MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III (Proficient Teachers)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF RIZAL Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2019-2020

Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of Quality

Education Knowledge and content within and across 1.Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
knowledge of content within and across
22.5%
curriculum teaching areas.

2.Lesson plans/ modified DLLs developed

highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas.

3.Instructional materials highlighting mastery of

content and its integration in other subject areas. Efficiency

4. Performance tasks/ test materials highlighting

integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas.

5. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education teaching strategies that and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
Services enhance learner teaching strategies that enhance learner
achievement in literacy achievement in literacy and numeracy skills.
and numeracy skills. Efficiency
2. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or numeracy skills.

3. Instructional materials highlighting that Timeliness

promote literacy and/or numeracy skills.
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

4. Performance tasks/ test used in teaching.

5. Results of assessment used in teaching.

6. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 3. Applied range of Quality
Education teaching strategies to 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services develop critical and and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
creative thinking as well teaching strategies to develop critical and
as other high order creative thinking as well as other high order
thinking skills. thinking skills.

2. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs developed

highlighting different teaching strategies that
Efficiency
develop critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS.

3. Instructional materials highlighting different

teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or other HOTS.

4. Performance tasks/ test materials used in Timeliness

demonstration teaching.

5. Results of assessment used in teaching.

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom 22.5% Quality
Education Environment structure to engage 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
Services and Diversity of learners, individually or in sheet and/ or inter-observer agreement form
Learners groups, in meaningful about managing classroom structure that
exploration, discovery and engages learners in various activities.
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

hands-on activities within 2. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs developed Efficiency

a range of physical highlighting various classroom management
learning environments. strategies that engage learners in activities/tasks
in different physical learning environments.

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality
Education behavior constructively by Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services applying positive and non- and/or inter-observer agreement form about
violent discipline to effective teacher management of learner
ensure learning focused behavior using the following strategies:
environments. 1. Providing motivation
2. Praising the learners/Giving positive
feedback
3. Setting house rules/guidelines Efficiency
4. Ensuring learners’ active participation
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated Quality
Education developmentally 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services appropriate learning and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
experiences to address using differentiated, developmentally appropriate
learners’ gender, needs, learning experiences.
strengths, interests and
experiences.
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Efficiency
2. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs developed
highlighting differentiation in content, product,
and process, learning environment or others
according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences.

3. Instructional materials highlighting Timeliness

differentiation in content, product, and process,
learning environment or others according to
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and
experiences.

4. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed and 22.5% Quality
Education and Planning implemented 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services developmentally and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
sequenced teaching and using developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning processes to learning processes.
meet curriculum
2. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs highlighting
requirements and varied
developmentally sequenced instruction that meet
teaching contexts Efficiency
curriculum goals and varied teaching contexts.

3. Instructional materials used to implement

developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet curriculum and varied
teaching contexts.

4. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
Timeliness
8. Participated in collegial Quality
discussions that use 1. Personal notes of teachers on
teacher and learner LACs/FGDs/meeting with proof of attendance.
feedback to enrich
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

teaching practice. 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of Efficiency

teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice with proof of attendance

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations) Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, Quality
Education organized and used 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
Services appropriate teaching and sheet and/ or inter-observer agreement form
learning resources, about using appropriate teaching and learning
including ICT, to address resources including ICT.
learning goals. 1. Activity Sheets/tasks and worksheets Efficiency
2. Power point presentations
3. Video Clips
4. Module
5. SIMs-Strategis=c Intervention Materials
6. Others
Timeliness
2. Lessons plans/ modified DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials appended.

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, Quality

Education and Reporting organized and used 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
Services diagnostic, formative and and/ or inter-observer agreement form about
summative strategies using diagnostic, formative and summative
consistent with curriculum strategies consistent with curriculum
requirements. requirements. Efficiency

2. Prepared Lesson plans/ modified DLLs

highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies.
Timeliness
3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets.

4. Developed summative tests;(a) with TOS

reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets.

5. Developed Performance tasks;(a) with rubrics

reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics.

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

Basic 11. Monitored and 22.5% Quality

Education evaluated learner 1. Compilation of learners’ written work with
Services progress and summary of results and with signature of parents.
achievement using
learner attainment data. 2. Formative/ summative assessment tools with
TOS and frequency of errors with identified least Efficiency
mastered skills.

3. Class records/ grading sheets

4. Lesson plans/ modified DLLs showing index of

mastery. Timeliness
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 12.Communicated Quality
Education promptly and clearly the 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of
Services learners’ needs, progress the same 3 learners in the same learning area
and achievement to key with parents/guardians with date of receipt.
 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

stakeholders, including Efficiency

parents/guardians. 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or parent-Teacher
Conference all quarters with proof of
parents/guardians attendance.

3. Report cards with parent’s signatures in all

quarters supported by minutes of meeting.

4. Dev Anecdotal record showing entries per

quarter.

5. Other documents showing learners’ needs,

progress and achievement submitted to other
stakeholders.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 10% Quality
Education related works/ activities 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation
Services that contribute to the
teaching-learning 2. Certificate of Training
process.
3. Certificate of Speakership

4. Committee involvement

5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

 Mid-year Review
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (MT)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

6. Book of Journal Authorship/Co-authorship/ Efficiency

Contributorship

7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship

8. Coaching and mentoring learners in

competitions

9. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority