Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Accurate Level
Measurement Solutions for
Full Containment Tanks
LNG and Fractionated Gas Applications
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Abstract
The storage of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and heavier gaseous hydrocarbons such as
ethane presents certain challenges for inventory measurement technology. This white
paper looks at the need for accurate level measurement solutions to support inventory
management and safety functions in full containment storage tanks. It also reveals the
characteristics of the tanks, in which the liquefied gases are stored, and examines the
challenges these applications present to accurate level measurement. The drawbacks
of traditional measurement methods are explained before we describe the benefits of
the latest non-contacting radar technology and the most appropriate tank gauging
solution for these cryogenic applications.
The liquefaction of natural gas into LNG allows it to be stored, transported, and traded across the world.
1
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Storage tanks
After processing and fractionation have taken place, the liquefied gases are stored in
cryogenic or refrigerated full containment tanks. From there, they can be transported
overseas in specially designed carriers or overland in road tankers or rail cars to areas
that are not served by pipelines. After being transported, the liquefied gas will be
regasified at the terminal or grid to which it is delivered. Full containment tanks
typically have a capacity of between 30,000 and 200,000 cubic meters with an inner
liquid containment steel tank, an outer concrete (or steel) tank for secondary
containment control, and thermal insulation between the two to minimize liquid
boil-off when stored.
LNG can be distributed via trailer and used as a clean energy alternative in industry processes.
2
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Measurement challenges
Establishing the level and temperature of liquefied gas in full containment tanks
presents various challenges for measurement technology. These tanks are large
structures, which means the required measurement range can be 40 meters (131 feet)
or more. This makes accuracy difficult to achieve. Also, these closed tanks are not
opened during operation and are normally not accessed for maintenance purposes
during their entire life cycle. This means reliability is crucial, and redundancy is a vital
demand for level measurements in these applications. A further challenge is presented
by the inner structure of these tanks.
A standard storage tank has only one vapor space, but in full containment tanks there
are two different vapor spaces - one outside the tank's fixed suspended deck and one
inside it. These two large vapor spaces have different temperatures, and for inventory
purposes this needs to be considered when calculating the mass equivalent within the
vapor spaces.
3
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
4
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Non-contacting radar
Owners need to choose intelligent solutions that help maximize a tank's output while
minimizing operating and maintenance costs, to realize a quick return on investment.
The modern approach involves using non-contacting radar to provide precise level
measurement. This is the fastest growing tank gauging technology across the world in
cryogenic applications.
Non-contacting radar level gauges use microwaves to measure the liquid level. These
devices have no moving parts and do not touch the liquid, which helps to ensure
maintenance requirements are minimal. Most radar gauges cannot overcome the
difficulties associated with vapor spaces, dielectric constant, and long measuring
distance, which cryogenic applications present. However, the best technology gauges
can provide highly accurate measurements at distances of over 55 meters (180 feet),
and furthermore, measurements can be verified with the tank in operation. These
gauges use Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) technology for optimum
signal strength. A 4-inch still-pipe guides the radar signal, resulting in a strong,
undisturbed echo from the surface of the liquid. The radar sweep is controlled by a
crystal oscillator to achieve 0.5 millimeters (0.020 inches) level precision. Using a
precise radar level gauge can deliver a 180 percent reduction in volume uncertainty
over traditional methods.
These devices are suitable for use in cryogenic applications as their electronics are
housed within the transmitter head outside the tank, and there is a specific antenna
option for LNG/NGL usage that can function in such an extreme environment. These
gauges can boast impressive reliability and accuracy with mean time between failures
(MTBF) for critical parts measured in decades.
For a tank that may not be opened for years, reliability is critical. Radar technology is often preferred. In addition, to maximize
availability, a common solution is to have triple redundancy for all measurement instrumentation.
5
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Performing proof-tests from the control room is much quicker and safer compared to climbing high tanks.
6
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
There is a misconception that standards require the technology used for the OPS to be
different from the technology used for the BPCS. This is typically referred to as diverse
separation or diverse redundancy. It is in fact legitimate to use the same technology for
both. This is known as identical separation, and non-contacting radar level gauges are
increasingly becoming the preferred technology.
IEC 61511-2, which provides best safety practices for the implementation of a modern
SIS, reads: “Separation between the SIS and the BPCS may use identical or diverse
separation.” Identical separation would mean using the same technology for both the
BPCS and SIS whereas diverse separation would mean using different technologies
from the same or different manufacturer. Compared with identical separation, which
helps against random failures, diverse separation offers the additional benefit of
reducing the probability of systematic faults affecting multiple channels at the same
time and/or from the same cause and hence reduces correlated failure of multiple
channels. Identical separation between the SIS and BPCS may have some advantages in
design and maintenance because it reduces the likelihood of maintenance errors. This
is particularly the case if diverse devices are to be selected which have not been used
before within the user's organization.
In other words, diverse and identical separation are both valid options, but they provide
different benefits. There is a growing insight that reducing maintenance and similar
“handling errors” is critical — by some estimates, 75 percent of accidents in industry are
traceable to organizational and human factors. In this context, the Buncefield incident
provides a case in point. Buncefield had redundant and diverse technology for overfill
protection, but the high-level alarm was inoperable due to human error. It had been
taken offline for testing and had not been reinstalled properly — it was no longer
functioning. It can be argued that diverse separation introduces extra complexity and
increases the likelihood of human error, as personnel need to learn about installing,
configuring, and proof-testing two different technologies rather than just one.
7
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
8
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
9
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Multi-input temperature transmitter with a 4-wire calibrated Multi-input temperature transmitter with a temperature
multiple spot temperature sensor sensor for cool-down and leak detection
10
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
A level, temperature, and density (LTD) gauge that potentially samples hundreds of
data points will provide a detailed and accurate temperature and density profile. Such
profiling makes it possible to detect stratification in an LNG tank and help to prevent
roll-over incidents. By monitoring all relevant data, the potential development of
stratification can be controlled, and action taken to avoid a roll-over.
To collect this data and power the field devices, tank gauging systems are connected to
a tank hub. The hub also sends measured data to the control room via a field
communication unit.
11
Accurate Level Measurement Solutions for Full Containment Tanks White Paper
Figure 11. Inventory Management Software for Operator Interface and Reports
Conclusion
With cryogenic liquids stored in huge full containment tanks, which may not be
opened for years, tank gauging systems must be able to deliver reliable and accurate
level measurement throughout the entire service life of the tank. Solutions based on
the latest non-contacting radar technology offer a range of benefits compared to
traditional methods, including highly accurate measurements at long range, remote
proof-testing capability, and the ability to overcome the difficulties associated with
vapor spaces and dielectric constant. Therefore, it is little wonder that non-contacting
radar has become the fastest growing level measurement technology in cryogenic tank
gauging applications.
12
White Paper
For more information on Emerson's tank gauging solutions for cryogenic applications, visit
Emerson.com/RosemountLNG.
Twitter.com/Rosemount_News
Asia Pacific Regional Office
Emerson Automation Solutions
1 Pandan Crescent
Singapore 128461 Facebook.com/Rosemount
+65 6777 8211
+65 6777 8211 Youtube.com/user/RosemountMeasurement
Specialist-OneLevel.RMT-AP@Emerson.com
RTGMEA.Sales@Emerson.com