Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared for
Prepared by
November 2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1
List of Tables
Table 4.1: Roof Loading .............................................................................................................. 4-1
Table 4.2: Structural Design Software ......................................................................................... 4-2
Table 4.3: Heavyweight Nonwoven Geotextile Fabric Properties .............................................. 4-6
Appendices
Appendix A – Hydraulic Model Data
Appendix B – Structural Design Data
Appendix C – Miscellaneous Information
i 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
1 Introduction
The existing Millsite Dam is not in compliance with current minimum Utah Dam Safety
standards. As a result, a berm will be constructed at the toe of the existing dam to stabilize the
dam for seismic conditions. This berm necessitates the extension of the outlet works further
downstream.
Franson Civil Engineers (FCE) is assisting the Utah Division of Water Resources (Water
Resources) with design work for the Millsite Dam Rehabilitation. FCE is preparing the Outlet
Works section of the Millsite Dam Rehabilitation Design Report. This section focuses on the
extension and relocation of the existing outlet works. For project background details, refer to the
Millsite Dam Rehabilitation Design Report prepared by Water Resources.
The proposed outlet works extension and relocation will include the following main construction
items:
1-1 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
• An 8-inch steel pipe which serves the Castle Valley Special Service District. It has an
exterior paint coating. The existence of an interior coating is uncertain. It runs from the
bulkhead of the inlet tower, down through the tunnel and control house, and into a meter
box to the south of the control house. This pipe joins with a 12-inch steel pipe in this box,
which then transitions into a 24-inch pipe and serves the special service district. The
upper end of the pipe has a gate valve and two gate valves in the meter box which can
isolate the meter. This entire pipe up to the upstream gate valve will be replaced as part of
this project due to corrosion of the pipe and a desire of the special service district to
increase the size of this pipe.
• A 12-inch steel pipe which serves the special service district. It has an exterior epoxy
coating in the tunnel, transitioning to a painted coating outside the tunnel. The existence
of an interior coating is uncertain. The pipe tees off of the 54-inch pipe in the control
house, and then runs to the same meter box as the 8-inch steel pipe previously mentioned.
This 12-inch pipe transitions to a 24-inch pipe that runs southeast, and then bends to the
east on the south side of the maintenance shed, continuing east towards the service
district’s facilities. The 24-inch pipe is reported to be ductile iron. The 12-inch pipe has a
gate valve in the tunnel, a valve just upstream of the meter box, and one in the meter box.
There is an older dysfunctional meter in the meter box, and a saddle type magmeter or
paddle wheel meter.
• A 24-inch steel pipe serving PacifiCorp that tees off of the 54-inch mainline in the
control house, and then runs into a metering building to the north of the control house,
where it is metered using an orifice meter. The pipe then transitions to a 26-inch
fiberglass pipe after the metering building. The pipe has one main butterfly valve in the
control house, but has a 6-inch bypass line around the main valve with two gate valves
and a globe valve, the gate valves being able to isolate the globe valve. PacifiCorp has
specifically requested that their steel pipe be replaced with ASTM grade B, 24-inch O.D.
pipe with 3/8-inch wall thickness, and that a custom spigot x flanged fitting, which they
would provide, and a JCM Style 304 adapter be used to join the new steel pipe to the
existing fiberglass pipe.
2-1 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
• The Ferron Canal and Reservoir Company has a newer control vault downstream of the
historical control house. In this structure, two 36-inch steel pipes tee off of the main pipe.
Each pipe has a butterfly valve, but each also has a 6-inch bypass line around the
butterfly valve. Each bypass has two gate valves and a globe valve, the gate valves being
able to isolate the globe valve. The 36-inch lines turn east after exiting the control box.
The 36-inch pipes transition to PVC pipe downstream of the control box.
• A 12-inch steel stock waterline branches off of one of the 36-inch pipes, upstream of the
main 36-inch butterfly valve. This stock waterline has one butterfly valve. It turns east
after exiting the control vault. This stock waterline transitions to PVC pipe downstream
of the control vault.
• There are floor drains and groundwater drains under the canal company’s newer control
vault which run into a manhole southeast of the structure, and then drain into the stream
channel.
• A drain which collects seepage in the old tunnel, and the left toe drain, currently runs
through the newer control vault where they can be diverted into buckets for measurement.
The drain pipes then run out of the vault and into the stream channel.
• The golf course has diversions coming off of the special service district’s line, and off of
the stock waterline owned by the canal company. Both of the golf course’s lines run to
the west side of the maintenance shed where they feed a pump. Both of these lines are
6-inch PVC until they transition to HDPE pipe just before they enter the pump.
2-2 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
3 Outlet Pipe
3.1 Pipe Wall Thickness
The existing outlet pipe is a 54-inch epoxy-coated steel pipe. As indicated in the record drawings,
the original wall thickness was 5/16 inches. Water Resources has recently commissioned a study
evaluating the integrity of the existing outlet pipe. The structural analysis showed that at some
locations there was a decrease in the wall thickness of approximately 1/16 inches, with the lowest
reading showing a loss of 5/64 inches due to water dripping on the pipe from seams in the tunnel.
The deteriorating affects have been mitigated and Dam Safety anticipates that the outlet pipe
should have at least 50 more years of service life. The analysis also indicated that the maximum
stress in the outlet pipe, as a result of the full reservoir head, bending and settlement stresses, and
seismic forces would be 7,500 psi, well under the assumed minimum yield strength of 30,000 psi.
FCE evaluated this study and determined that an additional study to determine the required wall
thickness of the outlet pipe extension was not necessary and that it would be a reasonable
assumption to maintain the original wall thickness of 5/16 inches for the new section of outlet pipe.
The outlet flow was obtained from data on the Emery Water Conservancy District website and
represents the maximum flow released from the outlet to the North, South, and Molen Ditches on
the same day between June 2002 and June 2014. The remaining peak demands were supplied by
the respective project stakeholders.
The model shows that the 54-inch and 36-inch transmission pipelines are capable of supplying the
peak demands until the reservoir level drops to approximately 12 feet of head. When the water
level in the reservoir drops to 12 feet above the inlet to the outlet works, the peak demands above
cannot be met concurrently. This water level is 38 feet below the conservation pool water level and
as such the peak demands could not be requested by the water users. Based on the model and this
observation, the 54-inch pipe and a short section of 36-inch pipe can meet the peak demands of the
system.
3-1 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
The current outlet works facilities consist of the original building and four separate underground
vaults. All the facilities had their own access point to an aboveground entrance with a door and
stairs. All the stakeholders expressed support for an efficient pipe layout to be housed in a single
vault. Various versions of the pipe layout were distributed among the stakeholders for comment
until the final layout seen in the design drawings was agreed upon.
Vault
The loads considered for design of the concrete outlet vault were snow loads, earthquake loads,
live loads and dead loads typical for this area and type of building. Wind loads were not
considered due to the vault being mostly buried. The structural steel design of the roof joists is to
be determined by the steel joist manufacturer and coordinated by the contractor. Assumptions
were made as to the type and weight of members to be used so that an accurate dead load could
be determined. Snow loads were determined from the location and elevation of the site and are in
accordance with building code requirements. Live loads were assumed to be typical roof
maintenance loads. Table 4.1 shows the roof loads considered in the vault design. It should be
noted that the vault’s roof was not designed with the loads shown in Table 4.1. The roof loads
shown in the table were used to estimate the loading on the vertical walls of the vault.
The design loads in various loading combinations were considered and the most conservative
loading was taken and used for the rest of the design. The design load was distributed over the
roof structure and the resulting loads on the walls were determined. These roof loads in
combination with backfilling and soil loads were then used to design the walls of the vault. Two
methods were used for the wall design. Some of the walls were supported internally by other
walls. These walls were designed using the Portland Cement Association’s design guide for
rectangular concrete tanks. All other walls that were completely or partially unsupported by other
4-1 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
walls were designed as retaining structures using QuickRWall structural design software. The
results of both design methods were compared and the more conservative rebar configuration
was used for all walls for consistency.
The design of the wall footings was taken from the QuickRWall analysis of the walls as retaining
structures. The loads considered for the floor design included the resulting loads from the wall
design, the supporting soil under the structure, the weight of the pipes and equipment in the
vault, the water weight for filled pipes, and dead and live loads according to building code
requirements. Several critical sections were considered for the flood design, and each were
analyzed for maximum shear and moments. The results of the analysis of all the critical sections
were compared and the critical rebar section was determined. This rebar section was used
throughout the floor for consistency, with the exception of the floor that is also the wall footing.
A concrete support beam was needed to span the vault from the end of the tunnel to the adjacent
internal corner of the vault to support the south wall of the concrete masonry unit (CMU)
building. The loads on this beam include the typical roof loads, the weight of the CMU wall, and
dead and live loads from the steel floor to be used on the upper level of the structure. The beam
was analyzed using spSlab software and the critical rebar section was determined. The outside
dimensions of the beam were determined by the necessary elevations of the supported roof
section and by the necessary connections of the CMU building and the steel floor.
The end of the beam near the tunnel will be supported by the thicker wall of the tunnel. The wall
on the other end of the beam could not support the loads transferred by the beam, so a column
had to be designed to create a strong enough support for the beam. The cross section of this
column was designed using spColumn structural design software. Refer to Table 4.2 for the
structural design software details.
Tunnel
The existing tunnel was designed in 1969. It is designed conservatively and the structure has not
had any problems to date. The extension of the tunnel will use the same design as the original
based on details from the 1969 drawings created by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service.
4-2 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
The special service district has requested that the existing 8-inch pipe connected at the head of
the tunnel be replaced with a 12-inch pipe based upon future demands of their system. The
options of Fusible PVC, Polypropylene, HDPE, and Steel pipe were evaluated to replace the
steel line. The evaluation criteria included stiffness, design life, thermal expansion,
constructability, and cost. A summary of the criteria was presented to the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) and Water Resources for their recommendation. It was conveyed
to FCE that steel pipes are the standard for use in dam tunnel applications. This 12-inch pipeline
will connect to the main special service district pipeline in the vault and will be equipped with a
new magnetic flow meter and control valve. Fusible PVC and polypropylene pipe are viable
alternatives. The selection of steel pipe was based on the recommendation of Water Resources
and NRCS.
Currently, the special service district has one 12-inch line connected to the main outlet pipe. This
pipe merges with the existing 8-inch pipe running through the tunnel in a separate vault and then
transitions to a 24-inch pipeline. To simplify the operation of these two pipelines, they will
connect in the new vault. There is not a current bypass filling pipe for the culinary lines;
therefore, one will not be added.
The pipe inside the vault will be steel and will have welded or flanged connections with a
coating of fusion bonded epoxy. The wall thickness will match that of the main outlet pipe. The
diameter of this outlet was not modeled under this project and will match that of the existing
outlet.
The pipe material outside the vault connecting the steel pipe to the existing pipeline will consist
of 24-inch C905 PVC DR32.5. This pipe has a pressure rating of 125 psi and a minimum wall
thickness of 0.794 inches. Ductile iron fittings with mechanical joints and thrust blocks will be
used to make required bends.
The pipeline will be configured with a 6-inch bypass filling pipe to match the existing layout.
PacifiCorp specifically requested the Endress Hauser Promag Electromagnetic Flowmeter to
meet required material standards. The pipe inside the vault will be welded and flanged fusion-
bonded epoxy-coated steel. The wall thickness will match that of the main outlet pipe. The
diameter of the PacifiCorp outlet was not modeled under this project and will match the size of
the existing outlet.
The majority of the pipeline that conveys water to the Hunter Power Plant is a 26-inch fiberglass
pipe. The dam rehabilitation requires a section of the existing fiberglass pipe to be removed for
4-3 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
the plunge pool. C905 PVC pipe is being used between the steel pipe in the vault and the existing
fiberglass pipe. PacifiCorp has requested that the C905 PVC pipe be DR18 instead of the
DR32.5 needed for the anticipated pressure for mechanical strength and durability. The DR18
has a pressure rating of 235 psi and a minimal wall thickness of 1.433 inches. Ductile iron
fittings with mechanical joints and thrust blocks will be used to make required bends.
Specific fittings are required to make the connection between the C905 PVC pipe and the
fiberglass line. These fittings will be provided by PacifiCorp. The fittings consist of a spigot x
flanged fitting and a JCM style 304 adapter. PacifiCorp has indicated that the fiberglass pipe has
to be connected to at an existing bell end and there needs to be a minimum distance of 40 feet
upstream of the adapter to the nearest bend.
The pipelines will be configured with a 6-inch bypass filling pipe to match the existing layout.
Where possible, the existing pipes, valves and fittings will be salvaged and reused. The pipes
inside the vault will be welded and flanged fusion-bonded epoxy-coated steel. The wall thickness
will match that of the main outlet pipe. The diameter of these outlets was not modeled under this
project and will match that of the existing outlet. The piping for these two outlets was
constructed in 2000. The owner would like the valves and fittings reused in the new design. Bid
items will be included for the refurbishment of these parts as well as for furnishing and installing
new parts. Currently the water is not metered and the owner at this point does not have the need
to place meters in the vault.
The pipes outside the vault connecting the steel pipes to the existing pipelines will be 36-inch
C905 PVC DR32.5. This pipe has a pressure rating of 125 psi and a minimum wall thickness of
0.794 inches. Ductile iron fittings with mechanical joints and thrust blocks will be used to make
required bends.
This pipeline services the stock water needs of the canal company. The pipe inside the vault will
be welded and flanged fusion-bonded epoxy-coated steel. The wall thickness will match that of
the main outlet pipe. The diameter of these outlets was not modeled under this project and will
match that of the existing outlet.
4-4 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
replacement valve should be capable of supplying the maximum demand of the owners. To
determine this maximum demand, the sum of the maximum flows ever recorded in each of the
three ditches downstream of the outlet works (North, South, and Molen Ditches) were identified.
Flow data from June 2002 to June 2014 were searched and the maximum flow reading for each
ditch was identified. The maximum flows are 112.6 cfs, 128.7 cfs, and 112.6 cfs for the North
Ditch, South Ditch, and Molen Ditch, respectively. The maximum flow in each of the ditches did
not occur at the same time, thus making this a very conservative estimate. The total of these
flows equals 353.9 cfs. The discharge needed to drain 90% of the reservoir in 30 days is 347 cfs.
The selected valve should be able to discharge a minimum of 354 cfs to meet the maximum
demand.
The following factors were considered in the selection of a control valve: type of discharge (jet,
spray, etc.), size available, cavitation, energy dissipation (into air or submerged), discharge
velocity, ease and cost of operation and maintenance, and capital cost. The size of the discharge
plunge pool and the resilience of the erosion control measures are largely dependent on the
velocity and type of discharge. High velocity discharges require more space to contain the
discharge as well as a resilient plunge pool and erosion mechanism to dissipate energy.
The valves considered include the following: jet flow gate, fixed cone valves (HB valve and ring
jet), and plunger valve. Because of space constraints at the Millsite Dam discharge area, valves
emitting high velocity jets (jet flow gate and ring jet valve), and the valve with large, hollow,
expanding spray discharge (HB valve without a valve chamber), were eliminated from
consideration unless improvements could overcome these limitations. The spray discharge can be
mitigated by installing the HB valve in a valve chamber. The plunger valve discharges a jet that
is the same size as the valve. The plunger valve and the HB valve installed in a valve chamber
were the most favorable alternatives for this project and these two options were studied further.
In addition to a hood to confine the spray from the HB valve, a separate valve chamber is
needed. The HB valve is very noisy and it is common for the valve chamber to be very wet. For
this reason, the HB valve has the additional expense of a separate chamber. The HB valve has
more moving parts and therefore has a greater need for maintenance and greater chance of failure
when compared to the plunger valve. The discharge coefficient for a plunger valve is 0.58 and
that of a HB valve is 0.85. As a result, a larger plunger valve is required to discharge the same
flow as a HB valve. For this reason, a plunger valve is slightly more expensive than a HB valve
with the additional hood and valve chamber. The plunger valve has been selected because it is a
simple system, requires low maintenance, and has a longer design life. Also, the plunger valve is
capable of dissipating some energy within the valve before free discharge into the air or plunge
pool. The plunger valve is not as noisy as the HB valve and can be installed inside the pipe vault,
thus allowing all of the outlets to be operated from a single vault. A short stub of pipe with a
diameter greater than the plunger valve size will be installed at the outlet side of the valve to
convey the discharge outside the vault. This downstream pipe will be large enough to facilitate
the flow of air in the pipe.
At the request of the Ferron Canal and Reservoir Company, two plunger valves were selected.
The large valve was sized at 36 inches and will serve as the main discharge valve. The small
valve sized at 10 inches was selected to adjust the discharge downstream so accurate flows are
4-5 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
delivered to the North, South, and Molen Ditches. With the two plunger valves, 90% of the
reservoir’s capacity can be drained in 27 days.
The valves will be fitted with a hood and housed in the vault to protect them from freezing
during the winter season. The hood sizes and lengths are as follows:
The valve sizing and capacity information in this Outlet Works Design Report are based on
hydraulic calculations prepared by Water Resources. More detailed information about those
hydraulic calculations used to size the new discharge valves and calculate the reservoir
evacuation time is included in the outlet works section of the Millsite Dam Rehabilitation Design
Report prepared by Water Resources.
The existing plunge pool is part of the canal and it was observed that the wave action from
energy dissipation ended at about 80 feet downstream of the discharge structure. The new plunge
pool length will be approximately 100 feet. This length is sufficient to accommodate the
discharge jet from the outlet valves, plus wave action resulting from the energy dissipation in the
pool.
The pool will be lined with heavyweight nonwoven geotextile fabric and well-graded riprap with
a mean diameter of 18 inches. The geotextile used will meet the minimum property requirements
shown in Table 4.3.
4-6 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
The geotextile fabric will act as a soil filtration media. The riprap and geotextile when properly
installed will provide the necessary erosion control needed to prolong the life of the plunge pool
and reduce the frequency of maintenance.
Thrust blocking will be placed at each horizontal and vertical bend of the buried pipe. The
amount of thrust blocking required at each bend was calculated by the following equation:
𝜃𝜃
2PAsin 2
Thrust Block Soil Bearing Area =
𝑞𝑞𝑎𝑎
Where:
P = Working Pressure (psi)
A = Soil Bearing Area (in2)
q = Allowable Soil Strength (lbs/ft2)
𝜃𝜃 = Bend Angle (degrees)
At full capacity, the reservoir produces 115 feet of static head or 49.8 psi. A conservative value
of 2,000 psi was used for the allowable soil strength due to a lack of geotechnical data. An
additional factor of safety of 2.0 was incorporated into the design. The specifications will require
a 4,000 psi minimum concrete mix for the thrust blocking.
A cursory evaluation was made on the vault thrust blocking design of the improvements made in
2000. The amount of steel used seemed adequate for the design and the thrust blocking has
successfully performed for 14 years. Based on this evaluation, it was determined to use the same
thrust blocking design.
4-7 11/6/2015
Draft, Subject to Revision Millsite Dam Outlet Works Design Report
This improvement project will be beneficial for the stockholders, community, and surrounding
area. Aging water distribution utilities and related appurtenances will be replaced with new ones,
and pipes sizes will be increased in some cases to meet growing demand. These developments
will ensure that the system will be able to maintain its purpose of delivering water stored in the
reservoir for use by current and future users.
Design recommendations are based on data available and collected as described in this report.
Actual subsurface conditions may vary and could require design changes. If conditions vary
during construction, any significant changes or design issues will be presented to Dam Safety for
review and approval.
5-1 11/6/2015
APPENDIX A
Figure A-3: Pipe Table, Reservoir WSE @ 6219 Feet (Source: Bentley WaterCAD Hydraulic Model)
Figure A-4: Hydraulic Model Schematic, Reservoir WSE @ 6121.62 Feet (Source: Bentley WaterCAD Hydraulic Model)
Figure A-5: Junction Table, Reservoir WSE @ 6121.62 Feet (Source: Bentley WaterCAD Hydraulic Model)
Figure A-6: Pipe Table, Reservoir WSE @ 6121.62 Feet (Source: Bentley WaterCAD Hydraulic Model)
APPENDIX B
Millsite Outlet Vault
Roof Loads
Dead Loads for Roof
Roof Snow Load Calculation (From ASCE 7 pg. 90‐91) ASCE 7 = ASCE Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
Terrain Category C C for open terrain with scattered obstructions (pg 28‐29)
Exposure: Partial
Snow Exposure (Ce) 1.0 Table 7‐2 (pg 90) 1.0 for Terrain of C and Partial Exposure
Thermal Factor (Ct) 1.1 Table 7‐3 (pg 91) 1.2 for unheated structures
Snow Load Import (Is) 1.2 Table 7‐4 (pg 91) 1.2 for water treatment facilities and fireflow storage facilities
Snow load Calculation (From Utah Snow Load Calculation)
Base Snow Load (Po) 43 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE15A/htm/15A03_010700.htm
Change in Snow Load (S) 63 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r156/r156‐56.htm
Ao 6 Elev./1,000 Base Ground Snow Elev (Table 1608.1.2)
A 6.12 Elev./1,000 Elevation at site (ft/1000)
Ground Snow Load (Pg) 43.7 psf
Steel Roof
Steel Load 49 pcf
in ACI 318‐05 Table 9.5(c) pg.115‐assumes fy=60ksi with drop panels
12 in
1.00 ft
Factored Steel Load 63.7 psf 1.3*concrete load from roof
Live Loads for Roof
Live Loads
Live Load 20.0 psf IBC table 1607.1 pg.285‐6 Ordinary Flat Roof
Factored Live Load 26.0 psf
Total Live Load 26.0 psf Total live load for ADOSS
Factored Loading Conditions
1 w=1.4D+1.7L 206.8 psf Condition #1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
SpSlab default Loading Conditions
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Wall 2 Design
Reinforced Concrete Tank - Valve vault design
(Based on design in PCA Publication ‐ Rectangular Concrete Tanks)
Use this spreadsheet for only one loading condition at a time, either:
(1) Tank is full of water with no external soil load; or
(2) Tank is empty with only soil as an external load
If number (1) is used, then there are no surcharge loads to be considered, surcharge only applies
to external soil load conditions.
Vault Dimensions
a ‐ Height (floor to top of wall) 12.916667 ft
b ‐ Long Side (span, middle support) 19.333333 ft
c ‐ Short Side (span, middle support) 19.333333 ft
b/a (long wall) 1.50
c/a (short wall) 1.50
Dead Loads for Roof
Roof Snow Load Calculation (From ASCE 7 pg. 90‐91) ASCE 7 = ASCE Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
Terrain Category C C for open terrain with scattered obstructions (pg 28‐29)
Exposure: Partial
Snow Exposure (Ce) 1.0 Table 7‐2 (pg 90) 1.0 for Terrain of C and Partial Exposure
Thermal Factor (Ct) 1.1 Table 7‐3 (pg 91) 1.2 for unheated structures
Snow Load Import (Is) 1.2 Table 7‐4 (pg 91) 1.2 for water treatment facilities and fireflow storage facilities
Snow load Calculation (From Utah Snow Load Calculation)
Base Snow Load (Po) 43 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE15A/htm/15A03_010700.htm
Change in Snow Load (S) 63 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r156/r156‐56.htm
Ao 6 Elev./1,000 Base Ground Snow Elev (Table 1608.1.2)
A 6.12 Elev./1,000 Elevation at site (ft/1000)
Ground Snow Load (Pg) 43.7 psf
Soil or water load height (floor to top of wall max) 11.0 ft
Soil surcharge load height (above top of wall) 0.0 ft
Extra soil surcharge (Snow or other load) 532.0 psf
q tri = Ka W a 532.0
q rect = Ka W a 207.5
Case 3 (pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
Shear Coefficients (C s)
Case 3 or 4 (Triangular Load) Case 8 or 9 (Rectangular Load‐surcharge)
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 4,517.23 lb
Side Maximum 4,332.45 lb
Side Middle 3,233.67 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,679 lb
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
Short Wall
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Bottom Middle 2,748 lb Bottom Middle 1,769 lb
Side Maximum 1,786 lb Side Maximum 2,546 lb
Side Middle 1,786 lb Side Middle 1,447 lb
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 4,517.23 lb
Side Maximum 4,332.45 lb
Side Middle 3,233.67 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,679 lb
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 4,332 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,365 lb
Since the long wall is subject to simultaneous tensile force due to shear in the short side wall,
the allowable shear is given by:
ǿVc =0.85 x 2 (1 + Nu/500 Ag) (f' c)^0.5 b d
where Nu = tension in long wall due to shear in the short wall
Shear in short side wall:
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads (short wall)
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 4,332 lb
Nu = ‐1.7 x Vmax ‐7,365 lb
2
Ag = 120 in
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M x or z = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 15 pos 21
neg ‐61 neg ‐44
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 25 pos 81
neg ‐124 neg ‐181
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Mux = 167.66 in‐kips Muz = 185.59 in‐kips
Mux = ‐37.35 in‐kips Muz = ‐84.77 in‐kips
Exterior Face Long Wall
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0525
w = 0.0543 from Table A‐1 0.0523 0.0525 0.0532
0.2645
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.417 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0540 0.0543 0.0550
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.556 in /ft ACI 10.5.2 5 Bar Size
2
As min = 0.417 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.417 in2/ft
17
#5@17 in O.C.
Exterior Face Short Wall 0.433 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0582 Steel okay
w = 0.0603 from Table A‐1 0.0579 0.0582 0.0588
0.2846
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.4634 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0600 0.0603 0.0610
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.618 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.463 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.463 in2/ft
15
Interior Face Long Wall #5@15 in O.C.
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0117 0.491 in2/ft
w = 0.0118 from Table A‐1 Steel okay 0.0109 0.0117 0.0119
0.8040
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.091 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0110 0.0118 0.0120
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.121 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.121 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.121 in2/ft
60
#5@60 in O.C.
Interior Face Short Wall 0.123 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0266 Steel okay
w = 0.0270 from Table A‐1 0.0256 0.0266 0.0266
0.9644
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.2073 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0260 0.0270 0.0270
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.276 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.276 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.276 in2/ft
26
#5@26 in O.C.
(c) Design for Horizontal Bending Moments (determine horizontal steel) 0.283 in2/ft
For rectangular tanks, use factors found in Chapter 3 for b/a and c/a. Steel okay
For square tanks, use factors from Chapter 2 b/a = c/a.
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M y = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 21 pos 21
neg ‐44 neg ‐44
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 81 pos 81
neg ‐181 neg ‐181
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Muy = 185.59 in‐kips Muy = 185.59 in‐kips
Muy = ‐84.77 in‐kips Muy = ‐84.77 in‐kips
Is this analysis for water inside of structure? (1 = yes, 0 = no) 0
Factored Tension (Nu) = 1.65 X Nu 0 lb
2
Required Steel for tension = Nu/(0.9 fy) 0.000 in /ft
Franson Civil Engineers
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Design Detail
Concrete f'c = 5000 psi
Rebar Fy = 60000 psi
10 in
Unit Weight = 150 lb/ft³
1 ft
#4 @ 10 in (S&T)
#6 @ 10 in
13 ft
14 ft
#4 @ 10 in (S&T)
#4 @ 10 in
#7 @ 10 in (lapped dowels)
36 in
36 in
12 in
Heel Bars: #4 @ 7 in
1 ft
Toe Bars: #6 @ 12 in
1 ft
5.5 ft Footing S/T Bars: #4 @ 12 in
7.33 ft
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 1 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
0.9D + 1.6H
γ = 100 lb/ft³ 1.4D
φ = 30° 1.2D
c = 0 psf
12 ft
12 ft
13 ft
1 ft
γ = 100 lb/ft³
φ = 30°
c = 0 psf
Backfill Pressure
13 ft
13 ft
1 ft
4.33 ft
φ = 30°
-433.33 psf
c = 0 psf
12 ft
12 ft
13 ft
1 ft
200 lb/in
Lateral Earth Pressure
4 ft
-400 psf
Rankine Active Earth Pressure Theory
φ 30°
Ka = tan² 45° - = tan ² 45° - = 0.3333
2 2
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 2 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Passive Pressure
0.33 ft
300 psf
1 ft
12.5 lb/in
1 ft
γ = 100 lb/ft³
φ = 30°
c = 0 psf
Wall/Soil Weights
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 3 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Bearing Pressure
e = 11.22 in
2.73 ft
124.4 lb/in
136.7 psf
1026 psf
355.3 lb/in
Friction
F=μR = 0.350 355.3 lb / in = 124.4 lb / in
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 4 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 5 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 6 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-25 -19.17 -13.33 -7.5 -1.67 4.17 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 7 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 0 ft from base [Positive shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 0 ft from base [Negative shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 13 ft from base [Positive shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 13 ft from base [Negative shear]
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 8 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Main vertical stem bars (top end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 2.38 in
cb = 2.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.38 in + 0.0
= = 3.1667
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Dowels for vertical stem bars (top end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.88 in / 2 = 2.44 in
cb = 2.44 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.44 in + 0.0
= = 2.7857
db 0.88 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 0.88 in = 22.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
2nd curtain vertical bars (bottom end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψe = 1.0 uncoated hooked bars
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
fy 60000 psi
ldh = 0.02 ψe λ db = 0.02 1.0 1.0 0.5 in = 8.49 in
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ldh by the 0.7 multiplier of 12.5.3 a : ldh = 5.94 in
8 db = 8 0.5 in = 4.0 minimum limit, does not control
6 inch minimum controls
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 9 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 10 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
12 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi #6 @ 12 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 8.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 16.57 ft·k / ft
359.1 psf
φMn = 16.57 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = 11.92 ft·k / ft9 1026 psf
Shear Check (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1)
12 in
#6 @ 12 in 11.92 ft·k/ft
d 8.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0370
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
432.6 psf
εt = 0.0370 ≥ 0.004 9 1236 psf
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 16.57 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 11.92 ft·k / ft = 15.9 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0028
t sST 12 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0028 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu 11.92 ft·k / ft
= = 0.7198 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 16.57 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 3.00 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 3 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 3.38 in
cb = 3.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 3.38 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio 0.7198 per 12.2.5: ld = 10.99 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 19 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 11 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
12 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi #4 @ 7 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.03 in² / in 60000 psi 9.75 in - 0.4 in / 2 = 14.73 ft·k / ft
φMn = 14.73 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = 0.81 ft·k / ft 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
12 in
#4 @ 7 in
d 9.75 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0550
a / β1 0.4 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0550 ≥ 0.004 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
1.62 k/ft
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 14.73 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0.81 ft·k / ft = 1.08 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0028
t sST 12 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0028 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu 0.81 ft·k / ft
= = 0.0550 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 14.73 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 9.50 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 7 in / 2 = 3.5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.5 in / 2 = 2.25 in
cb = 2.25 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.25 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.5 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.5 in = 10.18 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio 0.0550 per 12.2.5: ld = 0.56 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 74 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 12 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.38 11.38
9.75 9.75
8.13 8.13
6.5 6.5
4.88 4.88
3.25 3.25
1.63 1.63
-640 psf
3.84 k/ft
0 0
-16 -12 -8 -4 0 0 1 2 3 4
Moment (ft·k/ft) Shear (k/ft)
-15.36 ft·k/ft
-640 psf
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 13 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-25 -19.17 -13.33 -7.5 -1.67 4.17 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 14 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 15 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 3 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 17.38 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 6.44 ft·k / ft = 8.58 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 13 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 0 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 0 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.06 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.85 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.56 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0184
a / β1 0.85 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0184 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 3 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 13 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 16 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Lap Splice Checks (ACI 318-05 12.14.2.3, 12.15.1, 12.15.2) - #6 lap with #7, from 0 ft to 3 ft (from stem base)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.88 in / 2 = 2.44 in
cb = 2.44 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.44 in + 0.0
= = 2.7857
db 0.88 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 0.88 in = 22.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
llap = 1.3 ld = 1.3 22.27 in = 28.96 in
llap_prov = 36 in ≥ llap = 28.96 in 9
1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 28.96 in = 5.7912 ≤ 6.0
strans = 0 in ≤ 1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 28.96 in = 5.79129
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 17 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
12 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi #6 @ 12 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 8.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 16.57 ft·k / ft
359.1 psf
φMn = 16.57 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = - 0 ft·k / ft 9 1026 psf
Shear Check (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1)
12 in
#6 @ 12 in
d 8.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0370
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
496.8 psf
εt = 0.0370 ≥ 0.004 9 1420 psf
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 16.57 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4/3 - 0 ft·k / ft = - 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0028
t sST 12 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0028 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu - 0 ft·k / ft
= = - 0.0 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 16.57 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 3.00 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 3 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 3.38 in
cb = 3.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 3.38 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio - 0.0000 per 12.2.5: ld = - 0 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 19 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 18 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
12 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi #4 @ 7 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.03 in² / in 60000 psi 9.75 in - 0.4 in / 2 = 14.73 ft·k / ft
φMn = 14.73 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = - 0 ft·k / ft 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
12 in
#4 @ 7 in
d 9.75 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0550
a / β1 0.4 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0550 ≥ 0.004 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
1.89 k/ft
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 14.73 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4/3 - 0 ft·k / ft = - 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0028
t sST 12 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0028 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu - 0 ft·k / ft
= = - 0.0 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 14.73 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 9.50 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 7 in / 2 = 3.5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.5 in / 2 = 2.25 in
cb = 2.25 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.25 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.5 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.5 in = 10.18 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio - 0.0000 per 12.2.5: ld = - 0 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 74 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 19 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
0 k/ft
-0 ft·k/ft
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 20 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-25 -19.17 -13.33 -7.5 -1.67 4.17 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 21 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
11.7
10.4
9.1
7.8
5.2
3.9
2.6
1.3
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 22 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 3 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 17.38 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 13 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 0 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 0 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.06 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.85 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.56 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0184
a / β1 0.85 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0184 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 3 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 13 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 23 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Lap Splice Checks (ACI 318-05 12.14.2.3, 12.15.1, 12.15.2) - #6 lap with #7, from 0 ft to 3 ft (from stem base)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.88 in / 2 = 2.44 in
cb = 2.44 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.44 in + 0.0
= = 2.7857
db 0.88 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 0.88 in = 22.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
llap = 1.3 ld = 1.3 22.27 in = 28.96 in
llap_prov = 36 in ≥ llap = 28.96 in 9
1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 28.96 in = 5.7912 ≤ 6.0
strans = 0 in ≤ 1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 28.96 in = 5.79129
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\Q...\Millsite Wall 4.rwd Page 24 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:03 PM
Millsite Outlet Vault
Wall 5 Design
Reinforced Concrete Tank - Valve vault design
(Based on design in PCA Publication ‐ Rectangular Concrete Tanks)
Use this spreadsheet for only one loading condition at a time, either:
(1) Tank is full of water with no external soil load; or
(2) Tank is empty with only soil as an external load
If number (1) is used, then there are no surcharge loads to be considered, surcharge only applies
to external soil load conditions.
Vault Dimensions
a ‐ Height (floor to top of wall) 12.916667 ft
b ‐ Long Side (span, middle support) 18.166667 ft
c ‐ Short Side (span, middle support) 11.916667 ft
b/a (long wall) 1.41
c/a (short wall) 0.92
Dead Loads for Roof
Roof Snow Load Calculation (From ASCE 7 pg. 90‐91) ASCE 7 = ASCE Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
Terrain Category C C for open terrain with scattered obstructions (pg 28‐29)
Exposure: Partial
Snow Exposure (Ce) 1.0 Table 7‐2 (pg 90) 1.0 for Terrain of C and Partial Exposure
Thermal Factor (Ct) 1.1 Table 7‐3 (pg 91) 1.2 for unheated structures
Snow Load Import (Is) 1.2 Table 7‐4 (pg 91) 1.2 for water treatment facilities and fireflow storage facilities
Snow load Calculation (From Utah Snow Load Calculation)
Base Snow Load (Po) 43 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE15A/htm/15A03_010700.htm
Change in Snow Load (S) 63 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r156/r156‐56.htm
Ao 6 Elev./1,000 Base Ground Snow Elev (Table 1608.1.2)
A 6.12 Elev./1,000 Elevation at site (ft/1000)
Ground Snow Load (Pg) 43.7 psf
Soil or water load height (floor to top of wall max) 11.0 ft
Soil surcharge load height (above top of wall) 0.0 ft
Extra soil surcharge (Snow or other load) 532.0 psf
q tri = Ka W a 532.0
q rect = Ka W a 207.5
Case 3 (pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
Shear Coefficients (C s)
Case 3 or 4 (Triangular Load) Case 8 or 9 (Rectangular Load‐surcharge)
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 4,517.23 lb
Side Maximum 4,332.45 lb
Side Middle 3,233.67 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,679 lb
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
Short Wall
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Bottom Middle 2,199 lb Bottom Middle 1,206 lb
Side Maximum 1,649 lb Side Maximum 1,554 lb
Side Middle 1,580 lb Side Middle 1,233 lb
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 3,404.75 lb
Side Maximum 3,203.45 lb
Side Middle 2,813.14 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 5,788 lb
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 4,332 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,365 lb
Since the long wall is subject to simultaneous tensile force due to shear in the short side wall,
the allowable shear is given by:
ǿVc =0.85 x 2 (1 + Nu/500 Ag) (f' c)^0.5 b d
where Nu = tension in long wall due to shear in the short wall
Shear in short side wall:
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads (short wall)
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 3,203 lb
Nu = ‐1.7 x Vmax ‐5,446 lb
2
Ag = 120 in
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M x or z = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 15 pos 10
neg ‐67 neg ‐28
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 48 pos 20
neg ‐96 neg ‐52
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Mux = 155.77 in‐kips Muz = 73.49 in‐kips
Mux = ‐53.59 in‐kips Muz = ‐27.25 in‐kips
Exterior Face Long Wall
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0488
w = 0.0503 from Table A‐1 0.0485 0.0488 0.0495
0.3109
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.387 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0500 0.0503 0.0510
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.516 in /ft ACI 10.5.2 5 Bar Size
2
As min = 0.387 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.387 in2/ft
19
#5@19 in O.C.
Exterior Face Short Wall 0.388 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0230 Steel okay
w = 0.0234 from Table A‐1 0.0226 0.0230 0.0236
0.4275
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.1801 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0230 0.0234 0.0240
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.240 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.240 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.240 in2/ft
30
Interior Face Long Wall #5@30 in O.C.
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0168 0.245 in2/ft
w = 0.0170 from Table A‐1 Steel okay 0.0159 0.0168 0.0168
0.9927
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.131 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0160 0.0170 0.0170
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.174 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.174 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.174 in2/ft
42
#5@42 in O.C.
Interior Face Short Wall 0.175 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0085 Steel okay
w = 0.0085 from Table A‐1 0.0080 0.0085 0.0090
0.5402
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.0657 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0080 0.0085 0.0090
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.088 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.088 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.088 in2/ft
84
#5@84 in O.C.
(c) Design for Horizontal Bending Moments (determine horizontal steel) 0.088 in2/ft
For rectangular tanks, use factors found in Chapter 3 for b/a and c/a. Steel okay
For square tanks, use factors from Chapter 2 b/a = c/a.
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M y = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 20 pos 10
neg ‐36 neg ‐36
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 90 pos 21
neg ‐135 neg ‐135
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Muy = 142.60 in‐kips Muy = 142.60 in‐kips
Muy = ‐89.82 in‐kips Muy = ‐27.96 in‐kips
Is this analysis for water inside of structure? (1 = yes, 0 = no) 0
Factored Tension (Nu) = 1.65 X Nu 0 lb
2
Required Steel for tension = Nu/(0.9 fy) 0.000 in /ft
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Wall 8 Design
Reinforced Concrete Tank - Valve vault design
(Based on design in PCA Publication ‐ Rectangular Concrete Tanks)
Use this spreadsheet for only one loading condition at a time, either:
(1) Tank is full of water with no external soil load; or
(2) Tank is empty with only soil as an external load
If number (1) is used, then there are no surcharge loads to be considered, surcharge only applies
to external soil load conditions.
Vault Dimensions
a ‐ Height (floor to top of wall) 10.833333 ft
b ‐ Long Side (span, middle support) 34.083333 ft
c ‐ Short Side (span, middle support) 8.4166667 ft
b/a (long wall) 3.15 4
c/a (short wall) 0.78 1
Dead Loads for Roof
Roof Snow Load Calculation (From ASCE 7 pg. 90‐91) ASCE 7 = ASCE Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
Terrain Category C C for open terrain with scattered obstructions (pg 28‐29)
Exposure: Partial
Snow Exposure (Ce) 1.0 Table 7‐2 (pg 90) 1.0 for Terrain of C and Partial Exposure
Thermal Factor (Ct) 1.1 Table 7‐3 (pg 91) 1.2 for unheated structures
Snow Load Import (Is) 1.2 Table 7‐4 (pg 91) 1.2 for water treatment facilities and fireflow storage facilities
Snow load Calculation (From Utah Snow Load Calculation)
Base Snow Load (Po) 43 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE15A/htm/15A03_010700.htm
Change in Snow Load (S) 63 psf Table 1608.1.2 (a) ‐ http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r156/r156‐56.htm
Ao 6 Elev./1,000 Base Ground Snow Elev (Table 1608.1.2)
A 6.12 Elev./1,000 Elevation at site (ft/1000)
Ground Snow Load (Pg) 43.7 psf
Soil or water load height (floor to top of wall max) 10.0 ft
Soil surcharge load height (above top of wall) 0.0 ft
Extra soil surcharge (Snow or other load) 532.0 psf
q tri = Ka W a 483.6
q rect = Ka W a 207.5
Case 3 (pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
Shear Coefficients (C s)
Case 3 or 4 (Triangular Load) Case 8 or 9 (Rectangular Load‐surcharge)
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 4,934.63 lb
Side Maximum 5,766.96 lb
Side Middle 2,216.44 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 8,389 lb
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
Short Wall
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Bottom Middle 1,676 lb Bottom Middle 1,011 lb
Side Maximum 1,257 lb Side Maximum 1,304 lb
Side Middle 1,205 lb Side Middle 1,034 lb
Total Shear
Bottom Middle 2,687.95 lb
Side Maximum 2,561.03 lb
Side Middle 2,238.91 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 4,570 lb
Allowable Shear Force
Wall Thickness 10 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness
7.6875 inches
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d
11,089 lbs Thickness okay
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 5,767 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 9,804 lb
Since the long wall is subject to simultaneous tensile force due to shear in the short side wall,
the allowable shear is given by:
ǿVc =0.85 x 2 (1 + Nu/500 Ag) (f' c)^0.5 b d
where Nu = tension in long wall due to shear in the short wall
Shear in short side wall:
V = Cs x q x a
for both rectangular and triangular loads (short wall)
Shear Triangular Load Shear Rectangular Load
Total Shear
Side Maximum 2,561 lb
Nu = ‐1.7 x Vmax ‐4,354 lb
2
Ag = 120 in
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M x or z = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 7 pos 12
neg ‐152 neg ‐19
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max Mx (pos and neg) Max Mz (pos and neg)
pos 9 pos 18
neg ‐433 neg ‐349
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Mux = 365.04 in‐kips Muz = 192.11 in‐kips
Mux = ‐11.38 in‐kips Muz = ‐20.78 in‐kips
Exterior Face Long Wall
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.1144
w = 0.1234 from Table A‐1 0.1141 0.1144 0.1149
0.3602
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.948 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.1230 0.1234 0.1240
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 1.264 in /ft ACI 10.5.2 6 Bar Size
2
As min = 0.948 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.948 in2/ft
11
#6@11 in O.C.
Exterior Face Short Wall 0.964 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0602 Steel okay
w = 0.0625 from Table A‐1 0.0597 0.0602 0.0607
0.4977
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.4805 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0620 0.0625 0.0630
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.641 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.480 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.480 in2/ft
22
Interior Face Long Wall #6@22 in O.C.
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0036 0.482 in2/ft
w = 0.0036 from Table A‐1 Steel okay 0.0030 0.0036 0.0040
0.5649
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.027 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0030 0.0036 0.0040
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.037 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.037 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.037 in2/ft
290
#6@290 in O.C.
Interior Face Short Wall 0.037 in2/ft
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0065 Steel okay
w = 0.0065 from Table A‐1 0.0060 0.0065 0.0070
0.5115
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.0501 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0060 0.0065 0.0070
2
As min = 0.326 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.067 in /ft ACI 10.5.2
2
As min = 0.067 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.067 in2/ft
158
#6@158 in O.C.
(c) Design for Horizontal Bending Moments (determine horizontal steel) 0.067 in2/ft
For rectangular tanks, use factors found in Chapter 3 for b/a and c/a. Steel okay
For square tanks, use factors from Chapter 2 b/a = c/a.
For square tanks use Chapter 2
Case 3 (starts on pg 2-17) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 2‐23) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 2‐47) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 9 (starts on pg 2‐53) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
For rectangular tanks use Chapter 3
Case 3 (starts on pg 3-25) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Free Top and Fixed Base (open top tanks)
Case 4 (starts on pg 3‐35) is Triangular Load (Soil and water) Hinged Top and Free Base
Case 7 (starts on pg 3‐65) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Free Top and Fixed Base
Case 8 (starts on pg 3‐75) is Rectangular Load (Soil Surcharge) Hinged Top and Fixed Base
M y = M Coef. X q a2/1000
Exterior Soil (‐1), Interior Water (1) ‐1
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Mu = 1.3 x 1.7 x Mx
(only use 1.3 if sanitary structure, otherwise use 1[input at beginning of spreadsheet])
Triangular Loads (Case 3 or 4)
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 17 pos 7
neg ‐56 neg ‐56
Rectangular Loads (Case 7 or 8 (rect tank), 8 or 9 (square tank))
Long Wall Short Wall
Max My (pos and neg) Max My (pos and neg)
pos 61 pos 8
neg ‐227 neg ‐227
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Long Wall Short Wall
Muy = 168.01 in‐kips Muy = 168.01 in‐kips
Muy = ‐47.07 in‐kips Muy = ‐10.88 in‐kips
Is this analysis for water inside of structure? (1 = yes, 0 = no) 0
Factored Tension (Nu) = 1.65 X Nu 0 lb
2
Required Steel for tension = Nu/(0.9 fy) 0.000 in /ft
Franson Civil Engineers
spSlab v3.60 © StructurePoint 11-05-2015, 03:55:28 PM
15 day trial license. Expires: Nov 20, 2015 at 15:46:09. Locking Code: 4-2BAFB. User: Franson, Franson-American Fork
\\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\SpSlab\Millsite Beam.slb Page 1
oooooo o o
oo oo oo oo
ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo
oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo
oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo
ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM)
=================================================================================================
spSlab v3.60 (TM)
A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of
Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems
Copyright © 2003-2013, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC
All rights reserved
=================================================================================================
Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot
be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input
for processing by the spSlab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes
any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared
by the spSlab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spSlab error free the
program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for
analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly,
STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any
analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spSlab
program.
==================================================================================================================
[2] DESIGN RESULTS
==================================================================================================================
Top Reinforcement
=================
Units: Width (ft), Mmax (k-ft), Xmax (ft), As (in^2), Sp (in)
Span Zone Width Mmax Xmax AsMin AsMax AsReq SpProv Bars
---- ------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
1 Left 1.50 0.00 0.500 0.000 19.794 0.000 0.000 ---
Midspan 1.50 0.00 9.000 0.000 19.794 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 1.50 0.00 17.500 0.000 19.794 0.000 0.000 ---
Bottom Reinforcement
====================
Units: Width (ft), Mmax (k-ft), Xmax (ft), As (in^2), Sp (in)
Span Width Mmax Xmax AsMin AsMax AsReq SpProv Bars
---- -------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
1 1.50 99.56 8.750 1.750 19.770 0.429 3.000 6-#5 *3
NOTES:
*3 - Design governed by minimum reinforcement.
Flexural Capacity
=================
Units: x (ft), As (in^2), PhiMn (k-ft)
Span x AsTop AsBot PhiMn- PhiMn+
---- --------- ----- ----- ------------ ------------
1 0.000 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
0.500 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
6.450 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
9.000 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
11.550 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
17.500 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
18.000 0.00 1.86 0.00 426.52
Deflections
===========
Section properties
------------------
Units: Ig, Icr, Ie (in^4), Mcr, Mmax (k-ft) ________________Load Level_______________
________Ie,avg_________ _________Dead_______ ______Dead+Live_____
Span Dead Dead+Live Zone Ig Icr Mcr Mmax Ie Mmax Ie
---- ----------- ----------- ------- ----------- ----------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- -----------
1 236196 236196 Midspan 236196 27083 386.61 74.00 236196 82.28 236196
Material Takeoff
================
Reinforcement in the Direction of Analysis
------------------------------------------
Top Bars: 0.0 lb <=> 0.00 lb/ft <=> 0.000 lb/ft^2
Bottom Bars: 112.6 lb <=> 6.26 lb/ft <=> 4.172 lb/ft^2
Stirrups: 0.0 lb <=> 0.00 lb/ft <=> 0.000 lb/ft^2
Total Steel: 112.6 lb <=> 6.26 lb/ft <=> 4.172 lb/ft^2
Concrete: 121.5 ft^3 <=> 6.75 ft^3/ft <=> 4.500 ft^3/ft^2
STRUCTUREPOINT - spColumn v4.81 (TM) Page 1
15 day trial license. Locking Code: 4-2BAFB. User: Franson, Franson 11/06/15
\\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\SpColumn\Millsite.col 08:30 AM
oooooo o
oo oo oo
ooooo oooooo oo ooooo oo oo oo o oooooooooo o ooooo
oo o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oooooo ooooo ooo ooooo o oo oo oo oo oo (TM)
==========================================================================================================
spColumn v4.81 (TM)
Computer program for the Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Sections
Copyright © 1988-2012, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC.
All rights reserved
==========================================================================================================
Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot be responsible for either
the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input for processing by the spColumn computer
program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the
correctness of the output prepared by the spColumn program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to
produce spColumn error free the program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only
responsibility for analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly,
STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any analysis, design
or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spColumn program.
STRUCTUREPOINT - spColumn v4.81 (TM) Page 2
15 day trial license. Locking Code: 4-2BAFB. User: Franson, Franson 11/06/15
\\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\SpColumn\Millsite.col 08:30 AM
General Information:
====================
File Name: \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\SpColumn\Millsite.col
Project: Millsite Outlet Vault
Column: Wall Corner Engineer: VH
Code: ACI 318-11 Units: English
Material Properties:
====================
f'c = 5 ksi fy = 60 ksi
Ec = 4030.51 ksi Es = 29000 ksi
Ultimate strain = 0.003 in/in
Beta1 = 0.8
Section:
========
Rectangular: Width = 19 in Depth = 19 in
Reinforcement:
==============
Bar Set: ASTM A615
Size Diam (in) Area (in^2) Size Diam (in) Area (in^2) Size Diam (in) Area (in^2)
---- --------- ----------- ---- --------- ----------- ---- --------- -----------
# 3 0.38 0.11 # 4 0.50 0.20 # 5 0.63 0.31
# 6 0.75 0.44 # 7 0.88 0.60 # 8 1.00 0.79
# 9 1.13 1.00 # 10 1.27 1.27 # 11 1.41 1.56
# 14 1.69 2.25 # 18 2.26 4.00
Layout: Rectangular
Pattern: All Sides Equal (Cover to transverse reinforcement)
Total steel area: As = 4.80 in^2 at rho = 1.33%
Minimum clear spacing = 5.81 in
8 #7 Cover = 2 in
Service Loads:
==============
Load Axial Load Mx @ Top Mx @ Bot My @ Top My @ Bot
No. Case kip k-ft k-ft k-ft k-ft
--- ---- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
1 Dead 25.04 -2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wind 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EQ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Snow 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Load Combinations:
==================
U1 = 1.400*Dead + 0.000*Live + 0.000*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 0.000*Snow
U2 = 1.200*Dead + 1.600*Live + 0.000*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 0.500*Snow
U3 = 1.200*Dead + 1.000*Live + 0.000*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 1.600*Snow
U4 = 1.200*Dead + 0.000*Live + 0.800*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 1.600*Snow
U5 = 1.200*Dead + 1.000*Live + 1.600*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 0.500*Snow
U6 = 0.900*Dead + 0.000*Live + 1.600*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 0.000*Snow
U7 = 1.200*Dead + 0.000*Live - 0.800*Wind + 0.000*EarthQuake + 1.600*Snow
STRUCTUREPOINT - spColumn v4.81 (TM) Page 3
15 day trial license. Locking Code: 4-2BAFB. User: Franson, Franson 11/06/15
\\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documents\SpColumn\Millsite.col 08:30 AM
Slenderness:
============
Sway Criteria:
--------------
X-axis: Nonsway column.
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Floor Section Analysis
Self Wall Pipe Valve Support Total Shear Delta Moment
Section 1 Load Load Load Load Load Load
Foot lbs/ft lbs/ft lbs/ft lbs/ft lbs/ft lbs/ft
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 ‐150 500 349.6 349.6 174.8 174.8
2 ‐150 ‐2225 497 ‐1878.29 ‐1528.69 ‐589.544 ‐414.744
3 ‐150 494 343.826 ‐1184.86 ‐1356.77 ‐1771.52
4 ‐150 491 340.939 ‐843.922 ‐1014.39 ‐2785.91
5 ‐150 488 338.052 ‐505.87 ‐674.896 ‐3460.81
6 ‐150 485 335.165 ‐170.705 ‐338.288 ‐3799.09
7 ‐150 482 332.278 161.573 ‐4.566 ‐3803.66
8 ‐150 ‐456 479 ‐126.609 34.964 98.2685 ‐3705.39
9 ‐150 ‐456 477 ‐129.496 ‐94.532 ‐29.784 ‐3735.17
10 ‐150 ‐456 474 ‐132.383 ‐226.915 ‐160.724 ‐3895.9
11 ‐150 ‐456 471 ‐135.27 ‐362.185 ‐294.55 ‐4190.45
12 ‐150 ‐456 468 ‐138.157 ‐500.342 ‐431.264 ‐4621.71
13 ‐150 465 314.956 ‐185.386 ‐342.864 ‐4964.58
14 ‐150 462 312.069 126.683 ‐29.3515 ‐4993.93
15 ‐150 459 309.182 435.865 281.274 ‐4712.65
16 ‐150 456 306.295 742.16 589.0125 ‐4123.64
17 ‐150 453 303.408 1045.568 893.864 ‐3229.78
18 ‐150 451 300.521 1346.089 1195.829 ‐2033.95
19 ‐150 448 297.634 1643.723 1494.906 ‐539.041
20 ‐150 ‐2225 445 ‐1930.25 ‐286.53 678.5965 139.555
21 ‐150 442 291.86 5.33 ‐140.6 ‐1.045
‐9880 9885
Delta
2.887
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Section 1
Shear
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
‐500
‐1000
‐1500
‐2000
Moment
1000
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
‐1000
‐2000
‐3000
‐4000
‐5000
‐6000
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Section 2
Shear
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
‐1000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
‐2000
‐3000
‐4000
Moment
5000
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
‐5000
‐10000
‐15000
‐20000
‐25000
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Section 3
Shear
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
‐500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐1000
‐1500
‐2000
‐2500
‐3000
Moment
6000
4000
2000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐2000
‐4000
‐6000
‐8000
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Section 4
Shear
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐1000
‐2000
‐3000
Moment
5000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐5000
‐10000
‐15000
‐20000
‐25000
‐30000
‐35000
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Section 5
Shear
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
‐1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐2000
‐3000
‐4000
‐5000
Moment
5000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
‐5000
‐10000
‐15000
‐20000
‐25000
‐30000
‐35000
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
Floor Design
Floor Slab Top Rebar Vmax Mmax
Concrete Strength (f'c) 5,000 psi Max 4040.7 lbs Max 4098 ft‐lbs
Steel Tensile Strength (fy) 60,000 psi Min ‐4215.3 lbs Min ‐32163 ft‐lbs
Concrete Thickness 12 inches
Bar Thickness 0.75 inches 49.176 in‐kips
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness 9.25 inches ‐385.956 in‐kips
Total Shear
Vmax 4,300 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,310 lb
Allowable Shear Force
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d 13,343 lbs
Thickness okay
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Mmax 396.00 in‐kips 33000
Mux = 673.20 in‐kips
Exterior Face Long Wall
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.1457
w = 0.1610 from Table A‐1 0.1457 0.1457 0.1465
0.0031
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 1.489 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.1610 0.1610 0.1620
2
As min = 0.392 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 1.986 in /ft ACI 10.5.2 6 Bar Size
2
As min = 1.489 in /ft Area of Steel Required 1.489 in2/ft
7
#6@7 in O.C.
1.515 in2/ft
Steel okay
Floor Slab Bottom Rebar
Concrete Strength (f'c) 5,000 psi
Steel Tensile Strength (fy) 60,000 psi
Concrete Thickness 12 inches
Bar Thickness 0.375 inches
d =thickness ‐ 2" cover ‐1/2 bar thickness 9.625 inches
Total Shear
Vmax 4,300 lb
Vu = 1.7 x Vmax 7,310 lb
Allowable Shear Force
Shear Capacity Vc = 0.85 x 2 x (f'c)^0.5 x12 x d 13,884 lbs
Thickness okay
Exterior (+) and Interior (‐) Face Loads
Mmax 48.00 in‐kips 4000
Mux = 81.60 in‐kips
Exterior Face Long Wall
Mu/(ǿ f'c b d2) = 0.0177
w = 0.0179 from Table A‐1 0.0168 0.0177 0.0178
Franson Civil Engineers
Millsite Outlet Vault
0.8609
2
As = w b d (f'c/fy) 0.165 in /ft Calculated As Requirement 0.0170 0.0179 0.0180
2
As min = 0.392 in /ft ACI 10.5.1
2
4/3 req'd As = 0.220 in /ft ACI 10.5.2 3 Bar Size
2
As min = 0.220 in /ft Area of Steel Required 0.220 in2/ft
12
#3@12 in O.C.
0.884 in2/ft
Steel okay
Franson Civil Engineers
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Design Detail
Concrete f'c = 5000 psi
Rebar Fy = 60000 psi
10 in
Unit Weight = 150 lb/ft³
1 ft
#4 @ 10 in (S&T)
16.5 ft
#6 @ 10 in
17.83 ft
#4 @ 10 in (S&T)
#4 @ 10 in
#9 @ 10 in (lapped dowels)
48 in
48 in
5.33 ft
16 in
Heel Bars: #6 @ 12 in
Toe Bars: #6 @ 12 in
4 ft 4 ft Footing S/T Bars: #4 @ 12 in
8.83 ft
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 1 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
1.2D + 0.5L
0.9D + 1.6H
γ = 100 lb/ft³
1.4D
φ = 30°
11.5 ft
1.2D
c = 0 psf
15.5 ft
16.83 ft
5.33 ft
γ = 100 lb/ft³
φ = 30°
c = 0 psf
Backfill Pressure
16.83 ft
16.83 ft
1 ft
5.61 ft
φ = 30°
11.5 ft
5.33 ft
333.7 lb/in
5.17 ft
Lateral Earth Pressure
-516.67 psf
Rankine Active Earth Pressure Theory
φ 30°
Ka = tan² 45° - = tan ² 45° - = 0.3333
2 2
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 2 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Passive Pressure
5.33 ft
5.33 ft
1.78 ft
1599 psf 355.1 lb/in
γ = 100 lb/ft³
φ = 30°
c = 0 psf
Wall/Soil Weights
133.2 lb/in
147.2 lb/in
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 3 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Bearing Pressure
e = 15.42 in
3.13 ft
349 lb/in
172.1 psf
2537 psf
997.2 lb/in
Friction
F=μR = 0.350 997.2 lb / in = 349 lb / in
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 4 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 5 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 6 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-40 -31.67 -23.33 -15 -6.67 1.67 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 7 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 0 ft from base [Positive shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 0 ft from base [Negative shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 16.5 ft from base [Positive shear]
Shear Capacity (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1) @ 16.5 ft from base [Negative shear]
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 8 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Main vertical stem bars (top end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 2.38 in
cb = 2.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.38 in + 0.0
= = 3.1667
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Dowels for vertical stem bars (top end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 1.13 in / 2 = 2.56 in
cb = 2.56 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 1.13 in = 31.58 in
40 c + Ktr 40 2.56 in + 0.0
F'c b 5000 psi
db 1.13 in
2nd curtain vertical bars (bottom end) - Development Length Calculation (ACI 318-05 12.2.3, 12.5)
ψe = 1.0 uncoated hooked bars
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
fy 60000 psi
ldh = 0.02 ψe λ db = 0.02 1.0 1.0 0.5 in = 8.49 in
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ldh by the 0.7 multiplier of 12.5.3 a : ldh = 5.94 in
8 db = 8 0.5 in = 4.0 minimum limit, does not control
6 inch minimum controls
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 9 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 10 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
16 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
#6 @ 12 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 12.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 24.49 ft·k / ft
φMn = 24.49 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = 15.2 ft·k / ft 9 2537 psf
1466 psf
Shear Check (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1)
16 in
d 12.63 in #6 @ 12 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0555
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0555 ≥ 0.004 9 3049 psf 1762 psf
1762 psf
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) 3049 psf
φMn = 24.49 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 15.2 ft·k / ft = 20.27 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0021
t sST 16 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0021 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu 15.2 ft·k / ft
= = 0.6209 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 24.49 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 3.00 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 3 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 3.38 in
cb = 3.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 3.38 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio 0.6209 per 12.2.5: ld = 9.48 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 55 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 11 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
16 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 13.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 26.47 ft·k / ft
φMn = 26.47 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = 16.8 ft·k / ft 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
16 in
d 13.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0602
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0602 ≥ 0.004 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
8.4 k/ft
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 26.47 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 16.8 ft·k / ft = 22.4 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0021
t sST 16 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0021 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu 16.8 ft·k / ft
= = 0.6348 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 26.47 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.30 more than 12 inches cast below - 13.25 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 2.38 in
cb = 2.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.38 in + 0.0
= = 3.1667
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.30 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 19.86 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio 0.6348 per 12.2.5: ld = 12.6 in
ld_prov = 56 in ≥ ld = 12.6 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 12 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.44 14.44
12.38 12.38
10.31 10.31
8.25 8.25
6.19 6.19
4.13 4.13
2.06 2.06
-826.67 psf
6.41 k/ft
0 0
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 0 1.75 3.5 5.25 7
Moment (ft·k/ft) Shear (k/ft)
-33.1 ft·k/ft
-826.67 psf
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 13 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-40 -31.67 -23.33 -15 -6.67 1.67 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 14 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 15 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 4 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 17.38 ft·k / ft < 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 13.52 ft·k / ft = 18.03 ft·k / ft
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 16.5 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 0 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 0 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.1 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 1.41 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.44 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0096
a / β1 1.41 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0096 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 4 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 16.5 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 16 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Lap Splice Checks (ACI 318-05 12.14.2.3, 12.15.1, 12.15.2) - #6 lap with #9, from 0 ft to 4 ft (from stem base)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 1.13 in / 2 = 2.56 in
cb = 2.56 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 1.13 in = 31.58 in
40 c + Ktr 40 2.56 in + 0.0
F'c b 5000 psi
db 1.13 in
llap = 1.3 ld = 1.3 31.58 in = 41.06 in
llap_prov = 48 in ≥ llap = 41.06 in 9
1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 41.06 in = 8.2111 > 6.0
strans = 0 in ≤ 6.0 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 17 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
16 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
#6 @ 12 in
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 12.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 24.49 ft·k / ft
φMn = 24.49 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = - 0 ft·k / ft 9 2537 psf
1466 psf
Shear Check (ACI 318-05 11.1.1, 11.3.1)
16 in
d 12.63 in #6 @ 12 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0555
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0555 ≥ 0.004 9 3537 psf
2044 psf
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 24.49 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4/3 - 0 ft·k / ft = - 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0021
t sST 16 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0021 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu - 0 ft·k / ft
= = - 0.0 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 24.49 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.0 12 inches or less cast below - 3.00 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 3 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 3.38 in
cb = 3.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 3.38 in + 0.0
= = 4.50
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 15.27 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio - 0.0000 per 12.2.5: ld = - 0 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 55 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 18 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
16 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
φMn = φ As fy d - a / 2 = 0.90 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi 13.63 in - 0.52 in / 2 = 26.47 ft·k / ft
φMn = 26.47 ft·k / ft ≥ Mu = - 0 ft·k / ft 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
16 in
d 13.63 in 19.6 ft·k/ft
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0602
a / β1 0.52 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0602 ≥ 0.004 9 (neglect bearing pressure)
9.8 k/ft
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1)
φMn = 26.47 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4/3 - 0 ft·k / ft = - 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Shrinkage and Temperature Steel (ACI 318-05 7.12.2)
AST 0.4 in² / in
ρST_prov = = = 0.0021
t sST 16 in 12 in
0.0018 60000 0.0018 60000
ρST_min = = = 0.0018
fy 60000 psi
ρST_min = 0.0018
ρST_prov = 0.0021 ≥ ρST_min = 0.0018 9
18 inch limit governs
sST_max = 18 in
sST = 12 in ≤ sST_max = 18 in 9
Development Check (ACI 318-05 12.12, 12.2.3)
Mu - 0 ft·k / ft
= = - 0.0 ratio to represent excess reinforcement
φMn 26.47 ft·k / ft
ψt = 1.30 more than 12 inches cast below - 13.25 inches
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 0.80 bars are #6 or smaller
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 12 in / 2 = 6 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 0.75 in / 2 = 2.38 in
cb = 2.38 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
cb + Ktr 2.38 in + 0.0
= = 3.1667
db 0.75 in
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.30 1.0 0.80 1.0
ld = db = 0.75 in = 19.86 in
40 2.5 40 2.5
F'c 5000 psi
Factoring ld by the excess reinforcement ratio - 0.0000 per 12.2.5: ld = - 0 in
12 inch minimum controls
ld_prov = 56 in ≥ ld = 12 in 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 19 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
0 k/ft
-0 ft·k/ft
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 20 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-40 -31.67 -23.33 -15 -6.67 1.67 10
Moment (ft·k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 21 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
14.85
13.2
11.55
9.9
6.6
4.95
3.3
1.65
0
-10 -6.67 -3.33 0 3.33 6.67 10
Shear (k/ft)
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 22 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 4 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 17.38 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Minimum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.5.1) @ 16.5 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
φMn = 0 ft·k / ft ≥ 4 / 3 Mu = 4 / 3 0 ft·k / ft = 0 ft·k / ft
Check is waived per ACI 10.5.3 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 0 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.1 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 1.41 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.44 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0096
a / β1 1.41 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0096 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 4 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
Maximum Steel Check (ACI 318-05 10.3.5) @ 16.5 ft from base [Stem in negative flexure]
F'c - 4000 5000 psi - 4000
β1 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.85 - 0.05 = 0.80
1000 1000
As fy 0.04 in² / in 60000 psi
a= = = 0.62 in
0.85 F'c 0.85 5000 psi
d 7.63 in
εt = 0.003 -1 = 0.003 -1 = 0.0265
a / β1 0.62 in / 0.80
εt = 0.0265 ≥ 0.004 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 23 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
Kevin Franson Millsite Vault Walls
FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS
Lap Splice Checks (ACI 318-05 12.14.2.3, 12.15.1, 12.15.2) - #6 lap with #9, from 0 ft to 4 ft (from stem base)
ψt = 1.0 bars are not horizontal
ψe = 1.0 bar not epoxy coated
ψs = 1.0 bars are #7 or larger
λ = 1.0 normal weight concrete
s/2 = 10 in / 2 = 5 in
cover + db / 2 = 2 in + 1.13 in / 2 = 2.56 in
cb = 2.56 in lesser of half spacing, ctr to surface
Ktr = 0.0 no transverse reinforcement
3. fy ψt ψe ψs λ 3. 60000 psi 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
ld = db = 1.13 in = 31.58 in
40 c + Ktr 40 2.56 in + 0.0
F'c b 5000 psi
db 1.13 in
llap = 1.3 ld = 1.3 31.58 in = 41.06 in
llap_prov = 48 in ≥ llap = 41.06 in 9
1 / 5 llap = 1 / 5 41.06 in = 8.2111 > 6.0
strans = 0 in ≤ 6.0 9
QuickRWall 4.0 (iesweb.com) \\Franson\users\vhogge\My Documen...\Millsite Wingwalls.rwd Page 24 of 24 Thursday 11/05/15 3:04 PM
APPENDIX C
Miscellaneous Information
RIKO Control Valve - Capacity Diagramm
Project Name: Millsite Dam Outlet Work
Project Note:
Project Date: 7/28/2014
User Name: Scipp
Pressure rate, PN: Class 150 (PN10) The 10" plunger valve used in the Millsite Dam
Nominal Valve Diameter, DN: 12" Rehabilitation design has a lower capacity and spill
out length than the 12" plunger valve shown here.
SZ 10-30% This detail has been included for reference purposes
System properties Bottom Outlet only.
Maximum Static upstream pressure: 110,00 feetWC
System properties
Minimum Static upstream pressure: 100,00 feetWC
Pipe diameter upstream side: 16"
Zeta value pipe upstream side: 0,00
Maximum Flowrate Control Valve: 21,84 CFS
Capacity in CFS
VAG-Armaturen GmbH is not liable for the correctness or completeness of the shown sizing result without knowledge of the hydraulic system in detail.
This calculation doesn’t displace a pressure surge calculation for your hydraulic system.
In case of any question about the sizing result, please get in touch with your contact person at VAG-Armaturen GmbH.
RIKO control valve - Spill out length P0=110,0 (feetWC)
Project Name: Millsite Dam Outlet Work
Project Note:
Project Date: 7/28/2014
User Name: Scipp
Pressure rate, PN: Class 150 (PN10) The 10" plunger valve used in the Millsite Dam
Rehabilitation design has a lower capacity and spill
Nominal Valve Diameter, DN: 12"
out length than the 12" plunger valve shown here.
SZ 10-30% This detail has been included for reference purposes
System properties Bottom Outlet only.
Maximum Static upstream pressure: 110,00 feetWC
System properties
Minimum Static upstream pressure: 100,00 feetWC
Pipe diameter upstream side: 16"
Zeta value pipe upstream side: 0,00
Maximum Flowrate Control Valve: 21,84 CFS
VAG-Armaturen GmbH is not liable for the correctness or completeness of the shown sizing result without knowledge of the hydraulic system in detail.
This calculation doesn’t displace a pressure surge calculation for your hydraulic system.
In case of any question about the sizing result, please get in touch with your contact person at VAG-Armaturen GmbH.
RIKO Control Valve - Capacity Diagramm
Project Name: Millsite Dam
Project Note: K=2,27 for upstreamside pipeline
Project Date: 8/15/2014
User Name: Scipp
Pressure rate, PN: Class 150 (PN10)
Nominal Valve Diameter, DN: 36"
E
System properties Bottom Outlet
Maximum Static upstream pressure: 115,00 feetWC
System properties
Minimum Static upstream pressure: 100,00 feetWC
Pipe diameter upstream side: 56"
Zeta value pipe upstream side: 2,27
Maximum Flowrate Control Valve: 309,60 CFS
Capacity in CFS
VAG-Armaturen GmbH is not liable for the correctness or completeness of the shown sizing result without knowledge of the hydraulic system in detail.
This calculation doesn’t displace a pressure surge calculation for your hydraulic system.
In case of any question about the sizing result, please get in touch with your contact person at VAG-Armaturen GmbH.
RIKO control valve - Spill out length P0=115,0 (feetWC)
Project Name: Millsite Dam
Project Note: K=2,27 for upstreamside pipeline
Project Date: 8/15/2014
User Name: Scipp
Pressure rate, PN: Class 150 (PN10)
Nominal Valve Diameter, DN: 36"
E
System properties Bottom Outlet
Maximum Static upstream pressure: 115,00 feetWC
System properties
Minimum Static upstream pressure: 100,00 feetWC
Pipe diameter upstream side: 56"
Zeta value pipe upstream side: 2,27
Maximum Flowrate Control Valve: 309,60 CFS
VAG-Armaturen GmbH is not liable for the correctness or completeness of the shown sizing result without knowledge of the hydraulic system in detail.
This calculation doesn’t displace a pressure surge calculation for your hydraulic system.
In case of any question about the sizing result, please get in touch with your contact person at VAG-Armaturen GmbH.
SIZING OF DISCHARGE CHANNEL
Bottom Slope, S 0.0154
Roughness, n 0.035 (stony, cobbles, pools, and eddy current)
Bottom Width, b 10 ft
Side Slope Factor, z 1.667
Water Depth, y 0.98 ft
Cross‐Sectional Area, A 11.35 ft^2
Wetted Perimeter, P 13.79 ft
Flow, Q 52.6 cfs Operating Discharge is 52.6 cfs (Source: Irrigation Company)
Velocity, V 4.64 ft/sec
Bottom Slope, S 0.0154
Roughness, n 0.035 (stony, cobbles, pools, and eddy current)
Bottom Width, b 10 ft
Side Slope Factor, z 1.667
Water Depth, y 2.43 ft
Cross‐Sectional Area, A 34.20 ft^2
Wetted Perimeter, P 19.46 ft
Flow, Q 263 cfs Required Canal Discharge is 263 cfs (Source: Irrigation Company)
Velocity, V 7.69 ft/sec
Bottom Slope, S 0.0154
Roughness, n 0.035 (stony, cobbles, pools, and eddy current)
Bottom Width, b 10 ft
Side Slope Factor, z 1.667
Water Depth, y 2.83 ft
Cross‐Sectional Area, A 41.63 ft^2
Wetted Perimeter, P 21.00 ft
Flow, Q 346.9 cfs Maximum Valve Discharge is 346.9 cfs (Source: Dam Safety Design)
Velocity, V 8.33 ft/sec
Millsite Outlet Works Extension
Thrust Block Analysis
7/2/2014
Design Inputs:
Static Pressure(P) = 50 psi 𝜃
2PAsin
Thrust Block Soil Bearing Area = 2
Allowable Soil Strength = 2000 psf
𝑞𝑎
Additional Safety Factor = 2.5
Design Outputs:
2
Thrust Block Soil Bearing Area (ft )
Diameter Pipe Area Tees, Deadends, Bend Angle (Degrees) Thrust Block Thickness = 3 ft
2
(in) (in ) Valves 90 45 22.5 11.25 Required Volume (cuyd)
8 50 3.1 4.4 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1
10 79 4.9 6.9 3.8 1.9 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1
12 113 7.1 10.0 5.4 2.8 1.4 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2
24 452 28.3 40.0 21.6 11.0 5.5 3.1 4.4 2.4 1.2 0.6
36 1018 63.6 90.0 48.7 24.8 12.5 7.1 10.0 5.4 2.8 1.4
42 1385 86.6 122.5 66.3 33.8 17.0 9.6 13.6 7.4 3.8 1.9
54 2290 143.1 202.4 109.6 55.8 28.1 15.9 22.5 12.2 6.2 3.1
Reducers
Thrust Block
Soil Bearing
D1 D2 Area Diff Area
(in) (in) (in2) (ft2)
8 12 63 3.9
12 24 339 21.2
42 54 905 56.5
40 42 129 8.1
36 42 368 23.0
Thrust Block Design
Vault Piping
Pipe Properties
2
Static Pressure = 50 lb/in
3
Flow = 400 ft /s
Penstock Diameter = 54 in
2
Penstock Area = 15.89625 ft
Velocity = 25.16 ft/s
Bend Angle = 90.0 °
Fluid Properties
Density (ρ) = 1.94 lbs*s2/ft4
2
Gravity (g) = 32.174 ft/s
Px = 59 lb/in2
2
Py = 59 lb/in
PR = 83 lb/in2
Required Concrete
Friction Coefficient = 0.5 ACI 318 11.6.4.3
3
Concrete Weight = 120 lb/ft Low estimate