Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 53

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

OFFICIAL BUILDING

Client:
Xxxxx

Consultant:
Roshan Kejariwal
NEC No-14859 civil A

Jan,2020

1|Page
`Table of Contents

1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................3
1.1. General..............................................................................................................................3
DESIGN BRIEF...................................................................................................................................4
Design Parameters...........................................................................................................................5
Cement:....................................................................................................................................5
1.2. Design Loads......................................................................................................................7
Proposed Approach to Structural Analysis......................................................................................8
Analysis Method adopted for ETABS model....................................................................................9
1.3. Materials Properties........................................................................................................10
2. Analysis and Design of Structure...........................................................................................11
2.1. Finite Element Modeling.................................................................................................11
2.2 1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation............................................................................14
2.3 Structure Results....................................................................................................................0
2.4 Story Results...........................................................................................................................0
2.5 Modal Results.........................................................................................................................1
2.6 Model participating mass ratios.............................................................................................1
2.7 Load Combinations.................................................................................................................2
2.2. Beam and Column Design..................................................................................................4
2.3. Foundation Design.............................................................................................................4
2.4. Slab Design.........................................................................................................................5
3. Conclusion and Recommendation...........................................................................................5
4. Annexes....................................................................................................................................6

2|Page
1. Introduction
1.1. General

The structure is RC framed building. It is rectangular in plan. It has truss at its top.

Assumptions

Client
Building Type Public
Location
Type of Structure RCC Framed Structure
Stories 5
Story Height 3.3m
Soil Type II(IS 1893_Part 1: 2002)
Seismic Zone Factor, Z 0.36
Importance Factor, I 1
Response reduction 5
factor,
SeismicRcoefficient, Ah 0.09
550 mm X 550 mm ,400mm
Column Size
x400mm, 400mmdia

Tie Beam: 230 mm X 350mm,


Floor Beam: 400mm X
Beam size
500mm , sec beam 230x
400mm
Slab Thickness 125 mm
Live Load in rooms 3kN/m2
Live load in Verandah 3kN/m2
Live load in Staircase 4kN/m2
Reinforcement grade Fe500
main bars
Grade of Concrete M25 for all structural concrete
250KN/m2(provided by client,
Soil Bearing Capacity to be verified before
construction)

DESIGN BRIEF

3|Page
1. The building is RCC framed structure.

2. Structural Scheme: It will comprise of RCC foundations, columns, RCC beams & slabs.

3. Performance Criteria:

a. Maximum horizontal deflection of the building at terrace level is proposed to be


limited to height / 500 for IS code defined wind

b. Maximum horizontal deflection of the building at terrace level is proposed to be


limited to height / 250 for IS code defined seismic forces.

c. Deflections of individual horizontal members for Dead Load + Live Load condition
shall be limited to span / 350.

4. The following combination of structural members will be used to form the framework of
the Building

Foundation The concrete grade is planned as M25 with Reinforcing Steel of Fe 500
grade. Raft footings will be designed as required at 3.6 m depth where
there is basement and 2m depth where there is no basement.

Floor Slabs would act as diaphragms resisting lateral loads, slabs will be designed
only for gravity loads.

Beams RCC beams with M25grade will be used, which will create a frame
connecting all columns / walls on the periphery of the floor plate. The
Reinforcing Steel will be of Fe 500 grade.

Columns RCC column construction will be adopted with M25 in general with
Reinforcing Steel of Fe 500 grade.

4|Page
5. Standard Ductile detailing will be adopted for columns, beams considering following
criteria :

1. End zones for beams

2. End zones for columns

3. Columns bars lapped at mid height.

Design Parameters

Materials of Construction

The building is RCC framed structure with beam – column moment resisting frames, floor slabs
being used as diaphragms / plates in redistribution of lateral forces.
Concrete

The minimum Grade of Concrete in all RCC structural members shall be M25

Concrete of Grade M: 20, M: 15 & M: 10 shall be used in filling, plum concrete, leveling courses
and other non-structural items.

Density of reinforced concrete is assumed as 25 KN/cu.m

Minimum cement content, water cement ratio etc. shall conform to IS 456:2000 provisions for
durability and strength criteria.

As far as possible, Concrete production shall be with least environment impact.

Cement:

Ordinary Portland Cement of minimum grade 53 confirming to IS 8112 and IS 12269 is specified
for concrete grades ranging from M: 10 to M: 50.

Aggregates:

The sizes of coarse aggregates conform to IS 383. Nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate is
20 mm, suitably graded as per the requirement of mix design.

The fine aggregates conform to the specifications of IS 515.

Admixtures & Additives

5|Page
Use of fly ash is recommended as per provisions of I.S.456 – 2000.

Micro silica in slurry or powder form may be used as per provisions of I.S.456 – 2000.

Approved admixture can be used to enhance performance of Concrete, especially for controlled
retardation and flowing characteristics of the concrete for desired level of compaction.

Water:

Mixing Water shall conform to IS 456: 2000.

Reinforcement
High yield strength deformed bars conforming to IS 1786 with fy = 500 N/sq.mm shall be used.
Structural steel

All structural steel shall confirm to IS: 2062 with minimum yield strength of 250 N/sq.mm.

Wherever required, structural steel of grade Fe 310 or Fe 350 will be specified.

All primary members of structural steel shall be treated for fire rating of 2 hours.

6|Page
1.2. Design Loads

Live Load (Based on IS 875_Part 2: 1987):

Rooms : 3kN/m2

Verandah : 3 kN/m2

Staircase : 4kN/m2

Roof : 2kN/m2

Dead load (Based on IS 875_Part 1: 1987):

Unit weight of Brick : 20kN/m3

Unit Weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Earthquake Load (Based on IS 1893: 2002 part 1):

IS 1893:2002 Response Spectrum


1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
IS 1893-DBE
Sa/g

0.5
IS-1893-MCE
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time Period, Sec.

Figure 1-1 IS 1893: 2002 Response Spectrum

The Design Base Shear is given by


V b =Z /2×I /R×S a /g×W

Sa / g is the normalized Response Spectrum value for the structure which is the function of the fundamental time period of
vibration of the structure and the type of the founding soil.

7|Page
W is the Seismic Weight of the building, which will be calculated in accordance with the relevant
clause in the IS1893: 2002.

Since the structure is a R.C.C. structure, a damping value of 5% will be considered.

Model analysis / Space frame analysis of the structure will be carried out using Response
Spectrum method

Assumptions:
Importance factor, I = 1
Response Reduction Factor, R = 5
Soil Type = Type II (Medium soil)

Proposed Approach to Structural Analysis

The building will be predominantly planned with a structural system involving R.C.C slabs,
beams, columns having moment resistant frames as a RCC framed structure.

After preliminary sizing of various structural members, a computer model of the structural
frame of the building will be generated for carrying out computer analysis for the effects of
vertical and lateral load that are likely to be imposed on the structure.

The building structure will be analyzed ETABS software which is thoroughly tested, validated
and recognized internationally by several organizations and is well suited for the analysis of
R.C.C building systems.

The analysis problem will be modeled using geometrical dimensions, member properties and
member-node connectivity. The relevant eccentricities in member connectivity will also be
modeled in the analysis problem as may be necessary. Variation in material grades (since
concrete of different grades being used) will also be considered while modeling.

Wind load derivations will be carried out using coefficients / factors in accordance with the
relevant codes.

The seismic loads will be derived from the results of analysis of the structure in accordance
with the Indian Code IS: 1893-2002.

The permissible values of the load factors and stresses will be utilized within the purview of the
above-mentioned Standards.

8|Page
Analysis Method adopted for ETABS model

Floor geometry shall be developed for building as per final GA drawings.

Vertical members will be connected from floor to floor to assemble and complete the space
frame.

Preliminary sectional properties will be assigned to all the structural elements.

Connection eccentricities will be introduced whenever necessary.

All columns will be treated as fixed at the foundation level.

The floor slabs will be modeled/ introduced as horizontal diaphragms using appropriate
methods.

Appropriate torsion / moment releases will be given wherever required.

Appropriate grades of concrete as mentioned in the parameters in this report will be assigned.

Gravity loads (Dead load and Live load) will be applied to all the respective areas as per the
location and occupancy. Allowances in terms of Live-Load reductions as per no. of floors shall be
duly considered strictly in accordance with the codes.

Wind load analysis will be carried out using procedures mentioned in IS: 875 (Part-3).

Seismic analysis will be carried out independently using STATIC analysis procedures mentioned
in IS -1893:2002

The computer analysis will evaluate individual internal member forces, reactions at foundation
level and deflection pattern of the entire structure. It will also evaluate the deflection pattern of
the individual members.

This data generated using this analysis model, will then be used to verify adequacy of the
member sizes adopted and after further iterations arrive at the most appropriate reinforcement
design of the structural members. Some re-runs of the analysis program will be required for
arriving at the optimum structural space frame characteristics that satisfy the strength and
stability criteria in all respects. The architects and the services consultants will be duly informed
of any schematic changes required to be carried out for making the structural system fully

9|Page
compatible with the wind/earthquake codes, so that they can accommodate the changes in the
overall planning of the building.

Space frame analysis will be carried out for gravity loads, wind loads, seismic loads and all
combinations thereof.

1.3. Materials Properties

Grade of concrete : M25

Grade of Steel for main bars : Fe500

Grade of steel for stirrups : Fe500

Unit weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Unit Weight of Steel : 78.5 kN/m3

Unit weight of brick masonry : 20kN/m3

Young’s modulus of concrete, E : 5000 √ f ck =22360 N /mm2

Poisson’s ratio for concrete : 0.2

Poisson’s ratio for steel : 0.3

10 | P a g e
2. AnalYsis and Design of Structure

2.1. Finite Element Modeling

Finite element model has been prepared in ETABS 2016. Beams and frames were modeled as
frame element while slabs were modeled as shell element. Material properties and loads were
assigned as mentioned above. Rigid diaphragm for concrete slab was assigned at each floor
level. Figure 2 -2shows the finite element model of the building, modeled with ETABS16.

11 | P a g e
Figure 2-2 Finite element model of in ETABS 2016

Figure 2- 3 Wall load

12 | P a g e
Figure 2-4 - Live load

13 | P a g e
Figure 2-5- floor finish load

2.2 1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX
according to IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T =0.263 sec

Factors and Coefficients


Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z=0.36
Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7] R=5

14 | P a g e
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6] I =1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II

Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, S a 1.36 Sa
= =1.523233
Sa /g [IS 6.4.5] g T g

Equivalent Lateral Forces


Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R

Calculated Base Shear


Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0.263 32293.7307 2906.4358
X + Ecc. Y 0.263 32293.7307 2906.4358
X - Ecc. Y 0.263 32293.7307 2906.4358

Applied Story Forces

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

15 | P a g e
m kN kN
Story5 16.5 746.2047 0
Story4 13.2 1114.5255 0
Story3 9.9 671.6742 0
Story2 6.6 298.5219 0
Story1 3.3 75.5095 0
Base 0 0 0

16 | P a g e
IS1893 2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation
This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQY
according to IS1893 2002, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = Multiple
Eccentricity Ratio = 5% for all diaphragms
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified

User Period T =0.326 sec

Factors and Coefficients


Seismic Zone Factor, Z [IS Table 2] Z=0.36
Response Reduction Factor, R [IS Table 7] R=5
Importance Factor, I [IS Table 6] I =1
Site Type [IS Table 1] = II

Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient, S a 1.36 Sa
= =1.523233
Sa /g [IS 6.4.5] g T g

Equivalent Lateral Forces


Sa
ZI
Seismic Coefficient, Ah [IS 6.4.2] g
Ah =
2R

Calculated Base Shear


Period
W Vb
Direction Used
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0.326 32293.7307 2906.4358
Y + Ecc. X 0.326 32293.7307 2906.4358
Y - Ecc. X 0.326 32293.7307 2906.4358

Applied Story Forces

17 | P a g e
Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir
m kN kN
Story5 16.5 0 746.2047
Story4 13.2 0 1114.5255
Story3 9.9 0 671.6742
Story2 6.6 0 298.5219
Story1 3.3 0 75.5095
Base 0 0 0

18 | P a g e
2.3 Structure Results
Table 2.1 - Base Reactions
Load
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ X Y Z
Case/Com
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m m m m
bo
EQX 1 -2906.4358 0 0 0 -35893.1144 59400.9699 0 0 0
EQX 2 -2906.4358 0 0 0 -35893.1144 62525.6458 0 0 0
EQX 3 -2906.4358 0 0 0 -35893.1144 56276.294 0 0 0
EQY 1 0 -2906.4358 0 35893.1144 0 -27920.8876 0 0 0
EQY 2 0 -2906.4358 0 35893.1144 0 -30864.1176 0 0 0
EQY 3 0 -2906.4358 0 35893.1144 0 -24977.6575 0 0 0
Table 2.2 - Centers of Mass and Rigidity
Cumulati Cumulati
Diaphrag Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
Story ve X ve Y
m kg kg m m m m m m
kg kg
Story5 D1 230996.81 230996.81 11.34 20.6569 230996.81 230996.81 11.34 20.6569
Story4 D1 707379.02 707379.02 9.6289 19.9164 938375.83 938375.83 10.0501 20.0987
1696252.1 1696252.1
Story3 D1 757876.33 757876.33 9.1867 19.1356 9.6644 19.6684
5 5
2454128.4 2454128.4
Story2 D1 757876.33 757876.33 9.1867 19.1356 9.5169 19.5039
8 8
3220930.9 3220930.9
Story1 D1 766802.43 766802.43 9.0365 18.7903 9.4025 19.334
1 1

2.4 Story Results


Table 2.4 - Story Max/Avg Displacements
Load
Maximum Average
Story Case/Com Direction Ratio
mm mm
bo
Story5 EQX 1 X 29.795 28.43 1.048 Table 2.5 - Story Drifts
Story4 EQX 1 XLoad 27.137 24.102 1.126
Story3 EQX 1 X 20.923 X Y Z
Story Case/Com Direction 18.735
Drift 1.117
Label
Story2 EQX 1 X bo 13.108 11.755 1.115
m m m
Story1 EQX 1
Story5 XEQX 1 5.034X 4.313
0.001731 1.1676 0 26.725 16.5
Story5 EQX 2
Story5 XEQX 2 31.562X 28.948
0.001781 1.09 6 0 26.725 16.5
Story4 EQX 2
Story5 XEQX 3 29.855X 24.015
0.00168 1.2436 0 26.725 16.5
Story3 EQX 2
Story5 XEQY 1 23.098Y 18.675
0.002084 1.23714 6 31.725 16.5
Story2 EQX 2
Story5 XEQY 2 14.49Y 11.724
0.002079 1.23621 10 31.725 16.5
Story1 EQX 2
Story5 XEQY 3 5.558Y 4.167
0.002119 1.33414 6 31.725 16.5
Story5 EQX 3 X 28.029 27.913 1.004 Table 2.6 - Story Forces
Story4 EQX 3 X 24.418 24.189 1.009
Story3 EQX 3 X 18.843 18.796 1.003
2.5 Modal Results
Story2 EQX 3 X 11.845 11.785 1.005
Story1 EQX 3 X 4.509 4.459 1.011 Table 2.7 - Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Story5 EQY 1 Y 27.507 26.634 1.033 (Part 1 of 2)
Story4 EQY 1 Y 23.857
Period 23.069 1.034
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
Story3 EQY 1 Y sec
18.453 17.894 1.031
Story2 Modal
EQY 1 1 Y 0.812
11.539 0.7025
11.217 0.0063
1.029 0 0.7025 0.0063 0
Story1 Modal
EQY 1 2 Y 0.784
4.39 0.0154
4.278 0.7891
1.026 0 0.7179 0.7955 0
Story5 Modal
EQY 2 3 Y 0.734
30.415 0.0987
26.87 0.0196
1.132 0 0.8166 0.815 0
Story4 Modal
EQY 2 4 Y 0.264
26.355 0.0048
23.291 0.085
1.132 0 0.8214 0.9 0
Story3 Modal
EQY 2 5 Y 0.259
20.408 0.0904
18.068 0.0057
1.129 0 0.9117 0.9057 0
Story2 Modal
EQY 2 6 Y 0.24
12.763 0.0132
11.326 0.0012
1.127 0 0.925 0.9069 0
Story1 Modal
EQY 2 7 Y 0.217
4.845 0.0001
4.319 0.0195
1.122 0 0.925 0.9264 0
Story5 Modal
EQY 3 8 Y 0.168
28.198 0.0029
26.399 2.825E-05
1.068 0 0.9279 0.9264 0
Story4 Modal
EQY 3 9 Y 0.162
24.335 0.0007
22.847 0.00011.065 0 0.9287 0.9265 0
Story3 Modal
EQY 3 10 Y 0.152
18.944 0.0229
17.721 0.0034
1.069 0 0.9516 0.9299 0
Story2 Modal
EQY 3 11 Y 0.15
11.902 0.0041
11.109 0.0352
1.071 0 0.9556 0.965 0
Story1 Modal
EQY 3 12 Y 0.142
4.54 0.0035
4.238 2.158E-05
1.071 0 0.9591 0.9651 0

22 | P a g e
2.6 Model participating mass ratios

TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios


Case Mode Period UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY RZ Sum RZ
    sec              
Modal 1 0.348 0.0501 0.491 0 0.0501 0.491 0.4449 0.4449
Modal 2 0.327 0.9407 0.032 0 0.9908 0.523 0.0184 0.4633
Modal 3 0.233 0.0006 0.4669 0 0.9914 0.9899 0.5217 0.985
Modal 4 0.127 0.00001615 0.0019 0 0.9914 0.9918 0.0055 0.9905
Modal 5 0.096 0.0047 0.0002 0 0.9961 0.9919 0.0002 0.9907
Modal 6 0.095 0.0015 0.00002672 0 0.9976 0.9919 0.000001422 0.9907
Modal 7 0.091 0.00002081 0.0052 0 0.9976 0.9972 0.0049 0.9956
Modal 8 0.09 0.0001 0.0006 0 0.9978 0.9978 0.0007 0.9962
Modal 9 0.086 0 0.0000406 0 0.9978 0.9978 0.000001805 0.9962
Modal 10 0.086 0.00003185 9.228E-07 0 0.9978 0.9978 0.0007 0.9969
Modal 11 0.081 0.000001892 0.00000785 0 0.9978 0.9978 0.0000392 0.997
Modal 12 0.08 0.00002968 0.0002 0 0.9978 0.998 0.0004 0.9973

2.7 Load Combinations

Different load combinations are made as per IS code and critical one is selected for
design of the member.

Load Combination for Concrete Design:

Comb. Name Combination


DCon1 1.5DL
DCon2 1.5 (DL + LL)
DCon3 0.9 DL + 1.5EQX
DCon4 0.9 DL - 1.5EQX
DCon5 0.9 DL + 1.5EQY
DCon6 0.9 DL - 1.5EQY
DCon7 1.2 (DL + LL + EQX)
DCon8 1.2 (DL + LL - EQX)
DCon9 1.2 (DL + LL + EQY)
DCon10 1.2 (DL + LL - EQY)
DCon11 1.5 (DL + EQX)
DCon12 1.5 (DL – EQX)
DCon13 1.5 (DL + EQY)
DCon14 1.5 (DL – EQY)

22 | P a g e
Figure 2-3Bending Moment Diagram for Combination DCon2

22 | P a g e
Figure 2- 4Shear force Diagram for Combination DCon2

2.2. Beam and Column Design

Reinforcement output from ETABS2016 and manual calculation for beam and columns are
attached in Annex.

2.3. Foundation Design

Based on bearing capacity of soil, foundation sizes and reinforcement were calculated in
separate Excel sheet, which is attached in Annex.

2.4. Slab Design

22 | P a g e
Slab design was prepared separately in MS-Excel and also checked with the SAFE 2014
result. Manual design is attached in Annex.

3. Conclusion and Recommendation

Analysis and design of the public building was prepared based on IS Codes. For analysis and
design ETABS 2016 software was used. Whenever was necessary to check ETABS result,
manual calculations were also performed. M25 grade of concrete and Fe500 grade rebar
were used for analysis and design. Seismic analysis and design was performed based on IS
1893: 2000 for concrete. For detailing of reinforcement SP 34 and Ductile Detailing Code IS
13920 were used. The building was designed to meet the required performance level
expected by of IS Code for residential building purpose.

We greatly recommend to use standard quality of construction materials and regular


supervision during construction by the qualified Engineer.

22 | P a g e
4. Annexes

Annex1: Foundation Design

Annex2: Slab Design

Annex3: Staircase Design

Annex4: Beam and Column Design

Annex-5 : Truss calculations

22 | P a g e
Annex-1: Foundation Design

22 | P a g e
Uniqu Load UPWARD
ADOPTED
e Case/Comb FZ MX MY L PRESSURE(kN/m Remarks
,L (m)
Name o 2)

1353.7 24.39 1.9


8 DCon2 76.36 2.5
4 6 9 170.1926 Isolated
107.9 12.49
14 DCon2 1800.6 2.5
3 2 2.3 222.8923 Isolated
2006.7 102.7 0.831 2.4
20 DCon2 2.8
7 2 2 3 189.5119 Isolated
2208.3 108.0 - 2.5
26 DCon2 2.8
5 3 22.04 5 203.4545 Isolated
1794.8 104.8 - 2.2
32 DCon2 2.8
7 8 52.84 9 162.107 Isolated
111.8 1.9
38 DCon2 1356.5 -87.5 2.5
9 9 150.9353 Isolated
110.29 - 12.47 0.5
1 DCon2 1
9 0.681 2 7 120.6985 Isolated
79.50 -
50 DCon2 1656.4 2.5
7 19.68 2.2 191.9983 Isolated
2046.5 75.02 - 2.4
56 DCon2
5 9 55.63 5 2.8 177.5609 Isolated
2443.6 73.04 - 2.6
62 DCon2 3
1 7 86.84 8 178.9644 Isolated
2611.9 77.06 - 2.7
68 DCon2 3
5 3 110.8 7 188.4791 Isolated
2051.8 73.79 - 2.4
74 DCon2 2.8
5 5 128.3 5 164.5453 Isolated
1695.4 90.33 - 2.2
80 DCon2 2.5
7 8 142.9 3 167.3893 Isolated
105.52 - 0.5
3 DCon2 2.065 1
6 5.693 6 55.8372 Isolated
1705.0 57.57 14.62 2.2
92 DCon2 2.5
1 1 9 4 200.3508 Isolated
2105.4 52.37 - 2.4
98 DCon2 2.8
5 1 5.093 9 187.6499 Isolated
1972.8 74.37 - 2.4
104 DCon2 2.8
7 8 33.52 1 175.2049 Isolated
1403.9 36.97 - 2.0 Combine
110 DCon2 2.5
4 1 90.24 3 136.1166 d
2425.4 47.79 - 2.6
116 DCon2 3
6 2 72.33 7 176.0282 Isolated
2102.8 81.04 - 2.4
122 DCon2 3
5 4 111.2 8 151.2929 Isolated
1409.8 13.31 - 2.0
134 DCon2 2.5
7 1 33.43 3 145.2365 Isolated
1723.4 28.45 - 2.2
140 DCon2 2.5
6 8 58.39 5 176.1725 Isolated
146 DCon2 2196.3 17.50 - 2.5 2.8 176.9935 Isolated

22 | P a g e
5 9 71.13 4
2636.8 22.27 - 2.7
152 DCon2 3
8 2 69.33 8 188.3535 Isolated
2513.0 27.08 - 2.7
158 DCon2 3
8 8 132.3 2 170.5634 Isolated
1666.9 44.36 - 2.2
164 DCon2 2.5
6 6 144.5 1 152.1768 Isolated
1242.6 - 1.9
188 DCon2 -63.8 2.5
9 17.03 1 111.8605 Isolated
2008.0 2.789 - 2.4
194 DCon2 2.8
2 8 98.43 3 153.3224 Isolated
1343.2 18.95 - 1.9
200 DCon2 2.5
8 1 108.4 9 120.3879 Isolated
501.59 23.41 - 1.2 Combine
205 DCon2 2
5 2 21.02 1 84.79337 d
15.72 - 1.7 Combine
257 DCon2 1086.1 2
4 22.39 8 177.6828 d
1076.9 22.83 - 1.7 Combine
458 DCon2 2
5 8 14.88 8 183.4702 d

FOOTING L=B(m D,m do,m d/2,m


Type NO. ) m m m REINF, BOTTOM

ISOLATE 12 @ 150mm BOTH


1,3 1 350 150 150
D SIDES

8, 14, 38, 50, 80,


ISOLATE 92, 134, 140, 12 @ 125mm BOTH
2.5 550 250 250
D 164, SIDES
188, 200
20, 26, 32, 56,
ISOLATE 16 @ 150mm BOTH
74, 98, 104, 146, 2.8 650 300 300
D SIDES
194
ISOLATE 62, 68, 116, 122 16 @ 125mm BOTH
3 750 350 350
D , 152, 158 SIDES

110, 257, 205, 458 is combined footing (4mx4m) depth = 650mm,

reinforcement is 16 dia @ 125mm c/c both top and bottom.( ANALYZED IN

SAFE)

22 | P a g e
Isolated Footing

             

             

1 Footing Size Design          

             

  Load Pu 2637 KN      

  Design Load P 1934 KN      

             

  Moment in x dir Mux 22 KN-m      

  Moment in y dir Muy 70 KN-m      

             

  Column size cx 550 mm      

    cy 550 mm      

             

  SBC q 250 KN/sqm      

             

  Footing Size required A req 7.73 sqmm      

             

  L 3.00 meters  
Footing Size Provided
  B 3.00 meters      

  Area Provided A prvd 9.00 meters      

             

    Zx 4.50      

    Zx 4.50      

22 | P a g e
             

  Net upward pressure Nup 228 KNm2      

             

    Footing Size OK      

             

             

             

2 Slab Design          

    lx 1.275      

    ly 1.275      

             

  Bending Moment in x dir Mx 279 KN-m      

  Bending Moment in y dir My 279 KN-m      

             

  Concrete fck 20 MPa      

  Steel fy 415 MPa      

             

  Minimum Depth Required dmin 318      

             

  Depth Provided D 750 mm      


Clear Cover c
  50 mm      

  Effective Cover d' 58 mm      

  Effective Depth d' 692 mm      

             
Spacing c/c in mm    
 
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
     
98 c/c 174 c/c 272 c/c
  1155 sqmm    
98 c/c 174 c/c 272 c/c
  1155 sqmm    
22 | P a g e
       
   
       
   

             
1608
Ast across x direction 16 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c
  sqmm  
1608
Ast across y direction 16 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c
  sqmm  

             

             

             

3 One Way Shear along x direction        

             
599 KN
    Vu1      

    ζv 0.289 MPa      

             

    ζc 0.301 MPa      
626 KN
    Vc1      

             

    One Way Shear Check OK      

             

4 One Way Shear along y direction        

             
599 KN
    Vu1      

    ζv 0.289 MPa      

             

    ζc 0.301 MPa      
626 KN
    Vc1      

             

    One Way Shear Check OK      

             

22 | P a g e
             

5 Two Way Shear          


2638 KN
    Vu2      

    ζv 0.834 MPa      

             

    ks*ζc 1.118 MPa      


3534 KN
    Vc1      

             

    Two Way Shear Check OK      

             
Isolated Footing
             
             
1 Footing Size Design          
             
  Load Pu 2208 KN      
  Design Load P 1619 KN      
             
  Moment in x dir Mux 108 KN-m      
  Moment in y dir Muy 22 KN-m      
             
  Column size cx 550 mm      
    cy 550 mm      
             
  SBC q 250 KN/sqm      
             
  Footing Size required A req 6.48 sqmm      
             
  L 2.80 meters  
Footing Size Provided
  B 2.80 meters      
  Area Provided A prvd 7.84 meters      
             
    Zx 3.66      
    Zx 3.66      
             

22 | P a g e
  Net upward pressure Nup 230 KNm2      
             
    Footing Size OK      
             
             
             
2 Slab Design          
    lx 1.125      
    ly 1.125      
             
  Bending Moment in x dir Mx 219 KN-m      
  Bending Moment in y dir My 219 KN-m      
             
  Concrete fck 20 MPa      
  Steel fy 415 MPa      
             
  Minimum Depth Required dmin 282      
             
  Depth Provided D 650 mm      
  Clear Cover c 50 mm      
  Effective Cover d' 58 mm      
  Effective Depth d' 592 mm      
             
  Spacing c/c in mm    
Area of Steel
  12# 16# 20#    
  1062 sqmm 106 c/c 189 c/c 296 c/c
   
  1062 sqmm 106 c/c 189 c/c 296 c/c
   
           
           
             
  Ast across x direction 16 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 1340 sqmm  
  Ast across y direction 16 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 1340 sqmm  
             
             
             
3 One Way Shear along x direction        
             
    Vu1 515 KN      
    ζv 0.311 MPa      
             
    ζc 0.311 MPa      
    Vc1 516 KN      
             
    One Way Shear Check OK      
             
4 One Way Shear along y direction        
             
    Vu1 515 KN      
    ζv 0.311 MPa      
             
    ζc 0.311 MPa      
    Vc1 516 KN      

22 | P a g e
             
    One Way Shear Check OK      
             
             
5 Two Way Shear          
    Vu2 2257 KN      
    ζv 0.835 MPa      
             
    ks*ζc 1.118 MPa      
    Vc1 3023 KN      
             
    Two Way Shear Check OK      
             

22 | P a g e
Annex-2: Slab Design
DESIGN OF
SLAB
AS PER IS
456: 2000

1. Data
Material :
Concrete Grade
25 N/mm2
(fck) =
Reinforcement Steel
500 N/mm2
Grade (fy)

Dimensions:
Short Span = Lx
3 m
=
Long Span = Ly = 2.5 m

Effective Cover
15 mm
=

Boundary Two edges


4
Condition = discontinuous
(Critical support
conditions)

Load :
Floor Finish
1.5 kN/m2
Load wf=
Live Load wL = 4 kN/m2

2. Calculation
Aspect ratio =
1.06
Ly/Lx =
Slab designed
Two Way Slab
as:

Bending Moment
(Table 26 of IS 456-2000)
Coefficients:
x support = 0.0507 For short span support moment.
x span = 0.0381 For short span span moment.
y support = 0.047 For Long span support moment.
y span = 0.035 For Long span span moment.

Assumed overall depth D


125 mm OK
=
Effective depth d = D - Eff. Cover = 110 mm
Selfweightwself = 25 x
3.75 kN/m2 ( Density of concrete assumed 25 kN/m3)
D/1000 =
Total load = w =
9.75 kN/m2
wself+wf+wL=

22 | P a g e
Factored load = wu = 1.5 x
14.6 kN/m2
w=
Factored Bending Moments = Coefficient x wu x
Lx2

3.
Reinforcement
Mu = 0.87 fyAst d (1 - Astfy / bdfck) (Clause G-1.1 of IS 456-2000)
Astreq
(mm2/ m)
Mux support= 10.491 kN m 310.10
Mux span= 8.875 kN m 300.36
Muy support= 9.020 kN m 320.63
Muy span= 8.483 kN m 200.77

Minimum Astreq = 0.12% of 1000 x D


150 mm2 per meter
=

Reinforcement Provided:
Short Span
10 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 520 OK
Support:
Short Span
10 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 520 OK
Span:
Long Span
10 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 520 OK
Support:
Long Span
10 Dia at 150 c/c Ast= 520 OK
Span:

4. Check for Deflection:


Basic L/d = 26 (Clause 23.2.1 of IS 456-2000)
Modification
2.00 (Figure 4 of IS 456-2000)
factor =
d req as per deflection control= Lx / (Basic L/d x Modification 71.
mm
factor)= 80
d
d required < provide so, OK
d

5. Check for
Shear:
Factored Shear Force Vu = wu x Lx/2 = 17.15 kN
Nominal Shear Stress (v)
0.156 N/mm2
= Vu/ bd=
(Clause 40.2.1.1 of IS 456-
k= 1.30 for D = mm
125 2000)
0.3 (Table 19 of IS
c= 0.386 N/mm2 for pt = 100Ast/bd = 04 456-2000)
Permissible shear stress
= k c =
N/mm2 > v SAFE
0.502

Annex-3: Staircase Design


22 | P a g e
Total height 1.65 m

Length(span) 6.00 m
Tread   300.00 mm  
Riser   150 mm  
Live Load&FF 5.50 kN/m2  
fcu   25.00 N/mm²  
fy   500.00 N/mm²  
cover   25.00 mm  
L/d basic ratio 26.00    
Lt/L(stair flight) 0.80    
h   250.00 mm  
1700.0
As provided 0 mm²/m  
T16-
Provide :   110    
         
LOADING & MOMENT (Considered 1.8m width)
(T2 +R2)   = 6.22 m
(Actual slant length)      
Weight of waist & steps = 43.28 kN
Live load   = 33.00 kN
Design load,F = 113.39 kN
         
Mult   = 122.46 kNm
         

DEFLECTION      

M/bd²   = 2.65  

fs   = 278.68  

fu   = 1.02  

    = 1.02  

Allowable, L/d = 30.37  

Actual, L/d = 27.91 OK

         

MAIN REINFORCEMENT  

M   = 122.46 kNm

d   = 215.00 mm

K   = 0.11  

Z   = 0.86 d

    = 0.86 d

22 | P a g e
As   = 1516.04 mm²/m

Asmin   = 375.00 mm²/m

So,Asreq = = 1516.04 mm²/m

Waist slab =250mm, 16 dia @110mmc/c

Annex-4: Beam and Column Design


ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design (Envelope)

Beam Element Details


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B57 456 BEAM 400X500 6000 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
400 500 400 0 35 35

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Flexural Reinforcement for Major Axis Moment, Mu3

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J


Rebar Area Rebar Rebar Area Rebar Rebar Area Rebar
mm² % mm² % mm² %

Top (+2 Axis) 1880 0.94 584 0.29 2337 1.17


Bot (-2 Axis) 1071 0.54 797 0.4 1169 0.58

Flexural Design Moment, Mu3

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J


Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc
kN-m mm kN-m mm kN-m mm

Top (+2 Axis) -310.1538 275 0 4000 -395.6448 5725


Combo DCon8 DCon14 DCon7

22 | P a g e
End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J
Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc Design Mu Station Loc
kN-m mm kN-m mm kN-m mm

Bot (-2 Axis) 191.1922 275 147.1601 2000 0 5725


Combo DCon11 DCon7 DCon7

Shear Reinforcement for Major Shear, Vu2

End-I Middle End-J


Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s Rebar Asv /s
mm²/m mm²/m mm²/m

1039.61 957.42 1175.58

Design Shear Force for Major Shear, Vu2

End-I End-I Middle Middle End-J End-J


Design Vu Station Loc Design Vu Station Loc Design Vu Station Loc
kN mm kN mm kN mm

263.5638 275 0.2319 4000 288.4301 5725


DCon7 DCon3 DCon8

Torsion Reinforcement

Shear
Rebar Asvt /s
mm²/m

664.57

Design Torsion Force

Design Tu Station Loc Design Tu Station Loc


kN-m mm kN-m mm
2.3841 5000 2.8784 5725
DCon7 DCon2

22 | P a g e
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Column Section Design(Envelope)

Column Element Details


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C4 16 COL550X550 3300 0.533

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
550 550 56 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Longitudinal Reinforcement Design for Pu - Mu2 - Mu3 Interaction

Rebar Area Rebar


Column End
mm² %
Top 2420 0.8
Bottom 4014 1.33

Design Axial Force & Biaxial Moment for Pu - Mu2 - Mu3 Interaction

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Station Loc


Column End Controlling Combo
kN kN-m kN-m mm
kN kN-m kN-m mm
Top 994.5267 68.9873 33.2152 2800 DCon14
Bottom 1567.3812 444.2953 -37.5127 0 DCon9

Shear Reinforcement for Major Shear, Vu2

22 | P a g e
Rebar Asv /s Design Vu2 Station Loc
Column End Controlling Combo
mm²/m kN mm
Top 609.64 141.7327 2800 DCon14
Bottom 609.64 141.7327 0 DCon14

Shear Reinforcement for Minor Shear, Vu3

Rebar Asv /s Design Vu3 Station Loc


Column End Controlling Combo
mm²/m kN mm
Top 609.64 222.6424 2800 DCon14
Bottom 609.64 222.6424 0 DCon14

Joint Shear Check/Design

Shear Shear Joint


Joint Shear Controlling
Vu,Tot Vc Area
Ratio Combo
kN kN mm²

Major(Vu2) 0.621 939.656 1512.5 302500 DCon11


Minor(Vu3) 0.621 1483.6971 1512.5 302500 DCon11

22 | P a g e
Red = beam 400x500mm
Pink= sec. beam 230x400mm
Green = beam 300x 600mm

22 | P a g e
Figure: FIRST FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

22 | P a g e
Figure: : SECOND FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

22 | P a g e
Figure: : THIRD FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

22 | P a g e
Figure: : FOURTH FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

22 | P a g e
Figure: : TOP FLOOR BEAM REINFORCEMENT

22 | P a g e
Column reinforcements at different
grids

22 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
Beam Reinforcement Detail
22 | P a g e
Reinforcement
Type of
S.N. Size of beam Dir At support At center
beam
Top Bottom Top Bottom

4–
4–20Φ +4- 4–20Φ+2–
4–20Φ 20Φ+2–
20Φ(Ex) 20Φ
First &Third X-dir 20Φ
1 400x500
floor beam 4–
4–20Φ +4- 4–20Φ+2–
4–20Φ 20Φ+2–
20Φ(Ex) 20Φ
Y-dir 20Φ

4–
5–20Φ +4- 4–20Φ+3–
5–20Φ 20Φ+3–
20Φ(Ex) 20Φ
Second floor X-dir 20Φ
2 400x500
beam
4–
5–20Φ +4- 4–20Φ+3–
5–20Φ 20Φ+3–
20Φ(Ex) 20Φ
Y-dir 20Φ

4–20Φ +3-
Fourth and 4–20Φ 4–20Φ 4–20Φ
16Φ(Ex)
3 top floor 400x500 X-dir
beam
5–20Φ +4-
4–20Φ 4–20Φ 4–20Φ
Y-dir 20Φ(Ex)

IN BEAMS(300X600), 3-20 Φ + 3-16 Φ (ex) at top and 3-20 Φ at bottom, 8 Φ -2 legged


stirrups @ 100 mm C/C (at ENDS) & @ 150 mm C/ C

IN BEAMS(400x500) , 10Φ -4 legged stirrups @ 100 mm C/C (at ENDS) & @ 150 mm C/ C

IN SEC. BEAMS(230X400),4- 16 DIA TOP AND BOTTOM BOTH, 8Φ -2 legged stirrups @ 100
mm C/C (at ENDS) & @ 150 mm C/ C

IN PLINTH. BEAMS(230X400),3- 16 DIA TOP AND BOTTOM BOTH, 8Φ -2 legged stirrups @


100 mm C/C (at ENDS) & @ 150 mm

Table 1: Summary of Design of Column

Concrete = M25 Rebar = HYSD 500

22 | P a g e
Column Ground & Remainin
S.N. Grid Location Size first floor g Floors Stirrups

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-20Ø+4- bottom) & @
1 1 400DIA - 150 mm C/C (at
16 Ø
mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-25Ø+8- bottom) & @
2 2,3,4 550X550 12-20Ø 150 mm C/C (at
20 Ø
mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
4-25Ø+8- bottom) & @
3 5,6,7 550X550 12-25Ø 150 mm C/C (at
20 Ø
mid height) in all
columns

8mm Ø stirrups
@ 100 mm C/C
(at top and
THREE LIFT 4-25Ø+8- 4-25Ø+8-
4 400X400 bottom) & @
COLUMNS 20 Ø 16 Ø
150 mm C/C (at
mid height) in all
colum

22 | P a g e
RED COLOUR=ISNB 100M

BLUE COLOUR= ISNB 90M

GREEN COLOUR= ISNB 80M

WHITE= ISMB 3OO

22 | P a g e
RED COLOUR=ISNB 100M

BLUE COLOUR= ISNB 90M

GREEN COLOUR= ISNB 80M

WHITE= ISMB 3OO

22 | P a g e

Вам также может понравиться