Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CAPA:
Systemic & Cost Effective
Christopher Parker – March, 2009
Course Objectives
Why are Analysis skills important?
The Need for Improvement
Change the Process to Change the
Results
Benefits of Process Improvement
Proactive versus Reactive Improvement
Analysis Hierarchy
The importance of CAPA
7D Model and Activities
7D Model and DMAIC
7D Model and PDCA
Problem Description
Containment
Investigate & Define Root Cause
Tools
Initial Corrective Action Exercises
Permanent Corrective Action Example
Verification Other examples
Proactive Improvement Excercise
Summary
Nature of Business
• Very competitive
Continuous Improvement
Ongoing recognition of opportunities to improve
Problem Solving
Solution oriented effort for specific
concerns or issues
Failure Analysis
Technical examination and very focused effort on failed devices to identify
specific details of a very specific concern or issue
7. Realize
and
Benefits
6. Standardize
Reflect on the
Improvement and Control
Process
K
2. Improvement
Measure 4. Plan &
Select a the Implement
AC
N Problem
Problem
T
A Improvement
PL
4
5
6
7
Every effort and priority must be made to identify and detain any
impacted material or processes.
Have all inventory locations of the risk material been identified?
(incoming, returns, stock, kits, WIP, finished goods, shipped product…)
Be specific as to how much material, B\L, location, and where it is now.
Assure that the material is prevented from accidental use.
Has the process been stopped pending review and evaluation?
If elements are performed in stages or pieces, edit the CAPA record with each detail as it is
available, such as: 04-AUG (CWP) Moved B\L 23647 to HOLD
I was on
vacation
No procedures
Customer is too
demanding
The supplier
No training
The Production
team
You are …
Poor
communication
•
•
•
• •
• … and others
•
• • • •
•
•
NPI
Correct process Change
quantity control
Defect X X
free
100 X 75 50 25 25 50X 75 100
FMEA & Control Plans Control Charts
Customer
Requirement X
Performance X
X
On time X Inventory
delivery management
⎡USL − u x LSL − u x ⎤
RMA frequency
Cpk = Z min ⎢ , ⎥
⎣⎢ 3σ x 3σ x ⎦⎥ Radar (Spider) Chart
Capability
Hypothesis Testing
Failure Analysis
If elements are performed in stages or pieces, edit the CAPA record with each
detail as it is available, such as: 04-AUG (CWP)
1. A systemic definition
2. That is sustainable
3. And be preventive in nature
5 Assess Effectiveness
Problem Description:
Required Certificate of Compliance (CoC) documents from suppliers are
not included in as much as 35% of all required receipts. Leading to
non-value-add activity to attain the CoC, inspection delays, and in
some cases, negatively impacting production.
Two CAPA paths:
CAPA – Address reasoning for lack of inclusion in shipments as
required.
CAPA+ - Address why CoC is required and eliminate the need where
there is no value-added in the system.
Exercise Description:
1. Begin exploring improvement opportunities by listing your core
products or services – outputs. (departmental or individual)
2. Relate the products or services to the processes by listing the
processes that generate them.
3. On a 1 to 10 scale, in the eyes of your customer, rank the criticality of
your products or services. (10 is most critical)
4. On a 1 to 10 scale estimate your current process performance.
(10 is the best)