Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Contents
Volume 89 www.sensorsportal.com ISSN 1726-5479
Issue 3
March 2008
Research Articles
Artificially Controlling the Limb Movement of Robotic Arm Using Machine Interface with
EMG Sensor
Govind Singh Patel, Amrita Rai and Dr. S. Prasad ............................................................................ 39
Leak Detection and Model Analysis for Nonlinear Spherical Tank Process Using
Conductivity Sensor
P. Madhavasarma, S. Sundaram ....................................................................................................... 71
Authors are encouraged to submit article in MS Word (doc) and Acrobat (pdf) formats by e-mail: editor@sensorsportal.com
Please visit journal’s webpage with preparation instructions: http://www.sensorsportal.com/HTML/DIGEST/Submition.htm
Abstract: This report demonstrates the design of closed-loop micro accelerometer sensor. Proposed
sensor consists of a polysilicon cantilever micro beam as a proof mass and uses the extreme sensitivity
of electron tunneling to variations in electrode separation as sensing element of the sensor. The model
uses piezoelectric forces as an actuating element to control the separation between the tunneling
electrodes with a low voltage due to large piezoelectric constant. In order to have a proper response
time a Fuzzy controller is considered which can be very useful, fast, and reliable. The inputs for the
mentioned controller are tunneling current error, gradient of the tunneling current and the summation
of errors. And the output is the piezoelectric voltage. Due to the simulation and its results, it is seen
that the proposed micro accelerometer have high linearity and dynamic range and also have good
respond to the step and sinusoidal acceleration. Copyright © 2008 IFSA.
1. Introduction
Miniaturization has been one of the most important technological trends in the last decades.
Microminiaturization of mechanical components was started from the microfabricated sensors and was
followed by microfabricated parts, such as beams and membranes, and microactuators. In recent years
the integration of microelectronics, micromechanisms, microsensors and microactuators into
microsystems has become one of the most prominent research areas all over the world.
17
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
One kind of micro sensors is micro accelerometers. Accelerometers measure acceleration, vibration
and shock. Commonly there is a proof mass in accelerometers that acceleration affects it, and with
respect to its movement and its mass, acceleration will be measured. The difference between
accelerometers comes from its structure and method of sensing and actuating corresponding with
acceleration. At the heart of MEMS accelerometer is the micro-mechanical structure which, due to the
acceleration, alters its stiffness, mass or shape. Micro-mechanical elements are typically attached to the
substrate, e.g. with supporting beams or tethers [1, 2].
There are various kinds of measurement mechanisms of the accelerometers, like capacitive,
piezoelectric, piezoresistive, tunneling current and so on. One of the most sensitive and recent
accelerometers are based on the variation of tunneling current. Tunneling accelerometer has three
advantages: one is the super sensitivity caused by the exponential relation between the tunneling
current and the distance. The second is that its sensitivity reduction due to the volume reduction is less
than capacitive devices because the sensitive area is smaller than 1µ m 2 . The third is that the feedback
circuit is simpler than that of a capacitive accelerometer [3-14].
MEMS accelerometers are founded in open-loop and close-loop mode. For static/low frequency
applications, which do not require a high degree of accuracy, they can be used in open-loop
(compensated or uncompensated) but for higher precision applications, negative feedback must be
used to increase linearity, bandwidth and dynamic range. Nowadays researches in close-loop
accelerometer are focused on increasing the dynamic range and bandwidth and decreasing noise
effects, and designing better controller that have good response to different external accelerations such
as step and sinusoidal acceleration. For the closed-loop accelerometer, it has to be noted that an
actuation mechanism is needed. These mechanisms are mainly based on electrostatic, magnetic,
thermal or piezoelectric actuation.
Closed loop accelerometers are mostly based on the PID controllers, since using of Fuzzy controllers
or combination of common controllers corresponding with Fuzzy controller aren’t attracted much
attention from the scientific community. The Fuzzy Logic Control uses the qualitative aspects of the
human decision process to construct the control algorithm. The Fuzzy Logic Control achieved all the
goals that the PID and sliding mode control are normally used to achieve. For the last 20 years, Fuzzy
Control Theory has emerged as a fruitful approach to a wide variety of control problems. Fuzzy logic
was first proposed by Lotfi A. Zadeh of the University of California at Berkeley in a 1965 paper[16] ;
he elaborated on his ideas in a 1973 paper that introduced the concept of "linguistic variables" [17]. In
his approach, a Fuzzy implication is defined as a Fuzzy Cartesian product. Based on Zadeh's definition
of implication, Mamdani built the first fuzzy logic controller [18]. Such controller may be used in
various mechanisms, for instance it can be used in micro accelerometer.
Fuzzy controllers use the linguistic rules for controlling systems, so it is quite suitable for the unknown
or non-linear systems that could not be controlled easily with classical control approach like PID
18
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
controller to achieving desired purpose. Fuzzy controllers also have better performance from other
control methods, if well designed. Combining Fuzzy controllers with other classical method lead to
robustness controller such as PID-Fuzzy controller.
In this paper a new closed-loop micro accelerometer with a pair of piezoelectric layers is presented
which has the characteristic of low actuation voltage to the piezoelectric layers, high sensitivity due to
the tunneling measurement, and high linear range to measure the acceleration by means of the closed-
loop mechanism. The accelerometer is modeled into a lump model. Piezoelectric layers is used to
apply a oppose moment to control the displacement of the micro accelerometer which cause to
increase the range of the measurement corresponding to low actuation voltage. The PID-Fuzzy
controller is applied in order to control the actuation voltage to the piezoelectric layers. The obtained
results prove the characteristics of the proposed micro accelerometer are highly acceptable.
As it is shown in the Fig. 1, assume a beam with thickness h , width w , length L , density ρ and
isotropic with Young’s modulus E that has piezoelectric layers bonded on its top and bottom surfaces.
The piezoelectric layers are located throughout the beam length. And have thickness h1 , density ρ 0 ,
Young’s modulus E P and equivalent piezoelectric coefficient for one-dimensional problem e31 .
Suppose that y is the coordinate along the length of the beam with its origin at the left end, and u ( y ) is
the deflection of the beam, defined to be positive downward.
Microbeams are usually modeled as continuous and prismatic straight beams, made of elastic and
homogeneous material [19], with principal axes of elasticity equally directed for all sections. The
above assumption allows uncoupling flexural, torsional and axial behaviors. Since the flexural
behavior is here mainly considered, transverse displacement and rotation are suitable to write
equilibrium equations.
For preliminary analysis, as it is shown in Fig. 2 a low-order model is considered by assimilating the
micro accelerometer to a system with lumped parameters.
19
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
The dynamic equation for the micro accelerometer can be written as:
whereas m is the proof mass, b is the damping coefficient, k is the equivalent stiffness, a is the
external acceleration impose to the system and F p is the equivalent force of the piezoelectric layers.
Without considering shear strain of the beam, based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, the
equivalent stiffness for a cantilever beam can be written as:
3EI
k= , (2)
L3
wh 3
where I = is the moment of inertia of the cross-sectional area. For a wide beam, for which
12
~ E ~
w ≥ 5h , the effective modulus E can be approximated by the plate modulus , otherwise E is
(1 − υ )
2
With considering the first mode for the vibration of the micro cantilever beam, the equivalent mass can
be expressed as:
m ϕ& 2 ( L) L 1
=∫ ρ Aϕ& 2 ( y ) dy , (3)
2 0 2
where ϕ is the first mode shape of a cantilever beam, A is the cross sectional area and ρ is the beam
density.
20
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
There are two sources of mechanical damping: the structural damping: and the viscous damping by gas
flow. The damping in the high Q materials (i.e. CMOS MEMS) is very low. Thus, damping in mainly
MEMS devices caused by viscous flow gas of surrounding the micro structures.
Damping coefficient can be varies with mechanical properties and dominate pressure in accelerometer.
The dominant damping mechanism in lateral accelerometer is squeeze-film damping. For rectangular
plate, the damping coefficient is based on the evaluations by [20], namely:
96 µ L w 3
b= ,
π 4 (g 0 − x )
3 (4)
where g 0 is the initial Gap or initial distance between plate and the ground and µ is the viscosity of
the gas.
The stress in the piezoelectric layer accounting for electro-mechanical effects can be expressed as [21]:
d 2u
σ y = −EP z − e31 E e , (5)
dy 2
where the over-bar represents the parameters in the piezoelectric layer and E e is the electric field in
the piezoelectric layer which is E e = VP / hP . In this model, two piezoelectric layers are bounded top
and bottom through out the length of the beam. The forces in the piezoelectric layers are opposed to
each other direction due to the difference direction of applied voltage to the each piezoelectric layers
V p . The applied force by piezoelectric layers as pointed out by [21] can be written as:
⎛ d 2u ⎞ h / 2+ h p ⎛ d 2u ⎞
⎜ − EP z − e31 (−VP / hP ) ⎟bdz
h/2
P=∫ ⎜⎜ − Ez 2 ⎟⎟bdz + ∫
−h / 2
⎝ dy ⎠ h/2 ⎜ dy 2 ⎟
⎝ ⎠
, (6)
−h / 2 ⎛ d 2u ⎞
+∫ ⎜ − E P z 2 − e31 (VP / hP ) ⎟bdz = 0
−h / 2−h p ⎜ dy ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎛ d 2u ⎞ h / 2+ h p ⎛ d 2u ⎞
z − E P z 2 − e31 (−VP / hP ) ⎟bdz ,
⎜
h/2
M y = 2∫ z ⎜⎜ − Ez 2 ⎟⎟bdz + 2∫ (7)
0
⎝ dy ⎠ h/2 ⎜ dy ⎟
⎝ ⎠
2
~ d u d 2u
M y = − EI 2 − E P I P 2 + M p , (8)
dy dy
21
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
bhP3 h + hP 2
whereas M P = e31VP b(h + h p ) and I P = 2( + bhP ( ) ) . Therefore, the bending moment can be
12 2
written as follow:
d 2 u( y)
M y = −η +Mp, (9)
dy 2
~
whereas η = EI + E P I P . To determine the equivalent piezoelectric force, the other forces on the beam
are neglected. This can be written as: M y = 0 . Thus the equivalent piezoelectric force which is
accounted for the lump model can be expressed as:
F p = k u (L) , (10)
where u (L) is the tip displacement of the micro accelerometer due to the piezoelectric moment.
Tunneling current ( I t ) is a reference for sensing beam deflection. The relationship between I t and
distance between tunneling tip and conductive surface is given by:
(
I t = Vb exp − α I s )
Φ , with s = g 0 − x (11)
where Vb is tunneling bias across electrode gap, α I = 1.025(A o −1eV −0.5 ) is a constant, s is tunneling gap
and Φ is the effective height of the tunneling barrier. According to experimental results, the effective
barrier height is considered as: Φ = 0.1685 [22].
Sensor measures acceleration with respect to variation of tunneling current. A Controller has been
designed to make beam position zero, this can be achieved with applying voltage to piezoelectric
layers. This voltage is the sensor output which is used to calculate input acceleration. The gain that
must be multiplied to piezoelectric voltage to calculate the input acceleration can be obtained from
sensor simulation and tests. The block diagram of the closed-loop system is shown in the Fig. 3:
Fuzzy controller is developed to control the beam deflection about its static position, and increase the
sensor measuring range. The fuzzy control system generates the control action from a set of rules
22
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
representing the heuristic knowledge about the plant to be controlled [23]. Fuzzy controller consists off
three steps:
1- Fuzzification
2- Rule base decision
3- Defuzzification
A crisp data as input is converted to degree of membership for any linguistic condition by a look up in
one or several membership functions. Decision makes by rule base part that includes IF-THEN rule
created by expert knowledge. And defuzzification gives a crisp data for output from fuzzy outputs.
The input of the designed controller is based on tunneling current, gradient of tunneling current and
summation of errors and the piezoelectric voltage is the output. The input and output membership
functions are shown in Fig. 4. and Fig. 5, respectively. Tunneling current changes exponentially due to
the tunneling gap, so this sensor has different behavior for positive and negative acceleration. For the
equal negative and positive acceleration, if the controller rules are the same for those accelerations,
larger deflection would be obtained for the negative acceleration than the positive one. Therefore, in
this design has been tried to have a better performance for the negative acceleration, so current
memberships designed exact symmetric to beam deflection not to tunneling current.
NL NS ZO PS PL NL NS ZO PS PL
1 1
0.8 0.8
Degree of membership
Degree of membership
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
NL NS ZO PS PL
1
0.8
Degree of membership
0.6
0.4
0.2
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
integral of current errors
23
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
NH NL NS ZO PS PL PH NL NS ZO PS PL
1 1
0.8 0.8
Degree of membership
Degree of membership
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
-0.01 -0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 piezoelectric's voltage
piezoelectric's voltage -3
x 10
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. Output membership functions, a) for PD controller Output, b) for D and I controllers.
Labels NH, NL, NS, ZO, PS, PL and PH represent the negative huge, negative large, negative small,
zero, positive small, positive large and positive huge respectively.
IF (P, D) THEN V,
where P and D are fuzzy sets for current and gradient of the current as inputs and V is output fuzzy set
to determine output voltage.
PID Fuzzy controller designed as three separate controllers, that output voltage for piezoelectric comes
from summation of this controllers. It has been in this way to have a good adjustment for the fuzzy
controller to achieve best performance. First is a D controller for removing oscillation, second is PD
controller, cause to minimizing deflection and third is I controller to make deflection about zero.
To achieve desired voltage, the rules of D, PD, and I controller are shown in Table 1, 2 and 3. PD
controller uses the min intersection operator and all controllers use centroid method for
defuzzification.
dI NL NS ZO PS PL
V NL NS ZO PS PL
I
NL NS ZO PS PL
dI
NL PL PL ZO ZO ZO
NS PL PS ZO NS NS
ZO PS PS ZO NS NS
PS PS PS ZO NS NL
PL ZO ZO ZO NL NL
24
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
∑ (I − I 0 ) NL NS ZO PS PL
V NL NS ZO PS PL
Defuzzifier factors, KD, KPD and KI were used to easily tune the effect of each controller.
Table 4. Geometrical and material properties of the MEM actuator and piezoelectric layers.
Step response of sensor for applied acceleration 5 g and -5 g shows in Fig. 6. As it can be seen, sensor
responses are different for the positive and negative acceleration, although have a robust behavior in
negative acceleration. Deflection is very small (about 1 A o ) and Response time is about 25 µs.
Controller's outputs are shown in Fig. 7 for applied acceleration 5g, and -5g, respectively.
Behavior of system due to harmonic accelerations simulated with maximum acceleration of 5 g for
30 KHz and 50 g for 1 KHz. As can be seen, this sensor has good results in harmonic acceleration with
considering its relative lower deflection (Fig.8-11).
25
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
-11 deflection of beam for step acceleration input
x 10
10
+5g
-5g
8
deflection
2
-2
-4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
time x 10
-4
-4
x 10 pizoeelectric voltage
1.5
1 5g
-5g
0.5
pizeoelectric voltage [V]
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
time x 10
-4
-11
x 10 deflection of beam for step acceleration input
8
2
deflection
-2
-4
26
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
-4
x 10 pizoeelectric voltage
1.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
time -4
x 10
0
deflection
-2
-4
-6
-8
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
time x 10
-3
-3
x 10 pizoeelectric voltage
1.5
1
pizeoelectric voltage [V]
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
time x 10
-3
27
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
As it is shown in Fig. 12, the Linearity of the designed sensor is about << 1%.
-4
x 10
2
voltage [V] 0
-1
-2
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
input acceleration [g]
Conclusion
The primary of this work was to demonstrate a micro accelerometer with high sensitivity due to
exponential relationship between tunneling electrodes and tunneling current. And use very low
controlling voltage due to large piezoelectric constant. Because of a highly fast, reliable and precise
controller was needed, the Fuzzy controller was implemented. The simulation results showed that the
proposed micro accelerometer can be used for a 5g and -5g step acceleration with a 25 µs response
time without contacting the tunneling electrodes. And also can be used for measuring a harmonic
acceleration with 5 g, 30 KHz and 50 g, 1 KHz.
References
[1]. F. E. Tay, J. Xu, and V. Logeeswaren, A differential capacitive low-g microaccelerometer with mg
resolution, Sensors and Actuators A, 86, 2000, pp. 45–51.
[2]. G. Li, Z. Li, C. Wang, Y. Hao, T. Li, D. Zhang and G. Wu, Design and fabrication of a highly symmetrical
capacitive triaxial accelerometer, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 11, 2001, pp. 48–54.
[3]. A. A. Baski, et al., Tunneling accelerometer, J. Microsc., 152, 1988, pp. 73–79.
[4]. R. L. Kubena, et al., A new miniaturized surface micromachined tunneling accelerometer, IEEE Electr.
Device Lett., 17, 1996, pp. 306–308.
[5]. H. K. Rockstad, et al., A miniature, high-sensitivity, electron tunneling accelerometer, Sens. Actuators A,
531, 1996, pp. 227–231.
[6]. M. A. Pusateri, et al., A force rebalance accelerometer for an atmospheric weather probe, in Proceedings of
the American Control Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA, June, 1997, pp. 816–820.
[7]. P. M. Zavracky, Design and process considerations for a tunneling tip accelerometer, J. Micromech.
Microeng., 6, 1996, pp. 352–358.
[8]. P. R. Scheeper, et al., Development of a modal analysis accelerometer based on a tunneling displacement
transducer, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago,
June 16–19, 1997, pp. 867–871.
[9]. C. -H. Liu, T. W. Kenny, A high-precision, wide-bandwidth micromachined tunneling accelerometer, J.
Microelectromech. Syst., 10, 2001, pp. 425–433.
28
Sensors & Transducers Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 3, March 2008, pp. 17-29
[10].C. -H. Liu, et al., Characterization of a high-sensitivity micromachined tunneling accelerometer with
micro-g resolution, J. Microelectromech. Syst., 7, 1998, pp. 235–245.
[11].C. Yeh, K. Najafi, A low-voltage tunneling-based silicon microaccelerometer, IEEE Trans. Electr.
Devices, 44, 1997, pp. 1875–1882.
[12].C. Yeh, K. Najafi, CMOS interface circuitry for a low-voltage micromachined tunneling accelerometer, J.
Microelectromech. Syst., 7, 1998, pp. 6–16.
[13].J. Wang, et al., Synthesis of the modeling and control systems of a tunneling accelerometer using the
Matlab simulation, Micromech. Microeng., 12, 2002, pp. 730–735.
[14].T. W. Kenney, et al., Micromachined silicon tunnel sensor for motion detection, Appl. Phys. Lett., 58,
1991, pp. 100–103.
[15].Gh. Rezazadeh, A. Tahmasebi and Mikhail Zubtsov, Application of Piezoelectric Layers in Electrostatic
MEM Actuators: Controlling of Pull-in Voltage, Journal of Microsystem Technologies, Vol. 12, No. 12,
2006, pp. 1163-1170.
[16].Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy Sets and Systems. In Fox, J., ed., Proceedings Symposium on System Theory,
Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, April 1965, pp. 29-37.
[17].L. A. Zadeh, Outline of a new Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Process, IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, 1973, pp. 28-44.
[18].E. H. Mamdani, Fuzzy Sets for Man - Machine Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Computer, Vol. 26,
1977, pp. 1182-1191.
[19].G. Genta, Vibration of Structures and Machines, SpringerVerlag, 2000.
[20].Philip W. Barth, et al, A Monolithic Silicon Accelerometer With Integral Air Damping and Overange
Protection, IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, June 1988, pp. 35- 38.
[21].E. F. Crawley and J. de Luis, Use of Piezoelectric Actuators as Elements of Intelligent Structures, AIAA
Journal, 25, 10, 1987, pp. 1373-1385.
[22].Tianhong Cui and Jing Wang, Polymer-Based Wide-Bandwidth and High-Sensitivity Micromachined
Electron Tunneling Accelerometers Using Hot Embossing, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems,
Vol. 14, No. 5, October 2005.
[23].Liu, Y., Gordaninejad, F., Evrensel, C. A., Hitchcock, G., Wang, X., Variable Structure System Based
Fuzzy Logic Control of Bridge Vibration Using Fail-Safe Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers,
Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Smart Materials and Structures, San Diego, March 2002.
___________________
29
Sensors & Transducers Journal
Sensors & Transducers Journal (ISSN 1726-5479) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology
of physical, chemical sensors and biosensors. It publishes state-of-the-art reviews, regular research and
application specific papers, short notes, letters to Editor and sensors related books reviews as well as
academic, practical and commercial information of interest to its readership. Because it is an open access, peer
review international journal, papers rapidly published in Sensors & Transducers Journal will receive a very high
publicity. The journal is published monthly as twelve issues per annual by International Frequency Association
(IFSA). In additional, some special sponsored and conference issues published annually.
Topics Covered
Contributions are invited on all aspects of research, development and application of the science and technology
of sensors, transducers and sensor instrumentations. Topics include, but are not restricted to:
Submission of papers
Articles should be written in English. Authors are invited to submit by e-mail editor@sensorsportal.com 6-14
pages article (including abstract, illustrations (color or grayscale), photos and references) in both: MS Word
(doc) and Acrobat (pdf) formats. Detailed preparation instructions, paper example and template of manuscript
are available from the journal’s webpage: http://www.sensorsportal.com/HTML/DIGEST/Submition.htm Authors
must follow the instructions strictly when submitting their manuscripts.
Advertising Information
Advertising orders and enquires may be sent to sales@sensorsportal.com Please download also our media kit:
http://www.sensorsportal.com/DOWNLOADS/Media_Kit_2008.pdf