Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
x
March 2005, Vol. 112, pp. 340 –345
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics. Data are mean (SD), median Table 2. Operative details. Data are mean (SD), median [range] or
[range] or number. number.
Age (years) 39.5 (4.7) 42.6 (6.7) Transverse incision (n) 12 14 0.48
Parity 0 [0 – 3] 0 [0 – 3] Operating time (min) 118 (40) 114 (27) 0.74
Pre-operative Hb (g/dL) 11.8 (0.7) 12.2 (0.9) Tourniquet time (min) – 52 (17) –
GnRH analogue pretreatment 1 2 No. of fibroids removed 4.5 [1 – 34] 10.5 [1 – 24] 0.35
Previous surgery 2 3 Weight of fibroids (g) 481 (330) 395 (246) 0.44
Uterine size (weeks) 18 (3.7) 17 (2.4) Blood loss (mL) 2359 (1241) 489 (362) <0.0001
D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112, pp. 340 – 345
342 A. TAYLOR ET AL.
Table 3. Post-operative blood loss and transfusion data. Data are mean [SD], median (range), or number (%).
Randomisation was done immediately before surgery, occasions 4 hours apart, bowel obstruction, wound infection,
and patients were not informed of their assignment. wound haemorrhage, chest infection and venous thrombo-
All patients underwent a routine open myomectomy embolism), uterine blood flow (assessed by serial measure-
performed by AT, AM or MS based on the technique ments of the resistance index for the uterine artery) and
described by Buttram.1 The default skin incision was a ovarian function (assessed by changes in serum FSH).
suprapubic transverse one. The uterus was exteriorised and Based on a review of the published literature,7,16 we
the bowels packed away using two large wet swabs. We hypothesised that 75% of our control group would lose
tried to use a single midline anterior uterine incision more than 500 mL of blood compared with 25% of the
whenever possible. Blood loss was assessed by weighing tourniquet. For the probability of a type 1 statistical error
swabs and measuring blood collected by suction. Suction (two-sided) to be less than 0.05 and the probability of a
drains were left in situ for 48 hours. All patients received
peri-operative thromboprophylaxis with anti-embolic stock-
ings and heparin, and antibiotic prophylaxis with co-amoxiclav
(Augmentin, GlaxoSmithKline).
Three tourniquets were applied prior to myomectomy,
one to occlude the uterine arteries and two more to occlude
the left and right ovarian vessels. The broad ligament was
opened anteriorly and the bladder reflected inferiorly.
Next, a small opening was made in the avascular space
in the posterior leaf of the broad ligament on either side of
the uterine isthmus superior to the uterine vessels. A
number 1 polyglactin tie was threaded through the two
holes and tied tightly anteriorly around the cervix at the
level of the internal os using a Roeder slip knot which
could be retightened using a laparoscopic knot pusher if
required.
A 20-cm length of narrow bore plastic tubing (we used a
3-mm Westcott anaesthetic anti-syphon set) was used for
the ovarian tourniquets based on the technique described by
Thompson.15 The tubing was passed through the defect in
the broad ligament and looped around the infundibulopel-
vic ligament lateral to the fallopian tube and ovary. The
two ends of the tubing were threaded through a short length
of 24 Fr Foley catheter tubing, which acted as a cushion,
and pulled tight and held with a small clamp to occlude the
ovarian vessels. The procedure was repeated on the con-
tralateral side.
Women in the control group did not receive tourniquets.
Our primary end point was intra-operative blood loss.
Secondary outcome measures included post-operative
blood loss (assessed by surgical drains and changes in
haemoglobin), blood transfusion rates, operative morbidity Fig. 2. Changes in uterine artery Doppler resistance index. Upper panel,
(return to theatre, pyrexia >38°C on more than two controls; lower panel, treatment.
D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112, pp. 340 – 345
TRIPLE TOURNIQUETS AT OPEN MYOMECTOMY 343
DISCUSSION
results in the control group were considerably in excess of did not appear to be any significant changes observed
what we expected based on a review of the literature. One compared with pre-operative levels. We accept that this is
explanation could be the use of different methods of blood short term data and propose a longer term follow up of
loss collection and estimation as discussed earlier. Another gonadotrophins. Similarly, as for the uterine blood flow
reason for this discrepancy might be differences in the outcomes, the study was not specifically powered to ex-
amount of fibroid tissue removed. Previously published clude an effect on ovarian function and our study might
series do not to include data on the weight of fibroids re- have been underpowered to determine this. However,
moved, and yet it is known that estimation of uterine size reassuringly though, the first patient in the tourniquet group
is only a rough estimate of uterine weight and therefore has recently given birth, having had an uncomplicated full-
fibroid weight. One study, for instance, found that a term pregnancy. This is consistent with data from hetero-
uterus, which on bimanual examination feels equivalent topic autotransplantation in the ewe (an accepted model in
to 20 weeks of gestation, has on average weight of about reproductive endocrinology) which suggests that there is
1000 g, but with a standard deviation of over 500 g.24 As only minimal injury to tissue even after 3 hours of ovarian
intra-operative bleeding is proportional to the amount of vascular occlusion.33
fibroid tissue removed, differences in fibroid weight can In summary, our results clearly demonstrate the effec-
account for major differences in blood loss data.9 tiveness of triple tourniquets and we would strongly advo-
In our study, we chose only to use pre-operative GnRHa cate their routine use at open myomectomy as a safe and
under certain well-defined conditions. Although such pre- convenient alternative to other haemostatic techniques.
treatment can be effective in reducing blood loss at open
myomectomy,25 these drugs are expensive, are associated
with oestrogen deficient side effects, can make the surgery
References
more difficult by causing fibrosis between the tissue planes,
and most importantly, have been shown to be associated
1. Buttram Jr VC. Uterine leiomyomata — aetiology, symptomatology
with an increase in fibroid recurrence at six months.25 and management. Prog Clin Biol Res 1986;225:275 – 296.
Recently, the use of misoprostol as a pre-operative medical 2. Day DB, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cu-
agent has been described but this technique requires further mulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women:
evaluation.26 ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(1):100 – 107.
3. Lippman SA, Warner M, Samuels S, Olive D, Vercellini P, Eskenazi
As an alternative to surgical management of uterine
B. Uterine fibroids and gynecologic pain symptoms in a population-
fibroids, some women have opted for uterine artery embo- based study. Fertil Steril 2003;80(6):1488 – 1494.
lisation (UAE).4 However, this technique is still being fully 4. Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, et al. Arterial embo-
evaluated27 and is not without controversy.28 Current lisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995;346(8976):671 – 672.
guidelines in the United Kingdom, for instance, advise 5. Hospital Episode Statistics. Available: http://www.doh.gov.uk/hes/
against its use in women desiring pregnancy.27 free_data/index.html, 2001.
6. Myers ER, Barber MW, Couchman GM, et al. Management of
The use of an absorbable tourniquet that is left in situ Uterine Fibroids. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. Rock-
around the uterine arteries to reduce peri-operative bleeding ville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality, 2001.
and subsequent pelvic adhesions is a novel idea that we 7. Fletcher H, Frederick J, Hardie M, Simeon D. A randomized com-
believe may still be effective when examined in an appro- parison of vasopressin and tourniquet as hemostatic agents during
priately powered study. It could also be that the use of drain myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87(6):1014 – 1018.
8. Berkeley AS, DeCherney AH, Polan ML. Abdominal myomectomy
volumes is only a crude outcome measure as it reflects not and subsequent fertility. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156(3):319 – 322.
only blood loss but serous fluid that oozes from the uterine 9. Ginsburg ES, Benson CB, Garfield JM, Gleason RE, Friedman AJ.
incisions. The effect of operative technique and uterine size on blood loss during
Until now, there have been no data on uterine vascular myomectomy: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1993;
60(6):956 – 962.
changes following open myomectomy whether tourni-
10. Gehlbach DL, Sousa RC, Carpenter SE, Rock JA. Abdominal
quets are or are not utilised. We do know that following myomectomy in the treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
UAE there is a marked and permanent increase in uterine 1993;40(1):45 – 50.
artery resistance index and a reduction in peak systolic 11. Rubin IC. Uterine fibromyomas and sterility. Clin Obstet Gynecol
velocity.29,30 There was no such increase in the resistance 1958;1(2):501 – 518.
index of the uterine artery in our study. However, the 12. Sapmaz E, Celik H, Altungul A. Bilateral ascending uterine artery
ligation vs. tourniquet use for hemostasis in cesarean myomectomy. A
study was only powered to detect differences in blood comparison. J Reprod Med 2003;48(12):950 – 954.
loss, and not resistance indices. A larger study would be 13. Sapmaz E, Celik H. Comparison of the effects of the ligation of
required to be confident that there is no effect. ascending branches of bilateral arteria uterina with tourniquet method
Also for the first time to our knowledge, we attempted to on the intra-operative and post-operative hemorrhage in abdominal
determine the effect of triple tourniquets on ovarian func- myomectomy cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;111(1):
74 – 77.
tion using changes in serum FSH. Serum FSH is widely 14. Schifano MJ, Hoshaw NJ, Boushka WM, Alvero RJ. Uterine artery
used to evaluate this outcome following UAE.31,32 Al- embolization in a hemorrhaging postoperative myomectomy patient.
though the mean tourniquet time was close to 1 hour, there Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54(1):1 – 3.
D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112, pp. 340 – 345
TRIPLE TOURNIQUETS AT OPEN MYOMECTOMY 345
15. Thompson JD, Rock JA. Leiomyomata uteri and myomectomy. 26. Celik H, Sapmaz E. Use of a single preoperative dose of misoprostol
In: Thompson JD, Rock JA, editors. Te Linde’s Operative Gynaecology. is efficacious for patients who undergo abdominal myomectomy.
Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997:731 – 770. Fertil Steril 2003;79(5):1207 – 1210.
16. Frederick J, Fletcher H, Simeon D, Mullings A, Hardie M. Intra- 27. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical
myometrial vasopressin as a haemostatic agent during myomectomy. Recommendations on the Use of Fibroid Embolisation in the Man-
Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101(5):435 – 437. agement of Uterine Fibroids. Report of a joint working party. London:
17. Bonney V. The technique and results of myomectomy. Lancet 1931; RCOG Press, 2001.
220:171 – 177. 28. Molley D. Uterine artery embolisation (UAE) its current status in
18. Alexander W. M Press & Circular, 1898;66:349. Australia. Scope, Newsletter Australian Gynaecological Society 2004;
19. Lock FR. Multiple myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969;104(5): 24:10 – 12.
642 – 650. 29. McLucas B, Perrella R, Goodwin S, Adler L, Dalrymple J. Role of
20. Rubin IC. The pericervical broad ligament tourniquet for preventive uterine artery Doppler flow in fibroid embolization. J Ultrasound
hemostasis in myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1953;1(6):668 – 671. Med 2002;21(2):113 – 120.
21. Tulandi T, Beique F, Kimia M. Pulmonary edema: a complication of 30. Ochi H, Matsubara K, Kusanagi Y, Taniguchi H, Ito M. Significance
local injection of vasopressin at laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1996; of a diastolic notch in the uterine artery flow velocity waveform
66(3):478 – 480. induced by uterine embolisation in the pregnant ewe. Br J Obstet
22. Nezhat F, Admon D, Nezhat CH, Dicorpo JE, Nezhat C. Life- Gynaecol 1998;105(10):1118 – 1121.
threatening hypotension after vasopressin injection during operative 31. Amato P, Roberts AC. Transient ovarian failure: a complication of
laparoscopy, followed by uneventful repeat laparoscopy. J Am Assoc uterine artery embolization. Fertil Steril 2001;75(2):438 – 439.
Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 2(1):83 – 86. 32. Spies JB, Roth AR, Gonsalves SM, Murphy-Skrzyniarz KM. Ovarian
23. Martin JD, Shenk LG. Intraoperative myocardial infarction after function after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: assess-
paracervical vasopressin infiltration. Anesth Analg 1994;79(6):1201 – ment with use of serum follicle stimulating hormone assay. J Vasc
1202. Interv Radiol 2001;12(4):437 – 442.
24. Cantuaria GH, Angioli R, Frost L, Duncan R, Penalver MA. 33. Jeremias E, Bedaiwy MA, Gurunluoglu R, Biscotti CV, Siemionow
Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination M, Falcone T. Heterotopic autotransplantation of the ovary with
before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 1998; microvascular anastomosis: a novel surgical technique. Fertil Steril
92(1):109 – 112. 2002;77(6):1278 – 1282.
25. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B. Fibroids (uterine myomatosis, leiomyomas).
Clin Evid 2002;(7):1666 – 1678. Accepted 7 July 2004
D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112, pp. 340 – 345