Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2266-4
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract In the delimitation of flood-prone areas, particularly in areas that are difficult to
access using traditional flight equipment, the most critical problem is the generation of a
high-quality DEM of the major and minor riverbed, in order to obtain several hydraulic
parameters (e.g., the surface of the drainage section, average water velocity) with equiv-
alent accuracy. The chosen area for the case study represents one with the greatest history
of hydrological risk factors in the Someşul Mic basin, given the extreme previous
hydrological events that have taken place (e.g., in the year 1995) as well as the limited
capacity of the river for upstream river flow, and to handle the volume of the flash floods.
In this study, the use of UAV technology coupled with Leica MultiStation for validation
made it possible to achieve this performance. Another advantage was the existence of the
hydrometric station situated in the middle of the study area, the information from which
was used for statistics, calibration of the measurements and validation of the results
obtained (roughness of the riverbed, the debit with an overflow possibility). The hydraulic
calculations performed on the 11 transverse profiles, conducted using the GIS terrain
123
Nat Hazards
model, led to the high accuracy defining of the flood-prone areas corresponding to the
flows in the major riverbed with probabilities of 1 and 5 %. Also highlighted on the 2D and
3D images were several civilian areas at risk in the case of extreme hydrological events,
related to maximum flow.
Keywords UAV Transversal profile Lymnimetric key GIS DEM Flood-prone area
1 Introduction
123
Nat Hazards
et al. 2005; Pappenberger et al. 2006; Neal et al. 2007; Vanderkimpen et al. 2009;
Chevereşan 2011; Altarejos-Garcia et al. 2012; Dutta et al. 2013).
Current trends are meant to direct research on torrential water courses, with hydro-
graphic basins frequently under 100 km2, which, along with some other courses known to
produce floods, pose high and continual problems on human society, which has developed
its habitat in the neighboring areas (Arghius 2007; Şerban et al. 2013).
Undoubtedly, UAVs can contribute to the improvement of this type of research, as it
ensures ease of use and high accuracy if they are properly equipped and calibrated, and can
significantly reduce the working time (Ellum and El-Sheimy 2006; Gerke 2008; Kerle et al.
2008; Choi et al. 2009; Roeoesli 2009; Sauerbier 2009). The efficiency of the obtained
high-resolution terrain models, along with precision hydraulic calculations, enables the
development of flood maps for areas with high vulnerability to flooding and with limited
accessibility. Also, performing more flights during overflows facilitates a better monitoring
of the flooded areas in order to make optimal decisions on managing the post-flood phe-
nomenon (Abdelkader et al. 2013, 2014; Hervouet et al. 2011; Horritt and Bates 2002;
Merwade et al. 2008; Taubenbock et al. 2011).
The favorable conditions in the upper basin of the Someş Mic River, located in north-
eastern part of the Apuseni Mountains, allowed the building of a major hydrotechnical
installation, which highlight some of the existing natural potential in the area (Fig. 1).
123
Nat Hazards
The 860 km2 in the section of the Gilău dam (lower limit of the studied basin) was
developed since the late 1960s, with the construction of four large reservoirs on the
Someşului Cald Valley (Fântânele, Tarniţa, Someşul Cald and Gilău) and several river
catchments and underground pipelines in the Someşului Rece basin, in order to supplement
the tributary flow into the four lakes in the area (Şerban 2007).
In the first stage (1968–1980), the largest reservoirs were completed, two on the
Someşul Cald River and one on the Someşul Mic. Lake Gilău was the first, opened in
1972, followed by Lake Tarniţa in 1973 and Lake Fântânele in 1976. Also, in the first
stage, work began on catchments and underground pipelines from the upper basins of Iara
and Someşul Rece rivers, with some of them being completed and put into use (Someşul
Rece II). In the second phase (1980–1990), all of the above-mentioned catchments and
underground pipelines began to be used, finalizing with the harnessing of the Someşul Cald
River, in 1983, and the exploitation of the Someşul Cald reservoir (Fig. 1).
The main axis of the intakes and culverts is Iara-Fântânele, with this system’s culvert
being 21 km long (Pop 1996). Of the 8 intakes found on this axis, one has a dam and a
reservoir (Someşul Rece I), foreseen with a drainage tap (drain trap) located on the left
bank, next to the dam. The rest of them are smaller and fitted with a complex water-capture
system (Tyrolese Kingston valve). The Iara-Fântânele culvert has a medium annual flow of
5.87 m3/s at its spill in the Fântânele reservoir. The flow has its origins in the upper basin
of the Iara River (1.78 m3/s) and from the upper basin of the Someşul Rece River
(4.09 m3/s), as shown in Table 1 (Şerban 2007).
The secondary intake and culvert axis is at Someşul Rece II (the Tarniţa underground
pipeline). This one supplements the flow in the Tarniţa reservoir, at intake and implicitly at
spill after gathering waters from the interbasinal space of the Someşului Rece River, which
Table 1 Multiannual average flow on the intakes from the basins of Iara and Someşul Rece (after ‘‘Someş-
Tisa’’ Water Basin Administration, Cluj)
Intake Surface Dam altitude Multiannual average
(km2) (m) flow (m3/s)
123
Nat Hazards
is located below the aforementioned intakes. The medium multiannual flow rate of this
3-km-long culvert is 0.8 m3/s (Table 1).
Adding the multiannual average flow of the Iara-Fântânele underground pipeline to the
one on the Someşul Cald at the dam section (6.67 m3/s), one can observe an annual
average flow in the reservoir of 12.68 m3/s (almost half of the flow coming from the
system of dams and culverts).
Lying on the eastern boundary of the granitic pluton of Muntele Mare and the contact
with crystalline system (Serban 2007), the studied area shows a massive and a very
significant narrowing of the valleys, which are gorge-like almost their entire length, with
some small widening basins. This area is characterized by deep valleys, which makes
access along the valleys difficult using traditional aircraft (Fig. 2).
The map of this parameter, determined in ArcMap using an extension designed in our
institution (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Geography) by Ferencsik in 2007, shows
values in excess of 500 m, at the confluence of Răcătău and Somes Rece valleys. Also,
measurements, calculated using the same program, of the distance between the peaks of the
valley, which could constitute obstacles to the aircraft, showed values between 983 and
1400 m.
On a microscale level, the study area corresponds to a narrow confluence basin (Fig. 2),
dug in crystalline schists, where the flows of the Răcătău and Someşului Rece rivers,
reestablished after upstream intakes, reconfigure the meadow, after every important flood.
Generally, the maximum recorded flow rates have medium probabilities of production (as
shown in Table 2); however, the reduced hydraulic capacity of the minor riverbed deter-
mines water meadow flooding at a 25 % probability, which in the case of other water
courses would raise some problems.
In December 1995, Răcătău and Someşul Rece rivers flooded three quarters of the water
meadows in the confluence area resulting in significant negative effects on local economic
and social components. The corner of the Măguri-Răcătău school building, located next to
the river Răcătău remained suspended at 1.5 m above the new thalweg of the river, due to
particularly strong vertical and right horizontal erosion (Şerban 2007). According to the
‘‘Someş-Tisa’’ Water Basin Administration, a water level of 265 cm was recorded,
exceeding the hydrometric rod danger level by 15 cm.
In these conditions, the above-mentioned institution, together with local authorities
proceeded to execute the embankment and strengthening of the banks of the left tributary
Fig. 2 The 3D model of the terrain, the depth of the relief fragmentation and the granite pluton
corresponding to the upper basin of Someşul Mic
123
123
Table 2 Peak flows with runoff probabilities and coefficients of several floods in the basin (after ‘‘Someş-Tisa’’ Water Basin Administration, Cluj)
Hydrometric station 1970 1995 1997 1998
Q max Data P (%) Q max Data P (%) a Q max Data P (%) a Q max Data P (%) a
Smida – – – 108 December 24 4 1.29a 49.1 May 9 44 0.95 36.9 June 19 52 0.59
Poiana Horea – – – 36.1 December 27 42 0.79 19.2 May 9 72 0.84 11 June 19 89 0.60
Răcătău 16.4 August 8 82 56.5 December 27 24 0.42 21.6 May 9 70 0.93 18.5 June 19 78 0.47
Someşu Rece-uzină 50.9 May 12 48 – – – – – – – – –
Someşu Rece-sat – – – 98 December 27 20 0.22 32 May 9 62 0.30 57 June 19 46 0.25
a
Above par value drainage coefficient a is due to the preexistence of consistent snow cover
Italic fonts in the Răcătău hydrometric station indicate the hydraulic elements of the most destructive flash-flood for this area of Apuseni Mountains
Nat Hazards
Nat Hazards
of the Someş Rece River, up to the altimetric level of the water meadow, on a distance of
about 400 m downstream from the confluence.
The study was conducted based on preliminary analysis of detailed cartographic materials
(topographic maps 1:5000, orthophotos).
The altimetry measurements made in the field using the UAV technology (quadcopter)
had the goal of achieving of a detailed digital terrain model, in order to develop highly
accurate flooding areas.
• Accuracy of 3D reconstruction (5 cm) is much higher than traditional photogrammetric
solutions.
• The final product (DEM, orthophoto) can be georeferenced and integrated into any GIS
or CAD application.
• This process allows accurate qualitative and quantitative approach (distance, area and
volume).
• The procedure is of noninvasive nature and is applicable in areas difficult to reach or
inaccessible by traditional technology.
The application of UAV technology has numerous benefits, including increased 3D
reconstruction accuracy, georeferencing and integration capabilities into any GIS or CAD
application, accurate qualitative and quantitative results, and its noninvasive nature which
allows it access to virtually any terrain, often inaccessible using traditional technology.
The UAV system that was used (Fig. 3) in this study has the following characteristics
and riggings:
• approximately 40-min flight autonomy;
• maximum flight level—250 m;
• 2.4-GHz frequency controller;
123
Nat Hazards
Fig. 4 Detailed composite aerial image of the studied area achieved by UAV technology
123
Nat Hazards
Fig. 5 The concept of the Daisy mathematical algorithm (after Tola et al. 2010)
123
Nat Hazards
Fig. 7 Exportable work surface textures in high-resolution orthophoto and the 3D sketch of the study area,
in inset
Using the Arc Map module (the support grid), one proceeded to plotting 11 cross
sections at a distance not exceeding 25 m between them for the best possible accuracy in
interpolation of flooding zones (Fig. 8). In the first phase, these profiles were georefer-
enced in local coordinate for performing hydraulic calculations to scale regarding the
cross-sectional area of the river flow.
Average rates of water speed in the 11 sections were determined based on either the
relation Vm = f(H), in the rod section, or the Manning formula:
1 2=3
Vm ¼ Rh I 1=2
n
where
Vm average speed of water flow (m/s);
n Gauckler–Manning coefficient;
Rh hydraulic radius (m);
I the slope at the water surface level (m/m)
Fig. 8 Example of two cross sections (P1 and P3) georeferenced in local coordinates, with defined cross-
sectional areas, of 1 and 5 % probability of discharge
123
Nat Hazards
In the second phase, hydraulic radius Rh was considered 0.9 from the average depth of
profile hmed. Hydraulic slope I was determined over land surveying and the Gauckler–
Manning coefficient ‘‘n’’ from the tables.
Georeferencing the cross sections, upon which were marked limits of water level at
Q5 % and Q1 %, in the Stereo 1970 Coordinate System and over overlapping this with the
relief model represented the last steps before determining the areas of flooding for the two
probabilities (Fig. 9).
Actual flooding areas were obtained through the ArcMap graphic interpolation between
the ends of the cross sections according to the slope elevation grid (Fig. 10).
After outlining both graphical areas, their spatial extent can also be determined:
• for Q5 %, S = 10,114 m2 P = 575 m;
• for Q1 %, S = 13159 m2 P = 601 m,
where
Fig. 9 Sample cross sections georeferenced in Stereo 1970 Coordinate System, overlapping the relief
model (under ‘‘Transparency … 50 %’’ of ArcMap ‘‘Effect’’ extension; this facilitates the interpolation
seeing the DEM in background)
123
Nat Hazards
Fig. 10 Flooding areas at Q1 % and Q5 % before the confluence of the rivers Răcătău and Someşul Rece
Fig. 11 Flooding areas at Q1 % and Q5 % in 3D, before the confluence of the rivers Răcătău and Someşul
Rece
123
Nat Hazards
program for the basin-flooding areas of Someş, with hazard maps and flood risk maps
being available to those interested on the institution’s Web site. The area of the present
study cannot be found, however, on the interactive map on site http://gis2.rowater.ro:8989/
flood/, but will probably become an area of interest for specialists in the near future.
Based on the input from several residents in the study area, it is inferred that they feel
protected by the upstream hydrotechnical works and improved minor riverbed. There is
however a certain percentage (about a quarter) of residents who realize that the risk of
flooding their households persists, particularly the elders, who live in the proximity of the
minor riverbed, who have lived different experiences of this kind over time.
The fortune of inhabitants was that floods with maximum flow of small probability have
not occurred in the past 30 years (Table 2). However, given the timing and development of
extreme hydrological events in recent times, we may even witness such events.
4 Conclusions
Developing flood areas is one of the major current issues, given the increasing frequency
and intensity of hydrological phenomena of risk. This action is imperative all the more so
as residential areas situated in the river valleys are affected.
UAV technology, applied in the developing of flood areas, has a great future in view of
its advantages, mostly when used in smaller areas, but very sensitive and not accessible
with classic aircraft (Fig. 6 inset).
The benefits of applying this technology are as follows:
• 3D reconstruction process based on UAV technology (drone) and the interpolation
algorithm ‘‘Daisy’’ is cheap, relying on open-source solutions.
• Accuracy of 3D reconstruction (5 cm) is much higher than traditional photogrammetric
solutions.
• The final product (DEM, orthophoto) can be georeferenced and integrated into any GIS
or CAD application.
• This process allows an accurate qualitative and quantitative approach (distance, area,
volume).
• The procedure is of noninvasive nature and is applicable in the areas difficult to reach
or inaccessible by traditional technology.
Some disadvantages of applying this technology are as follows:
• Flight cannot be executed in conditions of winds over 60 km/h and in unfavorable light
conditions; for this study, the flight was executed in calm weather conditions.
• Flight autonomy is relatively low on battery unit (under 40 min), to avoid system
collapse and recording significant damage; instead, there can be bought more batteries
to change them at every 30 min.
• Low environment temperature is unfavorable, resulting in faster battery consumption;
the measurements in this study were carried out at the end of April, when plants were
not in their vegetative phase, the sky was clear, and the temperature reached a
maximum of 20 C.
• Significant hardware resources are required in processing data: in this case, a computer
system with an Intel i7 processor, 16 GB RAM and a 256 GB SSD.
123
Nat Hazards
The time elapsed in the post-planning period showed that feed pipes and catchments do
not constitute flood protection for downstream villages. The 1.52 m3/s captured, on
average, in the upper basin of the Răcătău River and even the maximum of 5 m3/s cannot
significantly reduce the rates of floods and flood risk in the event of floods with maximum
flows, whose probabilities to excess is below 25 %. The flood of December 1995 was hard
to forget for residents in Măguri-Răcătău, both on Răcătău and on Someş Rece valleys.
The identification of high-risk areas could contribute to the sustainable development of
the communities by reducing potential damage, following the enforcement of restrictions
regarding the location of various buildings in these areas.
References
Abdelkader M, Shaqura M, Claudel C, Gueaieb W (2013) A UAV based system for real time flash flood
monitoring in desert environments using Lagrangian microsensors. International Conference on
Unmanned Aircraft Systems, pp 25–34
Abdelkader M, Shaqura M, Ghommem M, Collier N (2014) Optimal multi-agent path planning for fast
inverse modeling in UAV-based flood sensing applications, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS),
2014 International Conference, 27–30 May 2014, Orlando, 64–71
Altarejos-Garcia L, Martinez-Chenol ML, Escuder-Bueno I, Serrano-Lombillo A (2012) Assessing the
impact of uncertainty on flood risk estimates with reliability analysis using 1-D and 2-D hydraulic
models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1895–1914
Ambrosia VG, Wegener S, Zajkowski T, Sullivan DV, Buechel S, Enomoto F, Hinkley EA, Lobitz B,
Schoenung S (2011) The Ikhana UAS western states fire imaging missions: from concept to reality
(2006–2010). Geocarto Int 26:85–101
Arghiuş V (2007) Analiza viiturilor spontane formate ı̂n data de 18 iunie 2006 pe cursurile mici de apă din
bazinul mijlociu al Arieşului. Riscuri şi Catastrofe, Vol. VI, Nr. 4:153–165 (in Romanian)
Arghiuş V, Arghiuş C (2007) Qualitative assessment of flood induced material risk in Câmpeni town.
Riscuri şi Catastrofe, Vol. VI, Nr. 4:143–152
Baiocchi V, Dominici D, Mormile M (2013) UAV application in post-seismic environment. Int Arch
Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-1/W2:21–25
Bhatt CM, Rao GS, Manjusree P, Bhanumurthy V (2011) Potential of high resolution satellite data for
disaster management: a case study of Leh, Jammu & Kashmir (India) flash floods, 2010. Geomat Nat
Hazards Risk 2(4):365–375. doi:10.1080/19475705.2011.580014
Bobee B (1975) The log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrology. Water Resour Res
2(5):681–689
Chevereşan BA (2011) Acurateţea MNT pentru definirea zonelor inundabile. Teză de doctorat, Universi-
tatea Tehnica de Constructii Bucuresti, Facultatea de Hidrotehnica, Conducator ştiinţific Prof. dr. ing.
Radu Drobot. (in Romanian)
Chiabrando F, Nex F, Piatti D, Rinaudo F (2011) UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in
archaelogical areas: two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). J Archaeol Sci 38:697–710
Choi K, Lee I, Hong J, Oh T, Shin SW (2009) Developing a UAV-based rapid mapping system for
emergency response. In: Gerhart GR, Gage DW, Shoemaker CM (eds) Proceedings of SPIE 7332,
unmanned systems technology XI, 733209 (30 April 2009). doi: 10.1117/12.818492
Cojoc GM, Romanescu G, Tı̂rnovan A (2015) Exceptional floods on a developed river: case study for the
Bistriţa River from the Eastern Carpathians (Romania). Nat Hazards 77:1421–1451. doi:10.1007/
s11069-014-1439-2
Constantinescu M, Goldstein M, Haram V, Solomon S (1956) Hidrologie. Edit. Tehnică, Bucureşti, p 365
(in Romanian)
D’Oleire-Oltmanns S, Irene Marzolff, Peter KD, Ries JB (2012) Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for
monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sens 4:3390–3416
Diaconu C, Şerban P (1994) Sinteze şi regionalizări hidrologice, Ed. Tehnică, Bucureşti, p 388 (in
Romanian)
Domeneghetti A, Vorogushyn S, Castellarin A, Merz B, Brath A (2013) Probabilistic flood hazard mapping:
effects of uncertain boundary conditions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:3127–3140
123
Nat Hazards
Dutta D, Teng J, Vaze J, Lerat J, Hughes J, Marvanek S (2013) Storage-based approaches to build floodplain
inundation modelling capability in river system models for water resources planning and accounting.
J Hydrol 504:12–28
Eisenbeiss H, Sauerbier M (2011) Investigation of UAV systems and flight modes for photogrammetric
applications. Photogramm Rec 26:400–421
Ellum C, El-Sheimy N (2006) New strategies for integrating photogrammetric and GNSS data. In: Inter-
national archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Commission V
Symposium ‘Image Engineering and Vision Metrology, Dresden, Germany, XXXVI-Part 5, 103–108
Everaerts J (2008) The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS) for remote sensing and mapping. IAPRS
SIS 37(B1):1187–1192 (Beijing, China)
Floods Directive—Floods risk and hazard maps, ‘‘Romanian Waters’’ National Administration, http://gis2.
rowater.ro:8989/flood. Accessed 15 Apr 2015
Gaume E et al (2009) A compilation of data on European flash floods. J Hydrol 367:70–78
Gerke M (2008) Dense image matching in airborne video sequences. In: Jun C, Jie J, FÖRSTNER W (eds)
The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences,
XXIst ISPRS Congress Technical Commission III, vol XXXVII, Part B3b, Beijing, pp 639–644
Hervouet A, Dunford R, Piégay H, Belletti B, Trémélo M (2011) Analysis of post-flood recruitment patterns
in braided-channel rivers at multiple scales based on an image series collected by unmanned aerial
vehicles, ultra-light aerial vehicles and satellites. GISci Remote Sens 48:50–73
Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inun-
dation. J Hydrol 268(1–4):87–99
Hunt ER Jr, Hively WD, Fujikawa SJ, Linden DS, Daughtry CST, McCarty GW (2010) Acquisition of NIR-
green-blue digital photographs evaluation of digital photography from unmanned aircraft for crop
monitoring. Remote Sens 2:290–305
Kerle N, Heuel S, Pfeifer N (2008) Real-time data collection and information generation using airborne
sensors. In: Zlatanova S, Li J (eds) Geospatial information technology for emergency response. Taylor
& Francis, London, pp 43–74
Li C, Zhang G, Lei T, Gong A (2011) Quick image-processing method of UAV without control points data
in earthquake disaster area. Trans Nonferr Metals Soc China 21:523–528
Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic
modelling and flood inundation mapping. Environ Model Soft-ware 23(10–11):1300–1311
Neal JC, Atkinson PM, Hutton CW (2007) Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman
filter and spatially distributed measurements. J Hydrol 336:401–415
Niethammer U, Rothmund S, James MR, Travelletti J, Joswig M (2010) UAV-based remote sensing of
landslides, Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. Spatial Inf. Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII. ISPRS Comm. V.,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K, pp. 496-501
Niethammer U, James MR, Rothmund S, Travelletti J, Joswig M (2011) UAV-based remote sensing of the
Super-Sauze landslide: evaluation and results. Eng Geol 128:2–11
Pandi G (2002) Riscul ı̂n activitatea de apărare ı̂mpotriva inundaţiilor, Vol. ‘‘Riscuri şi catastrofe’’, Editor
Sorocovschi, V., Edit. Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă, Cluj-Napoca, pp 131–141. (in Romanian)
Pappenberger FL, Matgen P, Beven KJ, Henry JB, Pfister L, de Fraipont P (2006) Influence of uncertain
boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. Adv Water Resour
29:1430–1449
Pătruţ S (2010) Evenimente extreme (inundaţii) pe cursul inferior al Dunării ı̂n corelaţie cu Oscilaţia Nord
Atlantică (NAO) şi presiunea la nivelul mării (SLP). In: Gastescu P. Bretcan P (eds) Resusele de apă
din România -Vulnerabilitate la presiunile antropice, 11–13 iunie 2010, Târgovişte, România
pp 127–132 (in Romanian)
Pop G (1996) România: geografie hidroenergetică. Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, p 237
(in Romanian)
Puri A, Valavanis P, Kontitsis M (2007) Statistical profile generation for traffic monitoring using real-time
UAV based video data, Proc. Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Athens, Greece
Remondino F, Barazzetti L, Nex F, Scaioni M, Sarazzi D (2011) UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3d
modeling current status and future perspectives, International Archives of the Photogrammetry,
Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXVIII-1/C22, pp. 25-31
Roeoesli C (2009) Processing of UAV-images: Samoilov Island. Russia, Institute of Geodesy and Pho-
togrammetry, ETH Zurich, Zurich, p 46
Sanders R, Shaw F, MacKay H, Galy H, Foote M (2005) National flood modelling for insurance purposes:
using IFSAR for flood risk estimation in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9(4):449–456
Sarhadi A, Soltani S, Modarres R (2012) Probabilistic flood inundation mapping of ungauged rivers: linking
GIS techniques and frequency analysis. J Hydrol 458–459:68–86
123
Nat Hazards
Sauerbier M (2009) 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, In: Interna-
tional Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Proceedings of
the 3rd ISPRS International Workshop 3D-ARCH 2009, Trento, Italy, XXXVIII-5/W1, on DVD
Schumann G, Matgen P, Hoffmann L, Hostache R, Pappenberger F, Pfister L (2007) Deriving distributed
roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling. J Hydrol 344:96–111
Şerban Gh (2007) Lacurile de acumulare din bazinul superior al Someşului Mic. Studiu hidrogeografic. Edit.
Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, 236 p. (in Romanian)
Şerban Gh, Pandi G, Hattemer C, Vinet F (2009) Benzile de inundabilitate 5% şi 1% ı̂n perimetrul localităţii
Someşul Rece-sat aval de captările din bazinul Someşului Rece - Munţii Apuseni). Hidrotehnica, nr. 2,
Bucureşti. (in Romanian)
Şerban Gh, Hognogi Gh, Stoica Fl (2013) The 05.06.2012 slope flood runoff in the lower basin of Ilişua
river: causes, effects and future measures. Volume of the ‘‘Air and Water—Components of the
Environment’’ Conference, Editors in Chief: G., Pandi & F., Moldovan, Executive Editors: Gh. Şerban,
Adina Croitoru, Răzvan Bătinaş, Csaba Horvath, Blanka Bartok, 22-23 March, Babeş-Bolyai
University, Faculty of Geography, Cluj-Napoca, România, Edit. Presa Universitară Clujeană, pp. 143-
150
Stanciu P, Nedelcu G, Nicula G (2005) Hazardurile hidrologice din Romania. Nat Anthropog Hazards
5(23):11–17 (in Romanian)
Steffen R, Foerstner W (2008) On visual real time mapping for unmanned aerial vehicles. IAPRS SIS
37(B3a):57–62
Sugiura R, Noguchi N, Ishii K (2005) Remote-sensing technology for vegetation monitoring using an
unmanned helicopter. Biosyst Eng 90(4):369–379
Sung Heuk J, Hyeong Min L, Jae Kee L (2010) Acquisition of 3D spatial information using UAV pho-
togrammetric method. Korean J Geomat 28(1):161–168
Taubenbock H, Wurm M, Netzband M, Zwenzner H, Roth A, Rahman A, Dech S (2011) Flood risks in
urbanized areas: multi-sensoral approaches using remotely sensed data for risk assessment. Nat
Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:431–444
Tola E, Lepetit V, Fua P (2010) DAISY: an efficient dense descriptor applied to wide-baseline stereo. IEEE
Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(5):815–830
Vanderkimpen P, Melger E, Peeters P (2009) Flood modeling for risk evaluation: a MIKE FLOOD versus
SOBEK 1D2D benchmark study. In: Samuels P et al (eds) Flood risk management: research and
practice. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 77–84
Vârcol A (1961) Calculul debitelor maxime folosind cercetările expediţionare, Studii de Hidrologie, ISCH,
Bucureşti. p. 63–74 (in Romanian)
Vinet F (2007) Approches nationales de la prévention des risques et besoins locaux: le cas de la prévision et
de l’alerte aux crues dans le Midi méditerranéen. Géocarrefour 82(1–2):35–42
Watts AC, Kobziar LN, Percival HF (2009) Unmanned aircraft systems for wildland fire monitoring and
research. In: Proceedings of the 24th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: The Future of Fire: Public
Awareness, Health, and Safety, Tallahassee, 11–15 January 2009, pp 86–90
Watts AC, Ambrosia VG, Hinkley EA (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific
research: classification and considerations of use. Remote Sens 4:1671–1692
Zwenzner H, Voigt S (2009) Improved estimation of flood parameters by combining space based SAR data
with very high resolution digital elevation data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:567–576
123