1.

Governments, have the responsibility to decide whether to invest, in order for the
country/state to be successful, and it would be a decision for all the nation. There has been
a discussion about which would be better to be fund by the government: either on scientific
research or commercial institutions.

Organizing and funding technological research is a significant challenge facing

governments all over the world. The development of discipline has been strained as the
growing costs of basic scientific research confront specific public budgets. In order to
defeat the bottleneck, universities are seeking tighter cooperation with private-sector
business. This amount of patents filed by universities and university-industry collaborations
has greatly increased at these final few years. Therefore, we are seeing the increasing
development of technological knowledge. This is in loggerheads with some beliefs related
with discipline, as outlined below. While the role of technological advice in administration
may initially seem to be a niche topic, it gets to the very spirit of ministerial thought about
national service efficiency and reform. (Ferns, S., Nov. 2012)

Scientific investigation. The government sponsors scientific research that supports the
government agency mission or goal (collaboratively with U.S. Business where potential) ,
including the aim of producing basic knowledge. Research is conducted or subcontracted at
specified programs. This mixture of long-term standard research, applied near-term
research, and deployment facilitation activities must always be balanced to accomplish
government targets. The amount of benefits to invest in technology, research or anything
that can, not only help the nation, but humanity, means a lot of benefits. For instance,
science isn’t just the study of a plant, as it is seen most of the times, but science can give an
entire population a more plenty life. It takes into account new medical searches, cures,
vaccines (mostly in these times), also a research of how the nation should protect their
patrimony, bearing in mind all the welfares that it will bring.

But its not the only thing the government should focus on, there should be a balance. The
most significant ways in which the Government will support business research are to
increase the flow of current technological knowledge through help of essential research,
and to assist in this development of scientific talent. Additionally, ways should be seen to
have the benefits of fundamental research to achieve industries which do not immediately
apply current technological knowledge. Creativity increasingly relies on technological
knowledge. Investigation to make this knowledge has historically been funded by both
business and government. Although business and administration research expenditure were
comparatively equal in 1980 in the United States. However, despite the increase in business
spending, firms seem to be pursuing—or at least publishing—less standard science. If
corporations are doing less fundamental research, so where do they get these ideas to fuel
their creativity?

Underneath the umbrella of discipline is engineering. Technological investigation needs to

be funded by large business and/or this administration in order for technological
investigation to be made on the measure that earns it quality at the medical journals that
have the respect of other scientists and the credible media. Application is the method by
which study uses findings to manufacture of food products for the people. That’s why, I
conclude government should fund commercial institutions that will benefit and increase
scientific research, as a balance, for both fields, that are essential for the success of a nation.

References:

Ferns, S. (Nov. 2012). Crises reveal muddy waters between government and scientific
advice. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-
network/2012/nov/21/government-ash-dieback-scientific-advice-clarity