Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1993
Abstract. A complete catalogue is provided of the type specimens of caecilians and salamanders in
the herpetological collections of the Zoological Museum, Berlin as of September, 1992. Excluding
putative types of questionable status, the collection contains 15 caecilian type specimens representing
13 taxa (9 presently regarded as valid) and 58 salamander type specimens representing 22 taxa (12 of
which are regarded as valid). An additional eight named taxa were represented in the ZMB collections
by type material that has been lost.
Key words: Amphibia; Caudata; Gymnophiona; type catalogue; Zoological Museum, Berlin
The amphibian and reptile collections of the Zoological Museum, Berlin, include a large
number of types representing most major groups, largely stemming from the work of
WILHELMPETERS. Thus caecilians, which were of special interest to PETERSand later to
FRITZNIEDEN,are well represented by primary types. PETERS’(1880) major work on
caecilians has been regarded by TAYLOR (1968) as one of the most significant contributions
to gymnophione systematics. PETERS (1880) recognized 11 genera (all of which are still
considered valid) and 31 species. NIEDEN(1913) continued caecilian research at Berlin and
produced the first treatment of the group in the series “Das Tierreich”, in which he
recognized 56 species in 19 genera. TORNIER and AHL also published on the group. Thus,
prior to the work of EDWARDTAYLOR, the Zoological Museum, Berlin, served as the
primary focus for systematic work on the Gymnophiona in central Europe. The ZMB
collection currently includes 15 type specimens of caecilians (six holotypes, one lectotype,
five syntypes, three paratypes) representing 13 named taxa, nine of which are presently
regarded as valid at the specific level. Four holotypes that were at one time catalogued
into the ZMB collections could not be located.
In contrast to caecilians, salamanders were not intensively studied by PETERS or his
successors and consequently most ZMB salamander types are paratypes or syntypes. Among
these are historically important Japanese specimens from VON SIEBOLD’S journey that
were described by TEMMINCK & SCHLECEL (1838). The ZMB collections include 58 type
specimens of salamanders (nine holotypes, one lectotype, 32 syntypes, seven paralectotypes,
nine paratypes), representing 22 named taxa, 12 of which are presently regarded as
valid at the specific level. Two additional holotypes have been lost from the collection.
Several salamander taxa are represented by putative syntypes or paratypes in the ZMB
collection.
The format of this catalogue follows that of the earlier gekkonid (BAUER& GUNTHER,
1991)and anguimorph (GOODet al. 1993) catalogues. Abbreviations and museum acronyms
286 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
follow LEVITON et al. (1985). The following acronyms, not used in the earlier catalogues,
are employed here :
Gymnophiona
Caeciliidae
Ho lot y p e: ZMB 29988, adult; “Seychellen”; coll./don. [crew of] S.M.S. Planet; 1904.
P a r a t y p e : ZMB 10407, fetus; “Zanzibar” [Tanzania] (in error, see Remarks); coll. Sir
J. KIRK,don. British Museum (Natural History).
288 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
Ichthyophiidae
P a r a t y p e : ZMB 9829, juvenile (TL 219 mm); “Malabar” [Kerala, India]; coll./don.
R. H. BEDDOME.
R e m a r k s : The holotype (BMNH 82.12.12.6) is from “Malabar, India”. The second paratype is
MCZ 1273 from “near Madras, India”.
Remarks: Much confusion has surrounded the ZMB catalogue designation for this specimen.
TAYLOR,in the species description (1960) and subsequently (TAYLOR1961, 1968) incorrectly listed
the ZMB paratype as ZMB 2574. In one of these publications (TAYLOR 1961) the same specimen was
referred to as ZMB 3574. The specimen ist, in fact, not registered in the main ZMB catalogue. Rather,
it appears in the “c-register”, which includes primarily specimens that were never formally entered
into the Berlin collection. In this register the more detailed locality “zwischen Kurseong und Siliguri
[Terrai] in Sikkim” is given. The holotype (CAS 64216) is from “Darjeeling, India”. Other paratypes
are BMNH 87.1 1.2.28 from “Darjeeling, Bengal, India”, and MCZ 2685 from “Rungeet Valley, British
Sikkim”.
Typhlonectidae
Holo type: ZMB 9092, juvenile; “Angostura (Ciudad Dolivar) am Orinoco” [ = Ciudad
Bolivar, Venezuela]; coll. Dr. SACHS.
Syntypes: ZMB 9522-3, adults; “aus dem Cauca, NebenfluD mit festem Kiesgrund des
Magdalenenflusses, Neu Granada” [Colombia]; coll./don. T. GROSSKOPF,
1879.
R e m a r k s : In the type description this taxon appears under the heading Typhlonectes natans, although
PETERS (1880) listed Caecilia natans, the name used by FISCHER(1880) as a synonym. FISCHER (1 880)
mentioned five additional ZMB specimens of this taxon, as well as a single specimen in Hamburg
(ZMH), but, as indicated by TAYLOR(1968) the type description was based on only the two ZMB
specimens collected by GROSSKOPF. In addition to ZMB 9522-9523, DUNN (1942) listed ZMB 3772,
AMNH 23486, and BMNH 81.4.9.5 as type material. The number ZMB 3772, however, is carried by
a snake.
290 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
Caudata
Cryptobranchidae
Paralectotype: ZMB 30646, adult; “dans les montagnes klevkes de l’ile Nippon, situke
entre les 34 A 36 degrks de latitude borkale” [Japan]; coll./don. P. F. VON SIEBOLD
and VON
ZASTROW.
Mitt. Zool. Mus. Bed. 69 (1993) 2 291
(I 836: xxvi)
Trifon japonicus TEMMINCK
Hynobiidae
Hynobius naevius see Salamandra naevia
Salamandra naevia TEMMINCK (1838: 122, p. 4, figs. 4-6, pl. 5, figs. 9- 10)
& SCHLEGEL
(ZMUC), although HOOGMOED (1978), pending evidence to the contrary, did not consider this material
as part of the type series. The transactions leading to the distribution of two other probable
paralectotypes, CAS 64467-8 (SLEVIN1937), likewise could not be traced (HOOGMOED 1978), although
CAS records indicate that the specimens were received on December 3 1, 1923 and that they originated
from VON SIEBOLD’S Japanese collection. NMW 22907 has also been considered as part of the type
series (HAUPL& TIEDEMANN 1978), although no prior evidence of the exchange of Leiden Japanese
salamander types to Vienna exists. THORN (1969) regarded “Mimasaku, Bizen, Okayama” as the type
locality. The smaller of the two ZMB paralectotypes has been extensively dissected.
& SCHLEGEL,
Present name: Hynobius nebulosus (TEMMINCK 1838)
Remarks: The description gives no type locality, although “mont Mitsjama . . . situks dans les
environs de Nagasaki” and “mont Hokwasan prts de Nagasaki” were mentioned as known sites where
the species occurred. THORN(1969) regarded the former site as the type locality. VON SIEBOLD and
BURGERwere mentioned as collectors of the types in the description. HOOGMOED (1978: 100) designated
RMNH 2307A as a lectotype and confirmed that two specimens from the type series were sent by
SCHLEGEL to Berlin in 1849. Other paralectotypes are RMNH 2307,2309 (20 specimens) (HOOGMOED
1978), MNHN4691, 4691A (THIREAU1986) and BMNH (2 specimens) (GRAY1850; BOULENGER
1882). STEJNECER(1907) and DUNN(1923) also reported type material in ZMUC and SMF, although
these have not been recognized as paralectotypes by HOOGMOED (1978). DUNN(1927) also reported
a putative type in the collections of the California Academy of Sciences. In fact, two speciemens,
CAS 64469-70, are present. The route of this specimen from Leiden to San Fransisco could not be
determined by H ~ ~ G M O (1978),
ED but CAS records show that the specimens were catalogued as
syntypes when they were received in 1923.
Paralectotype: ZMB 3633, larva; “les contrbes montueses des iles Nippon [Honshu]
et Sikok [Sikoku], particulikrement dans les provinces Sagami, Sinano, Tanba, Tazima et
Tosa, situbs entre les 33 et 36 degrbs de latitude borbale [and] . . . les monts Fakone”; exch.
H. SCHLEGEL (RMNH ); 1849.
R e m a r k s : VON SIEBOLD
is mentioned in the description as the sole collector. HOOGMOED(1978: 97)
designated RMNH 2292A as a lectotype and confirmed that three specimens from the type series of
this species were sent by SCHLEGEL to Berlin in 1849. Of the two ZMB specimens not present, one
(formerly also catalogued as ZMB 3633) was exchanged to W. BISCHOFF,then of KHMM, in 1975.
The whereabouts of the third specimen is unknown. Additional paralectotypes are RMNH 2289 (20
specimens), 2290 (8 specimens), 2291 (7 specimens), 2292 (3 specimens in addition to the lectotype)
and 18560 (HOOGMOED 1978), MNHN4692 (THIREAU1986), BMNH (2 specimens) (GRAY1850)
and MCZ 21320 (formerly part of RMNH 2290) (BARBOUR & LOVERIDGE 1946).
Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl. 69 (1993) 2 293
Syntypes: ZMB 6877, 3 adults; ZMB 7818, 4 specimens; “Kurluk” [probably Kurluga
in the Yablonovy Khrebet, Russia]; coll./don. TACZANOWSKI [ = CZEKANOWSKI] & B.
DYBOWSKY; exch. A. STRAUCH(ZIL).
R e m a r k s : DYBOWSKY’S(1870) description mentions that hundreds of specimens were known to him,
although measurements were provided for only five. CZEKANOWSKI is mentioned as a collector of
some of the material. The localities specifically mentioned in the type description are “siidwestlicher
Winkel Baikals”, “auf den morastigen Uferwiesen der Kultuschnaja- und Pachabicha-Thder” and “in
Taurien hinter der Jablonna-Gebirgskette auf feuchten Wiesen des Ingoda-Systems”. BRAME(in FROST,
1985) stated that the types of this taxon had not been traced, but that ZIL 1482 (four specimens)
collected by D~BOWSKY and received from the Warsaw Museum in 1871 probably constitute part of
the type series. AMNH 23495 is also a syntype and was received by exchange from the ZMB collection
in 1925. The specimen is also from “Kurluk” and was certainly derived from one of the existing series
of Berlin specimens. See also Zsodactyliurn Wosnessenskyi in APPENDIX I .
Plethodontidae
( 1930: 150)
Oedipus macrinii LAFRENTZ
Para t y p e s : ZMB 33693, adult male and female; “Cerro Espino, 1000 m hoch, sub-
tropischer Laubwald am Sudhang der Sierra Madre del Sur, bei Concordia, Staat Oaxaca,
Mexiko”; coll./don. K. LAFRENTZ; 31. XII. 1930.
R e m a r k s : The holotype was KHMM N.V.52/29 and was destroyed during World War I1 (fide
PAPENFUSS et al. 1984). These specimens are listed in the ZMB catalogue as cotypes and, as indicated
by PAPENFUSS et al. (1984), are available for neotype designation.
Plethodon yonahlossee D u ” (1917: 598; pl. 57, figs. 1-3; text fig. 1)
Paratype : ZMB 29832, juvenile; Linville, North Carlina [United States of America]
(locality from ZMB catalogue and jar label); coll. E. R. DUNN:1916; exch. G. K. NOBLE
(AMNH); 1925.
Remarks: The holotype is AMNH 4634 from “near the Yonahlossee Road about 1 1/2 miles from
Linville, N.C., altitude 4200 feet. “The original type series consisted of AMNH 4633-44,4666-7,4711-4,
and 4853-6 ( D u ” 1917). The ZMB paratype originally bore the number AMNH 4639. Two additional
specimens from the United States National Museum (USNM 36397-8) were mentioned in the
description, but were referred to as specimens examined in addition to the type series. The status of
these specimens as paratypes remains open to question, but they have been treated as such by subsequent
authors (e.g. COCHRAN 1961).0ther specimens that have been regarded as paratypes are MCZ 4892-3
(BARBOUR & LOVERIDGE 1929)and NMW 22863 (HAUPL& TIEDEMANN 1978).ZMB 29887 was received
through exchange from Harvard (original number MCZ 6160) as a paratype. The specimen was
collected by D u ” on July 10, 1909 at White Top Mt., Virginia. There is no indication from the
type description that this specimen constitutes part of the type series.
Holotype: ZMB 6556, juvenile; “Hayti” [Haiti, in error, see Remarks]; purch. Mus.
Godeffroy.
Lect o t y p e: (here designated) ZMB 7736A, adult; “Chiriqui” [Panama]; coll. H. RIBBE.
Ho lot y p e: ZMB 9518, juvenile; “Laceres am Cauca, einem Nebenfluss des Magdalen-
stroms in der Provinz Antioquia (Neu Granada)” [ = Caceres, Colombia]; coll. T. GROSS-
KOPF.
Salamandridae
R e m a r k s : MNHN 1182 and l182A (formerly 1865-37) are also syntypes (BUSACK1976; THIREAU
1986). The type description gives measurements for only one specimen, although many individuals
were examined in the preparation of the description. The individual measured probably was housed
in the Lisbon Museum and would have been destroyed by fire in 1975. BUSACK(1976) discussed the
citation of the description, stating that BOCAGE
(1864a) was actually published subsequent to BOCAGE
(1864b), and that the latter paper should be considered the authority for the name. THIREAU (l986),
however, correctly stated that the BOCAGE(1864a) appeared in August and BOCAGE(1864b) was
published in November of the same year.
296 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
Paratypes: ZMB 15711, adult male and female; “Potenza di Basilicata” [822m elev.,
tide PERACCA
1898b, Italy]; coll./don. M. G. PERACCA,
March 1898.
Remarks: Additional type material originates from “ S . Cataldo, che e a 12 k. da Lecce” Italy and
includes BMNH 1946.9.5.93-99, 1946.9.6.1-7, NMW 22877.1-2, 22878: 1-7 (HAUPL& TIEDEMANN,
1978), MCZ 7366-7 (BARBOUR & LOVERIDGE, 1929) and MSNTO An583 (formerly 2605), An589
(formerly 2443), An590 (formerly 2441) (ELTER1981; BRAMEin FROST 1985).
Holotype: ZMB 34087, adult male; “Kwangsi” [= Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Re-
gion, China]; coll./don. SHIN[= S. S. SIN].
Remarks: The original data with the specimens give the locality as “Yao Shan [ = Mt. Yao], Kwangsi
Prov. [ = Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region], China”. FAN(1931) provided additional details of
the collecting trip suggesting that the village of Loshiang or its vicinity was the probable collection
site of the types. In the paratype of intermediate size the head has been dissected.
Remarks: Neither the ZMB catalogues nor the jar label provides any confirmation of the type status
of this specimen, however, the measurements match those provided in the description. Five additional
specimens from the same collector, also with the locality “ L O W are also present in the collections
(ZMB 35458 - 7. IX. 1930; ZMB 35454 - 11. X. 1930; ZMB 35388-9 - no date; ZMB 35409 -
11. VIII. 1939).It is unclear if any of these specimens should also be considered as part of the type series.
Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl. 69 (1993) 2 297
Salamandra salamandra terrestris see Salamandra salamandra forma francica and Salaman-
dra salamandra thuringica in APPENDIX I1
H o l o t y p e : ZMB 10559, adult; “auf dem Pelion in Griechenland” [= Mt. Pilion, near
Volos, Thessaly, Greece]; E. STOLZLOF and VON HELDREICH.
Remarks: The specimen jar and ZMB catalogues provided no statement as to the type status of this
& GRILLITSCH
specimen. GRILLITSCH (1991) reevaluated the systematic status of this form, but did not
examine the type.
Syntypes: ZMB 37723, 2 adults; “Litzelhoferlaake zwischen Stagor (2288 m) und dem
Tor1 (2152 m) in SO der Kreuzeck-Gruppe, Karuten” [Austria]; don. E. SOCHUREK.
Triturus boscai see Pelonectes boscai in APPENDIX I1 and Triton Maltzani in APPEN-
DIX I1
APPENDIX I
GYMNOPHIONA
Caeciliidae
Ichthyophiidae
Holotype: ZMB 5545, adult; “Nilgherries” [Tamil Nadu, India]; don. Kapt. R. H. BED-
DOME.
Typhlonectidae
R e m a r k s : FURHRMANN (1914) mentioned this name for specimens in the ZMB and Hamburg
(ZMH) collections, but provided no catalogue numbers. It was, however, stated that the ZMB
specimen upon which the description was based was one that had been dissected in order to
remove a foetus described by PETERS(1875). ZMH 838, from Maracaibo, Venezuela, was regarded
by DUNN(1942) as a cotype, and on this basis the type locality was erroneously restricted to Maracaibo
by GORHAM (1962). The Hamburg specimen is a paratype (see TAYLOR 1968). NUSSBAUM & WILKINSON
(1989) questioned the validity of this taxon as a full species. Although the date of this publication
was correctly given by DUNN(1942), TAYLOR (1968) and subsequent authors have frequently miscited
it as 1914. The ZMB library copy of the paper, however, was received in January 1913, verifying the
1912 date.
CAUDATA
H ynobiidae
Sy nt y p e : ZMB 6875; “Kamtachatka, bei Jawina an der Mundung des Bolscheretsk auf
Lilpatka” [Russia]; coll. E. WOSNESSENSKY;exch. A. STRAUCH (ZIL).
R e m a r k s : The ZMB type files list this specimen as a type, but the specimen could not be located
in the collection. STRAUCH (1 870) mentioned that many specimens existed and provided measurements
for five of these. At least some other members of the type series are presumed to be in the ZIL
collection in St. Petersburg.
Plethodon tidae
Ho lot y p e: ZMB 32907, adult; “Sta. Isabel bei Para” [Brazil]; coll. PRAETORIUS.
20’
300 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
Salamandridae
APPENDIX I1
GYMNOPHIONA
Caeciliidae
Remarks: This name was first used in the form Caecilia Guntheri (as a nomen nudum)
by PETERS(1880), in reference to BMNH 1946.9.5.12 (formerly 1860.6.16.85). The name is
properly attributed to DUNN(1942), who validated it by providing a description and regarded
it as a substitute name for Caecilia rostrata. TAYLOR
(1968) provided a detailed nomenclatural history of
this taxon.
Ichth yophiidae
CAUDATA
Hyno biidae
Salamandridae
Acknowledgements
We thank MARVALEE H. WAKEand DAVIDB. WAKEfor comments on the manuscript, the libraries of
the California Academy of Sciences, the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, and the
University of California, Berkeley and the archives of the Department of Herpetology, American
Museum of Natural History for access to their resources, and Villanova University for supporting
travel by the senior author to work in the ZMB collections.
Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berl. 69 (1993) 2 303
Literature cited
AHL, E. (1926): Neue Eidechsen und Amphibien. - Zool. Anz. 67, 186- 192.
- (1934): Ein neuer Schleichenlurch der Gattung Dermophis von den Seychellen. - Zool. Anz. 196,
284.
BALLION, E. (1968): Ein neuer Wassermolch aus dem siidlichen Theile Westsibiriens. - Bull. SOC.
Imp. Nat. Moscou 41, 138- 143.
BARBOUR, T. & A. LOVERIDGE (1929): Typical reptiles and amphibians in the Museum of Comparative
Zoology. - Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 69, 203 - 360.
- & - (1946): First supplement to typical reptiles and amphibians. - Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 96,
57,- 2 14.
BAUER,A. & R. GUNTHER (1991): An annotated type catalogue of the geckos (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)
in the Zoological Museum, Berlin. - Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 67, 279-310.
BEDDOME, R. H. (1 870): Descriptions of new reptiles from the Madras Presidency. - Madras Monthly
J. Med. Sci. 2, 169-176.
BERTHOLD, A. A. (1859): Einige neue Reptilien des Akad. Zoolog. Museums zu Gottingen. - Nachr.
G. A. Univ. Kon. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen 1859 (l-20), 179-181.
BOCAGE, J. V. BARBOZA Du (1864a): Note sur un nouveau batracien du Portugal, Chioglossa lusitanica,
et sur une grenouille nouvelle de I’Afrique occidentale. - Rev. Mag. Zool. Pure Appliq. (Paris)
(2) 16, 248-254 + PI. 21.
- (1864b): Notice sur un batrachien nouveau du Portugal (Chioglossa lusitanica, Nob). - Proc. Zool.
SOC.London 1864,264-265 + pl. 21.
- (1873): Mdanges erpetologiques. 11. Sur quelques reptiles et batraciens nouveaux, rares ou peu
connus d’Afrique occidentale. - J. Sci. Math. Phys. Nat. Lisboa (15) 4, 209-227.
BOETTGER, 0. (1879): Amphibien aus Siidportugal. Aufzahlungder von Freih. H. v. MALTZAN-FEDEROW
Mirz und April 1879 in Alemtejo und im Konigreich Algarve gesammelten Reptilien und
Batrachier. - Z. Ges. Naturwe., Halle 52, 497 - 534.
BOULENGER, G. A. (1 880a): Sur une forme interessante de Triton provenant de Moldavie et observations
sur le genre Pelonectes Lataste. - Bull. SOC.Zool. France 1880, 37-40.
- (1880b): Description d’une espece nouvelle de Triton. - Bull. SOC.Zool. France 1880, 157- 161
+ PI. 7.
- (1882): Catalogue of the Batrachia Gradientia S. Caudata and Batrachia Apoda in the Collection
of the British Museum, 2nd ed. - London: Taylor & Francis.
- (1894): Third report on additions to the batrachian collection in the Natural History Museum. -
Proc. Zool. SOC.London 1894, 640-646 + pls. 39-40.
- (191 I): List of the batrachians and reptiles obtained by Prof. STANLEY GARDINER on his second
expedition to the Seychelles and Aldabra. - Trans. Linn. SOC.London (2) 14, 375 - 378.
BUSACK,S. D. (1976): A review of the gold-striped salamander, Chioglossa lusitanica (Amphibia:
Salamandridae). - Biol. Conserv. 10, 309 - 3 19.
COCHRAN, D. M. (1961): Type specimens of reptiles and amphibians in the U S . National Museum.
- Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 220, i-xv + 1-29].
COPE,E. D. (1865): Third contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. - Proc. Acad. Nat.
Sci. Philadelphia 17, 185- 198.
- (1874): On some Batrachia and Nematognathi brought from the Upper Amazon by Prof. ORTON.
- Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 26, 120- 137.
DAUDIN,F. M. (1803): Histoire Naturelle, Generale et Particulieredes Reptiles, Vol. 8. - Paris. : Dufart.
DUNN,E. R. (1917): Reptile and amphibian collections from the North Carolina mountains, with
especial reference to salamanders. - Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 37, 593-634.
- (1923): The salamanders of the family Hynobiidae. - Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 58.445 - 523.
- (1926): The Salamanders of the Family Plethodontidae. - Northampton, Mass.: Smith College.
- (1927): Additional notes on Hynobius. - Copeia 162, 19-20.
- (1940): New and noteworthy herpetological material from Panama. - Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
+
Philadelphia 92, 105- 122 2 pls.
- (1942): The American caecilians. - Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 91, 339-540.
DYBOWSKY, B. (1870): Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Wassermolche Siberiens. - Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges.
Wien 20, 237-241 + pi. 7.
304 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
LOUMONT, C. (1992): Les amphibiens de SHo Tome et Principe: revision systematique, cris nuptiaux
et caryotypes. - Alytes 10, 37-62.
MARX,H. (1958): Catalogue of type specimens of reptiles and amphibiens in Chicago Natural History
Museum. - Fieldiana Zool. 36, 407-496.
MERTENS, R. (1922): Verzeichnis der Typen in der herpetologischen Sammlung des Senckenbergischen
Museums. - Seckenbergiana 4, 162- 183.
- (1967): Die herpetologische Sektion des Natur-Museums und Forschungs-Institutes Senckenberg
in Frankfurt a. M. nebst einem Verzeichnis ihrer Typen. 1. - Senckenbergiana Biol. 48, Sonderh.
A, 1-106.
NIEDEN,F. (1912): Ubersicht iiber die afrikanischen Schleichenlurche (Amphibia, Apoda) mit einer
Bestimmungstabelle. - Sber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin 1912 (3), 186-214.
- (1913): Gymnophiona (Amphibia apoda). - Das Tierreich 37, x + 31 pp.
NUSSBAUM, R. A. & E. D. BRODIE, Jr. (1981): Taricha torosa (RATHKE), California newt. - Cat. Amer.
Amphib. Rept. 273.1-4.
- & M. WILKINSON (1989): On the classification and phylogeny of caecilians (Amphibia: Gym-
nophiona), a critical review. - Herpetol. Monogr. 3, 1-42.
PAPENFUSS, T. J., D. B. WAKE& K. ADLER(1984 [1983]): Salamanders of the genus Bolitoglossa from
the Sierra Madre del Sur of southern Mexico. - J. Herpetol. 17, 295-307 + pl. 1.
PARKER, H. W. (1941): The caecilians of the Seychelles. - Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (11) 7, 1 - 17.
- (1958): Caecilians of the Seychelles Islands with description of a new subspecies. - Copeia 1958,
71 -76.
PERACCA, M. G. (1898a): Descrizione di una nuova species di tritone italiano. - Boll. Mus. Zool.
Anat. Comp. Univ. Torino 13 (317), 1-6.
- (1998b): Note on an Italian newt, Molge italica. - Proc. Zool. SOC.London 1898,482 -487 + pl. 40.
PETERS, W. (1863): Fernere Mitteilungen iiber neue Batrachier. - Mber. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1863,
445 -470.
- (1873): Uber eine neue Schildkrotenart, Cinosternon Ej’eldtii und einige andere neue oder weniger
bekannte Amphibien. - Mber. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1873, 603-618 + 1 pl.
- ( I 874): Uber neue Amphibien (Gymnopis, Siphonops, Polypedates, Rhacophorus, Hyla, Cyclodus,
Euprepes, Clemmys). - Mber. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1874, 616-624 + 2 pls.
- (1875):UberderEntwickelungderCaecilien.- Mber.K.Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1875,483-486 + 1 pl.
- (1877): Uber die von Hrn. Prof. Dr. K. MOBIUS1874 auf den Maskarenen und Seychellen, sowie
iiber die von Hrn. Dr. SACHSim vorigen Jahr in Venezuela gesammelten Amphibien. - Mber. K.
Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1877, 455-460 + 1 pl.
- (1879). Uber neue Amphibien des Kgl. zoologischen Museums (Euprepes, Acontias, Typhlops,
Zamenis, Spilotes, Oedipus). - Mber. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1878, 775-779 + 1 pl.
- (1880): Uber die Eintheilung der Caecilien und insbesondere iiber die Gattungen Rhinatrema und
Gymnopis. - Mber. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1879, 924-943 + I pl.
-- (1882a): Eine neue Art der urodelen Batrachier, Oedipus yucatanus, aus Yucatan (Centralamerica).
- Sber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin 1882, 137- 138.
-- (1882b): Drei neue Batrachier (Amblystoma Krausei, Nyctibatrachus sinensis, Bufo Buchneri). -
Sber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin 1882, 145- 148.
SAUVAGE, H.-E. (1876): Sur quelques batraciens de la Chine. - L’Institut, n.s. (4) 189, 274-275.
SLEVIN,J. R. (1937): Contributions to oriental herpetology V. Honshu or Hondo, the neighboring
islands of Sado and Awaji, and the seven islands of Idzu. - Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4) 23,175 - 190.
SOCHLIREK, E. (1956): Nadere gegevens over drie onlangs beschreven Amphibien en Reptilienrassen.
- Lacerta 14 (5), 33-37.
- & H. S. GAYDA (1941a): Ueber die Lurche und Kriechtiere bei Wien mit Untersuchungen iiber
den Rassenkreis des Feuersalamanders. - Das Aquarium 15 (8), 39-40.
- & - (1941 b): Ueber die Lurche und Kriechtiere bei Wien mit Untersuchungen iiber den Rassenkreis
des Feuersalamanders. - Das Aquarium 15 (9), 43 -44.
STEJNEGER, L. (1907): Herpetology of Japan and adjacent territory. - Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 58,
i-xx + 1-577.
STRAUCH, A. (1870): Revision der Salamandriden-Gattungen nebst Beschreibung einiger neuen oder
weniger bekannten Arten dieser Familie. - Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Petersbourg 16 (7),
1 - 119 + pls. 1 - 2 + I unnumbered plate.
306 A. M. BAUERet al., Type Catalogue of the Caecilians and Salamanders
TAYLOR,E. H. (1940): New salamanders from Mexico with a discussion of certain known forms. -
Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 26 [1939], 407-439.
- (1960): On the caecilian species Zchthyophis monochrous and Zchthyophis glutinosus and related
species. - Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 40, 37- 120.
- (1961): Notes on Indian caecilians. - J. Bombay Nat. Hist. SOC.58, 355-365.
- (1965): New Asiatic and African caecilians with redescriptions of certain other species. - Univ.
Kansas Sci. Bull. 46, 253 - 302.
- (1968): Caecilians of the World: a Taxonomic Review. - Lawrence, Kansas: Univeresity of Kansas
Press.
- (1969a): Miscellaneous notes and descriptions of new forms of caecilians. - Univ. Kansas Sci.
Bull. 48, 281 -296.
- (1969b): A new caecilian from Brasil. - Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 48, 307-313.
TEMMINCK, C. J. (1836): Coup-d’oeil sur la faune des iles de la Sonde et de l’emire du Japon. Discours
prtliminaire destine a servir d’introduction a la Faune du Japon, i - xxx.
- & H. SCHLEGEL(1838): Reptilia in SIEBOLD,P. F. de. Faune Japonica. - Lugduni Batavorum
Amstelodami: Apud J. Muller et Co.
THIREAU,M. (1986): Catalogue des Types d’urodtles du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle,
Revue Critique. - Paris: Laboratoire de Zoologie (Reptiles et Amphibiens), Museum National
d’Histoire Naturelle. 96 pp.
THORN,R (1969 [1968]): Les Salamandres d’Europe, d’Asie et d’Afrique du Nord. - Pans: Editions
Paul Lechavalier.
TORNIER, G . (1897): Die Kriechtiere Deutsch-Ost-Afrikas. Beitrage zur Systematik und Descendenz-
lehre. - Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
TOURNEVILLE, A. (1876) : Description d’une nouvelle urodde d’Espagne (Pelonectes Boscai Lataste).
- Bull. SOC.Zool. France 4, 5-23 + pl. 7.
UNTERSTEIN, W. (1930a): Beitrage zur Lurch- und Kriechtierfauna Kwangsi’s. 11. Schwanzlurche. -
Sber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin 1929, 3 13 - 315.
- (1930b): Beschreibung zweier neuer Molche der Gattung Oedipus. - Zool. Anz. 87, 270-272.
WAKE,D. B. (1993): Phylogenetic and taxonomic issues relating to salamanders of the Family
Plethodontidae. Herpetologica 49, in press.
WAKE,M. (1988): Gymnopis, G. multiplicata. - Cat. Amer. Amphib. Rept. 411.1-2.
WELLBORN, V. (1936): Beschreibung eines neuen Molches der Gattung Cryptobranchus. - Zool. Anz.
114, 63 -64.
ZHAO.E. & W. HU (1984): Studies on Chinese Tailed Amphibians [in Chinese]. - Chengdu: Sichuan
Scientific and Technical Publishing House.
- & - (1988): Studies on Chinese tailed amphibians. pp. 1-44 in ZHAO,E., Hu, Q., JIANG,
Y.& Y.YANG.Studies on Chinese Salamanders. - Oxford, Ohio: Society for the Study of
Amphibians and Reptiles.