Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
12-HUMSS
Goldie Arradaza
Aljon Mondejo
John Mark Ortega
Marfy Amilao
FEBRUARY 2020
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Garbage is one of the major problems inside the campus and all other
schools. As per observation, the cause of this problem is the irresponsibility of
the students which is the act of littering. A school will not be conducive for
learning if it is dirty so it should be always clean to maintain the cleanliness but
what really happen is that students are acting irresponsibility in the proper
disposal.
Improper waste disposal is one of the problem has been going on for
years and many things have been done to solve this but wasn’t able to fully
achieve it. They say what you do reflects what you are and having a dirty school
environment tells others we don’t care for our school. The waste we throw not
only affects us but our planet too and pollution is one of the effects of this
problem.
The project has been putted into action to train the Lyceans into becoming
more disciplined and sensitive individuals not only to the Mother Nature but also
to the environment of the community where they belong.
The implementation of the project has been very successful since the first
day of classes and is still doing well until today. The Lyceans are taking their part
in cooperating for the new policy of the university’s cafeteria. Students can be
seen cleaning their own plates and utensils at the table after they finished eating.
2
Most of the people who eat at the cafeteria agreed that CLAYGO is a
good development for the university, pointing that since they were the ones using
it, they should also be the ones responsible in cleaning it.
3
THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This campaign dictates the use of minimal plastic, bringing back the old
habit of using reusable bags and properly separated bio-degradable or non-
biodegradable items as per their orientation, subcategories are also imposed
such as plastics, glass, metal and many more to be able to make recycling
methods handy.
4
Members of our local academic community also encourage students to
help maintain cleanliness by promoting awareness and organizing campaigns
such as CLAYGO or no littering information drives. In reference to De La Salle
University, they have coordinated the rules and campaign strategies with the
University Students Government Organization and discipline office to help
motivate students to have the initiative to clear table after every meal.
5
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Sex:
__ Male
__ Female
Age:
Section
__Diamond
__Feldspar
__Garnett
__Hiddenite
__Indicolite
__Jasper
6
SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Habit. This refers to a settled or regular tendency or practice, especially one the
hard to give up.
Littering. This refers to the unlawful deposit of any type of waste material that is
less than 200 liters in volume and penalties apply.
Policy. This refers to a set of ideas or plans or that is used as a basis for making
decisions, especially in politics, economics or business.
Segregation. This refers to a system that kept different groups separate from
each other, either through physical dividers or using social pressures and laws
7
Conservation. This refers to prevention of wasteful use of resources the
government must take action
Resources. This refers to a stock or supply of money, materials, staff and other
assets that can be drawn on by a person or organization in order to function
effectively
Health. This refers to the state of being free from illness or injury
Practice. this refers to the actual application or use of an idea, belief, or method
as opposed to theories relating to it
Garbage. This refers to a wasted or spoiled food and other refine, as form a
kitchen or household
Disposal. This refers to the action or process of throwing away or getting rid of
something
8
Pollution. This refers to the presence or in introduction into the environment of a
substance or thing that has harmful or poisonous effects
Community. This refers to a group of people living in the same place or having a
particular characteristic in common
Waste disposal. This refers to removing and destroying damaged, used or other
unwanted domestic, agricultural or industrial products and substance
9
CHAPTER II
This chapter presents a review of related literature both foreign and local.
This also presents the different variables relative to the study.
FOREIGN LITERATURE
10
kept adequate portable storage containers of approved size, deposit or cause to
be deposited all garbage, rubbish and waste in said storage containers.
LOCAL LITERATURE
11
disobedience of the students (Abigail Manzano, 2014). Waste generation and
storage in Agricultural sources mainly consists of spoiled food grains and
vegetables, agricultural remains, litter, etc., generated from fields, farms and
granaries.
The current status of SWM in Cebu City are as follows: collects not lower
350 tons of garbage every day, implementation of “No Segregation, No
Collection” Policy but lack of enforcement in segregating in most barangays
(DOST, 2006). Moreover, there is an inefficient coordination and linkage between
the city and the barangays. Poor maintenance of equipment’s, garbage trucks
that are not suitable for segregating wastes into different compartments
according to their kind, and wastes collectors that are not diligently following
collection schedule are present.
12
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter views the methodology of the study and contains the detailed
discussion of the following parts; The research design, research locale, sampling
design, respondents of the study, research instrument and data gathering
procedures.
RESEARCH DESIGN
SAMPLING DESIGN
The researchers will be going to study 5 respondents per section from Grade
7-Amethyst to Grade 7-Jasper at Lumbia National High School. There are 543
students as the total population of Grade 7 in LNHS. The researchers deemed
the retrieval of survey questionnaires and conduct of interview manageable
within a week and will consider only 50 students as the respondents of the study.
13
Table 1. List of Grade sections and its population
Section Name Number of No. of
Population Respondents
7 – Amethyst 54 5
7 – Bloodstone 56 5
7 – Carnelian 56 5
7 – Diamond 58 5
7 – Emerald 56 5
7 – Feldspar 54 5
7 – Garnet 50 5
7 – Hiddenite 53 5
7 – Indicolite 54 5
7 – Jasper 52 5
543 50
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
14
questionnaire consists of 15 questions relevant to the topic. It was distributed
among the selected students.
The researcher will use a survey to get all the data for this research. The
questionnaires used are related to the problems stated. This survey type is a
checklist type wherein the respondents put a check on the survey questionnaire.
DATA PROCESSING
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
1) The profile of the respondents was determined the descriptive statistical value of
its mean, percentages, and standard deviations was employed in order to
describe the variables in this study.
2) The learner’s perceptions of the effectiveness of CLAYGO Campaign were
determined through the standard deviation. A percentage calculation was used to
determine the significant difference on learners’ perception on CLAYGO
Campaign when conducting a research. The researchers divided the whole
population in every section of Grade 7 to determine the exact percentage of the
respondents that doing proper wasted disposal.
15
CHAPTER IV
There are 543 students as the total population of Grade-7 from Amethyst
to Jasper of Lumbia National High School and out of the total population, the
researchers only selected 50 respondents through random sampling.
16
to my school?
TOTAL 36.7 73.5% 13.2 26.5%
98% of the respondents answered yes to the question “Do you take care
of the school cleanliness?”. This proves that the respondents know themselves
that they are taking part of the school cleanliness however 82% of the
respondents answered that CLAYGO is not really effective in the school. This
means that a lot of Grade 7 students of Lumbia National High School didn’t know
about CLAYGO.
17
CHAPTER V
This chapter presents the summary of the research work undertaken, the
conclusions drawn and the recommendations made as an outgrowth of this
study.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
This study was conducted for the purpose of determining the effectiveness
of CLAYGO Campaign to the Grade-7 students of Lumbia National High School.
The descriptive method is used of research was utilized and the nominative
survey technique was used for gathering data. The survey questionnaire served
as an instrument for collecting data. 19 percent of the total number of population
were representative students of the Grade-7 level as the respondents. This study
was conducted during the school year 2019-2020.
CONCLUSION
After gathering all the data from the survey and computed it, the researchers
conclude that:
56% students of grade-7 were not taking part of the school cleanliness;
CLAYGO was implemented yet it was not really effective and the students
also were not participating on it;
18
Only the environmental organizations in the school does taking part of
CLAYGO;
Students were taught by the teachers and organizations about waste
segregation and its effect yet the students are not applying it because the
information’s taught weren’t enough for the students to practice it.
RECOMMENDATION
For this problem to be solve, there should be a proper disposal bin called
CLAYGO trash bin. In this trash bin, plastic/paper cups have their own bin
wherein the plastic/paper cups will be just being stack on the bin. The
biodegradable, non-biodegradable and special waste would also be
separated in one bin;
The organizations must strengthen the effectiveness of CLAYGO by
putting placards and CLAYGO trash bins in every building. Also, they
should conduct a symposium wherein it discusses the different types of
waste and its proper segregation that enables the students to have
knowledge again about this topic. This will help to lessen the garbage and
dispose it properly.
19
REFERENCES
Harra, & Goel. (2009). Waste generation and waste in Kolkata, India. Retrieved
from
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
Wagner, & Arnold. (2006). public awareness and management. Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
February 20,2019
20
Cascadia Consulting Group. (2006). Waste Generation and Storage of Waste in
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/SolidWasteManagementOrdinance.pdf,
21
City, Philippines. Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/2015Village
APPENDIX A
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
QUESTIONS YES NO
1. Do you take care of the school cleanliness
2. Does the cleanliness in school have impact to the
students health?
3. After eating in the canteen, do you dispose your
garbage?
4. Do all students take part in the cleanliness?
5. Do you know about CLAYGO campaign?
6. Is CLAYGO campaign implemented in school?
7. Is CLAYGO campaign effective in the school?
8. Does your school have an environmental
group/club?
9. Does these organizations take part of the
CLAYGO campaign?
10. Does your school have waste reduction program
already in place?
11. Do all students know how to dispose waste
properly?
12. Are this causes on environmental taught at your
school?
22
13. Does your school have reuse program already in
place?
14. Do you know about segregation of waste?
15. Waste segregation is beneficial to my school?
PART I: DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
GENDER: SECTION:
PART II:
APPENDIX B
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS
NUMBER OF QUESTIONS
23
98% or 49 of the total respondents in the Q1 answered yes so this means
that the students are taking care of the schools’ cleanliness however they
really don’t know how to segregate and dispose it properly which leads to
88% or 44 of the total respondents who answered no to the Q11.
In the Q7, 41 of the total respondents says that CLAYGO campaign is not
effective in the school which results to 82%. This means that CLAYGO is
not really effective in this grade level.
24