Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Here the explanatory variable is total wealth (in dollars) and age (in years) is the response variable.
a.
y=β0+β1x+e ,
Now, we have to estimate the coefficients of the equation using least square method.
β1=covx,ySx2 and β0=y-β1x
X=1ni=1nxi, Y=1ni=1nyi
Now, we have the estimated values as,
45.2159
β0
5.3265
β1
The estimated regression equation is,
b.
Now, at the person’s age of 50 years, we have to estimate the total wealth. We replace x=50
c.
r2=SxySxxSyy
Interpretation:
91.46% of the total variability is explained by the estimated regression model.
d.
Now, here the extent of relationship between the person’s age and wealth is computed at the significance
level of 10%.
Hypothesis to be tested:
We want to test,
H11:not H01
ii)H02:β0=0 ag. H12:β0≠0
iii)H03:β1=0 ag. H13:β1≠0
Test Statistics:
For testing H02, the appropriate statistics is , t1=β0-β0SE(β0) follows t distribution having a df value,
F=51907.64840.3936=61.7658
t1=45.215939.8049=1.1359
t2=5.32650.6777=7.8596
Critical values:
We take α=0.05.
Then F0.05;1.6=5.9873
t0.05;6=1.9432
Here to calculate the critical value we use Excel .Inv() function.
Conclusion:
Here, the critical value is less than the value of F statistic, hence, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is
concluded on the basis of the given data that the model fits the data moderately.