Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/316430246
CITATION READS
1 767
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Kundan Kishore on 24 April 2017.
TM
JEB
Plagiarism Detector
y
Cop
Abstract
Authors Info
Aim: M. zapota is inadequately known with respect to its reproductive strategy and functional specialization
K. Kishore*, D. Samant, which are crucial aspects in determining its reproductive success. The present investigation was
H.S. Singh and S. Behera conducted to study the role of floral traits in pollinator recruitment, pollinators' involvement in selection of
Central Horticultural Experiment floral traits and strategies of plants to ensure pollination services.
Station (ICAR-Indian Institute of
Horticultural Research), Methodology: Fifteen-year-old trees of sapota (var. Kalipatti) were taken as an experimental material.
Aiginia, Bhubaneswar–751 019, Floral characters like floral morphology, anthesis, pollen dehiscence, stigma receptivity, pollen production
India were studied by tagging twenty flowering branches distributed across ten plants. Pollination efficiency was
also studied. The relation between parameters was worked out through simple linear regression equation.
© Triveni Enterprises, Lucknow (India) Journal of Environmental Biology May 2017 Vol. 38 361-366
2017
362 K. Kishore et al.
y
traits (rewards) demonstrates intricate network of pollination ovules. To work out the degree of autogamy, 200 buds were
mechanism including mutualism which is considered as one of bagged and fruit set was recorded after 15 days. For self-
the driving forces in the evolution of angiosperm (Grimaldi, 1999). compatibility studies, 200 bagged buds were emasculated and
Cop
Traits like fragrance, nectar, petal colour and structural pollinated with the pollens of same plant on the day of anthesis
modification have been evolved to attract pollinators to ensure and fruit set was recorded. Duration of stigma receptivity was
pollination services (Thien et al., 2000). Most plants show worked out by pollinating emasculated flowers (n = 300) at
moderate to substantial generalization in their pollination system different intervals and on the basis of fruit set in fertilized flowers,
and in fact visited by diverse assemblages of flower visitors receptivity was confirmed. The duration of peak stigma receptivity
(allophilic) that could be equally or more effective pollinators. On was determined on the basis of maximum percentage of fruit set
the other hand, some flowers are functionally specialized and in pollinated flowers. In order to identify pollinators, flower visitors
attract specific visitors (euphilic). The exhibition of functional were captured and identified morphologically under microscope.
specialization by euphilic flowers is considered as 'pollination To ascertain visitation frequency of visitors, fifty flowers from five
syndrome', which is a suite of floral traits, including rewards, different plants were collected at an interval of three hours (07:00,
associated with the attraction and utilization of specific 'functional 10:00, 13:00, 16:00 hrs) on the day of anthesis and the number of
group' of pollinators (Ollerton et al., 2009; Fenster et al., 2004). thrips and beetles were counted using magnifying glass (10X).
Moreover, syndrome also describes the pattern of floral Pollination efficiency of thrips and beetle was worked out on the
ine
adaptation in plant groups to their pollinators (Johnson and basis of number of pollinated stigmas in thrips visited flowers (n =
Steiner, 2003). It has been reported that in spite of the recruitment 200) and beetle visited flowers (n = 200), respectively. To test for
of less-effective pollinators, plant usually exhibits efficient differences in visitation frequency and pollination efficiency one
pollination strategies like high pollen ovule ratio, extended way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed followed by
stigmatic receptivity etc., to ensure its reproductive success mean separation using honestly significant difference (HSD) test.
(Galloni et al., 2007; Garcia et al., 2014). The relation between parameters was worked out through simple
linear regression equation following least squares method.
M. zapota is inadequately known with respect to its
reproductive strategy and functional specialization which are Results and Discussion
Onl
Stigma
Anther
y
Cop
Fig. 1 : M. zapota exhibiting approach herkogamy and restricted anthesis Fig. 2 : Pollen dehiscence at two-celled stage Bar - 50 µm
Sapota was observed to be highly self-compatible, as the fruit set of thripophily and cantharophily (beetle pollination) as exhibited in
percentage was substantially high (>25%) when flowers were Annona squamosa (Kishore et al., 2012). Occurrence of narrow
pollinated with the pollens of same plant. Pollen of M. zapota entrance and floral chamber might have increased plant's fitness
dehisced at 2-celled stage i.e., vegetative and generative cells to thrips and beetles by excluding other visitors who could have
(Fig. 2), which gave an indication that division of generative cell acted as pollen thieves (Endress, 1994). In some of the plants,
might have taken place inside pollen tube. width of corolla aperture is most critical in restricting pollinators
and imposes an adaptive trade off that favours high degree of
Floral traits not only facilitate pollination but also protect specialization (Muchhala, 2006). Presence of floral chamber in
pollen resource from other visitors (Thomson, 2003). It is evident sapota could be an important adaptive character to facilitate
in sapota that floral trait, especially restricted flower opening pollination. The chamber not only initiates the process of floral
might have prevented other visitors possibly from wasting thermogenesis which provides direct energy reward to pollinator
pollens. Moreover, the presence of floral chamber is an indication but also creates barrier for predators (Thien et al., 2000).
Pollen
Stigma
y
Cop
Fig. 3 : Pollinated stigma of thrips visited flowers. Bar - 50 µm Fig. 4 : Thrips inside the flowers of M. zapota
thrips per flower, whereas the number of beetle was relatively less
7
Thrips (June) (1.5). Thrips are generally considered to be ineffective pollinators
6 on account of body size, pollen load and directed flight, which are
Thrips (September)
5 Beetle (June) deemed essential to be an effective pollinator (Kirk, 1997). But
4 Beetle (September) these traits are not always true nor are these traits always limited
3 for thrips. Larvae and adults of thrips feed largely on pollen grain;
subsequent transportation of pollens to stigma was more likely as
2
thrips were highly mobile, whereas Silvanopsis sp. were less
1
mobile and acted as co-pollinator.
0
07:00hrs 10:00hrs 13:00hrs 16:00hrs
The visit frequency of flower visitors showed significant
Fig. 6 : Temporal variation in visitation frequency of floral visitors of M. temporal variation (p< 0.05) as the occurrence of visitors was
zapota significantly high in September (>5). The high rate of visit in
y
September may be due to the prevalence of favourable
17.87 temperature (Tmax - 31.6 °C) and relative humidity (75 -80%).
18 Thrips Reddy et al. (2015) also indicated the influence of maximum
13.85
Cop
16 temperature on foraging behavior and visit frequency of
Sylvanosis
14 pollinator. Thrips and beetle started visiting flowers in the morning
12 on the day of anthesis and continued till 18:00 hrs. However, high
10 visitation rate was recorded between 07:00 – 10:00 hrs on the day
8 4.12 of anthesis (Fig. 6). Foraging behaviour of pollinators indicated
6 2.65 that adult thrips stayed for relatively longer period (>2 hrs) inside
4 the flower, whereas beetle stayed for short spell (data not shown).
2 Moreover, the larvae of thrips were present inside the floral
0 chamber even after the cessation of stigma receptivity. It was also
June September observed that thrips took shelter and multiplied in the flower
Fig. 7: Temporal variation in pollination efficiency of flower visitors chamber and fed mainly on pollens and stigmatic exudate.
Moreover, the presence of floral chamber might have acted as a
12 shelter and breeding site for thrips as in some of the plants,
y = 1.341x - 1.305
ine
2
10 R = 0.846 pollinators are likely to use the enclosed chambers as breeding
Pollination efficiency
8 sites before and during flower anthesis (Ishida et al., 2009). When
pollen delivery onto stigma (Fig. 3) and pollination efficiency were
6
taken into account, thrips were found to be effective by virtue of
4 pollinating more number of stigmas (Fig. 7). On the other hand,
2 Silvanopsis sp. was relatively less effective in pollinating stigma
0 possibly due to low pollination efficiency. The temporal variation in
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 pollination efficiency indicated that September was relatively
conducive period due to the prevalence of moderate temperature
Onl
Thrips/flower
(Tmean – 28.3 °C) and relative humidity (75 -80%) for visitors to
Fig. 8 : Linear relation between number of thrips/flower and pollination
effect pollination services. Linear relation between number of
efficiency
thrips and pollination efficiency (Fig. 8) indicated that pollinator's
abundance had significant effect on pollination efficiency of
2
tube. In such condition, pollen are in temporary dormancy sapota (R = 0.846 P < 0.01).
condition, and the division of generative cell is postponed till
pollen germination (Bhojwani and Bhatnagar, 2008). It may be The recruitment of specific group of pollinator might have
presumed that shedding of pollen at 2-celled stage could be the the strategy of sapota to avoid wastage of pollen - the most
strategy of plants to ensure reproductive success by giving more valuable resource for reproduction. In sapota, thrips and beetles
opportunity to less effective pollinators (thrips and beetle) to carry were the functional groups that increased plant's fitness by being
pollen and deliver on receptive stigma. pollinators not necessarily most effective. Moreover the overall
fitness of a plant is actually a function of all its pollinators, not just
Thrips sp. (Fig. 4) and Silvanopsis sp. (Fig. 5) were the most effective one. As a result, it may be possible to rely on
identified as major flower visitors. However, thrips were more less effective pollinator like thrips and beetle in the absence of
abundant which was substantiated by their visit frequency most effective one as evident in sapota. The recruitment of only
(Fig. 6). During peak stigma receptivity, there were more than 4 Thrips sp. and Silvanopsis sp. as visitors in sapota gives a clear
evidence of pollination syndrome. The pollination of strictly out- Galloni, M., L. Podda, D. Vivarelli and G. Cristofolini: Pollen presentation,
breeders leads to reproductive failure if particular pollinator, on pollen-ovule ratios, and other reproductive traits in Mediterranean
which they rely, is lost or absent, whereas the chance of losing legumes (Fam. Fabaceae - Subfam. Faboideae). Pl. Sys. Evo.,
266, 147-164 (2007).
pollination services in strictly out-breeders is reduced if their
Garcia, M.T.A., M.B.Miguez and G. Gottsberger: Pollen: Ovule ratio and
pollinators are generalist (Ashman et al., 2004; Kremen et al., its relationship with other reproductive traits in some Passiflora
2007). species (Passifloraceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid,
71, 1-8 (2014).
Studies indicate that floral traits like narrow flower aperture Grimaldi, D.: The co-radiations of pollination insects and angiosperms in
play a crucial role in filtering specific visitors (thrips and beetle) to the Cretaceous. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar., 86, 373–406 (1999).
access floral rewards (Fenster et al., 2004). Moreover, the Ishida, C., M. Kono and S. Sakai: A new pollination system: brood-site
morphological adaptations like floral chamber facilitated better pollination by flower bugs in Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Ann.
pollen services by providing shelter and breeding place for Bot., 103, 39-44 (2009).
pollinators. Occurrence of thripophily (thrip pollination) and Johnson, S.D. and K.E. Steiner: Specialized pollination systems in
y
cantharophily (beetle pollination) in M. zapota due to southern Africa. South Afr. Jour. Sci., 99, 345–348 (2003).
morphological adaptation is an explicit example of pollination Kirk, W.D.J.: Distribution, abundance, and population dynamics. In:
Thrips as Crop Pests. (Ed.: T. Lewis). Wallington: CAB
syndrome which may be an important model for convergent
International, pp. 217-258 (1997).
Cop
adaptation for specific group of pollinators. Moreover, pollen Kishore, K., A.K. Shukla, N. Babu, D.N. Sarangi and S. Patnayak:
dehiscence at 2-celled stage, high pollen/ovule ratio and long Pollination biology of Annona squamosa L. (Annonaceae):
duration of stigma receptivity are important adaptive features of Evidence for pollination syndrome. Sci. Hort., 144, 212-217
functionally specialized flower of M. zapota to counter the (2012).
consequences of pollen wastage and delay in pollen delivery by Kremen, C., N.M. Williams, M.A. Aizel, B. Gemmill-Herren, G. LeBuhn,
relatively less effective pollinators. It may be presumed that the R. Minkley, L. Packer, S.G. Potts, T. Roulston, I. Steffan-
chance of reproductive failure in M. zapota is less as plant depends Dewaenter, D.P. Vazquez, R. Winfree, L. Adams, E.E. Crone, S.S.
on generalist pollinators (thrips and beetle), which are common in Greeleaf, T.H. Keitt, A.M. Klein, J. Regetz and T.H. Ricketts:
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile
different agro-ecosystems. However, thrips may prove to be of
organism: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use
much greater importance in sapota due to higher pollination change. Eco. Lett., 10, 290-314 (2007).
efficiency and visit rate. In two lines state relevance of this study. Muchhala, N.: The pollination biology of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae):
specialization and syndromes. Am. Jour. Bot., 93, 1081-1089
Acknowledgments (2006).
ine
Ollerton, J., R. Alarcon, N.M. Waser, V. Mary, M.V. Price, S. Watts, L.
Financial assistance from Indian Council of Agricultural Cranmer, A. Hingston, C.I. Peter and R. John: A global test of the
Research, New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. Authors are pollination syndrome hypothesis. Ann. Bot., 103, 1471–1480
thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable (2009).
suggestions and comments. Reddy, P.V.R., T. Rashmi and A. Verghese: Foraging activity of Indian
honey bee, Apis cerena in relation to ambient climate variables
References under tropical conditions. J. Environ. Bio., 36, 577-581 (2015).
Sakai, S.: A review of brood-site pollination mutualism: plants providing
Ashman, T.L., T.M. Knight, J.A. Steets, P. Amarasekare, M. Burd, D.R. breeding sites for their pollinators. J. Pl. Res., 115, 161–168
Onl
Campbell, M.R. Dudash, M.O. Johnston, S.J. Mazer, R.J. Mitchel, (2002).
M.T. Morgan and W.G. Wilson: Pollen limitation of plant Stefan, G.M. and D. Walter: Pollination mode and life form strongly affect
reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and the relation between mating system and pollen to ovule ratios. New
consequences. Ecology, 85, 2408-2421 (2004). Phytolog., 183, 470-479 (2009).
Bhojwani, S.S. and S.P. Bhatnagar: The Embryology of Angiosperm. Thien, L.B., H. Azuma and S. Kawano: New perspectives on the
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited, New Delhi, p. 368 (2008). pollination biology of basal angiosperms. Int. J. Pl. Sci., 161,
Endress, P.K.: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. S225–S235 (2000).
Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 511 (1994). Thomson, J.D.: When is it mutualism? The Am. Natural., 162, S1–S9
Fenster, C.B., W.S. Armbruster, P. Wilson, M.R. Dudash and J.D. (2003).
Thomson: Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Ann. Wang, Y., D. Zhang and Z. Chen: Pollen histochemistry and pollen: Ovule
Rev. Eco. Evo. Syst., 35, 375-403 (2004). ratios in Zingiberaceae. Ann. Bot., 94, 583-591 (2004).