Gabion Analysis Input Data: Project

Dimensionare zid gabioane sprijinire rambleu platforma H=3m
Cuculici Robert
Gabion analysis
Input data
Project
Task : Dimensionare zid gabioane sprijinire rambleu platforma H=3m
Author : Cuculici Robert
Date : 5/22/2020

Name : Project Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
10.00
+x
1.00
1.00 1.00 3.00
4
1.00 3.00
+z
3.50 1.50
3
0.2000
1.00
0.25 2.00
+z
2
0.70 2.50 0.50
0.1000
0.20 1
0.10 0.10
Settings
Romania - EN 1997 - constructii (SR EN 1990:2004/NA:2006) (4)
Wall analysis
Active earth pressure calculation : Coulomb
Passive earth pressure calculation : Caquot-Kerisel
Earthquake analysis : Mononobe-Okabe
Shape of earth wedge : Calculate as skew
Allowable eccentricity : 0.333
Verification methodology : according to EN 1997
Design approach : 1 - reduction of actions and soil parameters
Partial factors on actions (A)
Permanent design situation
Combination 1 Combination 2
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
Permanent actions : G = 1.35 [–] 1.00 [–] 1.00 [–] 1.00 [–]
Variable actions : Q = 1.50 [–] 0.00 [–] 1.30 [–] 0.00 [–]
Water load : w = 1.35 [–] 1.00 [–]
Partial factors for soil parameters (M)

Combination 1 Combination 2
1
[GeoStructural Analysis - Gabion Wall | version 5.19.5.0 | Copyright © 2015 Fine spol. s r.o. All Rights Reserved | www.finesoftware.eu]
Cuculici Robert

Partial factor on internal friction :  = 1.00 [–] 1.25 [–]
Partial factor on effective cohesion : c = 1.00 [–] 1.25 [–]
Partial factor on undrained shear strength : cu = 1.00 [–] 1.40 [–]
Partial factor on Poisson's ratio : v = 1.00 [–] 1.00 [–]
Partial factors for variable actions

Factor for combination value : 0 = 0.70 [–]
Factor for frequent value : 1 = 0.50 [–]
Factor for quasi-permanent value : 2 = 0.30 [–]
Material of blocks - filling
  c
No. Name
[kN/m3] [°] [kPa]
1 Material No. 1 18.00 35.00 0.00
2 Material No. 2 24.00 50.00 0.00
Material of blocks - mesh
Strength Spacing of Bear.cap.
No. Name overh. vert. meshes of front joint
Rt [kN/m] v [m] Rs [kN/m]
1 Material No. 1 210.00 1.00 210.00
2 Material No. 2 210.00 1.00 210.00
Geometry of structure
Width Height Offset
No. Material
b [m] h [m] a [m]
4 1.00 1.00 0.00 Material No. 1
3 1.50 1.00 0.00 Material No. 1
2 2.00 1.00 0.25 Material No. 1
1 2.50 0.50 - Material No. 2
Gabion slope = 0.00 °
Overall height = 3.50 m
Overall wall volume = 5.75 m 3/m

2
Cuculici Robert
Name : Geometry Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
1.00
1.00
4
1.00
3.50 1.50
3
1.00
0.25 2.00
2
2.50 0.50
1
Soil parameters
Well graded grave (GW), medium dense
Unit weight :  = 18.00 kN/m3
Stress-state : effective
Angle of internal friction : ef = 31.00 °
Cohesion of soil : cef = 0.00 kPa
Angle of friction struc.-soil :  = 17.00 °
Soil : cohesionless
Saturated unit weight : sat = 18.00 kN/m3

Silty sand (SM)
Angle of friction struc.-soil :  = 17.00 °
Soil : cohesionless

Geological profile and assigned soils
Layer
No. Assigned soil Pattern
[m]
1 3.00 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense
2 - Silty sand (SM)
Foundation
Type of foundation : strip foundation
Soil of foundation - Well graded grave (GW), medium dense
3
Cuculici Robert
Geometry
Foundation thickness h = 0.20 m
Offset left bl = 0.10 m
Offset right bp = 0.10 m
Terrain profile
Terrain behind the structure is flat.

Water influence
Ground water table is located below the structure.

Input surface surcharges
Surcharge Mag.1 Mag.2 Ord.x Length Depth
No. Action
new change [kN/m2] [kN/m2] x [m] l [m] z [m]
1 YES variable 10.00 1.00 3.00 on terrain
No. Name
1 suprasarcina
Resistance on front face of the structure
Resistance on front face of the structure: 1/2 pass., 1/2 at rest
Soil on front face of the structure - Silty sand (SM)
Angle of friction struc.-soil  = 17.00 °
Soil thickness in front of structure h = 0.70 m
Terrain in front of structure is flat.

Earthquake
Factor of horizontal acceleration Kh = 0.2000
Factor of vertical acceleration Kv = 0.1000
Water below the GWT is free.
Specific gravity of soil particles Gs = 2.50.

Settings of the stage of construction
Design situation : permanent

Verification No. 1
Passive pressure on front face of the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  d Kp Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.20 0.00 21.00 8.00 19.00 -17.00 3.158
2 0.00 89.69(21.00) 21.00 8.00 19.00 -17.00 2.140 MODIFIED
3 0.50 0.00 21.00 8.00 19.00 -17.00 3.158
Passive pressure distribution on front face of the structure
Layer Start [m] Z W Pressure Hor. comp. Vert. comp.
No. End [m] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa]
0.00 0.00 0.00 28.43 27.19 -8.31
1
0.20 3.80 0.00 40.43 38.66 -11.82
0.20 3.80 0.00 31.54 9.38 30.11
2
0.20 3.83 0.00 31.60 9.40 30.16
0.20 3.83 0.00 40.51 38.74 -11.84
3
0.70 13.30 0.00 70.43 67.35 -20.59
4
Cuculici Robert
Pressure at rest on front face of the structure - partial results

Layer Thickness  d cd  Kr Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 0.20 0.00 21.00 8.00 19.00 0.642
2 0.00 89.69(80.00) 21.00 8.00 19.00 0.642 MODIFIED
3 0.50 0.00 21.00 8.00 19.00 0.642
Pressure at rest distribution on front face of the structure
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.20 3.80 0.00 2.44 2.44 0.00
0.20 3.80 0.00 3.77 0.42 3.74
2
0.20 3.83 0.00 3.79 0.43 3.77
0.20 3.83 0.00 2.45 2.45 0.00
3
0.70 13.30 0.00 8.53 8.53 0.00
Active pressure behind the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  d Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.12 0.00 31.00 0.00 18.00 17.00 0.288
2 0.88 29.50 31.00 0.00 18.00 31.00 0.650
3 0.12 0.00 31.00 0.00 18.00 17.00 0.288
4 0.88 29.50 31.00 0.00 18.00 31.00 0.650
5 0.56 0.00 31.00 0.00 18.00 17.00 0.288
6 0.44 29.50 31.00 0.00 18.00 31.00 0.650
7 0.50 0.00 21.00 8.00 19.00 17.00 0.416
Active pressure distribution behind the structure (without surcharge)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.12 2.09 0.00 0.60 0.58 0.18
0.12 2.09 0.00 1.36 0.67 1.18
2
1.00 18.00 0.00 11.70 5.76 10.18
1.00 18.00 0.00 5.19 4.96 1.52
3
1.12 20.09 0.00 5.79 5.54 1.69
1.12 20.09 0.00 13.06 6.43 11.37
4
2.00 36.00 0.00 23.40 11.52 20.37
2.00 36.00 0.00 10.38 9.92 3.03
5
2.56 46.05 0.00 13.27 12.69 3.88
2.56 46.05 0.00 29.93 14.74 26.05
6
3.00 54.00 0.00 35.10 17.28 30.55
3.00 54.00 0.00 13.21 12.64 3.86
7
3.50 63.50 0.00 17.16 16.41 5.02
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results
Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 0.12 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.288 0.458 0.170
2 0.88 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.650 1.063 0.413
5
Cuculici Robert

No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
3 0.12 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.288 0.458 0.170
4 0.88 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.650 1.063 0.413
5 0.56 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.288 0.458 0.170
6 0.44 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.650 1.063 0.413
7 0.50 21.00 0.00 12.53 0.416 0.658 0.242
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure)
Layer Start [m] Z D Pressure Hor. comp. Vertical comp.
0.00 0.00 57.15 9.72 9.29 2.84
1
0.12 1.88 55.27 9.40 8.99 2.75
0.12 1.88 55.27 22.80 11.23 19.85
2
1.00 16.20 40.95 16.90 8.32 14.71
1.00 16.20 40.95 6.96 6.66 2.04
3
1.12 18.08 39.07 6.64 6.35 1.94
1.12 18.08 39.07 16.12 7.94 14.03
4
2.00 32.40 24.75 10.21 5.03 8.89
2.00 32.40 24.75 4.21 4.03 1.23
5
2.56 41.44 15.71 2.67 2.55 0.78
2.56 41.44 15.71 6.48 3.19 5.64
6
3.00 48.60 8.55 3.53 1.74 3.07
3.00 48.60 8.55 2.07 1.98 0.61
7
3.50 57.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pressure profile due to surcharge - suprasarcina
Point Depth Hor. comp. Vert. comp.
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.12 0.00 0.00
4 0.60 0.00 0.00
5 0.60 1.41 2.49
6 1.00 1.37 2.43
7 1.00 2.76 0.84
8 1.12 2.74 0.84
9 1.12 1.36 2.41
10 2.00 1.29 2.27
11 2.00 2.58 0.79
12 2.56 2.47 0.76
13 2.56 1.23 2.17
14 3.00 1.19 2.11
15 3.00 3.44 1.05
16 3.50 3.27 1.00
Forces acting on construction - combination 1
Name Fhor App.Pt. Fvert App.Pt. Coeff. Coeff. Coeff.
[kN/m] z [m] [kN/m] x [m] overtur. sliding stress
Weight - wall 0.00 -1.36 111.00 1.11 1.000 1.000 1.350
Earthq.- constr. 22.20 -1.36 -11.10 1.11 1.000 1.000 1.000
6
Cuculici Robert

FF resistance -18.02 -0.29 -5.03 0.05 1.000 1.000 1.000
Weight - earth wedge 0.00 -0.65 0.99 2.33 1.000 1.000 1.350
Earthquake - soil wedge 0.20 -0.65 -0.10 2.33 1.000 1.000 1.000
Active pressure 32.07 -1.22 35.90 2.12 1.350 1.350 1.350
Earthq.- act.pressure 19.61 -2.33 28.59 1.74 1.000 1.000 1.000
suprasarcina 5.67 -1.25 5.04 2.07 1.500 1.500 1.500
Verification of complete wall
Check for overturning stability
Resisting moment Mres = 292.75 kNm/m
Overturning moment Movr = 137.92 kNm/m
Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip

Resisting horizontal force Hres = 112.68 kN/m
Active horizontal force Hact = 77.37 kN/m
Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY
Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY
Maximum stress in footing bottom : 129.53 kPa

Passive pressure on front face of the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  d Kp Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.20 0.00 17.07 6.40 19.00 -13.82 2.468
2 0.00 89.69(17.07) 17.07 6.40 19.00 -13.82 1.918 MODIFIED
3 0.50 0.00 17.07 6.40 19.00 -13.82 2.468
Passive pressure distribution on front face of the structure
0.00 0.00 0.00 20.11 19.53 -4.80
1
0.20 3.80 0.00 29.49 28.63 -7.04
0.20 3.80 0.00 25.02 6.11 24.26
2
0.20 3.83 0.00 25.07 6.12 24.31
0.20 3.83 0.00 29.55 28.70 -7.06
3
0.70 13.30 0.00 52.94 51.40 -12.64
Pressure at rest on front face of the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  Kr Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 0.20 0.00 17.07 6.40 19.00 0.706
2 0.00 89.69(80.00) 17.07 6.40 19.00 0.706 MODIFIED
3 0.50 0.00 17.07 6.40 19.00 0.706
7
Cuculici Robert
Pressure at rest distribution on front face of the structure

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.20 3.80 0.00 2.68 2.68 0.00
0.20 3.80 0.00 3.77 0.47 3.74
2
0.20 3.83 0.00 3.80 0.47 3.77
0.20 3.83 0.00 2.70 2.70 0.00
3
0.70 13.30 0.00 9.40 9.40 0.00
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.12 0.00 25.67 0.00 18.00 14.08 0.356
2 0.88 29.50 25.67 0.00 18.00 25.67 0.691
3 0.12 0.00 25.67 0.00 18.00 14.08 0.356
4 0.88 29.50 25.67 0.00 18.00 25.67 0.691
5 0.56 0.00 25.67 0.00 18.00 14.08 0.356
6 0.44 29.50 25.67 0.00 18.00 25.67 0.691
7 0.50 0.00 17.07 6.40 19.00 13.82 0.484
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.12 2.09 0.00 0.74 0.72 0.18
0.12 2.09 0.00 1.45 0.83 1.19
2
1.00 18.00 0.00 12.44 7.10 10.21
1.00 18.00 0.00 6.40 6.21 1.56
3
1.12 20.09 0.00 7.15 6.93 1.74
1.12 20.09 0.00 13.88 7.93 11.40
4
2.00 36.00 0.00 24.87 14.20 20.42
2.00 36.00 0.00 12.80 12.42 3.11
5
2.56 46.05 0.00 16.38 15.89 3.98
2.56 46.05 0.00 31.81 18.17 26.12
6
3.00 54.00 0.00 37.31 21.31 30.63
3.00 54.00 0.00 18.07 17.54 4.32
7
3.50 63.50 0.00 22.67 22.01 5.41
No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 0.12 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.356 0.552 0.196
2 0.88 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.691 1.092 0.401
3 0.12 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.356 0.552 0.196
4 0.88 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.691 1.092 0.401
5 0.56 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.356 0.552 0.196
6 0.44 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.691 1.092 0.401
7 0.50 17.07 0.00 12.53 0.484 0.772 0.288
8
Cuculici Robert

0.00 0.00 57.15 11.20 10.87 2.73
1
0.12 1.88 55.27 10.83 10.51 2.64
0.12 1.88 55.27 22.17 12.66 18.20
2
1.00 16.20 40.95 16.43 9.38 13.49
1.00 16.20 40.95 8.03 7.79 1.95
3
1.12 18.08 39.07 7.66 7.43 1.86
1.12 18.08 39.07 15.67 8.95 12.87
4
2.00 32.40 24.75 9.93 5.67 8.15
2.00 32.40 24.75 4.85 4.71 1.18
5
2.56 41.44 15.71 3.08 2.99 0.75
2.56 41.44 15.71 6.30 3.60 5.17
6
3.00 48.60 8.55 3.43 1.96 2.82
3.00 48.60 8.55 2.46 2.39 0.59
7
3.50 57.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.12 0.00 0.00
4 0.46 0.00 0.00
5 0.46 1.93 2.78
6 1.00 1.87 2.68
7 1.00 3.44 0.86
8 1.12 3.41 0.86
9 1.12 1.85 2.66
10 2.00 1.75 2.51
11 2.00 3.22 0.81
12 2.56 3.09 0.77
13 2.56 1.67 2.41
14 3.00 1.62 2.33
15 3.00 3.97 0.98
16 3.50 3.77 0.93
Weight - wall 0.00 -1.36 111.00 1.11 1.000 1.000 1.000
Earthq.- constr. 22.20 -1.36 -11.10 1.11 1.000 1.000 1.000
FF resistance -14.04 -0.29 -3.03 0.05 1.000 1.000 1.000
Active pressure 40.60 -1.20 36.24 2.13 1.000 1.000 1.000
9
Cuculici Robert

suprasarcina 7.43 -1.35 5.82 2.02 1.300 1.300 1.300
Verification of complete wall
Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip

Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY
Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY
Maximum stress in footing bottom : 128.63 kPa

Name : Verification Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
3.98
34.67
0.89
4
111.00 3.98
3.50
3 0.89
48.14
7.58
24.82
0.99
2 0.22
18.71 1
+x
+z
Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Design load acting at the center of footing bottom
Moment Norm. force Shear Force Eccentricity Stress
No.
[kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [–] [kPa]
1 83.56 229.52 77.37 0.146 129.53
2 79.59 187.53 77.37 0.170 113.57
3 99.71 175.01 82.51 0.228 128.63
4 99.71 175.01 82.51 0.228 128.63
Service load acting at the center of footing bottom
10
Cuculici Robert
Moment Norm. force Shear Force

No.
[kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m]
1 75.37 172.45 63.32
Verification of foundation soil
Eccentricity verification
Max. eccentricity of normal force e = 0.146
Maximum allowable eccentricity ealw = 0.333
Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY
Verification of bearing capacity

Max. stress at footing bottom  = 129.53 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil Rd = 250.00 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil is SATISFACTORY
Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY

Name : Bearing cap. Stage - analysis : 1 - -1
3.50
3
1
129.53
129.53
Dimensioning No. 1
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 1.00 0.00 31.00 0.00 18.00 17.00 0.288
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
1.00 18.00 0.00 5.19 4.96 1.52
11
Cuculici Robert

No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 1.00 31.00 0.00 12.53 0.288 0.458 0.170
0.00 0.00 16.20 2.76 2.63 0.81
1
1.00 16.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.60 0.00 0.00
4 0.60 2.86 0.87
5 1.00 2.78 0.85
Weight - wall 0.00 -0.50 18.00 0.50 1.000 1.000 1.350
Earthq.- constr. 3.60 -0.50 -1.80 0.50 1.000 1.000 1.000
Active pressure 2.48 -0.33 0.76 1.00 1.350 1.350 1.000
suprasarcina 1.13 -0.20 0.34 1.00 1.500 1.500 1.500
Verification of the most stressed construction joint - above the block No. 3
Joint for overturning stability is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip

Joint for slip is SATISFACTORY

No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 1.00 0.00 25.67 0.00 18.00 14.08 0.356
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
1.00 18.00 0.00 6.40 6.21 1.56
12
Cuculici Robert

No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 1.00 25.67 0.00 12.53 0.356 0.552 0.196
0.00 0.00 16.20 3.18 3.08 0.77
1
1.00 16.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. [m] [kPa] [kPa]
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.46 0.00 0.00
4 0.46 3.58 0.90
5 1.00 3.45 0.87
Weight - wall 0.00 -0.50 18.00 0.50 1.000 1.000 1.000
Earthq.- constr. 3.60 -0.50 -1.80 0.50 1.000 1.000 1.000
Active pressure 3.11 -0.33 0.78 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.000
suprasarcina 1.89 -0.27 0.47 1.00 1.300 1.300 1.300
Verification of the most stressed construction joint - above the block No. 3
Joint for overturning stability is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip

Joint for slip is SATISFACTORY
Verification of gabion block for maximum stress:

Maximum pressure on the bottom block = 32.18 kPa
Red.Coeff. by offset of top block = 1.00
Average value of pressure on face = 14.36 kPa
Shear force transmitted by friction = 16.93 kN/m
Bearing capacity against transverse pressure:

Joint bear.capacity = 210.00 kN/m
Computed stress-state = 7.18 kN/m
Transverse pressure check is SATISFACTORY
Joint btw. blocks check:

Mesh material bear.capacity = 210.00 kN/m
13
Cuculici Robert
Computed stress-state = 7.18 kN/m

Joint between blocks is SATISFACTORY

Name : Dimensioning Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
18.00
1.38
4.02 2.59
1.18
4
+x
3.50
3
+z
Slope stability analysis

Input data
Project
Settings
Romania - EN 1997 - constructii (SR EN 1990:2004/NA:2006) (4)
Stability analysis
Earthquake analysis : Standard
Verification methodology : according to EN 1997
Design approach : 3 - reduction of actions (GEO, STR) and soil parameters
Partial factors on actions (A)
State STR State GEO
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable
Permanent actions : G = 1.35 [–] 1.00 [–] 1.00 [–] 1.00 [–]
Variable actions : Q = 1.50 [–] 0.00 [–] 1.30 [–] 0.00 [–]
Water load : w = 1.00 [–]

Partial factor on internal friction :  = 1.25 [–]
Partial factor on effective cohesion : c = 1.25 [–]
Partial factor on undrained shear strength : cu = 1.40 [–]
14
Cuculici Robert
Interface
Coordinates of interface points [m]
No. Interface location
x z x z x z
1 -10.00 -2.80 -1.25 -2.80 -1.00 -2.80
-1.00 -2.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.00 0.50 -1.00

0.50 -2.00 1.00 -2.00 1.00 -3.00
1.25 -3.00
3 -10.00 -3.50 -1.35 -3.50 -1.25 -3.50

-1.25 -3.00 -1.00 -3.00 -1.00 -2.80
4 -1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.00

10.50 -3.00
5 1.25 -3.50 1.35 -3.50
6 -1.35 -3.50 -1.35 -3.70 1.35 -3.70

1.35 -3.50 10.50 -3.50
Soil parameters - effective stress state

ef cef 
No. Name Pattern
[°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense 31.00 0.00 18.00
2 Silty sand (SM) 21.00 8.00 19.00
15
Cuculici Robert
Soil parameters - uplift

sat s n
No. Name Pattern
[kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense 18.00
2 Silty sand (SM) 20.00
Soil parameters
Well graded grave (GW), medium dense

Silty sand (SM)

Rigid bodies

No. Name Sample
[kN/m3]
1 Wall material 24.00
Assigning and surfaces

Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned
No. Surface position
x z x z soil
1 10.50 -3.00 10.50 0.00 Well graded grave (GW),
0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.00 medium dense
0.50 -1.00 0.50 -2.00
1.00 -2.00 1.00 -3.00
1.25 -3.00
2 1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.00

Wall material
1.00 -3.00 1.00 -2.00
0.50 -2.00 0.50 -1.00
0.00 -1.00 0.00 0.00
-1.00 0.00 -1.00 -1.00
-1.00 -2.00 -1.00 -2.80
-1.00 -3.00 -1.25 -3.00
-1.25 -3.50
16
Cuculici Robert
Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

No. Surface position
x z x z soil
3 -1.35 -3.50 -1.25 -3.50
Silty sand (SM)
-1.25 -3.00 -1.00 -3.00
-1.00 -2.80 -1.25 -2.80
-10.00 -2.80 -10.00 -3.50
4 10.50 -3.50 10.50 -3.00

Silty sand (SM)
1.25 -3.00 1.25 -3.50
1.35 -3.50
5 -1.35 -3.70 1.35 -3.70 Well graded grave (GW),

1.35 -3.50 1.25 -3.50 medium dense
-1.25 -3.50 -1.35 -3.50
6 1.35 -3.50 1.35 -3.70

Silty sand (SM)
-1.35 -3.70 -1.35 -3.50
-10.00 -3.50 -10.00 -8.70
10.50 -8.70 10.50 -3.50
Surcharge
Location Origin Length Width Slope Magnitude
No. Type Type of action
z [m] x [m] l [m] b [m]  [°] q, q1, f, F q2 unit
1 strip variable on terrain x = 1.00 l = 3.00 0.00 10.00 kN/m2
Surcharges
No. Name
1 suprasarcina
Water
Water type : No water
Tensile crack
Tensile crack not inputted.
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient : Kh = 0.20
Vertical seismic coefficient : Kv = 0.10
Settings of the stage of construction
Design situation : permanent
Results (Stage of construction 1)
Analysis 1
Circular slip surface
17
Cuculici Robert
Slip surface parameters

x= -1.67 [m] 1 = -40.47 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 1.78 [m] 2 = 72.80 [°]
Radius : R= 6.02 [m]
The slip surface after optimization.
Slope stability verification (Morgenstern-Price)
Utilization : 94.0 %
Slope stability ACCEPTABLE
Optimization of circular slip surface (Morgenstern-Price)
Center Radius
No. Utilization Verification
x [m] z [m] R [m]
1 -2.56 4.33 9.76 80.7 % ACCEPTABLE
2 -0.97 7.00 13.19 72.9 % ACCEPTABLE
3 -1.12 8.02 13.88 74.9 % ACCEPTABLE
4 1.46 4.33 9.76 66.7 % ACCEPTABLE
5 -0.11 0.87 10.36 48.9 % ACCEPTABLE
6 -4.25 0.45 6.43 3.1 % ACCEPTABLE
7 -1.36 9.75 15.13 77.1 % ACCEPTABLE
8 1.68 3.13 9.08 61.1 % ACCEPTABLE
9 -2.56 4.33 9.76 80.7 % ACCEPTABLE
10 0.65 1.40 8.33 56.9 % ACCEPTABLE
11 -1.77 7.29 12.90 77.6 % ACCEPTABLE
12 -1.72 6.97 12.68 77.0 % ACCEPTABLE
13 0.12 4.33 9.76 72.2 % ACCEPTABLE
14 -0.97 1.96 10.03 58.8 % ACCEPTABLE
15 -3.82 1.82 7.55 75.5 % ACCEPTABLE
16 -1.92 0.04 5.43 74.2 % ACCEPTABLE
17 -1.88 8.06 13.43 78.8 % ACCEPTABLE
18 0.16 4.10 9.62 71.3 % ACCEPTABLE
19 -2.56 4.33 9.76 80.7 % ACCEPTABLE
20 -0.63 3.53 9.30 72.9 % ACCEPTABLE
21 -2.08 11.53 15.29 2.8 % ACCEPTABLE
22 -2.21 6.86 12.28 79.5 % ACCEPTABLE
23 -0.15 0.90 8.17 56.1 % ACCEPTABLE
24 -2.12 6.26 11.88 78.3 % ACCEPTABLE
25 -0.77 4.33 9.76 76.2 % ACCEPTABLE
26 -1.57 2.78 9.94 66.0 % ACCEPTABLE
27 -2.12 1.14 6.62 78.0 % ACCEPTABLE
28 -3.63 3.30 8.68 81.3 % ACCEPTABLE
29 -1.66 2.35 8.18 74.9 % ACCEPTABLE
30 -2.90 4.84 10.29 80.9 % ACCEPTABLE
31 -1.22 0.14 7.41 57.8 % ACCEPTABLE
32 -2.87 4.67 10.19 80.4 % ACCEPTABLE
33 -1.84 3.30 8.68 79.9 % ACCEPTABLE
34 -2.32 1.51 8.63 65.0 % ACCEPTABLE
35 -4.04 0.57 6.67 66.0 % ACCEPTABLE
36 -2.96 5.17 10.50 81.7 % ACCEPTABLE
37 -1.05 4.47 10.06 76.1 % ACCEPTABLE
38 -2.26 7.13 12.46 80.1 % ACCEPTABLE
39 -0.52 1.47 8.62 60.9 % ACCEPTABLE
40 -2.20 6.72 12.19 79.3 % ACCEPTABLE
41 -1.17 5.17 10.50 78.3 % ACCEPTABLE
42 -1.60 2.96 10.02 66.9 % ACCEPTABLE
43 -2.53 1.81 7.16 80.9 % ACCEPTABLE
18
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
44 -3.68 3.55 8.82 82.4 % ACCEPTABLE
45 -1.71 2.62 8.31 76.5 % ACCEPTABLE
46 -2.96 5.18 10.51 81.7 % ACCEPTABLE
47 -1.25 0.29 7.44 59.1 % ACCEPTABLE
48 -2.92 4.95 10.36 81.2 % ACCEPTABLE
49 -1.89 3.55 8.82 81.1 % ACCEPTABLE
50 -2.35 1.69 8.70 66.2 % ACCEPTABLE
51 -3.09 0.05 5.69 69.7 % ACCEPTABLE
52 -3.02 5.49 10.71 82.4 % ACCEPTABLE
53 -1.12 4.83 10.28 77.3 % ACCEPTABLE
54 -2.33 7.55 12.76 80.7 % ACCEPTABLE
55 -0.56 1.65 8.68 62.1 % ACCEPTABLE
56 -2.25 7.07 12.43 79.9 % ACCEPTABLE
57 -1.23 5.49 10.71 79.1 % ACCEPTABLE
58 -1.64 3.17 10.11 67.9 % ACCEPTABLE
59 -2.59 2.06 7.28 82.7 % ACCEPTABLE
60 -0.53 0.85 6.76 66.6 % ACCEPTABLE
61 -3.03 5.57 10.76 82.6 % ACCEPTABLE
62 -2.84 4.50 10.08 79.9 % ACCEPTABLE
63 -0.80 2.06 7.28 76.6 % ACCEPTABLE
64 -2.36 1.73 8.71 66.4 % ACCEPTABLE
65 -3.92 0.06 6.53 61.4 % ACCEPTABLE
66 -3.00 5.42 10.66 82.3 % ACCEPTABLE
67 -0.79 2.00 7.25 76.1 % ACCEPTABLE
68 -2.59 2.06 7.28 82.7 % ACCEPTABLE
69 -1.33 1.76 7.13 77.3 % ACCEPTABLE
70 -2.09 5.12 9.22 22.3 % ACCEPTABLE
71 -2.90 4.36 9.54 83.1 % ACCEPTABLE
72 -1.69 4.29 9.49 80.9 % ACCEPTABLE
73 -3.70 11.56 15.60 1.9 % ACCEPTABLE
74 -2.50 8.55 12.62 85.8 % ACCEPTABLE
75 -1.46 9.34 13.28 83.7 % ACCEPTABLE
76 -2.99 13.15 17.12 5.3 % ACCEPTABLE
77 -0.55 4.53 9.65 77.4 % ACCEPTABLE
78 -2.65 11.08 15.35 82.9 % ACCEPTABLE
79 -1.31 8.55 12.62 84.4 % ACCEPTABLE
80 -1.97 6.92 12.12 80.4 % ACCEPTABLE
81 -2.25 5.83 9.77 1.1 % ACCEPTABLE
82 -2.13 3.03 8.29 81.6 % ACCEPTABLE
83 -1.43 2.18 7.35 80.2 % ACCEPTABLE
84 -3.23 6.09 10.72 86.3 % ACCEPTABLE
85 -2.08 6.29 10.87 85.4 % ACCEPTABLE
86 -3.23 8.77 13.31 84.1 % ACCEPTABLE
87 -1.47 3.07 8.80 75.6 % ACCEPTABLE
88 -3.05 7.74 12.52 83.7 % ACCEPTABLE
89 -2.04 6.09 10.72 85.2 % ACCEPTABLE
90 -2.53 4.67 10.42 78.1 % ACCEPTABLE
91 -3.09 1.89 7.72 76.3 % ACCEPTABLE
92 -2.38 1.13 6.88 75.4 % ACCEPTABLE
93 -3.76 3.99 9.09 83.6 % ACCEPTABLE
94 -2.78 2.91 7.75 87.2 % ACCEPTABLE
95 -1.55 2.73 7.64 83.5 % ACCEPTABLE
96 -3.13 5.56 10.34 85.8 % ACCEPTABLE
97 -1.10 0.72 6.73 68.2 % ACCEPTABLE
19
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
98 -2.96 4.69 9.76 83.9 % ACCEPTABLE
99 -1.59 2.91 7.75 84.4 % ACCEPTABLE
100 -2.55 2.52 8.53 75.2 % ACCEPTABLE
101 -3.67 1.59 7.07 76.9 % ACCEPTABLE
102 -2.35 0.53 5.58 80.3 % ACCEPTABLE
103 -3.42 0.48 6.65 67.8 % ACCEPTABLE
104 -3.08 5.31 10.17 85.3 % ACCEPTABLE
105 -1.62 3.05 7.84 85.0 % ACCEPTABLE
106 -2.78 2.91 7.75 87.2 % ACCEPTABLE
107 -2.01 3.00 7.80 86.4 % ACCEPTABLE
108 -3.02 4.65 9.44 86.4 % ACCEPTABLE
109 -1.65 1.42 6.99 76.2 % ACCEPTABLE
110 -2.91 4.11 9.09 85.0 % ACCEPTABLE
111 -1.99 2.91 7.75 85.9 % ACCEPTABLE
112 -2.61 2.63 8.24 79.0 % ACCEPTABLE
113 -2.72 0.73 6.37 75.1 % ACCEPTABLE
114 -2.24 0.26 5.85 73.6 % ACCEPTABLE
115 -3.40 2.16 7.34 82.1 % ACCEPTABLE
116 -2.50 1.29 6.25 84.3 % ACCEPTABLE
117 -3.19 1.18 6.90 75.2 % ACCEPTABLE
118 -2.57 1.54 6.37 86.3 % ACCEPTABLE
119 -2.98 4.46 9.32 85.9 % ACCEPTABLE
120 -2.02 3.05 7.83 86.6 % ACCEPTABLE
121 -2.78 2.91 7.75 87.2 % ACCEPTABLE
122 -2.28 3.06 7.84 87.1 % ACCEPTABLE
123 -2.94 4.06 8.86 86.9 % ACCEPTABLE
124 -2.02 1.90 7.21 80.5 % ACCEPTABLE
125 -2.87 3.72 8.64 85.9 % ACCEPTABLE
126 -2.25 2.91 7.75 86.4 % ACCEPTABLE
127 -2.66 2.71 8.06 81.5 % ACCEPTABLE
128 -2.66 2.07 6.86 87.8 % ACCEPTABLE
129 -2.16 2.18 6.92 87.9 % ACCEPTABLE
130 -1.66 2.30 6.99 86.7 % ACCEPTABLE
131 -1.94 3.45 7.70 91.9 % ACCEPTABLE
132 -1.48 3.73 7.89 90.6 % ACCEPTABLE
133 -1.84 5.19 8.97 1.2 % ACCEPTABLE
134 -2.14 4.81 9.01 90.5 % ACCEPTABLE
135 -1.12 2.29 6.98 83.9 % ACCEPTABLE
136 -2.03 4.30 8.65 89.7 % ACCEPTABLE
137 -1.41 3.45 7.70 89.8 % ACCEPTABLE
138 -1.77 3.14 7.89 85.9 % ACCEPTABLE
139 -1.80 1.66 6.43 86.5 % ACCEPTABLE
140 -1.48 1.31 6.04 85.4 % ACCEPTABLE
141 -2.32 2.85 7.31 91.3 % ACCEPTABLE
142 -1.72 2.17 6.50 92.2 % ACCEPTABLE
143 -1.24 2.35 6.61 90.1 % ACCEPTABLE
144 -1.57 3.57 7.42 2.6 % ACCEPTABLE
145 -1.92 3.34 7.63 91.5 % ACCEPTABLE
146 -0.93 1.19 5.98 81.0 % ACCEPTABLE
147 -1.82 2.93 7.36 90.2 % ACCEPTABLE
148 -1.19 2.17 6.50 89.0 % ACCEPTABLE
149 -1.58 1.97 6.81 84.5 % ACCEPTABLE
150 -1.59 1.37 5.64 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
151 -1.10 1.50 5.71 90.8 % ACCEPTABLE
20
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
152 -1.79 2.44 6.67 24.1 % ACCEPTABLE
153 -0.80 0.49 5.23 79.2 % ACCEPTABLE
154 -1.69 2.07 6.44 91.6 % ACCEPTABLE
155 -1.06 1.37 5.64 89.5 % ACCEPTABLE
156 -1.46 1.22 6.00 84.5 % ACCEPTABLE
157 -1.48 0.04 4.83 80.2 % ACCEPTABLE
158 -1.36 0.38 4.73 87.9 % ACCEPTABLE
159 -1.80 0.32 5.16 81.8 % ACCEPTABLE
160 -1.75 2.29 6.58 92.7 % ACCEPTABLE
161 -1.10 1.48 5.70 90.5 % ACCEPTABLE
162 -1.59 1.37 5.64 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
163 -1.28 1.50 5.71 92.1 % ACCEPTABLE
164 -1.73 2.08 6.31 24.5 % ACCEPTABLE
165 -1.06 0.78 5.35 84.4 % ACCEPTABLE
166 -1.66 1.84 6.18 92.1 % ACCEPTABLE
167 -1.24 1.37 5.64 90.9 % ACCEPTABLE
168 -1.50 1.26 5.87 87.3 % ACCEPTABLE
169 -1.51 0.44 5.05 84.9 % ACCEPTABLE
170 -1.29 0.23 4.82 83.2 % ACCEPTABLE
171 -1.44 0.70 5.02 90.0 % ACCEPTABLE
172 -1.72 0.64 5.29 85.8 % ACCEPTABLE
173 -1.70 1.97 6.25 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
174 -1.26 1.46 5.69 91.7 % ACCEPTABLE
175 -1.59 1.37 5.64 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
176 -1.39 1.48 5.70 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
177 -1.24 0.98 5.44 88.0 % ACCEPTABLE
178 -1.64 1.68 6.00 92.6 % ACCEPTABLE
179 -1.35 1.37 5.64 91.8 % ACCEPTABLE
180 -1.53 1.30 5.79 89.3 % ACCEPTABLE
181 -1.53 0.72 5.23 87.6 % ACCEPTABLE
182 -1.38 0.58 5.06 86.9 % ACCEPTABLE
183 -1.49 0.92 5.22 91.3 % ACCEPTABLE
184 -1.67 0.87 5.39 88.5 % ACCEPTABLE
185 -1.66 1.77 6.04 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
186 -1.46 1.89 6.11 92.9 % ACCEPTABLE
187 -1.75 2.26 6.51 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
188 -1.30 1.35 5.81 88.5 % ACCEPTABLE
189 -1.71 2.10 6.41 92.5 % ACCEPTABLE
190 -1.42 1.77 6.04 92.0 % ACCEPTABLE
191 -1.59 1.68 6.18 89.4 % ACCEPTABLE
192 -1.60 1.08 5.58 89.1 % ACCEPTABLE
193 -1.45 0.93 5.41 88.5 % ACCEPTABLE
194 -1.56 1.29 5.59 92.5 % ACCEPTABLE
195 -1.74 1.23 5.75 89.7 % ACCEPTABLE
196 -1.59 1.37 5.63 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
197 -1.73 2.19 6.46 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
198 -1.44 1.84 6.08 92.6 % ACCEPTABLE
199 -1.66 1.77 6.04 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
200 -1.53 1.86 6.09 93.2 % ACCEPTABLE
201 -1.72 2.10 6.35 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
202 -1.59 2.20 6.41 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
203 -1.78 2.44 6.68 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
204 -1.48 1.80 6.18 90.6 % ACCEPTABLE
205 -1.75 2.33 6.60 92.9 % ACCEPTABLE
21
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
206 -1.56 2.10 6.35 92.7 % ACCEPTABLE
207 -1.67 2.03 6.43 91.0 % ACCEPTABLE
208 -1.67 1.60 6.01 91.3 % ACCEPTABLE
209 -1.58 1.50 5.89 91.2 % ACCEPTABLE
210 -1.65 1.76 6.03 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
211 -1.77 1.71 6.13 91.6 % ACCEPTABLE
212 -1.67 1.82 6.07 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
213 -1.54 1.91 6.12 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
214 -1.73 2.15 6.38 24.4 % ACCEPTABLE
215 -1.43 1.54 5.91 90.7 % ACCEPTABLE
216 -1.70 2.04 6.32 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
217 -1.51 1.82 6.07 92.8 % ACCEPTABLE
218 -1.62 1.76 6.16 91.1 % ACCEPTABLE
219 -1.62 1.34 5.75 91.1 % ACCEPTABLE
220 -1.53 1.24 5.63 90.9 % ACCEPTABLE
221 -1.60 1.50 5.77 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
222 -1.72 1.45 5.86 91.6 % ACCEPTABLE
223 -1.72 2.10 6.35 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
224 -1.53 1.87 6.10 93.2 % ACCEPTABLE
225 -1.67 1.82 6.07 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
226 -1.58 1.88 6.11 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
227 -1.71 2.04 6.28 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
228 -1.51 1.63 5.96 91.7 % ACCEPTABLE
229 -1.69 1.97 6.24 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
230 -1.57 1.82 6.07 93.2 % ACCEPTABLE
231 -1.64 1.78 6.13 91.9 % ACCEPTABLE
232 -1.64 1.50 5.85 92.2 % ACCEPTABLE
233 -1.57 1.43 5.77 92.0 % ACCEPTABLE
234 -1.63 1.60 5.87 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
235 -1.70 1.57 5.93 92.3 % ACCEPTABLE
236 -1.70 2.00 6.26 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
237 -1.58 1.85 6.09 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
238 -1.67 1.82 6.07 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
239 -1.61 1.86 6.10 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
240 -1.64 1.97 6.16 13.7 % ACCEPTABLE
241 -1.56 1.69 6.00 92.2 % ACCEPTABLE
242 -1.68 1.92 6.18 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
243 -1.60 1.82 6.07 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
244 -1.65 1.79 6.11 92.5 % ACCEPTABLE
245 -1.65 1.60 5.92 92.7 % ACCEPTABLE
246 -1.61 1.55 5.87 92.6 % ACCEPTABLE
247 -1.69 1.65 5.97 92.9 % ACCEPTABLE
248 -1.69 1.94 6.19 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
249 -1.61 1.84 6.08 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
250 -1.67 1.82 6.07 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
251 -1.63 1.85 6.09 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
252 -1.71 2.00 6.21 14.4 % ACCEPTABLE
253 -1.65 1.92 6.13 26.4 % ACCEPTABLE
254 -1.60 1.74 6.02 93.0 % ACCEPTABLE
255 -1.68 1.89 6.14 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
256 -1.62 1.82 6.07 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
257 -1.66 1.80 6.10 92.9 % ACCEPTABLE
258 -1.66 1.75 6.00 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
259 -1.62 1.78 6.02 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
22
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
260 -1.64 1.85 6.06 24.7 % ACCEPTABLE
261 -1.59 1.67 5.95 93.0 % ACCEPTABLE
262 -1.67 1.82 6.07 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
263 -1.61 1.75 6.00 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
264 -1.65 1.73 6.03 92.9 % ACCEPTABLE
265 -1.65 1.61 5.90 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
266 -1.62 1.57 5.86 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
267 -1.64 1.65 5.91 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
268 -1.67 1.64 5.94 93.2 % ACCEPTABLE
269 -1.67 1.83 6.08 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
270 -1.62 1.76 6.01 93.6 % ACCEPTABLE
271 -1.66 1.75 6.00 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
272 -1.63 1.77 6.01 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
273 -1.67 1.81 6.06 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
274 -1.61 1.69 5.97 93.1 % ACCEPTABLE
275 -1.67 1.79 6.05 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
276 -1.63 1.75 6.00 93.6 % ACCEPTABLE
277 -1.65 1.74 6.02 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
278 -1.65 1.65 5.93 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
279 -1.63 1.63 5.91 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
280 -1.68 1.73 5.99 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
281 -1.67 1.67 5.96 93.3 % ACCEPTABLE
282 -1.67 1.80 6.05 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
283 -1.63 1.76 6.01 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
284 -1.66 1.75 6.00 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
285 -1.64 1.76 6.01 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
286 -1.65 1.79 6.03 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
287 -1.63 1.80 6.04 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
288 -1.62 1.75 6.01 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
289 -1.63 1.79 6.03 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
290 -1.64 1.78 6.04 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
291 -1.65 1.76 6.00 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
292 -1.63 1.77 6.01 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
293 -1.66 1.80 6.04 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
294 -1.62 1.72 5.98 93.4 % ACCEPTABLE
295 -1.65 1.79 6.03 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
296 -1.63 1.76 6.00 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
297 -1.64 1.75 6.01 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
298 -1.65 1.73 5.97 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
299 -1.63 1.74 5.98 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
300 -1.66 1.77 6.01 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
301 -1.62 1.69 5.95 93.5 % ACCEPTABLE
302 -1.65 1.76 6.00 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
303 -1.63 1.73 5.97 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
304 -1.64 1.72 5.98 93.6 % ACCEPTABLE
305 -1.64 1.67 5.93 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
306 -1.63 1.65 5.91 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
307 -1.66 1.68 5.94 93.8 % ACCEPTABLE
308 -1.66 1.77 6.01 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
309 -1.65 1.73 5.97 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
310 -1.64 1.74 5.98 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
311 -1.66 1.76 6.00 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
312 -1.65 1.77 6.01 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
313 -1.64 1.74 5.99 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
23
Cuculici Robert
Center Radius
x [m] z [m] R [m]
314 -1.66 1.78 6.02 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
315 -1.65 1.79 6.03 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
316 -1.64 1.76 6.01 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
317 -1.66 1.80 6.04 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
318 -1.65 1.78 6.02 93.9 % ACCEPTABLE
319 -1.66 1.77 6.03 93.6 % ACCEPTABLE
320 -1.66 1.76 6.00 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
321 -1.67 1.78 6.02 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
322 -1.66 1.79 6.03 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
323 -1.65 1.76 6.01 93.7 % ACCEPTABLE
324 -1.66 1.78 6.02 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
325 -1.66 1.78 6.02 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE
326 -1.67 1.78 6.02 94.0 % ACCEPTABLE

Name : Analysis Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
24

Gabion Analysis Input Data: Project

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Gabion Analysis Input Data: Project

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Dimensionare zid gabioane sprijinire rambleu platforma H=3m

Partial factors for soil parameters (M)

Partial factors for soil parameters (M)

Partial factors for variable actions

Name : Geometry Stage - analysis : 1 - 0

1 3.00 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense

2 - Silty sand (SM)

Pressure at rest on front face of the structure - partial results

Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment

Name Fhor App.Pt. Fvert App.Pt. Coeff. Coeff. Coeff.

Check for slip

Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY

Maximum stress in footing bottom : 129.53 kPa

Pressure at rest distribution on front face of the structure

Earthquake effects (active earth pressure)

Name Fhor App.Pt. Fvert App.Pt. Coeff. Coeff. Coeff.

Check for slip

Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY

Maximum stress in footing bottom : 128.63 kPa

Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Moment Norm. force Shear Force

Verification of bearing capacity

Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY

Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results

Check for slip

Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results

Check for slip

Verification of gabion block for maximum stress:

Bearing capacity against transverse pressure:

Joint btw. blocks check:

Computed stress-state = 7.18 kN/m

Slope stability analysis

Partial factors for soil parameters (M)

2 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.00 0.50 -1.00

3 -10.00 -3.50 -1.35 -3.50 -1.25 -3.50

4 -1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.00

5 1.25 -3.50 1.35 -3.50

6 -1.35 -3.50 -1.35 -3.70 1.35 -3.70

Soil parameters - effective stress state

1 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense 31.00 0.00 18.00

2 Silty sand (SM) 21.00 8.00 19.00

Soil parameters - uplift

1 Well graded grave (GW), medium dense 18.00

2 Silty sand (SM) 20.00

1 Wall material 24.00

Assigning and surfaces

2 1.25 -3.50 1.25 -3.00

Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

4 10.50 -3.50 10.50 -3.00

5 -1.35 -3.70 1.35 -3.70 Well graded grave (GW),

6 1.35 -3.50 1.35 -3.70

Slip surface parameters

Вам также может понравиться