PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Date 2020-06-22

Words 1000

27% 73% Characters 5893

Plagiarised Unique

Content Checked For Plagiarism

capture has been made with or without a warrant, the individual capturing is required, immediately and subject to the arrangements in regards
to bail, to deliver the captured individual before the Magistrate or official responsible for a police headquarters having ward for the situation
under Sections 56 and 76 of CrPC. (4) Right to counsel a Legal Practitioner: - Both the Constitution and the arrangements of the CrPC
separately perceive the privilege of each captured individual to counsel a lawful specialist of his decision under Article 22(1) and Section 303
of CrPC. The correct starts from the snapshot of capture. The discussion with the legal counselor might be within the sight of the cop yet not
inside his hearing. (5) Right of an arrested Indigent Person to free legal aid and to be informed about it: - In Khatri v. State of Bihar , the
Supreme Court has held that the State is under a constitutional mandate (implicit in Article 21) to provide free legal aid to an indigent accused
person, and that this constitutional obligation to provide legal aid does not arise only when the trial commences but also when the accused is
for the first time produced before the Magistrate as also when he is remanded from time to time. However, this constitutional right of an
indigent accused to get free legal aid may prove to be illusory unless he is promptly and duly informed about it by the court when he is
produced before it. The Supreme Court has therefore cast a duty on all Magistrates and courts to inform the indigent accused about his right
to get free legal aid. (6) Right to be inspected by a Medical specialist: - If any captured individual charges, when he is created before a
Magistrate or whenever during the time of his confinement in guardianship, that the assessment of his body will bear the cost of proof which
will discredit the commission by him of any offense or which will set up the commission by some other individual of any offense against his
body, at that point the Magistrate, on the solicitation of the captured individual, is required to coordinate the assessment of his body by an
enrolled clinical professional. Nonetheless, the Magistrate need not provide such a guidance in the event that he thinks about that the
solicitation for clinical assessment has been made by the captured individual with the end goal of vexation or delay or for crushing the finishes
of equity under Section 54 CrPC. As indicated by the bearing of Supreme Court, the captured blamed individual must be educated by the
Magistrate about his entitlement to be medicinally analyzed as far as Section 54 CrPC. OUTCOME OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS RELATING TO ARREST Rebelliousness of the provisions of arrest will bring about a few genuine outcomes on violators. A
preliminary won't be void just on the grounds that the arrangements identifying with capture have not been completely consented to. In spite of
the fact that the lawlessness or inconsistency in making a capture would not vitiate the preliminary of the captured individual, it would be very
material if such an individual is indicted on a charge of protection from or escape from legal authority. On the off chance that the capture is
illicit, the individual who is by and large so captured can practice the privilege of private barrier as per, and subject to, the arrangements
contained in Sections 96 to 106 of the IPC. On the off chance that the community worker having power to make captures purposely practices
that expert in negation of law and impacts an illicit capture, he can be indicted for an offense under Section 220 of the IPC. Aside from this
extraordinary arrangement, any individual who illicitly captures another is culpable under Section 342 of the IPC for wrongful confinement. In
the event that the capture is unlawful, it is such a bogus detainment, and the captured individual in qualified for guarantee harms from the
individual who made such a capture. CUSTODY: MEANING AND ITS DIFFERENCE FROM ARREST Simply reconnaissance or limitation on
the development of the individual concerned is called custody. In criminal law, custody is the second phase of the arrest. Various occasions it
happens that when a man is captured for any unlawful demonstration or doubt of bad behavior, the police will in all likelihood be not able to
complete the assessment inside 24 hours and present the person before the official. Starting at this moment, it is basic to keep the person
from the overall population, for the security of the overall population and the security of the individual himself. It is similarly fundamental that
he is accessible for additional examination and request and doesn't dodge the law. In such a case, the individual may be kept in the
accompanying custody. The word 'Arrest' and 'Custody' are not interchangeable. n every arrest there is custody but vice versa is not true.
What amounts to arrest is laid down by the legislature in Section 46. Whether the arrest to be made is with a warrant or without the warrant, it
is necessary that in making such an arrest the police officer or other person making the same actually touches or confines the body of the
person to be arrested unless there be a submission to custody by word or action . Arrest is a mode of formally taking a person in police
custody. Whereas ‘custody’ merely denotes surveillance or restriction on the movement of the person concerned. A person may be taken in
custody completely or even partially. The concept of being in custody is, therefore, different from that of a formal arrest. Thus, it would be seen
that in every arrest there is custody but the converse is not true and as such, arrest and custody are not synonymous terms. TYPES OF
CUSTODIES POLICE CUSTODY:- When following to the receipt of a data/objection/report by police about a wrongdoing, an official of police
captures the

Matched Source

Similarity 13%
Title: Microsoft Word - B-1, Unit-2 | 1.6 RIGHTS OF ARRESTED PERSON
o right to be informed of the grounds for arrest o right to be informed of right to bail o right to be produced before a magistrate without delay
o right to consult a legal practitioner o right of an arrested indigent person to free legal aid and to be informed about it o right to be
examined by...

http://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/38902/1/Unit-2.pdf

Similarity 19%
Title: Prisoners Rights Rights of Arrested Person in India
in khatri(ii) v. state of bihar, the supreme court has held that the state is under a constitutional mandate (implicit in article 21) to provide
free legal aid to an indigent accused person, an and the constitutional obligation to provide free legal aid does not arise only when the trial
commences...

http://kanoon.nearlaw.com/2017/10/20/prisoners-rights-arrested-person-india/

Similarity 9%
Title: Arrest Proceedures and Rights | Arrest | Bail
of the accused at trial; the second is to prevent him from committing a.arrest, unless the person sought to be arrested submits to the
process and goes with the arresting officer.trial prisoner even in extreme cases and intimate the court, so that the court may consider the
circumstances and issue...

https://www.scribd.com/document/248307825/Arrest-Proceedures-and-Rights

Similarity 7%
Title: Khatri And Others vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 December, 1980
the magistrate or the sessions judge before whom the accused appears must be held to be under an obligation to inform the accused that
if he is unable to engage the services of a lawyer on account of poverty or indigence, he is entitled to obtain free legal services at the cost
of the state.

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1122133/

Similarity 3%
Title: Judicial custody and police custody – recent trends
The words "custody" and "arrest" are not synonymous. It is true that in every arrest there is custody but vice versa is not true. Mere
utterance of words or gesture or flickering of eyes does not amount to arrest. Actual seizure or touch of a person's body with a view to
arresting is necessary.
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/sites/default/files/fct.pdf

Similarity 5%
Title: Arrest | Arrest | Arrest Warrant | A Police Officer (Sections 41, & 42)
whether the arrest to be made is with a warrant or without the warrant, it is necessary that in making such an arrest the police officer or
other person making the same actually touches or confines the body of the person to be arrested unless there be a submission to custody
by word or...

https://www.scribd.com/document/112106579/Arrest

Similarity 5%
Title: Difference/ Distinction between Arrest and Custody?
arrest is a mode of formally taking a person in police custody. whereas ‘custody ‘ merely denotes surveillance or restriction on the
movement of thean arrest is the act of apprehending a person and taking them into custody, usually because they have been suspected of
committing or planning a...

https://www.ourlegalworld.com/difference-between-arrest-and-custody/

Similarity 3%
Title: What are the Main Difference between Arrest and Custody?
the concept of being in custody is, therefore, different from that of a formal arrest.thus a person who was alleged to have been in
possession of an illicit arm sometime in the past cannot be called presently an accused or a suspect of that offence and hence cannot be
so arrested.

https://www.shareyouressays.com/knowledge/what-are-the-main-difference-between-arrest-and-custody/116674