Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
If you are bullish on the economic outlook, you can easily do some adjustments
and come to the conclusion that today’s payroll number was actually closer to
200k than 100k. On top of that, the Household survey did rebound by 297k
after two awful months, and led by full-time positions this time around. In fact,
when the BLS puts the Household survey on a comparable footing to the
Establishment survey (the payroll- and population-concept adjusted data) it
showed a whopper of a +500k increase last month, the largest increase since
January 2010. The payroll diffusion index also surged to 60 from 52, the best
level in two months, and indicative of more firms adding to their staff loads last
month. So while the low headline number did not show much in the way of size,
the diffusion index did show some decent “breadth” in equity market lingo.
While the details were obviously better than the headline, it would be a mistake
to read much into the unexpected decline in the unemployment rate, which fell
to 9.4% from 9.8% — the lowest it has been since May 2009 (when the economy
was still technically in recession) and the sharpest one-month decline since April
1998. While some of this “decline” did indeed reflect the rebound in Household
employment, it was largely due to the sharp decline in the labour force
participation rate, which tumbled to a 27-year low of 64.3% in December from
64.5% in each of the prior two months. The culprit — discouraged workers
soared to a new record high of 1.32 million.
Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. is one of Canada’s pre-eminent wealth management firms. Founded in 1984 and focused primarily on high net
worth private clients, we are dedicated to meeting the needs of our clients by delivering strong, risk-adjusted returns together with the highest
level of personalized client service. For more information or to subscribe to Gluskin Sheff economic reports, visit www.gluskinsheff.com
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
If the participation rate had not taken the dive that it did, the unemployment
rate would have come in at 9.7%, which is precisely what the consensus had The “employment rate” or the
penned in. Notice that we said “decline” above instead of “improvement”. employment-to-population
ratio barely rose and stands
When the all-inclusive U-6 jobless rate is stuck in the stratosphere at 16.7%, and now at 58.3%
when the average duration of unemployment heads back up to a near-record of
34.2 weeks; and when the share of the unemployed ranks looking for a job
without success rises two-percentage points to 44.3% (the actual level jumped
113k to 6.44 million), it is hardly time to uncork the champagne bottle. Based
on Ben Bernanke’s comments today, that day is at least four years away. Best
to keep it chilled.
Despite all the sprinkling of bright spots beneath the veneer of the report which I
highlighted above, if you were to ask me what the key takeaways from the report
were, I would point to three:
First, the workweek did not move at all — it is stuck at 34.3 hours for the third
month in a row. And we know from history that hours lead bodies so as a
forward-looking barometer, there isn’t much there to point to in terms of
strengthening labour demand ahead, with all deference to the gentle decline we
are seeing in jobless claims trends.
Second, state and local governments, which comprise 15% of the total jobs pie,
are clearly in a major downsizing mode with 20k net job losses last month. This
sector can be expected to remain a dead-weight drag on the overall jobs market State and local governments,
through the balance of the year, and if the new Congress has its way, the same which comprise 15% of the
holds true for the federal government as well. total jobs pie, are clearly in a
major downsizing mode with
Third, nothing is more important for the economy than personal income, and the 20k net job losses last month
work-based pay segment of the data was wholly disappointing, with average
hourly earnings barely eking out a gain at all last month on top of a flat
November. Together with the stagnant workweek and the prospect of a large
gas-induced increase in the CPI for December (consensus now is at +0.4%),
what we are talking about is a possible contraction in real personal income to
finish the year off, which may explain why it is that chain store sales
disappointed in December. But this also means that companies are continuing
to constrain their labour costs, which in turn suggests that Q4 profits will come
in decent — this has been the message from Mr. Market for the past few weeks
to be sure. Then again, why pay your workers anything when Uncle Sam is going
Page 2 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
to step in to do it for you? The payroll tax relief is just now beginning to take
hold.
66.75
66.00
65.25
64.50
63.75
63.00
85 90 95 00 05 10
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
30
25
20
15
10
85 90 95 00 05 10
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
Page 3 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
CHART 3: DITTO
United States: Unemployment for 27 Weeks and Over: Percentage of Civilians
Unemployed
(percentage)
52.5
45.0
37.5
30.0
22.5
15.0
7.5
85 90 95 00 05 10
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
95 00 05 10
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
Page 4 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
It should also be duly noted that Canada is posting these employment advances
with construction employment now on a downward trend — in fact, payrolls in
this sector were down 27k last month in the worst showing in nearly two years.
The baton seems to have been handed to the smokestack and transportation
sectors, as well as accommodation/food, which is somewhat of a proxy for
tourism. To be sure, it is a tad unusual to be seeing the segments of the
Canadian economy most linked to the global backdrop (which the Bank of A meaningful job recovery that
Canada has expressed verbal concern over) and the ever-stronger currency, to has proven to be so elusive
be outperforming the other sectors at this time. But this is exactly the picture state-side, has become very
the data are portraying. There may be a “payback” in coming months, but by well entrenched north of the
then, we could very well see domestic cyclical services regain their previous border
strength. All that can be said is that a meaningful job recovery that has proven
to be so elusive state-side, has become very well entrenched north of the
border.
Through the first nine months of the year, the Canadian economy was
generating about 40k net new jobs per month and in Q4, that pace moderated
to an average of 20k, which is as close to not-too-hot/not-too-cold as you can
get. Nothing here for the Bank of Canada to get excited about, that is for sure.
Page 5 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
Growth has moderated, the expected closing of the output gap has been
delayed by a full year and underlying inflation pressures remain well contained —
as evidenced by the fact that median wage growth was basically flat last month.
While the junior hockey team may have the vast majority of Canadians in
lingering disbelief, there is nothing shameful about what the economy here is
doing, because without the need for the Bank of Canada to jeopardize the
sanctity of its balance sheet, and without the need of the federal government to
blow a hole in its fiscal finances (as is the case south of the border), 370k net
new jobs were created in 2010, which made this the best year for employment
growth in eight years. The unemployment rate, on an apples-to-apples
comparison to the U.S.A., is now at 6.5% on a seasonally adjusted basis versus
9.8% state-side, a record gap in Canada’s favour. Little wonder that the loonie
has flown above the eagle in recent weeks. Canadian employment reached a
new all-time high in August and has built on that performance since and is now
nearly 50k above the pre-recession while U.S. payrolls, despite the
improvement, are still languishing below the former peak by over 7 million.
-1
-2
-3
06 07 08 09 10
Source: Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
Page 6 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
-4
-8
-12
06 07 08 09 10
Source: Statistics Canada /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
0.0
-2.5
-5.0
-7.5
-10.0
-12.5
06 07 08 09 10
Source: Statistics Canada /Haver Analytics
Source: Haver Analytics, Gluskin Sheff
Page 7 of 9
January 7, 2011 – LUNCH WITH DAVE
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Copyright 2011 Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc. (“Gluskin Sheff”). All rights and, in some cases, investors may lose their entire principal investment.
reserved. This report is prepared for the use of Gluskin Sheff clients and Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Levels
subscribers to this report and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or and basis for taxation may change.
disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express
written consent of Gluskin Sheff. Gluskin Sheff reports are distributed Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or
simultaneously to internal and client websites and other portals by Gluskin income of any security or financial instrument mentioned in this report.
Sheff and are not publicly available materials. Any unauthorized use or Investors in such securities and instruments effectively assume currency
disclosure is prohibited. risk.
Gluskin Sheff may own, buy, or sell, on behalf of its clients, securities of Materials prepared by Gluskin Sheff research personnel are based on public
issuers that may be discussed in or impacted by this report. As a result, information. Facts and views presented in this material have not been
readers should be aware that Gluskin Sheff may have a conflict of interest reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in
that could affect the objectivity of this report. This report should not be other business areas of Gluskin Sheff. To the extent this report discusses
regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment any legal proceeding or issues, it has not been prepared as nor is it
and readers are encouraged to seek independent, third-party research on intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors
any companies covered in or impacted by this report. should consult their own legal advisers as to issues of law relating to the
subject matter of this report. Gluskin Sheff research personnel’s knowledge
Individuals identified as economists do not function as research analysts of legal proceedings in which any Gluskin Sheff entity and/or its directors,
under U.S. law and reports prepared by them are not research reports under officers and employees may be plaintiffs, defendants, co—defendants or
applicable U.S. rules and regulations. Macroeconomic analysis is co—plaintiffs with or involving companies mentioned in this report is based
considered investment research for purposes of distribution in the U.K. on public information. Facts and views presented in this material that relate
under the rules of the Financial Services Authority. to any such proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed with, and
may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas
Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer or an of Gluskin Sheff in connection with the legal proceedings or matters
invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial relevant to such proceedings.
instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g.,
options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences). This report is not Any information relating to the tax status of financial instruments discussed
intended to provide personal investment advice and it does not take into herein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to
account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the provide tax advice. Investors are urged to seek tax advice based on their
particular needs of any specific person. Investors should seek financial particular circumstances from an independent tax professional.
advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial instruments
and implementing investment strategies discussed or recommended in this The information herein (other than disclosure information relating to Gluskin
report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects Sheff and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and Gluskin
may not be realized. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in Sheff does not guarantee its accuracy. This report may contain links to
any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such third—party websites. Gluskin Sheff is not responsible for the content of any
security or the information in the prospectus or other offering document third—party website or any linked content contained in a third—party website.
issued in connection with such offering, and not on this report. Content contained on such third—party websites is not part of this report
and is not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link
Securities and other financial instruments discussed in this report, or in this report does not imply any endorsement by or any affiliation with
recommended by Gluskin Sheff, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Gluskin Sheff.
Insurance Corporation and are not deposits or other obligations of any
insured depository institution. Investments in general and, derivatives, in All opinions, projections and estimates constitute the judgment of the
particular, involve numerous risks, including, among others, market risk, author as of the date of the report and are subject to change without notice.
counterparty default risk and liquidity risk. No security, financial instrument Prices also are subject to change without notice. Gluskin Sheff is under no
or derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities and obligation to update this report and readers should therefore assume that
other financial instruments may be difficult to value or sell and reliable Gluskin Sheff will not update any fact, circumstance or opinion contained in
information about the value or risks related to the security or financial this report.
instrument may be difficult to obtain. Investors should note that income
Neither Gluskin Sheff nor any director, officer or employee of Gluskin Sheff
from such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate
accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential
and that price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fall
damages or losses arising from any use of this report or its contents.
Page 9 of 9