Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOCUMENT/REPORT EXAMPLES
PROJECTIONS:
Final Report R
Interim Report r
2000 2001
Test Study Test Study Study Nature of Study and Current
Article Identity System Initiation Director Status/Final Report M A M J J A S O N D J F
AC-123 99-322 Mouse 01/07/00 Smith Acute PO Tox/In-Preparation R
AC-123 00-107 Rat 03/09/00 Robbins One-Month IV Tox/In-Process I I R
BD-149 99-257 Dog 09/19/99 Robbins Three-Month IV Tox/
Issued 3/26/00 R
BD-149 99-314 Monkey 12/17/99 Williams Six-Month IV Tox/In-Process I I R
RS-160 00-059 Rat 03/25/00 Smith Acute IV Tox/Protocol P I R
RS-160 00-103 Rat 04/09/00 Smith One-Month IV/Protocol P I R
TM-172 99-337 Salmonella 03/05/00 Gentry Ames Test/In-Preparation I R
VW-178 99-157 Dog 08/20/99 Robbins Twelve-Month Diet/In-Process I I R
ST-205 98-145 Mouse 08/06/98 Williams 2-Year Carcinogenicity Diet
In-Process r I I I I
ST-205 98-147 Rat 09/20/98 Harris 2-Year Carcinogenicity Diet
In-Process I r I I I
WS-310 99-258 Dog 10/02/99 Anderson Three-Month PO Tox/In-Preparation R
NORTHERN RESEARCH, INC. Version 1
QUALITY ASSURANCE
INSPECTION REPORT
W. Harris, PhD
To: ______________________________ K. Bellows, DVM
and ________________________
STUDY DIRECTOR
______________________________ MONITOR
________________________
Please respond to the observation below, and return this report to the
Quality Assurance Unit by 9/6/99.
Report Number: 99-092
__________________________
Study Number: 98-147
__________________________ Page: 1 of 1
__________________________
Test Article: ST-205
__________________________ Date: 8/6/99
__________________________
This is a CONFIDENTIAL legal document that is to be maintained by Quality Assurance for the pe-
riod of time as prescribed by the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Initiation:
In-Process: ✓ 5/24; 6/12, 20; 7/8; 8/2/99
Completion:
Reporting:
B. W. Herrick B. W. Herrick 8/6/99
OBSERVATION: The scale used in measuring body weights had an expired calibration date. Weigh-
ings were done 8/2/99; the labeled calibration expiration date of this scale, Asset
#434, was 7/25/99.
RESPONSE: All the scales and balances within this facility are in a scheduled calibration
program. The Calibration Record for the above scale indicates that it was calibrated
on 7/24/99; however, the calibrator had failed to replace the calibration tag with
one having the correct information. Metrology had been contacted and will make
the correction.
QAU REVIEW:
Action Plan Acceptance Date: August 13, 1999
By: B. W. Herrick
Completed: 8/19/99
Periodic Inspections of Study Number 99-257 entitled Three-Month IV Toxicity Study of BD-149 in
Dogs were conducted on all phases by the Quality Assurance Unit of Northern Research, Inc.
Results of inspections were reported to Management and the Study Director on 10/25, 12/20/99, and
3/6/00.
To the best of the signator’s knowledge there were no significant deviations from the Good Laboratory
Practice Regulations that affected the quality of integrity of the study.
James A. Kensington
______________________________ 3/6/00
__________________________
James A. Kensington Date
Manager, Quality Assurance
INSPECTION REPORT
J. C. Smith, PhD
To: ______________________________ W. C. Jones, DVM, PhD
and ________________________
STUDY DIRECTOR
______________________________ MONITOR
________________________
Please respond to the observation below, and return this report to the
Quality Assurance Unit by 4/27/00.
Report Number: 00-019
__________________________
Study Number: 00-059
__________________________ Page: 1 of 1
__________________________
Test Article: RS-160
__________________________ Date: 3/26/00
__________________________
This is a CONFIDENTIAL legal document that is to be maintained by Quality Assurance for the pe-
riod of time as prescribed by the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Initiation: ✓ 3/25/00
In-Process:
Completion:
Reporting:
A. V. Moulchin A. V. Moulchin 3/26/00
OBSERVATION: The study protocol did not include the following information as required by the
GLP (58.120):
The procedure for identification of the test system
The statement of the proposed statistical methods to be used
RESPONSE: Protocol Change #2 has been approved and issued. It includes both the procedure
for identification of the rats and the proposed statistical methods to be used.
QAU REVIEW:
Action Plan Acceptance Date: March 30, 2000
By: A. V. Moulchin
Completed: 3/30/00
INSPECTION REPORT
D. Williams, PhD
To: ______________________________ K. Bellows, DVM
and ________________________
STUDY DIRECTOR
______________________________ MONITOR
________________________
Please respond to the observation below, and return this report to the
Quality Assurance Unit by 4/16/00.
Report Number: 00-006
__________________________
Study Number: 99-314
__________________________ Page: 1 of 1
__________________________
Test Article: BD-149
__________________________ Date: 3/6/00
__________________________
This is a CONFIDENTIAL legal document that is to be maintained by Quality Assurance for the pe-
riod of time as prescribed by the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
QAU REVIEW:
Action Plan Acceptance Date: 3/20/00
By: P. Verke
Completed: 4/16/00
INSPECTION REPORT
G. Robbins, PhD
To: ______________________________ L. Kannal, PhD
and ________________________
STUDY DIRECTOR
______________________________ MONITOR
________________________
Please respond to the observation below, and return this report to the
Quality Assurance Unit by 1/21/00.
Report Number: 99-112
__________________________
Study Number: 99-257
__________________________ Page: 1 of 1
__________________________
Test Article: BD-149
__________________________ Date: 12/20/99
__________________________
This is a CONFIDENTIAL legal document that is to be maintained by Quality Assurance for the pe-
riod of time as prescribed by the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Initiation: 12/17–20/99
In-Process:
Completion: ✓
Reporting:
A. D. Moulchin A. D. Moulchin 12/23/99
OBSERVATION: During necropsy, spinal fluid was collected from each animal. No departmental
SOP existed describing this procedure.
RESPONSE: The method describing this procedure has been written and will be documented in
a new SOP.
QAU REVIEW:
Action Plan Acceptance Date: 1/8/00
By: A. D. Moulchin
Completed: 1/21/00
INSPECTION REPORT
G. Robbins, PhD
To: ______________________________ L. McCarley, MS
and ________________________
STUDY DIRECTOR
______________________________ MONITOR
________________________
Please respond to the observation below, and return this report to the
Quality Assurance Unit by 4/6/00.
Report Number: 00-027
__________________________
Study Number: 99-257
__________________________ Page: 1 of 1
__________________________
Test Article: BD-149
__________________________ Date: 3/6/00
__________________________
This is a CONFIDENTIAL legal document that is to be maintained by Quality Assurance for the pe-
riod of time as prescribed by the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
QAU REVIEW:
Action Plan Acceptance Date: 3/20/00
By: A. D. Moulchin
Completed: 3/23/00
AUDIT REPORT
OBSERVATION: 1—The Test Method validation file for determining the potency of test article
ST-211 had been approved by the department manager on 10/16/99. Animals in
study 99-125 were dosed with this compound seven days prior to approval of the
validated test method on 10/9/99.
Examination of the applicable HPLC charts, run 11/06/99, indicate that only the
column has been identified.
RESPONSE: 1—The Test Method for the determination of potency for ST-211 includes more
than three determinations consistently using the same methodology and performed
by the same scientist. This had been reviewed in Dr. Shaw’s Laboratory Notebook,
accepted and acknowledged by management on 10/3/99. The formal Test Method-
ology Report was signed, as indicated, on 10/16/99. An explanation will be written,
filed both in the validation file and with the documentation for study 99-125.
QAU REVIEW:
Report Return Date: 12/5/99
Accepted By: J. A. Kensington Plan Accepted Date: 12/6/99
Title: Manager QA
Auditor: M. Simpson Plan Completed Date: 12/18/99
AUDIT REPORT
Contract Laboratory
QAU REVIEW:
Report Return Date: 6/23/00
Accepted By: J. A. Kensington Plan Accepted Date: 6/24/00
Title: Manager QA
Auditor: B. E. Anderson Plan Completed Date: 7/6/00