Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
This part of the book introduces the idea of the operations function in different
types of organization. It identifies the common set of objectives to which
operations managers aspire in order to serve their customers, and it explains
how operations can have an important strategic role.
Direct
4UFFSJOHPQFSBUJPOs
BOEQSocesses
Transformed
resources
t.BUFSJBMT
t*OGPSNBUJPO
t$VTUPNFST Design Develop
4IBQJOHQSocesses, Operations *NQSPWJOHUIF
QSPEVDUTBOE management PQFSBUJPn’T
TFSWJDFT DBQBCJMJUJFs 0VUQVU
*OQVU VaMVFBEEFd
resources QSPEVDUTBOE
GPSDVTUPNFST
TFSWJDFT
Deliver
1MBOOJOHBOE
cPOUSPMMJOHPOHPJOH
TrBOTGPSNJOH PQFSBUJPOT
resources
t'BDJMJUJFT
t4UBGG
1 Operations management
Topic covered in
this chapter
Operations
management
Operations
Design Develop
management
Deliver
(All chapters start with an ‘Operations in practice’ example that illustrates some of the issues that will be covered in the chapter.)
Core functional Internet service Fast food chain International aid Furniture manufacturer
activities provider (ISP) charity
Operations Maintain hardware, Make burgers, etc. Give service to the Make components
software and content Serve customers beneficiaries of the Assemble furniture
Implement new links Maintain equipment charity
and services
Product/service Devise new services Design hamburgers, Develop new appeals Design new furniture
development and commission new pizzas, etc. campaigns Co-ordinate with
information content Design decor for Design new assistance fashionable colours
restaurants programmes
Start with the statement from the ‘easy to visualize’ automobile plant. Its summary of what
operations management does is . . . ‘Operations management uses machines to efficiently assem-
ble products that satisfy current customer demands.’ The statements from the other organiza-
tions were similar, but used slightly different language. Operations management used not just
machines but also . . . ‘knowledge, people, our and our partners’ resources’, and ‘our staff’s experi-
ence and knowledge’, to ‘efficiently (or effectively, or creatively) assemble (or produce, change, sell,
move, cure, shape, etc.) products (or services or ideas) that satisfy (or match or exceed or delight)
customer (or client or citizens’ or society) demands (or needs or concerns or even dreams)’. So
whatever terminology is used there is a common theme and a common purpose to how we can
Figure 1.3 Operations management uses resources to appropriately create outputs that fulfil defined market
requirements
Source: Shutterstock.com/Toria
is a whole industry devoted to designing
websites so that they have the right type
of impact. In fact, taken over the years,
web development has been one of the
fastest-growing industries in the world. But
it’s also a tough industry. Not every web
design company thrives, or even survives
beyond a couple of years. To succeed, web designers need dealer, you can safely assume that we’re not going to be
technology skills, design capabilities, business awareness interested.’
and operational professionalism. Nevertheless, straightforward operational effectiveness
One company that has succeeded is Torchbox, an is also essential to Torchbox’s business. ‘We know how to
independently owned web design and development make sure that our projects run not only on time and to
company based in Oxfordshire. Founded back in 2000, budget’, says Olly Willans, also a co-founder and the firm’s
it now employs 30 people, providing ‘high-quality, cost- Creative Director, ‘but we also like to think that we provide
effective, and ethical solutions for clients who come primar- an enjoyable and stimulating experience – both for our
ily, but not exclusively, from the charity, non-governmental customers’ development teams and for our staff too. High
organizations and public sectors’. standards of product and service are important to us: our
Co-founder and Technical Director Tom Dyson has clients want accessibility, usability, performance and security
been responsible for the technical direction of all major embedded in their web designs, and of course, they want
developments. ‘There are a number of advantages about things delivered on-time and on-budget. We are in a cre-
being a relatively small operation’, he says. ‘We can be ative industry that depends on fast-moving technologies,
hugely flexible and agile, in what is still a dynamic mar- but that doesn’t mean that we can’t also be efficient. We
ket. But at the same time we have the resources and skills back everything we do with a robust feature-driven develop-
to provide a creative and professional service. Any sen- ment process using a kanban project management method-
ior manager in a firm of our size cannot afford to be too ology which helps us manage our obligations to our clients.’
specialized. All of us here have our own specific responsi- The ‘kanban’ approach used by the Torchbox web
bilities; however, every one of us shares the overall respon- development teams originated from car manufacturers
sibility for the firm’s general development. We can also be like Toyota (it is fully explained in Chapter 15). ‘Using sound
clear and focused on what type of work we want to do. Our operations management techniques helps us constantly to
ethos is important to us. We set out to work with clients deliver value to our clients’, says Tom Dyson. ‘We like to think
who share our commitment to environmental sustainabil- that our measured and controlled approach to handling and
ity and responsible, ethical business practice; we take our controlling work helps ensure that every hour we work pro-
work, and that of our clients, seriously. If you’re an arms duces an hour’s worth of value for our clients and for us.’
operations staff in a children’s welfare department who have to face the conflict between
the cost of providing extra social workers and the risk of a child not receiving adequate
protection. Nevertheless the vast majority of the topics covered in this book have relevance
to all types of organization, including non-profit, even if the context is different and some
terms may have to be adapted.
Table 1.2 Changes in the business environment are shaping a new operations agenda
of information about its customers’ financial affairs. As customers, we may be unhappy with
badly printed statements and we may be unhappy if we are not treated appropriately in
the bank. But if the bank makes errors in our financial transactions, we suffer in a far more
fundamental way. Table 1.3 gives examples of operations with their dominant transformed
resources.
The other set of inputs to any operations process are transforming resources. These are
the resources which act upon the transformed resources. There are two types which form the
‘building blocks’ of all operations:
● facilities – the buildings, equipment, plant and process technology of the operation;
● staff – the people who operate, maintain, plan and manage the operation. (Note we use
the term ‘staff’ to describe all the people in the operation, at any level.)
The exact nature of both facilities and staff will differ between operations. To a five-star hotel,
its facilities consist mainly of ‘low-tech’ buildings, furniture and fittings. To a nuclear-pow-
ered aircraft carrier, its facilities are ‘high-tech’ nuclear generators, and sophisticated elec-
tronic equipment. Staff will also differ between operations. Most staff employed in a factory
assembling domestic refrigerators may not need a very high level
✽ Operations principle of technical skill. In contrast, most staff employed by an accounting
All processes have transforming company are, hopefully, highly skilled in their own particular ‘tech-
resources of facilities (equipment, nical’ skill (accounting). Yet although skills vary, all staff can make
technology, etc.) and people. a contribution. An assembly worker who consistently misassembles
refrigerators will dissatisfy customers and increase costs just as surely
as an accountant who cannot add up. The balance between facilities and staff also varies.
A computer chip manufacturing company, such as Intel, will have significant investment in
physical facilities. A single chip fabrication plant can cost in excess of $4 billion, so operations
managers will spend a lot of their time managing their facilities. Conversely, a management
consultancy firm depends largely on the quality of its staff. Here operations management is
largely concerned with the development and deployment of consultant skills and knowledge.
Aluminium smelting
Figure 1.5 The output from most operations is a mixture of products and services. Some
general examples are shown here together with some of the operations featured as examples
in this chapter
oil wells. So are aluminium smelters, but they might also deliver some services such as technical
advice. Services in these circumstances are called facilitating services. To an even greater extent,
machine tool manufacturers deliver facilitating services such as technical advice and applica-
tions engineering. The services delivered by a restaurant are an essential part of what the cus-
tomer is paying for. It is both a manufacturing operation which creates and delivers meals and a
provider of service in the advice, ambience and service of the food. An information systems pro-
vider may create software ‘products’, but primarily it is providing a service to its customers, with
facilitating products. Certainly, a management consultancy, although it produces reports and
documents, would see itself primarily as a service provider. Finally, pure services solely create
and deliver services – a psychotherapy clinic, for example. Of the short cases and examples in this
chapter, IKEA and Pret A Manger both create and deliver products and services, but IKEA’s cus-
tomers are probably more interested in the ‘products’ they collect from the store than any idea of
‘service’. Torchbox produces intangible ‘products’ and web design advice
‘services’ in close collaboration with its clients, as does MSF. Formule 1 ✽ Operations principle
and the resort hotel are close to being pure services, although they both Most operations produce a mixture
have some tangible elements such as food. of tangible products and intangible
Increasingly the distinction between services and products is dif- services.
ficult to define and not particularly useful. Software is both a product
(sold on a disc) and a service when sold over the internet or used by
the customer. A restaurant meal is both a product and also a service as
✽ Operations principle
it is delivered and consumed. Indeed we would argue that all opera-
Whether an operation produces tangible
tions are service providers which may create and deliver products as
products or intangible services is
part of the offering to their customers. This is why operations manage-
becoming increasingly irrelevant. In a
ment is important to all organizations. Whether they see themselves sense all operations produce service for
as manufacturers or service providers is very much a secondary issue. their customers.
Customers
Customers may be an input to many operations (see earlier) but they are also the reason for
their existence. If there were no customers (whether business customers, users or consum-
ers), there would be no operation. So it is critical that operations managers are aware of
customer needs, both current and potential. This information will determine what the opera-
tion has to do and how it has to do it (the operation’s strategic performance objectives), which
in turn defines the service/product offering to be designed, created and delivered.
Operation Some of the operation’s Some of the operation’s Some of the operation’s
inputs processes outputs
Department store Products for sale Source and store products Customers and products
Sales staff Display products ‘assembled’ together.
Information systems Give sales advice
Customers Sell products
Figure 1.6 Operations and process management requires analysis at three levels: the supply network, the
operation, and the process
The idea of the internal network of processes is seen by some as being over-simplistic.
In reality the relationship between groups and individuals is significantly more complex
than that between commercial entities. One cannot treat internal customers and
suppliers exactly as we do external customers and suppliers. External customers and
suppliers usually operate in a free market. If an organization believes that in the long
run it can get a better deal by purchasing services and products from another supplier,
it will do so. But internal customers and suppliers are not in a ‘free market’. They
cannot usually look outside either to purchase input resources or to sell their output
services and products (although some organizations are moving this way). Rather than
take the ‘economic’ perspective of external commercial relationships, models from
organizational behaviour, it is argued, are more appropriate.
Business processes
Whenever a business attempts to satisfy its customers’ needs it will use many processes, both
in its operations and its other functions. Each of these processes will contribute some part
to fulfilling customer needs. For example, the television programme
and video production company, described previously, creates and ✽ Operations principle
delivers two types of ‘product’. Both of these involve a slightly dif- Processes are defined by how the
ferent mix of processes within the company. The company decides organization chooses to draw process
to reorganize its operations so that each product is created from boundaries.
start to finish by a dedicated process that contains all the elements
Organizational function Some of its processes Outputs from its process Customer(s) for its outputs
Information technology Systems review process System evaluation All other processes
Help desk process Advice All other processes
System implementation Implemented working All other processes
project processes systems and aftercare
necessary for its production, as in Figure 1.7. So customer needs for each product are
entirely fulfilled from within what is called an ‘end-to-end’ business process. These often
cut across conventional organizational boundaries. Reorganizing (or ‘re-engineering’) pro-
cess boundaries and organizational responsibilities around these business processes is the
philosophy behind business process re-engineering (BPR) which is discussed further later
(see Chapter 18).
Figure 1.7 The television and video company divided into two ‘end-to-end’ business processes,
one dedicated to creating programmes and the other dedicated to creating music videos
Figure 1.9 illustrates the different positions on the dimensions of the Formule 1 hotel chain
and the Anantara Bangkok Riverside Resort & Spa (see the short case on ‘Two very different
hotels’, p. 24). Both provide the same basic service as any other hotel. However, one is a luxu-
rious and intimate hotel whose customers tend to stay for relatively long periods. Its variety
of services is almost infinite in the sense that customers can make individual requests in terms
of food and entertainment. Variation is high with many customers avoiding the rainy season.
Customer contact, and therefore visibility, is also very high (in order to ascertain customers’
requirements and provide for them). All of which is very different from the Formule 1 branded
hotels, whose customers usually stay one night, where the variety of services is strictly limited,
and business and holiday customers use the hotel at different times, which limits variation.
Most notably, though, customer contact is kept to a minimum. The Anantara resort hotel
has very high levels of service but provides them at a high cost (and therefore a high price).
Conversely, Formule 1 has arranged its operation in such a way as to provide a highly stand-
ardized service at minimal cost.
Figure 1.9 The four Vs profiles of two very different hotel operations
Direct
4UFFSJOHPQFSBUJPOs
BOEQSocesses
Transformed
resources
t.BUFSJBMT
t*OGPSNBUJPO
t$VTUPNFST Design Develop
4IBQJOHQSocesses, Operations *NQSPWJOHUIF
QSPEVDUTBOE management PQFSBUJPn’T
TFSWJDFT DBQBCJMJUJFs 0VUQVU
*OQVU VaMVFBEEFd
resources QSPEVDUTBOE
GPSDVTUPNFST
TFSWJDFT
Deliver
1MBOOJOHBOE
cPOUSPMMJOHPOHPJOH
TrBOTGPSNJOH PQFSBUJPOT
resources
t'BDJMJUJFT
t4UBGG
Source: Shutterstock.com/Markus
value for customers. This means fully
understanding what ‘value’ means for
customers. It means putting yourself
in the customer’s place: knowing what
it is like to be the customer, and know-
ing how to ensure that your services
or products make the customer’s life
better.
● Communicates and motivates – operations management is about directing resources to produce services or prod-
ucts in an efficient and effective manner. This means articulating what is required and persuading people to do it.
Interpersonal skills are vital. Operations managers must be ‘people people’.
● Learns all the time – every time an operations manager initiates an action (of any kind) there is an opportunity to
learn from the result. Operations management is about learning, because without learning there can be no improve-
ment, and improvement is an imperative for all operations.
● Committed to innovation – operations management is always seeking to do things better. This means creating new
ways of doing things, being creative, imaginative, and (sometimes) unconventional.
● Knows their contribution – operations management may be the central function in any organization, but it is not the
only one. It is important that operations managers know how they can contribute to the effective working of other
functions.
● Capable of analysis – operations management is about making decisions. Each decision needs to be evaluated
(sometimes with very little time). This involves looking at both the quantitative and the qualitative aspects of the
decision. Operations managers do not necessarily have to be mathematical geniuses, but they should not be afraid
of numbers!
● Keeps cool under pressure – operations managers often work in pressured situations. They need to be able to
remain calm no matter what problems occur.
Critical commentary
The central idea in this introductory chapter is that all organizations have operations
processes which create and deliver services and products and all these processes are
essentially similar. However, some believe that by trying to characterize processes
in this way (perhaps by calling them ‘processes’) one loses or distorts their nature,
depersonalizes or takes the ‘humanity’ out of the way in which we think of the
organization. This point is often raised in not-for-profit organizations, especially by
‘professional’ staff. For example, the head of one European ‘Medical Association’ (a
doctors’ trade union) criticized hospital authorities for expecting a ‘sausage factory
service based on productivity targets’. No matter how similar they appear on paper,
it is argued, a hospital can never be viewed in the same way as a factory. Even in
commercial businesses, professionals, such as creative staff, often express discomfort
at their expertise being described as a ‘process’.