Electing any Democrat-POTUS empowers ObamaGate Grifters – Part XV – Genesis

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archives.gov%2Ffounding-
docs%2Fconstitution&psig=AOvVaw326jZV6Xx0obiUSWUkMiYI&ust=1592358125468000&sourc
e=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCJDD2L2aheoCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD

First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.”

First, before providing additional follow-up context on ObamaGate—and why it matters—it’s

desirable to again highlight the news-summaries of “*Ace of Spades*” [7/8/2020 & 7/9/2020 &
AND c/o “*PJMedia*” [7/8/2020 & 7/9/2020 & 7/10/2020]; the perceptions conveyed continue
to be right-on regarding lotsa “hot” issues (here, regarding cancel culture and Dems’ anti-
patriotism), even as many hyperlinks overlap. {Reminder: Hyperlinks below that are surrounded
by asterisks (*) are amenable to being read in their entirety.}

I’m not alone in wondering aloud when Durham will release a report/indictments, fearful that he
may wait until AFTER the election to issue a report on the Russia probe while the coup against
Trump continues (per this weekly update c/o Judicial Watch); it has been suggested that he’s
finally preparing indictments which, obviously, is where “rubber meets road.”

It’s desirable to update Flynn, Stone, Vindman, and Manafort prior to distilling the essence of new
information emanating from Christopher Steele and the FBI; thereafter, provided is an analysis of
one Flynn-linked facet of how ObamaGate arose c/o Svetlana Lokhova, who is an Espionage
Historian.

As I predicted and proposed [noting the evolution of Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VI,
and Part XIII] per my formal judicial filing, Judge Sullivan filed a petition with the appeals court for
a "Rehearing En Banc" of the decision of the three-judge panel that had ordered him to dismiss
the case against Gen. Flynn; conservatives reflexly claim he’s humiliating himself and will be upset
when he prevails (noting the R/D political composition of the D.C. court), clearing the path for him
to implement my unique advice that he retain the case while probing the DoJ’s prosecutorial
misconduct.

As many anticipated and advocated, President Trump commuted Roger Stone’s unjust sentence
four days before the prison term had been set to begin rather than pardoning him, so that he can
continue to test the appellate system to discern if the multiple/profound judicial aberrations

1
would otherwise have forced a retrial, if not a withdrawal of the indictment (à la Flynn); true to
form, Facebook removed a large network of fake pages Roger Stone had allegedly used to post
about WikiLeaks, despite the fact that Wikileaks has denied any ties to Roger Stone noting this
chronology.

[Recall that, instead of allowing the FBI to review its allegedly-hacked server (more likely phished),
the DNC had hired CrowdStrike (which recently initiated an ad campaign); the intrigue stems from
when the FBI granted it an emergency, yearlong, no-bid contract on July 8, 2015.]

Before Alexander Vindman “retired” (blaming Trump, of course), Sen. Duckworth had threatened
to block promotions for 1,123 military officers unless SoD Esper promoted him; perhaps he could
belatedly accept the thrice-offered defense minister position (per Ukrainian officials offered him),
although it’s far more likely that partisans such as ex-US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie
Yovanovitch will invoke this factoid to attack Trump (notwithstanding the claim she lied to the
House regarding her Burisma knowledge including having met with a Burisma rep).

Paul Manafort may be next to benefit from this reversal of the Dem/media prosecutions, for a key
Mueller witness admitted the “black ledger” was probably a fake; furthermore, it appears the FBI
had been warned of this faulty foundation to his prosecution/persecution.

A British court ruled against Dossier author Christopher Steele for violated a data privacy law by
failing to check the accuracy of information in his infamous Dossier, ordering the former spy’s firm
to pay damages to two businessmen he wrongly accused of making illicit payments in Russia; note
that new Steele Dossier evidence strengthens the Durham prosecution as frustration over
inaction grows (particularly when it is recalled that legal filings can be revised/amplified):

Steele told FBI agents/handlers (from the get-go, on the first time he met them
on July 5, 2016 in London) that the “ultimate client” of his anti-Trump Russia
research was “the leadership of the Clinton presidential campaign.”

So the FBI knew immediately that the dossier it used to justify a FISA warrant
targeting the Trump campaign was a political opposition research product
designed to help Clinton defeat her Republican opponent and did not divulge the
connection.

Officials at the State Department where Hillary Clinton had served as secretary of
state were uniquely involved in Steele’s efforts to bring the Dossier to attention,
including Mrs. Clinton’s former Russia expert Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland,
Clinton's successor as secretary of state John Kerry, and Joe Biden’s former
national security adviser Tony Blinken.

After Trump won the election, Steele disclosed he gave copies of his Dossier to
longtime Clinton friend Strobe Talbot in hopes it would get to the top of the State
Department.

2
 Steele openly admitted he was leaking to the news media while working for the
FBI; one of the media outlets with which Steele talked, subsequently, was
portrayed by the FBI in the FISA warrant as an independent corroboration for his
Dossier when in fact it was circular reporting.

Steele admitted he did little to verify information he got from sources, giving the
FBI unfiltered and unvetted “dirt”; one such sampled memo contained five
factually inaccurate, unverified statements.

Nevertheless, the FBI certified to the FISA court that evidence it plucked from
Steele’s Dossier to support the FISA warrant had been “verified.”

Thus, the FISA court confirmed that the FBI had misled it, for its leadership had
withheld information it knew was highly relevant.

Lest we forget, the Steele Dossier played a “central and essential” role in the FISA applications,
amplifying ACTIONABLE concern that Declassified Intelligence Report Shows FBI Withheld Key
Details About Steele Dossier.

And regarding the aftermath of the Obama/Biden collusion meeting of 1/5/2017, the DoJ just
produced MORE evidence to Flynn's team: [1]—Handwritten notes from Strzok and former
Deputy AG Tashina Gauhar from the day after the Flynn interview (1/25/2017); [2]—An internal
DoJ memo that may have cleared Flynn (1/30/2017); and [3]—Notes of former Acting AG Dana
Boente.

The notes (and Gauhar’s calendar) indicate Gauhar met with the NSD-SCIF (National Security
Division’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility; pundits wonder whether they reviewed
the original (and missing) Flynn 302 at that meeting.

When conceptualizing the origins of RussiaGate/ObamaGate, it’s necessary to emphasize that

three people (Stefan Halper, Joseph Mifsud & Alexander Downer) appear to have been the FBI’s
major “outreach” plants when noting (per the IG Horowitz Report) the narratives of their targets
(policy advisor Carter Page, campaign advisor George Papadopolous, and high-level Trump
campaign member Sam Clovis). Reportedly, Clovis had recruited Page and Papadopolous.

Svetlana Lokhova, a Russian-born British citizen, claims she was defamed by the
Russiagate/ObamaGate narrative and, thus, has appealed her case; she is claiming Halper had
intentionally misrepresented that she was a “Russian spy” who had “had an affair with General
Flynn on the orders of Russian intelligence” and, thus, had “compromised General Flynn.”

She alleged Halper is “a dirty political operative” who set up Carter Page (while working
undercover) as they sat abreast at a small dinner at Magdalene College in Cambridge, where
(Lokhova tweeted) Halper held a lifetime fellowship; to the contrary, Page claims he met Halper
at a July seminar in Moscow.

3
Either way, she (and others) cannot perceive dispatching Halper was justified because, as per the
IG, the FBI claimed not to have used any confidential human sources prior to the July 31, 2016
launch of Crossfire Hurricane.

AndrewCMcCarthy (“who rarely shoots and misses”) confirmed Halper: ✔️Has links to
CIA/FBI ✔️Has links to MI6 ✔️Initiated meetings with Trump team officials ✔️Was in Washington
D.C. Oct 2016 when FISA spying approved on Page ✔️Is Friend/contact with multiple Hakluyt
(British strategic advisory firm) figures. McCarthy also noted his background: ✔️ U.S. Citizen based
in Britain ✔️Attended Cambridge with Bill Clinton ✔️Publicly endorsed Hilary Clinton during pre-
election interview with Sputnik.

She claimed the IG report shows that:

-Halper was an FBI Informer on the realDonaldTrump campaign

-Halper was previously fired by the FBI for cause
-Halper was assessed by the FBI as aggressive, unstable, greedy, with
“questionable allegiance”
-Halper targeted numerous Trump campaign members including Flynn, Sam
Clovis, Page, Papadopoulos, Manafort
-Halper wore a wire
-Halper withheld exculpatory evidence
-Halper was acting as an agent provocateur
-Halper was paid by the FBI for his activities.

She feels “We have a long way to go to bring Halper to account [because we] need to know”:

-Who sent Halper to manufacture evidence against Flynn in summer 2015?

-Who signed off on $700,000 of payments to Halper between 2015-2016?
-Who sent Halper to Cambridge in winter 2016 to spy on [her]?
-Who ordered Halper to use [her] chance encounter with Flynn in 2014 to spread
lies about the General and [her] around Cambridge University in 2016?
-Why was Flynn and [her] under surveillance in 2016?
-What really happened at the July 2016 SpyGate conference in Cambridge?
-Who authorized Halper to spread lies that [she was] a Russian spy who
seduced Flynn on behalf of Russian intelligence to the media in December 2016,
just as General was being appointed to the NSA by realDonaldTrump?
-Who authorized David Ignatius of WaPo to use Halper as source?
-Why did Ignatius fly to England to dig dirt on Flynn and [her] in Feb 2017, within
a month of getting an order from Clapper to take a kill shot on Flynn?
-Who authorized Halper to brief NYT, WSJ, WaPo, Guardian on the same day that
[she was] a Russian spy who seduced Flynn?
-Why are Dems protecting Halper, represented by Democrat donor Luskin?
-Why is the FBI still protecting Halper and allow him to claim government
immunity?
-What’s the precise relationship between Halper and CIA?
-Is Halper a source for Steele?
-Is Halper a source for CIA?

4
In any case, as ObamaGate evidence mounts, other manifestations of this attempted coup
intensify; as we await Durham, know that the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs FINALLY authorized its chairman to issue subpoenas as part of an inquiry
into the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign.

{Author’s Note: Hyperlinks in this piece eschew those that have not met criteria established by
NewsGuard; to facilitate review, they are provided separately.}