Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/273425266

Tradition and Transformation: The Structure of Malay Woodcarving Motifs in


Craft Education

Article  in  Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · October 2013


DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.157

CITATIONS READS

5 475

4 authors, including:

Sumardianshah Silah Badrul Isa


Universiti Teknologi MARA Universiti Teknologi MARA
9 PUBLICATIONS   5 CITATIONS    23 PUBLICATIONS   32 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Raiha SHAHANAZ Redzuan


Universiti Teknologi MARA
9 PUBLICATIONS   5 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Research Project View project

M.A Thesis View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Badrul Isa on 16 February 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831

6thInternational Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012)

Tradition and transformation: the structure of Malay woodcarving


motifs in craft education
Sumardianshah Silaha*, Ruzaika Omar Basareeb, Badrul Isaa, Raiha Shahanaz Redzuana
a
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40200, Malaysia
b
Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia

Abstract

Malay traditional woodcarving is one of the Malays’ most intricate and amazing heritages. It is also a symbol, representing our
beloved Malay arts, and thus acts as an identifier to our country. The legacy of woodcarving inheritance is passed through many
generations until today- therefore, it is only logic to preserve and uphold such traditions. An aim to study the structure of
Terengganu Malay traditional woodcarving motif based on interpretations of Malay Aesthetic principles and elements is being
applied to new motifs design to contemporary artwork, namely, painting and installation art. The artist’s statement is related to a
master carver to create the new motif design with interpreting Malay aesthetic principles and elements in their work. Based on
collective information, it can be said that the structure of Terengganu Malay traditional woodcarving motif is determined by
three steps of structural motif. The findings of these three steps to structure motif are vital in understanding the intricate artworks
of woodcarving motifs. It should be used as guidelines by those who are related in the artwork field such as artists creating new
designs, thus giving meaning and depth to overall work, without sacrificing the unique Malay aesthetics and identity. The topic
of creating motifs and patterns according to culture, tradition and heritage should also be introduced in the syllabus of Visual Art
Education (Craft Education Topic) in secondary schools and also in the Department of Art and Design Education, Faculty of
Education, UiTM.

©2012
© TheAuthors.
2013 The Authors. Published
Published by Elsevier
by Elsevier Ltd. access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Ltd. Open
Selectionand/or
Selection and/or peer-review
peer-review under
under responsibility
responsibility of the Faculty
of the Faculty of Education,
of Education, UniversityUniversiti
TechnologyTeknolog
k
MARA, i MARA, Malaysia.
Malaysia.

Keywords: The motif structure, woodcarving, craft education;

1. Introduction

The art of Terengganu woodcarving is known as Malay traditional skills for generations. Previously, the
woodcarving activities were done during the time after the fishermen and farmers had effectively finished their
catches and harvesting during the monsoon season. During the rainy seasons, the Terengganu Malays took

* Sumardianshah Silah. Tel: +6-017-978-1914; fax: +6-03-5522-7412


E-mail address: sumard02@salam.uitm.edu.my

1877-0428 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Faculty of Education, University Technology MARA, Malaysia.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.157
824 Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831

advantage of the monsoon period to create woodcarvings as their side income. But now, the art of woodcarving
has become more commercialized in practice. Some Terengganu’s wood carvers have succeeded in introducing
their most artistic woodcarving to be used in the government buildings. Nowadays, the woodcarving activities are
no longer very popular. Woodcarvings have been a side income career for some craftsmen in Kelantan,
Terengganu and Pahang. Woodcarving has always being connected with the production of furniture, the main
gate, houses, women accessories and the construction of the sampan. However, now, same woodcarvings found
in furniture, houses and buildings are carved by woodcarver artisan who came from outside of Malaysia. The
development of this industry has been developed by all carvers from Malaysia and neighbouring countries.

2. Background of Study

This study is a visual research about the Terengganu woodcarving motif. In this study, the art of Terengganu
woodcarving are looked from two different aspects which are the structural aspect and the motif aspect. The
Advance Learner’s English - Malay Dictionary (2003) stated that the ‘Structure’ means the way in which something
is put together, organized, and built or how one part is related to another. It also means anything made of many part
or any complex whole. This research studies the structure in the Malay traditional woodcarving motifs and how the
elements are organized or arranged to form a whole motif. In traditional woodcarving, the motifs which are part of
a decoration, carved in two dimensions or three dimensions, are then arranged to create the decorative design or
pattern. (Muhammad AfandiYahya, 1995, p.108) Understanding the structure will benefit the artisan tremendously
in motif designs through an arrangement of some or whole elements in a pattern.
Siti Zainon (1986), defined three basic developments in order to create the Malay traditional motifs.
Arrangement of visual elements and motifs create a whole form and this is also known as pattern or design in the
Malay traditional crafts. Development of the motif form begins with the basic visual elements such as dotted
elements, lines and colour. (p. 12-15). She has also defined three basic phases of motif development which begins
with dotted elements and lines, the form of the motif and the last phase is the arrangement of the motif. In the first
phase, the dotted element will develop various lines such as horizontal, vertical, meander, intersection, spiral and
others. The second phase of the development defines the carving of the continuous long lines, meander lines or
curve lines and edging lines to create some forms. Most of the basic motif forms which are used in the traditional
Malay craft are circle, square, diamond, hexagonal, and the triangle which is also known as the bamboo shoot and
others. The third phase is a combination of the same motif in one situation to create a pattern. Diversities enhance
the appearance of patterns through positive and negative side. In the third phase, Siti Zainon Ismail (1986) has also
defined seven general patterns used as a decoration. They are the horizontal pattern, vertical pattern, slanting
pattern, chess pattern, square lattice pattern, diamond pattern and triangle pattern. This research study has analyzed
the implementation of Siti Zainon’s theory (1986) on the three basic developments of motifs in determining the
structure in the Malay traditional woodcarving motifs.

3. Literature Review

Today, many young designers, artists, and architects cover up the weaknesses of the motif design according to
their own standard without considering the aesthetical elements that should be included in designing motifs. The
placement angle, structure, and the development of idea of the motifs are usually being ignored. The action of
ignoring the motifs design that should have their own meaning, creativity, and aesthetical norms, can be considered
as disrespect towards the previous woodcarvers and also their intellectual knowledge. Today, many of us tend to
copy the motifs without understanding the beauty of the traditional woodcarving motifs. If this continues, there
might not be any more real woodcarving motifs in the future that contain the real aesthetical value of Malay
traditional woodcarving style. Therefore, it is vital for us to study deeply and in detail about the content of the
motifs structures before creating a new motif inspired by woodcarving activity. According to Mohamad Tajuddin
(2005), modernization is the main issue that caused the problems in producing the Malay woodcarving motifs. The
Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831 825

question is - how do we study the structures within the woodcarving motifs according to interpretation of elements
and the aesthetic elements in the Malay cultures today?

4. Research Methodology

This study used the qualitative method by using the historical research method and studio practice or artistic
research method. These methods allow data to be collected from various sources. Qualitative research includes
multiple ways in deciphering and also in using naturalistic approach in answering the research questions (G. Lodico,
T. Spauldingdan H. Voegtle: 2006). The historical research method used three different approaches in collecting the
data. One of the approaches was the informal interview with Wan Po, a renowned traditional wood carver.
Documents and data were analysed using three methods which are (1) informal interview with Wan Po, a
woodcarver, analysis of documents which included magazines, brochures, galleries and photo documentation from
visits to art carving galleries in Museums and Art Galleries, video presentations as well as woodcarving exhibitions
at Wan Po’s Gallery. (2) The second method used involved is studio-practiced research whereby the researcher used
visual analysis to collect data through sketch documentations, drawings thumbnail sketches, Pre-comprehensive
sketches, Comprehensive, full-scale drawings and final pieces created via the conventional art medium or new art
mediums such as Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator. (3) Data were also collected from studies done from studying the
pieces done by visual artist by looking at the contents and the meanings behind the pieces produced by the artists.
One of the uniqueness and strengths in practicing studio-practiced research lies upon the researcher and the ability
to manipulate visuals (Eisner, 1981; C. Marshall & Rossman, 1999; J. Marshall, 2007). Other than that, grounded
theory was applied in collecting and analysing primary and secondary data. The theory will combine a collection of
history and background information according to a systematic and arranged manner as proposed by Edward Burke
Feldman and J. J. Winckelmann.

Grounded Theory

J. J. Winckelmann Edmund Feldman


826 Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831

Tradition & Transformation: The Design Structure of Terengganu Malay


Woodcarving Motifs in Crafts Education

Ideal Image

From
J. J. Winckelmann (1764)

START 1 2 3

Collecting all from any Categorize the data into Arrange the data and USING THE DATA –
type of resources group start to do analysis – new based on finding; choose
possibilities the data for make a
structure & producing an
artwork

Edmund Feldman (1924) – 5


Theory Art History / Art Criticism

TO DESCRIBE TO ANALYZE TO INTERPRET TO EVALUATE /


author, title, year, discuss the citation based on analyze that JUDGEMENT
publisher, place, URL, chronologically, data, interpret the data An evaluation the data
ISBN, article year, etc. comparatively, facts into the new form or new and select the exact data
against facts, opinion possibilities. for well-done arranging
reason, cause effect. for further use.

Fig.1. (a) Step 1: Grounded Theory; (b) Step 1: Theoretical Framework


Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831 827

5. Finding

5.1. Step 1: Basic Form - Basic Structure from Circle, Square or Polygon

Before drafting, the two basic structures refer to as the basic frame for plotting the motif (circle and polygon
shape). According to Siti Zainon’s theory (1986), the first and second phase of the motif creation in the Malay
traditional craft uses the circle and polygon shapes as a basic frame. The circle is usually the basic shape while
others such as the square, hexagon, triangle and polygon can be used as well. All the basic shapes are also used as
frames, serving as the border or boundary in constructing the motif structure. Selection of a shape as the basic
structure depends on the final function either as a decoration or placement. Abdullah Mohamed or Nakula’s
concept (1978), about God and Universe has stated that the circle is the essence of Allah. The circle, based on the
moon shape, symbolizes the ‘heart’ where as the sun symbolizes the ‘essence of God’. Most of his concepts
begin with the circle creating the symbol of the lotus flower, the moon and the Wau (traditional kite). This clearly
states that the shape of the circle has its reasons and meanings in the concept of God in Malay art interpretation.
Keith Critchlow (1976) in his research about Islamic Patterns based on the analytical and cosmological approach
has defined that the circle is the basic shape for other polygon such as square, hexagon, triangle and other
polygon. Because of its divisibility, the circle is the basis for all polygonal geometric design. However, Syed
Ahmad Jamal (1992) has defined the cosmos element as one of the Malay woodcarving elements. From the basic
circle, it divides into a general semicircle structure known as a Potong Limau (lemon slice) and a quadrant. The
semicircle is usually used as the motif Gunungan on top of the entrance doorway. The basic square structure is
commonly used in the Malay traditional woodcarving.
A square is a common structural unit for all the polygonal designs, widely used in multiples of four. It is
similar to the geometric element used in the Malay woodcarving motif as defined by Syed Ahmad Jamal (1992).
The square shape represents a symbol of earth, materiality, and boundary between the internal and external world
in which human behaviours have their limitation and guide. This view is further supported by Zakaria Ali (1989).
It is from the basic square that the design base can be expanded into a design base, those of horizontal rectangle,
vertical rectangle, quadrant and triangle in shapes. The triangle represents the symbol of human consciousness. It
is commonly used as a base for brackets (sesiku) reducing the sharp 90 degree angle, a principle of opposite
(berlawan) in Malay aesthetics. Having chosen the basic structure, either one of the four-arabesque structures is
needed in the Malay traditional woodcarving motif. Ismail R. Lamya Al Faruqi (1992) has defined the four
different structures as the multi-unit structures, the interlocking structure, the meander structure and the
expanding structure. The first two structures are discontinuous and the rest are continuous. Most Malay
woodcarving motifs exercise one of these structures. In Abdul Halim Nasir’s (1987) analysis, these four
structures have similarities. He has defined three patterns in the woodcarving motif. They are the complete
pattern (pola lengkap), the single pattern (pola bujang) and the combination pattern. Figure 1 shows a diagram of
the steps in understanding structures used in the Malay woodcarving motif.

STEP 1:
Basic Form - Basic Structures from Circle, Square or Polygon

Square Circle Polygon

Vertical Horizontal Triangle Semicircle Quadrant Half-Polygon


Rectangle Rectangle
828 Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831

STEP 1:
Basic Form - Basic Structures from Circle, Square or Polygon

Complete Pattern Combination Pattern Single Pattern Complete Pattern

Step II: Basic Outline – Base Structure from Spiral

The details of the flower motif, usually used by Malay traditional customs, medicine and religious
ceremony are formed from circle based shapes. Each flower symbolises different meaning and
interpretation.
Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831 829

Step III: Detailed Interpretation and Symbolised of the motif

BungaCengkih Ketam Guri Bunga Teratai


(Clove Flower) Usually used in wood (Lotus Flower)
Used as herbs in traditional carving motif to Symbolised for faith, belief
cooking for flavour and symbolised Semangat or and purity
sweet smell spirit

Fig.2. (a) Step 1: Basic Structures from Circle and Square; (b) Step 1: Basic Structures from Circle and Square;
(c) Step II: Basic Outline – Base Structure from Spiral; (d) Step III: Detailed Interpretation and Symbolizing of the motif

5.2 Step II: Basic Outline – Base Structure from Spiral

The next phase is the spiral and sinusoids lines used as the base structure to support the main motif structure. In
the first phase, Siti Zainon (1986) defined that the creation of the spiral and meander lines (sinusoids) begins from
the basic dotted elements or lines in the basic visual elements. In Malay woodcarving, the element of plants and the
cosmos are integrated in a motif as the manifestation of nature’s beauty and the great creation of Allah. Plants and
cosmic forms are translated into a shape or structure based on the spiral. According to Claude Humbert (1980) in
his research based on the mathematical geometry approach, the spiral will complete the sinusoid as the structural
basis for foliage and decoration. However according to Syed Ahmad Jamal (1992), the cosmic element Awan Larat
is variedly translated as floating clouds, parading clouds and meandering clouds but the floral elements are based on
the characteristic of the tendrils and stems as part of the Malay design. The variation of structural lines (spiral and
sinusoid) has given a considerable range of possibilities, particularly in foliage decoration. The idea is also
represented in Malay literature by Abdullah Mohamed or Nakula (1978):
830 Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831

“...sprouting, bending not pointing upward, pointing downward but not”


(Abdullah Mohamed: 1978)

Nakula (1978) described that the foliage in the woodcarving motif represents the nature of the plant’s biological
character and it relates to the character of the spiral and sinusoid structured lines. The sinusoid structural line
comes as three basic characters, which are single-stranded (narrow or wide), double-stranded plait and plait with
two parallel strands. These characteristics are usually used in the Malay traditional woodcarving to interpret the
plant and cosmic elements of the Malay woodcarving motifs. A combination of two structural lines also creates
intersection-like structures and other structures in the woodcarving motif. Figure 4.4 shows a diagram of the second
step in understanding the structure used in the Malay woodcarving motif.

5.3 Step III: Detailed Interpretation and Symbolized of the motif

The last phase in the structure of the woodcarving motif base is a combination of the first and second phase
structures with added details on each motif. The circle, spiral structure lines are used to construct the details. This
phase also represents the elements of the intricate, beautifications and fineness of Malay aesthetics. Each motif
symbolizes the meaning of the carving itself. For example, the lotus flower symbolizes purity and faith. Symbolism
is part of the Malay aesthetic principles. Most of the elements used in woodcarving motifs have their own meaning
and interpretation. Symbolic meanings in the woodcarving motifs are influenced by the Malay customs, religion,
daily life activities and nature. Examples of the plant element used in a woodcarving motif are the Bunga Cengkih
(clove flower) which is used as herb and spice for flavour and sweet smell in the traditional cooking. The Bunga
Teratai (lotus flower) is used in woodcarving motifs to symbolize faith, belief and purity of the human character.
The Ketam Guri, a flower usually used in woodcarving motifs to symbolize Semangat or spirit. The structure must
be balanced and harmonious with the whole structure. Based on the characteristic of the motif, it is arranged
proportionately to be framed or in boundary during the first phase. The main structure line should move in parallel
and interlaid with the flower and leaf motif in order to make the eye focus on the internal area of the motif. Figure
4.5 shows a diagram of the third step in understanding structures used in the Malay woodcarving motif.

5.4 Step IV: Craft Education Artwork

The topic of creating motifs and patterns according to culture, tradition and heritage should be introduced in the
syllabus of Dunia Seni Visual in primary and Pendidikan Seni Visual in secondary schools. In primary schools’
syllabus be it the KBSR or KSSR, students are encouraged to produce art pieces to show their appreciation towards
arts and our heritage. In the Pendidikan Seni Visual KBSM, introduction and the stress on arts crafts like Batik,
embroidery (Tekat), cross-etching, ceramics etc. need the students’ creativity in creating and interpreting the
respective crafts and their traditional motifs. Hence, through the study done on structures of Malay woodcarving,
students will be able to create new motifs according to the steps discussed above. At the tertiary level, Universiti
Teknologi MARA for example offers programs such as Art and Design Education in Faculty of Education as well
as Faculty of Arts and Design where students are given courses such as ADE 630: Craft Design and Function and
ADE 680: Craft Design and Society. Both courses require students to expand their ideas in creating new motifs for
arts and crafts products like Batik, embroidery (Tekat) and beads embroidery, ceramics, book crafts, shadow puppet
etc. Hence, with the 3 step approach in creating a motif through Malay woodcarving structures, students will be
able to apply them in creating new motifs in their art pieces.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study describes the connection between the motifs of the traditional Terengganu Malay
woodcarving artworks with the philosophical values of the Malays. The aesthetical values of the Malay traditional
style are also being stressed and not neglected. It is important for the new generation to really understand the process
Sumardianshah Silah et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 823 – 831 831

of creating the motifs. This will ensure that the motifs bring along the original values and so that the heritage and the
traditional culture can be preserved. It is hoped that by conducting further future research which are more thorough
in nature, the production of the motifs by younger generation will be done with true understanding of the traditional
motifs, one which is not affected by the global modernization as it has becomes an inspiration to my artwork.

Bibliography
Abdullah Mohamed, (1978). Falsafah Dan Pemikiran Orang-Orang Melayu: Hubungan dengan Islam dan Kesenian. Kuala Lumpur:
Penerbitan Kementerian Kebudayaan, Belia dan Sukan Malaysia.
Alina Abdullah Abdullah, Dzul Haimi Md Zain. (2011). Mencari Keseimbangan dalam Ragam Hias Warkah Melayu Nusantara. Paper
presented at Seminar Antarabangsa Warisan Nusantara dan Bicara Kraft Warisan. (pp.6) Kota Kinabalu: UMS Press.
Agile Rabbit Editions.(2002). Islamic Designs. Amsterdam: The Pepin Press
Badrul Isa, Abdul Shukor Hashim, Zuraimi Zakaria. (2007). Pendekatan Menggunakan Objek dan Artifak Muzium Sebagai Sumber
Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual di Fakulti Pendidikan, UiTM. Seminar Kebangsaan Isu-Isu Pendidikan, UKM.
Claude Humbert. (1980). Islamic Ornamental Design. London: Faber & Faber Limited.
Daud Sutton. (2007). Islamic Design. A Genius for Geometry. UK: Wooden Book Ltd.
E.H. Gombrich.(2005). Tradition and Innovation I: 15 century in Italy: The Story of Art. London: Phaidon Press Inc.
Eisner, E. W. (1981). On the Differences between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research. Educational Researcher, 10(4),
5-9.
Farish A. Noor & Eddin Khoo. (2003). Spirit of Wood: The Art of Malay Woodcarving. Singapore: Periplus Edition (HK) Ltd.
Fred Tomalli. (2006). Abductor.Accessed on 10 December 2011, from http://www. Mutualart.com/Artwork/Abductor.
Haslinda Abd Razak, BaharimKhusil. (2011). Adaptation and Application of Ornament by Malaysian Painting Proceeding of Seminar Seni
Visual.Praktik dan Penyelidikan.TanjongMalim: UPSI Press.
Isma’il R. Lamya Al Faruqi.(1992). Atlas Budaya Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Keith Critchlow. (1976). Islamic Patterns: An analytical and Cosmological Approach. Schocken Books, New York, USA.
Khatijah Sanusi. (1996). Expression of Islamic Art in Malaysia: Unity in Diversity. Curatorial writing of exhibition catalogue exhibition of
Pengucapan Islam dalam Kesenian. Kuala Lumpur: Galeri Petronas.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research (Third Edition ed.): Sage Publication.
Marshall, J. (2007). Image as Insight: Visual Images in Practice-Based Research. Studies in Art Education 49(1), 23-41.
Mohamad Tajuddin. (2005). The Discontinued Tradition of Malay Wood Carvings in Modern and Post-Modern Architecture in Malaysia: A
Failure to Develop the Discourse on Ornamentation in Architectural Works. Journal of the Semangat Kayu. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan
Muzium Negara.
Muhammad AfandiYahya. (1995). Simbolisme Dalam Seni Bina Rumah Melayu Kelantan, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka and
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
NisreenMoustafa. (2008). Devine Inspiration. Seven Principles of Islamic Architecture. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia
Publications. P.18
NorhaizaNoordin. (2005). Mengekalkan Motif Ukiran Kayu Tradisi Masa Kini. Journal of the Spirit & Form in Malay Design. Kuala Lumpur:
Muzium Seni Islam.
Nur Hanim Mohamed Khairuddin. (2011). Raja’ah .Seni, Idea, dan Kreativiti Sulaiman Esa dari 1950an-2011. Kuala Lumpur: Balai Seni
Visual Negara.
Siti Zainon Ismail. (2005). Meng’Ukir’ Budi Melayu.Journal of the Akal Budi Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Pengajian Bahasa
Kesusasteraandan Kebudayaan Melayu, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Siti Zainon Ismail. (1986), Rekabentuk Kraftangan Malayu Tradisi.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Siti Zainon Ismail. (1997). The Traditional Malay Handcraft. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Sumardianshah Silah, Ruzaika Omar Basaree, Abdul Shukor Hashim, Badrul Isa. (2011). Rekaan Struktur pada Motif Ukiran Melayu
Terenggganu. Paper presented at Seminar Antarabangsa Warisan Nusantara dan Bicara Kraft Warisan. (pp.6) Kota Kinabalu: UMS
Press.
Syed Ahmad Jamal. (1992). Rupa & Jiwa. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Syed Ahmad Jamal. (2007). The Encyclopedia of Malaysia: Crafts and the Visual Arts. Kuala Lumpur: Archiopelago Press.
Zakaria Ali (1989) Seni dan Seniman: Esei-esei Seni Halus.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa &Pustaka.

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться