Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Drilling fluids introduced in 1887 and used in the period 1887–1901 Figure 1: Measured Membrane Efficiency of Several Mud Systems
were basic mixtures of clays and water that had no impact on the 80
surrounding environment. However, they have now become a 60
complex mixture of fluids, suspended or dissolved solids, polymers 40
and chemicals, and thus require an engineered design approach to 20
fulfil their technical performance without having any impact on the 0
Silicate mud Mud A Mud B Mud C
surrounding environment, ecosystems and habitats, as well as to Types of mud
ensure the occupational health and safety (OHS) of drilling-fluid Figure 2: Comparison of the Rheological Behaviour of Mineral- and
testing and handling staff. Environmental problems associated with Vegetable-oil-based Muds
complex drilling fluids in general, and oil-based mud (OBM) in 400
particular, are among the major concerns of world communities. For
Dial reading 300
this reason, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other
regulatory bodies are imposing increasingly stringent regulations to 200
0
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the EPA and other regulatory 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Rotational speed (rpm)
bodies imposed environmental laws and regulations affecting all
VOM RYOM VOM+GSP
aspects of petroleum-related operations from exploration, MOM VOM+TP
production and refining to distribution.2 In particular, there has been
Figure 3: Comparison of the Rheological Behaviour of Mineral- and
increasing pressure on exploration companies to find Plant-oil-based Muds
environmentally acceptable alternatives to OBMs. This has been 400
reflected in the introduction of new legislation by government
300
agencies in almost every part of the world – including the US, the
Dial reading
0
Nearly three-quarters of the Earth is ocean, which provides huge
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
potential for hydrocarbon resources in addition to other valuable Rotational speed (rpm)
PLOM – BP PLOM – AP MOM
marine resources. According to Liesman, 4 reserves at depths
approaching a mile or more now represent the biggest single new the overall environmental impact of water-based muds (WBMs) is
oil resources for world communities. For this reason, industry minimal, due to the detrimental effect of some mud additives such
attention is focused on the vast offshore areas. This is reflected in as potassium chloride, potassium sulphate, polyamine, etc., drilling
increasing drilling activities in the marine environment.1 Even though and operating companies have been forced to review their mud
additive selection guidelines to exclude or control the use of non-
environmentally friendly and low-toxic mud additives in the
Mohammed Amanullah is a Principal Research Scientist at
the Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organisation formulation of WBMs.
(CSIRO) Petroleum in Australia. Prior to joining CSIRO, he
worked as a technical specialist (drilling fluid) in Nigeria
Some of the WBM additives that were acceptable from an
with Interdril Nigeria Ltd, having previously worked at
Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation as an environmental point of view decades ago are not acceptable for
Assistant Engineer. His major areas of research are novel current and future drilling operations in environmentally sensitive
techniques and product development, shale-drilling mud
interactions, borehole instability, water- and oil- (synthetic areas. For this reason, the industry is dedicated to replacing some of
and plant/vegetable) based mud design, mudcake characterisation, membrane efficiency the low-toxic, less harmful and less pure WBM additives that may
measurement, mud- and production-related formation damage, water cut problems, water
not be tolerable in future due to the introduction of increasingly
management and environmentally friendly product development for oil field and other
industrial applications. He is the lead inventor of vegetable-oil-based dielectric fluid, has strict environmental legislation to protect the global environment.
published more than 60 papers and reports and also prepared the drilling fluid manual for Moreover, some of the WBM additives that are considered
Interdril Nigeria Ltd. In 2005 he was one of the recipients of the Green Chemistry
Challenge Awards, awarded by the Royal Australian Chemical Institute. He completed his
environmentally friendly on the basis of the evaluation of short-term
PhD in petroleum engineering at Imperial College, London in 1993, having obtained an exposure effect may not be acceptable if they show long-
MSc with first-class honours in mechanical engineering, with specialisation in oil and gas
term exposure effect. This may lead to changes in WBM and mud
field equipment, from Moscow Oil and Gas Institute in 1983.
additives selection and disposal guidelines all over the world.
This paper provides a brief description of the muds and Figure 4: Comparison of the Fluid-loss Characteristics of Mineral- and
mud additives that were developed to meet the current and Vegetable-oil-based Muds
(cc)
20
10
High Membrane Efficiency Water-based Mud
OBM eliminates reactive shale and mudrock problems through the 0
VOM RVOM VOM+GSP MOM
formation of membrane at the borehole wall, which allows the Mud types
Spurt loss – BHR Spurt loss – AHR
removal of water from the shale formation. This concept was used API fluid loss – BHR API fluid loss – AHR
to develop several high-membrane-generating WBMs jointly with
Figure 5: Fluid-loss Characteristics of Plant-oil-based Muds in the
Halliburton Baroid. A novel test facility was built for accurate Presence of Different Fluid-loss Additives
assessment of the membrane-generating efficiency of different
40
(cc)
frequently used silicate-based mud. The data show that two of the 20
newly developed WBMs have higher membrane efficiency compared 10
with the widely used silicate-based mud, and thus are expected
0
Duratone Barablock Baranex Polyac CMC LV1
significantly to reduce mud-related borehole instability problems.
Fluid loss additive
Spurt loss API fluid loss
Vegetable- and Plant-oil-based Muds
Due to the poor environmental standing and biodegradation 2 and 3 show the rheological behaviour of the newly developed
characteristics of conventional oil-based muds, the Commonwealth vegetable- and plant-oil-based muds. The American Petroleum
Scientific and Research Organisation (CSIRO) conducted dedicated Industry (API) filtration test, however, indicates much higher API fluid-
research to develop plant- and vegetable-oil-based muds to replace loss properties (see Figures 4 and 5) for both the vegetable- and the
the toxic OBMs. Innovative processing and additive techniques led to plant-oil-based muds compared with mineral OBM. This problem can
the successful formulation of plant- and vegetable-oil-based muds easily be fixed by identifying or developing an appropriate fluid-loss
with rheological characteristics similar to conventional OBMs. Figures additive that is effective in vegetable- and plant-oil-based muds.
Figure 6: Comparison of the Dynamic Fluid-loss Behaviour of Novel thermo-mechanical gelatinisation with a twin screw extruder. The
Fluid-loss Additives with Respect to a Widely Used Modified Starch process produces no waste by-product, as no solvent is used in the
manufacturing process. Figures 7 and 8 show the static and dynamic
20
Dynamic fluid loss (cc)
Positive values indicate increase less than 10% bentonite, are environmentally friendly muds that have
change (%)
1. Amanullah M, Yu L, Environment friendly fluid loss additives Texas, 7–10 March 1993, SPE 25989, 453–63. 7. Amanullah M, Yu L, Dynamic and static fluid loss properties
to protect the marine environment from the detrimental effect 4. Liesman S, Big oil starts to tap vast reserves buried far below of novel starches prepared using reactive extrusion technique,
of mud additives, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, the waves, Wall Street Journal, 3 July 2000. Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, 18–20
2005;48(3–4):199–208. 5. Amanullah M, Physio-chemical characterisation of vegetable oils October 2004, Perth, Australia.
2. Amanullah M, Shale-drilling mud interactions, PhD thesis, and preliminary test results of vegetable oil-based muds. 8. Amanullah M, Boyle R, An environment friendly and
University of London, 1993;275. SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and economically attractive thermal degradation inhibitor for
3. Reid PI, Elliot GP, Milton RC, Burt DA, Reduced Exhibition, 12–14 September 2005, Dubai, UAE, SPE-97008-PP. bentonite mud, SPE Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition,
environmental impact and improved drilling performance with 6. Amanullah M, Tan CP, Camilleri M, Rheological and filtration Vienna, Austria, 12–15 June 2006, SPE-99410.
water-based muds containing glycols. SPE/EPA Exploration properties of novel plant-oil-based invert emulsion muds,
and Production Environmental Conference, San Antonio, CSIRO Confidential Report No. 00-025, 2000.
The Energy Institute (EI) is the leading professional body for the energy industry, with over 13,000 individuals and 300 companies in membership
across 100 countries. At the heart of the EI lies its scientific and technical programme. Each year, the EI undertakes a focused technical work
programme comprising original independent research and investigations, technical responses to legislation and regulation and workshops and
seminars, providing the international energy industry with information and guidance on relevant technical matters related to health, safety,
environment, aviation, distribution and marketing, test methods and hydrocarbon management. It is supported by BP, Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron,
ConocoPhillips, Maersk Oil, Talisman, ENI, Kuwait Aviation International, Total, Statoil, Murco, BG Group, Nexen, BHP Billiton and Saudi Aramco.
The EI technical programme covers the development of good practice guidance in support of offshore safety and integrity, which has of late
included work on high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) drilling. In response to developments in exploration and production, the EI is revising
the Institute of Petroleum (IP) Model Code of Safe Practice, Part 17: well control during the drilling and testing of high-pressure offshore wells.
This Code was developed for the safe practice for those concerned with well control during the drilling and testing of high-pressure offshore wells,
providing information and guidance on those well control activities associated with high-pressure wells that have an impact on safety offshore.
The Code is intended to be used in the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) context, but the principles and recommendations have general relevance to
similar operations elsewhere. Each chapter covers an important aspect of well control and has an introduction that describes the part each activity
plays in the drilling and testing of high-pressure offshore wells. In 2006, the EI’s technical partners agreed to support these revisions and the EI is
working with consultants Think Well to provide the expertise needed. This work is being directed by a cross-industry steering group drawn from
the EI’s Aberdeen HPHT forum, and includes the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). The group is chaired by Bruce McEwan of Shell, with the EI
providing management and secretarial functions. To find out more, please visit www.energyinst.org.uk ■