Table 7.

Impact Area and Climate Stimuli,______________,___________

Climate Stimuli Impact Area

A B

Instructions:
1. In column A, based from the scoping in step 2, list down all the identified climate stimuli.

Climate change stimuli refer to the general changes expected in the climate. These include changes in seasona
number of dry days, sea level rise, and number of days with extreme temperatures.

2. In column B, determine the estimated impact area where the climate stimuli will manifest. Impact area could be t
areas (purok/sitio). The impact area map generated in this Step can provide a better view of the extent of impact of

3. In column C, list down the potential Systems of Interest and Development Sectors that can be affected by the clim
may or may not affect all the systems of interests and the development sectors.
*Systems of Interest: Natural Resources, Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use, Lifeline Facilities
*Sectors: Social, Environment, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic
___________

Areas of Concerns
C
System/s of Interest Sub-Sectors

own all the identified climate stimuli.

ges expected in the climate. These include changes in seasonal temperature and rainfall,
f days with extreme temperatures.

where the climate stimuli will manifest. Impact area could be the whole barangay or specific
this Step can provide a better view of the extent of impact of the cimate stimuli.

est and Development Sectors that can be affected by the climate stimuli. The climate stimuli
the development sectors.
, Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use, Lifeline Facilities
cture, Institution, Economic
Table 8.1. Population CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:

BARANGAY EXPOSURE INDICATORS

A Estimated Population Density

Barangay Affected area
residential area per Hectare of
Population (hectares)
(hectares) Residential Area (1)

Instructions:
1. In Columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each population exposure
(1) Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area = Barangay Population/Estimated residential area (hect
(2) Exposed Population = Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area X Affected area (hectares)
(3) Exposure Percentage = Exposed Population / Barangay Population

2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impa
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage w
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of prop
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short term p

4. In column F, Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in place t
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the syst
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will be c

5. In column G, Compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
ORS SENSITIVITY

C
Percentage of population
Percentage of
Exposed Exposure Percentage of living in dwelling units
young and old
Population (2) Percentage (3) Informal Settlers with walls made of light
to savageable materials dependents

alues for each population exposure and sensitivity indicators.

on/Estimated residential area (hectares)
ea X Affected area (hectares)

d units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
ries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
f fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
ich can be felt within a short term period.

erring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the syste
e are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.
is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
ate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.

e Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
 SENSITIVITY ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

C D
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of
Households Living Access to Post Philhealth
people with malnourished
below the poverty Disaster Financing Coverage
disabilities threshold individuals

ed rating scale.
he system.
itivities of the system.

n describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrim

ddress the impacts.

ategories:
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY DEGREE OF IMPACT ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
SCORE SCORE

D
Houeshold
Government
capacity to Government
Capacity to
relocate or to Resources
retrofit Generate Job
E F

disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

 VULNERABILITY

Vulnerability Index Vulnerability Score

Table 8.2. Natural Resources CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:

BARANGAY EXPOSURE INDICATORS

A Area by dominant Exposed Area Exposure

Dominant crop
crop (hectares) (hectares) (1) Percentage (2)

Instructions:

1. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each natural resources
(1) GIS Derived
(2) Exposure Percentage = Exposed Area / Area by dominant crop
(3) Exposed Value (Php) = Average potential income per hectare per year X Exposed Area (hectares)

2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential im
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property dama
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of p
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short ter

D4 In column F, Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in pla
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will

5. In column G, Compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, b
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
ORS SENSITIVIT

Average potential Number farming Percentage of farming

Exposed Value
income per hectare families who attended families using sustainble
(Php) (3)
per year (Php) climate field schools production techniques

alues for each natural resources exposure and sensitivity

Exposed Area (hectares)

d units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
ries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
f fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
ich can be felt within a short term period.

ferring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the
e are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.
is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
ate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.

e Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
 SENSITIVITY

Percentage of farmers Percentage of Percentage of areas

Percentage of areas
with access to hazard production area with with water
with irrigation coverage
information infrastructure coverafe impoundment

sing the suggested rating scale.

nt sensitivity of the system.
and current sensitivities of the system.

ptive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or sho

l assistance to address the impacts.

dex scores into categories:

 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

D
Agricultural
Alternative
Access to Extension Services of Early Warning Government
Livelihood
Insurance the Local Systems Resources
Government

h very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

 DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE VULNERABILITY
IMPACT SCORE CAPACITY SCORE

Vulnerability Index Vulnerability Score

E F
Table 8.3. Critical Facilities CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:

BARANGAY EXPOSURE INDICATORS

B
A
Type Name Storeys Exposed Area

Instructions:
A. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each critical facility exposu
2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impa
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage w
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of prop
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short term p

D. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
effects/impacts.
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in place t
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the syst
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will be c

E. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
 SENSITIVITY ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

C D
Capacity (Bed/ Structure
Wall Materials Insurance
Classroom capacity, Used
Existing Condition employing hazard
Coverage
Loading capacity) resistant design

alues for each critical facility exposure and sensitivity

d units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
ries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
f fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
ich can be felt within a short term period.

erring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the syste

e are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.

is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
ate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.

e Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE VULNERABILITY
IMPACT SCORE CAPACITY SCORE
D G
Local Government Vulnerability Vulnerability
Resources for Risk
Mitigation Index Score
E F

ested rating scale.

of the system.
ensitivities of the system.

s can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term d

o address the impacts.

o categories:
disruption or short to long term detrimental
Table 8.4. Lifeline Facilities CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:

BARANGAY EXPOSURE INDICATORS

A Replacement Cost
Exposed length
Road Name Road Classification per linear
(linear kilometers)
kilometer (Php)

Instructions:
1. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each lifeline facility exposu
(1) Value of exposed lifeline = Replacement Cost per linear kilometer Exposed length (linear kilometers)

2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impa
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage w
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of prop
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short term p

4. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
detrimental effects/impacts.
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in place t
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the syst
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will be c

5. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
 SENSITIVITY ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

C D

Value of exposed Hazard Resistant Insurance

Surface type Existing Condition
lifeline (1) Design Coverage

alues for each lifeline facility exposure and sensitivity

posed length (linear kilometers)

d units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
ries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
f fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
ich can be felt within a short term period.

erring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the syste

e are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.

is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
ate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.

e Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
 ADAPTIVE CAPACITY DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE VULNERABILITY
IMPACT SCORE CAPACITY SCORE

D G
Available
Government Vulnerability Index Vulnerability Score
Resources
E F

uggested rating scale.

ity of the system.
nt sensitivities of the system.

ities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term

ce to address the impacts.

into categories:
minimal disruption or short to long term
Table 8.5. Urban Use CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:

BARANGAY EXPOSURE INDICATORS

A Area per land use

Existing land use Exposed area in Percentage of
per category in
(Specfic Use) hectares hectares Exposure (1)

Instructions:
A. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each urban use facility
(1) Percentage of Exposure = Exposed area in hectares/Area per land use per category in hectares
(2) Exposed Value= Exposed area in hectares X 10,000 X Replacement Cost per Sq. Meter (PhP)

2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential im
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property dama
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of p
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short ter

4. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity in
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in pla
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will

5. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, b
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
ORS
SENSITIVITY

Percentage of buildings
Percentage of building
Replacement Cost Exposed Value with walls made with
in dilapidated/
per Sq. Meter (PhP) (Php) (2) light to savageable condemned condition
materials

alues for each urban use facility exposure and sensitivity

per category in hectares
st per Sq. Meter (PhP)

d units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
ries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
f fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
ich can be felt within a short term period.

erring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the s
e are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.
is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
ate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.

e Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
 SENSITIVITY ADAPTIVE CAPACITY

C D
No access/area Capacity And
Percentage of structures coverage to Willingness to
Insurance
not employing hazard- infrastructure-related Retrofit or Relocate
resistant building design hazard mitigation or Conform with Coverage
measures New Regulations

sing the suggested rating scale.

nt sensitivity of the system.
and current sensitivities of the system.

tive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or sho

l assistance to address the impacts.

dex scores into categories:

 DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
IMPACT SCORE CAPACITY SCORE

D
Local Government
Capacity to
Available Government
Impose/
Alternative Sites Resources Implement Zoning
Regulations
E F

pacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.
 VULNERABILITY

Vulnerability Index Vulnerability Score

Table 4.6 Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Summary Matrix
System of Interest:__________________________
Climate Stimuli: ____________________________

Decision Area/s Technical Findings

A B
Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________
Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Sector:___________________

Instructions:
A. Based on the vulneravility maps generated for the various exposure units, highlight and identify decision areas or elements. Decision areas can be the barangay or specific sites

- identify decision areas in need of intervention based on the vulnerability maps

- This can be identified as high to moderate vulnerable areas or may pertain to a specific area in the barangay

B. List down the significant findings/observed conditions and causes by describing the area or element in terms of the level of vulnerability, highlighting the various contributing f

- identify the climate stimuli and how these may manifest in the identified decision area
- expound on the exposure information (i.e. number of affected population, exposure percentage, exposed area, and cost)

- highlight relevant sensitivities of the exposed element to the identified climate stimulus
- highlight relevant adaptive capacity indicators of the exposed element to the identified climate stimuli

C. List down the planning/development implications when the identified vulnerabilities in the various decision areas are not addressed.
- highlight potential impact as mentioned in the sectoral impact chains
- highlight future scenario if vulnerabilities are not addressed
- identify future needs with emphasis on the spatial framework plan of the municipality

D. Identify various policy interventions that should seek to reduce the level of vulnerability by addressing the exposure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive cap

- identify the various climate change adaptation and mitigation measures to reduce vulnerabilities to acceptable and tolerable levels.
Implications Policy Interventions
C D
or elements. Decision areas can be the barangay or specific sites in the barangay such as coastal area, mountain sides, and riverbanks.

the level of vulnerability, highlighting the various contributing factors such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.

and cost)

as are not addressed.

sure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive capacities

nd tolerable levels.