Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
your name,
student id,
word count
Table of content with clear sections/sub sections labelled
List of figures
Executive summary
Institute of the public administration signed its project for construction in 2016 aims
at construction of rooms and building by third quarter of 2020. The project includes the
evaluated in this study with key stakeholders classified as external and internal
stakeholders. The study highlights the recommendations for company and project in last
section followed by the conclusion. The recommendations state that company must focus
on time compliance and budget management to cut extra cost charged to ASAAS in this
project.
Introduction
Institute of the public administration is a project under Asaas located and operating in
Oman. The site of project is 28000 sq. m and it linked closely to the ministries area of
Muscat, Al Khuwair. The Muscat national development and Investment Company aimed at
construction of the 280 room hotel and the business area along with the IPA’s new
headquarters. Minister of civil services signed the agreement with chairman of IPA for the
institute. It was planned that the Steigenberger Hotels will manage the hotel and branded as
the InterCityHotel. It is perceived as second hotel that will be opened in the Salalah. The
project passed through various phases of construction and arrived at the 90% completion of
the project. This study will include the 5 key project management knowledge areas
Risk
Risk of Project
Risk of the project states three stages of risks to be coped by the organization. The
first level of the risks to be coped by the ASAAS in this project includes relative level of the
risk important for this project. Risk is mainly the uncertainty and the changes in situation as
compared to the effective level of the performance as well as the activity desired. In the
second stage, the level of risk includes the economic and financial risks, the external and site
Temporal scenario
In the past, the time started the operations and organization was based upon the
temporary cases of the situation. The major issues were pertained to the hiring of right
person for planning and the equipment management. Resources required for the project
were also not specifically mentioned so the project team needed a person who could be
able to manage the resources and their needs of communication to entire team. This also
demonstrated the need of further development of the rewards and their communication.
The current challenges are based upon the 80% completion of the project. At this stage, the
timeline management is the key issue and major risk for ASAAS. The company identifies that
the rate of return will be higher if the changes made at this level will not call for the extra
changes in entire program. The deadline of the program is fix and near so the most
important and contingent risk for the future time is deadline of project.
Achievement of project excellence
Project excellence is possible through the risk minimization and risk mitigation. Risk
factors must be devised in the three key classes including the time issues, the quality related
issues and the cost problems. The risk factors pertained to the quality for the construction
communication for all parties and the supplies of the effective materials. The time
overrunning can be managed through the cost effectiveness, the quality laws implications,
construction management and the effective communication. Payment must also not be
delayed to control the future issues. The cost can be managed through the suitable
leadership styles and changes of the materials prizes. ASAAS will be able to manage the risks
Scope
Scope of Project
The scope of project includes the persons who are involved in this project and the
Temporal scenario
The past scope of the project encompassing the planning and designing, bidding and
the construction. Currently, the project is passing through the end of the construction
phase. In the first three phases, process encompassed the programming and planning of
schematic form. Contracts management were based upon the finishing pf plans, electrical
plans, structural plans, working drawings and mechanical plans. The bidding of the project
including the elevation, flooring and the finishing of the roofing as well as rough
construction. The companies are also involved for the scope management and the
construction process excellence. The process of the flooring was including the material that
is cost effective and can continue for the standardized changes in the system. The tools and
their long run planning was also communicated to key stakeholders for their needs in the
long run. The challenges for the elevation was also managed through the expertise hiring.
The process of the windows and doors were hampered due to the lack of right walls, the
right shape of windows and their designing availability. The company also hired the
designing and architectural person for the completion of process. The future objectives of
this project included the finishing of windows and the doors and their communication in the
strategic way to reduce the cost as much as possible. The last one is the payment of the
future.
The excellence in the scope phase is manageable through various laws and
regulations. First of all, as per the stakeholder theory, there must be no compromise over
stakeholder managemt and their right’s communication to them. The company must
maximize the stakeholder wealth to ensure their participation in the company projects. The
second one is the expertise hiring and ensuring that there must be the higher rate of the
changes in system available to tackle problems. The completion phase will record the lack of
compliance with budget, the time elapses as well as learning from project. This process will
also be communicated to the next stages of problem management so these issues must not
Recommendations
Conclusion
Summing it up, there are various issues and their communication for projects. IPA is
one of the key projects in construction industry of Oman. The prject was started in 2016 and
will end by 2020. The third quarter of 2020 is fixed as the ending time. 100% feasibility study
is complete for this project whereas the project’s status for completion includes the changes
in the long run for communication, stakeholder management, risk management, Resources
as well as scope of project. The major issues are found in the management of scope of