analysis and Engineering
10.30-11.30 AM Make or Buy Decision, Purchasing Research , Sources of
Supply, Price Determination and Negotiation, Vendor
Rating, Selection and Development,
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Legal aspects of Purchasing ;Public purchasing and
Tendering ;
12.45 -1.15 PM International Purchasing- Procedures and Documentation;
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Purchasing of Capital equipment-Appraisal Methods,
evaluating Supplier’s Efficiency
3.15-4.15 PM Stores Layout, Classification and Codification; Material
Logistics- Warehousing Management, Material Handling
: Cases from Textile and Apparel Industry
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Traffic and Transportation, Disposal of Scrap, Surplus
and Obsolete materials; Inventory control of spare parts,
Materials Information System.
DAY XVI Out Door activity based learning - Ooty
Soft Skills and Management games
DAY XVII
9.30-10.30 AM Introduction to energy management – need for energy
156
conservation – Demand side management – Energy
Consumption of textile machinery – Specific Energy
Consumption (UKG)
10.30-11.30 AM Cost of energy vs. sales value of textile products
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Energy Conservation in textile industry – Energy
conservation in lighting, compressors and boilers – Energy
Audit in a textile mill
12.45 -1.15 PM Captive generation and different types of fuels – Non
conventional energy Sources – Co-generation
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Types of effluents produced by textile industry – Effluent
treatment processes
3.15-4.15 PM Recent developments like Reverse Osmosis – Concept of zero
discharge
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Water quality and test methods – Quality requirement of
process water and drinking water – Water Pollution –
DAY XVIII
9.30-10.30 AM Effluent standards of pollution control boards – Solid water
management
10.30-11.30 AM Environment pollution and Industrialization – Environment
impact assessment and environment management systems –
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Air Pollution – Air pollution control and equipments in
industry – Air quality monitoring
12.45 -1.15 PM Noise pollution
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Introduction to Business Communication – Meaning and
significance – Types – Barriers –
3.15-4.15 PM Principles of effective communication Style of business
writing
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Business letters, routine, bad news, sales, collection and
application – Memorandum
DAY XIX
9.30-10.30 AM Individual; Presentation on Business topics relevant to
Textiles and Apparel-Video Feedback.
10.30-11.30 AM Group Discussions. Seminars aimed at improving
presentation skills.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Individual feedback on Scope for improvement to be
12.45 -1.15 PM provided by Faculty and internal assessment
components awarded on presentation skills
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Principles of non-verbal communication and their application
to clothing styles and body language -
157
3.15-4.15 PM Speeches, introduction, thanks, occasional and thematic -
Dialoged communication - Interviews, selection, appraisal,
discipline
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Group communication - Structured and unstructured.
DAY XX
9.30-10.30 AM Internal and External Communication of an organization -
Components of organizational communication.
10.30-11.30 AM Report writing - Structure of reports - Presentation skills -
Effective use of audio-visual media .Cases from Textiles and
Apparel
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea
11.45-12.45 PM Conducting Meetings – Procedure – Preparing agenda -
Minutes of meetings – resolutions
12.45 -1.15 PM Conducting seminars and conferences – Procedures of
regulating group discussions.
1.15-2.15 PM Lunch
2.15-3.15 PM Small test / Feedback / Other Discussions
3.15-4.15 PM
4.15-4.30 PM Tea
4.30-5.30 PM Closing Ceremony Chief Guest
158
6.4 Human Resource Functional area.
\
The Training Module for Human resource Function
3. Welfare Measures
(i)Statutory
(ii) Non Statutory welfare measures
159
(i)Training Need Analysis
(ii)Developing the Training Module
(iii) Training Calendar
(iv) On the job Training and Off the Job Training
(v) Training Techniques
(vi) Management Development Programmes
(vii) Coaching
(viii) Mentoring
5. Performance Management:
6. Compensation Management:
Days Titles
1 HRM – Introduction
Business Environment and HR
Trends in HR
2 Environmental Scanning
Forecasting the demand for employees
160
Cost Benefit Analysis on Recruiting
6. Selection Process:
Screening and Tests
Interviews
Cost Benefit Analysis on Selection
7. The Factories Act
161
6.5 Finance functional area
Time Title Resource
Person
DAY I
9.00 – 10.00 AM Registration
10.00 – 11.00 AM Inauguration Chief Guest
11.15 – 12.15 AM Financial Management-Introduction, Overview and
Current practices
12.15 – 1.15 PM Introduction to Book Keeping and Accounting–
meaning and importance –Distinction between the
Book Keeping and Accounting
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM Detailed discussion on various aspects of accounting -
the Account - Debit and Credit – rules for debit and
credit.
3.15 – 4.15 PM The books of accounts - The Journal – The Ledger –
The Trial Balance
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM The adjusting and closing process: Need for adjusting
entries – Types of adjusting entries – closing entries
DAY II
9.30 – 10.30 AM Ruling and Balancing account – Summary of the
accounting process – Subsidiary books – Internal
controls.
10.30 – 11.30 AM Significant book keeping ideas- discussion with
practical examples followed in the industry.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Introduction to Computerised accounting methods
12.45 – 1.15 PM computers and accounting – need for computerized
accounting methods
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM maintaining accounting data base systems- role of
computers in accounting
3.15 – 4.15 PM manual accounting – its relationship to computerized
accounting - advantages of computerized accounting
methods over manual accounting
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM software packages for accounting – significance of
accounting softwares
162
DAY VII
9.30 – 10.30 AM Receivables management- Introduciton- importance-
objectives – cost of credit extension – benefits
DAY III Practical training on TALLY
1. Company Creation and Alteration
2. Creating and Displaying Ledger
3. Voucher Creation
4. Voucher Alteration and Deletion
5. Inventory Information – Stock Summary
164
165
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM RBI credit control Measure
12.45 – 1.15 PM Managerial functions in banks- Bank deposits
accounts- Loans and Advances;
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM Lending practices; Types of advances
3.15 – 4.15 PM Principles of sound bank lending;
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM preparation of reports; credit plans; planning
customers; limits of credit; security
DAY XI
9.30 – 10.30 AM Negotiable Instruments - Meaning, Types, Cheque,
Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes, Features of
Negotiable Instruments -Crossing and Endorsement.
10.30 – 11.30 AM Management of finance: Bank accounts; Records;
Reports;
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Statement of advances
12.45 – 1.15 PM Evaluation of loan applications;
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM profit and loss account; balance sheet and statutory
reports regarding cash revenue
3.15 – 4.15 PM Practical issues in banking – examples from the
industry
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Practical issues in negotiable instruments– examples
from the industry
DAY XII
9.30 – 10.30 AM Investment Management – introduction- Nature of
bank investment; Liquidity and profitability;
10.30 – 11.30 AM preparation of cheques; Book debts; Securities -
government and commercial.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Bill of lading;
12.45 – 1.15 PM Other Banking Services- Foreign Exchange
Management
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
166
2.15 – 3.15 PM Letter of credit.
3.15 – 4.15 PM Purchase and discounting bill
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Traveling cheque, credit card, Teller system
DAY XIII
9.30 – 10.30 AM New Modes of Financing
10.30 – 11.30 AM – Leasing as Source of Finance – Forms of leasing
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Leasing- Current practices with examples from the
industry
12.45 – 1.15 PM Venture Capital –Dimension Functions – Venture
Capital in India.
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM venture capital - Current practices with examples
from the industry
3.15 – 4.15 PM Factoring and Forfaiting – Types – Modus Operandi
of Factoring – Factoring as Source of Finance
Factoring
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Factoring - Current practices with examples from the
industry
DAY XIV
9.30 – 10.30 AM Securitisation of assets – Mechanics of Securitisation-
Utility of Securitisation
10.30 – 11.30 AM Securitisation in India – Current practices
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Banks as Financial Intermediaries.
12.45 – 1.15 PM Role of Commercial Banks Financing/Term lending
1.15 – 2.15 PM Role of IDBI, IFCI, LIC, GIC, UTI
2.15 – 3.15 PM Banks as Mutual Fund and Investment Companies.
3.15 – 4.15 PM Role of banks as issue managers
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Role of banks in corporate restructuring
DAY XV
9.30 – 10.30 AM Taxation – Introduction & Overview
10.30 – 11.30 AM Income Tax Act – Definition of Income – Assessment
year – Previous Year.
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Assessee – Scope of Income – Charge of Tax –
167
Residential Status – Exempted Income.
12.45 – 1.15 PM Heads of Income: Income from Salaries – Income
from House Property -Profit and Gains of Business or
Profession
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM Income from Other Sources.
3.15 – 4.15 PM Capital Gains –Introduction and Overview
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Deductions from Gross Total Income – with
illustrations
DAY XVI
9.30 – 10.30 AM Set off and Carry forward of losses
10.30 – 11.30 AM Aggregation of Income
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Computation of Tax liability
12.45 – 1.15 PM Assessment of Individuals
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM
Practical problems in taxation
3.15 – 4.15 PM
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Illustrations from the industry
DAY XVII
9.30 – 10.30 AM Special features of Indirect Taxes - Contribution to
government revenues - Taxation under the
constitution - Advantages and Disadvantages of
Indirect Taxes.
10.30 – 11.30 AM Corporate Tax- Introduction and Overview
11.30 – 11.45 AM Tea Break
11.45 – 12.45 PM Excise- Introduction and Overview
12.45 – 1.15 PM Levy and collection of Excise duty - Kinds of Excise
Duty - Basic conditions for liability to Excise
1.15 – 2.15 PM Lunch
2.15 – 3.15 PM Concept of Goods- Excisability and Intermediate
Products- Packing, Labelling and branding of
goods- Valuation of excisable goods -
3.15 – 4.15 PM Registration in Central Excise -Procedure for
Registration -Automatic or Deemed Registration.
4.15 – 4.30 PM Tea Break
4.30 – 5.30 PM Customs – Introduction and Overview
168
DAY XVIII Out bound training – soft skills and personality
development
DAY XIX
9.30 – 10.30 AM VAT: Terms and Definitions and Overview
169
ANNEXURE: Questionnaire
Section – A
(Common to all)
1. Name:
2. Designation:
3. Address:
5. Qualification/s:
170
7. What is your present functional responsibility?
(If you are not assigned with any responsibility related to specific
functional area, please mention NIL. You can also add other functional
areas, if you are doing anything other than the area mentioned here)
Functional Area Responsibility
Production
Merchandising
Production
Planning and
Sourcing of
Materials
Human Resources
Finance and
Costing
Any other(Please
specify)
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
171
11.If you wish to update your skills, what will be your convenient timings?
Section B
(For Functional area -Production)
1. Are you thorough with A. production planning,
B.budgeting and costing,
C.machinery planning and
D. layout
172
3. Are you familiar with Printing Dyeing and Washing methods?
4. Are you familiar with sketch studying and Garment Construction methods?
173
5.How familiar are you with incoming quality inspection, Lot to lot variation
of incoming materials/
2. How familiar are you with the various Laws of Industrial Relations?
4. How familiar are you with the procedures of Rewarding employees for Better
performance?
174
3. How familiar are you with working capital Management Practices?
175
References
3. Rehman, Atiq ur and Ghulam Ali (2008). A Study of the Skills Gap
along the Cotton Value Chain:Garments Segment.
Retrieved from
http://www.icac.org/tis/regional_networks/documents/asian/papers/ali.pdf
176