Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dr. Krupar
10/27/19
Introduction
This report analyzes the roster of Burnley F.C. within the FIFA 2017 player dataset, which
contains over 50 metrics on each player, to identify positions in the team’s starting lineup that
could potentially be improved by signing a player from another club. This analysis is important
as Burnley has been promoted into the highest division of soccer in England, the Premier
League, after winning the championship of the lower English Football League. As a result, they
will face significantly stronger competition. Along with tougher opponents, the EPL will also bring
increased revenue into the organization (Conn, 2018). Although signing better players is
expected to increase the club’s payroll costs, the increase in revenue due to league-wide
After initially viewing Burnley’s roster in the FIFA dataset, the following problem statement
o The level of talent required of Burnley to achieve promotion from the English Football
The practical theory will be tested by assessing the relative talent on Burnley’s roster
against those of the five clubs most likely to be competing with Burnley to remain in the EPL by
o The other two clubs who were promoted from the EFL to the EPL; and
o The three lowest clubs in the prior year’s EPL standings who avoided relegation
For each position group in the starting lineup, a metrics table will be created to compare the
talent level as measured by each club’s average player rating for each skill identified as critical
for that position. Here is a basic example of what a metric table might look like.
These metrics tables will provide the basis for assessing whether there was a talent disparity.
With those tables, we may identify individual position groups where the club should target
improvement.
In order to identify potential replacement players for Burnley at each position, further
o Talent Improvement
o Cost Management – For the purposes of this assignment, the cost to sign a
player will be assumed to be relative to the players overall rating. The assumed
value of each marginal point for the overall rating will be 1,000,000 euros.
o Identify positions on Burnley’s roster where their talent level is below the level of
the teams against whom they will be competing to avoid relegation; and
o Identify players with a similar overall rating (and therefore similar cost) but with
The in-depth analysis of Burnley’s starting roster within the FIFA 17 player dataset is
Recommendations
Conclusion
There are a few strengths in these recommendations. They project to improve the team’s
positional talent, and how the individual player fits into each position in the starting lineup, with
minimal increase in costs. By executing these recommendations, Burnley’s starting roster would
be able to play better as a team in their roles. With the starting roster playing better as a team,
the club will be well positioned to be competitive in and avoid relegation from the English
Premier League.
With these recommendations, a weakness would be that the club’s payroll costs are projected
to increase, albeit marginally, by 2.2%. In addition, one could argue that the FIFA 17 player
Burnley’s organizational structure and capabilities should not have an impact on these strengths
and weaknesses. Considering that EA has a global team of over 6,400 employees and
actual skill levels (Murphy, 2019), it is a reasonable assumption that the dataset could be
analyzed to make recommendations based on player personnel in real-life. With increased EPL
revenue sharing, Burnley should be able to handle a projected 2.2% increase in roster costs
(Conn, 2018).
References
Conn, D. (2018, June 7). Championship clubs feel the strain as financial gap to Premier League
financial-gap-premier-league-annual-accounts.
Murphy, R. (2019, September 12). FIFA player ratings explained: How are the card number &
how-are-the-card-number-stats/1hszd2fgr7wgf1n2b2yjdpgynu
Appendix 1: Initial Starting Lineup Comparison by Position
Appendix 2: Before and After Effect of Recommendations
Recommendation 1:
Recommendation 2:
Recommendation 3:
Recommendation 4:
Recommendation 4:
Appendix 3.1: Identifying Potential Replacements for ST
Sc