Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

The main points which have to include into the petition:-

1. That complainant had made a written complaint against intekal no 4240/1 made
before upmandal nagrik adhikari dated 2/04/2014. after the inquiry the said office
stated that intekal 2426, 2427 , 2428 and 2067 which had mutated, the said office
decide that the court should have intervene and declare that , and said office can not
take any decision without the court orders.

2. In the mean time the complainant filed the complaint before the police adhikshek
jhajjar dated 22/01/2014 regarding the above said mutation. the order of inquiry by
police adhikshek transferred to the economic cell Sp office jhajjar,the inspector
satnarayan inquired into the matter and declared the complaint bogs and state the
intekal is mutated correctly and the report which has submitted to Sp given on
15/01/2014.

3. After that the complainant filed the said appeal before the ADC atrikt upayukt
jhajjar, but the ADC office did not give any regards to the complainant and find that,
the matter should be hear before the civil court because this matter is the civil
matter. Dated 23/01/2015.

4. After that the complainant filed the said appeal before the DC office and without
the inquiry the DC office give as a small punishment and restrict the two increments
of the hariom kanoongo.

5. After that the hariom kanoongo filed the appeal of that punishment before the
commissioner office rohtak and after inquiry into the matter the DC office stated that
the 6 patwaris also provide there service after the hariom kanoongo and stated that
the said mutations are good to go. The said office stated that those 6 patwaris also
provide the copy of said mutation to the complainant time to time, stated that the
satbir patwari gave the copy of that mutation to the complainant. where the said
office declared non guilty to the hariom kanoongo and rewards two increments
which restricted by DC office jhajjar.

6. After that in the mean time the complainant filed complaint no. 416/2014 before
the lokayukat. The lakayut office gave its decision on dated 04/02/2019 without
keeping in mind the order of commissioner and other orders, stated that the fir has
to be filed against the hariom kanoongo and the inquiry has to be taken against the
hariom kanoongo. This order is arbitrary in nature because the said order was give
without keeping in mind the past orders.

7. After that the DC office jhajjar seek direction from the district attorney and the
district attorney stated that before taking the decision the office or department
should take the opinion of the advocate general. After that the office DC jhajjar send
the order to the AG and seek his/her opinion, the opinion of the said office stated
that the final direction should be take after the signature of the CM the competent
authority. After the signature or the approval by the competent authority the office
can follow the said recommendation of the lakayukat office and can able to file the
fir.

8. After that the complainant filed the fir against the hariom kanoongo because of
the personal profit without the maturity of said recommendation . According to that
fir the DC office give arbitrary retirnment to the hariom kanoongo and restrict his all
financial helps because of the pending cases that is lokayukat recommendation .

9. The haryana gov. By it circular give directions to the administrated offices that if a
government employ became 70 % handicap then he is liable to enjoy or serve 2 more
years after the age of 58 but the DC jhajjar office gave arbitrary order and declared
that the hariom kanoongo is not liable to serve for 2 more years and office does not
provide any kind of financial help to the hariom kanoongo because of pending cases.

10. After that the hariom kanoongo filed the appeal before the commissioner rohtak
against that order of DC office but did not take any profit by that appeal.

11. After that the hariom kanoongo filed rti seeking the pending cases against him
and office by revert give the information about the cases, that is only the lokayukt
case.

12. Also the hariom kanoongo filed the appeal against the lokayukat
recommendation before the high court which is pending because the said
recommendation is not mature at now because the CM did not sign the said
recommendation . By which we can say that the order of the DC office jhajjar gave
wrong and arbitrary order and it should be stand dismissed.

Вам также может понравиться