www.brill.com/scri
Abstract
The Russian antiquarian and explorer of the Orthodox East Petr Ivanovich Sevast’anov
was one of the first to take photos of the architectural monuments, art treasures and
manuscripts of Mount Athos. During the 1850s he organized several expeditions. In
1856, Sevast’anov studied photography in Paris at the atelier of Belloc and bought the
materials and equipment needed. In March of 1857, he arrived at Athos and started his
work in St. Andrew’s Skete. With the assistance of the librarian of St. Panteleimon’s
Monastery Azarii, Sevast’anov got access to many Greek and Slavonic manuscripts. In
October of 1857, he returned to Paris and presented the results of his work in a photo
exhibition, followed by a public lecture at the Academy on February 5, 1858. The recently
discovered two large format cartons of Sevast’anov’s photos at the French Photographic
Society, along with the correspondence preserved in his archives, are an important con-
tribution to the history of Byzantine Studies.
Keywords
Mount Athos – photography – Byzantine art – Greek and Slavonic manuscripts – icons
– French Photographic Society – history of Byzantine studies
The history of Russian byzantology has been a subject of many research works
during the last three decades. Nevertheless, still many gaps can be found. Very
little is known about the work of the Russian scholars during their stay abroad.
This is also the case of Petr Sevast’anov, the famous collector, explorer of Mount
Scrinium
© Lora (2020)
Gerd, 1-19 | 10.1163/8177565-00160A20
2020 | doi:10.1163/8177565-00160A20 Downloaded from Brill.com06/04/2020 12:46:04PM
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License. via free access
2 Gerd
Athos and photographer of the mid-19th century. Two unknown large format
(70×89 and 70×85 cm) cartons with Sevast’anov’s colloid process photos of ob-
jects from Athos were recently found in the French Society of Photography
(S.F.P.) in Paris. The cartons (dated 1857) contain 19 (11+8) photos of Slavonic
and Greek manuscripts, acts, icons and items of applied art. The article aims at
answering the following questions: 1) what was the place of these cartons in
Sevast’anov’s research on Mount Athos 2) what were the reasons and circum-
stances of preparing these materials in Paris at that time.
The origins of photography in France bring us to August 19, 1839, when the
invention of Louis Jacques Daguerre was first presented to the public at the
Institut de France. The new discovery was highly estimated for the progress of
arts and science.1 In 1839, three main techniques were dominant: the daguerre-
otype, the photogenic sketch of Talbot and the direct positive of Bayard. In
January 1841, Talbot announced another method, called calotype, which per-
mitted to produce a negative (a latent picture).2 For some time it could not
however replace the daguerreotype, because it required more time, precise
work and was more expensive, so its destiny was to become a method of the
“belle image” in the cabinets of curiosities. Promoting his invention, Talbot
3 The Pencil of Nature, London, 1844-1846, 2nd ed. N. Y., 1989; Sun Pictures of Scotland (1845);
Annals of the Artists of Spain (1848).
4 Michel Frizot, Nouvelle histoire de la Photographie, pp. 64-65.
5 L. Blanquart-Evrard, «Procédés employés pour obtenir les épreuves de photographie sur pa-
pier», in : Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences, 27 janvier 1847 ; Id., Manuel de photog-
raphie sur papier, Paris, 1851; G. Le Gray, Traité pratique de photographie sur papier et sur verre,
Paris, 1850 ; other editions : 1851, 1852, 1854.
Abel Niépce de Saint-Victor, introduced the usage of a glass for the albumin
procedure: this method was included in later manuals. On November 15, 1854,
the French Photographic Society was created; its first president was Victor Reg-
nault, member of the Academy of Sciences and Director of the Sèvres manu-
facture. The Society started editing a journal (Bulletin de la Société Française
de Photographie, furtherafter F.S.P.), which, along with “La Lumière”, became a
platform for publications. The Society also started exhibitions (the first one in
1855). Finally, the usage of liquid collodion since the mid-1850s brought a new
wave of expositions with the participation of famous maîtres of the time, such
as Charles Nègre and Gustave Le Gray. The end of the 1850s, with the work of
famous ateliers in Paris, the epoch of Napoleon III was the right time for this
fast flowering of photography.
Following in the steps of Napoleon’s expeditions to Egypt, many romanti-
cally minded archaeologists and travelers headed there. Talbot himself was
an Egyptologist, and after his invention of calotype, a number of French (Du
Camp, Teynard, Salzmann) and British (Bridges, Wheelhouse, Smith, Graham)
specialists worked on the banks of the Nile, collaborating with the profession-
als already installed there (such as Antonio Beato and Adrien Bonfils), as well
as with archaeologists. The depiction of the antiquities of Italy had been a
subject of special attention already since the early 1840s. In the mid-1840s
attention turned to Greece. Archaeology became one of the main outlets of
photography, providing both precise depiction of objects and a completely dif-
ferent means for research.6
Russia did not ignore the newfound interest in the exploration of the Mid-
dle East. Its perception of history had, however, some peculiarities. Unlike
France and Britain, Russia had a deep historical connection with the Christian
East. This tradition was revived during the romanticism of the 19th century,
and especially following the Crimean War, when high society, including mem-
bers of the Royal Family, showed a strong interest in discovering the history of
the Orthodox East. The political interests, given the bounds of the Eastern
question, combined with messianic ideas and a scientific approach, formed
this aspiration in Russian society, which brought about the rapid development
of research in the field of Christian art and archaeology. The interest in study-
ing Byzantine and Old Russian, art as well as searching for ways of its possible
implementation in church construction in the mid-19th century, led to the for-
mation of the “Russian-Byzantine” style in Russian architecture and painting.
This line of scholarship, combining both Eastern and West European tenden-
cies, found strong support among members of the Royal Family, and especially
among the President of the Academy of Arts, Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaev-
na, and the Vice-President, Grigorii Gagarin. An icon painting department was
created at the Academy in 1856, and, starting in 1857, Gagarin specially cared
about the copying of byzantine miniatures from the manuscripts of the Paris
National Library.7 A project of delegating young Russian students to the Greek
lands for studying the best examples of Byzantine painting was considered at
the end of the 1850s by Antonin Kapustin, a priest at the Russian church in
Athens.8
The idea of systematically studying the artifacts and wall paintings of Mount
Athos was first proposed by the traveler and church politician Andrei Murav’ev
in 1850. In a note addressed to the Holy Synod, he proposed to delegate a team
of artists for making copies from frescos that might well soon disappear.9 In
May of 1852, the Ober-Procurator of the Holy Synod, Count Nikolai Protasov,
presented another note with similar content, but the Crimean War made the
realization of the plan impossible. Following the war in 1857, the new Ober-
Procurator of the Synod, Alexander Tolstoi, came back to the project of an ex-
pedition to Mount Athos, proposing the participation of the Synod in its
financing and the inclusion of two students from the Theological Academy.
The interest of the Synod coincided with that of the Academy of Arts, and
its President, the Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna. Surely the special atten-
tion paid to these projects was related to the general direction of searching
for a new Middle East policy and new possibilities for exploration in the
Orient, c arried out by her brother, the Grand Duke Konstantin Nikolaevich.
First Archimandrite Porfirii Uspenskii was supposed to lead the expedition,
but later another, more suitable candidate was proposed – Petr Ivanovich
Sevast’anov – who was considered more experienced in the new technical
methods.
10 Levitskii, as well as another owner of a photo atelier in Petersburg in the 1850s, Alexander
Shpakovskii, had studied photography in Paris. See also: N. Iu. Avetian, “Фотографиче
ская деятельность капитана А.И. Шпаковского” [Photographic Activities of Captain
A.I. Shpakovskii], Труды Государственного Эрмитажа, vol. 91. Pamiati G.N. Koshelevoi
[In memoriam of G.N. Kosheleva] (Conference proceedings, December 19-21, 2016), St.
Petersburg, 2018, pp. 300-312; I.O. Terent’eva, “К истории развития фоторепродукции
во второй половине XIX века (по материалам собрания отдела истории русской
культуры Государственного Эрмитажа” [Toward the History of the development of
Photographic reproduction in the Second Half of the 19th Century (using materials from
the Russian Culture Department collection at the State Hermitage], Ibidem, pp. 312-321;
Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Photography, ed. John Hannavy, N. Y.--London, 2007,
vol. 2, pp. 853-855. The first Russian manuals of practical photography are also dated to
the 1850s: A. Ianysh, Фотография на стекле с коллодионом, альбумином, стереоскоп,
стереоскопические изображения на бумаге и стекле и фотографический процесс на
бумаге [Photography on Glass with Collodion, Dry Collodion, Stereoskope, Stereoscopic
Images on Paper and Glass and the Photographic Process on Paper], St. Petersburg, 1858.
11 Auguste Belloc (1800-1867) worked in daguerrotypes, stereoscopic images and collodion.
He was among the first who took care of popularizing photography, gave lessons and
wrote manuals. He made a series of stereoscopic pictures of nude models, and was even
prosecuted by the police. Author of the manuals: Catéchisme de l’opérateur photographe,
Paris, 1857; Les quattre branches de la photographie,1855, 1858; Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-
Century Photography, vol. I, p. 146 ; François Boisjoly, Répertoire des photographes pari
siens du XIX e siècle, Paris, 2009, p. 36.
12 Antonin Kapustin, the superior of the Russian church in Athens, was among the pioneers
of photography in Greece. Antonin started by taking portraits of the clerics of his church,
something completely unknown in the history of Greek photography, as well as views of
the antiquities of Athens. During the 1850s, there were several attempts to make photo
graphic albums of Athens and Greece. Along with foreigners (such as James Robertson in
1854), local photographers Petros Moraites and Philipos Margaritis had been practicing
since the end of the 1840s, and Dimitrios Konstantinou – since 1858. In 1856, Antonin took
his first lessons in calotype from Margaritis, in 1858 Konstantinou trained him in collodion
process. In July of 1859, Petr Sevast’anov arrived in Athens and spent a few days working
in the byzantine Daphni monastery. Here, using dry collodion process, the two of them
took pictures from the mosaics of the dome of the catholicon. In August of 1859 Antonin
joined Sevast’anov’s expedition to Mount Athos. See: K. Vach, “Из истории русско свето
писи: Архимандрит Антонин и его фотографические опыты в Греции (1856-1860
гг.)” [From the History of Russian svetopis’: Archimandrite Antonin and His Photographic
Experience in Greece], Православный Палестинский сборник, 115 (2018), p. 61-100. On
the photography in Greece and Constantinople in the 1850s see: G. Edwards,
A.X. Xanthankis et alii, Athens 1839-1900, a Photographic Record, Athens, 1985; Bahhatin
Öztuncay, James Robertson, Pioneer of Photography in the Ottoman Empire, Istanbul, 1992
The result of this expedition was more than impressive: during a 14 month
stay on Mt. Athos, about 300 traces of frescoes, icons, and sewing works were
made, 1000 colored traces of miniatures and initials in manuscripts, 350 pho-
tographs of manuscripts and acts of monasteries, 150 architecture sketches, as
well as plans of the monasteries and their surroundings. Apart from making
copies, Sevast’anov gathered his own collection of icons, fragments of wall-
paintings, manuscripts and items of applied arts. In October of 1860, the mate-
rials were transported via Constantinople to St. Petersburg, and in December
Sevast’anov returned to Russia himself. The objects (both original ones and
copies, including photographs) were demonstrated in March of 1861 in the
Winter Palace in St. Petersburg and made a big impression on the Russian edu-
cated society.13
After a long and complicated history of rivalry between different institu-
tions and Sevast’anov himself, his collection was dispersed. The icons and their
copies are today preserved in the State Hermitage Museum and the Russian
Museum in St. Petersburg, and in the Tretyakov Gallery, the A.S. Pushkin Mu-
seum and the State Historical Museum in Moscow. The photographs of manu-
scripts are stored in the National Library of Russia, while the archive materials
are in the Russian State Library in Moscow.14
13 The fate of Sevast’anov’s collection, as well as the process of organization the expe
dition of 1859-60 are described in: G.I. Dovgallo, “Собирательская деятельность
П.И. Севастьянова (по материалам его личного архива)” [The Collectors’ Activities of
P.I. Sevast’anov (Based on Materials from his Personal Archives)], in: Древнерусское
искусство. Балканы. Русь [Old Russian Art. The Balkans. Rus’], St. Petersburg, 1995,
pp. 242-256; Iu. Pyatnitskii, “И дым Отечества нам сладок и приятен” [“The Smoke of
the Motherland is Sweet and Pleasant for Us”], Наше наследие [Our Heritage], 111 (2014);
112 (2015); N.P. Pivovarova, “Еще раз об афонских экспедициях П.И. Севастьянова”
[Once More about the Athos Expeditions of P.I. Sevast’anov], in: Spicilegium Byzantino-
Rossicum. Сборник статей к 80-летию члена-корреспондента РАН И. П. Медведева,
ed. L.A. Gerd, Moscow, 2015, pp. 231-236; L.A. Gerd, K.A. Vach, “Переписка архимандрита
Антонина (Капу стина) и П.И. Севастьянова. 1858-1862” [The Correspondence of
Archimandrite Antonin (Kapustin) and P.I. Sevast’anov], Православный Палестинский
сборник 114 (2017), pp. 64-113; O.L. Solomina, “Афонская экспедиция 1859-1860 гг. в
документах и письмах ее участников” [The Athos Expedition of 1859-1860 in the Docu
ments and Letters of its Participants], Православный Палестинский сборник 115 (2018),
pp. 249-280 .
14 Искусство Византии в собраниях СССР. Каталог выставки [Byzantine Art in the
Collections of the USSR. Catalog of the Exhibition], vol. 3, Moscow, 1977, No. 955, 957; Athos.
Monastic Life on the Holy Mountain (Exhibition Catalog), Helsinki City Art Museum, Art
Museum Tennis Palace. Maahenki, 2006, pp. 167, 169, 172, 177-178, 197-198, 259, 262-264;
I.L. Kyzlasova, «Новое о коллекции П.И. Севастьянова» [New Data about the Collection
of P.I. Sevast’anov], Вопросы славяно-русской палеографии, кодикологии, эпиграфики
[Questions of Slavo-Russian Paleography, Codicology and Epigraphics], Moscow, 1987,
As many other Russians of his time, Sevast’anov received his training in pho-
tography in Paris, the cultural center of the 19th century. It was in Paris where
he took his first lessons in 1856; it was there that he bought the equipment for
all of his expeditions; it was there that he first demonstrated the results of his
work on Athos. After leaving Athos in October of 1857, Sevast’anov returned to
Paris and demonstrated the photographs of the treasures he had discovered in
the Photographic Society. At the same time, he donated a number of his pho-
tographs to the French Photographic Society.15 This event was immediately
reflected in the popular photographic journal, Le Lumière.16 On February 5,
1858, Sevast’anov pronounced a lecture in the Académie des Inscriptions et
Belles-Lettres.17 On arriving in Paris in the second half of the 1850s, Sevast’anov
found himself in the atmosphere of the flourishing luxury of the Second Em-
pire, full of desire for arts, both traditional, and forward-looking to new inven-
tions and industrial progress. The leading photo ateliers of the French capital,
those of Nadar, Disdéri and others, though struggling in competition among
themselves, found fertile soil for their development.18
Among the representatives of the Russian diaspora in Paris we find several
photographers, members of the French Photographic Society. The first of them
was “the father of Russian photography”, Sergey Levitskii (1819-1898). Levitskii
first arrived in Paris in 1845-48, where he met Daguerre, studied the art of pho-
tography and received a golden medal for his large format daguerreotypes. In
1858, he again installed in Paris, where he opened a studio, making photo-
graphic portraits of the aristocracy. Upon returning to Russia in 1866, he was
the only one who took pictures of the Tsar’s family.19 Sevast’anov might have
known Levitskii from St. Petersburg, and surely met him in Paris as well.
Photographic methods were required by the Russian authorities for discov-
ering the newly joined regions of the Russian Empire. It was in the Caucasus
Mineral Waters near Piatigorsk, where Levitskii made his first photographs. In
the 1850s, the Governor of the Caucasus, A. I Bariatinskii, delegated the engi-
neer A.B. Ivanitskii to Paris to study photography. In Paris he became a mem-
ber of the French Photographic Society, and Sevast’anov might have met him
there as well.20
Many of the Russian aristocratic diaspora were enthusiastic about the new
art of photography. Among them was Gabrièl Riumin (1841-1870), a young no-
bleman born in Lausanne, who was a member of the French photographic so-
ciety since 1857. In June 1858, he took part in the discussions of the F.S.P. on
using dry collodion paper, as proposed by Henri Corbin.21 In September 1858,
Riumin made a report about making carbon prints.22 In 1857, he accompanied
Grand Duke Constantine Nikolaevich on his journey to the Near East and took
photographs of Pompei, Maples, Sicily, Athens and Jerusalem. Part of the prints
were demonstrated in the FSP in 1859 and donated to the Society.23 In 1859-
1860 he edited a newspaper called Gazette du Nord, where he printed part of
the description of the journey of the Grand Duke; along with the newspaper
he proposed to subscribers an album with 10 photographs of views taken
during the journey. At the same time, he opened a photography studio at
Villedo street No. 10.24 In his letter to Sevast’anov from Palermo (January 1857),
Riumin discussed a future expedition to Mount Athos, and expressed his (neg-
ative) opinion on the candidature of August Leborgne, the future companion
of Sevast’anov’s expedition.25
The success of Sevast’anov’s exposition and lecture was prepared by both
the general interest of French society in the Orient and by the already existing
knowledge of Mount Athos from the previous years. In the 1850s interest in
Eastern Christianity began growing in Western Europe, though it still could not
rival that in classical antiquities. By the mid-1850s, Athos was visited by some
French travelers and explorers; first among them was Adolphe Didron, who
had a strong interest in Byzantine art and wrote an essay on Christian icon
painting;26 it was he who paid special attention to Sevast’anov’s presentations
in Paris.27 The vice president of the Russian Imperial Academy of Arts, Grigorii
Gagarin, (by the way, a photographer himself) spent some time in Paris (since
June of 1857), organizing the copying of the best examples of art. A devotee of
the study of Byzantine art, he strongly promoted the byzantine style of
26 Adolphe Napoléon Didron (1806-1867), famous French journalist and archeologist. Sec
retary of the committee for historical studies at the Ministry of Culture, professor of
archeology at the Imperial Library. Founder (1844) and director of the journal Annales
archéologiques. Author of: Iconographie chrétienne : Histoire de Dieu, (1844) and first editor
of the Mount Athos manuscript of Dionisii of Fourna: Manuel d’iconographie chrétienne
grecque et latine avec une introduction et des notes par M. Didron, traduit du manuscrit
byzantin «Le Guide de la Peinture» (1845).
27 In November 1862, Sevast’anov invited Didron to his hotel in Paris to showed him per
sonally his “Athos treasures”. A. Didron–P. Sevast’anov, November 14, 1862. RGB, fund
269/1, carton 13, d. 82.
architecture not only in Russia, but also in the construction of the Russian St.
Alexander Church in the French capital.
From the French correspondence of Sevast’anov, preserved in his personal
archive collection at the Russian State Library in Moscow, we have more in
formation about his “network” in France. Among his correspondents we find
scientists, for example the famous orientalist and specialist in Hindustani
languages Garcin de Tassy (4 letters from 1852),28 or the geographer, orientalist
and archeologist Edmé François Jomard (1777-1862). Especially helpful for
introducing Sevast’anov to the high class society and for his interests in
photography was his acquaintance with a noble lady, Henriette Delbore, whom
he met first probably in Marseilles in 1853, and with whom he was in contact
until 1860.29 She gave him recommendations to different high officials, and
even to the Archbishop of Paris, and took care to introduce him to Olympe
Aguado, a rich banker and passionate photographer, one of the patrons of
French photography.
The expositions of the treasures of Mount Athos and participation in the
sessions of the Photographic Society made Sevast’anov famous.30 In 1861, he
Strange though it may be, but from among the 1500 photographs donated by
Sevast’anov to the S.F.P., not one can be found in Paris.39 However, two large
sized (70x89 and 70x85 cm) cartons with reproductions of photographs from
Athos are preserved at the F.S.P. Both have the English title “Archeological re-
productions taken at Mount Athos by Séwastianoff esq. of Russia—1857”. Prob-
ably they were prepared for demonstrating them in London, at the Royal
Photographic Society. We know that Sevast’anov visited London in March of
1858. However, at that time he had no time to organize an exposition in Lon-
don: in February he was invited to read his paper at the Academy in Paris, and
after a few weeks of intensive preparations, at the beginning of April of 1858,
he left for his next expedition to Athos. So the cartons, probably never used,
remained in Paris.
70 centimes for one offprint. During 16 months of exploitation (July 1856 to October 1857)
Poitevin’s atelier produced more than 18000 photolithographies. Soon Poitevin yielded
his enterprise to J.-B. Lemercier, who owned more ateliers and personnel. Lemercier was
already well-known since the mid-1850s: he worked out the plates (clichés) of Tournachon,
representing animals at the international competition in 1856; in 1857 the minister of
agriculture ordered him to print 120 plates in 2000 copies (Sagne Jean, L’atelier du pho
tographe, 1840-1940, Paris, 1984, p.162). The reason for using photolithography in archaeo
logical and other expeditions was more than obvious, taking into account the instability
of the photographic prints and their high price. It was used in many editions of that time:
Le Sérapéum de Memphis découvert et décrit par Auguste Mariette (Paris, 1857); Exploration
archéologique de la Galatie et de la Bithynie [...] exécutée en 1861. Texte de G. Perrot, photos
de J. Delbet. (Paris, 1872, lithographies Lemercier, procédé Poitevin). See : Michel Frizot,
Nouvelle histoire de la Photographie, pp. 229-230, 376.
37 Géographie de Ptolémée. Reproduction photolithographique du manuscrit grec de monastère
de Vatopédi au Mont Athos, exécutée d’après les clichés obtenus sur la direction de M. Pierre
de Séwastianoff et procédés d’une introduction historique sur le Mont Athos, les monastères
et les dépôts littéraires de la presqu’île sainte par Victor Langlois, Paris, 1867. After a general
preface about the history of Mount Athos and its exploration, a catalog of the Athos
monastic acts is published.
38 RGB, fund 269/1, Carton 17, d. 76.
39 I express my gratitude to Mrs. Flora Triebel, conservator of the 19th century photo col
lection at the French National Library for her help in this research. Part of the archive
materials of Sevast’anov might have been preserved among the papers of A. Didron,
which were lost together with the library of the cathedral of Chartres in the 1940s.
40 Russian National Library (RNB) Glag. 1, 11th century (Sevast’anov’s date: 8-th century),
f. 76v-77, end of the Gospel of Matthew and beginning of Mark).The manuscript was first
discovered at Zographou monastery in 1843. In 1844 the Russian slavist Viktor Grigorovich
viewed and described it. The manuscript was given to Sevast’anov by the abbot Anthym
as a gift for the Russian Emperor Alexander II. In 1861, it was deposited at the Imperial
Public Library (now the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg, Glagolitic No. 1). The
manuscript contains an incomplete text of the Gospels, dated to the end of the 10th or
beginning of the 11th centuries. Edition: Quattor Euangeliorum codex glagoliticus olim
Zographensis nunc Petropolitanus, ed. V. Jagiċ, Berolini, 1879; Graz, 1954).
41 Chrysoboullon of Andronikos II Palaeologus given to the monastery of Zographou of
August of (6797) 1289, confirming all the estates, rights and privileges of the monastery
(Granstrem-Medvedev, p. 281, no. 32; Actes de Zographou, eds. W. Regel, E. Kurtz, B. Kora
blev (=Византийский временник (1907), приложение [appendix] 1, pp. 29-31, No. XI)
The second carton has the same title and contains 8 photographs.
1. Upper left: Ptolemy’s plan of India from the 13th century.44
2. Lower left: Geographical text from the 13th century, colored following the
original.
3. Middle upper row: Greek cross: front view, back view.45
4. Middle row in the middle: Silver cover from a manuscript from the 17th
century.46
5. Middle down row: a Greek manuscript from the 12th century
6. Upper right: Ptolemy’s plan of India. Colored following the original, from
the 13th century
7. Lower right: Geographical text from the 13th century (the same as No. 2,
in black and white).
42 Chrysoboullon of the Bulgarian Tsar Ivan Alexandr of March of 6850 (1342), confirming
the donations given to the Zographou monastery by his relative, Emperor John V
Palaiologos. Latest edition: Cyril Pavlikianov, “Authentic medieval Slavic documents kept
in the Bulgarian Athonite monastery of Zographou (1342-1572)”, Cyrillomethodianum 21
(2016), pp. 53-129.
43 Icon of St. Andrew, previously given to Andrei Murav’ev from the Protaton, later decorated
by him with a silver cover with gold, and donated to St. Andrew’s Skete).
44 Cod. Athos Vatopedi 655.
45 Altar cross from Protaton treasury, 15th-early 16th centuries. Obverse: filigree with stones
and an imbossed insert “Crucifix with forthcoming” in the center. Reverse: a silver plaque
with a Greek inscription. Edition and description: The Treasury of the Protaton. Vol. I
(Mount Athos, 2001): 63-69, fig. 11-13.
46 Moldo-Wallachian work of the 17th century (Sevast’anov’s date: 12th century), Pantocrator
Monastery. The cover is used for a miniature parchment manuscript of the New Testament
and Psalter (Pantocrator 234, 16.5×11.5 cm). A galvanoplastic copy of this cover was made
in St. Petersburg after Sevast’anov’s copy and is conserved as a cover of the Zographou
Glagolitic Gospel. In the inscription under the Annunciation scene, the names of the
Great Komis of Wallachia Barkan and his sons Radul and Mandrikul are written.
4 Conclusion
The two cartons of Petr Sevast’anov’s photos from Mount Athos are a precious
contribution to the history of Byzantine studies of the mid-19-th century. The
images presented there are the first demonstration of basic Greek and Slavonic
manuscripts, acts and artifacts to the learned public of that time and in fact
opened a new period of research of Mount Athos cultural treasures. For about
50 years Sevast’anov’s photos were the only source for most researchers of
these monuments. The photos are important for the history of scientific links
between Russia and France of the late 1850-s, as well as for the history of pho-
tography.
Acknowledgement
This research was financed by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research,
project No. 17-04-00555 OGN.