Page 1

1
2
3 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission 11-8-2020
4 Address: GPO Box 24234, Melbourne VIC 3001
5 Telephone: 1300 735 135
6 Email: info@ibac.vic.gov.au
7
8 20200811-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission ex C-VO 20-6752
9
10 Sir/Madam,
11 It appears to me to be clear that the Victorian Police is getting totally out of hand.
12 I reproduce below a email I received which indicates the police ignore the “medical condition”
13 https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-work-covid-19#what-does-wearing-a-face-covering-mean
14 QUOTE
15  You must carry a face covering with you when leaving home for one of the four reasons, even if you don’t
16 need to wear it while undertaking your current activity, for example you can take your face covering off to
17 eat. If you have a medical condition that prevents you from wearing a face covering at all times you
18 don’t need to carry it with you.
19 END QUOTE
20
21 I understand this 17 year old girl did have a medical exemption but the police ignored this
22 claiming she MUST wear a mask.
23
24 Must view!! In my Opinion Cop attmpted Sexual Assault.... on a
25 Young Gir 17..
26 11 Aug at 2:21 pm
27 healthachievers - <healthachievers@hotmail.com>
28 https://www.facebook.com/100008876711059/videos/2339868449652356
29
30 And
31
32 QUOTE
33 How innocent People on their Own - Get Attacked by Police
34 10 Aug at 8:43 pm
35
36 healthachievers - <healthachievers@hotmail.com>
37 Hopefully, you can open up Link:
38
39 https://www.facebook.com/fiona.mcmurdo.1/posts/3067918993320622
40
41 Sitting in the Sun alone, no one near me, minding my own business, no one within 10 metres of me waiting for
42 my fish & chips.
43 Police car swoops in as if they had just spotted a Criminal Stabbing someone.
44 Why are you not wearing a mask?

11-8-2020 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 Officer there is no one around

2 Why are you not wearing a mask?
3 Have I disturbed the peace?
4 No answer
5 You name & address?
6 Have I disturbed the peace?
7 Well it’s Law to wear one
8 No, it’s NOT LAW it just highly recommended
9 I am #peacefullyprotesting
10 You are under arrest
11 No, you can’t arrest me I haven’t broken the law.
12 Violently thrown face down over the bonnet of the car, one arm up my back, sunglasses go flying onto his
13 windshield, prescription glasses, cost shitloads, other hand reaching for my sunglasses, the demon (which is
14 very angry) throws me to the ground violently and tightly handcuffs me with his KNEE on my NECK!!!
15 The lady Senior Constable whilst I’m handcuffed reaches into my wallet (no permission) and takes out my
16 Drivers License.
17 Check me out - no outstanding warrants
18 He uncuffs me and tells me he is sending me some TOILET PAPER with numerals on it.
19 I stand and LOOK HIM IN HIS DEMON EYES and tell him “I am NOT someone YOU FUCK WITH”
20 He has been SERVED NOTICE!
21 Neither the EMERALD or PAKENHAM Police stations answered their phones.
22 PUSSIES!
23 END QUOTE
24
25 Consider:
26
27 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
28 Australasian Convention)
29 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
30 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and
31 the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in
32 this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the
33 peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 A political protest is a constitutional rights and Premier Daniel Andres himself made clear the
37 Police not to act against BLM protestors who were in their thousands protesting.
38
39 I prove below also a copy of my set out to Northland Centre management:
40
41 QUOTE 11-8-2020 COMPLAINT
42 Northland Centre Management 11-8-2020
43 Northland.ShoppingCentre@vicinity.com.au.
44
45 20200811-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Northland Centre management
46 COMPLAINT
47 Sir/Madam,
48 I on Monday 2020 attended to Northland shopping complex as I will set out below
49 and was accost by 2 male persons purportedly being security personnel. As I recall it number 404
50 and 258. However upon my request they refused to identify themselves and also refused to write
51 down their numbers for me.
52
53 Safety is an issue for the Centra and in particular where there are elderly and also young women
54 in the Centre it is essential that those claiming to be security can identify themselves as such.
55 After all ample of person who work elsewhere may be shopping at the centre and then may
56 approach a person in the centre to be centre security but being an impostor and obtain then
57 private details as to afterward rob or even commit rape. Hence I view Centre management must
58 ensure that any so called security is when requested able to produce some form of identification.

11-8-2020 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 Being it a photo identification or like that. Merely having a number in my view is insufficient as
2 that proves absolutely nothing.
3
4 Again, I specifically requested their details and that was refused.
5
6 As you must be aware the State government issued a directive that all people in Victoria must
7 wear a mask, in particular in Melbourne itself. However it made an exemption:
8
9 https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-work-covid-19#what-does-wearing-a-face-
10 covering-mean
11 QUOTE

12  You must carry a face covering with you when leaving home for one of
13 the four reasons, even if you don’t need to wear it while undertaking
14 your current activity, for example you can take your face covering off to
15 eat. If you have a medical condition that prevents you from wearing
16 a face covering at all times you don’t need to carry it with you.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 It must be clear therefore that the directions of the government must be read with this exemption,
20 and as such anyone seeking to enforce compulsory mask wearing cannot violate this above stated
21 exemption.
22 .
23 However, I was not only accosted by the 2 so called security guards and while there is no legal
24 requirement for a person to produce a medical exemption I neverthe less did so as those so called
25 security personas claim that they had to enforce government requirements, which clearly they
26 didn, where I was not a wearing a mask for medical condition, but not only did they as I
27 understand it made clear they would use force to remove me from the centre is I didn’t produce a
28 medical exemption, but even after that when I went shopping in Coles they called the police who
29 after a communication made clear I had to pay for my groceries and leave the centre because it
30 was private property, etc. This as I was not wearing a mask, even so they too had seen my
31 medical exemption. The police also making clear they didn’t know about any exemption but they
32 would check it out afterwards.
33
34 As such neither the so called security nor the police had any proper knowledge as to what really
35 was applicable.
36
37 Worse is, that person 404 was repeatedly putting his hand on the mask he was wearing and
38 lowered onto his skin to say something to me and then putting the mask back over his mouth. He
39 didn’t use the elastic for this, which is the proper manner to do so.
40 As such, if he had any COVID-19 on the mask then he would have contaminated his hand with
41 this. When I showed the medical certificate in a plastic cover he demanded I take it out. I then
42 handed it to him and he showed it tohe other so called security person and then gave it back to
43 me. So, if his hand was contaminated then now he contaminated the medical certificate.
44 And so the other so called security person.
45 I have been a person shopping at Northland Shopping Centre for about 45 years and do not
46 accept that this “unlawful” conduct is appropriate and threatened to use force against me.
47
48 But there is more to it.
49 When I was near the cash register in Coles 2 police officers then approached me and requested
50 my drivers licence. I explained I was not driving a car.
11-8-2020 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 I have never seen any customer driving a car into Coles store and was clearly walking) The
2 police insisted that I had to identify myself. They had a complaint that I was in the shopping
3 centre contrary to government directions without a mask. I did explain that I had shown the
4 medical exemption to them and the police claimed they were not informed about this.
5 Nevertheless the Acting Sgt insisted for my drivers licence and I provided this. It appeared to
6 me that during the communication of some length he was at times slightly adjusting his mask by
7 touching it at the front. As such, if the mask was infected he would have gotten it on his hands
8 and when touching my drivers license would likely have contaminated this also. He also handed
9 my drivers license to the other police officer so here we go likely spreading a disease. Anyhow
10 he also claimed not to know about any exemption but asked if I had one. I explained there was
11 no legal requirement to produce an exemption but nevertheless I took it out of the folder and
12 handed it to him. So now if 404 was infected and placed it on the medical certificate then now
13 the police officer touching it could now be infected. And if the Police officer was infected then
14 now he could have spread it to the document and in the process he too could have infected me.
15
16 While the police didn’t charge me t that time, because they had to check the website as to what I
17 stated, I did make clear that if they were to issue a summons against me I would be prepared for
18 the litigation. As demanded by the police I paid and left the Centre without being able to
19 complete any shopping at Aldi.
20
21 What the above ought to indicate that Centre management in my view failed to have a proper
22 system in place and in fact by this can cause the spread of any disease in the process. Not to
23 ignore this is what eventuated in the hotel fiasco’s also.
24
25 I last October rushed my 87 year old wife to a hospital and she ended up 10 days in the hospital
26 (including ICU) relating to Hearth Failure and other underlying health issues. As such, I need to
27 be very careful as to my wife’s health issues.
28 When then COVID-19 came around and noticed the lockdown in china, and suspecting that
29 Premier Daniel Andres is a Chinese bot I held it better to prepare for any onslaught that likely
30 may follow in Australia.
31 As a constitutionalist (and now retired) Professional Advocate I realised that I would need to do
32 my research in case it would come down to a showdown and keep records on a backup hard
33 drive in a fire proof safe just in case.
34
35 My wife always berated me to be ignorant to health issues but now saw a transformation that I
36 researched COVID-19 issues extensively.
37
38 While it is claimed that COVID-19 is a transmissible infectious disease reality might be totally
39 different in that I suspect that like the Legionnaires Disease relating to certain water towers and
40 hearing systems COVID-19 likely may also be a “bacterium” that eventuates at certain locations.
41 For example reportedly none of the about 186 public nursing homes have any COVID-19
42 infections where as numerous private nursing homes have people being infected as well as its
43 staff.
44 This may indicate that the disease known as COVID-19 may rather be a localised issue perhaps
45 relating to house keeping and not at all being some infectious disease.
46 I am not a scientist or a medical doctor but rely upon the numerous videos and articles of
47 virologist, pathologist, medical doctors, etc. As such I merely give my views based upon
48 thousands of videos, articles, etc I considered.
49

11-8-2020 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 If like the Legionnaires Disease is all comes back to a housekeeping issue then obviously the
2 wearing of mask, LOCKDOWNS and curfew, etc, are utterly useless as they do not address the
3 core issue that causes the disease to spread.
4 Nevertheless the Government has issued directive and Centre management may hold it is bound
5 to enforce this. Again it really isn’t enforcing it rather a half baked version.
6 Let me explain using a hypothetical example:
7 “A” ask “B” if he is willing to come along to go on Friday evening to Northland Cinema.
8 “B” respond: “It is too busy with virtually no parking facilities and so I don’t like going.
9 “C” later ask “A” have you asked “B” to come along on Friday night to the cinema?. Upon
10 this “A” respond” I did but “B” made known he doesn’t like to go to Northland Cinema.”
11 Clearly this is incorrect, as “A” is now changing the reason of “B” not desiring to go to the
12 cinema is the parking issue and not that he doesn’t like to go to the cinema.
13
14 And other example:
15 “A” ask “B” ig he likes to go to the Sunday market”, upon which “B” respond “I do not
16 like to go to the Sunday market if it rains.” Later “C” ask “A” did you ask “B” to go with
17 us to the Sunday market?” And “A” respond, “I did, and “B” made known he doesn’t like
18 to go to the Sunday Market.”.
19 Again “A” changed the context of what had actually stated by concealing part of what “B”
20 actually had stated and so misstated “B” reason not wanting to go to the Sunday Market “when it
21 rains”.
22
23 Likewise the so called security persons and the Victorian Police are enforcing some government
24 directive by misrepresenting what it really is about by concealing the part of “Medical condition”
25 exemption and demanding also a “medical certificate” even so this is not required whatsoever.
26 .
27 In fact me wife requested me to obtain from the hospital a medical certificate for exemption of
28 wearing a mask and the “written” response was that because my wife has a “medical condition”
29 she doesn’t need to wear a mask and no medical certificate is required to prove this. And this
30 referred to the website of the Department of Health.
31
32 With what eventuated now involving myself my wife is terrified to go anywhere as she
33 understand a risk of a $2,000 fine and court litigation merely if she were to go shopping in
34 Northland, regardless that she has the written response from the Hospital she doesn’t need to
35 wear a mask and no medical certificate is needed.
36
37 I understand that not just shopping centres but even stores on their own can set conditions as
38 long as they are reasonable for enforcement.
39 As such if a store displays a sign that bags can be inspected than clearly this is a condition of
40 entry.
41 Some businesses may have that one is not permitted to enter wearing slippers., again for safety
42 one cannot argue against this.
43 Ample of stores show warning that a customer must be over 18 to be served. This again might be
44 a reasonable government policy that one cannot object to.
45 None of them can be considered to be discriminatory because it applies across the board and can
46 be considered to be reasonable.
47 .
48 Now lets hold that the Government were to issue a directive to be enforced by stores that anyone
49 who wears “prescription glasses” are not be allowed into the store. Obviously this would not be a
50 reasonable demand and stores owners should therefore object to such a ridiculous demand to be
51 enforced. There can be numerous other kinds of examples but you may get the gist.
11-8-2020 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 Any government demand must be reasonable to be enforced.

2 .
3 If say the government were to issue a directive that any person attending a store must not be
4 allowed to enter if they have a left thumb unless the cut it off before entering, then it would be
5 obvious that no store owner could demand a potential customer to engage in self harm.
6
7 So, this seems to be very obvious.
8 ‘
9 Just that really the same applied with wearing a mask!
10
11 Positive Tests Are Not COVID Cases - Where's the Epidemic_ - Dr Tim O'Shea
12 QUOTE
13 Surgeon General Jerome Adams:
14
15 Wearing face masks could actually increase
16 The risk of contracting COVID-19
17 END QUOTE
18
19 www.who.int/publications-detail/advis-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-
20 care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak
21
22 “the wide use of masks by healthy people … is not
23 supported by current evidence… and carries
24 uncertainties and critical risks….”
25
26
27 “…there is currently no evidence that wearing a
28 mask by healthy can prevent infection with
29 respiratory viruses including COVID-19”
30
31 “Keep a distance of at least 1 meter from
32 Other people.”
33
34 British Medical Journal: 9 Apr 20
35 http://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1435/rr-40
36
37 Covid-19: important potential side effects of wearing face mask
38
39 “face masks make breathing more difficult. For
40 people with COPD, masks are in fact intolerable as
41 they worsen their breathlessness.[5] Moreover, a
42 fraction of carbon dioxide previously exhaled is inhaled
43 at each respiratory cycle. This may worsen the burden
44 of covid-19.”
45
46 ‘…mask fabric ;;; can determine an increase in viral load
47 and therefore they can defeat the innate immunity
48 … an increase in infections.”
49
50 It is not time to act without evidence.”
51
52 BMJ 2020 Face mask for public during the covid-19 crisis
11-8-2020 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 H ttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1435
2 “no random trial of mask so far for COVID-19
3
4 “No randomised trials of masks so far for covid-19
5 “we did not find any published data that directly
6 support the use of masks by the public.”
7
8 “10 randomised controlled trials .. that tested the
9 efficacy of face masks… meta-analysis found no
10 significant reduction in influenza transmission.”
11
12 “…31 eligible studies … The evidence is not
13 sufficient strong to support the use of facemasks
14 as a protective measure against covid-19.”
15
16 In my view the wearing of a mask as such while in charge of a motor vehicle could lead to an
17 accident. Yet many drivers view they are obligated to wear a mask while driving.
18
19 There are numerous other experts reports pointing out that a mask is rather dangerous to use, in
20 particular for long periods. Yet the police are nevertheless stopping drivers for not wearing a
21 mask disregarding any medical condition exemptions.
22 Also, if any infectious disease is about droplets or aerosol then a facemask is not protecting the
23 eyes which often are the most vulnerable parts for an infection, at least I understand this from
24 experts reports. Likewise a face-shield would not protect because the aerosol would simply go
25 around the shield and enter the open areas. As such, a biochemical suit for every customer might
26 be perhaps an answer. It that reasonable practicable, one has to ask?
27
28 Lets us use another hypothetical example:
29 A driver wearing a mask is affected by the lack of oxygen and end up smashing into the centre
30 and by this killing customers. The driver because of Centre management policy to enforce the
31 wearing of mask and having delivered goods to a store now due to the lack of oxygen ended up
32 in an accident. In my view Centre management indirectly it enforcing government policy must
33 be also held legally liable. In my view it had a DUTY OF CARE to ensure that any government
34 policy is and remains to be reasonable. It could have used its lawyers to petition the Government
35 not to pursue a dangerous practice of wearing a mask to be enforced. If it failed to do so it clearly
36 at least in my view failed in its DUTY OF CARE.
37
38 As was made clear during the Nuremberg trails “Following orders” is no excuse when one
39 act in violation of a persons legal rights.
40
41 Clearly I was ordered to leave for no other reason that I was on private property and not wearing
42 a mask. That in my view violated my legal rights and clearly a policy that the Government itself
43 has not as such stipulated as it clearly provided for exemptions for “medical condition”.
44
45 There is however more to this all:
46
47 I will below provide some quotations of the Hansard Constitution Convention Debates for the
48 creation of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) of which within section
49 106 the states were created “subject to this constitution” and it should be clear that the Framers
50 of the Constitution stated:
51
11-8-2020 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) provides that “QUARANTINE”,
2 which our Framers of the Constitution limited it as follows:
3
4 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
5 Convention)
6 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
7
8 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
9 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
10 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 For the same I view regarding the Victorian Police that it cannot enforce some purported Health
14 and Welbeing Act as it cannot operate in violation of the BioSecurity Act 2015 of the
15 Commonwealth, which has exclusive jurisdiction regarding diseases relating to “man-kind”.
16
17 It should be understood that the Commonwealth cannot give legislative powers to a State where
18 is already has legislation on foot for the subject matter, and neither can the State create its own
19 legislative powers purportedly in concurrence with Commonwealth legislative powers.
20 .
21 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the Commonwealth
24 legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the states will
30 nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.

31 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

32 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws will, however,
33 remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of making these new laws will be
34 all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
38 QUOTE
39 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
40 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
41 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
42 the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 It makes not one iota different if the Commonwealth may or may not have agreed for the States
46 to enact any kind of legislation like the (purported) Health and Welbeing Act (Vic) as the
47 Commonwealth had not such constitutional powers to allow for this. All Commonwealth
48 legislation must be “uniform” throughout the Commonwealth. Neither is there any mechanism
49 provided in the constitution as to allow the commonwealth to transfer its legislative powers back
50 to the States.
51
52 Also, the “concurrent” legislative powers existed only for so far that the Commonwealth had not
53 commenced to legislate upon the subject matter. Once the Commonwealth did then as the
54 quotations make clear that is the end of any State legislative powers.
11-8-2020 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1
2 One should however not overlook that it would be appropriate for a State to apply for and obtain
3 a specific court order regarding a person who “on medical assessment” was found to carry an
4 infectious disease. However, there is no such power to LOCKDOWN healthy people or to deny
5 businesses to normally operate.
6
7 A (purported) law (/regulation/directive/etc) that violates the constitution is no law at all. I do not
8 fear to have a court battle as I am well prepared for this and will fight for the rights of others in
9 the process so that they may live and not end up committing suicide, etc
10
11 How absurd that my 87 year old wife, who cannot drive a motor vehicle, now cannot allegedly
12 go with me to a store, say for a haircut or whatever, but she can go with a stranger who drives a
13 taxi (at huge cost). Likewise, she could go with a stranger in a taxi (who could cause her to be
14 infected) to do shopping, but I as her husband cannot accompany her. So at her age struggling to
15 even walk 100 metres she is denied to have me, as usual, to accompany her for shopping. I do
16 not know if those who issued those orders ever had a brain scan, as they might not have any.
17
18 I did ask the Acting Sgt if he was using the body camera and he confirmed this. I have asked for
19 a copy of the transcript and video.
20 I do not know if the 2 so called security persons also had a body camera or other recording
21 device going but I request Centre management to provide with copies if they do exist. Keep in
22 mind that as I understand it the police claimed that the so called security persons had not told
23 them that I had shown the medical certificate, as I keep the document in a plastic file I can
24 always prove it that the DNA of 404 is on the document. As such, there can be no denial he had
25 it in his hands.
26
27 This then places the question why was the police called in the first place purporting that I
28 was allegedly trespassing without a mask?
29
30 So now the elderly, as I am a senior citizen, are being what I view terrorised to engage in self
31 harm merely because Centre Management didn’t make sure that the so called security is fully
32 aware as to what really is applicable.
33
34 Just that they picked on the wrong person as I was all along prepared for this. In my view Centre
35 management cannot discriminate against me for not wearing a mask where I have a “medical
36 condition”. Also in my view Centre Management had an obligation towards store holders,
37 including Aldi, that it not unreasonable prevents potential customers to shop at its store.
38
39 Those who are going about as so called security persons in my view do not have any medical
40 qualifications to somehow overrule a medical certificate. Neither is the hall way or for that a
41 store the appropriate venue for so called security persons or even the Victorian Police to make
42 any assessment of a persons health. As the police established the medical certificate was dated
43 31/7 (31 July) and as such valid, even so again, no medical certificate is required.
44
45 Let it be clear I didn’t in any way pursue any conflicts. If the 2 so called security persons had had
46 a proper understanding about a customers legal rights, including about medical conditions as an
47 exemption, they might never even have bothered me. However the police becoming involve that
48 I was trespassing to me is totally unacceptable.
49
50 People, even young children, as I understand from reports are committing suicide and other self-
51 harm because of the LOCKDOWN’s, CURFEW’s, etc. yet it is reported that during the curfew
11-8-2020 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1 the premier goes to Tullamarine Airport and thanking pilots for delivering about 21 plane loads
2 of electronic equipment in passengers planes, all without wearing a mask and those electronic
3 equipment from a foreign power.
4 We were told that passengers planes were diverted, and would not be allowed to land in
5 Melbourne, yet during CURFEW a reported 21 passengers plane but loaded with electronic
6 surveillance equipment ( nothing to do with combating COVID-19) were nevertheless landing in
7 secret. This placing citizens at risk of another disease breakout.
8 As such, it appears to me that this entire mask, lockdown and curfew have absolutely nothing to
9 do with protecting anyone’s health but is to use it for ulterior purposes. While Centre
10 management may hold this is irrelevant to its running a shopping centre, well there is yet another
11 outbreak of a serious disease in China involving a tick, and if those boxes of those planes happen
12 to have tick’s in them as they were not decontaminated, etc, then we may face another deadly
13 disease. That means further denial of economy recovery.
14
15 Many who invested lifelong work in establish a viable business now found it to be destroyed
16 beyond their fault. Well, at least I am not one to ignore my duties and obligations to my fellow
17 citizens. Centre management now has a choice to be ld by the nose regardless how destructive
18 this might be or to stand up if for its customers and businesses within its shopping complex.
19
20 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
21 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

22 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

23 (Our name is our motto!)
24 END QUOTE 11-8-2020 COMPLAINT
25
26
27 I have urged people time and time again to remain calm and use the Courts however, the police
28 cannot continue to act like a gang of constitutional terrorist and should avoid any physical
29 confrontations.
30 .
31 https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-work-covid-19#what-does-wearing-a-face-covering-mean
32 QUOTE
33  You must carry a face covering with you when leaving home for one of the four reasons, even if you don’t
34 need to wear it while undertaking your current activity, for example you can take your face covering off to
35 eat. If you have a medical condition that prevents you from wearing a face covering at all times you
36 don’t need to carry it with you.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 My wife, last week, sought to have her specialist at the hospital to issue a “medical certificate”
40 but the “written” response was that there is no requirement to have a medical certificate to
41 exempt her from wearing a mask because the Department of Health has clearly provided for
42 exemptions. (see above quoted part). It is clear that the Victorian Police are acting unlawful and
43 yet they persist in my view as a group of thugs. When will this stop?
44
45 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
46 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

47 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

48 (Our name is our motto!)
11-8-2020 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati