For: Violation of Sec. 11, Art. II of MARVIN VILLARAN y DELA R.A. 9165 CRUZ, Accused. x----------------------x
-versus- Criminal Case Nos. 703-V-19 to
704-V-19 JAVE ROMA y CAMPOSANO, For: Violation of Sec. 11 and 12, Accused. Art. II of R.A. 9165 x----------------------x
MOTION TO SET HEARING
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
The above-named accused, represented by the Public Attorney’s
Office, unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully avers as follows:
1. On 29 May 2020, Chief Justice Diosdado M. Peralta issued
Administrative Circular No. 41-2020 (Re: Court Operations Beginning 1 June 2020) which states, among others, that the hearings of cases, regardless of the stage of the trial, shall all be in-court, except in cases involving Persons Deprived of Liberty (PDLs) who shall continue to appear remotely from the detention facility, and in cases with extraordinary circumstances as may be determined by the justices and judges, which shall be heard through videoconferencing.
2. Subsequently, the Supreme Court Public Information Office released
an Announcement dated 31 May 2020 in which it said that courts in areas under general community quarantine may hold hearings in criminal and civil cases through videoconferencing provided that a proper motion is filed: “Videoconferencing hearings will continue during GCQ. This is authorized by both AC 40-2020 and AC 41-2020 which were issued by Chief Justice Diosdado M. Peralta. Hence, for example, if a party wishes his/her case to be heard via videoconferencing, the proper motion just needs to be filed, and the court, using its sound discretion, can either grant or deny the motion. This remedy is available in both civil and criminal cases.”
3. In the instant cases, while the accused is a person deprived of
liberty the remaining witnesses which the defense will present in accordance with the pre-trial order are not detainees. They are Ligaya Seria Dawat, Lilibeth Dawat, Beth Marcos and Charito Bernardo. In this regard, in order to safeguard all the parties and their counsel as well as the judge and the court staff against the risk of possible COVID-19 infection, the defense humbly implores the Honorable Court to set the hearing of the above-captioned case through videoconferencing in lieu of an in-court hearing. The undersigned counsel undertakes to coordinate with the aforementioned witnesses who may appear and testify at his office using his device and MS Teams account.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed that
this motion be granted.
Other relief and remedies, just and equitable, are likewise prayed for.
Valenzuela City, 8 June 2020.
PUBLIC ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
VALENZUELA DISTRICT OFFICE 1 Floor, Metropolitan Trial Court Bldg. st
Justice Hall Compound, C.J. Santos St., Poblacion II,
Malinta, Valenzuela City
Through:
ATTY. RAFAEL D. PANGILINAN
Public Attorney II Roll No. 64684 IBP OR No. 035862 dated 8/1/18 / CALMANA MCLE Compliance No. VI - 0006876 dated 3/20/18
Copy furnished: ACP Aileen S. Agacita Office of the City Prosecutor Valenzuela City