Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

UAV COMMUNICATIONS PAYLOAD DEVELOPMENT

MAJ Frank Pinkney


U.S. Army CECOM
Fort M o m o W NJ

Mr. Dan Hampel and Mr. Stef DiPierro


BooZAllen and Hamilton
Eatontown, New Jersey

Mr. Brian S . Abbe and Mr. Michael Sheha


Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Pasadena,California

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The Army Communications Electronics Command CECOM S&TCD initiated a multi-year airborne
(CECOM) Space & Terreshial Communications communications range extension program to meet BITS
Directorate (S&TCD) is conductmg a multi-year airbome requirements in the first quarter of FY'95. Surveys were
communications range extension program, primarily in conducted, payloads and associated ground tenninal
support of the Battlefield Information Transmission equipments were defined and testbed and test platform
System (BITS) initiative. As part ofthis program the Jet approaches were selected to validate and demonstrate
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is m d y under contract payload operation prior to intrgration with UAVs. The
to CECOM to design and develop a payload as an CECOM airbome relay applications and payloads are
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based communications designed to be compatible with the Predator and Global
relay package to operate with the Army's High Capacrty Hawk UAVs. Ultimately it is anticipated that the
Trunk Radios (HCTR's) for test, evaluation and payloads will contribute to the DARPA Airborne
demonstrations. The basic functon of this payload is to CommunicationsNode (ACN) program which is planned
simultaneously relay Ml-duplex communication links to to also include transponders for relaying VHF and UHF
and from ground-based HCTR's. The maximum data radio transmissions and for providmg voice and data
rate that will be supported across these fullduplex links service to hand-held terminals.
is 45 Mbps over a range up to 100 miles. Multiple full-
duplex communication links can be supported by this Planned demonstrations are aimed at supporting decisions
UAV payload at the penalty of reduced communication on the production and fieldmg of airbome relays and
range and/or reduced data rate throughput for each link. surrogate satellites. In addition to determining the
In addition to this fullduplex communications c a p a b w , capabilities and limitations of airborne (specifically UAV
a broadcast communication adjunct (at data rates up to based) relays and communications packages, the program
T1) will also be provided. This secondary capability will will validate the performance of wideband airborne relay
utilize the identical uplink subsystem as the fullduplex links, testing the effects of multipath, various antenna
payload but will use an S-band downlink package for configurations, coverage and elevation angles and the
broadcast to a small, hand-held, omnidirectional antenna performance of multi-band transponder payloads. The
based receiver. initial demonstrations are planned for JWID '98 with a
full end-to-end implementation in JWID '99.
This paper provides a description of the payload and its
control system development as well as its potential for its The HCTR relay application is intended to provide up to
use within an airbome communications node. Also a 45 Mbps full duplex capability between Radio Access
testbed will be described which includes a C-12 airplane Points (RAPS) at X-band. The RAP will utilize a multi-
that will be used for the validation and evaluation of this beam phased array ant" that will be capable of
and other payloads developed for UAVs. providmg range extension capability via the airborne

0-7803-4249-61971$10.0Q 0 1997 IEEE


403
relay. The airborne Battlefield Broadcast application will angles anywhere in a 165 degree cone. Other challenges
provide data distribution at rates from 800 to 1500 Kbps included its low noise amplifier (LNA) design
to disadvantaged receivers, i.e.; small receivers with (narrowband with power limitmg circuitry), high rejection
omni-directional antennas. out-of-band filtering characteristics, the high power
amplifier and small size and weight.
The CECOM applications are depicted in Figure1
showing major elements and interfaces for the wideband Whde a number of airborne vehcles can serve as
X-band link and the battlefield broadcast S-band lmk. platforms for CECOM’s ange extension program, the
The HCTR is located at a Ra&o Access Point (RAP) target platform is the Global Hawk. CECOM was a
which serves as a collection and distribution point for a major participant m DARPA’s Airborne Communications
number of end-user radio subscribers. The RAP will be Node (ACN) study program during the summer of 1995
able to maintain simultaneous LOS llnks with other which outlined multiple range extension services
RAPS, and when necessary, connect to other RAPS via mcluding the applications being developed by CECOM.
the airborne relay. The antenna tracking will allow for Other platforms being considered such as the Predator
communications-on-the-move through the relay. can meet near term needs and will be suitable for limited
application. Also, vehicles such as the Aurora Perseus
can provide significant functionality in the areas of
payload capacity, altitude and range and may be used to
demonstrate the CECOM payload capability in 1997
under a Cooperatwe Research and Development
Agreement (CRDA) with Orbital Sciences/Aurora.
Implementing range extension payloads on alternative
vehcles will provide an opportunity for operational
experience and techcal refinements in advance of the
Global Hawk, and demonstrate a degree of platform
flexibility.

CAPABILITY

The primary function of the CECOM airborne relay is to


provide beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) communications
capability to wideband radios, and addhonally to provide
The Battlefield Broadcast application will permit the in- a surrogate broadcast system. It is conceivable that these
theater distribution of data under the direct control of the services will be provided simultaneously with other
local commander. This concept allows small terminals applications (such as Airborne PCS) from the same
with omni-directional antennas to receive data and platform. The area of coverage will be fully illuminated,
imagery at rates up to T1 whde on-the-move. l k s i.e.; the use of spot beams from the UAV to particular
broadcast can be comprised of locally generated data ground ternunals are not anticipated. This implies the use
exclusively, or a combination of local and satellite-based of wide beam type antennas on the UAV. Ideally, the
GBS channels multiplexed at the theater up-link site. relay will use antennas designed to provide uniform
While the Battlefield Broadcast utilizes the X-band relay power density across the coverage area. Thts would
as an uplink, its design readdy supports modification to eliminate the need for ground power control and reduce
allow other on-board systems to provide that feed. the impact of additional path loss at the greater distances
resulting from terrain blockages and multipath.
This payload design has presented many challenges
including the development of a unique and compact The range or area of coverage afforded by an airborne
antenna design that not only is specified for high power platform is a function of its altitude, and the elevation or
ECF transmissions but also has an antenna gain pattern to look angle of the transmitters or receivers. Table 1
help equalize communication link performance along look summarizes values for typical UAVs (or manned aircraft
flying at equivalent altitudes). It can be seen that to get

404
meamngful coverage area, very low elevation angles, on range and variety of manned and unmanned aerial
the order of 5 degrees must be used. The diameter of platforms.
coverage and elevation angle can be traded off dependmg
on the frequency band of use, the environment, and The most important specifications and considerations to
particularly the foliage. The greater flexibihty of the high support platform f l e x i b w are power, size, and weight.
altitude platform w ill permit higher look angles for a Keeping this payload as small, compact, lightweight,and
given area of coverage, andor lower gain antennas on the low power as possible was considered to be of the utmost
platform and temmals. Complete and uniform area importance for this design. Nominal power, weight, and
coverage could be achieved by an antenna on the airbome size specifications for this payload are provided in Table
relay with a wide (approachmg 165 degrees) beam 2. In actualw, the payload that has been developed
pattem appro*- a csc’ shape. Enhan-ent may be exceeds these initial specificatiohs.
possible by stabilizing the antenna on the UAV to
compensate for maneuvenng and ensure downward
pointing at all times. Attenuation resulting from foliage I Specification I Value 1
will severely limit the effectiveness of the lower altitude Power 1000 Watts
UAVs, particulaxly at higher microwave frequencies. For Weight 100 pounds
initial planned demonstration, a terminal to UAV Payload Size 22 in. x 19 in. x 18 in.
separation range of 50 miles is assumed, which yields a Antenna Size 5 in. (height),
footprint diameter of approximately 100 miles.
I I 12 in. (base diameter) I
Table 2 Power, Weight, and Size Specifications

While the S-band payload portion has not yet been


finalized, the total (X and S band) power and weight
values are projected at approxjmately 850 Watts and 85
pounds. Other pertinent high level payload specifications
are provide in Table 3.

Specification Value
T x k Frequency 7.25-7.7517.90-8.40
of Operation GHZ
operational -40 to +40-C
Temperature Range
TABLE 1 Range Relationships operational sea level to
Pressure Range 25,000 feet altitude
PAYLOAD SPECIFICATIONSAND
REQUIREMENTS Table 3 Frequency and Environmental Specifications

One of the major goals in the design and development of In designing this comunications payload to be as
the U.S. Army CECOM’s UAV-based communications flexible as possible, i.e., work with a variety of different
relay payload was to provide as much flexibility as ground terminal equipment, certain basic design strategies
possible without sacrificing its basic h c t i o n a l Q for were implemented. Of particular note, is the choice of
meetmg requirements. Designs for this payload are for frequency conversion implementation, block conversion,
operational compatibihty with CECOM’s HCTR, as versus a more traditional “channeli~ation’~ scheme. The
previously mentioned. However, the current design will block conversion scheme provides maximum ground
not preclude operations with other ground-based terminal use and flexibility. The user on the ground can
terminals or even extensions to provide on-board, setup a frequency coordination scheme without regard or
baseband processing. Consideration was also given to knowledge of any in-band filtering or “channelizing.”
having this payload capable of installation on a wide The tradeoff for this design can be seen in the
consideration for multiple signals through this payload.

405
With a “channelized” design, indwidual signals may be The downlink transmit frequency band is 7.25 to 7.75
isolated in different parts of the operational spectra. GHz. The transmit antenna has been designed to be left
However, with the block conversion configuration, the hand circularly (LHC) polarized to provide adddonal
payload must be designed highly linear to minimize any isolation from the receive payload communications chain.
in-band or even out-of-band intermodulation products and A low data rate (2.4 kbps) telemetry signal is also present
other types of non-linear dstortions that potentially could on t h s downlink. This signal provides information on the
be present. For t h s reason, all of the active devices (i.e., aircraft position as well as the status and health of the
amplifiers) in t h s payload design have been specified to subsystem components that make up this payload (i.e,
operation well below (6 dB or more) their respective TWTA output power level). The broadcast application
saturation points. for this payload will utilize a subset of the uplmk
frequency band (7.95 to 8.00 GHz). This frequency band
PAYLOAD DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION is translated into the following downllnk band: 2.31-
2.36 GHz.
A hgh level block diagram of t h ~ scommunications relay
payload is provided in Figure 2. It includes the followmg A lmk budget analysis for the full-duplex, 45 Mbps, 100
subsystem components: (1) receive antenna, (2) low mile communication range indicates operability with the
noise amplifier (LNA), (3) X-band frequency translator following payload parameters:
(full-duplex capability), (4) S-band frequency translator
(broadcast applications), (5) traveling wave tube Payload transmit power 22.5 watts
amplifier (TWTA) (X-band), (6) isolator (X-band), (7) Payload EIRP 10.4 dBW
power amplifier (S-band), (8) transmit filter (X-band), Payload receiver G/T -2 1 dBldeg. K
(9) transmit antenna (X-band), and (10) transmit filter ( S -
band). A listing of the key components and their accompanymg
specifications is provided in Table 4.

Figure 2 Communications Relay Payload Block Diagram

The receive frequency band (uplink) for both the full-


duplex and broadcast applications is 7.90 GHZ to 8.40
GHz. The receive antenna has been designed to be right
hand circularly (RHC) polarized. This 500 MHz receive
bandwidth can be used for supporting Ml-duplex 45
Mbps communication link between two HCTR ground-
based terminals at communication ranges up to 100 r handling at 25,000
miles. Alternatively, multiple full-duplex communication
links may also be established with a penalty of either Table 4 State of the Art Component Developments
reduced data rate capability or shorter communication
ranges. In addition to these communication lmks, These specifications resulted in new customized designs.
provisions have been made for an in-band low data rate Of particular note is the UAV payload antenna design
(2.4 kbps) control circuit for the payload subsystem which provides a weighted elevation gain pattern favoring
components. towards-the-horizon communications. This antenna
design will also aid in near-far power sharing of multiple

406
ground terminals. A depiction of thls antenna's elevation
pattern is provided Figure 3 below. The antenna(s)- one Three UHF antennas are used for the UHF voice/data
each for transmit and receive- devleoped by Seavey Eng. orderwire and two X-band antennas are used for the
Assoc., are bifilar helical type consisting of two helical wideband transponder located directly beneath the X-
elements located at 180 deg. apart 6om each other, and band transponder's TWTA transmitter ( to prevent
fed with equal amplitude and anti-phase. The antenna excessive RF power loss due to RF transmission media
size is 4 inches long and 0.75 inches in diameter including attenuation), along with an S-band for the battlefield
a radome cap. broadcast function. A GPS antenna will be placed on the
upper fuselage.
$0'

ELNATION ANTENNAPATTERN

Figure 3 X-band Antenna Elevation Pattern


Figure 5 C-12 Axplane Testbed
FLIGHT TEST/ DEMONSTRATION PLATFORM
SUMMARY
An Army C-12C twin turboprop fixed w e d aircraft
has been assigned to CECOM for the Awbome Relay krbome communications relay payloads are being
program. The aircraft is operated by CECOM's Army developed by CECOM for range extension of wideband
Airborne Engineering Evaluation and Support Branch hgh capacity trunk radios and for battlefield broadcast.
(AEESB) located at the Naval Air Engineering Center, The wideband relay will operate in X-band and will have
Lakehurst, NJ. Typically the aircraft will operate at the capability of supporting a full duplex 45 mbps link
20,OOOft and at a speed of approximately 250 mph. As with ground segments deployed up to 100 miles away
part of t h ~ testbed,
s a UHF relay has been installed on the from the airborne platform. The battlefield broadcast
C-12 as part of an end-to-end coordination circuit. The will provide rates up to 1.5 mbps, in S-band, to user
airplane and the layout of the equipment racks is shown terrninals with omni-directional antennas.
in Figure 5 .
The dual band payload has a modular design for use with
In addition to the UHF relay/coordination circuit on- a variety of platforms. Significant reduction in the size,
board equipment includes a spectrum analyzer, power and weight requirements of 4 cu. ft., 1000 W, and
oscilloscope, printer, GPS receiver, and a 100 pounds respectively, were realized. Stringent
communications control panel. The pilots and equipment transponder requirements and design challenges were met
operator are interconnected to the UHF relay. The to acheve electrical performance in the areas of the X-
communications control panel provides selection of band transmitter efficiency and linearity, LNA, filters and
communications modes and settings including crew to antennas with shaped elevation gain patterns. A versatile
pilots intercommunication and voice or data airborne communications relay testbed using a C-12C
comunications/retrannsr"ision with the ground airplane is being implemented to evaluate payloads in
terminals. Additional equipment may be added as support of range extension with .UAVs.
required

407

Вам также может понравиться