Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 30

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF SRS TECH

SUBMITTED TO:

SIR WASEEM AHMED

SUBMITTED BY:

SABEEN JAVAID (2007-NUST-BIT-147)

SABA MANZOOR (2007-NUST-BIT-90)

RASHID ALI (2007-NUST-BIT-138)

RIZWAN ALI (2007-NUST-BIT-49)

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 1


TABLE OF CONTENT:

Executive Summary

Introduction

1- Market Analysis
1.1 Estimated size of Industry
1.2 Software and Services sector with 41% Growth
1.3 Employment of Professionals by 43% Growth

2- Industry at a Glance

3- Departments
3.1 Prospecting Projects

3.2 Launch of a New Software

4- Market

4.1 Market Segmentation

4.2 Market Analysis

4.3 SWOT Analysis

4.4 Competitive Edge

4.5 Main Objectives

5- Financial Analysis

5.1 Require Assets


5.2 Means of Financing
5.3 Expenses incurred at start of SRS Tech
5.4 Projected Balance Sheet
5.5 Projected Income Statement
• Net Profit Percentage
• Operating Capital
• NOPAT
• ROIC
Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 2
• Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
• Pay-Back Period
• Discounted Pay-Back Period
• Net Present Value
• Internal Rate of Return
• Time Value of Money
• Modified Internal Rate of Return

5.6 Ratio Analysis

•Liquidity Ratios
➢Current Ratio
➢Quick Ratio
➢Working Capital

•Profitability Ratios
➢Gross Profit Margin
➢Net Profit Margin

•Debt Management Ratio


➢Debt Ratio

6- References

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 3


Executive Summary:
SRS TECH is a start-up organization whose vision is to create the finest
education/entertainment software for non-reading individual with developmental
disabilities. The software product has been designed and created by IT specialists
with vast industrial experience and knowledge, to meet the needs of the targeted
customer segments. The software will be constructive by giving customization to the
product and will be according to client’s choice and requirements. SRS TECH will be
August 2010 as a Customer Oriented IT Platform. Idea founded and owned by
partners Ms. Sabeen, Ms. Saba, Mr. Rashid & Mr. Rizwan.

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 4


SRS TECH is a software house which is focusing on Pakistani projects specially
to participate in the development of Pakistan thus enhancing IT value and strength
in the country.

Mission Statement:
To give quality product to the active economy drivers of the market.

Vision:
Focusing on providing quality services to the target market which are playing
important role in country’s economy and progress i-e Business concerns,
manufacturing concerns, banks and educational institutes. Thus we promote
technology within these working concerns which results into their efficient
participation in Pakistan’s economy and progress.

1-Market Analysis:
The Pakistan IT industry today has an impressive story to tell. Much like the
successful startup that one would have not heard of a few years ago but now it is all
of a sudden the talk of the town The Pakistan’s IT industry has started to appear on
the radar of firms like Gartner and IDC and in the reports by AT Kearny and the
World Bank. It is a transformed industry growing exponentially and creating stir.

1.1Estimated Size of IT Industry

From its slow beginnings in the late 1980s, the industry has successfully arrived to a
point where its value proposition has been validated over and over again. The
largest members are grossing 15-25million dollars in revenues, and 100 million
dollar valuations. Most tech companies are growing in excess of 30% a year
annually. The industry as a whole is doing over 2 billion dollars a year in revenue, up
from less than a billion dollars a few years ago.

1.2 Software and Services sector with 41% Growth

For 2007-2008

About half of this growth is coming from foreign, software and high end services
projects. IBM, Cisco and Microsoft are expanding there in Pakistan operations
aggressively while several startups are now backed by VCs such as e-Planet
Ventures, Motorola, and adobe.

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 5


1.3 Employment of Professionals by 43% Growth

Sectors and countries have achieved in 15-20years, Pakistan’s technology scene is


poised to achieve this in less than a decade.

Putting it all together, now Pakistani Technology industry is very different from what
it was in the early 1990’s. From 4 founding companies in 1994, PASHA’s
membership exceeds 370. From 4,619full-time employees in 2004, current
employees are 12,232 and still rising day by day.

The number of QA (Quality assurance) professionals has doubled in the last 3 years
and 20% of those employed in the sector are foreign qualified. Fast becoming a hub
of high performance business, the questions that now arise are if this year’s growth
will be 28% or 50%, if there will be enough skilled HR to staff demand, if there will
be enough office space available in next year.

2- Industry at a Glance:

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 6


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 7
3- Departments:
Our main idea is to open a software house in Islamabad which would be the biggest
software house in Pakistan. We will have mainly two Departments.

Direct Projects:

Projects to create the set of standards and services that


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 8
With a policy framework enable us to develop simple,

Directed and easy to use software that are used for

Educational purposes and for meaningful exchange of

Technology skills between Techies and people having

Development disabilities.

Out Sourcing:

Outsourcing is an arrangement in which one company provides services for another


company that could also be or usually have been provided in-house. Outsourcing is a
trend that is becoming more common in information technology and other industries
for services that have usually been regarded as intrinsic to managing a business. In
some cases, the entire information management of a company is outsourced, including
planning and business analysis as well as the installation, management, and servicing
of the network and workstations. Outsourcing can range from the large contract in
which a company like IBM manages IT services for a company like Xerox to the practice
of hiring contractors and temporary office workers on an individual basis. So we will be
providing such kind of services to other institutions as well.

3.1 Prospecting Projects:

➢ Supporting firms
We will support various projects in collaboration with NADRA by using SQL, Oracle.
➢ Database for Institutions
We will be focusing on the projects and solutions for institutions like
Educational, Medical Business Growing Institutes.

3.2 Launch of a New Software:

➢ SRS Tech will launch new software and will introduce a new idea in the history
of Pakistan.
➢ Our software will help disable people. This idea has been taken from the
Research work of Dr. Sue. We were really impressed with his this kind of
thought so we decided to implement his idea.

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 9


4- Market:

4.1 Market Segmentation:


SRS Tech has identified four market segments for its product. They are the most
likely consumers of their product. These segments are as follows:

a. IT Intensive Corporate – The corporate and commercial businesses that are


focusing on IT software and are having an IT oriented environment like
banks, manufacturing concerns.
b. Centers of Independent living - They are typically non-profit organizations
that assist individuals with development disabilities. They help their clients
with transition skills, making them more independent. They also provide a
wide range of life skills training for the individuals.
c. Proactive Parents and Educational Concerns – Parents and educational
institutions (like district schools etc) that are really concern in the education
of their kids and students respectively. They will be looking for assistance
that can help them with the learning progress of their kids and student at
home and at educational places respectively.
d. Agencies - Internationally many countries have their agencies that act as
Brokers to connect the service Providers and that individual that are in need
of these services. Such agencies generally formed as a result of a settlement
or payout from a lawsuit (individual and class actions).

4.2 Market Analysis:

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 10


4.3 SWOT Analysis:
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business
venture. It involves specifying the objective of the business venture or project and
identifying the internal and external factors that are favorable and unfavorable to
achieve that objective. We briefly pointed out them as below:

➢ Strengths:
• Highly skilled and focused employees.
• Providing customizable software products.
• Satisfying the requirements of the targeted segments.
• Quality assurance of value added products.
• Giving a new flavor to the software development in Pakistan.

➢ Weaknesses:
• To gain the trust of the people.
• To get our software house to be renowned among the software techies.
• Lack of training in the employees at beginning.

➢ Opportunities:
• To provide a diversified range of products according to customers taste
and demands.
• To implement the knowledge hidden inside “the untapped stockrooms
of our minds” – G.R.Harrison.
• Ensure Individual Integrity.
• Enhance Personal Professional Competence
➢ Threats:
• Terrorists attacks.
• Influence of Economy Impairment.
• Prevailing trends of Globalization.
• Global Economic Crisis.
• Rationalism

4.4 Competitive Edge:

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 11


As there are several companies present in the market and are providing similar
product for educational purposes SRS Tech will Leverage its competitive edge by
including Entertainment factor in our software products. By doing so users will
spend more time on using our product as it creates a mean of interest while using
software.

4.5 Main Objectives:


➢ We will follow the strategy of Market Penetration in the first year. Then we will
focus on how to increase our sales up to double or triple of current sales in the
next 2-3 years.
➢ To assist more than 15000 individuals with development disabilities by the end
of 5th year at max.
➢ Achieve up to 20-25% market penetration by the end of 4th year.

Projected sales, gross profit margin and profit for next three years are shown
below:

5- Financial Analysis:

Note: All figures are in (000) Rs

5.1 Require Assets:


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 12
Assets

Cash 610

A/C Receivables 500

Inventory 190

Prepaid Rent 600

Bill Boards 100

Total Current Assets 2100

Furniture 755

Fixture 345

Computers 500

Equipment 450

Total Fixed assets 2050

Total Assets 4100

5.2 Means of Financing:

Owner’s Equity:

Partner’s Names Equity in Rupees

Ms. Sabeen Javaid 720

Ms. Saba Manzoor 720

Mr. Rashid Ali 720

Mr. Rizwan Ali 720

Liabilities:
➢ Loan from Bank : 460
➢ Long-term loans : 760

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 13


Owner’s equity + Liabilities = Assets
(720 × 4) + (460 + 760) = 4100
4100 = 4100
Therefore Accounting Equation is satisfied.

5.3 Expenses incurred at start of SRS Tech:

Expenses heads Amount in Rs

Legal formalities 100

license 200

Marketing Campaign 300

furniture 700

Fixtures 350

Computers 2500
• Laptops
• SRS’s Main Server
• Network establishment
• H/w & S/w

Equipment 500
• Generator
• Photocopy Machine
• Others like telephone
connections etc.

R & D Fund 2000

Advance Rents 500

Other expenses 240

Total startup expense 7390

Cash in hand required 610

Total 8000

5.4 Projected Balance Sheet:

Projected Balance Sheet

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 14


ASSETS

Current Assets

Year 2010 Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013

Cash 610 710 850 1000

Inventory 500 550 500 550

A/C Recv 190 165 200 250

Prepaid Rent 600 675 650 600

Bill Boards 200 200 250 200

Total Current Assets


2100 2300 2450 2600

Fixed Assets

Furniture 755 755 855 855

Fixture 345 345 345 345

Computers 500 500 600 650

Equipment 450 450 500 550

Less: Accumulated (100) (100) (100) (100)


Depreciation

Total Fixed assets 2050 2050 2200 2300

Total Assets 4100 4350 4650 4900

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

Year 2010 Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013

Liabilities

A/C Payable 250 330 300 250

Accrued Expenses 120 290 260 220

Current Borrowing 250 300 400 550

Total Current 620 920 960 1020


liabilities

long term 600 550 810 1000


liabilities

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 15


Total Liabilities 1220 1470 1770 2020

Capital Stock

Ms. Sabeen Javaid 720 720 720 720

Ms. Saba Manzoor 720 720 720 720

Mr. Rashid Ali 720 720 720 720

Mr. Rizwan Ali 720 720 720 720

Total Capital 2880 2880 2880 2880

Total Liabilities & 4100 4350 4650 4900


Capital Stock

NOTE: We have ignored retain earnings and dividends.

5.5 Projected Income Statement:

INCOME STATEMENT

Year 2010 Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013

Revenue:

Sales Revenues 1500 2000 2600 3700

Service Revenue 700 1000 1200 1300

Total Revenue 2200 3000 3800 5000

Expenses:
Salaries Expense 300 300 300 400

Commissions 20 20 30 20

Office Supplies 90 90 70 80

Legal Fees 70 70 100 70

Advertisement 200 250 200 200

Interest 50.6 50.6 100 100

R&D 50 70 150 100

Other expenses 820 750 1000 1200

Total Expenses: 1600.6 1600.6 1950 2170

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 16


Profit or Net Income
599.4 1399.4 1850 2830
Before Income tax

Less Income Tax 59.94 139.94 185 283


10%

Profit or Net- 539.46 1259.46 1665 2547


Income after Tax

Add: Depreciation100 100 100 100

Net Cash flow 639.46 1359.46 1765 2647

• Net Profit Percentage:


All companies must consume resources (i.e. incur costs) in order to generate
revenue. The Net Income Percentage is simply a measure of management’s
ability to control these costs.

Net Profit Percentage = (Net Income / Total Revenue) * 100

For Year 2010:


Net Profit Percentage = (Net Income / Total Revenue) * 100
= (539.46/2200)*100
= 24.52 %
Thus the company will be able to convert 24.52 % of its revenue into net income.

For year 2011:


Net Profit Percentage = (Net Income / Total Revenue) * 100
= (1259.46/3000)*100
= 41.982 %
Thus the company will be able to convert 41.982 % of its revenue into net income.

For year 2012:


Net Profit Percentage = (Net Income / Total Revenue) * 100
= (1665/3800)*100
= 43.82 %
Thus the company will be able to convert 43.82 % of its revenue into net income.

For year 2012:


Net Profit Percentage = (Net Income / Total Revenue) * 100
= (2547/5000)*100

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 17


= 50.94 %
Thus the company will be able to convert 50.94 % of its revenue into net income.

Here trend of net profit percentage is shown graphically. That is pretty good,
improving every year.

• Operating Capital:

Total Operating Capital = NOWC + Operating long term assets


= (Cash + A/R +Inventories-(A/P + Accruals))
+Operating long term assets

For year 2010:


Total Operating Capital = (Cash + A/R +Inventories-(A/P + Accruals)) +Operating
long term assets
= 610 + 500 + 190 – 250 – 120 + 2050
= 2980

For year 2011:


Total Operating Capital = (Cash + A/R +Inventories-(A/P + Accruals)) +Operating
long term assets
= 710 + 550 + 165 – 330 – 290 +2050
= 2855

For year 2012:


Total Operating Capital = (Cash + A/R +Inventories-(A/P + Accruals)) +Operating
long term assets
= 850 + 500 +200 – 300 -260 + 2200
= 3190

For year 2013:


Total Operating Capital = (Cash + A/R +Inventories-(A/P + Accruals)) +Operating
long term assets
= 1000 + 550 + 250 – 250 – 220 + 2300
= 3630

Here trend of Operating Capital is shown graphically. That is quite positive.


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 18
• NOPAT:
NOPAT = EBIT (1 - T)
Assuming, T = 10%

For year 2010:


NOPAT = EBIT (1 - T)
= 599.4 (1- 0.10)
=539.46

For year 2011:


NOPAT = EBIT (1 - T)
= 1399.4 (1- 0.10)
=1259.46

For year 2012:


NOPAT = EBIT (1 - T)
= 1850 (1- 0.10)
= 1665

For year 2013:


NOPAT = EBIT (1 - T)
= 2830 (1- 0.10)
= 2547

Here trend of net profit percentage is shown graphically.

• ROIC:
ROIC= [NOPAT/ Operating Capital]*100
Assuming WACC = 10 %
If ROIC > WACC, this means company is adding value & will have positive EVA.

For year 2010:


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 19
ROIC= [NOPAT/ Operating Capital]*100
= [539.46/2980]*100
=18.1 %
Since ROIC > WACC, this means company is adding value & will have
positive EVA.

For year 2011:


ROIC= [NOPAT/ Operating Capital]*100
= [1259.46/2855]*100
= 44.11 %
Since ROIC > WACC, this means company is adding value & will have
positive EVA.

For year 2012:


ROIC= [NOPAT/ Operating Capital]*100
= [1665/3190]*100
= 52.19 %
Since ROIC > WACC, this means company is adding value & will have
positive EVA.

For year 2013:


ROIC= [NOPAT/ Operating Capital]*100
= [2547/3630]*100
= 70.16 %
Since ROIC > WACC, this means company is adding value & will have
positive EVA.

• Accounting Rate of Return (ARR):

ARR

Years Cash Flow Depreciation Profit

0 (4100) 0 0

1 639.46 100 539.46

2 1359.46 100 1259.46

3 1765 100 1665

4 2647 100 2547

Average Profit for 4 years 1502.73


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 20
Average Investment (4100+0)/2=2050

ARR (1502.73/2050)*100 =73.3%

• Pay-Back Period:

Pay-Back Period

Year Cash-Flow

0 (4100)

1 639.46 3460.54

2 1359.46 2101.08

3 1765 336.08

4 2647

Payback Period= 3years and ((336.08/2647)*12) months

= 3years and 1month and (0.52*30)days

= 3years and 1month and 16 days

• Discounted Pay-Back Period:

Assuming WACC=10%

Present Value of Cash-Flow = FV (1/(1+.10)n)

Present Value Factor= 1/(1+.10)n , n=0,1,2,3,4.

Discounted Pay-Back Period

Year FV of Cash FlowPV Factor PV of Cash-Flow

0 (4100) 1

1 639.46 0.909 581.27 3518.54

2 1359.46 0.826 1122.91 2395.63

3 1765 0.751 1325.5 1070.13

4 2647 0.683 1807.9

Discounted Payback Period= 3years and ((1070.13/1807.9)*12) months


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 21
= 3years and (0.59*30)days

= 3years and 18 days

• Net Present Value:

Net Present Value

Year FV of Cash FlowPV Factor PV of Cash-Flow

0 (4100) 1 (4100)

1 639.46 0.909 581.27

2 1359.46 0.826 1122.91

3 1765 0.751 1325.5

4 2647 0.683 1807.9

NPV = Inflow - Outflow = 737.58

NPV is positive so we will accept this project

• Internal Rate of Return (IRR):

Internal Rate Of Return

Year FV of Cash FlowPV Factor (10%)PV of Cash-FlowPV Factor (20%)

0 (4100) 1 - 4100 1 (4100)

1 639.46 0.909 581.27 0.833 532.67

2 1359.46 0.826 1122.91 0.6944 944

3 1765 0.751 1325.5 0.578 1020.17

4 2647 0.683 1807.9 0.4822 1276.38

NPV = Inflow - Outflow 737.58 -326.78

This means IRR is between 10% & 20% so now we will use interpolation
technique.
Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 22
IRR= 10% + [(737.58/(737.58-(-326.78)))*(20-10)]

IRR= 16.93 %

• Time Value of Money:

Assuming: Interest rate =10%

Present Value

Present Value of Cash-Flow = FV (1/ (1+.10) n )

Present Value Factor= 1/ (1+.10)n , n=0, 1, 2, 3, 4.

Present Value

Year FV of Cash FlowPV Factor PV of Cash-Flow

0 (4100) 1

1 639.46 0.909 581.27

2 1359.46 0.826 1122.91

3 1765 0.751 1325.5

4 2647 0.683 1807.9

PV of future inflows = 4837.58

Future Value

Future Value of Cash-Flow = PV *(1+.10) n

Where n=0, 1, 2, 3, 4.

Future Value

Year PV of Cash FlowFV Factor FV of Cash-Flow

0 (4100)

1 639.46 1.331 851.121

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 23


2 1359.46 1.21 1644.95

3 1765 1.10 1941.5

4 2647 1 2647

FV of inflows = 7084.57

• Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR):

We select this project if its MIRR is greater than WACC because greater the
MIRR than WACC, greater will be the security margin.

Future Value

Year PV of Cash FlowFV Factor FV of Cash-Flow

0 (4100)

1 639.46 1.331 851.121

2 1359.46 1.21 1644.95

3 1765 1.10 1941.5

4 2647 1 2647

FV of inflows = 7084.57

Now we will find that discount rate on terminal value (i.e. 7084.57) for
which our answer equals the outflow.

Find i=?

Future Value of Cash-Flow = PV *(1+.10) n

n=0, 1, 2, 3, 4.

7084.57=4100(1+i) 4

MIRR = i = 14.65 %

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 24


5.6 Ratio Analysis:

1. Liquidity Ratios:
Liquidity measures a company's capacity to pay its debts as they come
due. There are three ratios for evaluating liquidity.

a. Current Ratio:
The current ratio gauges how capable a business is in paying current
liabilities by using current assets only.
Current Ratio = CA / CL
Ideally it should be 2:1

For year 2010:


Current Ratio = CA / CL
= 2100 / 620
= 3.38 times
For year 2011:
Current Ratio = CA / CL
= 2300/ 920
= 2.5 times
For year 2012:
Current Ratio = CA / CL
= 2450 / 960
= 2.55 times
For year 2013:
Current Ratio = CA / CL
= 2600 / 1020
= 2.54 times
Here we have shown the trend of Current Ratio graphically:

b. Quick Ratio:
It indicates the extent to which you could pay current liabilities without
relying on the sale of inventory.
Quick Ratio = Quick Assets / CL
= (CA – Inventory – Prepayments) / CL
Ideally it should be > 1.

For year 2010:


Quick Ratio = (CA – Inventory – Prepayments) / CL
= (2100-500-600) / 620
Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 25
= 1.61 times
For year 2011:
Quick Ratio = (CA – Inventory – Prepayments) / CL
= (2300 – 550 - 675) / 920
= 1.19 times

For year 2012:


Quick Ratio = (CA – Inventory – Prepayments) / CL
= (2450 – 500 – 650) / 960
= 1.35 times

For year 2013:


Quick Ratio = (CA – Inventory – Prepayments) / CL
= (2600 – 550 – 600) / 1020
= 1.42 times

Trend of quick ratio is shown below:

c. Working Capital:
Working capital = CA – CL
It should be positive.

For year 2010:


Working capital = CA – CL
= 2100 – 620
=1480

For year 2011:


Working capital = CA – CL
=2300 – 920
=1380

For year 2012:


Working capital = CA – CL
= 2450 – 960
= 1490
Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 26
For year 2013:
Working capital = CA – CL
= 2600 – 1020
=1580

Trend of working capital is as follows:

1. Profitability Ratios:
Profitability ratios measure the company's ability to generate a return on
its resources.

a. Gross Profit Margin


Gross profit margin indicates how well the company can generate a
return at the gross profit level. It addresses three areas -- inventory
control, pricing and production efficiency.

Gross Profit Margin = Gross Profit / Total Sales


= (Sales – Cost of Goods Sold) / Total Sales

Assuming: Cost of Goods Sold to be as follows:

For year 2010, cost of goods sold is = 800


For year 2010, cost of goods sold is = 1200
For year 2010, cost of goods sold is = 1500
For year 2010, cost of goods sold is = 2000

For year 2010:


Gross Profit Margin= (Sales – Cost of Goods Sales) / Total Sales
= (1500 - 800)/ 1500
= 0.46
For year 2011:
Gross Profit Margin= (Sales – Cost of Goods Sales) / Total Sales
= (2000 - 1200)/2000
= 0.40
For year 2012:
Gross Profit Margin= (Sales – Cost of Goods Sales) / Total Sales
= (2600 - 1500) / 2600
Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 27
= 0.42
For year 2013:
Gross Profit Margin= (Sales – Cost of Goods Sales) / Total Sales
= (3700 - 2000) / 3700
= 0.45
Trend of GPM is shown below:

b. Net Profit Margin


Net profit margin shows how much net profit is derived from every
dollar of total sales. It indicates how well the business has managed
its operating expenses.

Net Profit Margin =Net Profit / Total Sales

For year 2010:


Net Profit Margin =Net Profit / Total Sales
= 539.46 / 1500
= 0.37

For year 2011:


Net Profit Margin =Net Profit / Total Sales
= 1259.46 / 2000
= 0.62

For year 2012:


Net Profit Margin =Net Profit / Total Sales
= 1665 / 2600
= 0.64

For year 2013:


Net Profit Margin =Net Profit / Total Sales
= 2547 / 3700
= 0.68
It is graphically shown below:

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 28


1. Debt Management Ratio:
This is an indication of the company's ability to satisfy its debt obligations
and its capacity to take on additional debt without impairing its survival.

a. Debt Ratio:
A ratio that indicates what proportion of debt a company has relative
to its assets.

Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets

For year 2010:


Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
= 1220 / 4100
= 0.29
For year 2011:
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
=1470 / 4350
= 0.34
For year 2012:
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets
= 1770 / 4650
=0.38
For year 2013:
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Asset s
= 2020/ 4900
= 0.41
Trend of debt ratio is shown below:

6- References

 www.wikipedia.com
 www.pasha.org.pk
 www.scribed.com
 http://womeninbusiness.about.com/od/freebusinesscour
ses/a/finfeasibility_2.htm
 www.whatis.com
 IT professional’s reviews from www.Google.com

Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 29


Feasibility Report for SRS Tech Page 30

Вам также может понравиться