It’s been 40 years since the Iranian Revolution took place that gave birth to a disorder in the Middle East and entirely altered its balance of power landscape. The key players: both Saudi Arabia and Iran have long coveted for supremacy and domination over the other but they have come across an endless conflict that seems unlikely to be fixed as yet. Be it any civil war, uprising or insurgency; Iran and Saudi Arabia always seem to be involved. The real tension began when Ayatollah Khomeini came into power, sparking a rivalry between the two theological states. The Middle East has since been smoldering as this conflict had a devastating effect on the region. What the policymakers must concern more is not the cold war of Iran and Saudi Arabia, but the emergence of a new key player in the region. Alike the radical regime of Iran that rose after ousting the last Shah of Iran; the Taliban are set to plug the power vacuum left after the withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan. They have been successful in bringing the Allied forces to a stalemate despite the military might that the latter possesses. America too seems to have realized the political weight of Afghanistan after losing $ 1 trillion in the Afghan War. Although Zalmay Khalilzad is confident that until everything is agreed, nothing is agreed. Moreover, he also affirms that a complete ceasefire is guaranteed after the withdrawal and Taliban will be forced into peaceful politics. Despite all the apparent diplomacy, the Taliban strenuously want the Americans to withdraw from their homeland at all costs and in future, even if they break their vows, the Americans will be reluctant to come back. The U.S. shall remain coy about the Afghanistan it will leave behind for the region, with the Taliban still not defeated and a hasty peace deal in progress. Presumably, it seems that the Taliban are in want of peace after a long-afflicted war and are ready to negotiate if a withdrawal is assured. Still, the post-withdrawal Afghanistan raises a myriad of apprehensions about regional stability. A shift in regional paradigm can be contemplated and the Taliban will certainly be given a chance to choose their foes and associates. As far as now, Iran seems to have an influential role in bringing the Taliban to the table and will continue to foment a cordial relationship with the fighters. Pakistan, Russia, China, India, and Saudi Arabia will also try to incline the Taliban towards their flank. Conflicts are likely to break out as proxy wars might find a center stage in Afghanistan where the scrimmage for influence and control might dispel the peace. Above all, the stark verity of the Pre- 9/11 Afghan civil war is a lesson for the pragmatic ones. How vulnerable are Afghan forces in the post-withdrawal scenario is obscure, and vital to comprehend before sealing any conclusive agreement with the Taliban. Iran, actively participating in the Afghan peace process has oversight the Afghan Army capability. Iran’s Army is a robust, resourceful, and a potentially developing nuclear power as opposed to the Afghan forces. The Afghan army is characterized by a staggering 47 percent desertion rate of trainees in the US, and 18 percent serving officers as highlighted in the SIGAR report. Human resource productivity and utilization in the battlefield is essential to plan; despite, funneling a mounting $41.8 billion on training the Afghan army, it has withered in war. Their defeat could be traced to the frail Human intelligence resource. In asymmetric (4 th generation warfare) guerilla warfare, technological advancement, and evolving cyber warfare - it is pivotal to equip the soldiers with the expertise, and knowledge to combat terrorism. Afghanistan does not have a NACTA like intelligence apparatus which has coordinated successful operations from Zarb ae Azb to Radd ul Fasaad in Pakistan. Undoubtedly, the NDS (National Directorate of Security) of Afghanistan has the topnotch digital intelligence equipment but lacks Human Resource development for clandestine operations. Afghan army possesses low morale and is financially dependent upon the USA, and other NATO powers. Rife with corruption, nepotism, and ineffective war strategies, the Afghan National Army is imploding under its own structure; a staring reality in this regard is the statement of Major General Richard Caiser, the Combined Security Transition Commander, who claims to have erased names of 30000 ghost soldiers mostly in the 215th Corps of Afghan Army. Fuel, food, and weapons pilferage all amount to the rising attrition rate of ANA as their officers are interested in plundering money rather than fighting this menace. Ghost Soldiers in records are an antic to tax the public and extract money from them even though these are fictitious personnel. Additionally, one cannot plan operations with inaccurate, and unverifiable records of troop strength, therefore, this aids those who are exacerbating the war rather than resolving it. In 2015, SIGAR emphasized upon Audit of Afghan National Army since $300 million was given as Ghost Soldier salaries to the Afghan army which is alarming for the US as well as local Afghanis. The Afghan security forces have to chalk out a framework to keep at bay their adversaries in Post-war withdrawal. Taliban are not the only actors in the war in Afghanistan rather ISIS, TTP, and multifarious movements are garnering for power dominance in Afghanistan. In my perspective, the mindset of the officers, and commanders need to be widened in defense, Intelligence, cyber networking, and war studies through joint courses in foreign institutes in the USA particularly, in context of guerilla warfare. Only after successful reduction in war causalities should the US withdraw; Since it can not only affect the Afghan government but the ample sum of money flooded on the training of Afghan forces would be squandered. Similarly, over 70000 lives of the soldiers along with people of Afghanistan have been rendered in the war against terrorism; such pandemonium could have been averted through timely negotiations. Apprehensions pertaining to the internal strife within the Afghan army fabric will escalate with chances of a renewed hotbed of war. There are numerous families who would not accede to Taliban rule losing their loved ones. An unforgiving and the relentless vicious cycle of warfare would not cease without the consensus of all stakeholders. Russia, India, China, and the Middle Eastern actors all will grapple for supremacy over Afghanistan minerals through lobbying for puppet governments. Today, in Trump’s presidency, America is striking a deal with the Taliban without the Afghan government on board. Surprisingly, the government along with other people with whom the US cooperated before negotiations are all vying for a post-departure political plan which can evolve a perilous hotchpotch of competing parties in Afghanistan. Through history, it is an established norm that the US withdraws leaving behind chaos, muddle, and limb. Developing nations like Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Egypt all left in tatters owing to US involvement in Arab Spring.