Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ANSI S2.42-1982
(ASA 46-1982)
Standards Secretariat
. I
Acoustical Society of America
335 East45thStreet .
New York, New York 10017
c i
ANSI S2.42-1982
(ASA 46-1982)
Standards Secretariat
Acoustical Society of America
335 East 45th Street
New York, New York 1O01 7
ABSTRACT
Thisstandardclassifies rotorsinto groups by their balancingrequirements as in-
fluenced by the rotor’s flexural stiffness and unbalancedistribution. Certain classes of
rotors may be balanced by normal or modified rigid rotor techniques. Other more
flexible rotors may require high-speed balancing. The fundamentals of flexible rotor
balancing are discussed as well as methods of assessment of final unbalance. Guid-
ance is given on judging the final balance quality, however, this standard is not in-
tended to serve as an acceptance specification for any rotor group. It is offered to
provide direction on how toavoid gross deficiencies or unattainable requirements.
Published by the American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America
i
This standard was approved by the American National Standards Institute as ANSI S2.42-1982 on 2
December 1982.
An American National Standard implies a consensus of those substantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An American
National Standard is intended as guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an American
National Standard does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standard ornot, from manufacturing, mar-
keting, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standard. American National Standards are
subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions.
Caution Notice: An American National Standard may be revisedor withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National
ii
This standard was developed by the International Organizationfor Standardization, IS0 Technical Committee
108 with considerable assistance from the American National Standards Institute Committee S2. The work of
ANSI Committee S2 was performed under the secretariat of the Acoustical Society of America. This standardis
the American counterpart of IS0 5406 The Mechanical Balancing of Flexible Rotors. Future editions of this
standard are expected to incorporate features from IS0 5343 Criteria for Evaluating Flexible Rotor Balance.
American National Standards S2, which participated in the development of this standard, has the following
scope:
Standards, specifications, methods of measurement and test, and terminology, in the fields of mechanical shock and vibration, but
excluding those aspects which pertain to biological safety, tolerance, and comfort.
This standard was processed and approved for publication by the Acoustical Society of America following
approval by American-National Standards Committee S2.
At the time this standard was submitted to Standards Committee S2 for approval, the membership wasas
follows:
Acoustical Society of America o P. H. Maedel, ]r., G. Booth National Bureau of Standards o M. R. Serbyn, D. R. Flynn (Alt)
American Boat & Yacht Council o E. J. Reinelt National Council of Acoustical Consultants o G. C. Tocci, D.
American Mining Congress o G.R. Coonan, H. Bradley Johnson D. Reynolds (Alt)
(Alt) National Electrical Manufacturers Association o D. V. Wright,
American Society for Quality Control o (Vacant) J. R. Keinz (Alt)
American Society for Testing and Materials (liaison) o J. W. National Fluid Power Association o J. C. White, J. I. Morgan
Goff (A It)
American Society ofHeating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Naval Air Systems Command o (vacant)
Engineers o P. K. Baade, P. Ostergaard (Alt) Naval Biodynamics laboratory o J. Guignard, C. L. Ewing (Alt)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers o (Vacant) Naval Ship Research and Development Center 'o E. T. Habib,
Anti-Friction Bearing Manufacturers Association o J. C. Morri- A. Zaloumis (Alt)
son Society of Automotive Engineers o S . Rubin, M. L. Stoner Mlt)
Automobile Manufacturers Association o R. J. Wasko Society of Experimenfal Stress Analysis o E. G. Fischer
Canadian Standards Association (liaison) o T. D. Northwood, Telephone Group o J. W. Scott
G. Michael (Alt) U.S. Army Electronics Command o R. E. Ferrell
Compressed Air and Gas Institute o J. Addington U.S. Department of the Air Force (liaison) o R. N. Bingman, R.
Electronic Industries Association o (Vacant) F. Wilkus (IstAlt), J. P. Henderson (2ndAlt)
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) o D. Gray, L. Gray (Alt) U.S. Department of Defense o H. Pusey, R. J. Volin (Alt)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) o R. G. U.S. Department of Transportation o J. E. Weder
Bartheld U.S. Navy Department-Naval Sea Systems Command o L. A.
Institute of Environmental Sciences o H. Pusey Herstein 111, K. Hartrnan (Alt)
Instrument Society of America o E. A. Starr U.S. Navy Ordinance System Command (NAVORD) o (Vacant)
Maritime Administration o N.O. Hammer, R. Schubert (Alt)
iii
Suggestions for improvements in this standard will be welcomed. They should be sent to the Standards Secre-
tariat, Acoustical Society of America, 335 East 45th Street, New York, New York 10017.
O INTRODUCTION 2 REFERENCES
This American National Standard classifies rotors IS0 1925-1981-Balancing-Vocabulary.
into groups in accordance with their balancing re- ANSI S2.19-1975-Balance Quality of Rotating Rigid
quirements, specifies methods of assessment of final Bodies.
unbalance, and gives initial guidance of fina€ balance IS0 2953-1975-Balancing Machines-Description
quality criteria. and Evaluation, in Preparation.
As the next stage in the development of these ba-
lance quality grades, the criteria for evaluating the un-
balance of flexible rotors will be further described in
an addendum to this American National Standard. 3 DEFINITIONS
As this American National Standard is complemen-
tary in many detailsto ANSI S2.19-1975 BalanceQua- 3.1 The definitions relating to mechanical balancingin
lity of Rotating Rigid Bodies it is recommended that, International Standard I S 0 1925-1981 and many of
where applicable,the two should be consideredtogeth- the definitions relating to vibration and shock in I S 0
er. 2041 are applicable to this standard.
3.2 For the convenience of users of this standard, the
1 SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION following terms and definitions are repeated from IS0
1925-1981 (in the case of 3.4 and 3.15 the entries are
This American National Standard classifies rotors adapted from IS0 1925-1981)..
into groupsin accordance with their balancing re- 3.3 rigid rotor: A rotor is considered rigid when the
quirements, establishes methods of assessment of fmal unbalance can be corrected in any two (arbitrarily se-
unbalance, and gives initial guidance on the establish- lected) planes and, after that correction, its unbalance
ment of balance quality grades so that, ultimately, ba- does not significantly exceed the balancing tolerances
lance quality grades can be established for all types of (relative to the shaft axis) at any speed upto maximum
flexible rotors. servicespeed and when running under conditions
All rotors are therefore classified to indicate which which approximate closely to those of the final sup-
can be balanced by normal or modified rigidrotor bal- porting system.
ancingtechniques and which require some form of 3.4 flexible rotor: A rotor not satisfying definition3.3
high-speed balancing. Classification of rotors into dif- due to elastic deflection.
ferent categories permits the use of simplified balanc- 3.5 bearing support: The part, or series of parts, that
ing methods for some rotors. For all other rotors, suit- transmits the load from the bearing to the main body
able balancing methods are recommended. of the structure.
AS in the case of ANSI S2.19-1975, this American 3.6 foundation: A structure that supports the mechani-
National Standard is not intended to serve as an accep- cal system.
tance specification for any rotor group, but rather to
NOTES:
give indications of how to avoid gross deficiencies as
well as exaggerated or unattainable requirements. (1) The foundation may be fixed in space or may undergo a mo-
tion that provides excitation for the supporfed system.
Nevertheless, it may serve asa basis for more involved
investigations, for example when a more exact deter- (2) In the context of the balancing and vibration of rotating ma-
mination of the required balance quality is necessary. chines, the term “foundation” is usually applied to the heavy base
structure on which the whole machine is mounted.
If due regard is paid to the specified limits or methods
of manufacture and balance, satisfactory running con- 3.7 controlled initial unbalance: Initial unbalance
ditions can most probably be expected. However,there which has been minimized by individual balancing.of
may be cases where deviationsfrom this standard may components and/or careful attention todesign, manu-
be necessary. facture, and assembly of the rotor.
1
3.8 flexural critical speed: A speed of a rotor at which 3.15 thermally inducedunbalance: That change of
.there is maximum flexureof the rotor and where that condition exhibited by a rotor if its state of unbalance
flexure is significantly greater than the motion of the is significantlyaltered by its temperature changes.
journals. NOTE The change of condition may be permanent or tempo-
3.9 flexural principal mode: For undamped rotor/ rary.
bearingsystems, that mode shape which the rotor 3.16 low-speed balancing (relating to flexible rotors):
takes up at one of the (rotor) flexural critical speeds. A procedure of balancing at a speed wherethe rotor to
3.10 modal balancing: A procedure for balancing flexi- be balanced can be considered rigid.
ble rotors in which balancecorrections are made to re- 3.17 high-speed balancing (relating to flexible rotors):
duce the amplitude of vibration in the separate signifi- A procedure of balancing at speeds where the rotor to
cant principal flexuralmodes to withinspecified be balanced cannot be considered rigid.
limits.
3.11 nth modal unbalance: That unbalance which af-
fects onlythe nthprincipal modeof the deflection con-
figuration of a rotorhearing system.
4 FUNDAMENTALS OF FLEXIBLE ROTOR
DYNAMICS WITH RESPECT TO
NOTE This nth modal unbalance is not asingle unbalance but BALANCING
an unbalance distribution U, (z) in the nth principal mode. It can be
mathematically represented with respect to its effect on the nth prin-
cipal mode by a single unbalance vector U, obtained from the for-
mula: 4.1 The Motion of a Flexible Rotor
ANSI S2.42-1982 3
If the shaft starts to rotate about the shaft axis with point along the rotor depends on the bending deflec-
an angular velocity W ,the thin slice starts to rotate in tion of the rotor at that point.
its own plane with speed W about an axis through E. A
The correction of unbalance in axial planes along
centrifugal force me w 2is thus experienced by the slice. the rotor other than those in which the unbalance oc-
This force is transverse to the shaft axis and may be
curs may induce vibrations at speeds other than thatat
accompanied at other cross sections alongthe shaft by
which the rotor was originally corrected. In many cir-
similar forces which are likely to vary in magnitude
cumstances the vibrations may exceed specified toler-
and direction along the shaft. These forces cause the ances, particularly at critical speeds.
shaft to bend and the deflection modifiesthe resultant
forces experiencedby the shaft. Rotors which become heated during operation are
susceptible to thermal distortions which can lead to
Satisfactory operation of the shaft can be specified variations in the unbalance.
in terms of one of the following:
(a) Vibration induced by the unbalance forces; 4.3 Flexible Rotor Mode Shapes
(b) Limitson the resultant forces applied by the If damping is neglected, the modes of a rotor are
shaft to the bearings, the flexural principal modes and, for a rotor supported
(c)Residual unbalance. in “isotropic” bearing, are plane curves rotating about
the shaft axis. Typical curves for the three lowest prin-
In all cases in which it is necessary to reduce the uni
cipal modes for a simple rotor supported in flexible
balance forces, this is usually achieved by attaching a
bearings near to its ends are illustrated in Fig. 2.
suitable axial distribution of correction masses along
the shaft. It is not practical, and indeed not necessary,
to balance the shaft exactly (that is to make e zero at
all cross sectionsalong the shaft), so that there will in-
variable be some residual unbalance distributed along
the shaft.
I I
a) Typical rotor
4.2 Unbalance Distribution
For adamped rotor bearingsystem the flexural the mode in question and by the amount of damping
modes may be space curves rotating about the shaft experienced by the rotor system in this condition.
axis, especiallyin the case of substantial damping, aris-
If the component of unbalance in aparticular mode
ing perhaps from fluid-film bearings. A possible sub-
is reduced by a number of discrete masses, then the
stantially damped second mode is illustrated in Fig. 3.
corresponding modal component of deflection is simi-
In many cases the damped modes can be treated ap-
larly reduced. The reduction of the modal components
proximately as principal modes and hence regarded as
in this way formsthe basis of two ofthe balancing pro-
rotating plane curves.It must be stressed that the form
cedures described in Appendix A.
of the mode shapes and the response of the rotor are
strongly influenced bythe dynamic properties and axi- If the rotor has a speed close to its first flexural
al locations of the bearings and their supports. critical value, then the deflection shape of the rotor
tends to approximateto that shown in Fig. 2(b). Simi-
larly, the deflection shapes of the rotor when rotating
4.4 Response of a Flexible Rotor to at speeds in the vicinity of its second or third critical
Unbalance speeds resemble those shown in Figs. 2(c)and 2(d). Si-
milar apply to the higher modes.
Theunbalance distribution can beexpressedin
terms of modal components and the deflection in each Principal modes of the type shown in Figs. 2(b) to
mode is caused by the corresponding modal compo- 2(d) determine the modal components of unbalance.
nent of unbalance. Moreover,the response of the rotor Moreover the balancingeffectproducedby a given
in the vicinity of critical speed is usuallypredominant- correction in a particular mode depends on the ordi-
ly in the associated mode.The rotor modal response is nate of the mode shape curve at the axial location of
a maximum at the rotor critical speed corresponding the correction. Thus a balancing mass attached to the
to that mode. Thus, when a rotor rotates at a speed rotor inFig. 2(a) in the plane P, willproduce no
near to a critical speed, it is disposed to adopta deflec- charge in the response in thesecond mode. Similarly a
tion shape corresponding to the mode associated with correction mass attached in either P, or P, will not af-
this critical speed, The degree to which large ampli- fect the response in the third mode. Conversely, a bal-
tudes of rotor deflection occur in these circumstances ancing mass in planeP, will produce the maximum ef-
is determined bothby the component of unbalance in fect on the first mode. If the rotor-bearing system has
substantial damping, therotor deflectionwill form -In practice the number of axial locations that are
space curves, which are related to the damped mode available for use as correction planes is often limited
shapes mentionedabove. A typical deflection curve bydesign considerations (and in fieldbalancing by
under such circumstances for speeds near the second limitations on accessibility). An adequate number of
critical speed would resemble that shown in Fig. 3. correction planes should be included at the design
stage. For turbine rotors, usually twoend planes and a
4.5 Objectives of Flexible Rotor Balancing mid-span plane are available. For generator rotors, a
minimum of two end planes and a mid-spanplane
It has already been observed that it is not practical have customarily been availablein the balancing facili-
to balance a rotor exactly, that is, to ensure that the ty. For larger machines (with more flexible rotors and
offset e is zero at all cross sections along the rotor. In- more critical speedsbelow the maximum operating
deed, the aims of balancing are many and are primar- speed), two additional planes or multiple planes have
ily determined by the operational requirements of the been used
by
some manufacturers. Centrifugal
machine. Before balancing any particular rotor it is de- compressor rotors are usuallyassembly-balanced in
sirable to decide what criteria of balance can be re- the end planes only after each disk and the shaft have
garded as adequate. In this way the balancing process been separately balanced in a low speed balancing ma-
can be made efficient and economical and still satisfy chine. With such restrictions, considerable ingenuity is
the needs of the user. often required from the balancing engineer.
Balancing in general is usually a process whereby
rotor vibration or bearing forcesare reduced to within 4.7 Rotors Coupled Together
appropriate specifiedtolerances. For someapplica-
tions it isonlynecessary to balance rotors at one When assessing coupledrotors, the nomenclature of
speed, but in many cases the vibrations or oscillatory the critical speeds requires some clarification for the
forces due to unbalance must be reduced to low levels following reason. Consider two rotors. Each rotor has
over a range of speed, including several critical speeds. a series of critical speeds and mode shapes that are
usually different from those of the other rotor. When
It should also be rememberedthat theeventual aim
the two rotors are coupled together, the complete unit
of balancing isto ensure satisfactory running of the ro-
will also have a series of critical speeds and modes
tor in its operating environment and not only in the
shapes. However, these speedsare neither equal to nor
balancing facility. To this end it may be desirable to
simply related to the critical speeds of the uncoupled
simulate service support conditions in specifying bear-
rotors. Moreover, the deflection shape of each part of
ings for the balancing facility. Thus the bearings and
the coupled unit, when vibratingin one of the coupled
pedestals used for balancing should reproduce to the
principal modes,need not besimplyrelated to any
necessary extent the mass and stiffness of the service
mode shape of the corresponding uncoupled rotor. In
bearings.
theory, therefore, the unbalance distribution along two
or more coupled rotors should be treated in terms of
416 Provision for Correction Planes modal components with respect to thecoupled system
and not to the modes of the uncoupled rotors.
Correction masses are attached to a rotor to coun-
teract the effect of an initial lack of balance. Although In practice, however,it is desirablefor simplicity of
the unbalance invariably has a random distribution production processes that each rotor should be bal-
along the rotor, the correction masses are discrete in anced separately as an uncoupled shaft. Although no
magnitude, in axial location along the rotor, and in an- simple general indications can be formulated, it is of-
gular location around the rotor. Rotors are often bal- ten possible to make approximate comparisons
anced in a model sequence and in this process correc- between the coupled and uncoupled mode shapes and
tion masses are situated along the rotorso that at each critical speeds, and in most cases such an approxima-
stage in the balancing procedure the new correction tion is adequate to ensure satisfactory operation of the
masses do not disturb modes already balanced (seeAp- coupled rotors. The degree to which this simple tech-
pendix A). The exact number of axial locations along nique is practicable depends on the mode shapes and
the rotor that are needed for this process depends to the critical speeds of the uncoupled and coupled ro-
some extent on the particular balancing procedure tors, the stiffness of the coupling and coupling shaft
which is adopted. Generally, however,if the operating sections, the distribution of unbalance (which is not
speed of the rotor exceeds its nth critical speed, then at known) and the unbalance and especially the machin-
+
(n 2) correction planes (transverse to the rotor axis) ing errors in the coupling assembly.The success of the
are likely to be needed along the rotor. technique is assistedif the coupling is flexible, it must,
however be emphasized that, strictly speaking, each 5.2 Class 2 rotors are subdivided (see Table I) into:
rotor may only be considered separately for balancing
(a) Rotors in which the axial distribution of unbal-
purposes providedthat, when forming part of the cou-
ance is known (classes 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d); also
pled system, its modal deflection shapes do not differ
class 2e in which the axial distribution is partly
from its uncoupled mode shapes. On the other hand,
known);
balancing a single-span rotor according to its mode
shapes is not an aim in itself. If modal balancing tech- (b) Rotors in which the axial distribution of unbal-
niques are used, the finalgoalis to gaininformation, as ance is not known(class2f,2g, and 2h).
accurately as possible, about theunbalance and its dis-
The subdivision of class 2 rotors shows the many rea-
tribution along the rotor, and asfar as possible to cor-
sons why rotors can often by balanced satisfactorilyat
rect the Over the speedrange' If this lowspeed as rigid rotors even though they are flexible.
reached it is not necessary that the modal shapes or
Some rotors will fit into more than one categoryof the
natural frequencies should be the same when balancing
division.
and when the rotor is running in situ.
5.3 Class 3 is subdivided (see TableI) because the bal-
When
two
each supported in its ancing techniques, criteria, and bearing
requirements
own bearings, are coupled together, provided the cou- my differ substantially for different rotors,
pling does not form a significant overhung mass on ei-
ther rotor by comparison with the rotor mass, it is 5.4 A subdivision of class 4 rotors is indicated in 7.4.
probable that each rotor may be balanced separatelyas
an independent rotor.
6 FACTORS GOVERNING THE
CLASSIFICATION OF CLASS 2 ROTORS
5 6.1
CLASSIFCCATION General
A low-speed balancing machine considers only the
5*1 For the Puvoses thisAmerican National Stan-
Of static and coupleunbalances in a rotor and does not .
dard, rotors are divided into fivemainclasses as evaluate the effect of deflection due tomodalcompon-
shownbelow and Table I*Eachdifferent ents ofunbalance.Some rotors thatare balanced in
a
therefore
techniques.
balancing
may
low-speed
machine vibrate excessively
both when running throughcritical speeds and at ser-
Class 1-A rotor whoseunbalancecanbecorrectedinvicespeed. H ~ it ispossible
~ in~ circum- ~
~ ~ ,
two (arbitrarily selected) planes $0 that, after the cor- stances to balance a rotor in a low-speed machine SO
rection, its unbalance does not change significantly at that not only are the static and couple unbalances can-
anyspeed UP the maximumservicespeed. Rotors ofcell& but also the remainingmodalunbalances are
this type can becorrected byrigid rotor balancingsufficientlysmall to ensure satisfactory running when
methods. (Recommendations for the balancing Of rigid the rotor is installed in its final environment.
rotors are given in ANSI S2.19-1975.)
Class 2-A rotor that cannot be considered figid but The 2ìIImU-It of Imkìl Unbalance remaining in a ro-
that can be balancedusingrigid rotor balanc- tor after the static and coupleunbalances are corrected
techniques.
depend
partially
ing
will the on shapes
modal of the rotor
class 3-A rotor that cannot'bebalanced usingmodi- and the axial positionsof the unbalances relativeto the
fiedrigid rotor balancing techniques but instead re- correction planes used*
quires the use of high-speed balancing methods. To assess to what extent it is likely that low-speed
Class G A rotor that could fall into classes 1, 2, Or 3 balancing will be successful,it is necessary to consider
but has in addition one or more components that are the factors that follow,
themselves flexible or flexibly attached.
Class 5-A rotor that could fall into class 3 but for
somereason,forexample,economy, is balanced for
6.2 Mass Distribution of the Rotor
one speed of operation only.
No generalrule can be laiddownregarding the
mass distribution of the rotor except that, if the axial
NOTE The number of modes that areconsidered in the balanc-
ing operation is not necessarily an indication of the number of criti-
positions of the unbalances are known, the balancing
cal speeds through which a rotor passes as it is run up to maximum planes beprovided in the most axial
service speed. positions to cancel ofthe effect the unbalances.
ANSI S2.42-1982 7
Gear wheel
I
Grinding wheel
-
Clos¶2c A rotor with more than two transverseplanes
of unbalance.
Compressor rotor
Clsu 2f
ANSI S2.42-1982 9
be calculated using the methods described in Appen- However,where the axiallocationsof the unba-
dix C. lances are not known it is often possibleto achieve an
acceptable state of balance usinga low-speed baiancing
For example, ifa rotor is manufactured fromindivi-
machine by controlling the initial unbalance of the ro-
dual components that are treated by some method si-
tor (Le., beforefinalbalancing) during manufacture
milar to thatoutlined in 6.3, then the axial distribution
and assembly.Theseprocedures are dealt within
of unbalance of the assembled rotor can be kept under
7.2.6, 7.2.7, and 7.2.8.
control and a higher initial unbalance can be tolerated.
With the other rotors, the axial distribution of unbal- On the other hand, rotors that do not fulfill all the
ance maybe random andtherefore not so well known. conditions for rigid or for class 2 flexible rotors as de-
scribed in this American National Standard may re-
In cases of random axial distribution that occur in
quire methods of balancing other than those that are
rotors such as those for large steam turbine, it may
possible in a low-speed balancing machine. These are
happen that the sources of unbalance are close to the
dealth with in 7.3 to 7.5.
correction planes. It is then often found that consider-
able amounts of initial unbalance can be corrected in a
low-speed balancing machine with satisfactory results
at service speeds. 7.2 Balancing Procedures for Class 2 Rotors
However,when the sources of unbalance are at 7.2.1 Class 2a Rotors with a Single Transverse
some distance from the correction planes, it may be Plane of Unbalance
found that only very small amounts of initial unbal-
If the initial unbalance is known to be wholly con-
ance canbe corrected in this way.
tained in one transverse planeand the balancing is also
It is outside the scope of this American National carried out in this plane, then the rotor will be bal-
Standard to comparethe cost of high-speed balancing anced for all speeds.
with the cost of assembling to such close tolerances
that the initial unbalance is sufficiently controlled to In these circumstances, the unbalance can be cor-
avoid all necessity for high-speed balancing.Each case rected in a low-speed balancing machine as effectively
should be treated on its merits and it may be found as at service speed, provided that the balancing ma-
expedient in some instances to assess the quality of the chine has adequate sensitivity.
running of a rotor through its intended service speed
range before deciding whether high-speed balancing is 7.2.2 Class 2b Rotors with Two Transverse
necessary. Planes of Unbalance
A rotor balanced in this ideal waywill not only When a rotor is composed of more than two sepa-
have no static and couple unbalancebut will also have rate components that are distributed axially, it is likely
no modal components of unbalance. Such a perfectly that there will be more than two transverse planes of
balanced rotor will then run satisfactorily at all speeds unbalance. A satisfactory state of balance may-how-
insofar as unbalance is concerned. ever-be achieved by balancing ainlow-speed balancing
Thus, in those cases wherethe axial locationsof the machineprovided that the methodsofmanufacture
unbalances in a rotor are known, any low-speed bal- and the precautions suggested in 6.3(b)are followed.
ancing technique which ensuresthat each unbalance is It is important to recognize that the assembly pro-
corrected in its own transverse plane will be satisfac- cess may produce changes in the shaft run-out that
tory. Such procedures are dealt with in 7.2.1 to 7.2.5. may subsequently change during high-speed service.
ANSI S2.42-1982 11
In some cases were a gross unbalance may occur in 7.2.5 Class 2e Rotors with a Rigid Core
a single component it may be consideredadvantageous
to balance this separately before mounting it on the ro- If the unbalance in the rotor is kn0wn to be con-
tor, in addition to carrying out the balancing proce- tained wholly within a substantially rigid section of the
dure after it
mounted.
is rotor and
the balancing
is carried out also
within this
section, then the unbalance will be zero in all modes.
Such a rotor that has a rigid core and flexibility der-
ived solely from flexible shafts can be balanced on a
7.2.4 Class 2d Rotor with Uniformly Distributed
low-speed balancing machine provided the unbalance
or Linearly Varying Unbalance
corrections are carried out at correction planes located
If, because of design or method of construction, a within the rigid core section of the rotor,
rotor has unbalances that are distributed uniformly
along the entire length of the rotor (for example a
tube), it may be possibleby a suitable axial disposition 7.2.6 Class 2f Symmetrical Rotors with
of two balancing planesto achieve satisfactory running Controlled Initial Unbalance (two
over the entire speed range by balancing in a low-speed correction planes)
balancing machine.
When a rotor is composed of separate components
It is likely that the optimum disposition of the two that are individually balanced before assembly as out-
balancing planes to give the best overall running con- lined in 6.3(a), a satisfactory state of balance may be
ditions can only be determined by experimentation on achieved in a low-speed balancing machine provided
a number of rotors of similar type. The method is the initial unbalance of the completed rotor does not
based on probability that rotors of such design will exceed specified tolerances.
have a similar axial distribution of unbalance.
For such rotors, the axial distribution and magni-
It is shown and inAppendix E that for a simple ro- tude of the unbalance of the complete assembly will
tor system (comprising a single span rotor with uni- not be known. Since the maximum speed of this class
form or linear distribution of unbalance, no overhangs, of rotor does not significantly approach the second
uniform mass and flexibility, and operating speeds sig- critical speed, the most unfavorable case that will oc-
nificantlybelowsecond critical speed) the optimum cur with a given distribution of unbalance is when the
position for the two balancing planes is 22% of the individual contributions of the assembled components
bearing span inboard of each bearing. to theresultant unbalance have the same angular posi-
If rotors of this type have balancing planes in the tion. It is then possible to estimate the maximum ini-
middle and at their ends, it is possible to balance the tial unbalance of the assembly that may becorrected in
rotors satisfactorily by three-plane balancing which two correction planes and that will result in satisfac-
may be carried out in a low-speed balancing machine. tory running conditions.
(c)Uniform bending flexibilityof the shaft along its 7.2.7 Class 2g Symmetrical Rotors with
length; Controlled Initial Unbalance (three
(d)Continuous service speeds belowand not signifi- correction planes)
cantly approaching second critical speed.
For rotors that conform to the requirements in
For such rotors, Appendix E shows how the ba- 7.2.6 but that have in addition a third, central correc-
lance correction required at the center plane can be tion plane, then, provided that itis possibleto hold the
found directly from the initial dynamic unbalance initial unbalance of the complete rotor to within twice
measured at the two end correction planes. the permissible initial unbalance arrived at in7.2.6, the
ANSI S2.42-1982 13
7.3.2.6 Add a pair of trial masses to the rotor to affect NOTE The balancing speed should be lower than 50% of the
the unbalance in second mode. These should be posi- first flexural critical speedof the rotor.
tioned in radial planes 180" apart and proportioned so
that the balance in first mode is not affected. Note
'
7.3.3.3 Balance the rotor at low speed, using the end
readings of bearing vibrations or forces at exactly the
correction planes for the couple unbalance,and, if pos-
same speed as in 7.3.2.5.
sible, planes distributed over the rotor length for the
7.3.2.7 From readings obtained in 7.3.2.5 and 7.3.2.6, static unbalance.
compute and correct the unbalance in second modeus-
ing a pair of correction masses which retain the pro- 7.3.3.4 Balance in fist mode by the method indicated
portionality and axial positions of the trail masses. in 7.3.2.2, 7.3.2.3, and 7.3.2.4 but using a configura-
tion of masses disposedin three balancing planes.The
The rotor should not run at any speed up to and masses must be so chosen that the first modal compo-
through first and second critical speeds without any nent of unbalance is annulled and the rigid rotor ba-
significant amplificationof vibration. lance is not upset. A suitable set of masses complying
7.3.2.8 Continue the above operations for successive with these conditions can be computed from the rotor
modes until themaximum balancing speed isattained. structure analysis data if such data are available for
At each stage, choose correction masses so that they the complete rotorhearing system, or it can be found
do not upset the balance already achieved in thelower experimentally byadding a known trial mass to the ro-
modes. tor as in 7.3.2.3. Then find the two unbalances in the
end correction planes that compensate for its effect on
7.3.2.9 If significant vibrations or bearing forces still the low-speed balancing, as in 7.3.3.3. Such a set of
occur at maximumbalancingspeed,theywillbe three masses can therefore be used for annulling the
caused by unbalance in modes whose critical speeds first modal component of unbalance without upsetting
are higher than that maximum speed.Correct these by the rigid rotor balance achieved in 7.3.3.3.
the addition of suitable corrections which do not affect
the lower modes. In this case, however, it will not be The rotor should now run at any speed up to and
possible to magnify the effect of unbalance in any of through the first critical speed without any significant
these higher modes by running close to their associat- amplification of vibration.
ed critical speeds. Some knowledge therefore of the
shapes of the higher modes may be helpful in correct- 7.3.3.5 Follow the steps specified in 7.3.2.5 to 7.3.2.9
ing these residual unbalances. but in each casethe corrections must be chosen so that
they correct the mode under consideration without af-
fecting the lower modesand without affecting the rigid
NOTES: rotor balance.
(1) At speeds near to a critical speed the effect of unbalance in Suitable sets of balance masses mayagain be found
the associated mode willbe greatly magnified andso the vibrations by computation or experimentally by extending the
or bearing forces will be largely caused byunbalancein the mode. If method described in 7.3.3.4 so that the lower modes,
there is a significant interaction from modes other thanthe one be-
ing corrected, techniques for the separationof the modes are avail- already annulled, are not affected. Thus, after conclu-
able. sion of balancing in the nthmode, a singletrial mass of
known amount should be added to therotor in a plane
(2) Instead of bearing vibrations or forces, the shaft vibration or
other suitable response data maybe used. where it has maximum effect on the next higher mode,
and then balancing up to the nth mode should be re-
peated. This will result in the mass set needed for an-
nulling the (n + 1)thmode without upsetting either the
7.3.3 Method 2 (Combined Rigid Rotor and rigid rotor balance or the modal balanceup to the nth
Modal Balancing) mode.
7.3.3.1 Mount the rotor in a balancing machine, pre-
The rotor should now run from low speedup to and
ferably of the hard-bearing type becausethese ma-
through all (n + 1) critical speeds without any signifi-
chines more closely simulate site conditions. This is
cant ampli6cation of vibration.
particularly necessary for rotors requiring correction
in more than twomodes, for unsymmetrical rotors, 7.3.3.6 Final balancing at service speed may be added
and for rotors with heavy overhung masses. if necessary as described in 7.3.2.9 but in some cases
7.3.3.2 If only a soft bearing machine is available, it the rigid rotor balancing at low speed mayensure suf-
may be necessary to make trim balancing corrections ficiently smooth running at service speed, providedall
in situ. accessible modesof unbalance have beenannulled.
7.3.4 Method 3 (Influence Coefficient Matrix 7.3.4.4 Select suitable balancing speedsml, oz.
..o,.
Balancing) NOTE: It may be necessary to conduct a balancing operationat
only the lower speeds before the higher speeds are attainable.
7.3.4.1 The influencecoefficient matrix method is 7.3.4.5 Measure and record the vibration at each of the
usually an automatic procedure under the control of a n transducers for each of the m speeds. Let the vibra-
digital computer. tion at the ith transducer for the speed wk be b, (K).
7.3.4.6 Attach a trial mass of known magnitudem,,at
7.3.4.2 The basic assumptionof the method is that the a knownradius rl in correction plane 1 at a knownori-
rotor vibration at the measurement locations results entation angle tell around the rotor from some angular
from the rotor unbalance distribution which is consi- reference location.
dered to be represented as a number of discrete unba- 7.3.4.7 Again measureand record the vibration at each
lances located in the selected correction planes. Thus of the n measuring planesfor each of the m speeds. Let
the rotor response [b ] is assumed to be related to this the vibration vector at the ithtransducer for the speed
discrete unbalancedistribution [ U ]by the influence co- w k be bil (K).
efficient matrix [A 1, such that 7.3.4.8 Remove the trial mass from the plane 1 and at-
tach a trial mass mj in. correction plane j at a known
P l = [A 1 [ U ] . radius rj and a known angular position +hj.
In this equation [b] is the vector of p rotor response 7.3.4.9 Measure and record the vibration at each of the
measurements, [A ] is thep X q array of influence coeffi-
n measuring planes for each of the m speeds. Let the
cients, and [U]is the vector of q rotor unbalance ele-
vibration at the ith transducer for the speed wk be b,
ments (q correction planes). (Responsedata areusually
taken at more than one rotor speed. Thus often (KI.
p = m X n, where m is the number of balancing speeds 7.3.4.10 Perform the operations specifiedin7.3.4.8
and n is the number of measuring locations.) Each of and 7.3.4.9 for j = 2, 3,...4.
the elements of [b 1, [A 1, and [ U ]has associated withit 7.3.4.11 Obtain the required balance corrections q.
a phase angleas well as a magnitude.In the case of [b ] and their angular locations gj using a procedure such
these are denoted by A and b, respectively, with appro- asthat describedinAppendixA. This procedure
priate suffixes. The rotor response data are measured usually involves the use of a digital computer.
directly; the influencecoefficients are usually deter-
7.3.4.12Usually, the number ofresponsemeasure-
mined by placing a trial mass in each balancing plane
ments does not equal the number of correction planes
in turn, and recording the change in rotor response
and [ C ] is chosento minimize the rotor response after
due tothe trial mass. Once the rotor response (bjl ) and
balancing with a least-squares procedure.
influencecoefficients (a,) are known, the equation
above may be solved for the rotor unbalance vector[U] 7.3.4.13 Because of the different amplification of the
-
or, equivalently, the balance correction [ C ] = [U]. rotor modes at different speeds, it is often advisable to
If the number of rotor responsemeasurements n use more than one balancing speed. The number of
equals the number of correction planes q, [ C ] can be transducers can sometimes be reduced if more balanc-
chosen to make the resultant rotor response identically ing speeds are used.
zero at the measuring locations and at the balancing
speeds. 7.3.4.14 Care should be taken with the influence coeffi-
cient procedure if a trial run is necessary through a
The procedurefor determining the matrix [A ] is de- critical speed.
scribed in 7.3.4.3 to 7.3;4. l l below and the underlying
analysis is given in Appendix A. The matrix [A ] may 7.3.4.15 The influence coefficient matrix may be near-
be influenced bythe degree of randomness in the mea- ly singular if the positions of the correction planes and
surements taken. In more advancedinfluencecoeffi- transducers and the balancing speeds are not chosen
cient methods, s€atisticalprocedures are used to over- sensibly.
come such problems. 7.3.4.16 In each plane, the radius at which the correc-
7.3.4.3 Install n transducers at suitable axial locations tion mass is attached will normally be equal to the ra-
to measure shaft or bearing vibration (n transducers at dius of the trial mass.
m shaft speeds, so that p = m X n). Select also q pre- 7.3.4.17 To improve results, it is frequently advisable
scribed correction planes. The minimum valueof q de- to use combinationsof masses insuitable planes rather
pends on the objectives of the particular balance prob- than a single trial mass, the mass combinations being
lem being handled. similar to, but not necessarily equal to, the mass com-
ANSI S2.42-1982 15
binations recommended for the modal balancing tech- (b)The damping of the system is sufficiently highto
niques of methods 1 and 2 (see 7.3.2 and 7.3.3). suppress vibrations at the critical speeds to ac-
ceptable limits.
(c)The rotor is supported in a sufficiently elastic en-
7.4 Balancing Procedures for Class 4 Rotors vironment to prevent seriousvibrationsbeing
transmitted.
Rotors inthis class may havea basic shaft and body
construction that would fall into classes 1, 2, or 3. In (d) A high levelof vibration at the critical speeds is
addition they have one or more components that are acceptable.
either flexible or are flexibly mounted so that the ba- (e) A rotor runs at full speed for such long periods
lance of the whole system my change with change of that otherwise unacceptable starting conditions
speed. can be accepted in this case.
Rotors in this class may fallinto either of two cate- A rotor that fulfìlls any of the conditions above
gories: should be balanced in a high-speed balancingmachine
(a)Rotors whose balance changes continuously with or equivalent facility at the speed at which it is deter-
change of speed, for example rubber bladed fans; mined that the rotor should be in balance.
(b) rotors whose balance changes up to a certain If the rotor falls into category (c) above, it is espe-
speed and remains constant above that speed, cially important thatthe stiffness of the balancing ma-
for example rotors of single phase induction mo- chine bearings should imitate site conditions sufficient-
tors that carry a centrifugal starting switch. ly closely to ensure that at the balancing speed the
predominant modes are the same asthose that will be
It is sometimes possible to balance theserotors with experienced on site.
counterbalances of similar characteristics. If not, the
following procedures should be used. Some consideration should be givento theaxial ba-
lance weight distribution. Based on the probability
Rotors that fall into category (a) above should be that similar rotors will have similar unbalance distri-
balanced in a balancing machine at the speed at which bution, it may be possibleto choose optimum axial po-
it is specified that the rotorshould be in balance. sitions for the balancing planesand two planes may be
Rotors that fall into category (b)above maybe bal- sufficient. This may produce a minimum residual un-
anced at any speed above that at which the balance balance in the lower modes and thus minimize the vi-
ceases to change. brations when running through critical speeds.
Some rotors that are flexible and pass through one 8.1 General
or more critical speeds on their way up to full speed
may sometimes be required to be in balance for one Rotors fitted to machine or engines in quantity pro-
speed only (usually service speed). In general, rotors duction where, as is usually the case, the product un-
that fall into this class fulfillone or more of the follow- dergoes some developmentor proving tests before the
ing conditions: production run, will in general have the methods and
standard of balance checked and evaluated during the
development stage.
(a)The acceleration and deceleration up to and
from full speed isso rapid that the amplitude of Such rotors will have unbalance tolerances set ini-
vibration at thecritical speeds willnot build up tiallyonpastexperience. During the development
beyond acceptable limits. stage it will becomeapparent whether these tolerances
provide for a satisfactory level of vibration in the finalmachine. In most cases a subsequent high-speed check
product or whether some modifications are required, willbe made on the test bed or on site. In specific
either in the method of balancing or in the unbalance cases, by agreement between the manufacturer and the
tolerances, or indeed in the basic design. customer, the high-speed assessment may be dispensed
with and the rotor accepted on the basis of the final
After the development stage is completed, rotors low-speed balance.This can apply particularly to class
manufactured on the production run would be expect- 2 rotors sold as spares where a final assessmentat site
ed to behave satisfactorily in service if they are bal- may be delayed for a considerable time.
anced to the tolerances established during develop-
ment. The rotor should be complete and all attachments
such as half-couplings, gear wheels, etc. should be fit-
It may be possiblefor the final state of unbalance of ted.
such rotors to be evaluated in a low-speed balancing
machine and for limits of unbalance to be specified in If the rotor has an overhung mass that is flexibly
terms of unbalance remaining in thebalancing planes. coupled and thatwould normally besupported on site,
Where applicable, limits of initial unbalance may also a steady bearing may at the discretion of the manufac-
be specified. turer be used to support it in the balancing machine.
The object of the support is to ensure that the appro-
In other cases, for example, large generator rotors, priate mass is being carried by the workpiece and it is
prior development experience of the rotor in its final important to ensure that the method of support does
environment may not be possible. Thus a specification not introduce any questionable unbalance readings.
of unbalance remaining in the balancing planes can at
. present have little meaning as the factors that deter- The balancing machineshould be one that confirms
mine the effect of unbalance are not known. to International Standard IS0 2953-1975.
NOTES:
In these cases, it is therefore necessary to specify
limits of vibration resulting from residual unbalance (1) If the journal supportedby the steady bearingis offset dueto
and, at the same time, to specify the environmental a permanent bend in the shaft, unbalance simulating forces may be
set up. This could lead to an error in the final balance of the rotor.
conditions under which the evaluation is made. In spe-
cial cases the environmental conditions will be agreed (2) If required. by the customer, the operation and senstivity of
between the manufacturer and the purchaser. the balancing machine may be demonstrated by adding test weights
to the rotor equivalent to five times the claimed residual unbalance.
However, manyrotors, for example those which are Alternatively the full procedure described inI S 0 2953 may be used
mass produced, would normally besubmitted to much if a more exhaustive testis felt to be needed.
simpler assessment procedure than that detailed be-
Before the balance of the rotoris assessed,it should
low..
be run at some suitable speed to remove any tempo-
rary bend it may have taken.
8.2 Evaluation of Unbalance
When the above conditions have been satisfied, the
Evaluation of the final state of unbalance may be rotor should be run at the balancing speed and read-
carried out in one or more of the following situations, ings taken of amount and angle of unbalance remain-
depending on the type and purpose of the rotor being ing in each measuring plane, except in the case of class
assessed: 2a rotors where only one measuring plane is used.
(a) In a low-speed balancing machine; For class 2f and 2g rotors, the initial unbalance
should also be stated.
(b)In a high-speed balancingmachine or high-speed
balancing facility; In addition, for rotors that have been balanced in
stages or thathave beenmade up of balanced compon-
(c) On a test bed as an assembled machine; ents, the degree of balanceachieved at each stage
(d) At site in its final assembled condition. should be stated.
ANSI S2.42-1982 17
produce smooth running when it is finally installed on NOTE To establish thaf the coupling is introducingno unwant-
site. ed unbalance forces, the coupling shouldbe turned through 180" in
relation fo therotorandtheeffectnoted,assuggestedinANSI
S2.19-1975-Balance Quality of Rotating Rigid Bodies..
When special purpose balancing machine pedestals When the above conditions have been satisfied, the
that have variable resonances are used, they must be rotor should be run up to speed at anacceleration that
locked in one particular state of adjustment through- ensures that no peaks of vibration are suppressed. All
out the test. significantpeaks of vibrations should bemeasured
between 70% of the observed first critical speed and
If the rotor has an overhung mass that would nor- maximum service speed.
mally be supported when installed on site, a steady
bearing may be used to support it during the test. In The rotor should be heldat maximum service speed
some cases it may be acceptable to measure the unbal- for at least two minutes and vibration.
ance without having the overhung mass fitted and to
At the conclusion of the test at maximum service
measure the balance of this separately on a suitable
speed the rotor should be run toa specified overspeed,
mandrel.
if demanded by the specification.
If the rotor has an overhung mass that is not sup- NOTES
ported in any way when installed on site, it must be
(1) The overspeed to be attained will depend upon the overall test
left unsupported during the test. specification for the particular typeof rotor. Where no specification
Two vibration transducers shall be installed on each exists, agreement should be reached between the manufacturer and
the purchaser.
bearing pedestal90" apart on the same transverse plane
to permit resolution of the vertical and horizontal (2) In some cases, final overspeeding is forbidden.
transverse vibrations. After the rotor has been heldfor a specified timeat full
If isotropic bearings are used, the transducers may overspeed, if overspeed is demanded by the specifica-
be placed to sense the transverse vibrations in any ra- tion, it should bedecelerated to maximumservice
dial direction. speed and thesynchronous vibrations again measured.
NOTE: If significant changes of balance occuror are expectedto
As an alternative or additionally, shaft-riding occur due to overspeeding, the final balancing and evaluationof vi--
probes or noncontact proximity transducers may be bration should be carried out after overspeeding.
used to measure journal vibrations. These must be po-
sitioned as close as possible to the bearing inert and The rotor should then be decelerated and measure-
placed to sense vertical and horizontal transverse vi- ments of synchronous vibration should be taken at de-
brations. Their output should be read on equipment crements of speed of not more than 5% of full speed
that is able to differentiate between ambient effects, between the maximum service speed and 70% of the
slow-roll runout, and the vibrations due to unbalance. first critical speed. In addition, all peaks of total vibra-
tion should be noted. During the test the rateof decel-
In all cases, there should be no resonances of the
eration should not be greater than therate of accelera-
transducer mountings within the speed range of the
tion.
test.
If desired, the above tests may be taken only to full
The output from all transducers should be read on
speed and an initial run made for the full overspeed
equipment that is ableto differentiate betweenthe syn-
assessment. If this method is adopted then the first run
chronous component and other components of the vi-
should be as follows:
bration.
(a) the rotor should be accelerated up to full speed
The drive for the rotor should be such as to impose
with any convenient acceleration;
negligible restraint on the vibration of the rotor and
introduce negligible unbalance into the system. (b) the rotor should be held at full speed until all
readings have become reasonably steadyand vi- manner, using the same axial positionsfor the correc-
bration readings have been recorded. tion planes.
(c)at the end of the two minute run, speed should By agreement between the manufacturer and the
be increased to full overspeed for the specified customer, rotors in any class may be assessed in this
period of time; manner.
(d) at the conclusion of (c), the rotor should be The axial position of the correction planes and the
brought down in speedat anyconvenient decel- balancing speed should be stated for each stageof the
eration. balance check, i.e., for each mode.
If the rotor is assessed in a balancing machine hav-
ing its own instrumentation this should beused
8.5 Rotors Whose Final State of Unbalance is throughout the test.
Evaluated on the Test Bed If the rotor is assessed in an overspeed or similar
facility, the instrumentation and general installation of
Rotors whose final state of unbalance is evaluated
the rotor into the facility should be as stated in 8.4.
on the test bed should have an instrumentation and
test procedure as stated above but itshould be appreci- When the above conditions have been met, the ro-
ated that differentproceduresmaybenecessaryin tor should be run at each balancing speed inturn and
somë cases, for example: readings taken of the amplitude and angular position
of the unbalance remaining in each correction plane
(a) The rotor may be assembIed as a complete ma-
chine driven by its own power, and may there- relevant to each speed.
fore not be coupled to a prime mover; If requested by the customer the rotor maybe
(b)It may be advantageousto couple the rotor rigid- checked by a similar methodto that referred to in 8.3.
The check should be carried out for each balancing
ly to a prime moverin order to simulate site con-
speed.
ditions more closely;
(c) If the rotor is, for example, an induction motor,
it may be impossibleto measure vibration over a
speed range and only full speed readings can be
obtained; 8.7 Rotors Whose Final State of Unbalance is
Evaluated at Site
(d) Witha complete machine, it may not always be
8.7.1 Machines that have their balance quality evaluat-
possible to place vibration transducers at the
ed after final installation at site are subject to many
bearings. In these cases, the points where the vi-
disturbing factors that canproduce vibration. Someof
brations should be measured should be agreed
this vibration may be at fundamental frequency and
between the manufacturer and thecustomer;
can therefore be mistaken for unbalance. This is par-
(e) Ifthe stateof balance may be dependent on load, ticularly true in installations where two or more flexi-
the range of load over which the balance is as- ble rotors are coupled together.
sessed should be agreed between the manufactur-
Some of the factors that can produce such vibra-
er and the customer.
tions, together withsome of the precautions that
should be taken, are mentioned in Appendix B.
8.6 Rotors Whose Final State of Unbalance is It should be appreciatedthat in the final installation
Evaluated at High Speed as Unbalance at site, there may be many factors during commission-
ing that will conflict with the steady state conditions
Remaining in Specified Correction Planes
needed to assess the balance quality. It may be neces-
In some cases, facilities that permits rotors to be sary,however, to combine the balance quality runs
run at high speeds will be used to assess balance in with those for other purposes. If the preliminary run-
terms of vibration. However, in other cases, it may be ning of the installation shows the balance quality to be
desirable to specify unbalance remaining in specified in doubt, special runs may be arranged specifically for
correction planes. It should be appreciated that the the purpose of checking this point.
specification of the levels of balance to achieved must 8.7.2 In manyinstallations,forexamplewhere the
rely heavilyon experience of the ultimate performance prime mover is a “direct to line start” induction mo-
of similar rotors that have been balanced in a similar tor, it may be impossible to control the speed of rota-
ANSI S2.42-T982 19
I
tion during run up and stable conditions can only be 9 BALANCE QUALITY CRITERIA
achieved at full speed. Agreement should therefore be
reached between the manufacturer and the purchaser The balance quality for rigid rotors frequently
is Il
on the speed range overwhich the balance quality specified in terms of the displacement of the center of
should be checked. gravity from the axis of rotation as a function of,the ~
i==-.
The influencecoefficients arecomputedfromthe
expression:
-
(1) (11
a... .....a
12 lq
(1) (1)
a ........a whereis a complex quantity of dimensions(mass-
22 29 x length) which representsthe correction factor in the
.......... jth plane, its radius of attachement andits orientation
(1) (1) around the rotor.
a........a If more than the minimum data is acquired, then
n2 nq [A ] will not be a square matrix. In these circumstances,
(matrix of order
(2) (2) some of the excess data may be eliminated to form a
q X q for inversion). square matrix [A 1. More commonly, the additional
a.. ......a data are retained and a least-squares techniquesis used
12 lq
to obtain an optimum balance. A number of such opti-
........ mization procedures are available.
(2) (4
Details of the requiredbalance corrections are
a........a
found as follows:
n2 nq Generally,
..........
(ml (ml Cj = gj + ihj
a ........a = Cjexpiu,
n2 nq- where
G = (&+
The required balance corrections [C] are found by in- tan cj= hj/gj,
verting the (A ) matrix (which must be square, nonsin- is the magnitude of the required balance correction
gular, and for good results preferably well-condition- in the jth plane and lj is the angular position of
ed) as follows: from the angular reference location.
ANSI S2.42-1982 21
controlled. The effect of residual unbalance in a flexi- posed of small unbalances distributed along the
ble rotor which has been balanced in this way varies rotor;
with speed, due partially to the presence of initial un-
(b) the unbalance is distributed along the rotor in
balance not situated in the axial planes of the correc-
one radial direction. It should be noted that for
tions applied at low speed. The amount of initial ba-
any distribution this represents the most unfa-
lance which can be corrected in this way will depend
vorable condition for rotors operating at speeds
on the h a 1 unbalance limit.
below and not significantly approaching second
C.1.2 Preferably the maximumpermissiblebearing critical.
loads(due to unbalance)forany particular rotor
should be specified and compared with predictions of NOTE: The success of the method cannot be guaranteed for all
rotors but it should in general give satisfactory guidance.
the bearing loads which will arise at relevant speeds
due to (a)balance corrections being made at low speed
and (b) residualunbalance;i.e., the bearingloads
which arise when the rotor operates as a flexible rotor C.2 Calculation of Bearing Loads at Speeds
after it has only been balanced, to certain tolerances, Below First Critical Speed
as a rigid rotor. The calculation of the residual bearing
C.2.1 Nomenclature
loads will require the assumption of a typical initial
unbalance distribution. On this basis the acceptability Rotor mass
of low-speed balancing could be truly assessed. If cal- Initial unbalance mass eccentricity
culations show that the rotor is not sensitive to initial Maximum permissible residual unbalance mass
balance, then initial unbalance can beignored. It eccentricity (i-e., residual unbalanceat each end
should be noted that effects other than bearing loads, correction plane is 0.5 M e,)
for example bearing deflections,could be used. Rotor bending stiffness (at midspan)
Bearing stiffness (each bearing)
C.1.3At present it is difficultto make accurate predic-
Rotor speed
tions of this nature so that simpler approaches must be
Rotor first critical speed on its bearings
adopted. One such method of estimating the maxi-
d u l , i.e., rotor speed as a fraction of first criti-
mum permissible initial unbalance measured in a low-
cal speed
speed balancing machine is given in this appendix for
2h / k , i.e., ratio of total bearing stiffness to rotor
rotors which satisfy the following conditions:
stiffness
(a)single span rotor with end bearingsand two cor-
rection planes, one adjacent to each journal;
C.2.2 Calculation of Bearing Loads
(b) fairly symmetrical mass distribution about mid-
span with no overhangs; Consider a flexible shaft in flexible bearings with a
central mass having an initial eccentricity el as in Fig.
(c) fairly symmetrical flexibility distribution about Cl. This unbalance is corrected at end correction
midspan; planes with a residual unbalance in each correction
(d) continuous service speeds below and not signifi- plane of 0.5 Me, as shown in Fig. C2.
cantly approaching second critical speed. The bearing load at each bearing arising from the
unbalances shown in Fig. C2 at any speed U less than
C.1.4 It is further assumed that
w 1is given by:
(a) rotors which are built up by carefully controlled
assembly of pre-balancedcomponentswillin d2e1+(1+a-crR2)e,
0.5Mw2X
general have an initial unbalance that is com- (1 +a)(l-RZ)
.ANSI S2.42-1982 23
C.3.1 Principle For speeds above first critical speed, the method of
calculation is similar to C.2 and C.3 except that the
The basis of this method is the balancing recom- phase of e , relative to the shaft deflection is reversed
mendation of ANSI S2.19-1975Balance Quality of and the phase of e2 must be selectedto give the highest
Rotating Rigid Bodies are acceptable for rotors run- bearing load at the running speed concerned.
ning up to 80% of first critical speed. To determine the The resulting values of e,/e2 are plotted in Fig. C3.
maximum permissible initial unbalance for a particu-
lar flexible rotor, consider an equivalent “rigid” rotor
which is called the “datum” rotor and calculate the C.5 Balancing Procedure
bearing loads for the “datum” rotor at 80% of its first
critical speed when balanced to the required quality The recommended balancing procedure is as fol-
grade in accordance with ANSI S2.19-1975-Balance lows:
Quality of Rotating Rigid Bodies. The initial unbal-
ance rotating of the flexible rotor is then limited so (a) Estimate the ratio (a)of the total bearing stiff-
that the bearing loads of the rotor after balancing are ness to thestiffness of the rotor at midspan for a
no greater than those calculated for the “datum” ro- centrally applied load.
tor. (b) Estimate the ratio (A) of maximum operating
C.3.2 “Datum“ Rotor speed to first critical speed.
(c)Using these values, read off from Fig. C3 the ap-
The “datum” rotor is a rotor of the same mass, gen- propriate value of e1/e2.
eral dimensions, running speed, and quality grade as
the flexible rotor but with its shaft and bearing flexibi- (d)From Fig. 2 in ANSI S2.19-1975-Balance Qua-
lities adjusted so that the rotor stiffness is twice the lity of Rotating Rigid Bodies find the value of
stiffness of each bearing and the first critical speed is residual specific unbalance (e2)for the appropri-
1.25 times the service speed. Further, it is assumed ate operating speed and quality grade.
that an initial unbalance of ten times the maximum (e) Hence deduce the maximum permissible initial
permissible residual unbalance has been corrected at unbalance mass eccentricity (e,) and the maxi-
end correction planes and that themaximum permissi- mum permissible initial unbalance Me,.
bleresidual unbalance remains in the correction
planes. Such a rotor falls within the class of rigid ro- (r) Provided that, by design, planned assembly, ma-
tors covered by ANSI S2.19-1975-Balance Quality of chine control, and individual component balanc-
Rotating Rigid Bodies and should therefore run with ing it is possible to hold the initial unbalance in
safe bearing loads up to 80% of first critical speed. each correction plane to within 50% of the value
of Me, obtained in this way, then the rotor may
C.3.3 Estimation be balanced at low speed using the two correc-
tion planes near the journals.
For the datum rotor we have
a = 1,
NOTES:
A = 0.8,
(1) This analysis ignores dampingand therefore produces a situa-
e,/e, = 10, tion at the first critical speed whereno initial unbalancecan be toler-
ated. This is a theoretical condition and would notbe met in prac-
and each bearing load = 5.38 Mw2e,. tice. It should be appreciated thatthe calculations are related to the
Thus to keep the bearing load (as given in C.2.2) of condition atthe running speed andin no way guarantee that thero-
tor will be capable of passing through the critical speed without ex-
any flexible rotor within this limit we require: cessive vibration.
E, 9.76(1-A2)(1 +a)- A 2 (2) This method has been simplified by putting the residual un-
-G balance tolerance fór the flexible rotor equalto that derived for the
€2 aA “datum”rigidrotorfoundfrom Fig. 2 in ANSI S2.19-Balance
This relationship is plotted in Fig. C3. Quality of Rotating Rigid Bodies.
a = 0.2
40
/
30
e1
-
e2
20
10
ANSI S2.42-1982 25
APPENDIX D: A METHOD OF created by the three unbalance corrections U,, U,, and
COMPUTATION OF UNBALANCE U, about a given point on the rotor must equal those
caused by the initial unbalancesU, and U,, about the
[This Appendix isfor information only isnot part of American Na-
tional Standard S2.42-1982, Procedures for Balancing Flexible Ro- - same
point. . .
NOTE All the unbalances defined above are vector quantities central correction
H=
fixed in the rotor and a and b in u(z)are also vectors. initial static unbalance
(2)= A + B ( d l )+ C sin(nz/Z ),
where A , B, and C are constants depending on the
bearing and shaft stiffnesses. Also define the system
constant:
NOTES
NOTES 29
The Standards Program of the AcousticalSociety of America is the responsibility of the ASA's Committee on
Standards (ASACOS)and is executed by ASA's Standards Secretariat headed by its Standards Manager.
The Acoustical Society of America is the Secretariat for four standards committees of the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI); S1 on Acoustics, S2 on MechanicalShock and Vibration,S3 on Bioacoustics, and S12
on Noise; and provides the UnitedStates input to ISO/TC43 on Acoustics, for which S1 and S3 serve as the
technical advisory groups. ASA also administers the international secretariat of ISO/TC 108 on Mechanical
Vibration and Shock(on behalf of theAmerican National Standards Institute) andprovides theU.S. input via the
technical advisory groupfor ISO/TC 108, which is Standards Committee S2.
Standards are produced in four broad areas: physical acoustics, mechanical shock and vibration, bioacoustics,
and noise, and arereaffirmedor revised everyfive years. The latest
information on current ANSI standardsas well
as those under preparation is available from the Standards Secretariat.
When ordering ANSI S2.42-1982, please also use ASA Catalog No. 46-1982 for easy reference. This
standard and otherstandards listed in the ASA Standards Catalog maybe ordered from the following
address:
If you wishto have further informationon the Standards Publication Program of theAcoustical Societyof Amer-
ica, address your inquiries to
Standards Manager
Standards Secretariat
Acoustical Society of America
335 East 45th Street
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 661-9404
Officers 1982-1983 Members of the Executive Council Members of the Technical Council
David T. Blackstock, President David M. Green David Lubman
Applied ResearchLaboratories . Laboratory of Psychophysics Architectural Acoustics
University of Texas Harvard University Hughes Aircraft
P.O. Box 8029 Cambridge, Massachusetts 021 38 Ground Systems Group
Austin, Texas 7871 2 Bldg. 618, MS P415
Katherine S. Harris Fullerton, california 92634
Frederick H. Fisher, President-Elect Department of Speech and
Marine Physical Laboratory, P-O01 Hearing Sciences Mauro Pierucci
Scripps Institution of Oceanography City University of New York I
Engineering Acoustics
University of California,San Diego Graduate Center Dept. of Aero. and Engrg. Mechanics
La Jolla, California 92093 33 West 42 Street San Diego State University
New York, New York 10036 San Diego, California 921 82
Alan Powell, Vice President
David W. Taylor Naval Ship George C. Maling, Ir. William M. Hartmann
R&D Center IBM Corp., Acoustics Laboratory Musical Acoustics
Bethesda, Maryland 20084 a p t . C18, Bldg. 704 Physics Dept.
P. O.Box 390 Michigan State University
William J. Galloway, Vice President- Poughkeepsie, New York 12602 East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Elect Larry H. Royster
Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Herman Medwin
2 1 120 Vanowen Street Department of Physics Noise
Canoga Park, California 91 303 U.S. Naval Postgraduate School 1217 BR Hall
Monterey, California 93940 MAE Department
Robert T. Beyer, Treasurer North Carolina State University
Department of Physics Lawrence R. Rabiner Raleigh, North Carolina 27650
Brown University Room 20-533
. Providence, Rhode Island 0291 2 Bell Laboratories
Murray Hill, New Jersey07974
Walter G.Mayer
Physical Acoustics
R. Bruce Lindsay, Editor-in-Chief Dept. of Physics
Department of Physics Juergen Tonndorf Georgetown University
Brown University College of Physicians and Surgeons Washington, D. C. 20057
Providence, Rhode Island0291 2 Columbia Universitv
630 West 168 Stre& Joseph E. Hind
William J..Galloway, Standards Director New York, New York 10032 Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Dept. of Neurophysiology
1 2 120 Vanowen Street JozefJ. Zwislocki Univ. of Wisconsin Medical School
Canoga
Park, California 91 303 Institute
for Sensory
Research 1300 University Avenue
Syracuse University Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Betty H. Goodfriend, Merrill Lane
Administrative Secretary Syracuse,. New York 13210 Wayne T. Reader
Acoustical Societyof America Shock and Whation
335 East 45 Street David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center
New York, New York 1O017 Bethesda, Maryland 20084
Telephone: (21 2)661 -9404 Edward P. Neuburg
Speech Communication
National Security Agency(R51
Fort Meade, Maryland 20755
William A. Kuperman
Underwater Acoustics
Naval Ocean R&D Activity
NSTL Station, Mississippi 39529.