Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Contract arrangement
i. under the general law of contract, when a party makes an offer to provide goods / services for
some certain consideration and the other party accepts it; a contract exists which is enforceable at
law provided it is not any illegal act.
ii. in any construction contract whereby, an offer is made by a contractor who tender to carry out the
construction works for a certain sum and upon acceptance by the client; a building contract comes
into being.
iii. in order to ensure a contract is binding and effective it has to be in a written form (verbal also
accepted based on employer and contractor but will a lot of dispute). Each party to a contract has
agreed to do something and is liable for breach of contract if he fails to perform his part of the
agreement i.e. it establishes the contractual rights, obligations, responsibilities and liabilities of the
contracting parties.
iv. many standard forms of building contract (PAM/ PWD / CIDB / IEM) (AIAC & FIDIC) have been used
in the construction industry fully acknowledge by the client and the contractor.
v. the contractual arrangement forms the contractual and legal framework for the building
procurement process. This is normally done by a CQS.
2. Tendering methods
There are three principal methods of choosing a contractor through tendering as follows:
a) open tendering.
b) selective tendering.
c) negotiated tenders.
2.1. Open tendering
a) initiated by the client’s consultants usually CQS upon instruction by the client.
b) place advertisement in local newspapers / technical press stating the description of the project,
location, form of contract, class of contractors (class A – class F) etc. to invite contractors to
apply for tender documents.
c) suitable contractors pay the tender documentation charges to collect the tender documents.
d) tender deposits (cannot withdraw the tender) are required and refundable to unsuccessful
contractor on the submission of a bona fide tender.
Advantages:
a) an opportunity to provide capable contractors to submit their tenders.
b) fulfills public accountability (CAT – competitive, accountability and transparency) and removes
any suspicion of favoritism.
c) highly competitive tender expected due to large number of contractors participation.
Disadvantages:
a) there is a danger that the lowest tender may be submitted by a contractor who is inexperience
in preparing tender (especially where BQ is not provided).
b) there is no guarantee that the lowest tenderer is capable or financially sound to undertake the
project to completion.
c) tendering cost increases due to large number of contractors taking part.
d) an unscrupulous contractor may submit unrealistic tender sum compare with the reputable
contractors.
e) standard of workmanship and quality of works were unsure or no guarantee.
a) a short list of the contractors is drawn up who are considered to be suitable and capable to carry
out the proposed project through recommendation by client and consultants to be invited to
tender.
b) the Code of Procedure for Selective tendering recommend a list of five to eight tenderers
according to the value of the contract. The time for tendering shall be not less than four weeks
and shall be related to the size of the project.
Advantages:
a) only capable and approved contractors submit their tenders i.e. reputable contractors.
b) reduce the tender documentation charges as the number of tenderers is small.
c) reduce tender reporting time.
Disadvantages:
a) the tenders submitted may not be competitive as reputable contractors are invited and the
number is small. (contractor is reputable, they will not simply submit the tender)
b) many good contractors have no chance to be invited since they do not know to the client or
consultants. (recommendation to contractor – good contractor maybe 2 to 3 contractors,
but the rest good contractor will not be invited)
2.3. Negotiated tenders
a) a contract to be negotiated with a single contractor nominated by the client instead of resulting
from the process of competitive tendering.
b) the rates and prices are discussed with the assistance of QS. This may be done using BQ or
Schedules of Rates prepared by QS instead of the contractor pricing the tender document on his
own for evaluation.
c) sometime the contractor will price the tender document first to provide a basis for the
negotiation. The client’s QS will go through the rates and to reach an agreeable unit rates with
the contractor to arrive at the contract sum.
Advantages:
a) reduction in tendering costs; only one set of tender documents need to be prepared.
b) more realistic rates and prices are obtained through negotiations with expert input by the CQS.
c) a reliable and reputable contractor selected.
d) contractor has a greater awareness of the client’s requirements; most likely the subsidiary of the
client’s group of companies or same contractor for the same design completed in previous
contract satisfactorily.
e) the design team has the advantage of the contractor’s specialized knowledge with early
participation in the project.
Disadvantages:
a) one can never be sure that one has obtained the cheapest offer; although the services of a
competent professional CQS is involved but there is an assurance that the client get good value
for money for the works done. (reasonable price not cheapest price, cheapest price is for open
tendering)
b) difficult to explain why that firm was chosen in preference to all the other contractors which
would be equally good if not better. Normally; the reason is because of the previous contract
was done satisfactory or may be the subsidiary of a client’s construction arm.
c) time taken to award may be reduced since single negotiation only but sometime negotiations
takes times.