Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Companies and corporate activities are often portrayed as major causes of health
problems, and this is for good reasons. The detrimental impact of the sale of tobacco
products and alcoholic beverages on health is obvious, and nowadays the food sector is also
criticized for contributing to disease and ill health. Many food and beverage companies
produce market products that contain large amounts of salt, sugar, and fat, which are
important contributors to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other so-called lifestyle diseases.
At the same time, food companies are active in innovation and product development
that aim to create healthier products or variants (e.g., by removing trans fats or reducing
salt). Some also engage in social programs that encourage people to take up a healthy and
active lifestyle. Nevertheless, such activities may well cause scepticism because in a
competitive market context, the ultimate motivation of companies seems to be to make a
profit, even at the expense of consumer health. Although there is a clear recognition in the
public health debate that food and beverage multinationals play a crucial role in
determining what a large part of the global population eats and drinks, corporate actors are
frequently considered to be part of the problem rather than part of the solution. Arguably,
multinational food and beverage companies have been a driving force in the increase in the
global consumption of processed foods that contain large amounts of salt, sugar, and fat, as
well as in the growing consumption of soft drinks and other sweetened beverages. The
industry is now being scrutinized in relation to the products it produces, the way certain
products are being marketed, and the influence it has on political decision making regarding
national public health policies and international public health guidelines.
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions. Costs associated with obesity pose a
severe threat to the U.S. economy. Evidence indicates the foodservice industry has had a
major role contributing to the obesity crisis; thus, it is argued that the industry has an ethical
and social responsibility to now aggressively adopt socially responsible actions that will help
alleviate the increasing incidence of obesity. Such actions might include innovative
advertising initiatives, modification of portion sizes, and nutrition labelling, so that,
consumers can make healthy food selections. Even though such actions might result in
short-term profit losses, socially responsible actions have the potential to yield long-term
economic value for the food industry.
With regard to the products that are being produced, critics point to the development
of “hyperpalatable” food products, for instance. Hyperpalatable products are engineered to
have more rewarding properties, which is achieved by increasing the levels of sugar, salt,
fat, flavour, and so forth. These properties are present not only in fast-food products but
also in products such as soft drinks, candy, and cured meats that are put on the market by
multinational enterprises (MNEs) including Nestlé, Mondelēz, and PepsiCo. Food science
research has shown that these types of products can stimulate neural circuits similar to
those that are stimulated in cases of drug addiction. Although such products have only a
fraction of the addictive effects of recreational drugs, these findings have led some
researchers to cast doubt on the notion that all food-related health choices and their effects
are solely the result of autonomous individual choice and are therefore a personal
responsibility.
Food marketing practices aimed at children (e.g., character-branded products,
gamification of products, and free gifts, such as toys that come with a product) are criticized,
given that kids are unable to distinguish between truth and fiction in advertising and that
such advertisements stimulate them to eat high-calorie, low-nutrient food and beverage
products. Furthermore, increased attention is being given to how sugary drinks and fatty
foods are promoted at sporting events, music festivals, schools, etc. At some universities
and schools, there is increasing opposition to granting “pouring rights” to major beverage
companies that predominantly sell sugary drinks because this practice would eliminate the
possibility of opting for a healthier beverage choice.
Consumers spend about half of their food dollars on food away from home; thus, the
foodservice industry is clearly one of the major factors contributing to the current obesity
epidemic. Even though the foodservice industry has played a contributing role to the rising
obesity prevalence, not everyone agrees that the foodservice industry has responsibility
relative to alleviating the obesity epidemic.
Conclusion
The food industry has been one of the major factors contributing to the current obesity
epidemic. Although the notion of shared responsibility does not provide a clear-cut solution
to the role businesses should play in population health problems, it does show that the
possibility of corporate responsibility for health should not be neglected. Also, the
responsibilities of other actors (governments, nongovernmental organizations, consumers)
require further ethical reflection and debate. Connecting the debates on public health
ethics, CSR, health sciences, and business ethics opens up room to work toward a more
sophisticated and inclusive approach to responsibility for public health in the food industry.
While socially responsible actions in regard to these areas may seem to be a reversal of
profitable industry actions, it should be recognized that industry commitment to such
actions now may result in long-term profitability and enhanced market value for the firm in
the future. At the same time, addressing these complex health problems requires us to
rethink the responsibilities of citizens, societal organizations, and especially the food
industry itself.