Annual Report On Homelessness 2020

State of Utah
Annual Report on
HOMELESSNESS
2020
WORKFORCE
WORKFORCE
SERVICES
SERVICES
HOUSING & COMMUNITY
HOUSING & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
2
WORKFORCE
SERVICES
HOUSING & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING.UTAH.GOV
Cover photos courtesy of Catholic Community Services of Utah.
Equal Opportunity Employer/Program • Auxiliary aids and services are available

upon request to individuals with disabilities by calling (801) 526-9240. Individuals with
speech and/or hearing impairments may call the Relay Utah by dialing 711. Spanish
Relay Utah: 1-888-346-3162.
3
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
STATE ORGANIZATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
DATA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
DATA BY AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
• State of Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
• Salt Lake County CoC & LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
• Mountainland CoC & LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Summit County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Utah County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Wasatch County.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
• Balance of State CoC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Bear River LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
–Box Elder County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
–Cache County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Carbon-Emery LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Davis LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Grand LHCC.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Iron LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
San Juan LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Six County LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
–Sanpete County.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
– Sevier County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Tooele LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Uintah Basin LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
–Duchesne County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
–Uintah County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Washington LHCC.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Weber-Morgan LHCC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The year 2020 brought Utah and the rest of the nation an unprecedented and unforeseen new set of
challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting every aspect of life for every individual, business,
service provider and governmental organization. Congress largely worked to address the impacts of the
pandemic through the CARES Act, which included funds desperately needed for homeless services. The
use of those funds is not reflected in this document, as the data reported here concludes with the Point-in-
Time Count in January 2020. Next year’s annual report will include data related to the pandemic and the
CARES Act.
Homelessness is a statewide issue impacting every county in Utah. The state of Utah is committed to
using data to evaluate and inform efforts to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in the
state. There are ongoing efforts to improve the accuracy of the data used to evaluate performance in
each of these areas. Some 2018 and 2019 data have been updated from the 2019 Report to reflect these
improvements to HMIS data.
MAKING HOMELESSNESS RARE

While the overall number of Utahns experiencing homelessness on a single night increased from 2019,
the number of people accessing services over the course of a year decreased. The differences in these
numbers are influenced by improved counting efforts and changes in the type and number of services
tracked in HMIS.
• The 2020 Point-in-Time (PIT) count showed an increase of 12% in the number of people counted as
literally homeless on a single night when compared to 2019. Nearly 90% of this increase occurred within
the count of individuals in an unsheltered situation. This increase was influenced by improved and
expanded coordination and participation in the count by Local Homeless Coordinating Committees
across the state, which allowed for more thorough and broad coverage than was achieved in the past.
• Comparing the PIT to the most recent estimate of the state’s population by the U.S. Census
Bureau reveals that approximately 10 out of every 10,000 people in the state were experiencing
homelessness on the night of the PIT. This rate is slightly higher than last year and consistent with
the state’s rate of homelessness in 2015.
• The number of individuals accessing emergency shelter or transitional housing over a period of 12
months, based on data from the Utah Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) showed a
decrease of 5.5% when compared to the prior federal reporting cycle.
• Of individuals in the HMIS annual counts, 62% were experiencing homelessness for the first time,
suggesting the need for identifying additional ways of preventing initial instances of homelessness.
5
MAKING HOMELESSNESS BRIEF

The length of stay in emergency shelters increased slightly from 2019 and remains an area for
improvement.
• The statewide average length of stay in emergency shelter, as recorded in HMIS, was 55.4 nights, an
increase of about 1 day when compared to the prior federal reporting cycle.
MAKING HOMELESSNESS NON-RECURRING

The numbers of individuals being permanently housed and those returning to homelessness after being
housed are moving in positive directions. However, the rise in the number of individuals experiencing
chronic homelessness demonstrates that there continues to be a need for improvement in these areas.
• When compared to the prior federal reporting cycle, the number of individuals known to be exiting
homeless services to permanent housing remained stable.
• The percentage of individuals returning to homelessness within two years continued to decrease when
compared to the prior two federal reporting cycles.
• The number of chronically homeless individuals reported on the PIT rose from 512 to 688. Of those,
64% came from the count of unsheltered individuals and was influenced by the improved unsheltered
count throughout the state. The number of chronically homeless individuals nearly doubled in both
the Balance of State and Mountainland CoCs highlighting the need for affordable housing options and
resources, including permanent supportive housing, throughout the state.
• The system is highly effective in keeping the most vulnerable housed, with 93% of individuals who
are enrolled in permanent housing projects other than rapid rehousing either exiting to or retaining
permanent housing within the prior federal reporting cycle.
STATE ORGANIZATION
The State of Utah is divided into three Continua of Care (CoC) and 13 Local Homeless Coordinating
Committees (LHCC). The CoCs and LHCCs are regional and local planning bodies that are responsible for
aligning funding, promoting data quality, and coordinating housing and homeless services for families
and individuals experiencing homelessness throughout the state.
The CoCs are entities designated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to:
• Promote a community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness;

• Provide funding for efforts by nonprofit providers and state and local governments to quickly rehouse
homeless individuals and families while minimizing the trauma and dislocation caused to homeless
individuals, families, and communities;
6
• Promote the utilization of mainstream programs and benefits; and
• Utilize data to redirect services, funding, and resources as necessary.
The LHCCs are counties or groups of counties determined by the State Homeless Coordinating Committee
and are the designated local oversight bodies that are responsible for:
• Developing a common agenda and vision for reducing homelessness in their respective regions;
• Developing a spending plan that coordinates the funding supplied to local stakeholders;
• Monitoring the progress toward achieving state and local goals; and
• Aligning local funding to projects that improve outcomes and target specific needs in the community.
UTAH LHCCS
BEAR RIVER
WEBER -
MORGAN
DAVIS
SALT
LAKE
TOOELE UINTAH
MOUNTAINLAND BASIN Continuum of Care
Balance of State — 11 LHCCs
• 25 Counties throughout the state
Mountainland — 1 LHCC
CARBON - • Summit County

SIX COUNTY
EMERY GRAND • Utah County
• Wasatch County
Salt Lake County — 1 LHCC
• Salt Lake County
• Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End
Homelessness
IRON
SAN JUAN
WASHINGTON
7
DATA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT

The following sections present data for each of the following reports at the State, CoC, LHCC, and county
levels. Please note that System Performance Measure data is only available at the State, CoC, and LHCC
level.
The Utah Annual Report on Homelessness includes several types of data from different sources. When
reviewed together, these reports can provide a more well-rounded picture of this complex issue. The types
of data found throughout the rest of this report are described below.
Note: ‘No Data To Report’ is used in this report to indicate one of the following:
• The specific measure did not contain any data due to a lack of applicable projects in the area.
• All results for the area or measure were ‘0’.
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES

For many years, HUD has reviewed the impact of its funds on reducing homelessness on a program-
by-program basis. As a result, it has been difficult to gain an accurate and comprehensive community-
level understanding of the performance of the homelessness services system. To address this need and
comply with the federal HEARTH Act, HUD has developed several system-level performance measures
to be reported on a Continuum of Care (CoC) level. Data is managed in the Utah Homeless Management
Information System (HMIS). The HUD system performance measures help CoCs more accurately evaluate
their impacts, successes, and challenges to inform strategic decisions in the development of the homeless
system. Some service providers, including those dedicated to serving survivors of domestic violence, are
prohibited from or choose not to participate in HMIS. As a result, system performance measure data does
not always reflect all projects and services that occur in an area.
System performance measures are also used in the State of Utah Strategic Plan on Homelessness to help
the state and LHCCs understand trends and shift priorities to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-
recurring. The graphic on page 8 shows the HUD system performance measures that have been identified
as particularly significant in considering homeless services in Utah. This report covers the Federal Fiscal
Year (FFY) time-period of October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019. This year’s report includes system
performance measure data at the state, CoC, and LHCC level.
Use of system performance measures:
• The system performance measures are meant to be utilized by the CoC as a whole, not by individual
projects, organizations, or LHCCs. Therefore, generating the system performance measures data by
a smaller subset of a CoC can cause errors, resulting in no information or ‘N/A’ to be displayed for a
field. Missing data often occurs in the LHCC sections of the report because LHCCs simply do not have
relevant data within the area.
8
• To improve data quality, HUD allows homeless service providers to back-date or change data entered
into HMIS. Backdating may cause the information to change for a given time period after it has initially
been reported. The data presented in this report has been updated from what was reported to HUD to
accurately reflect ongoing data correction and updated report logic by HUD. All system performance
measures data presented in this report was pulled in June and July 2020 and is accurate to HMIS at that
time; additional correction may occur, and numbers may vary if reports are pulled again.
• The Strategic Plan has highlighted the need to look more closely at data by LHCC to strengthen local
response efforts. LHCC data is only available for federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019, as this is the first
year this report has included system performance measures data for these areas.
MEASURE 1: LENGTH OF TIME (LOT) PERSONS REMAIN HOMELESS
This measure looks at all Emergency Shelter projects and finds the average and median days that a
person was homeless in any Emergency Shelter projects in the area during the reporting period.
2 MEASURE 2: THE EXTENT TO WHICH PERSONS WHO EXIT HOMELESSNESS TO

PERMANENT HOUSING DESTINATIONS RETURN TO HOMELESSNESS
This measure evaluates how many people exited homelessness 24 months before the reporting period,
then calculates how many returned to homelessness at different intervals.
3 MEASURE 3: NUMBER OF HOMELESS PERSONS Job and

income growth Number of
for homeless homeless
This measure represents an unduplicated persons persons
count of people in Emergency Shelter and
Transitional Housing projects during the Number
reporting period. of persons
homeless
for the
first
time
HUD SYSTEM
Successful
PERFORMANCE placement
in
permanent
MEASURES housing
Length of
episode Return to
homelessness
Homeless
prevention/
placement
9
4 MEASURE 4: EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME GROWTH FOR HOMELESS PERSONS IN

COC PROGRAM-FUNDED PROJECTS
This measure shows the number of persons in CoC-funded programs who increased income during the
federal fiscal year 2019.
• System performance measure 4 divides its results into Stayers and Leavers. Stayers are people not
exited from the project during the reporting period and who have been in the project at least 365
days. Leavers are people who have exited the project.
• CoC programs are programs funded through the CoC competition with HUD.
5 MEASURE 5: NUMBER OF PERSONS WHO BECOME HOMELESS FOR THE FIRST TIME
This measure counts the number of people experiencing homelessness for the first time in the reporting
period.
• The measure includes all Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing, and Permanent Housing projects’
enrollment start dates during the reporting period. The measure then looks back 24 months to see if
the client was in another Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing, and Permanent Housing project
during that time, if they did not, they are considered first-time homeless.
6 MEASURE 6: HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND HOUSING PLACEMENT OF PERSONS

This measure is not applicable to any CoC in the country.
7 MEASURE 7: SUCCESSFUL HOUSING PLACEMENT
This measure looks at people who retained Permanent Housing or exited to a permanent housing
destination during the reporting period.
More information regarding the system performance measures can be found at:
www.hudexchange.info/trainings/system-performance-measures/
10
HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT (HIC)

On January 22, 2020, each of Utah’s Continua of Care carried out the HUD-mandated Housing Inventory
Count (HIC). The Housing Inventory Count compares the number of individuals spending the night in
various homeless services programs to the number of beds available in those programs on a specific
night. It also reports the number of these beds dedicated to specific subpopulations, including veterans,
survivors of domestic violence, individuals with HIV or AIDS, and youth. The HIC enables communities to
generate a snapshot of their homeless service system’s capacity and the extent to which those resources
are being utilized.
The count includes the number of beds and units available on the night of the Point-in-Time Count,
including domestic violence providers, in these types of shelter:
• Emergency Shelter
• Transitional Housing
• Permanent Supportive Housing
• Rapid Re-Housing
• Other Permanent Housing
For more information on the Housing Inventory Count, please see “Utah’s Approach to Homelessness” at
housing.utah.gov.
POINT-IN-TIME COUNT (PIT)

On January 22, 2020, each of Utah’s Continua of Care carried out the HUD-mandated Point-in-Time Count
(PIT). The PIT is a massive effort that takes place throughout the U.S to count everyone who meets the
HUD definition of literal homelessness in a geographic area on a single night. Literal
homelessness is defined as staying in an Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing, or
a place not meant for human habitation (such as in a vehicle or a city park). Many
factors influence the results of any given PIT, including weather, volunteer effort,
CoC organization, and planning. Regardless, the PIT is a useful tool in calculating
a community’s need for homeless services on any given night. It is also one of the
only tools available for measuring the number of homeless individuals who are not
enrolled in homeless service programs.
In 2020, the Utah PIT showed an increase in the number of people spending the night in places not meant
for human habitation, commonly referred to as unsheltered. The increase was influenced by improved
and expanded coordination and participation in the PIT by Local Homeless Coordinating Committees
across the state, which allowed for more thorough and broad coverage than was achieved in the past. For
example, some counties participated in the unsheltered homelessness count for the first time in multiple
11
years. Additional coordination and participation make it difficult to determine how much of the increase
in the PIT is a genuine increase in the number of people experiencing homelessness on a given night and
how much is simply a more accurate representation of existing homelessness in Utah.
For more information on the PIT, please see Utah’s Approach to Homelessness.
ES = Emergency Shelter SO = Street Outreach

PH = Permanent Housing TH = Transitional Housing
RRH = Rapid Re-Housing
12
STATE OF UTAH
Measure 1.a looks at all Emergency Shelter projects and finds the average and median days that a person
was homeless in any Emergency Shelter projects in the area during the reporting period.
Average and Median Length of Time Homeless
64.2 62.4
62.1
Average nights in ES and TH
Average nights in ES
55.85 54.5 55.4
Bed nights
22 23 23
Median nights in ES and TH
Median nights in ES
20 20 21
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

Percentage of Total Returns to Homelessness

Percent of Returns
34.7% 33.7%
32.1%
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

13
3 MEASURE 3: NUMBER OF HOMELESS PERSONS
This measure counts all people enrolled in Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing projects during
the reporting period.
13,655 13,570
12,847
Unduplicated Total Sheltered
Homeless Persons
13,244 13,155
12,526 Emergency Shelter Total
Number of Persons
Change in Annual
Counts of Sheltered
Homeless Persons
567
574 471
Transitional Housing Total
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

Increase of Total Income for CoC-Funded Programs
44.7%
Percentage of total
Metric 4.6 – System Leavers –

34.5% 34.2%
Increase of total income (Percentage)
population
33.7%
32.5%
30.9%
Metric 4.3 – System Stayers –
Increase of total income (Percentage)
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

14
period.
Percentage of System Users that are

Experiencing Homelessness for the First Time
62.01% 60.80% 62.09%

Percent of total
Metric 5.2 – Persons entering ES,

system users
TH and PH projects for the first time

(Percentage)
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

This measure looks at people who retained permanent housing or exited to a Permanent Housing
Percentage of Successful Housing Outcomes
92% 93% 93%

% Successful exits or retention
of housing in PH projects except
PH-RRH (7b.2)
Percentage of Population
% Successful exits from ES, SH,

29% 28% 29%
TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus
persons in other PH projects
(non-Street Outreach) (7b.1)
3% 1.4% 3%
% Successful exits from Street
Outreach (7a.1)
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
15
2020 HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT

State of Utah
Project Type PIT Count Total Beds Utilization Rate

Emergency Shelter 2034 2563 79%
Non-Dedicated 1649 1909
Domestic Violence Dedicated 340 556
Youth Dedicated 45 98
Rapid Re-Housing 999 999 100%
Veteran Dedicated 87 87
Transitional Housing 393 550 71%
Non-Dedicated 79 99
Permanent Supportive Housing 2878 3085 93%
HIV/AIDS Dedicated 131 116
Other Permanent Housing 174 174 100%
Total 6478 7371 88%

16
2020 POINT-IN-TIME COUNT

POINT-IN-TIME COUNT SUMMARY
3,131
2,865 2,876 2,798 Individuals
Households
2,384
2,165 2,176 2,161
2017 2018 2019 2020
State of Utah
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 1766 410 2176 1769 392 2161 1745 639 2384
Total
Individuals 2456 420 2876 2390 408 2798 2427 704 3131
Households Households 286 1 287 259 1 260 283 7 290

of Adults and
Children Individuals 970 2 972 874 3 877 961 20 981
of Only
Without
17
HOMELESS SUBPOPULATIONS
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
State of Utah Total in as Percentage of
Sheltered Unsheltered
Subpopulation Subpopulation Total Individuals
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Survivors of Domestic Violence
566 656 56 70 622 726 22% 23%
(Adults and Minors)
300 325 56 70 356 395 13% 13%
(Adults Only)
Adults with HIV/AIDS 20 25 2 8 22 33 1% 1%
Adults with Substance Abuse
565 508 87 114 652 622 23% 20%
Disorders
Adults with Mental Illness 768 791 124 181 892 972 32% 31%
Veterans 184 98 27 16 211 114 8% 4%
Chronically Homeless Veterans 33 11 12 7 45 18 2% 1%
Chronically Homeless Persons
in Households of Adults and 19 41 0 4 19 45 1% 1%
Minors
Total Chronically Homeless
364 427 148 261 512 688 18% 22%
Persons
Unaccompanied Youth (Under
130 130 33 64 163 194 6% 6%
Age 24)
Youth Parent (Under Age 24) 19 29 0 2 19 31 1% 1%
Child of a Youth Parent 28 43 0 2 28 45 1% 1%
18
SALT LAKE COUNTY COC & LHCC

SALT LAKE VALLEY COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS
Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless

Persons
(bed nights) (bed nights)
FFY18-19 FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference Difference
1.1 Persons
8397 8878 8412 66.19 61.03 60.94 -0.09 27 23 22 -1
in ES
1.2
Persons in 8886 9352 8796 74.59 69.01 68.37 -0.64 31 26 24 -2
ES and TH

Persons who
Exited to a Returns to Returns to Returns to
Number of
Permanent Homelessness Homelessness Homelessness
Returns
Housing in Less than 6 from 6 to 12 from 13 to 24
in 2 Years
Destination Months Months Months
(2 Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
FFY17 FFY17 FFY17 FFY17 FFY17 FFY17
Returns Returns Returns Returns
Exit was from SO 33 19 57.58% 5 15.15% 3 9.09% 27 81.82%

19
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Destination Months Months Months
(2 Years Prior)
Exit was from ES 794 153 19.27% 122 15.37% 88 11.08% 363 45.72%
Exit was from TH 505 90 17.82% 48 9.50% 28 5.54% 166 32.87%
Exit was from SH* 9 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 5 55.56%
Exit was from PH 1229 259 21.07% 100 8.14% 92 7.49% 451 36.70%
TOTAL Returns to
2570 523 20.35% 277 10.78% 212 8.25% 1012 39.38%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 46 22 47.83% 5 10.87% 8 17.39% 35 76.09%
Exit was from ES 779 165 21.18% 76 9.76% 71 9.11% 312 40.05%
Exit was from TH 161 18 11.18% 7 4.35% 12 7.45% 37 22.98%
Exit was from PH 1880 527 28.03% 165 8.78% 138 7.34% 830 44.15%
TOTAL Returns to
2866 732 25.54% 253 8.83% 229 7.99% 1214 42.36%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 25 8 32% 5 20% 3 12% 16 64%
Exit was from ES 879 251 28.56% 78 8.87% 84 9.56% 413 46.99%
Exit was from TH 152 13 8.55% 11 7.24% 11 7.24% 35 23.03%
Exit was from PH 1377 298 21.64% 141 10.24% 108 7.92% 548 39.80%
TOTAL Returns to
2433 570 23.43% 235 9.66% 206 8.51% 1012 41.59%
Homelessness
*Safe Haven
20
METRIC 3.2 – CHANGE IN ANNUAL COUNTS
This measures the change in annual counts of sheltered homeless persons in HMIS.
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Unduplicated Total sheltered homeless

8994 9512 8963 -549
persons
Emergency Shelter Total 9658 9165 8709 -456
Transitional Housing Total 399 432 375 -57

METRIC 4.3 – CHANGE IN TOTAL INCOME FOR ADULT SYSTEM STAYERS DURING THE REPORTING
PERIOD
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Number of adults (system stayers) 413 174 221 47
Number of adults with increased total

144 45 64 19
income
Percentage of adults who increased total
35% 26% 29% 3.10%
income
21
METRIC 4.6 – CHANGE IN TOTAL INCOME FOR ADULT SYSTEM LEAVERS
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Number of adults who exited (system
114 186 220 34
leavers)
Number of adults who exited with increased
44 40 69 29
total income
39% 22% 31% 9.86%
income
period.
METRIC 5.1 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES AND TH PROJECTS WITH NO
PRIOR ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Person with entries into ES or TH during the
8306 9133 8566 -567
reporting period.
Of persons above, count those who were in
ES, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to 3498 4220 3914 -306
their entry during the reporting year.
Number of persons experiencing
4808 4913 4652 -261
homelessness for the first time
Percent of first time homeless 57.89% 53.79% 54.31% 0.46%

22
METRIC 5.2 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, TH, AND PH PROJECTS WITH NO
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during
9643 10434 9868 -566
the reporting period
their entry during the reporting year
5414 5469 5389 -80
Percent of first time homeless 56.14% 52.42% 54.61% 4.19%

METRIC 7A.1 – CHANGE IN EXITS TO PERMANENT HOUSING DESTINATIONS
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons who exit Street Outreach 1279 1431 1364 -67
Of persons above, those who exited to
22 3 2 -1
temporary & some institutional destinations
Of the persons above, those who exited to

21 6 9 3
permanent housing destinations
Percent successful exits 3.36% 0.63% 0.81% 0.18%

23
METRIC 7B.1 – CHANGE IN EXITS TO PERMANENT HOUSING DESTINATIONS
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons in ES, TH and PH-RRH who exited,
plus persons in other PH projects who exited 7176 8404 7620 -784
without moving into housing
1257 1670 1589 -81
METRIC 7B.2 – CHANGE IN EXIT TO OR RETENTION OF PERMANENT HOUSING
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 2108 2171 2274 103
Of persons above, those who remained in
applicable PH projects and those who exited 1970 2051 2125 74
to permanent housing destinations
Percent successful exits/retention 93.45% 94.47% 93.45% -1.02%

Salt Lake County CoC & LHCC
PIT Total Utilization
Project Type
Count Beds Rate
Domestic Violence
145 203 PIT Total Utilization
Dedicated Project Type
Count Beds Rate
Permanent Supportive
2425 2515 96%
Rapid Re-Housing 509 509 100% Housing
Non-Dedicated 440 440 Non-Dedicated 1697 1766
Veteran Dedicated 50 50 HIV/AIDS Dedicated 122 107
Youth Dedicated 19 19 Veteran Dedicated 586 622
Transitional Housing 245 363 67% Youth Dedicated 20 20
Non-Dedicated 58 78 Other Permanent

145 145 100%
Housing
Domestic Violence
120 168
Dedicated Non-Dedicated 140 140
Veteran Dedicated 36 80 Veteran Dedicated 5 5
Youth Dedicated 31 37 Total 4769 5099 94%

24

POINT-IN-TIME SUMMARY
Salt Lake County CoC & LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 1224 135 1359 1274 185 1459 1240 247 1487
Total
Individuals 1668 136 1804 1651 193 1844 1690 268 1958

of Adults
and Children Individuals 620 0 620 526 0 526 634 0 634
of Only
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Salt Lake County CoC & LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
216 329 28 26 244 355 13% 18%
(Adults and Minors)
121 172 28 26 149 198 8% 10%
(Adults Only)
417 380 46 71 463 451 25% 23%
Disorders
25
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Salt Lake County CoC & LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 145 73 12 7 157 80 9% 4%
Minors
297 316 86 120 383 436 21% 22%
Persons
95 92 19 42 114 134 6% 7%
Age 24)
26
MOUNTAINLAND COC & LHCC

SUMMIT, UTAH AND WASATCH COUNTIES
Average LOT Median LOT Homeless

Persons
Homeless (bed nights) (bed nights)
FFY18-19 FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference Difference
1.1 Persons in
1194 907 643 9.16 9.84 8.31 -1.53 4 4 4 0
ES
1.2 Persons in
1211 923 667 17.89 22.78 25.89 3.11 4 4 4 0
ES and TH

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Destination (2 Months Months Months
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 1 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00%
Exit was from ES 398 102 25.63% 37 9.30% 38 9.55% 177 44.47%
27
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from TH 33 3 9.09% 0 0.00% 3 9.09% 6 18.18%
Exit was from PH 145 9 6.21% 2 1.38% 6 4.14% 17 11.72%
TOTAL Returns to
577 114 19.76% 40 6.93% 47 8.15% 201 34.84%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from ES 447 108 24.16% 38 8.50% 15 3.36% 161 36.02%
Exit was from TH 32 7 21.88% 3 9.38% 2 6.25% 12 37.50%
Exit was from PH 260 7 2.69% 16 6.15% 3 1.15% 26 10.00%
TOTAL Returns to
739 122 16.51% 57 7.71% 20 2.71% 199 26.93%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from ES 341 91 26.69% 13 3.81% 5 1.47% 109 31.96%
Exit was from TH 38 5 13.16% 2 5.26% 3 7.89% 10 26.32%
Exit was from PH 314 13 4.14% 12 3.82% 13 4.14% 38 12.10%
TOTAL Returns to
693 109 15.73% 27 3.90% 21 3.03% 157 22.66%
Homelessness
28
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
1236 939 678 -261
persons
Emergency Shelter Total 1219 923 655 -268
Transitional Housing Total 74 71 81 10

PERIOD
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Number of adults (system stayers) 46 55 63 8

25 32 35 3
income
54% 58% 56% -2.63%
income
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
57 61 49 -12
leavers)
39 28 29 1
total income
68% 46% 59% 13.28%
income
29
period.
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
1209 912 642 -270
reporting period.

969 703 478 -225
Percent of first time homeless 80.15% 77.08% 74.45% -3.41%
METRIC 5.2 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, TH AND PH PROJECTS WITH NO
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
1456 1161 873 -288
1177 892 628 -264

30

FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons who exit Street Outreach 85 67 140 73

0 5 10 5
0 5 9 4
Percent successful exits 0.00% 14.93% 13.57% -1.35%
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
plus persons in other PH projects who exited 1262 1016 743 -273
488 436 237 -199
Percent successful exits 38.67% 42.91% 31.90% -11.02%

31
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 250 209 205 -4
Of persons above, those who remained

in applicable PH projects and those who 217 189 191 2
exited to permanent housing destinations
Percent successful exits/retention 86.80% 90.43% 93.17% 2.74%

Mountainland CoC & LHCC

Non-Dedicated 10 21
Non-Dedicated 32 32
Non-Dedicated 21 21
Other Permanent Housing 29 29 100%
Non-Dedicated 29 29
Total 280 341 82%
32

POINT-IN-TIME SUMMARY
Mountainland CoC and LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 87 43 130 65 62 127 49 82 131
Total
Individuals 128 45 173 97 64 161 77 90 167
of Adults and
Households of Households 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Only Children Individuals 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Mountainland CoC
Total in as Percentage of
and LHCC Sheltered Unsheltered
Subpopulation Total Individuals
Subpopulation
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
39 47 8 10 62 57 39% 34%
(Adults and Minors)
18 22 8 10 37 32 23% 19%
(Adults Only)
17 18 11 11 28 29 17% 17%
Disorders
33
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Mountainland CoC
and LHCC Sheltered Unsheltered
Subpopulation
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 2 1 7 3 9 4 6% 2%
Minors
9 5 16 44 25 49 16% 29%
Persons
5 1 4 6 9 7 6% 4%
Age 24)
SUMMIT COUNTY
Summit County

Domestic Violence
12 26
Dedicated
Total 12 26 46%
34

Summit County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 6 0 6 11 0 11 7 6 13
Total
Individuals 11 0 11 15 0 15 12 6 18
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Summit County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
15 12 0 0 15 12 100% 67%
(Adults and Minors)
11 7 0 0 11 7 73% 39%
(Adults Only)
1 1 0 1 1 2 7% 11%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 0 1 0 1 0% 6%
35
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Summit County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Minors
0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 6%
Persons
0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 6%
Age 24)
UTAH COUNTY
Utah County

Non-Dedicated 10 21
Non-Dedicated 21 21
Other Supportive Housing 29 29 100%
Non-Dedicated 29 29
Total 268 315 85%
36

Utah County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 81 43 124 54 62 116 42 75 117
Total
Individuals 117 45 162 82 64 146 65 83 148
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Utah County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
39 35 8 10 47 45 32% 30%
(Adults and Minors)
18 15 8 10 26 25 18% 17%
(Adults Only)
16 17 11 10 27 27 18% 18%
Disorders
37
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Utah County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 2 1 7 2 9 3 6% 2%
Minors
9 4 16 44 25 48 17% 32%
Persons
5 0 4 6 9 6 6% 4%
Age 24)
WASATCH COUNTY
No housing inventory count for Wasatch County.
38

Wasatch County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total
Individuals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
of Adults and
of Only
Without
No homeless subpopulation data for Wasatch County.

39
BALANCE OF STATE COC

Average LOT Median LOT Homeless

Persons
Homeless (bed nights) (bed nights)
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 FFY17 FFY18 FFY19 Difference FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
1.1 Persons in
3686 3548 3649 37.29 40.46 41.54 1.08 15 19 20 1
ES
1.2 Persons in
3763 3619 3713 40.5 43.74 43.94 0.2 16 20 21 1
ES and TH

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 13 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 1 7.69%
Exit was from ES 998 196 19.64% 70 7.01% 71 7.11% 337 33.77%
Exit was from TH 35 0 0.00% 4 11.43% 0 0.00% 4 11.43%

40
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
Exit was from PH 754 14 1.86% 21 2.79% 41 5.44% 76 10.08%
TOTAL Returns to
1800 210 11.67% 95 5.28% 113 6.28% 418 23.22%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 15 5 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 33.33%
Exit was from ES 742 99 13.34% 39 5.26% 81 10.92% 219 29.51%
Exit was from TH 28 0 0.00% 1 3.57% 1 3.57% 2 7.14%
Exit was from PH 818 28 3.42% 28 3.42% 61 7.46% 117 14.30%
TOTAL Returns to
1603 132 8.23% 68 4.24% 143 8.92% 343 21.40%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 11 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 3 27.27%
Exit was from ES 1190 216 18.15% 80 6.72% 80 6.72% 376 31.60%
Exit was from TH 37 1 2.70% 1 2.70% 6 16.22% 8 21.62%
Exit was from PH 965 46 4.77% 36 3.73% 59 6.11% 141 14.61%
TOTAL Returns to
2203 264 11.98% 117 5.31% 147 6.67% 528 23.97%
Homelessness
41
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference

3859 3721 3839 118
persons
Emergency Shelter Total 3796 3662 3785 123

Transitional Housing Total 79 71 68 -3

PERIOD
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Number of adults (system stayers) 40 58 35 -23

1 22 17 -5
income

3% 38% 49% 10.64%
income

42
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference

168 135 147 12
leavers)

63 56 45 -11
total income

38% 41% 31% -10.87%
income
period.
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
3622 3478 3635 157
reporting period.
ES, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to 902 1262 1326 64

2720 2216 2309 93

43
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
4596 4301 4500 199
ES, TH or any PH within 24 months prior to 1035 1388 1488 100
3561 2913 3012 99

FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons who exit Street Outreach 50 289 255 -34
5 5 19 14
7 1 2 1
44
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
plus persons in other PH projects who exited 4034 3818 4088 270
1730 1563 1737 174
FFY18-19
FFY17 FFY18 FFY19
Difference
Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 246 228 232 4
Of persons above, those who remained in

applicable PH projects and those who exited 211 196 204 8
to permanent housing destinations
Percent successful exits/retention 85.77% 85.96% 87.93% 1.97%

Balance of State CoC

45

311 415 75%
Housing
Total 1429 1931 74%


2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Category
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Total
Total
Total
Households 455 232 687 430 145 575 456 310 766
Total
Individuals 660 239 899 642 151 793 660 346 1006
of Adults
of Only
Without
46
Number of Persons
Balance of State CoC Subpopulation
Subpopulation Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
296 280 20 34 316 314 40% 31%
(Adults and Minors)
150 131 20 34 170 165 21% 16%
(Adults Only)
131 110 30 32 161 142 20% 14%
Disorders
Veterans 37 24 8 6 45 30 6% 3%
Minors
58 106 46 97 104 203 13% 20%
Persons
30 37 10 16 40 53 5% 5%
Age 24)
47
BEAR RIVER LHCC

BOX ELDER, CACHE AND RICH COUNTIES
Individual county data for Box Elder and Cache Counties are in the following section.
Rich County had no data to report.
No data to report for Measure 1.a. See page 7 for more information.

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit Was from PH 76 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
TOTAL Returns to
76 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit Was from PH 69 1 1.45% 1 1.45% 4 5.80% 6 8.70%
TOTAL Returns to
69 1 1.45% 1 1.45% 4 5.80% 6 8.70%
Homelessness
48
This measure is a count of all people enrolled in Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing projects
during the reporting period.
No data to report for Measure 3. See page 7 for more information.

This measure shows the number of persons in CoC-funded programs who increased income during FFY19.
This measure counts the number of people who are experiencing homelessness for the first time in the
reporting period.
No data to report for Metric 5.1. See page 7 for more information.
FFY18 FFY19 Difference
Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting period. 84 91 7
Of persons above, those who were in ES, TH or any PH within 24 months

2 11 9
prior to their entry during the reporting year.
Number of persons experiencing homelessness for the first time. 82 80 -2

49

No data to report for Metric 7a.1 or 7b.2. See page 7 for more information.
Persons in ES, TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus persons in other PH

124 59 -65
projects who exited without moving into housing
Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing

108 29 -79
destinations
Percent successful exits 87.10% 49.15% -37.94%

Bear River LHCC
Utilization
Project Type PIT Count Total Beds
Rate
Non-Dedicated 24 24
Total 131 182 72%

50

Bear River LHCC

2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 27 4 31 23 4 27 21 38 59
Total
Individuals 79 5 84 61 4 65 63 56 119
of Adults
of Only
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Bear River LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Subpopulation Sheltered Unsheltered
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
61 63 0 4 61 67 94% 56%
(Adults and Minors)
23 21 0 4 23 25 35% 21%
(Adults Only)
5 2 0 1 5 3 8% 3%
Disorders
51
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Bear River LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 0 1 0 1 0% 1%
Minors
Chronically Homeless Persons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
1 0 0 1 1 1 13% 8%
Age 24)
BOX ELDER COUNTY

Box Elder County
Project Type
Count Beds Rate
Total 8 18 44%
52

Box Elder County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 5 0 5 6 0 6 2 3 5
Total
Individuals 17 0 17 8 0 8 8 4 12
of Adults and
of Only
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Box Elder County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
8 8 0 2 8 10 100% 83%
(Adults and Minors)
6 2 0 2 6 4 75% 33%
(Adults Only)
4 1 0 0 4 1 50% 8%
Disorders
53
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Box Elder County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Minors
2 0 1 4 3 4 5% 3%
Age 24)
CACHE COUNTY
Cache County
Project Type
Count Beds Rate
Non-Dedicated 24 24
Total 123 164 75%

54

Cache County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 22 4 26 17 4 21 19 35 54
Total
Individuals 62 5 67 53 4 57 55 52 107
of Adults and
of Only
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Cache County Total in as Percentage of
Subpopulation Sheltered Unsheltered
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
53 55 0 2 53 57 93% 53%
(Adults and Minors)
17 19 0 2 17 21 30% 20%
(Adults Only)
1 1 0 1 1 2 2% 2%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 0 1 0 1 0% 1%
55
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Cache County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Minors
1 0 1 3 2 3 4% 3%
Age 24)
56
CARBON-EMERY LHCC
CARBON AND EMERY COUNTIES
All Carbon-Emery LHCC data is for Carbon County. Emery County has no data to report.

Persons
FFY18 FFY19 FFY18 FFY19 Difference FFY18 FFY19 Difference
1.1 Persons in ES N/A 5 N/A 9.6 N/A N/A 4 N/A
1.2 Persons in ES and TH N/A 5 N/A 9.6 N/A N/A 4 N/A

then calculates how many returned to homelessness at different intervals
Persons who
Number of
FFY18 Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 13 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 23.08%
TOTAL Returns to
13 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 23.08%
Homelessness
57
Persons who
Number of
FFY19 Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 9 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 2 22.22%
TOTAL Returns to
9 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 2 22.22%
Homelessness
This measure is a count of all people enrolled in Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing projects
during the reporting period.

Unduplicated Total Sheltered Homeless Persons 0 5 5
Emergency Shelter Total N/A 5 N/A

This measure shows the number of persons in CoC-funded programs who increased income during FFY19.

58
This measure counts the number of people who are experiencing homelessness for the first time in the
reporting period.
METRIC 5.1 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, AND TH PROJECTS WITH NO
Person with entries into ES or TH during the reporting period. 0 5 5
Of persons above, count those who were in ES, TH or any PH within 24

N/A 1 N/A
months prior to their entry during the reporting year.
Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, TH or PH in
the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness N/A 4 N/A
for the first time)
Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting period. 73 28 -45

5 4 -1
the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness 68 24 -44
for the first time.)

59

Universe: Persons who exit Street Outreach 27 27 0
Of persons above, those who exited to temporary and some institutional
5 2 -3
destinations
1 8 7
destinations
Percent successful exits 22.22% 37.04% 14.81%


Universe: Persons in ES, TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus persons in other
36 44 8
PH projects who exited without moving into housing
19 27 8
destinations
No data to report for Metric 7b.2. See page 7 for more information.

Carbon-Emery LHCC & Carbon County
Domestic Violence
0 13
Dedicated
Non-Dedicated 17 17
Total 17 30 57%
60

POINT-IN-TIME COUNTY SUMMARY
Carbon-Emery LHCC & Carbon County

2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 1 5 6 2 6 8 0 13 13
Total
Individuals 3 6 9 2 6 8 0 13 13
of Adults and
of Only
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Carbon-Emery LHCC & Carbon Total in as Percentage of
County Subpopulation Subpopulation Total Individuals
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
2 0 0 3 2 3 25% 23%
(Adults and Minors)
2 0 0 3 2 3 25% 23%
(Adults Only)
2 0 1 5 3 5 38% 38%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
61
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Carbon-Emery LHCC & Carbon Total in as Percentage of
County Subpopulation Subpopulation Total Individuals
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Minors
0 0 0 5 0 5 0% 38%
Persons
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Age 24)
62
DAVIS LHCC
MEASURE 1: LENGTH OF TIME (LOT) PERSONS REMAIN HOMELESSNESS

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from PH 109 7 6.42% 4 3.67% 6 5.50% 17 15.60%
TOTAL Returns to
109 7 6.42% 4 3.67% 6 5.50% 17 15.60%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from PH 146 7 4.79% 7 4.79% 14 9.59% 28 19.18%
TOTAL Returns to
146 7 4.79% 7 4.79% 14 9.59% 28 19.18%
Homelessness
63

PERIOD

Number of adults (system stayers) 2 N/A N/A
Number of adults with increased total income 0 N/A N/A
Percentage of adults who increased total income 0% N/A N/A

Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 39 N/A N/A
Number of adults who exited with increased total income 11 N/A N/A
Percentage of adults who increased total income 28% N/A N/A
period.
No data to report for Metric 5.1. See page 7 for more information.
64
Of persons above, count those who were in ES, TH or any PH

51 31 -20
within 24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year.
Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES,
TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons 135 97 -38
experiencing homelessness for the first time.)

No data to report for Metric 7a.1 and 7b.2. See page 7 for more information.

Persons in ES, TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus persons in other
108 44 -64
PH projects who exited without moving into housing
60 27 -33
destinations

65

Davis LHCC

Non-Dedicated 1 1
Non-Dedicated 56 56
Total 108 125 86%

Davis LHCC PIT

2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category Sheltered
Total
Total
Total
Households 26 9 35 16 15 31 21 25 46
Total
Individuals 54 9 63 44 17 61 52 30 82
of Adults
of Only
Without
66
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Davis LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
44 52 5 4 49 56 80% 68%
(Adults and Minors)
17 21 5 4 22 25 36% 30%
(Adults Only)
5 5 2 2 7 7 11% 9%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 1 0 1 0 2% 0%
Minors
1 14 5 1 6 15 10% 18%
Persons
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Age 24)
67
GRAND LHCC
No data to report for Measures 1-7. See page Y for more information.
Grand LHCC
Utilization
Rate
Non-Dedicated 2 2
Total 3 10 30%

Grand LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 4 11 15 5 0 5 3 9 12
Total
Individuals 7 12 19 7 0 7 3 9 12
of Adults and
Without
68
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Grand LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
7 1 0 2 7 3 100% 25%
(Adults and Minors)
6 1 0 2 6 3 86% 25%
(Adults Only)
2 2 0 1 2 3 29% 25%
Disorders
Veterans 0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 8%
Minors
0 3 0 4 0 7 0% 58%
Persons
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Age 24)
69
IRON LHCC
BEAVER, GARFIELD, IRON AND KANE COUNTIES
All Iron County LHCC data is for Iron County. Beaver, Garfield and Kane Counties have no data to report.

Persons
1.1 Persons in ES 485 443 13.81 61.12 47.31 9 12 3
1.2 Persons in ES
486 443 13.78 61.12 47.34 9 12 3
and TH


70
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 226 26 11.50% 12 5.31% 20 8.85% 58 25.66%
Exit was from PH 56 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 7.14% 4 7.14%
TOTAL Returns to
282 26 9.22% 12 4.26% 24 8.51% 62 21.99%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from ES 223 18 8.07% 10 4.48% 19 8.52% 47 21.08%
Exit was from PH 72 1 1.39% 1 1.39% 1 1.39% 3 4.17%
TOTAL Returns to
295 19 6.44% 11 3.73% 20 6.78% 50 16.95%
Homelessness
Unduplicated Total sheltered homeless persons 503 461 -42
Emergency Shelter Total 503 461 -42

71

No data to report for Measures 4. See page 7 for more information.
period.
METRIC 5.1 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, AND TH PROJECTS WITH NO
Person with entries into ES or TH during the reporting period. 479 452 -27
Of persons above, count those who were in ES, TH or any PH within

148 152 4
24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year.
Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, TH or
PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing 331 300 -31
homelessness for the first time)
METRIC 5.2 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, TH, AND PH PROJECTS WITH NO PRIOR
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS
Of persons above, count those who were in ES, TH or any PH within

148 152 4
24 months prior to their entry during the reporting year.
Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, TH or
PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing 362 318 -44
homelessness for the first time.)
72

No data to report for Metric 7a.1. See page 7 for more information.

493 461 -32

199 295 96
destinations
Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 2 3 1
Of persons above, those who remained in applicable PH projects and

2 3 1
those who exited to permanent housing destinations
Percent successful exits/retention 100.00% 100.00% 0.00%

73
Iron LHCC

Non-Dedicated 21 39
Domestic Violence
23 25
Dedicated
Non-Dedicated 9 9
Total 53 73 73%

Iron LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 24 9 33 21 0 21 29 23 52
Total
Individuals 32 10 42 30 0 30 44 24 68
of Adults and
Without
74
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Iron LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
21 23 0 1 21 24 70% 35%
(Adults and Minors)
12 11 0 1 12 12 40% 18%
(Adults Only)
6 6 0 1 6 7 20% 10%
Disorders
Veterans 1 4 0 1 1 5 3% 7%
Minors
1 0 0 0 1 0 3% 0%
Persons
2 2 0 2 2 4 7% 6%
Age 24)
75
SAN JUAN LHCC

No data to report for Measures 1-7. See page 7 for more information.

No housing inventory data available for San Juan LHCC.

San Juan
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
Individuals 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
of Adults and
Without
No homeless subpopulation data to report for San Juan LHCC.

76
SIX COUNTY LHCC

JUAB, MILLARD, SANPETE, PIUTE, SEVIER
AND WAYNE COUNTIES
Individual county data for Sanpete and Sevier Counties are in the following sections. Juab, Millard, Piute
and Wayne Counties had no data to report.

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from PH 75 0 0.00% 2 2.67% 0 0.00% 2 2.67%
TOTAL Returns to
75 0 0.00% 2 2.67% 0 0.00% 2 2.67%
Homelessness
77

period.


78

Six County LHCC

Non-Dedicated 2 2
Total 41 67 61%

Six County LHCC

2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 14 0 14 23 0 23 19 1 20
Total
Individuals 28 0 28 50 0 50 41 1 42
of Adults and
of Only
Without
79
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Six County LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
50 39 0 0 50 39 100% 93%
(Adults and Minors)
23 18 0 0 23 18 46% 43%
(Adults Only)
12 10 0 0 12 10 24% 24%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Minors
0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 2%
Persons
1 0 0 0 1 0 2% 0%
Age 24)
80
SANPETE COUNTY
No housing inventory data for Sanpete County.

Sanpete County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total
Individuals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
of Adults and
of Only
Without
No homeless subpopulations data for Sanpete County.

81
SEVIER COUNTY
Sevier County

Non-Dedicated 2 2
Total 41 67 61%

Sevier County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 14 0 14 23 0 23 19 0 19
Total
Individuals 28 0 28 50 0 50 41 0 41
of Adults and
of Only
Without
82
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Sevier County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Surviviors of Domestic Violence
50 39 0 0 50 39 100% 95%
(Adults and Minors)
Surviviors of Domestic Violence
23 18 0 0 23 18 46% 44%
(Adults Only)
12 10 0 0 12 10 24% 24%
Disorders
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Minors
0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 2%
Persons
1 0 0 0 1 0 2% 0%
Age 24)
83
TOOELE LHCC

Total # of
Persons who
Returns to Returns to Returns to
Exited to a Number of
Homelessness Homelessness Homelessness
Permanent Returns
in Less than 6 from 6 to 12 from 13 to 24
Housing in 2 Years
Months Months Months
Destination (2
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from PH 77 1 1.30% 1 1.30% 0 0.00% 2 2.60%
TOTAL Returns to
77 1 1.30% 1 1.30% 0 0.00% 2 2.60%
Homelessness
84
Total # of
Persons who
Returns to Returns to Returns to
Exited to a Number of
Homelessness Homelessness Homelessness
Permanent Returns
in Less than 6 from 6 to 12 from 13 to 24
Housing in 2 Years
Months Months Months
Destination (2
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from PH 202 11 5.45% 7 3.47% 23 11.39% 41 20.30%
TOTAL Returns to
202 11 5.45% 7 3.47% 23 11.39% 41 20.30%
Homelessness

PERIOD

Number of adults (system stayers) 16 5 -11
Number of adults with increased total income 6 3 -3
Percentage of adults who increased total income 38% 60% 22.50%
85

Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 15 17 2
Number of adults who exited with increased total income 4 4 0
Percentage of adults who increased total income 27% 24% -3.14%
period.
No data to report for Metric 5.1. See page 7 for more information

Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting 206 165 -41
period.
Of persons above, count those who were in ES, TH or any PH 32 35 3
Of persons above, count those who did not have entries in ES, 174 130 -44
TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons


86
No data to report for Metric 7a.1. See page 7 for more information.

251 157 -94
224 145 -79
destinations

Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 43 37 -6

43 35 -8
Percent successful exits/retention 100.00% 94.59% -5.41%
Tooele LHCC

Domestic Violence
8 14
Dedicated
Non-Dedicated 3 3
21 68 31%
Housing
Non-Dedicated 21 68
Total 32 85 38%
87

Tooele LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 6 7 13 6 12 18 5 9 14
Total
Individuals 10 7 17 13 13 26 8 9 17
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Tooele LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
13 8 2 1 15 9 58% 53%
(Adults and Minors)
6 5 2 1 8 6 31% 35%
(Adults Only)
2 1 0 1 2 2 8% 12%
Disorders
88
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Tooele LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 2 0 2 0 8% 0%
Minors
0 8 4 3 4 11 15% 65%
Persons
0 1 0 0 0 1 0% 6%
Age 24)
89
UINTAH BASIN LHCC

DAGGETT, DUCHESNE AND UINTAH COUNTIES
Individual county data for Duchesne and Uintah Counties are in the following sections. Daggett County
had no data to report.

Persons
1.1 Persons in ES 49 60 3.73 65.67 61.94 3 4.5 1.5
1.2 Persons in ES and

60 66 68.65 98.3 29.65 3 5 2
TH


90
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from ES 14 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 1 7.14% 2 14.29%
Exit was from TH 3 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Exit was from PH 69 3 4.35% 0 0.00% 2 2.90% 5 7.25%
TOTAL Returns to
86 4 4.65% 0 0.00% 3 3.49% 7 8.14%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from ES 32 7 21.88% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 9 28.13%
Exit was from TH 6 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Exit was from PH 53 1 1.89% 0 0.00% 2 3.77% 3 5.66%
TOTAL Returns to
91 8 8.79% 2 2.20% 2 2.20% 12 13.19%
Homelessness

Unduplicated Total sheltered homeless persons 60 67 7
Emergency Shelter Total 49 61 12
Transitional Housing Total 14 6 -8
91

No data to report for Measures 4. See page 7 for more information.
period.
METRIC 5.1 – CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PERSONS ENTERING ES, AND TH PROJECTS WITH NO PRIOR
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS

10 5 -5
the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness 44 57 13
for the first time)
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS
Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting period. 121 131 10

13 12 -1
the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons experiencing homelessness 108 119 11
for the first time.)
92

No data to report for Metric 7a.1 and 7.b2. See page 7 for more information.
Universe: Persons in ES, TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus persons in other PH
117 116 -1
Of the persons above, those who exited to permanent housing destinations 107 86 -21
Percent successful exits 91.45% 74.14% -17.32%
Uintah Basin LHCC

Utilization
Rate
Non-Dedicated 9 28
Non-Dedicated 32 32
Non-Dedicated 3 5
Total 45 85 53%
93

Uintah Basin LHCC

2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 12 5 17 9 1 10 10 6 16
Total
Individuals 17 6 23 16 1 17 13 7 20
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Uintah Basin LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
10 4 0 0 10 4 59% 20%
(Adults and Minors)
6 4 0 0 6 4 35% 20%
(Adults Only)
1 3 0 0 1 3 6% 15%
Disorders
94
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Uintah Basin LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Chronically Homeless Persons in
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Households of Adults and Minors
1 2 0 1 1 3 6% 15%
Persons
Unaccompanied Youth (Under Age
1 0 0 0 1 0 6% 0%
24)
DUCHESNE COUNTY
Duchesne County
Non-Dedicated 1 1
Non-Dedicated 32 32
Non-Dedicated 3 5
Total 36 38 95%
95

Duchesne County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 5 7
Total
Individuals 0 3 3 5 0 5 4 6 10
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Duchesne County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
2 1 0 0 2 1 40% 10%
(Adults and Minors)
2 1 0 0 2 1 40% 10%
(Adults Only)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
Disorders
96
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Duchesne County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
0 1 0 1 0 2 0% 20%
Persons
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
24)
UINTAH COUNTY
HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT
Uintah County

Non-Dedicated 8 27
Domestic Violence
1 20
Dedicated
Total 9 47 19%
97
POINT-IN-TIME COUNT
Uintah County
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 12 3 15 7 1 8 8 1 9
Total
Individuals 17 3 20 11 1 12 9 1 10
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Uintah County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
8 3 0 0 8 3 67% 30%
(Adults and Minors)
4 3 0 0 4 3 33% 30%
(Adults Only)
1 3 0 0 1 3 8% 30%
Disorders
98
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Uintah County Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%
1 1 0 0 1 1 8% 10%
Persons
1 0 0 0 1 0 8% 0%
24)
99
WASHINGTON LHCC

Persons
1.1 Persons in ES 892 629 28.51 69.75 41.24 14 18 4

894 931 28.46 69.9 41.44 14 18 4
TH

Persons who
Number of
FFY18 Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
FFY18 FFY18 FFY18 FFY18 FFY18
Exit was from ES 199 21 10.55% 11 5.53% 31 15.58% 63 31.66%
Exit was from PH 280 4 1.43% 11 3.93% 39 13.93% 54 19.29%
TOTAL Returns to
479 25 5.22% 22 4.59% 70 14.61% 117 24.43%
Homelessness
100
Persons who
Number of
FFY19 Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
FFY19 FFY19 FFY19 FFY19 FFY19
Exit was from ES 239 32 13.39% 21 8.79% 19 7.95% 72 30.13%
Exit was from PH 136 9 6.62% 7 5.15% 5 3.68% 21 15.44%
TOTAL Returns to
375 41 10.93% 28 7.47% 24 6.40% 93 24.80%
Homelessness


METRIC 4.3 – CHANGE IN TOTAL INCOME FOR ADULT SYSTEM STAYERS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD

Number of adults (system stayers) 4 5 1
Number of adults with increased total income 2 5 3
101

Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 28 21 -7
Number of adults who exited with increased total income 19 11 -8
Percentage of adults who increased total income 68% 52% -15.48%
period.
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS

253 254 1
TH or PH in the previous 24 months. (i.e. Number of persons 637 712 75
experiencing homelessness for the first time)
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS

Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting
1048 1092 44
period.

292 270 -22

102
No data to report for Metric 7a.1 and 7.b2. See page 7 for more information.

Persons in ES, SH, TH and PH-RRH who exited, plus persons in
1006 1006 0
other PH projects who exited without moving into housing
379 411 32
destinations
% Successful exits 37.67% 40.85% 3.18%

Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 52 42 -10
Of persons above, those who remained in applicable PH projects

45 32 -13
and those who exited to permanent housing destinations
% Successful exits/retention 86.54% 76.19% -10.35%

Washington LHCC

Non-Dedicated 22 22
Total 273 318 86%
103

Washington LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 71 153 224 60 66 126 76 113 189
Total
Individuals 91 154 245 73 69 142 102 120 222
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Washington LHCC Sheltered Unsheltered
Subpopulation
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
13 31 5 12 18 43 13% 19%
(Adults and Minors)
9 14 5 12 14 26 10% 12%
(Adults Only)
21 23 17 9 38 32 27% 14%
Disorders
104
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Washington LHCC Sheltered Unsheltered
Subpopulation
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 5 1 2 3 7 4 5% 2%
Minors
7 15 17 39 24 54 17% 24%
Persons
6 13 8 6 14 19 10% 9%
Age 24)
105
WEBER-MORGAN LHCC
WEBER AND MORGAN COUNTIES
All Weber-Morgan LHCC data is for Weber County. Morgan County has no data to report.

Persons
1.1 Persons in ES 2219 2311 49.91 125.1 75.19 27 43 16

2277 2369 53.34 126.45 73.11 28 44 16
TH

Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 2 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00%
Exit was from ES 306 51 16.67% 16 5.23% 30 9.80% 97 31.70%

106
Persons who
Number of
Returns
in 2 Years
Years Prior)
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from TH 25 0 0.00% 1 4.00% 1 4.00% 2 8.00%
Exit was from PH 210 15 7.14% 13 6.19% 12 5.71% 40 19.05%
TOTAL Returns to
543 68 12.52% 30 5.52% 43 7.92% 141 25.97%
Homelessness
% of % of % of % of
Exit was from SO 2 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00%
Exit was from ES 306 51 16.67% 16 5.23% 30 9.80% 97 31.70%
Exit was from TH 25 0 0.00% 1 4.00% 1 4.00% 2 8.00%
Exit was from PH 210 15 7.14% 13 6.19% 12 5.71% 40 19.05%
TOTAL Returns to
543 68 12.52% 30 5.52% 43 7.92% 141 25.97%
Homelessness

Transitional Housing Total 57 62 5
107

METRIC 4.3 – CHANGE IN TOTAL INCOME FOR ADULT SYSTEM STAYERS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD

Number of adults (system stayers) 32 23 -9
Number of adults with increased total income 32 23 -9
Percentage of adults who increased total income 14 8 -6
Number of adults who exited (system leavers) 53 43 -10
Number of adults who exited with increased total income 23 22 -1
period.
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS

950 1012 62
experiencing homelessness for the first time)
108
ENROLLMENTS IN HMIS

Person with entries into ES, TH or PH during the reporting
2417 2514 97
period.

1016 1091 75


Persons who exit Street Outreach 262 228 -34
Of persons above, those who exited to temporary & some institutional
0 217 217
destinations
0 11 11
destinations
% Successful exits 0.00% 100.00% 100.00%

2052 2175 123

715 665 -50
destinations
% Successful exits 34.84% 30.57% -4.27%
109
Persons in all PH projects except PH-RRH 131 148 17

106 132 26
% Successful exits/retention 80.92% 89.19% 8.27%
Weber-Morgan LHCC & Weber County

Non-Dedicated 80 80
255 311 82%
Housing
Total 726 956 76%
110

Weber-Morgan LHCC
2018 2019 2020
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Sheltered
Category
Total
Total
Total
Households 269 29 298 265 41 306 272 73 345
Total
Individuals 338 30 376 346 41 387 334 77 411
of Adults and
Without
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Weber-Morgan LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
75 59 8 7 83 66 21% 16%
(Adults and Minors)
46 36 8 7 54 43 14% 10%
(Adults Only)
75 58 10 12 85 70 22% 17%
Disorders
111
Number of Persons
Subpopulation
Weber-Morgan LHCC Total in as Percentage of
Counted
2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020
Veterans 31 18 3 1 34 19 9% 5%
0 4 0 4 0 8 0% 2%
47 61 20 38 67 99 17% 24%
Persons
18 21 1 4 19 25 5% 6%
Age 24)
State of Utah
Annual Report on
HOMELESSNESS
2020
WORKFORCE
WORKFORCE
SERVICES
SERVICES
HOUSING & COMMUNITY
HOUSING & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT

Annual Report On Homelessness 2020

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Annual Report On Homelessness 2020

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

State of Utah

Equal Opportunity Employer/Program • Auxiliary aids and services are available

DATA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

MAKING HOMELESSNESS RARE

MAKING HOMELESSNESS BRIEF

MAKING HOMELESSNESS NON-RECURRING

• Promote a community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness;

• Promote the utilization of mainstream programs and benefits; and

• Utilize data to redirect services, funding, and resources as necessary.

CARBON - • Summit County

DATA INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT

• All results for the area or measure were ‘0’.

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Use of system performance measures:

MEASURE 1: LENGTH OF TIME (LOT) PERSONS REMAIN HOMELESS

2 MEASURE 2: THE EXTENT TO WHICH PERSONS WHO EXIT HOMELESSNESS TO

3 MEASURE 3: NUMBER OF HOMELESS PERSONS Job and

4 MEASURE 4: EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME GROWTH FOR HOMELESS PERSONS IN

6 MEASURE 6: HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND HOUSING PLACEMENT OF PERSONS

7 MEASURE 7: SUCCESSFUL HOUSING PLACEMENT

HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT (HIC)

• Permanent Supportive Housing

• Other Permanent Housing

POINT-IN-TIME COUNT (PIT)

ES = Emergency Shelter SO = Street Outreach

MEASURE 1: LENGTH OF TIME (LOT) PERSONS REMAIN HOMELESS

Average and Median Length of Time Homeless

FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

2 MEASURE 2: THE EXTENT TO WHICH PERSONS WHO EXIT HOMELESSNESS TO

Percentage of Total Returns to Homelessness

FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

3 MEASURE 3: NUMBER OF HOMELESS PERSONS

FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

4 MEASURE 4: EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME GROWTH FOR HOMELESS PERSONS IN

Increase of Total Income for CoC-Funded Programs

Metric 4.6 – System Leavers –

FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

Percentage of System Users that are

62.01% 60.80% 62.09%

Metric 5.2 – Persons entering ES,

TH and PH projects for the first time

FFY17 FFY18 FFY19

6 MEASURE 6: HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND HOUSING PLACEMENT OF PERSONS

7 MEASURE 7: SUCCESSFUL HOUSING PLACEMENT

Percentage of Successful Housing Outcomes

92% 93% 93%

% Successful exits from ES, SH,

2020 HOUSING INVENTORY COUNT

Project Type PIT Count Total Beds Utilization Rate

ES = Emergency Shelter SO = Street Outreach

2020 POINT-IN-TIME COUNT

2017 2018 2019 2020

Households Households 286 1 287 259 1 260 283 7 290

SALT LAKE COUNTY COC & LHCC

MEASURE 1: LENGTH OF TIME (LOT) PERSONS REMAIN HOMELESS

Average LOT Homeless Median LOT Homeless

2 MEASURE 2: THE EXTENT TO WHICH PERSONS WHO EXIT HOMELESSNESS TO

Exit was from SO 33 19 57.58% 5 15.15% 3 9.09% 27 81.82%

Exit was from TH 505 90 17.82% 48 9.50% 28 5.54% 166 32.87%

Exit was from SH* 9 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 5 55.56%

Exit was from SO 46 22 47.83% 5 10.87% 8 17.39% 35 76.09%

Exit was from TH 161 18 11.18% 7 4.35% 12 7.45% 37 22.98%

Exit was from SO 25 8 32% 5 20% 3 12% 16 64%