Houston ISD 2011 Magnet School Audit Magnet Demographics Charts

2010-2011 HISD Project
Elementary Magnet Schools
SWP- School Wide Program

SWAS- School Within A School
SUS- Separate and Unique School
SWVP- School Wide Vanguard Program
DWVP- District Wide Vanguard Program
Current Proposed
District
Program Current Program Program Proposed Program Recommendation Recommendation Rationale
Area
Type Type
Elementary
Remove Magnet designation and

Vanguard SW is not considered a
6 Askew Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
Magnet program by definition.
status and transportation
Does not meet Magnet program

Neighborhood Remove Magnet designation due
9 Bell Elementary School SWP Physical Development Non- Magnet requirements, school capacity is
School to capacity issues
at issue.
Diversity is 99/1% and needs to

Improve diversity in student
2 Berry Elementary School SWP Environmental Science same same be improved by 2% (-+) over the
enrollment
next 3 years.
Diversity is 99/1% and needs to
2 Bruce Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same be improved by 2% (-+) over the
enrollment
next 3 years.

Neighborhood associated Magnet funding due to Does not meet Magnet program
1 Burbank Elementary School SWAS Physical Development Non- Magnet
School limited building capacity to meet requirements.
criteria
Significantly revise Magnet Diversity is 99/1% and needs to

program to a School Wide be improved by 2% (-+) over the
2 Burrus Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same
Program; Improve diversity in next 3 years. Moving to a SWP
student enrollment should make this possible.
01/07/2011
HISD Confidential Page 1
*** School receives an additional Unique PUA funding.

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

8 Carrillo Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
Significantly revise Magnet

program to a School Wide
Program; Improve diversity in Diversity is 100% minority. By
student enrollment; remove the revising to a SWP with a new
Fine Arts Suzuki
9 Codwell Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP portable buildings and improve theme and improved facility,
Violin
the grounds of the school; diversity should improve by 2%
consider a revision to a K-8 Suzuki each year over the next 3 years.
Violin program phased in for all
students
Significantly revise Magnet Diversity is 99/1%. By revising to

program to a School Wide a SWP STEM, diversity should
3 Cornelius Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP STEM
Program; Improve diversity in improve by 2% each year over
student enrollment the next 3 years.
School exceeds capacity and

diversity is 99/1%. Diversity
3 Crespo Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same recruitment goal should be 2%
enrollment
each year over the next 3 years
for a Fine Arts magnet.

3 DeZavala Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
MSAP Grant
8 Dodson Elementary School SWP Montessori MSAP Grant MSAP Grant funded See MSAP diversity goal.
Montessori K-8
Plans are in place to change to IB IB/PYP will provide an improved

1 Durham Elementary School SWP Leadership same IB
program program of rigor and relevance.

5 Elrod Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet
criteria

2 Felix Cook Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet
criteria
SWP affords all students to

participate in the Fine Arts
Significantly revise Magnet program. School exceeds
Garden Villas Elementary program to a School Wide capacity and diversity is 97/3%.
3 SWAS Fine Arts SWP same
School Program; Improve diversity in Diversity goal should be 2% each
student enrollment. year over the next 3 years. As a
SW Fine Arts program, this goal
should be achievable.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
Given the proximity of the school

location, the proposed theme
should be more attractive to
improving diversity, student
Gregory-Lincoln Elementary Museum Magnet Consider modifying the Magnet
8 SWP Fine Arts same performance, and interest in
School (K-8) School theme to a Museum School
theme-based professional
development. Diversity goal of
2% each year over 3 years
should be established.
Change theme to STEM to Adding Engineering to the

incorporate engineering. Improve Science, Technology, and Math
diversity in student enrollment. Program is more in line with the
1 Harvard Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM/IB The school is pursuing IB/PYP and top magnet themes. The
plans to be accredited by April diversity should reflect more of
2011. This will support the STEM the district-wide average for
instructional theme. elementary schools.

participate in the Dual Language
Significantly revise Magnet program. School exceeds
program to a School Wide capacity and diversity is 91/9%.
1 Helms Elementary School SWAS Dual Language SWP same
Program; Improve diversity in Diversity goal should be 2% each
student enrollment. year over the next 3 years. As a
Dual Language program, this
goal should be achievable.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

5 Herod Elementary School SWAS Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard

Neighborhood Remove Magnet designation due
1 Herrera Elementary School SWP Integrated Technology Non- Magnet requirements, school capacity is
School to capacity issues
at issue.
As a SWP, one articulated theme

throughout the grade levels is
consistent with dedicated
magnet schools. As the
program to no more than one
Narrow and define program develops, recruitment
theme for 2011-2012 or remove
5 Horn Elementary School SWP Academy same one theme or must be geared toward
the Magnet designation. A new
become Non-magnet improving the
definition of the "Academy" needs
number/percentage of minority
to be developed.
students in the program through
increased enrollment-- current
43%/57% respectively.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

A significant revision will
enhance this program and
Program; Remove entrance
capitalize on the current
exam/testing; Improve diversity in
5 Kolter Elementary School SWAS Foreign Languages SWP same instructional model for Foreign
student enrollment toward a goal
Languages. The school exceeds
of by recruiting more students of
capacity, and enrollment should
color (currently 60%/40%
be monitored.
respectively.
Marketing the program as a SWP

Significantly revise Magnet with a revised curriculum should
program to a School Wide increase enrollment over the
8 Lantrip Elementary School SWAS Environmental Science SWP same Program; increase the student next three years to meet the
population by 10% for the non- 10% recommendation and
zoned students. improve diversity by 2% each
year.
Remove Magnet designation and Does not meet Magnet program

Neighborhood associated Magnet funding due to requirements. There is no
9 Law Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet
School no opportunity for growth of non opportunity for growth of non-
zoned students zoned students.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
Adding Engineering to the

Science, Technology, and Math
Program is more in line with the
top Magnet themes. The
4 Lockhart Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM diversity should reflect more of
enrollment
the district-wide average for
elementary schools through a 2%
(-/+) each year over the next
three years,
Develop a on-going program for The Arts curriculum requires

Professional Development. professional development on an
5 Longfellow Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same same Monitor diversity in student on-going basis for teachers to
enrollment to maintain the acquire the latest skills and
district-wide average. techniques in the Fine Arts.

Consider revising instructional participate in the Literature
theme to Literature. The school program. School has available
currently is Literature based and capacity and diversity is 70/30%.
5 Lovett Elementary School SWP Fine Arts same Literature
this instructional theme could Diversity goal should be 2% (+/-)
draw more students since Fine each year over the next 3 years.
Arts is abundant. As a SW Literature program, this
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
Remove Magnet designation-

Neighborhood consider repurposing this school Does not meet Magnet program
4 MacGregor Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet
School given its proximity to downtown requirements.
and size of the school.

2 Oak Forest Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard

program. School slightly exceeds
capacity and diversity is
9 Parker Elementary School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same 78%/22% respectively. Diversity
Program; Improve diversity in
goal should be 2% (+-) each year
student enrollment
over the next 3 years. As a SW
Fine Arts program, this goal
should be achievable.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
A Literature-based program
affords all students to participate
in an array of integrated
Literature is recommended as the curriculum instruction and
main theme to encompass not resources. Fine Arts is a prime
only the arts, but other disciplines. example. School has available
3 Patterson Elementary School SWP Literature/Fine Arts same Literature
Increase non zoned Magnet capacity but diversity of 97/3%
population by 10%; Improve should be improved by 2% (-/+)
diversity in student enrollment each year over the next 3 years.
As a SWP with a revised
emphasis, this goal should be
achievable.

Pleasantville Elementary Vanguard SW is not considered a
2 SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
School Magnet program by definition.

program. School has available
Improve diversity in student capacity and diversity is 66/34%.
5 Poe Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Same Same
enrollment. Diversity goal should be 2% (+/-)
each year over the next 3 years.
As a SW Fine Arts program, this
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

Improve diversity in student top Magnet themes. The
8 Pugh Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM enrollment. Monitor building diversity should reflect more of
capacity. the district-wide average for
three years,

Monitor diversity in student top magnet themes. The
4 Red Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same STEM enrollment to avoid exceeding the diversity of 91%/9% reflects
district-wide average. almost the district-wide average
for schools. A goal would be to
improve by 2% (-/+) each year
over the next three years.
Rename SUS (district wide);

Dedicated Name "District-wide" is the
5 Rice Elementary (K-8) SUS Technology same Improve diversity in student
Magnet acceptable terminology for SUS
enrollment

7 River Oaks Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

5 Roberts Elementary School SWP Fine Arts Non- Magnet
criteria

1 Roosevelt Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard

Significantly revise Magnet Program is more in line with the
program to a School Wide top Magnet themes. The
2 Ross Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP STEM Program; Increase non zoned diversity should reflect more of
student population; Improve the district-wide average for
diversity. elementary schools through a 2%
three years,
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

top Magnet themes. IB/ PYP
program to a School Wide STEM
offers another vehicle for this
Program and/or, consider
STEM/ IB school to advance the academic
8 Rusk Elementary School (K-8) SWAS Math/Sci/Tech SWP changing theme to IB/PYP.
(PYP and MYP) curriculum for all students. The
diversity should reflect more of
enrollment with is currently 99%
the district-wide average for
minority.
three years.
Currently does not meet magnet

program requirements due to
Neighborhood associated Magnet funding due to
8 Scroggins Elementary School SWAS Literature/Fine Arts Non- Magnet capacity. District may consider
School limited building capacity to meet
revising to one instructional
criteria
theme and set recruitment goals.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary
A significant revision will

enhance this program and
Significantly revise Magnet capitalize on the current
7 Sinclair Elementary School SWP Communications/Tech same Language Immersion
program to a Language Immersion instructional model for language.
The school exceeds capacity, and
enrollment should be monitored.

T. H. Rogers Elementary Dedicated Vanguard SW is not considered a
7 SUS Vanguard Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
School (K-8) DWVP Magnet program by definition.

1 Travis Elementary School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard

Neighborhood Magnet funding; retain IB/PYP
5 Twain Elementary School SWP Literature/Fine Arts Non- Magnet requirements due to capacity and
School program as a neighborhood
enrollment.
choice.
Non-existent Magnet program.

Remove Magnet designation and Students should not be charged a
Valley West Elementary Neighborhood Magnet funding due to non- fee to be in the Magnet program.
6 SWAS Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet
School School operational program during the New construction at this school
school day. will relieve overcrowding at
neighboring school.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

7 Wainwright Elementary School SWAS Math/Sci/Tech Non- Magnet
criteria
As a SWP, an articulated Pre-

engineering strand would better
Designate as a Pre engineering serve the community. As the
Magnet and a feeder school to program develops, recruitment
2 Wesley Elementary School SWP Math/Sci/Tech same Pre-engineering
Williams; Improve diversity in must be geared toward
student enrollment improving the current diversity of
99/1% (-/+) by 2% each year

West University Elementary Neighborhood Remove Magnet designation and
5 SWP Math/Sci/Tech School
Non- Magnet requirements due to capacity and
School Magnet funding
enrollment.
4 Whidby Elementary School SWP Health Science MSAP MSAP MSAP funded See MSAP diversity goal.
School exceeds capacity and

Retain current program; do not diversity is at 92/8%. As Dual
William Wharton K-8 Dual add additional instructional Language is a popular program, a
8 SWP Dual Language Same Dual Language
Language Academy themes; Improve diversity in goal of 2% (-/+) should be set for
student enrollment a more balanced student
population.
01/07/2011

Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
Elementary

Windsor Village Elementary Vanguard SW is not considered a
9 SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non- Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard
School Magnet program by definition.
School is 70/30 and exceeds

capacity. New students entering
at the break grades and
4 Woodrow Wilson Montessori SWP Montessori Same Same replacement students provide
enrollment
the opportunity to improve the
diversity toward the district-wide
average for elementary schools.
NOTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum; 3. Improved Student Achievement (Academic Excellence); 4. Professi
Development/Specialized Teaching Staff (supporting the magnet theme); 5. Dynamic Partnerships (Parent and Community Involvement); 6. Building Capacity.
NOTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8$ non-minority
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
the student What is the Is there evidence of Is there evidence of
population within Is there evidence of a Student specialized Dynamic Current
Is there Test-
2% of the district Unique and Achievement: Professional Partnerships Enrollment as % Minority % Non-Minority
Based Criteria
wide average of InnovativeTheme Accountability Development and (Parent and of October 29, Enrollment Enrollment
for entrance?
92% minority /8% Based Curriculum? Rating: TAKS Specialized Teaching Community 2010
non-minority 2009-2010? Staff? Involvement)?
respectively?
No Not theme-based Yes Recognized Yes Yes 845 83% 17%
No Yes No Recognized Yes Limited 778 98% 2%
No Yes No Recognized Yes Yes 642 99% 1%
Academically
No Yes No Yes Limited 599 99% 1%
acceptable
No Yes No Recognized Not evident Yes 828 99% 1%
No Yes No Exemplary Yes Yes 390 99% 1%
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No Not theme based Yes Recognized Not evident Not evident 670 99% 1%
PD is not specific to Improver Parent

No Yes No Exemplary 599 100% 0%
program theme involvement
No Yes No Exemplary Yes Not evident 975 99% 1%
Improve Parent
No Yes No Recognized Yes 878 99% 1%
involvement
No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Not evident 612 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No MSAP funded MSAP funded Exemplary MSAP funded MSAP funded 560 98% 2%
Yes, transitioning to an Specific IB PYP PD is

Yes No Recognized Not evident 489 83% 17%
IB PYP needed
Academically Yes, with universities

No Yes No Not evident 488 96% 4%
acceptable and hospitals
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No evidence for PD for

Yes, mission statement
Academically magnet, no evidence of
No should be reviewed and No Not evident 352 99% 1%
acceptable principal leadership for
include the magnet focus
magnet theme
Yes, and in a feeder

Professional learning Excellent techniqies
pattern that gives
community, data teams, for fundrasing,
No students an opportunity No Exemplary 688 69% 31%
seeking authorization to attracting donors and
to receive an IB diploma,
become an IB program unique partnerships
also very rigorous
Yes, all the curriculum is

Yes Yes Recognized Yes Yes 533 91% 9%
online
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No No Yes Recognized Not evident Yes 747 75% 25%
Yes, goal for

implemenation of Yes, recommend
No No Recognized Yes 959 100% 0%
technology of 25% per expanding
day
Magnet coordinator Needs to match the

No Yes, 5 themes No Exemplary serves as assistant focused Academy 610 43% 57%
principal theme
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Yes Yes Yes Exemplary PD is evident Yes 592 60% 40%
Yes, however really Yes, and increase PD in

No needs additional No Exemplary gardening and Additional is needed 717 98% 2%
technology SUStainability
Yes, but not evident

No No Recognized Limited Yes 737 99% 1%
consistently
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Yes, reported that

Yes, leadership shared 98% family
No continuous improvement No Exemplary Yes, evident participation in 707 100% 0%
of the learning focus quarterly student
projects
Yes, utilize the space to Theme based PD is not

No No Recognized Not evident 733 92% 8%
support their theme evident
Evident, teachers have a

lot of experience yet arts
Yes, literacy-based fine
No No Exemplary classes appear to be Not evident 681 70% 30%
arts
taught in isolation from
core area courses
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Principal and magnet

No Yes No Recognized coordinator work well Not evident 483 99% 1%
together
No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Yes 760 58% 42%
Emphasis on
professional learning Strong parent
No Yes No Exemplary 840 78% 22%
communities and involvement
collaborative planning
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Teachers could benefit

from theme alike
No Yes No Exemplary Evident 824 97% 3%
meetings and
conferences
No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Yes Yes 356 100% 0%
Well trained teachers

Yes, and school should
with strong arts
No Yes No Recognized seek additional arts 725 66% 34%
curriculum, need training
related partners
in arts integration
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Yes, new technology and

Yes, with local
No updated science No Exemplary Evident 522 99% 1%
museums
materials are needed
Yes Yes No Recognized Evident Evident 601 91% 9%
See Middle
Yes Yes No Recognized Evident Evident 671 See Middle School
School
No Not theme based Yes Exemplary Evident Evident 680 49% 51%
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Not evident 746 56% 44%
No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident Evident 611 99% 1%
Evident; Needs to
No Yes No Exemplary Evident 462 100% 0%
expand
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No Yes No Recognized Evident Increase partnerships 534 99% 1%
No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Limited 606 99% 1%
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No Yes No Exemplary Evident Increase partnerships 532 81% 19%
Strong parent See Middle

No No Yes Exemplary Evident 384 See Middle School
partnerships School
No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident Evident 732 59% 41%
No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Not evident 787 46% 54%
Yes, for the after school

No No Recognized Evident Evident 623 99% 1%
program
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
Academically
Yes Yes No Not evident Not evident 794 95% 5%
acceptable
No Yes No Exemplary Evident Evident 464 99% 1%
No Yes No Exemplary Not evident Not evident 1,180 33% 67%
No MSAP MSAP Recognized MSAP MSAP 482 97% 3%
Strong parent
Yes Yes Yes Recognized Evident 425 92% 8%
involvement
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of
Is there Test-
Based Criteria
for entrance?
respectively?
No Not theme based Yes Recognized Evident 749 99% 1%
Academically
No Yes No Evident Evident 489 70% 30%
acceptable
e); 4. Professional
01/07/2011
Total Principal
2010-2011 2010-2011 % Minority % Non-Minority
% Free/Reduced % Magnet to % Non-Zoned 2010-2011 2010-2011 Transfer
Total Magnet Transfer Transfer
Lunch Enrollment to Enrollment Applications Accepted Agreements as
Magnet Non-Zone Agreements Agreements
of 10.29.10
66% 273 32.31% 146 17.28% 128 77 18 83% 17%
84% 670 86.12% 193 24.81% 102 93 1 100% 0%
98% 530 82.55% 205 31.93% 122 119 34 100% 0%
96% 535 89.32% 162 27.05% 83 83 7 100% 0%
94% 795 96.01% 68 8.21% 100 98 4 100% 0%
94% 198 50.77% 97 24.87% 63 63 6 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
93% 177 26.42% 99 14.78% 134 82 76 97% 3%
92% 235 39.23% 110 18.36% 77 77 96 100% 0%
89% 244 25.03% 217 22.26% 112 92 13 92% 8%
96% 744 84.74% 132 15.03% 55 52 6 100% 0%
95% 239 39.05% 156 25.49% 125 68 79 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
93% 315 56.25% 227 40.54% 260 147 15 100% 0%
77% 423 86.50% 203 41.51% 139 137 25 100% 0%
99% 413 84.63% 55 11.27% 48 43 2 100% 0%
96% 646 92.02% 30 4.27% 38 38 Not available Not available Not available
89% 787 83.90% 225 23.99% 90 87 20 95% 5%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
95% 284 80.68% 116 32.95% 35 34 39 100% 0%
45% 623 90.55% 396 57.56% 257 81 24 79% 21%
71% 322 60.41% 208 39.02% 130 106 21 95% 5%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
50% 323 43.24% 223 29.85% 264 101 105 80% 20%
97% 849 88.53% 178 18.56% 56 54 51 98% 2%
11% 610 100.00% 159 26.07% 352 79 18 44% 56%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
23% 331 55.91% 306 51.69% 450 81 5 60% 40%
88% 169 23.57% 97 13.53% 108 79 70 100% 0%
93% 548 74.36% 81 10.99% 60 59
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
80% 623 88.12% 259 36.63% 175 171 22 100% 0%
73% 687 93.72% 288 39.29% 207 145 21 100% 0%
41% 673 98.83% 496 72.83% 437 249 7 57% 43%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
69% 358 74.12% 299 61.90% 187 109 9 100% 0%
40% 363 47.76% 257 33.82% 261 100 80 71% 29%
53% 605 72.02% 463 55.12% 452 232 13 92% 8%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
90% 721 87.50% 117 14.20% 54 52 1 100% 0%
94% 97 27.25% 27 7.58% 62 37 4 100% 0%
45% 693 95.59% 212 29.24% 244 56 23 61% 39%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
96% 496 95.02% 282 54.02% 48 48 77 99% 1%
70% 528 87.85% 358 59.57% 182 115 66 92% 8%
See Middle School 659 98.21% 656 97.76% 596 165
10% 533 78.38% 414 60.88% 560 115 12 67% 33%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
11% 723 96.92% 157 21.05% 426 32 2 50% 50%
86% 206 33.72% 161 26.35% 82 54 137 98% 2%
95% 162 35.06% 94 20.35% 56 56 71 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
88% 165 30.90% 160 29.96% 221 178 32 97% 3%
93% 542 89.44% 117 19.31% 47 44 22 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
70% 461 86.65% 147 27.63% 91 90 6 83% 17%
See Middle School 270 70.31% 270 70.31% 483 60 Not available Not available Not available
40% 311 42.49% 189 25.82% 269 78 114 56% 44%
16% 764 97.08% 175 22.24% 407 28 31 65% 35%
87% 147 23.60% 58 9.31% 82 55 25 100% 0%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
82% 181 22.80% 56 7.05% 67 63 76 95% 5%
100% 404 87.07% 59 12.72% 22 21 37 100% 0%
2% 1180 100.00% 66 5.59% 407 24 2 100% 0%
92% 455 94.40% 118 24.48% 150 141
73% 369 86.82% 328 77.18% 191 68 4 75% 25%
01/07/2011
Total Principal
of 10.29.10
90% 150 20.03% 79 10.55% 146 60 69 99% 1%
57% 333 68.10% 215 43.97% 272 107 55 60% 40%
01/07/2011
%
Free/Reduced/Othe Magnet Per
Adjusted Total School
r Economic Permanent Utilization w/T- Magnet Budget Pupil
Permanent Budget-All Funding
Disadvantage Utilization Buildings (Actual) Expenditure
Capacity Sources (Actual)
Lunch Transfer (Actual)
Agreements
50% 543 156% 99% $3,484,876.00 $144,750.00 $530.22
100% 669 116% 101% $3,512,766.00 $335,999.00 $501.49
New building
New building under New building
97% under $2,931,274.00 $272,265.00 $513.71
construction under construction
construction
100% 732 82% 82% $2,768,064.00 $312,099.00 $583.36
100% 878 94% 76% $3,695,520.00 $236,498.00 $297.48
100% 690 57% 57% $1,893,788.00 $270,512.00 $1,366.22
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
92% 753 89% 78% $2,949,722.00 $101,166.00 $571.56
90% 627 96% 72% $2,622,528.00 $278,930.00 $1,186.94
54% 543 180% 60% $4,280,741.00 $285,666.00 $1,170.76
100% 732 120% 75% $3,929,999.00 $205,306.00 $275.95
89% 815 75% 68% $2,760,542.00 $114,777.00 $480.24
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
100% 941 60% 60% $2,309,360.00 $204,357.00 $648.75
92% 480 102% 63% $2,077,525.00 $148,261.00 $350.50
100% 459 106% 35% $2,317,318.00 $270,993.00 $656.16
Not available 815 86% 86% $2,907,061.00 $18,750.00 $29.02
90% 690 136% 104% $4,230,324.00 $407,622.00 $517.94
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
95% see middle school Not available Not available $1,513,452.00 $121,767.00 $428.76
67% 690 100% 100% $2,777,073.00 $186,753.00 $299.76
81% 376 142% 98% $2,171,976.00 $30,000.00 $93.17
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
46% 940 79% 58% $3,115,073.00 $195,237.00 $604.45
92% 732 131% 104% $4,044,895.00 $15,000.00 $17.67
17% 857 71% 50% $2,543,898.00 $270,323.00 $443.15
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
0% 480 123% 89% $2,393,028.00 $214,721.00 $648.70
93% 920 78% 78% $3,098,981.00 $119,620.00 $707.81
543 101% $3,012,842.00 $144,527.00 $263.74
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
86% 836 85% 64% $2,928,966.00 $249,340.00 $400.22
86% 774 95% 95% $3,172,189.00 $340,856.00 $496.15
14% 836 81% 56% $3,019,067.00 $362,559.00 $538.72
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
78% 564 86% 68% $2,190,633.00 $314,168.00 $877.56
36% 795 96% 96% $3,146,850.00 $185,119.00 $509.97
62% 815 103% 98% $3,671,453.00 $418,123.00 $691.11
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
100% 1,045 79% 30% $3,556,014.00 $188,599.00 $261.58
100% 753 47% 47% $1,694,257.00 $129,058.00 $1,330.49
52% 648 112% 89% $3,216,993.00 $369,839.00 $533.68
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
97% 418 125% 83% $2,250,184.00 $143,260.00 $288.83
79% 669 90% 82% $2,503,331.00 $184,785.00 $349.97
Include all funding Combine funding

inlcude as K-8
see middle school combined Unique PUA - note that it is K-
funding
if needed 8
33% 648 105% 105% $2,855,447.00 $215,972.00 $405.20
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
0% 543 137% 97% $3,134,983.00 $350,585.00 $484.90
need plans -
82% $2,687,824.00 $107,328.00 $521.01
replace on site
100% 397 116% 74% $2,005,978.00 $164,213.00 $1,013.66
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
94% 391 137% NOt available $2,469,110.00 $30,000.00 $181.82
86% 459 132% 132% $2,807,779.00 $255,341.00 $471.11
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
67% 480 111% 64% $2,255,758.00 $228,223.00 $495.06
Include all funding Combine funding

inlcude as K-8
Not available see middle school Not available Not available combined Unique PUA - note that it is K-
funding
if needed 8
31% 669 109% 109% $2,880,079.00 $105,039.00 $337.75
26% 815 97% 97% $3,299,687.00 $320,617.00 $419.66
New building
New building under New building
72% under $2,533,492.00 $22,500.00 $153.06
construction under construction
construction
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
79% 438 181% 64% $3,406,472.00 $230,980.00 $1,276.13
100% 565 82% 44% $2,055,798.00 $196,335.00 $485.98
0% 1,045 113% 107% $4,687,858.00 $273,480.00 $231.76
501 96% 68% $2,019,992.00 $135,454.00 $297.70
50% 195 218% 91% $1,988,784.00 $101,480.00 $275.01
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
90% 543 138% 66% $3,207,495.00 $161,019.00 $1,073.46
44% 313 156% 96% $2,040,409.00 $224,148.00 $673.12
01/07/2011
Middle School Magnets
Current Proposed
District
Program Current Program Program Proposed Program Recommendation
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL

4 Attucks Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to the
Apollo program.
Remove Magnet designation and Magnet

1 Burbank Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
transportation
Significantly revise Magnet school to a

STEM Magnet school; Monitor diversity in
7 Clifton Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM
student enrollment to improved on the
district-wide average.
Contemporary Learning Center School Remove Magnet designation and Magnet

4 SUS Alternative Non-Magnet
Middle School closure funding
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Significantly revise Magnet to incorporate

Communications/
3 Deady Middle School SWAS Communications SWP Journalism and writing. Improve diversity
Journalism
in school enrollment.

9 Dowling Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to the
Apollo program.
Improve diversity in student enrollment

2 Fleming Middle School SWAS Fine Arts same same
to reduce minority group isolation.
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Magnet Schools Assistance Program

5 Fondren Middle School SWAS Math/Science MSAP IB
(MSAP).
Gregory-Lincoln Middle School Significantly revise Magnet to a school

8 SWAS Fine Arts SWP Museum Magnet
(K-8) wide Museum Studies Magnet

1 Hamilton Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
transportation
Significantly revise Magnet school to a

STEM Magnet school; Improve diversity in
3 Hartman Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM
student enrollment; become a feeder
school to Chavez.
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Significantly revise Magnet program to a

dual language/IB MYP program; articulate
1 Hogg Middle School SWAS Math/Science same Dual Language/IB
with Helms to develop a strong feeder
program. .

2 Holland Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
transportation

8 Jackson Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
transportation
School exceeds capacity and enrollment

should be monitored to ensure dthat
5 Johnston Middle School SWAS Fine Arts same same
Neighborhood and Magnet enrollments
do not exceed builidng capacity.

2 Key Middle School SWAS Foreign Languages SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to the
Apollo program.
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL

4 Lanier Middle School SWVP Vanguard DWVP Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
transportation
5 Long Middle School SWVP Vanguard SWP 6-12 Medical Significantly revise to 6-12 Magnet.

school wide technology and engineering
Technology and Magnet as a feeder to Washington; invest
2 M. C. Williams Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP
Engineering in the school's technology; ensure high
value added standards; improve diversity
in school enrollment.
1 Marshall Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same Improve diversity in student enrollment.

Neighborhood
2 Patrick Henry Middle School SWAS Fine Arts Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to limited
School
building capacity to meet criteria
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Monitor diversity in student enrollment,

particularly non-zone. Continue to
5 Pershing Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP same monitor neighborhood, Non-zone, and
Magnet enrollments do not exceed
bulidng capacity.
Improve diversity in student enrollment;

5 Pin Oak Middle School SWAS Languages same same
eliminate entrance testing- policy
Expand theme to a STEM initiative;

6 Revere Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM
Improve diversity in student enrollment.
Dedicated
5 Rice Middle School (K-8) SUS Technology same Improve diversity in student enrollment.
Magnet
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL

4 Ryan Middle School SWVP Vanguard SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to the
Apollo program.
Significantly revise the theme to become

6 Sharpstown Middle School SWAS Leadership SWP International Studies The School for International Studies
grades 6-12.
Monitor school enrollment and Improve

3 Stevenson Middle School SWAS Math/Science SWP STEM diversity in student enrollment to reduce
minority group isolation.

T. H. Rogers Middle School Dedicated
7 SUS Vanguard Non-Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard status and
(K-8) DWVP
transportation
01/07/2011
Current Proposed
District
Area
Type Type
MIDDLE SCHOOL

Health and Physical
9 Welch Middle School SWAS Fine Arts SWP Health and Physical Fitness program;
Fitness
improve diversity in school enrollment.
NOTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum; 3. Improved Student Achievement (Academic Excellence); 4.
NOTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8% non-minority.
01/07/2011
Is the diversity of the Is there evidence of

What is the Student
student population Is there evidence of a specialized
Is there Test-Based Achievement:
within 2% of the Unique and Professional
Recommendation Rationale Criteria for Accountability
district wide average of InnovativeTheme Development and
entrance? Rating: TAKS 2009-
92% minority/ 8% non- Based Curriculum? Specialized Teaching
2010?
minority respectively? Staff?
By developing a school-wide accelerated

program in the content areas through the
Apollo support program, students are No Yes No Recognized Not evident
more likely to be focused and perform at
a higher level.
Vanguard SW is not considered a Magnet

No No Yes Exemplary Not evident
program by definition.
An expansion of the current theme to

include Engineering and Technology will
bring the program in line with the top
No Yes No Exemplary Evident
magnet themes. Increasing the pool of
non-minority students should assist in
improving the school's diversity.

No Yes No Acceptable Not evident
requirements.
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?
As the current theme is limited, the

recommendation to expand with
emphasis on Journalism (writing) should
offer students more opportunities to
explore the entire field of No Yes No Recognized Not evident
Communications. Changing to a SWP
and implementing aggressive recruiting,
diversity should improve. Goal is 2% (-/
+)

Yes - audition-based Academically
Apollo support program, students are No No Not evident
entrance Acceptable
a higher level.
The school is 100% minority and under-

enrolled. Through aggressive marketing
Yes - audition-based Academically
and recruiting, increasing the pool of No No Yes
entrance Acceptable
reducing MGI by 2% each year.
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?
Academically
Same No Yes No MSAP
Unacceptable
Museum Studies is a very popular theme

Leadership did not
for students and parents. The theme Yes - audition-based Academically
No No indicate the need for
should boost enrollment and improve entrance Acceptable
ongoing PD
diversity as well.

No Yes Recognized Yes

No Yes No Recognized Evident
Magnet themes. Increasing the pool of
improving the school's diversity.
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?
SWP affords all students to participate in

the Dual Language program. School has
capacity and diversity of 97/3% should
be (-/+) 2% each year over the next 3
No Yes No Recognized Evident
years. As a Dual Language program,
articulated with Helms ES, this goal
should be achievable and a strong feeder
pattern established.

No No Yes Exemplary Yes
Vanguard SW is not considered a Magnet Academically

No No Yes Yes
program by definition. Acceptable
Monitor enrollments to ensure all

Yes - audition-based
students are adequately prepared in the No No Recognized Yes
entrance
Academic and Fine Arts curriculum.

Apollo support program, students are No Yes No Recognized Not evident
a higher level.
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?

No No Yes Recognized Evident
See district plans in development for a 6-

No No Yes Exemplary Evident
12 articulated program.
Implementing this recommended plan

will enhance the academic curriculum
and provide for an articulated strand
from middle to high school. Moving to a
No Yes No Recognized Strong PD evident
school-wide program will allow the school
to recruit more non-minority students to
improve the diversity toward the district-
wide average.
School is 97%/3% diverse. Recruitment

must be geared toward improving the Yes - audition-based
No No Recognized Evident
current diversity (-/+) by 2% each year entrance
Does not meet Magnet program Yes - audition-based Academically

No No Not evident
definition. entrance Acceptable
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?
School is 82%/18% diverse with 98% Yes - audition-based

No Yes Recognized Limited
non-zone students. entrance
School is 62%/38% diverse. Recruitment

Limited, auditor made
must be geared toward improving the
No Yes Yes Recognized suggestions on more
current diversity (+/-) by 2% each year
targeted PD

Academically
magnet themes. Increasing the pool of Yes Yes No Strong commitment to PD
Acceptable
improving the school's diversity. School
is only at 68% utilization.
The school is 97% minority and under

enrolled. Through aggressive marketing
and recruiting, increasing the pool of Yes Yes No Recognized Evident
reducing MGI by 2% each year.
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?

Apollo support program, students are No Yes Exemplary Evident
a higher level.
Plans are already in place to become a 6-

12 school in combinations with The High PD through theme-specific
No Yes No Recognized
School for International Studies currently training.
housed at Sharpstown MS.

Academically
Magnet themes. Increasing the pool of No Yes No Evident
Acceptable
non-zoned should assist in improving the
school's diversity. School exceeds
capacity.

No Yes Yes Exemplary Evident
01/07/2011

What is the Student
2010?
With low enrollment and high minority

group isolation of 99%/1% respectively,
developing a new initiative and Yes - audition-based
No No Recognized Strong commitment to PD
aggressive recruiting should create entrance
interest and improve diversity. Goal is
2% (-/+) each year.
hievement (Academic Excellence); 4. Professional

pacity.
01/07/2011
Current
Is there evidence of
Enrollment 2010-2011 2010-2011 % Non-Zoned
Dynamic Partnerships % Minority % Non-Minority % Free/Reduced % Magnet to 2010-2011 2010-2011
as of Total Magnet Magnet to
(Parent and Community Enrollment Enrollment Lunch Enrollment Applications Accepted
October Magnet Non-Zone Enrollment
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Not evident 506 99% 1% 92% 89 17.59% 16 3.16% 44 34
Evident 1,261 99% 1% 96% 254 20.14% 126 9.99% 277 115
Limited 1,002 93% 7% 85% 474 47.31% 314 31.34% 405 336
Not evident 117 Non available 97 82.91% 97 82.91% 111 111
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Not evident 872 99% 1% 96% 287 32.91% 37 4.24% 47 47
Yes 1,302 100% 0% 87% 340 26.11% 16 1.23% 316 297
Yes 528 100% 0% 93% 181 34.28% 122 23.11% 118 110
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
MSAP 608 98% 2% 92% 78 12.83% 28 4.61% 69 55
Limited partnerships 704 98% 2% 88% 96 13.64% 87 12.36% 133 126
Yes 1,392 90% 10% 76% 454 32.61% 395 28.38% 629 283
Limited: recommend
increasing business 1,526 99% 1% 91% 307 20.12% 152 9.96% 265 178
partners
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Not noted 733 97% 3% 90% 199 27.15% 128 17.46% 183 150
Yes 750 99% 1% 91% 108 14.40% 37 4.93% 104 48
Yes 912 100% 0% 96% 140 15.35% 29 3.18% 125 52
Yes 1,486 85% 15% 62% 704 47.38% 589 39.64% 963 441
Not evident 486 99% 1% 90% 72 14.81% 5 1.03% 78 77
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Evident 1,347 63% 37% 33% 891 66.15% 682 50.63% 1016 357
Evident 934 96% 4% 96% 76 8.14% 11 1.18% 61 26
At the beginning stages,

441 99% 1% 92% 120 27.21% 7 1.59% 123 121
recommends expansion
Abundance of community
1,015 97% 3% 94% 257 25.32% 84 8.28% 206 146
partners
Not evident 1,004 98% 2% 96% 181 18.03% 21 2.09% 111 67
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Community partnerships
1,817 82% 18% 53% 454 24.99% 447 24.60% 988 361
evident
Community partners from

several language 1,161 62% 38% 35% 364 31.35% 361 31.09% 1806 276
organizations
Evident 883 95% 5% 89% 171 19.37% 118 13.36% 177 149
Extensive partnerships 1,145 97% 3% 60% 473 41.31% 467 40.79% 623 84
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Evident 329 99% 1% 92% 12 3.65% 4 1.22% 18 7
Limited 598 64 10.70% 26 4.35% 54 38
Evident 1,396 98% 2% 90% 434 31.09% 279 19.99% 380 201
Evident 846 77% 23% 34% 365 43.14% 365 43.14% 288 99
01/07/2011
Current
Involvement)?
29, 2010
Corporate sponsors and

local performance entities 1,098 99% 1% 88% 230 20.95% 90 8.20% 152 61
evident as partners
01/07/2011
%
% Non- Free/Reduced/Other Total School
Total Principal % Minority Adjusted Magnet Magnet Per Pupil
Minority Economic Permanent Utilization Budget-All
Transfer Transfer Permanent Budget Expenditure
Transfer Disadvantage Lunch Utilization w/T-Buildings Funding Sources
Agreements Agreements Capacity (Actual) (Actual)
Agreements Transfer (Actual)
Agreements
21 100% 0% 95% 956 53% 44% $2,532,005.00 $159,445.00 $1,791.52
195 98% 2% 94% 1,144 110% 63% $5,549,762.00 $74,607.00 $293.73
59 97% 3% 80% 938 107% 86% $4,234,122.00 $78,903.00 $166.46
See High
Not available Not available Non available Not available Not available Not available $606,473.00 $0.00 $0.00
School
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
65 100% 0% 100% 1,388 63% 63% $3,895,601.00 $45,000.00 $156.79
16 94% 6% 94% 1,256 104% 72% $5,745,968.00 $195,410.00 $574.74
65 100% 0% 98% 1,031 51% 51% $2,575,285.00 $147,264.00 $813.61
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
23 100% 0% 100% 956 64% 44% $2,823,402.00 $60,654.00 $777.62
35 100% 0% 91% 938 75% 75% $1,628,943.00 $160,333.00 $1,670.14
279 89% 11% 67% 1,069 130% 124% $5,857,649.00 $71,880.00 $158.33
89 100% 0% 93% 1,444 106% 106% $6,413,673.00 $61,664.00 $200.86
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
113 99% 1% 93% 1,013 72% 69% $3,151,564.00 $57,060.00 $286.73
36 100% 0% 92% 919 82% 75% $3,204,412.00 $43,176.00 $399.78
67 100% 0% 97% 1,369 67% 56% $4,060,188.00 $77,787.00 $555.62
131 92% 8% 74% 1,313 113% 72% $6,210,874.00 $273,427.00 $388.39
16 88% 13% 94% 1,256 39% 38% $2,517,096.00 $187,128.00 $2,599.00
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
61 75% 25% 33% 1,163 116% 106% $5,495,291.00 $121,067.00 $135.88
18 94% 6% 94% 1,088 86% 64% $3,217,611.00 $92,523.00 $1,217.41
5 100% 0% 100% 975 45% 45% $2,183,291.00 $44,817.00 $373.48
86 99% 1% 92% 1,313 77% 66% $4,244,953.00 $45,000.00 $175.10
11 100% 0% 100% 994 101% 84% $4,343,172.00 $45,000.00 $248.62
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
197 95% 5% 67% 1,631 111% 111% $7,286,614.00 $159,334.00 $350.96
126 67% 33% 32% 1,200 97% 97% $4,648,491.00 $60,000.00 $164.84
48 96% 4% 94% 1,294 68% 68% $3,727,412.00 $62,524.00 $365.64
Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,056 108% 108% $2,448,263.00 $145,237.00 $307.05
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
37 97% 3% 95% 956 34% 34% $1,676,027.00 $49,894.00 $4,157.83
Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,106 88% 72% $224,116.00 $3,501.81
6 100% 0% 100% 1,144 122% 101% $5,929,437.00 $45,000.00 $103.69
Not available Not available Non available Not available 1,368 62% 62% $3,310,909.00 $5,604.00 $15.35
01/07/2011
%
Agreements
95 100% 0% 88% 863 127% 64% $4,653,990.00 $84,712.00 $368.31
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
District Proposed Proposed
HIGH SCHOOL Program Current Program Recommendation
Area Program Type Program
Type

associated Magnet funding due to
Neighborhood/CT
8 Austin High School SWAS Teaching professions
E
Non-Magnet low interest (only 8% of students
enrolled select the Magnet
program) to meet criteria.
Promote CTE and individual

programs. Improve diversity in
student enrollment; increase
Barbara Jordan High Dedicated
2
School for Careers
SUS Careers
Magnet
same program enrollment and
community partnerships.
Commission a study to review the
CTE program.

5 Bellaire High School SWAS World Languages Neighborhood Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
building capacity to meet criteria.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type

Carnegie Vanguard High Dedicated
9
School
SUS Vanguard
Vanguard
Non-Magnet Magnet funding; Retain Vanguard

Environmental Neighborhood
3 Chavez High School SWAS Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
Science School w/ CTE

Contemporary Learning
4 SUS Alternative repurpose Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
Center High School
low enrollment at school.

Hotel Restaurant Neighborhood limited building capacity and low
1 Davis High School SWAS Non-Magnet
Mgmt School w/ CTE interest (only 12% of students
enrolled select the Magnet
program) to meet criteria.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type
Neighborhood Remove Magnet designation and

8 Furr High School SWAS Technology/Fine Arts Non-Magnet
School w/ CTE associated Magnet funding.
High School for Law

Dedicated Improve diversity in student
8 Enforcement and SUS Law/Criminal Justice same
Criminal Justice
Magnet enrollment.
High School for

Performing/Visual Dedicated Improve diversity in student
4 Performing and Visual SUS same
Arts
Arts Magnet enrollment.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type

2 Kashmere High School SWAS Music/Fine Arts SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
the Apollo program.

Business Neighborhood/CT
7 Lamar High School SWAS Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
Administration E

7 Lee High School SWAS Modern Humanities SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
the Apollo program.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type
Meteorology/ Neighborhood Remove Magnet designation and

9 Madison High School SWAS Non-Magnet
Space Science School w/ CTE associated Magnet funding.

Michael E. DeBakey High Dedicated enrollment; assess professional
4 SUS Health Professions same
School for Health Profess Magnet development needs to ensure
training is theme-based.

3 Milby High School SWAS Science Institute Non-Magnet
School w/CTE associated Magnet funding..
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type

limited building capacity to meet
criteria. However, this program is
of high interest to over 29% of
Neighborhood
1 Reagan High School SWAS Technology Non-Magnet students; therefore, the district
school w/CTE
may consider limiting the number
of Principal Agreement transfers in
order to open up spaces for Magnet
students and thus address building
capacity.

7 Scarborough High School SWAS Arch/Graphic Design Non-Magnet
School w/ CTE associated Magnet funding..
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type

6 Sharpstown High School SWAS Leadership Academy SWP Non- Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
the Apollo program.

Neighborhood
4 Sterling High School SWAS Aviation Sciences Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
School w/ CTE
low student interest/enrollment.
Improve diversity, student

enrollment, and student
achievement. Since this school
Research/ draws a large number of non-zoned
1 Waltrip High School SWAS same same
Technology students, and the school is CTE
focused further review is
warranted. This school should be
part of the CTE review study.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type
Significantly revise Magnet to a

Technology and
2 Washington High School SWAS Engineering SWP school- wide technology and
Engineering
engineering school.

Fine Arts Coalition Neighborhood building capacity to meet criteria.
9 Westbury High School SWAS Non-Magnet
(FACES) School w/ CTE However, if current T-buildings are
operational, a revised Magnet
program could be implemented.

Neighborhood/CT
6 Westside High School SWAS Technology Non-Magnet associated Magnet funding due to
E
01/07/2011
High School Magnets

Current
Type

Neighborhood
2 Wheatley High School SWAS Technology
School w/ CTE
Non-Magnet limited building capacity,
enrollment, and diversity to meet
criteria.
Significantly revise Magnet program

to a Medical Sciences Magnet
9 Worthing High School SWAS Math/Science/Tech same Medical Sciences
program; Improve diversity in
student enrollment.
Significantly revise Magnet program

Communications/ to include journalism and writing;
4 Yates High School SWAS Communications same
Journalism partner with Deady Middle School
as a feeder.
NOTE: The Essential Elements of Magnet Schools: 1. Diversity of the Student Population; 2. Unique and Innovative Curriculum; 3. Improved Student Achievement (Academic Excellen
NOTE: Minority Group Isolations - Current demographics are 92% minority and 8% non-minority.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
What is the Student Is there evidence of
population within Is there evidence of a
Is there Test- Achievement: specialized Professional
2% of the district Unique and
Recommendation Rationale Based Criteria Accountability Development and
wide average of InnovativeTheme Based
for entrance? Rating: TAKS 2009- Specialized Teaching
92% minority /8% Curriculum?
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
Little evidence of
preparation for high school
requirements due to low student No Yes No Recognized
teacher prep course
interest. offerings
As a CTE School with popular

offerings, recruitment needs to be
aggressive for increased enrollment
to be achieved. Develop stronger Academically
No Yes No Evident
partnerships and business/industry Acceptable
involvement. Diversity should reflect
the district-wide average at a
minimum.

Academically
requirements due to building No Yes Yes Evident
Acceptable
capacity.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
Vanguard SW is not considered a Academically

No No Yes Evident
Magnet program by definition. Acceptable

Targeted for non-magnet
requirements due to building No Yes No Recognized
specific PD
capacity.

requirements due to theme and No No No Recognized Appeared to be limited
unique curriculum theme.

Academically
requirements due to building No Yes No Appropriate and targeted
Unacceptable
capacity and low student interest.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?

requirements due to building
capacity and low student interest
(only about 10% of students select
Academically
the Magnet program) to meet No Yes Yes Weekly PD is evident
Acceptable
criteria. If current T-buildings are
operational, survey the community
to determine if hter is interest and
need for a Magnet program.
Diversity should reflect the district-

No Yes No Recognized Limited
wide average at a minimum.

No Yes Yes Recognized Evident
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
By developing a school-wide
accelerated program in the content
areas through the Apollo support Academically
No Yes Yes
program, students are more likely to Acceptable
be focused and perform at a higher
level.

PD provided for various
requirements due to limited building No Yes No Recognized
disciplines
capacity.
areas through the Apollo support Academically
No Yes No Little evidence
program, students are more likely to Acceptable
level.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
Does not meet magnet program

requirements due to limited building
capacity, low enrollment in Magnet No Yes No Exemplary Strong
program (less than 4%), and
diversity to meet criteria.
Diversity should reflect the district- Evident, more targeted PD

wide average at a minimum. See Yes Yes No Exemplary relevant to the theme is
comment in Col. M. necessary

requirements due to low enrollment
(slighthly less than 12%), and
Academically
diversity of 99% minority. Since No Yes No Limited
Acceptable
space is available, the district may
want to consider a new theme to
attract a diverse student population.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?

requirements due to limited building Teachers need support in
capacity. However, since this is an Academically moving from a teacher
No Yes No
extremely popular program, the Acceptable directed style to student
district should explore options to centered teaching
continue the program.

requirements due to low Yes Yes No Recognized Extensive
enrollment/low interest.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
areas through the Apollo support Academically Use professional learning
No Yes No
program, students are more likely to Unacceptable communities
level.

requirements due to lack of student
No Yes No Recognized Evident but limited
interest. May consider creating a
future magnet program.

wide averge at a minimum. There Career tech-ed focused,
teachers have PD plans yet
are concerns about building Academically
No Yes No claim there is no money and
capacity. The theme and location of Unacceptable
no time for theme-based
the school draws non-zoned training
students.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
This new initiative should attract

new students to the school and Very evident, teaching staff
is diverse and energetic and
improve diversity in student Academically
No Yes No have university professors
enrollment. Diversity should reflect Acceptable
who teach dual credit
the district-wide average at a courses
minimum.

requirements. If current T-buildings
are operational, survey the
No Yes Yes Recognized Evident but limited
community to determine if there is
interest and need for a Magnet
program.

Academically
requirements due to limited building No Yes No Limited due to funding
Acceptable
capacity.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Is the diversity of
the student
2010? Staff?
non-minority
respectively?
Does not meet Magnet program Academically

No Yes No Evident
requirements. Acceptable
This new initiative should attract

new students to the school and
improve diversity in student Academidally
No Yes No No PD specific to magnet
enrollment. Diversity should reflect Acceptable
the district-wide average at a
minimum.
Without revisions and articulation

with Deady MS, remove Magnet
Academically
designation and Magnet funding. No Yes No
Acceptable
Evident
Achievement (Academic Excellence); 4. Professional

Capacity.
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
Dynamic Partnerships % Non- % 2010-2011 2010-2011 % Non-Zoned
Enrollment % Minority % Magnet to 2010-2011 2010-2011
(Parent and Minority Free/Reduced Total Magnet Magnet to
as of October Enrollment Enrollment Applications Accepted
Community Enrollment Lunch Magnet Non-Zone Enrollment
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Evident with local

1,867 99% 1% 94% 164 8.78% 81 4.34% 177 152
colleges
Limited 1,109 98% 2% 80% 1109 100.00% 1105 99.64% 600 476
Evident 3,461 72% 28% 40% 464 13.41% 462 13.35% 1395 378
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Partial 458 56% 44% 28% 458 100.00% 457 99.78% 866 639
Evident 2,758 98% 2% 87% 413 14.97% 301 10.91% 389 306
Not evident 583 Not available 445 76.33% 445 76.33% 248 248
Abundant, business and

1,674 99% 1% 93% 216 12.90% 138 8.24% 233 191
industry and university
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Evident 1,171 97% 3% 93% 124 10.59% 59 5.04% 149 147
Evident 570 97% 3% 73% 568 99.65% 559 98.07% 386 326
Evident 654 49% 51% 16% 655 100.15% 642 98.17% 964 252
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
603 99% 1% 70% 93 15.42% 15 2.49% 103 28
Extensive 3,268 68% 32% 46% 738 22.58% 710 21.73% 1791 1070
Not evident 1,691 96% 4% 88% 126 7.45% 69 4.08% 205 178
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Extensive 2,213 100% 0% 77% 85 3.84% 50 2.26% 172 137
Strong parent
partnerships, evident 866 92% 8% 48% 865 99.88% 855 98.73% 994 422
also with community
Strong alumni
2,190 99% 1% 82% 256 11.69% 192 8.77% 231 180
partnerships
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Very abundant 2,002 96% 4% 79% 591 29.52% 504 25.17% 778 583
Extensive 758 94% 6% 77% 43 5.67% 17 2.24% 130 109
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Evident 1,277 97% 3% 90% 145 11.35% 51 3.99% 143 130
Limited 1,089 99% 1% 77% 88 8.08% 32 2.94% 105 88
Not evident 1,763 88% 12% 70% 521 29.55% 421 23.88% 445 392
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Yes, with high level

engineering partners
908 97% 3% 74% 221 24.34% 144 15.86% 266 130
and awards one with
community partners
Evident but limited 2,163 97% 3% 73% 100 4.62% 68 3.14% 233 70
Strong partnerships
inclusive of universities
3,144 76% 24% 47% 609 19.37% 574 18.26% 907 505
and business and
industry
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
Current
29, 2010
Involvement)?
Evident 1,082 100% 0% 83% 170 15.71% 55 5.08% 134 125
Limited partnerships 939 99% 1% 72% 86 9.16% 21 2.24% 81 74
Limited 1,182 99% 1% 70% 216 18.27% 79 6.68% 198 179
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
Total % Non- Free/Reduced/Oth Magnet Per
% Minority Adjusted Utilization Budget-All Magnet
Principal Minority er Economic Permanent Pupil
Transfer Permanent w/T- Funding Budget
Transfer Transfer Disadvantage Utilization Expenditure
Agreements Capacity Buildings Sources (Actual)
Agreements Agreements Lunch Transfer (Actual)
(Actual)
Agreements
293 100% 0% 94% 2,156 87% 87% $8,802,541.00 $75,222.00 $458.67
Not available Not available Not available Not available 1,913 58% 56% $6,175,924.00 $63,436.00 $57.20
184 79% 21% 39% 2,606 133% 119% $14,154,250.00 $87,480.00 $188.53
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
need new
floor plans -
Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available $2,658,097.00 $389,881.00 $851.27
new schools
at new sites
82 96% 4% 84% 2,213 125% 125% $12,168,628.00 $61,664.00 $149.31
Not available Not available Not available Not available 844 69% 46% $3,628,616.00 $0.00 $0.00
130 98% 2% 85% 1,538 109% 104% $7,275,661.00 $63,226.00 $292.71
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
24 100% 0% 92% 919 127% 83% $3,677,092.00 $50,363.00 $406.15
Not available Not available Not available Not available 675 84% 63% $3,094,948.00 $76,651.00 $134.95
Not available Not available Not available Not available 713 92% 87% $3,600,768.00 $175,074.00 $267.29
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
39 100% 0% 62% 1,125 54% 49% $2,862,275.00 $70,722.00 $760.45
12 92% 8% 58% 2,194 149% 149% $13,731,388.00 $83,797.00 $113.55
53 96% 4% 85% 2,381 71% 57% $7,608,022.00 $60,103.00 $477.01
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
99 100% 0% 72% 1,481 149% 108% $9,752,218.00 $45,518.00 $535.51
825 105% 105% $5,104,627.00 $45,207.00 $52.26
507 99% 1% 85% 3,000 73% 71% $9,640,554.00 $66,871.00 $261.21
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
273 97% 3% 79% 1,781 112% 112% $8,912,089.00 $211,139.00 $357.26
86 92% 8% 80% 1,069 71% 51% $3,583,832.00 $30,000.00 $697.67
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
96 98% 2% 94% 1,331 96% 62% $5,352,342.00 $60,883.00 $419.88
21 100% 0% 71% 1,331 82% 71% $4,793,247.00 $45,363.00 $515.49
296 94% 6% 75% 1,744 101% 91% $7,797,607.00 $62,898.00 $120.73
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
61 100% 0% 80% 1,856 49% 47% $4,161,134.00 $224,601.00 $1,016.29
161 99% 1% 70% 1,856 117% 82% $9,311,594.00 $44,269.00 $442.69
75 85% 15% 49% 2,381 132% 132% $12,893,093.00 $56,352.00 $92.53
01/07/2011
High School Magnets
%
Total School
(Actual)
Agreements
19 100% 0% 84% 1,144 95% 95% $4,790,078.00 $52,720.00 $310.12
47 100% 0% 79% 1,444 65% 55% $4,170,763.00 $77,730.00 $903.84
28 100% 0% 54% 2,325 51% 45% $5,119,062.00 $45,833.00 $212.19
01/07/2011
THEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL
Academy Horn Elementary School
Alternative Contemporary Learning Center Middle School
Arch/Graphic Design Sharpstown Middle School
Aviation Sciences
Business Administration
Careers
Communications Deady Middle School
Communications/Tech Sinclair Elementary School
Dual Language Helms Elementary School
Dual Language William Wharton K-8 Dual Language Academy
World Languages Kolter Elementary School Key Middle School
World Languages Pin Oak Middle School
World Languages
Engineering
Environmental Science Berry Elementary School
Environmental Science Lantrip Elementary School
Fine Arts Bruce Elementary School

Fine Arts Burrus Elementary School
Fine Arts Codwell Elementary School
Fine Arts Crespo Elementary School
Fine Arts Felix Cook Elementary School
Fine Arts Garden Villas Elementary School Dowling Middle School
Fine Arts Gregory-Lincoln Elementary School Fleming Middle School
Fine Arts Longfellow Elementary School Gregory-Lincoln Middle School
Fine Arts Lovett Elementary School Johnston Middle School
Fine Arts MacGregor Elementary School Marshall Middle School
Fine Arts Parker Elementary School Patrick Henry Middle School
Fine Arts Poe Elementary School Pershing Middle School
Fine Arts Roberts Elementary School Welch Middle School
Fine Arts/Literature Patterson Elementary School
Fine Arts/Literature Scroggins Elementary School
Fine Arts/Literature Twain Elementary School
Fine Arts/Music
Health Professions
Health Science Whidby Elementary School
Hotel Restaurant Mgmt
Integrated Technology Herrera Elementary School
Law/Criminal Justice
Leadership Durham Elementary School
Math/Science Attucks Middle School

Math/Science Clifton Middle School
Math/Science Fondren Middle School
Math/Science Hartman Middle School
Math/Science Hogg Middle School
Math/Science M. C. Williams Middle School
Math/Science Revere Middle School
Math/Science Stevenson Middle School
Math/Sci/Tech Cornelius Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Elrod Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Harvard Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Law Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Lockhart Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Pugh Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Red Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Ross Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Rusk Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Valley West Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Wainwright Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech Wesley Elementary School
Math/Sci/Tech West University Elementary School
Meteorology/Space
Science
Modern Humanities
Montessori Dodson Elementary School
Montessori Woodrow Wilson Montessori
Physical Development Bell Elementary School
Physical Development Burbank Elementary School
Science Institute
Teaching professions
Technology Rice Elementary Rice Middle School
Technology
Technology
Technology/Fine Arts
Technology/Research
Vanguard Askew Elementary School Burbank Middle School
Vanguard Carrillo Elementary School Hamilton Middle School
Vanguard DeZavala Elementary School Holland Middle School
Vanguard Herod Elementary School Jackson Middle School
Vanguard Oak Forest Elementary School Lanier Middle School
Vanguard Pleasantville Elementary School Long Middle School
Vanguard River Oaks Elementary School Ryan Middle School
Vanguard Roosevelt Elementary School T. H. Rogers Middle School
Vanguard T. H. Rogers Elementary School
Vanguard Travis Elementary School
Vanguard Windsor Village Elementary School
HIGH SCHOOL
Contemporary Learning Center High School

Scarborough High School
Sterling High School
Lamar High School
Barbara Jordan High School for Careers

Yates High School
Bellaire High School

Washington High School
Chavez High School
High School for Performing and Visual Arts

Westbury High School
Kashmere High School
Michael E. DeBakey High School for Health Profess
Davis High School
High School for Law Enforcement and Criminal Just
Sharpstown High School
Worthing High School

Madison High School
Lee High School
Milby High School

Austin High School
Reagan High School
Westside High School
Wheatley High School
Furr High School
Waltrip High School
Carnegie Vanguard High School
Proposed
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Program
Apollo-
Accelerated
Curriculum for
Exemplary Schools
(ACES)
Apollo-
Accelerated
Curriculum for
Exemplary Schools
(ACES)
Apollo-
Accelerated
Curriculum for
Exemplary Schools
(ACES)
Apollo-
Accelerated
Curriculum for
Exemplary Schools
(ACES)
Communications/
Journalism
Dual Language William Wharton K-8 Dual Language Academy
Dual Language/IB
Language
Sinclair Elementary School
Immersion
Fine Arts Suzuki
Codwell Elementary School
Violin
Health and
Physical Fitness
IB Durham Elementary School
Literature Lovett Elementary School
Literature Patterson Elementary School
Medical Sciences
6-12 Medical
MSAP Whidby Elementary School
MSAP & Apollo-
Accelerated
Curriculum for
Exemplary Schools
(ACES)
MSAP Grant
Dodson Elementary School
Montessori K-8
Museum Magnet Gregory-Lincoln Elementary School (K-8)
Pre-engineering Wesley Elementary School

Non- Magnet Askew Elementary School
Non- Magnet Bell Elementary School
Non- Magnet Burbank Elementary School
Non- Magnet Carrillo Elementary School
Non- Magnet DeZavala Elementary School
Non- Magnet Elrod Elementary School
Non- Magnet Felix Cook Elementary School
Non- Magnet Herod Elementary School
Non- Magnet Herrera Elementary School
Non- Magnet Law Elementary School
Non- Magnet MacGregor Elementary School
Non- Magnet Oak Forest Elementary School
Non- Magnet Pleasantville Elementary School
Non- Magnet River Oaks Elementary School
Non- Magnet Roberts Elementary School
Non- Magnet Roosevelt Elementary School
Non- Magnet T. H. Rogers Elementary School (K-8)
Non- Magnet Travis Elementary School
Non- Magnet Twain Elementary School
Non- Magnet Wainwright Elementary School
Non- Magnet West University Elementary School
Non- Magnet Windsor Village Elementary School
Non- Magnet Horn Elementary School
Re-zone or become
Scroggins Elementary School
Non-Magnet
Same Berry Elementary School

Same Bruce Elementary School
Same Burrus Elementary School
Same Crespo Elementary School
Same Garden Villas Elementary School
Same Helms Elementary School
Same Kolter Elementary School
Same Lantrip Elementary School
Same Longfellow Elementary School
Same Parker Elementary School
Same Poe Elementary School
Same Rice Elementary (K-8)
Same Woodrow Wilson Montessori
STEM Cornelius Elementary School
STEM Lockhart Elementary School
STEM Pugh Elementary School
STEM Red Elementary School
STEM Ross Elementary School
STEM Valley West Elementary School
STEM/ IB
Rusk Elementary School (K-8)
(PYP and MYP)
STEM/IB Harvard Elementary School
Technology and
Engineering
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Attucks Middle School
Dowling Middle School
Key Middle School
Ryan Middle School
Deady Middle School
Hogg Middle School
Welch Middle School
Long Middle School
Fondren Middle School

Gregory-Lincoln Middle School (K-8)
Burbank Middle School

Contemporary Learning Center Middle School
Hamilton Middle School
Holland Middle School
Jackson Middle School
Lanier Middle School
Patrick Henry Middle School
T. H. Rogers Middle School (K-8)
Fleming Middle School

Johnston Middle School
Marshall Middle School
Pershing Middle School
Pin Oak Middle School
Rice Middle School (K-8)
Clifton Middle School

Hartman Middle School
Revere Middle School
Stevenson Middle School
M. C. Williams Middle School

HIGH SCHOOL
Kashmere High School
Lee High School
Sharpstown High School- International Studies
Yates High School
Worthing High School

Carnegie Vanguard High School
Chavez High School
Contemporary Learning Center High School
Davis High School
Furr High School
Madison High School
Milby High School
Reagan High School
Scarborough High School
Sterling High School
Westbury High School
Wheatley High School
Austin High School

Barbara Jordan High School for Careers
Bellaire High School
High School for Law Enforcement and Criminal Just
High School for Performing and Visual Arts
Lamar High School
Michael E. DeBakey High School for Health Profess
Waltrip High School
Westside High School
Washington High School

Houston ISD 2011 Magnet School Audit Magnet Demographics Charts

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Houston ISD 2011 Magnet School Audit Magnet Demographics Charts

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

2010-2011 HISD Project

Elementary Magnet Schools

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

Does not meet Magnet program

Diversity is 99/1% and needs to

Remove Magnet designation and

Significantly revise Magnet Diversity is 99/1% and needs to

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

Significantly revise Magnet

Significantly revise Magnet Diversity is 99/1%. By revising to

School exceeds capacity and

Remove Magnet designation and

SWP- School Wide Program

Plans are in place to change to IB IB/PYP will provide an improved

Remove Magnet designation and

Remove Magnet designation and

SWP affords all students to

SWP- School Wide Program

Given the proximity of the school

Change theme to STEM to Adding Engineering to the

SWP affords all students to

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

Does not meet Magnet program

As a SWP, one articulated theme

SWP- School Wide Program

Significantly revise Magnet

Marketing the program as a SWP

Remove Magnet designation and Does not meet Magnet program

SWP- School Wide Program

Adding Engineering to the

Develop a on-going program for The Arts curriculum requires

SWP affords all students to

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation-

Remove Magnet designation and

SWP affords all students to

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

SWP affords all students to

SWP- School Wide Program

Adding Engineering to the

Adding Engineering to the

Rename SUS (district wide);

Remove Magnet designation and

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

Remove Magnet designation and

Adding Engineering to the

SWP- School Wide Program

Adding Engineering to the

Currently does not meet magnet

SWP- School Wide Program

A significant revision will

Remove Magnet designation and

Remove Magnet designation and

Remove Magnet designation and

Non-existent Magnet program.

SWP- School Wide Program

Remove Magnet designation and

As a SWP, an articulated Pre-