Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/288994057
Psychological Processes
CITATIONS READS
0 1,257
1 author:
Kemal Kilic
University of Camerino
17 PUBLICATIONS 50 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Kemal Kilic on 02 January 2016.
Psychological Processes
This article aims to present some ideas and thoughts on the possible
relationships among Psychological Processes. Preliminary definitions and concepts will
be given briefly.
It has been proposed in some studies that, these processes can be categorized
according to certain commonalities or according to their interactions with each other. The
well known binary classification of «basic-higher» processes, was presented by Oswald
Külpe and Wilhelm Wundt in the late 19 th century research. According to Wundt the
processes is «higher», if there is no parallel physical processes. Like learning, thought,
memory, and others. Later Vygotsky introduced another criteria for distinction. In which
he talked about higher processes only existing in human beings and being cultural in
origin but not «evolutionary»1 A recent study by Ricardo Tamayo 2, pointing out the
difficulty of defining «consciousness» as a «process» or as a «state», introduced new
way to define processes based on the four Aristotelian causes (material, efficient, formal,
1 R. VAN DER VEER, − M.H. VAN IJZENDOORN, Vygotsky's Theory of the Higher Psychological
Processes: Some Criticisms, Hum. Dev. 28, (1985), pp. 1-9.
1
final), and based on the concepts of «absoluteness» and «relativeness» for the processes:
In the light of the studies that were mentioned in the previous paragraphs,
along with the concepts that will be borrowed from Computer Science, and Philosophy,
alternative perspectives on the relationships among processes will be discussed in the
following parts of this article.
The theory of the «tripartite» soul in the Platonic philosophy can also shed a
2
bit of light on the relationship among processes. In Republic 3 Plato proposed a model on
the concept of justice by making an analogy between «just man» and «just city». Plato
divides human soul into three parts. These are, the «λογιστικόν» (logical), the
«θυμοειδές» (high-spirited) and the «ἐπιθυμητικόν» (appetitive). He also talks about
«normative» hierarchy and relationship among these parts in the «just man». In the soul
of a «just man» the logical part should rule. The appetitive part should be controlled by
logical part and the high-spirited part should enforce the convictions of the logical part.
By doing this it can be said that Plato gives us the preliminary structural and functional
analysis of the human soul. Similarly he proposes the analogy of «just city» and «just
man». The «just city», he says, is the one in which the social classes (merchants,
producers – appetitive, soldiers – high-spirited, guardians – logical) have the same
structure and relationship as in the case of the parts of the soul of a «just man». Similar
relationship and specialization exist for the psychological processes. An analogy can be
made among the parts of the soul done by Plato and the psychological processes that are
proposed by the Psychology today. Namely the logical part contains the cognition, the
appetite part are the motivations and the high-spirited part contains emotions and
passions4. So according to the Platonic theory of justice, in the «just man», cognition
rules, motivations obey cognition, and emotions and passions support cognition.
(URL=http://lep.unige.ch/system/files/biblio/1995_Scherer_Genstudies_Plato.pdf).
3
Whereas in the case of Client-Server model the server serves all the other entities. The
relationships among psychological processes can be considered as in the case of the
models that are listed above. For example sensing by itself is not a process that can be
useful for the survival of the human. But its «output» is important to other processes like
in the case of Producer-Consumer model. Having a process like «memory» for retaining
information is not useful if there is no visual or auditory «sensing», where comes the
«information» to be «stored». In this case «sensing» can be thought as the «producer»,
and the «memory» as «consumer». On the other hand without «memory» one can not
think of any kind of «information processing» system. A system that is open to all kinds
of «input» has to «filter out» unnecessary information through some kind of mechanism.
The «attention» is one of the mechanism that filters out unnecessary information, other
than the physical limits of the human perception system. Without the «intelligence» there
is no meaning to perceive and to store information. Apart from the mechanisms that help
processes to communicate to each other, there is a mechanism in human beings allowing
them to communicate with other human beings. Language (speech) is the main
mechanism in the communication among human beings. While motivations and emotions
can be thought as «adaptation mechanisms» that keep humans directed to their goals or
keep them away from certain environmental conditions. In the computer science these
processes can be thought as «priority adjustments», where system has to give privilege to
one process over others depending on the state of the system, for the best performance.
We can also talk about the dynamism of the processes in us. A process by
4
definition is something that is dynamic. But when we talk about the dynamism of the
process we mean the change of the process, like development, adaptability to
environment. Different from the machine based system processes, we must remember
that through «Learning» which can be regarded as intellectual growth mechanism, human
psychological processes can be perfected over time. Not only from the atomistic point of
view of the psychological processes, but also from the holistic point of view one can see
the perfection of the «designer» of the human psyche. They are given to us for survival,
for life, to increase the light in the universe. It must be remembered also the marvelous
principle of «robustness» in the design of the processes. Blind people is one of the
striking examples of that principle. Not having visual sensing does not prevent blind
people to be able to read, to understand, even to write. Going a bit further it can be
discussed how the deficiencies in high-level and in low-level processes can effect the
survival of the human beings.