Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared For:
U.S. Department of Energy
Assistant Secretary for Energy Technology
Division of Fossil Fuel Utilization
Prepared By:
Pope Evans and ~ o b b i n s Incorporated
,
New York, New York 10036
7
NOTICE
l l ~ hrcpon wa prepared as an account of work
spanrored by the United States Govcmment. Neither the
United Stater not the United States Department of
E n e r a , nor any of their employees, nor any of their
cantrnctors, subcontracton, or their employees, makes
any warranty, express or implied, or auumcs any legal
liability or rcspondbility for the accuracy, cornplrtenen
or usefulnes of any information, apparatus, product or
p r m n direloud, or rcprewno that i u use would hot
infring. ptimlrly nwmd riphl.
Prepared For:
Available from:
. . ..
National ~ e c h n i c a lInformation Service (NTIS),
, U.S. ~ e ~ a r t m e r iotf Commerce .'
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SECTION
.
1 0' SUMMARY OF PERFORMED TASKS
A i r Distributor. Testing
( ~ c t i v i i - .No. ~ 114)
L a r g e S i z e C o a l F e e d - Minimun~
F l u i d i z a . L i o n ( A c t i v i t y TJo. 1 6 1 9 )
O i l F i r i n g ( A c t i v i t y No. 1 6 1 8 )
S u l f u r Capture ( A c t i v i t y N o . 1110)
2.4.1 Greer L i m e s t o n e T e s t s
2.4.2 L o w e l l v i l l e Limestone Test's
F l u e Gas B a g h o u s e P r o g r a m
.(Activity N o . 1620) '
. .
3.0 RIVESVILLE MFB PLANT OPERATIONS .
3.1. Gencral
3.2 P l a n t Outage
3.3 N e w D C - 1 Dampet
3.4 Bed M a t e r i a l T r a n s p o r t M o d i f i c a . t i o n s
3.5 Results.
3.5.1 Airflow. T e s t ~ c c o m ~ l i s h e d '
3.5.2 ~ e l Ft e e d e r - T e s t s C o m p l e t e
3.5.3 F u e l and. S o r b e n t
3.5.4 Test Plan
3.5.5' P l a n n i n g EPA T e s t P r o g r a m .
3.5.6 Modernization Engineering
3.5.7 .Operations
3.5.8 F D Fan ~ a i i . k ~ r r e
3.5.9 F o s t e r . Mlkec-:;.er ~ e v e l . , o ~ m e n t
Corpora!.kior~' . s M e t a l l u r g i c a l
Exami.naition ( P h a s e ' II )
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . , .,
..
, .
. . . .
T a b l e of C o n t e n t s / 2 , . . . .. .. . .
1 .
. . , .
a .
. . . . , . . . .
. ,. . . ,
. .
. .
t
. , .
. I
. . .
.
. . . . ' < . I '
...
. .. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . ., . .
. ... ' .
... - . . ...
. , ' - .,
. ,
. .. .. t :
. . *
. . . . .
4.0 NEW Y. .O R K
,.
~ ~ O F F I C EENGINEGRING:.
. .. . ,
:. ,; . .' : Do,:
. . . ..
,
. . .. GO
4.1 S f a c k 'Sj.1ence.r~ n s t a l i. a g. i o n . :. : -..
.
4
. , . >. ..
. 68.
,
. . . .
4 . 2 . Redundancy S t u d y . 1 : . ., . . , . . . 68. . . . >
, '
.. . . . . ( _ . .- , I . -. . .. . . . 0 . . '
I .
(Foster W h e e l e r :Energy C o r p ~ r a t i o n , )
. . . ..
. , . .
. ,
. .. -. . . ..
, . .
I i .
INTRODUCTION . .
. ,
General
. .
The Government, i n o r d e r t o . i m p l e m e n t , r e s e a r c h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t
work o n a m u l t i c e l l f l u i d i z e d - b e d b o i l e r o p e r a t i n g u n d e r u t i l i t y
e l e c t ' r i c power g e n e r a t i o n c o n d i . t i o n s ,,a w a r d e d DoE/EKDA/OCR
C o n t r a c t No. EX-7,G-C-01-1237 t o P o p e , ~ k a n sa n d ~ o b b i n sI n c o r p o r a t e d
( P E R ) on O c t o b e r 5 , 1.9'12.. - The , w o r k u n d e ~
' : t h i scpntracf is a
f . o l l o h - u p t o work , p r e v i o u s l y b y PER u n d e r OCR c o n t r a c t .
No. - 14-01-0001-470 o s amended, a n d OCR. C p n t r a c t Jgo. 14-02-0001-
1229 which i n d i c a t e d t h a t c o n t i r i u q d : d e v e l o p m & n t : w o u l d h a v e a
high probability o f success. . . . ,
. .: '.' ,
P h a s e I1 F a b r i c a . t . i o n , I n s t a l l a t i o l ~. a n d .'Sh.al;edown S t a t u s
Operation.. . '
. . . . .
P h a s e I11 ~ e m o n s t r a t i . o nO' p e r a t i o n u n d e r S O 2 A c c e p t o r : o d e . ,
Phase I V P r e p a r a t i o n o f D e s i g n a n d O p e r a t i o n Manuals a n d
d e s i g n o f a f a c t o r y - a s s e ~ ~ ~ b l iendd u s t r i a l MFB
unit.
T h i s q u a r t e r l y R e p o r t c o v e r s wgrk p e r f o r m e d u n d e r P h a s e 1, 111
'and I V o f t h e c o n t r a c t i n t h e p e r i o d ' J a n u a r y , F e b r u a r y a n d
March 1 9 7 9 .
1.0 SUMMARY OF PEIIFORMED TASKS
.
.1 1 A l e x a n d r i a , Va. L a b o r a t o r y O p e r a t i o n
Work i n t h e A l e x a n d r i a l a b o r a t o r y f o c u s e d p r i m a r i l y o n t h e
following :
A c t i v i t y No.
P
Description
T h e Iullowing t : e s t s w e r e cornpl e t e d d u r i n g t ! ~ e r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d .
Test
- N o .- D
-. a t e --
Desc::t:.:l.p.tion -Dura1:-i
-.--_ on (Hrs) &&, ,
~ r i l l e db o l t g r i d p l a t e
Shakedown .
Drilled bolt grid plate
Lowellville limestone
Lowellville limestone
Lowellville limestone
Summary o f O p e r a t i n g H o u r s
1.3 N e w York O f f i c e E n g i n e e r i n g
'
s C o n f i r m e d , s t a b i l i t y o f t h e e x j - s t i p y s . t s c k i ~ / i : t hrie!\~.!
s i ; l e n c e r u n d e r c r i t i c . a l w i n d v e l o c i t y c'o:-~dlt i o n s , .
P r e p a r e d d.esig.11 c a l c u 1 a t j . o n . s a n d d r a w i n g s f o r
s t r u c t u r a l f r a m i n g t o accornnodate r e p l a c e n e n t b e l t
conveyor f o r Redler,
o Complet.ed s t u d y t o p r o v i d e f o r r e d u n d a n t FD a n d I D
f a n s and s e l e c t i v e u s e o f e l e c t r c s t a t i c p r e c i p i t a t c 2 r
or bayhouse f i l t e r ,
a . P r e p a r e d d e s i g n c a l c u l a t i o n s and. d r a w i n g s f o r i n s t a i l a . -
t i o n o f f l u e gas s a m p l e d u c t s t o s u p p o r ' t EPA t e s t
program,
c I n v e s t i g a t e d s t r u c t u r a l f r a m i n g a d d i t i o n s a n d modi-
f i c a t i o n s t o accommodate p r o p o s e d I n s t r u m e n t Shpp.
1.4 Subcontract A c t i v i t i e s
1'.4.1 . It
MFB P l a n t A d v i s o r y perat at ions A s s i s t a n c e
(Stone & W e b s t e r 1Zngineeri.ng C o r p o r a t i o n )
S&W c o n t i n u e d t o f u r n i s h o p e r a t i o n s a s s i s t a n c , e a t t ' h c R i v e s ~ j . l l e
MFB P l a n t 'and p r o v i d e e i ~ g i n e e r i n ga n d d e s. i g. n . s u p p o r t f o r t h e
p l a n t m o d e r n i z a t i o n program.
Home o f f i c e e n g i n e e r i n g t a s k s performed i n c l u d e d c o o r d i n a t i o n
and procurement o$ FD and I D f a n v i b ~ r a t i o l li n s t r , u ~ n e n t a t i o ~ ~
and r e a d i n g s a t t h e s i t e t o e s t a b l i s h b a s e l i n e ciata)
e s t a b l . i . s h i n y . maximum~.acceptable. n o i s e l e v e l s . f o r t h e ail:
coolec: concienser and l l o i s e c o n t r o l . op-t+6ns f o r t h e ' tu,rbil?.e . '
by-pass system; c o m p l e t i o n o f s t u d i e s f o r a l t e r n a - t e coal-
and liines.Lone d j - s t x i b u t i o n and. f e e d s y s t e m s ; completed concepcua.1
d e s i g n of tulrbine by-pass s y s t e ~ n ;c o n t i n u e d work on C o n t r o l .
Rbom r e l o c a t i o n and inodernizat.ion; p~:ep.'il-ed.dray.i,ngs for ,
f a b r i c a t i o n of rcplacemen.t a:ir d i s t r i b u t ~ i -
f o r C e l l D and s h i p p e d t o s i t e ,
The f o l l o w i n g a c t i v i t i e s a r e s c h e d u l e d f o r t h e A p r i l , May,
J u n e 1979 p e r i o d :
2 ) Resume p e r f o r m a n c e a n d e m i s s i o n t e s t i n g o f
R i v e s v i 1 l . e FlFB p l a n t . .
3) S t a r t EPA e m i s s i o n c o n t r o l t e s t p r o g r a m a t
R i v e s v i l l e MFB p l a n t .
4) Conduct- f l y a s h . r e i n j e c t i o n performance t e s t s i n
the A l e x a n d r i a PDU.
6) C o n d u c t - p e r f o r m a n c e t e s t s nn n e w soi1rc:e R i . v e o v i l l c
limesto17e in. t h e A l e x a n d r i a P D U .
7 ) . C o n t i n u e New ~ o r kO f f i c e e n g i n e e r i n g s u p p o r t t o
improve R i v e s v i l L e M F i 3 o p e r a t i o n a n d reliability.
8) Complete e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e R . i v e s v i l . l e E'IFl3 p c r f o r n l -
a n c e a t f u l l l o a d a n d p a r t l o a d c o n d i t i o n s . by FWEC.
9) Complete r e p o r t on s t u d i e s o f c o a l . a n d l i m e s t o n e
d i , s t r . i . b u t i o n and i n j e c t i o n s y ' s t e m s a n d f e e d t o
b u n k e r s by ScW.
T e s t i n g of t h e d r i l l e d b o l t a i r d i s t r i b u t o r c o n t i n u e d i 1 1 a c c o r c l a n c e .
w i t h .the t e s t prograr!i,descr.ibed i n t h e previous q u a r t e r l y r e p o r t ,
No. 1 4 . . T h e 9 s q f t t e s t g r i d i s a p r o t o t y p e o f t h e g r i d d e s j . g n
now o p e r a t i n g i n D C e l l o f t h e R j - v e s v i l l e b3FB. I t c o n s i s t s of'
2784, 5/16" x 1 8 s t a i n l e s s s t e e l b o l t s on 0 . 7 2 4 " c e n t e r s o n a 1 / 4 "
thiclc carbon s t e e l base. Each b o l t p r o j e c t s 1 - 3 / 4 " a b o v e t h . e
p l a t & and i s d r i l l e d o u t t o 7/64" ( . 1 0 9 4 " ) a t t h e e n d p r o j e c t i n g
i n t o t h e becl., y i e l d i n g a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2 % o p e n a r e a .: E u r i n g opera.-'
t i o n , t h e becl m a t e r i a l a r o u n d t h e ' b o l t s i s n o t f . I u i d i z e d a n d fol-ins
a 1 - 3 / 4 " s t a g n a n t l a y e r w h i c h i ~ l s u l a t e st h e g r i d p l a t e f r o m thc:
h o t £ 1 - u i d i z e d p o r t i o n o f th.e b e d . An u p d a t e d summary. o f a i r
d i s t r i b u t o r t e s t s t h r o u g h T e s t No. 700-38 i s g i v e n i n T a b l e I-.
To d a . t e , a t o t a l o f 184 h o u r s o f h o t t e s t i n g i n c l u d i n g a p p r o x i -
n a t e l y 2 4 s t a r t - u p a n d . shutdown c y c l e s I-lave b e e n c c ~ ! ~ p l - e t e d .
S i n c e e a c h d r i l l e d b o l t r e p r e s e n t s a n o r i f i c e throu.yh t h e b a s e p l a t e ,
t h e p r e s s u r e d r o p a c r o s s t h e d r i l l e d b o l t a i r d i s t r i l ~ u t o rv a r i e s
d i r e c t l y a s t h e s q u a r e o f . t h e a i r ve1ocj.t.y. The . i n i t j . a l a.mbier,.t
t e s t withoul: b e d G a t e r i a l on t h e g r i d p1ci.k v e r i f i e d t h e ' o r i f i c e
e q u a t i o n a s AI? v a r y i n g with thci a i . r flovr r a t e t o t h e 1 . 9 8 8 p o w e r .
Usincj- t h i s r e l . a t i o n s h i p a s t h e b a s e l - i . n e g r i d p e r f o r m a n c e , aiiy
d e . v i a t i o n u s i n g t h e same t e s t c o n d i t i . o n s w o u l d , depe:lcling on ;the
d i r e c - L i o n o f t h e d e v i a t i o n , i n d i c a t e e i t h e r l e a k a y e 01: p l u g y a g e . . .
R e s u l - t s ' o f p r e s s u r e d r o p v e r s u s a i r £1-01x7 r a t e s f o r : t h r e e , no b e d ,
a m b i e n t t e m l ; ) c r a t u r e t e s t s f o l l o w i l s g 0 , ? 4 , and! 184 hours o f h o t
t e s t i n g a r e s11ox::n i n F i g u r e 1. A s sl-~ov!~.~ l ~ yt h e d.aiia, t h c d r i . l l z d
b o l t a i r d i s t l : i b u t o r h a s e x p e r i e ~ l c e dno . ~ i q n i f i c a n ' pt l u y g a c j e o r
l e a k a g e t o clate. F u r t h e r m o r e , r o u t i n e i n s p e c t i o n ; o f t h e plenun
inclicates s i f t i n g t o be minimal.
. . ..
I n T a b l e 2, t h e a v e r a g e t e m p e r a t u r e o f ' t h e g r i d p l a t e , t h e t?r.per.-
a t u r e i n . t h e m i d d l e o f . t h e i n s u l . a t i n g 1 - a y e r , a n d It-lze a v e r a g e ' b e d
t e m p e r a t u r e a r c summarized. From t h i s d a , t a i t c a n be seer1 t h a t
t h e s t a g n a n t l a y e r of bed m a t e r i a l s e r v e s t h e p u r p o s e of i n s x l a t -
i n g t h e g r i d from normal o p e r a t i n g bed t e m p e r a t u r e s .
R e c e n t t r e n d s i n FBC t e c h n o l o g y a n d c o l d . l i g h t - o f f d i f f i c u l t i e s
have l e d t o a r e e v a l u a t i o n of t h e p r e d i c t i v e methods f o r c a l c u l a -
t i n g minimum f l u i d i z a t i o n v e l o c i t y . S p e c i f i c a l l y , t h e use of
l a r g e t o p s i z e c o a l w i t h overbed s t o k e r f e e d i n g and t h e t r e n d
toward lower d e s i g n s u p e r f i c i a l v e l o c i t i e s t o improve s u l f u r cap-
t u r e w i l l r e s u l t i n o p e r a t i o n n e a r t h e minimum f l u i d i z a t i o n
v e l o c i t y o f t h e bed. Also, c o l d l i g h t - o f f c o n d i t i o n s set t h e
Table 1 -
. . ,
summary of D r i l l e d B o l t ' ~ i D
r istributor Tests I
.,
Date Description
'11/13/78 . . T e s t 7 0 0 - 2 6 ; 5 h r . r u n a t 1 5 5 0 ° F folloi,7ed
<
by o v e r n i g h t slump.
T e s t 600-27; 6 h r . r u n a t . 2 0 0 0 ° F f o l l o w e d
b y o v e r n i g h t slump. .. . ,
. I .
Sl.umping t r a i n i n g f o r o p e r a t o r s ; 4 sluinps
a t 1550°F.
I s o k i n e t i c ' h o t t e s t s , , 6 h r s . a t 155QO.F;
T e s t 700-30; 7 h r s . a t 1550°F.
T e s t 700-32; 7 , h r s . a t 1442°F.
.
T e s t 702-11; 7 h r . o i l f i r e .test at."1.452"~.
. \ ...
T e s t 700-33; 6 h r . t e s t o f c a r b o n 1 i . m e s t o n e
. . ',
. a t '1644OF w i t h 3 u n s c h e d u l e d slumrjs.,
. ,
3/15/79 T e s t 700-36: 2 7 h r . C a r b o n L i m e s t o n e '
, ' Company t e s t : . I ...
_,I
T e s t 7 0 0 - 3 7 ; 6 h r . , a b o r t e d c a r S o n l h e .s,. t o n e
t e s t ; , l o s t 1imestoii.e feed *.. .. ,
T 0....t a E- h o t "&s'ff:,h&uqs
. . .- .,
: ....
I
8& ' . . . . . .. ... .; .. : . ,
. ~ .:
Approximate # of cyd'le~::.;~24 . . ,..: ~,:: . . ... : ..-.
.
:
.
. % : '.
', ... f : 1,.
LB ;,six ;,.f373; : >;:.?:; 25. ;., \;
m ,,AIR
::;.s :;: ;.: L-..:::
FLOW, Ll3.
.-
- .- -----
* Avg. of TC 11. # 2 . 6 5 a t t a c h e d from t h e u n d e r s i d e of t h e
I
g r i d 1/8" i n t o t h e b a s e .
** TC mounted P r u ~ lu~n a e r s i d e o f g r i d , p a s s ' i n g : t h r o u g h p l a t e an2
e x t e n c l i n g 7/8" i n t o d e a d zone o f b e d m a t e r i a l .
d e s i g n volurrie r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e f l u i d i z i n g a i r s i n c e m i x i n g by
f l u i d i z a t i o n o f t h e bed i s r e q u i r e d . O c c a s i o n a l l y , due t o d e s i g n
l i r i t a t i o n s , change i n l i m e s t o n e s u p p l y , o r mixing o f l a r g e c o a l
p a r t i c l e s i n t h e bed, t h e bed mean p a r t i c l e s i z e may become t o o
l a r g e t o h e f l u i d i z e d under s t a r t - u p c o n d i t i o n s . This s i t u a t i o n
h a s o c c u r r e d i n t h e R i v e s v i l l e E.WB and i l l u s t r a t e s t h e n e e d f o r
a c c u r a t e p r e d i c t i o n of t h e minimum f l u i d i z a t i o n v e l o c i t y o f t h e
bed. ,
T h e e q u a t i o n g e n e r a l l y used t o p r e d i c t t h e minimum f l u i d i z a t i o n
velocity is a m o d i f i e d form of t h e Ergun e q u a t i o n . In simplified
form, t h e l?rgun equi11:ion c a n be w r i t t e n a s ;
, where :
= minimurn f 1 u : i d i z a t i o n . v e l o c i t y
"mf
-
- gas v i s c o s i t y
5-1
. ,
= gas.density
Pg
D~ = p a r t i c l e diameter
G. = G a l i l e o number - Dp p g b S - ~~1c-T
g = g r a v i t a t . i o n a 1 , constant-.
- solid .density
ps
.. . .
= v o i d a g e . a t minimum f 1 u ' i d i z a t j . c n
such t h a t :
, ..
I
. .
. .
, .
~ h k sg i v e s v a l u e s f o r t h e q u a n t i t i e s A and B o f 2 5 . 2 5 and 0.0649
r e s p e c tive1.y.
L.
I n s ti t u t e o f Gas .T-echnolpgy CoaJ, ,.Con~v.ers.ion~. Syst e m - T e c h n i c a l
Data 1978!:!!.:...,i;'$di.,j. ~ . . - 9 , . . " ~ ~ ~:;,:.
: 1 ..,., :4-.:.i.;,i.,.ii'\.
.....
.!;.: ,,,...
,
I...
Tabie 3
' Summary of Xihinun Fluidization Tests
- -.. . .(Four Inch Diameter Bed) '
Series I . .
1
. .
-
* Superficial velocity under hot cocditions were calculated. using flue gas flow rates and
densities.
** Scatter of d a t ~due :o difficulty j-n. ~easuringfluidization yklocities.
. .
. . ' 0
Table 4 . .
. . . .
summary of P r e d i c t e d a n d E x p e r i m e n t a l
Minimum F l u j - d i z a t i o n ' v e l o c i t i e s *
series I
S e r i e s I1
Series I
S e r i e s ' I1
.
...
. .a
I;:
!
.:
.
I,'
..
:
.- :
,- !
b e t t e r r e s u l t s under t h e c o l d c o n d i t i o n s . - T h i s i s c o n s i s t e n t
w i t h e a r l i e r measurements made i n t h e PDU and t h e FBM u n d e r c o l d
c o n d i t i o n s ; however, a t 15.50°F t h e I G T c o r ~ e l a t i o n[ E q u a t i o n . ( 3 ) ]
gave b e t t e r r e s u l t s .
S
and Emf = - .50. The I G T c o r r e l a t i o n g i v e s v a l u e s of bs. = ?82. and
€mf = . 5 2 . Thus t h e major d i f f e r e n c e i n , t h e two c o r r e l a t i o n s
l i e s i n t h e choice of shape f a c t o r s . The r e s u l t s of' 1;hese t e s t s
seem t o i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e s h a p e f a c t o r i s c h a n g e s b e t l ~ e e nc o l d
and h o t t e s t s . . . . - ..
Q 2 i n f i u e gas, X
* D a t a not t a k e n .
** A d d i t i : l n a l Liyesccp.c f?:I to ,c:s!.:i.nP<i:: ;?e:. r - 7 . n 3, .
~ u teo t h e low SO2 e m i s s i o n s l e v e l , . t h e f u e l o i l w a s s e n t t o
two i n d e p e i ~ d e n tl a b o r a t o r i e s for a n a l y s i s . The ' r e s u l t s of
t h e s e . a n a l y s e s a r e shown i n T a b l e 6 . A s c a n be s e e n , t h e
a v e r a g c f u e l o i l s u l f u r c o n t e n t w a s 2 . 3 5 % and t h e vanadium
c o n t e n t was s j . g n i f i . c a n t . F o r t h i s r e a s o n , t h e bed m a t e r i a l was
a l s o a n a l y z e d f o r vanadium and t h e r e s u l t , i s shown i n T a b l e 6 .
S i n c e t h e f u e l o i l and bed m a t e r i a l c o n t a i n e d a s i g n i f i c a n t
amount o f vanadium, i t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t t h e h i g h s u l f u r c a p t u r e
r a t e was due t o . t h e i n f l u e n c e of v a n a d i u n on t h e s u l f u r c a p t u r e
reaction.
>.
' A n o t h e r i n t e r e s t i n g o b s e r v a t i o n from t h e t e s t was t h a t when c o a l "
To f u r t h e r exa.inj.ne t h e u n u s u a l l y h i ~ hs u l f u r c a p t u r e , s c a n n . i n g
e1,ec.tromicrog.raphs (SEi4) of samples o f s u l f a.tecl bed ~nat-rial
were'rnade, t o look f o r p h y s i c a l changes i n t h e m a t e r i a l . Due t o
t h e t i m e d e l a y between sal:~plj_nga n d t h e SEN work, sorne decomposi.-
t i o n of t h e bed m a t e r i a l w i l l o c c u r and o b s c u r e t h b s e c h a n y e s .
F i g u r e s 3 and 4 show some of t11.c electron?icrograa~311s .cchi.ch i:~ercr;l
.made., ~1ic:t:ocry.s.l:aIs of ca 1ciu.m carbonate show up as c h a r a c t e r - .
i s t i c p l a t e s on t h e s u r f a c e o f t h e x a t e r i . a l and a r e ii.el.1. definccl
i n a l l of t h e s e ' j . l l u s t r a t i o n s . These pj.ct1.1res d o n o t i n d i c a t e .
any s~-i?oo~t-.h r o u n d ' s u r f a c e s of bed m a t e r i a l t h a t woulc:! h e indi~-i.i:j.ve
o f a. " s a l t ' e f f e c t " . ~ u r t h e r m o r et i l e y do n o t a p p e a r different
frorn m i c r o q r a p h s of bed m a t e r i a l formed b y b u r n i n g c o a l . Thus
t h e o n l y e2.;planat:ion f o r t h e enhanced s u l f u r c a p t u r e i s due t o
some method of a c t i v a t i n g t h e l i m e s t o n e p a r t i c l e s by an e l e m e n t
i n tlie f u e l .
D u r i n g t h e r e p o r t i n g , p e r i c d c h e m i c a l a n a l y s i s of s a r r ~ p l e sfrom
T e s t s 700-28B and 700-30 trere compl-eted. These t e s t s were r u n
during t h e previous q u a r t e r t o provide a d d i t i o n a l s u l f u r c a p t u r e
r e s u l t s using Greer limestone. Calcium t o s u l f u r n o l a r f e e d
r a t i o i n t h e s e t e s t s were s e l e c t e d a t t h e h i g h and low en.d o f
t h e r a . ; ~ g ..of
e i n t e r e s t t o supplement e a r l i e r . . t e s t d a t a . Sulfur
c a p t u r e t c s t s were a l s o s t a r t e d on L o w e l l v i l l e l i m e s t o n e from .
t h e Carbon Linizstone C,ompany o f L o w ~ l l v i l l c , c'lllio. ' This l i n e -
s t o n e i s cl.~ra:c&l~ t h e s o r b e n t m a t e r i a l suppl-iecl t o the Ritrcsville
MF'B .
Table 6 '
416 O i l A n a l y s i s a n d B e d 1 4 a t e r i a l A n a l y s i s
T e s t 702-9, 11/1/78
Lab I L a b I1
Carbon, % 85.22 85.76 .
I-iydrogen, % 11.03 10.80
O x y g e n , %' , .'5 3 1;04
Nitrogen, % -19 . , .41
Sulfur, % 2.38 2.31
Ash, % .09 .10
High 1 3 e a t i n g V a l 18,286 18,310
B tux7
Trace Elements
v I PPln 455 690 ( a s V205)
W i , ppm 54 64 (as NiO)
F e , ppm 6 6 1 (as Fe203)
C1, PPm 238 590
2-F 'r .·
re , 2..1,/4/P .M. 7--B, & 4, 1 .//0/641/·
f - f . +
r I -flil
1
-,t'. '
1
0 i - , 4 1' ":321 -r.
F#' 61, A"A'.....
A ///.1 -'. ·.
» 1
714 78,49#9*71,1,
4 .A 4
P '+ 4 4 r -6 . 915
-44 -' #J
:Gis' .
I. I. "-.. .....
,
„/A-i'-.ij. . .-,_+,21'M
------ - ...+1".,.1.-. -, , 1
"
Test 702-9, 11/1/78
·:4
1*
P JI I ,.1. t
I L.,). .
/
i ., : F *
I -
It*
*6. 4
4.
t. 4 . I.
/4 A .Fige 1./1//.I.Ir
r:
.'.'.-
-
. i.'..
[¥#S, · ··.,· ·r.»
h.; 4*
4....
1
p.9
A Ye,
+
.=,
14
14
1 '..£
a
2.4.1 G r e e r Limestone T e s t s
Test 700-28B was started with &f material f r m T e s t 700-28A aiillrl w a s run for 16
h o u r s a t a n a v e r a g e Ca/S m o l a r f e e d r a t i o of 6 . 7 . The a v e r a g e
s u 1 f u . r c a p t u r e f o r t h e 16 h o u r s was a p p r o x i m a t e l y ' 8 5 8 and t h e
colnbustion e f f i c i e n c y was a b o u t . 8 4 % . Based on p r e v i o u s t e s t
r e s u l t s , 8 5 % s u l f u r c a p t u r e would b e a c h i e v e d a t a Ca/S m o l a r
f e e d r a t i o of a b o u t 3 wl-,en f i r i c g 4 . 5 p e r c e n t s u l f u r c o a l .
The s u l f u r c o n t e n t o f . t h e c o a l i n T e s t 700.-28B shoved a d e c . r e a s e
f r o n 3.4 t o 2.2% d u r i n g t h e . c o u r s e . o f t h e t e s t . This tends t o
l e n d 2ouh-t a s t o t h e a c t u a l s u l f u r c o n t e n t o f t h e c o a l d u r i n g
t h e ' t e s t and co1.1.l.d a f f e c t . t h c u s c f u l i ? e s s o f t h e r e s u l t s . Based
on a v e r a g e s f o r $he t e s t p e r i o d , 8 5 9 s u l f u r c a p t u r e a t t h e h i g h
Ca/S n.!olar f e e d ' i-at'ios may i n d i c a t e t h e e f f e c t o f v low c o n c e n t r a -
t i o n o f SO2 on t h e c a p t u r e r e a c t i o n .
-
-
'* All analisis are listed as percentages.
SO2 ECISSIONS VERSUS T I R E FOR TEST 709-30
. .
' Figure 5
...
..' . .
..... .
4 ,
-
'.T
T z b l e '8
......:, . . 3perating Co?4itions
., .
for Test 700-36, 3/15/73
.-
The, H r s . ] 1133 ;5- .,,!GO $
!!
I C ? ~ 1930
B
:lo? 'iL?d
0230
i.. ::
2
2 P:i li
i!
3 3
' !
1 pI!
Fuel f $ -:. i:' -d
0,
:1- 2
I! 1 i
ii 5 ;
i
3l.C T e q . ,
g 2 i n f l u e gas,,
k
.f
fi
lI63
I , , 4.0
< 1544
f
6.0
%
$
1556
6.0
jj
1
1563
6.0
11
1531
6.0
a
$ 6.0
5508
6.6
I 1543
5.0
11481
7.0
.-
reel f e e d i z t ~ ,lb/i.,r (Coal). '
- .
:: .
5jL
,,-:
'
$
332 I 329
Li
$ 970
!?
g
945
C
-!:
9E6 z
F
955
6
948. g 707
i'
8
SO?;, ;pa
-
* 3ata n c t taken.
Gk No l i m e s t o n e f e e d , f e e d e r i n o p e r a t i.v e -.
Table 9 .
Operating C o n A i t i o n s for Test 700-38,. 3 / 2 2 ; / 7 9
u t i l i z a t i o n and l a r g e s i z e c o a l f e e d l a t r e n d toward i n c r e a s e d
d u r a t i o n t e s t r u n s i s planned. To meet t h e g o a l of l o n g e r d u r a -
t i o n t e s t r u n s on a r o u t i n e b a s i s , m o d i f i c a t i o n of t h e f l y a s h
h a n d l i n g system i s n e c e s s a r y t o s i m p l i f y d i s p o s a l . Depending on
t h e demand f o r s u l f a t e d l i m e s t o n e t o s u p p q r t u t i l i z a t i o n s t u d i e s ,
improvements i n spent bed d i s p o s a l may a l s o be n e c e s s a r y .
Planned m o d i f i c a t i o n s t o t h e f l y a s h system i n c l u d e r e c y c l e o f
f l y a s h from t h e main cyclone t o t h e PDU, r e l o c a t i o n of f l y a s h
weighing hopper t o t h e new f l u e g a s baghouse s o l i d s o u t l e t , and
t r a n s p o r t of f l y a s h t o a s u f f i c i e n t e l e v a t i o n f o r g r a v i t y d r o p
t o disposal bins. These changes a r e d e p i c t e d i n t h e f l o w diagram
i n F i g u r e 8. With t h e s e m o d i f i c a t i o n s , t h e need t o weigh t h e
main c y c l o n e c a t c h w i l l be e l i m i n a t e d ( f o r ' m o s t t e s t i n g ) and t h e
s e n s i t i v i t y of e f f i c i e n c y r e s u l t s t o flue g a s i s o k i n e t i c sampling
w i l l be g r e a t l y reduced. The o v e r a l l r e s u l t s h o u l d be s i m p l i f i e d
f l y a s h d i s p o s a l and reda.ced e f f o r t d u r i n g t h e c o l l e d t i o n of t e s t
data .
6 ,
3.1 General
The f i r s t q u a r t e r o f 1 9 7 9 .was a n o u t a g e - t o - o p e r a t i o n s
t r a n s i t i o n , p e r i o d , f o r t h e R i v e s v i l l e MFB. . he d e m o l i t i o n
a n d r e c o ~ ~ s t r u c t i ocnf , f o r t w a s r e p l a c e d b y a n o p e r a t i o n a l
check-out period. containing no unusual problems a s s o c i a t e d
' w i t h e q u i p m e n t ,' de,sj.gn, a n d c o n t r o l c h a n g e s .. - M o d i f i c a t i o n s
t o t h e b e d m a t e r i a l / f l y a s h s y s t e m a n d t h e Beckman g a s ,
. analysis sys~e$ cluring .the o u t a g e , provcd ' t o b e s i g n i f i c a n t
i m p r o v e m e n t s . ~ r e l i h i n a ro ~b s e r v a t i o n s i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e .
" n u t s a n d l ~ o l t s "a i r d j - s t r i b u t o r i n t h e CUC w a s a. s u c c e s s f u l
d e s i g n change. A s equipment and inst.rumentation improvements
w e r e c o r n p l . . e t e d , e a c h s y s t e m was o p e r a . t e d a n d / o r t e s t e d t o
- i n s u r e p r o p e r i n st a l l a t i o n . T h e e q u i p l n e n t / s y s tenis: c11ecI~-o.ut
w a s f o l l o w e d i.1; mid-March b y a s u c c e s s f u l . l i g h t o f f .
3.2 P l a n t ,Outage
BueL1 cornp1.et.ed r e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d a i r f l o w t e s t s o f t h e
e l e c t r o s t a t i c : p r e c i p i t a t o r o n 7. F e b r u a r y . The a f i r f l o w t e s t s
i n v o l v e d h a v i n g a s a f e t y - e q u i p p e d , man i l I s i . d e t h e b o i l e r
duri.ng c o l d a i r o p e r a t i o n o f t h e f a n s .
01;~: o f t h e l a s t r e n . ~ a i . n i n g t a s k s t o be a c c o m p l i s h e d . d u r i n g
t h e , o u t a g e w a s p ~ u r i n yo f a new i n s u l a t i n q . r o o f o n t h e p r e -
cipitator. ~ u b . - f ~ : & e z ti ei m ~~peratulres prcvenJed pourinq b u t
' o n . 1 5 F e b l 7 u a r y ,. t h e iciercul:lr r o s e a b o v e 32 OF . a n d the j o b was
completed.
w e l l a s . t h e FD f a n w a s . a c c o n i p l i " s h e d . i n ~ a n u a r y ' l T h e y w e r e ,
bumped, c o u p l e d , a n d a c c e p t e d o n 1 8 ' J a n u a r y .
V i b r a t i d n m o n i t o r i . n g h e a d s w e r e i n s t a l l - e d o n .the f a n f o u n d a t i . o r r s
d u r i n g J a n u a r y a n d , v i b r a t i o n r e a d i n g s r e c o r d e d o n 27 ~ a n u a r y .
They are l i s t e d below:
.. ......
. .
.I..D..
- ".
~
FAN. ".. .. .......
...
. Fan
... Motor ' - /
-
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
".
1ior'i.zoiital. 0.07 m i l s 0.i12 m i l s
Vertical : : .. . . . . . . ,.9 .4 2 mi.^.^.. .,-.. . . . . . . . . . _ . . ....*.
. . mils
. ..0,$2
Ax-ia 1 . .. , 1.4 mils .0.90 m i l s
...
.?.
. . . . . . . F,D. FAN
0.11 m i l s 0.08 m i l s
0.06 m i l s 0.04 m i l s
.-
Axial I
0.02 m i l s 0 . 0 3 mils
The ductwork was corripleted i n c l u d i n g 1-ead sheat.hing which
w i l l r e d u c e a m b i e n t . n o i s e o r i g i n a t i n g i n t h e ductwork.
. .
r e d u c e ambient n o i s e l e v e l s and p r o v i d e s a f e a c c e s s t o t h e
s t a c k p l a t f o r m sampl-ing s t a t i o n . A s t a c k s i l e n c e r was a l s o
i n s t a l - l e d t o f u r t l l e ~reduce zmbient n o i s e l e v e l s . I
. .
The a i r p r e h e a t e r (API.1) i n s . t a l l a t i c i l , i n c l u d i n g r o t o r ,
d r i v e motcir, o i l . 1~1o.t-.or, s,ul.enoid, and f i T t e r was compl.t~>ted
i n J ~ I I L I ~ I'rhe
C Y main
. d r i v e was bunipecl 2 2 J a n u a r y a n d con-
f i.rmed .to be o p e r a t i n g p r o p e r l y . I n i ~ ~ i d i , t i . o nthe
, Lieluge
~ y s t s mi 3 i n lace and o p e r a t i o n a l . .
A f t e r b e i n g s u c c e s s f u l l y t e s t e d a t t h e Al.exa~?dria~ i b o k a t o r y , '
of t h e windows. i n t h e new p a n e l a r e n o t y e t c o n n e c t e d ,
1 1 5 have been l a b e l e d and 15 new a l a r m p o i n t s have been
. i n s t a l l e d and t e s t e d .
-
IICJ.
:
tIOtLf181'tILSI U. . U I V .?'I33
A l t h o u g h t h e o u t a g e was e x t e n d e d d u e t o c e r t a i n " u n p r e -
d i c t a b l e ~ " , i t was d e c l a r e d o f f i c i a l l y e n d e d a t 1600 h o u r s ,
1 6 F e b r u a r y 1 9 7 9 . The " u n p r e d i c t a b l e s " c a u s i n g t h e 20 d a y
extension included;
a. B u e l l c o n s t r u c t e d a n u p d a t e d f l o w model a n d a s a
r e s u l t of a n a l y s i s , modified t h e i r o r i g i n a l flow
guide design.
e. From 6 J a n u a r y , t h r o u g h t h e e n d o f the ~ r t o n t l ~t ,h e
o u t s i d e t e m p e r a t u r e was n e v e r a b o v e 3 2 " F , making
' i t i m p o s s i b l e t o p o u r , t h e r o o f of t h e e l e c . t r o s - t a t : i c
precipitator (ESP).
A t t h e t i m e t h e r e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d moderni:zat.ion o u t a g e was
- --
compl.eted and t h e I\IPB u n i t was a v a i l a b l e $ o r o p e r a t i o n ; M o n o n g a l ~ c ? ~ ? ~ ,
P o w e r Company's # 7 b o i l e r was o u t o f s e r v i c e f o r an i n d e f i n i t e
p e r i o d o f t i m e d u e t-o f u e l . s h o r t a g e s . Because t h e u n a v a i l a b i l i t y
o f f e e d w a t e r p r e v e n t s MFB o p e r a t i o n , t h e u n i t w a s - d e c l a r e d
'
u n a v a i l a b l e a n d w o r k proc~+ededo n i n s , t a l l a t i o n o f t h e DC-1
damper.
The p u r p o s e o f t h e damper i s t o i m p r o v e t h e d u s t c o l l e c t o r
e f f i c i . e n c y a t low , l o a d s (when o n l y c e l l s D a n d C a r c i n s e r v i c e ) .
T h i s i s a c c o m p l i s h e d by i n c r e a s i n g t h e v e l o c i t y t h r o u g h t h e
d u s t col1ec:tor. v e n d o r d e l i v e r y prob'lems h a d d e l a y e d t h e
i n s t a l l a t i o n (See E x h i b i t 3 ) .
3.4 Bed M a t e r i a l T r a n s p o r t M o d i f i c a t i o n s
purposes. . b
3.5 Results
3 . 5 . I- . A i r f l o w T e s t Accomplj-shed
D uring t h e months o f J a n u a r y a n d F e b r u a r y , c a l i b r a t i o n t e s t s
.were p e r f o r m e d o n a l l a i r f l o w m e a s u r i n g d e v i c e s i n the com-
b u s t i o n a i r and au,ij.liary a i r systems. 'These c a l i b r a t i o n s
w e r e made b e c a u s e sonle p r e v i o u s a i r f l o w m e a s u r e m e i ? , t s w e r e i n
doubt. T ? s t c o i ~ d i t i o n sf o r t h e Au;:il..iary F D F a n t e s t s a r e
shown i n E x h i h i t 5 a n d f o r t.he F D - I D -Fan .tes.ts i.n Ex11ibj.t 6 .
Test Procedures
I n ' b o t h s e t s o f a i r f 1 . o ~t e s t s , a p i t o t t r a v e r s e o f . t h e
a p p r o p r i a t e f a n d i s c h a ~ : . q ew a s l?erformccl. Sketches .of.
pi.to1: t r a v e r s e I . o e a t i o n s a n d poi.l.:ts a r e . shown . i n E x h i b i t s
7 t.hrougll 1 0 .
. - ,, ' 4
P r i o r t o t e s t i n g , a l l . serising l i n e s w e r e l e a k checked
a n d hl.own o u t . . A l l i i ~ s t r u r i ~ e n twere s z e r o e d a n d cl-iecked.
I n a1.1. c a s e s , bihere a p p l i c a b l e , j . n s t r u m e n . t s were p l . a c e d
a s close a s p o s s i b l e t o t h e measuriricj d e v i c e .
I n a l l t e s t . s , c o n d i t i o n s were a l l o w e d t o s t a b i l . j . z c b e f o r e
d a t ' a c o l . l . e c t i . o r ~bega.n. D a t a w a s talcen a . t f i v e m i n u t e
i n t e r v a l s and two c o m p l e t e p i t o t t r a v e r s e s w e r e p e r f o r m e d
f o r each condition.
11-1 o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n s i m i l a r c o n d i , t i o n s f o r v a r i o u s t e s t
r u n s , d u c t p r e s s u r e ' w a s c l c j s e l y r n c n i t o r e d .a n d. r e s t o r e d
t o same.'pressur.e f o r a l l c o n d i t i o n s . . .
'
Duck t c i ~ q p e r a t u ' r e swe..?-e m n n i t o r e d by a D o r i c D a t a l o g g e r
every f i v e minutes.
Test Results.
Equations used:
where :
. . .
.
p - a i r density ( l b / f t 3) 3
. 0 9 6 5 8 - d e n s i t y c o n s t a n t @ 6 0 % RII ( l b / . f t . )
,
1. Airfoil airflow
M ~ =
~ 1,333,256
. / ----.-.---
APAF. '
= a i r f o i l a i r f l o w (lb/hr)
M~~
= ' a i r f o i l d i f f e r e n t i a l ("NC)
"AF
pA17 =
air density a t a i r f o i l
,
2. C e l l Annubars
! . -
A cell
F
B, cell
1- . -I
where :
*'XN
. .
- cell
..
n o r i h a n n u b a r ' d i f f e r e n t i a l ("WC)
3. G r i d p l a t e AP v s airf.1o.w
. , -:
. .
A cell
where :
V
P
- p i t o t v e l o c i t y (fpmj (from rnfg's e q u a t i o n )
AP
P
- p i t o t d i f f e r e n t i a l p r e s s u r e ("WC.). . .
A u x i l i a r y FD Fan T e s t
where :
= a u x i l i a r y . 17.D. a i r f l o w ( l b / h r )
M~~~
3 '
= Aux F .D'. a i r densjty (lb/f t )
P~~~
=" Aux F . D . f a n p i t o t - v e n t u r i 2 i . f f e r e n -
A P ~ ~ ~ t i a l ("WC)
2. V i b r a t i n g F e e d e r Annubars
where :
= v i b r a t i n g f e e d e r annubar d i f f e r e n - -
A P ~ ~ t i a l ("WC) .
=.' vibrating feeder a i r density
'VF
3. Burner A i r f l o w ,
----.-
'BRN = 2 8 , 2 5 8 J a p I I N pRFD
_.'".. '
where :
= burner a i r f l o w .
M~~~
= b u r n e r . a n n u b a r . d i i f e r e n t i a l ( "WC)
A P ~ ~
S e a l a i r ' a n d b e l t f e e d e r l e a k a g e . a i r c o u l d not b e
determined. For t e s t i n g , seal. a i r w i l l be v a l v e d ' o u t .
C cell
D cell
where:
'&GRID = c e l l a i r f l o w from g r i d p l a t e d i f f e r e n t i a l
(lb/hr) %
4. Main C e l l s A n ~ ~ u b a r
= main cells a n n u b a r a i r f l o w ( l b / h r )
Mi'4~
= Maill C e l l s ~ n h u b a r D
; i f f e r e n . t i . a l . ( "ifJC) . ,
"MN
5. D C e l l P.i.tot - Ventuxies
M~~
= D cell airflow frompitot - venturies
a r e made: . ,
. ., ,.. . . .
., . ., . . .. ...
.. . .
.
.
"
. - , .
L..,
.
'
. ,
. . . . . . . . ...............
,, . . . . . . . . .. . ... . .. . . . . . . . . .
. .
-
AUSILX?xRY 7.Do !?Xi TEST CONDITIONS
1
..- .
1
I C O M M E N T S 1
" .
1-3s . . I-.
I
C.lL.E;;/79
Exhibit 5
FD-ID FAN TESTS C O N D I T I O N S & COlG1I%NTS
Exhibit 6
Main A i r S m n 2 l i 1 l g Location
Main A i r Due.';. Stimpling ~ o n ~ j . ~ ~ d t i o n
Traverse
Point
,-
I.'
Aux A i r Duct Samp1.ing Location
3. A& FD f a n s e a l a i r s h o u l d r e m a i n v a l v e d o u t d u r i n g
testing. T h i s w i l l n o t i n h i b i t u n i t o p e r a t i o n and
' w i l l result i n less error i n t o t a l airflow.
,
. ..
Based on a r e v i e w o f a l l d a t a . ; t h e : e x p e c t e d e r r o r is. t 5 % .
Damper l e a k a g e s f o r e a c h c e l l a r e a s f o l l o w s :
. .
CELL LEAKAGE (lb/hr)
A 30,O.OO
B 23,500.
C 23,000
3..5.2 B e l t F e e d e r T e s t s Complete
a. C o n t r o l Room Hand/Auto % S e t t i n g
b. SCR Motor V o l t a g e
c. S t r i p C h a r t . i n c o n t r o l Room
~ a c h : o ft h e s e was compared t o a n e m p i r i c a l v a l u e , i . e . , t h e
a c t u a l w e i g h t o f coa.1 i n o r d e r t o g e n e r a t e a c u r v e o f " L b s / h r
C o a l F e e d " v s . "Hand/Auto % S e t t i n g " .
3.5..3 F u e l and S o r b e n t
~ u r i n t h ~e f i r s t q u a r t e r o f 1 9 7 9 , 131.4 t o n s o f c o a l a n d 719
t o n s o f l i m e s t o n e were d e l i v e r e d t o t h e MFB. The f o l l o w i n g
t a b l e s u m m a r i z e s t h e a s - r e c e i v e d q u a l i t i e s o f t h e coa'l:
COAL
F i n a l - p r e p a r a t i o n s f o r t h e upcoming e m i s s i o n s a n d p e r f o r m a n c e
t e s t p l a n were f i n a l i z e d . I t e m s s u c h as s t a f f i n g , g a s
a n a l y s i s , o r g a n i z a t i o n , c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m s , e t c . , were com-
pleted. A summary l i s t f o l l o w s :
c. R o t a t i o n c o u n t e r s w e r e i n s t a l l e d on l i m e s t o n e a n d
drain rotary feeders.
- I! .:
d. T h e Beckman g a s a n a l y s i s s y s t e m p r o b l e m s h a v e b e e n
s o l v e d a ~ : d , i r i the case of many o f t h e a n a l y z e r s ,
redundailcy h a s been- added.
e. Data s h e e t s f o r t h e Data A c q u i s i t i o n P e r i o d s a r e
complete.
f. I s o k i n e t i c s t a t i o n s h a v e b e e n made r e a d y f o r u s e by,.
GCA C o r p o r a t i o n a n d t h e d a t a t e c h n i c i - a n s .
g. Computer p r o g r a n s a r e i n f i n a l f o r m .
3.5.5 P l a n n i n g EPA T e s t P r o g r a m
S i n c e J u n e , 1 9 7 8 , G.C:A., t h e c e n t r a l e n v i r o n m e n t a l contractor
w i t h EPA, h a s b e e n i n v o l v e d w i t h PER i n f o r m i n g a n o v e r a l l EPA
t e s t p l a n , an e x t e n s i v e , s e t o f e n v i r - o n m e n t a l t e s t s . p l a n n e d f o r
t h e R i v e s v i l l e MFB. The p u r p o s e o f . ' t h . e s e t e s t s i s t o a n a l y z e
t h e chemical, physical;and b i o l o g i c a 1 . p r o p e r t i e s o f a i r and
s o l i d w a s t e e m i s s i o n s f r o m t h e f l u i d i z e d bed h n i 1 . c ~and t o
s t u d y t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f a i r pol1.1.1t.i.on c , ~ n t r o l s. y s t . e m ~ ,
r e l a t e d t o f l u i d i z e d b e d c o m b u . s t i o n . Most of t h e s e p o l l u t i o n
c o n t r o l t e s t s ' - a r e b e i n g s p o n s o r e d by t h e {J. S . E n v i r o n m e n t a l
, P r o t e c t i o n Agency, w i t h s o m e , c o r o l l a r y t e s t s b e i n g . d o n e by t h e
U.S. D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y ' s Lawrence L i v e r m o r e L a b o r a t o i r y . Also
p a r t i c i p a t i ~ i gw i l l b e , P o p e , E v a n s a n d RobbSns, I n c . , G . C . A .
C o r p o r a t i o n , SoutI!ern R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e , a n d
. .
cur ex Corporation.
. .
. :,
' ,!
5)
D u r i n g t h e i n t e r i m p e r i o d , PER d i s c u s s e d a n d a c t e d upon u n r e - -
s o l v e d i t ~ i n s ., p a r t i c u l a . r l y t h e r e s p p n s i b j - l i t i e s o f . , t h e p a r t i -
cipailts. A m e e t i n g was h e l d o n 2 8 F , e b r u a r y 1979 a t ~ o r ~ a n t o i q n. .
Energy R e s e a r c h C e n t e r , t o r e v i e w a n d comment on .the. s u b m i t t e d
EPA ~ e s Program. t T h i s m e e t i n g w a s a . t t e n d e d by D r . B r u c e f i e n s c h e l
o f EPA, D r . J o h n Wilson of DOE, D r . P a u l F e n n e l l y of GCA a n d
others. I t l e d t o t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n , o f t h e d r a f t copy o f t h e
T e s t P l a n f o r E n v i r o n m e n t a l Measurements a t t h e U.S. D e p a r t m e n t
o f E n e r g y ' s F l u i d i z e d Bed Combustion F a c i l i t y , R i v e s v i . l l e , West
V i r g i n i a (Spring/Sumn~er 1 9 7 9 ) w h i c h w a s p r e s e n t e d by G . C . A . .
C o r p o r a t i o n and d a t e d 2 8 March 1 9 7 9 . Comments. w i l l b e c o n s i c k r e d
and a f i n a l v e r s i o n o f t h e t e s t p l a n s u b m i t t e d i n A p r i l .
. '.?.
3.5.6 Modernization Engineemring
. ,
F o u r m a j o r a r e a s o f e n g i n e e r i n g s t u d y . a r e u n d e r w a y ' t o npgra.de
the liivesville plant. The o b j e c t i v e i s t o p r o v i d ' e a more
r e l i a b l e , v e r s a t i l e and environmental-ly a c c e p t a b l e t e s t f a c i l i t y
f o r long t e r m use. The e n g i n e e r i n g s t u d i e s w i . 1 1 r e s u l t i n
. r e p o r t s t h a t review a l l o p t i o n s , c l e a r l y d e p i c t c o n c e p t s , p r o -
v i d e e s t i m a t e s a n d s c h e d u l e s , p r o v i d e reconunendat.ions a n d
d r a f t purchase s p e c i f i c a t i o n s .
The f o u r a r e a s o f s t u d y a r e :
a. F l u e Gas F a b r i c F i l t e r
D e p a r t m e n t o f Energy i n m i d - 1 9 7 8 m a d e a committ.ment t o
t h e West V i r g i n ' i a A i r ; , P o l l u t i o n C o n t r o l Commission
t h a t ~ i v e s v i l l ewould b e b a c k - f i t t e d w i t h a . b a g . h o u s e
. . . a t the e a r l i e s t opportunity. This i s desirable both
t o e n s u r e con~pl'iance d u r i n g t r a n s i e n t c o n d i t i o n s ( b o t h
p u r p o s e f u 1 , a n d i n a d v e r t a n t ) a s y e l l a s t o permit evai--
u a t i o n o f t h i s : c o l l e c t ~ o n ' t e c h n i q u eon a f l u i d i z e d b e d .
boiler. T h i s s t u d y c o n s i d e r s a l t e r n a t i v e numbers o f .
f a n s and e v a l u a t e s v a r i o u s equipment arrangements. A
r e p o r t was s u b m i t t e d t o DOE J a n u a r y , F e b r u a r y a n d March
1979. . . ‘,,..
, ,
T h e o r i g i n a l i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n and c o n t r o l s y s t e m a n d
p h y s i c a l c o n t r o l room was b a s e d on an. e x p e r i m e n t a l
concept. A f u r t h e r i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n package h a s s i n c e
been added, b u t . t h e r e i s l i t t l e d a t a l o g g i n g , and t h e
p r e s e n t c o n t r o l room i s c o n s i d e r a b l y u n d e r s i z e d . A
s t u d y w i l l r e v i e w a l t e r n a t e c o n t r o l room a r r a n g e m e n t s
and l o c a t i o n s a s well a s a n a l y z e v a r i o u s i n s t r u m e n t a -
t i o n , c o n t r o l s , and d a t a q a t h e r i n g s c h e m e s . The s t u d y
w i l l b e c o m p l e t e by May 1 9 7 9 .
d. C o a l D e l i-v e r y , U n l o a d i n g , H a n d l i n g S y s t e m s
r ,I .
It i s g e n e r a l l y recognized t h a t s h a r i n g of u n c e r t a i n
c o a l h a n d l i n g f a c i l i t i e s w i t h PlPC h a s b e e n a s e r i o u s
hottlenecl:. P u s s i b i l i t i e s f o r independent f a c i l i t i e s
a r e 1 - i m i t e d by t h e s i t e l a y o u t . A r e p o r t on v a r i o u s
o p t i o n s , w:i. ll be c o m p l e t e d d u r j . n g . A p r i l 1 9 7 3 .
3.5.7 Operations
1452 hrs the unit received a master fuel trip (MFT) which
trips all runnin'g equipment. The alarm indication was FD and
ID fan power loss.
As fan power had not been lost, all equipment was restarted
and coal fires in D and D cells were re-established by 1506
Hrs; .The Control Room was notified that the cause of the trip ,
was due to a loose connection on the FD and ID fan power loss
relays.
A s e c o n d MFT. was e x p e r i e n c e d a t 1520 h r s w h i l e r e p a i r i n g
w i r i n g problems. C o a l f i r e s were r e - e s t a b l i s h e d a t 1526
i l r s . a n d t h e u n i t was b r o u g h t b a c k , t o s t a b l e c o n d i t i o n s . .
The u n i t m a i n t a i n e d s t e a d y s t a t e c o n d i t i o n s a n d f l y a s h r e i n -
j e c t i o n was a t t e m p t e d a t 1840 h r s . A t 2225 h r s . t h e r e i n - -
j e c t i o n s y s t e m was ' s h u t down s i n c e i t was e v i d e n t t h a t ' t h e
s y s t e m was d e f i c i e n t i n t r a n s p o r t i n g m a t e r i . a l .
F l y a s h r e i n j e c t i o n was a t t e m p t e d a t 0840 h r s a n d l o o k e d p r o m i s -
ing. C o a l f e e d was'c'ut' b a c k a n d t e m p e r a t u r e s a p p e a r e d good.
R e i n j e c t i o n c o n t i n u e d u n t i l 1006 h r s when DC #1 showed a h i g h
'level a l a r m .
At 1 3 1 5 h r s - a c o a l f i r e - w a s e s t a b l i s h e d i n B . c e l l t o b e e n d e d
f o r t y m i n u t e s l a t e r by a main f u e l t r i p and a g h i h stearn t r i p . ,
A l l c e l l s were s h u t down. The f a n s w e r e r a c k e d o u t a t 0 5 5 5 ' h r s
24. March a n d . a ' w e c l t e n d i n s p e c t i o n o f t h e u n i t b e g a n .
up. Once a g a i n B ~ i l e r# 7 d e v e l o p e d a t u b e l e a k , t h i s t i m e a ,
very serious superheater leak. The u n i t was o u t o f s e r v i c c
f o r t h e r e m a i n d e r o f the month,
3.5.8 F D Pan F a i l u r e . ..
' 1'
3.5.9 F o s t e r W h e e l e r D e v e l o p m e n t corporation'.^
M e t a l l u r g i c a l E x a m i n a t i o n ( P h a s e 11)
I n F e b r u a r y 1978 Ph a s e I o f a M a t e r i a l s S u r v e i l l a n c e Program -
was c o ~ d u c t e dby F o s t e r W h e e l e r Devel-opment C o r p o r a t i o n (FWDC)
f o r t u b e a n d t u b e s u p p o r t m a t e r i a . 1 ~i n t h e R i v e s v i l l e M u l t i -
c e l l F l u i d i z e d . Bed B o i l e r (MFBB) .
A complete metallurgica.1
a n a l y s i s of s i x l y - e i g h t . ( 6 8 ) . samples . w a s p e r f o r m e d . In .
a d d i t i o n , t u b e diameter and w a l l t h i c k n e s s measurements w e r e
t a l t e n t o e s t a b l i s h a b a s e s o f c o m p a r i s o n f o r f u t u r e rnec?sure-
ments, and a comparison o f subsequent w a l l t l i i c k n e s s measure-
m e n t s . a g a i n s t t h e b a s e v a l u e s w o u l d g i v e some i n d i c a t i o n o f
f i r e s i d e corrosion i f i t occurred.
I n S e p t e m b e r 1 9 7 8 a P l i a s e I1 p r o g r a m w a s p r o p o s e d by FWDC.
The p r i m a r y o b j e c t i v e s o f t h e P h a s e I1 a n a l y s i s - w e r e t w o f o l d :
..
a. . To d e t e r m i n e . i f a n y d e l - e t e r i o u s . .e f f e c t s o c c u r r e d .
d u r i n g t h e o p e r a t i n g p e r i o d f o l l o w i n g 'the Phase ' I
'study and, . . 1 1 . ..
b. To a s c e r t a i n i f t h e . b o i l e r c o m p o n e n t s : s u f f e h d
: ; .
' m c t ~ l l u r g i q a ! . d a m a g e k e c a u s e . 0 5 t h e sai.ii.-@reheater
f l > e w h i c h o c c u r r e d o n A u g u s t 9 , 1978.!':.-- :: ' ,
D u r i n g t h e w e e k o f November 6 - 1 0 , 1 9 7 8 , . a t o t a l o f t h i r t y -
n i n e s a m p l e s w e r e removed from s e l e c t e d a r e a s i n C e l l s A , ,
B, a n d C . The s a m p l e s i n c l u d e d t w e n t y - e i g h t ( 2 8 ) b o a t -
t y p e s from w a t e r w a l l . , ' b ? i l e r , and s u p e r h e a t e r t u b e s , e i g h t
( 8 ) c o r n e r s from l a d d e r s u p p o r t s , a n d t h r e e ( 3 ) wedges
from s l i d e g a t e s . T h e s e s a m p l e s w e r e s u b m i t t e d f o r com-
p l e t e a n a l y s i s a n d t h e r e s u l t s compared w i t h t h o s e o f t h e
Phase I program. Tube d i a m e t e r a n d u l t r a s o n i c t h i c k n e s s
m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e made a t t h e s i t e s o f t h e P h a s e I t e s t s
t o d e t e r m i n e t h e amount o f g e n e r a l f i r e s i d e t u b e c o r r o s i o n
w h i c h may h a v e o c c u r r e d .
Most, o f t h e c u r r e n t r e a d i n g s r e v e a l e d a s m a l l d i f f e r e n c e
when c o m p a r e d t o t h e i n i t i a l m e a s u r e m e n t s ; t h i s d i f f e r e n c e .
b e i n g less than' 0 . 5 % . These d i f f e r e n c e s w e r e p r o b a b l y .
t h e r e s u 3 . t o f d e p o s i t s on t h e s u r f a c c s which c o u l d n o t b e
s e e n a!ld/or remove'd.
I n g e n e r a l , no s i g n i Y i c a n t d e t e l i u r a t i o n o f any o f t h e
s a m p l i n g l o c a t i o n s was o b s e r v e d - s i n c e t h e P h a s e I s t u d y .
The u n i t h a d o p e r a t e d t h e f o l l o w i n g h o u r s . s i n c e t h e P h a s e
I study:
A Cell. 3 1 ~ m r s , . .
B ceil 240 h o u r s
C Cell , ,465 h o u r s
D Cell 1050 h o u r s
, ,
-- MFB Q u a-
r-
terly O p c r a-
t i n ~Summary . ,
Perj.od J a n u a r y - M a r c h
OPERATING HOURS
Q uarter To Date
( L i g h t - o f f ,B u r n e r - --
T o t a l Coal Consumption
T o t a l F u e l O i l Consumptj.~n 10,856 .
'
Deminerali'zed Water C r e d i t
Nnmber o f S t a r t s M u l t i c e l l Operation
CBC 7 Dl:.6 1 - 9 7 h r s .
C Cell ] 7
DCB --* 6 7 h r s .
A Cell :o' ' - DCEA 0
' hrs.
10.64 h r s i n C: only.
4.0 NEW YORK O F F I C E - ENGINEERING
' T h e N e w Yorlc O f f i c e d e s i g n a n d e n g i n e e r i n g s t a f f h a s . b e e n
engaged i n v a r i o u s t a s k s i n s u p p o r t of t h e o v e r a l l program
a n d R i v e s v i l l e MFB P l a n t O p e r a t i o n s . These t a s k s i n c l u d e
s t u d i e s and e v a l u a t i o n s o f . s y . s t e m s a n d e q u i p m e n t a n d m o d i f i -
. c a t i o n s , t o t h e MFB p l a n t t o improve p e r f o r m a n c e a n d i n c r e a s e
r e l i a b i l i t y b a s e d on e x p e r i e n c e g a i n e d s i n c e i n i t i a l . s t a r t - ..
up and follow-on o p e r a t i o n . . .
D u r i n g t h i s q u a r t e r l y r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d t h e N e w Yor-k O f f i c e . .
engaged i n t h e f o l l o w i n g ,tasks:
Based on a r e v i e w 05 c a l c u . l a t i . o n s p r e p a r e d by S & W on t h e , .
s t a b i l i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g s t a c k w i t h t h e new s i l e n c e r , i t . . w a s
d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e c r i t i c a l wind v e l o c i t y ( f o r i n s t a b i l i t y ) .
was g r e a t e r t h a n t h e 5 0 y e a r ma.ximum.rccorded i n t h e R i v e s v i l l e
a r e a . Maximum wind v e l o c i t i e s r e c o r d e d f o r t h e p e r i o d 1974
t h r o u g h 1978 i n t h e R i v e s v i l l e a r e a were o b t a i n e d from.NOFA
a n d i n d i c a t e d r e c o r d e d v e l o c i t i e s were b e l o w t h e c . a l c u l a t e d . .:
c r i t i c a l v e l o c i t y . . R i v e s v i l l e o p e r a t i o n s was a d v i s e d t h a t
s t r u c t u r a l r e i n f o r c i n g of t h e s t a c k due t o ' t h e a d d i t i o n o f
t h e s i l e n c e r was n o t r e q u i r c d .
4.2 Redundancy S t u d y
A s t u d y w a s conducted t o e v a l u a t e t h e . f e a s i b i 1 i t . y a n d . c o s t s , .
f o r FD a n d I D f a n r e d u n d a n c y a n d s e l e c t i v e u s e . o f : t h e . E S P o r :
baghouse. General arrangement drawings and c o s t . e s t i m a t e s
w e r e prepared-for four alternate configurations. The a l t e r -
n a t e s w e r e e v a l u a t e d a n d t h e s t u d y recommending t h e l o w e s t
c o s t scheme was r e l e a s e d f o r r e v i e w .
4.3 R o t e x S c r e e n Kelacati.on
To m i n i m i z e d e g r a d a t i o n o f d e l i v e r e d c o a l by t h e p l a n t h a n d l i n g
a n d t r a n s p o r t s y s t e m s , t h e 102 f t . h o r i z o n t a l R e d l e r c o n v e y o r
was r e p l - a c e d by a 24 i n . by 7 5 f t . b e l t c o n v e y o r ; t h e R o t e x
s c r e e n was r e l o c a t e d t o t h e h e a d o f t h e b e l t c o n v e y o r and t h e
crusher relocated adjacent t o the screen. This necessitated
c h a n g e s i n t h e e x i s t i n g s t r u c t u r a l s u p p o r t s y s t e m w h i c h was
c h e c k e d f o r a d e q u a c y a n d new members a d d e d . Design c a l c u l a -
t i o n s were up-dated and d r a w i n g s r e v i s e d t o r e f l e c t t h e
changes.
4.4 EPA P a r t i c u l a t e C o n t r o l T e s t
S t r e s s a n a l y s i s f o r t h e 6 i n . a n d 1 0 i n . d u c t r u n s w i t h and.
w i t h o u t e x p a n s i o n j o i n t s w a s carnpletcd. R e s u l t s i n d i c a t e d
t h a t . expansion j o i n t s were r e q u i r e d t o a v o i d o v e r s t r e s s .
D r a w i n g s were p r e p a r e d o f ' p i p i n g a r r a n g e m e r i t s w h i c h . i n c l u d e d
expansion j o i n t s , g u i d e s and anchors t o reduce s t r e s s e s t o
a l l o w a b l e l i m i t s and r e l e a s e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n .
4.5 Steam v e n t . S i l e n c e r Exterisl.ons
4;6. c o n t r o l Room
. . 14odifi c a t i o n
. .
S t r u c t u r a l infor,mation regarding t h e m o d i r i c a t i o n s r e q u i r e d
f o r e x t e n s i o n o f t h e p r e s e n t c o n t r o l r o o m . w a s p r o v i d e d S&W
f o r two a l t e r n a t e a r r a n y e m e n t s undef c o n s i d ~ e r a t i o n .
-
BOSTON OFFICE ACTIVITIES
-
Noise ---. Review
- (EDR-02)
CoordinaLed PYocurement and installation of FD & ID fan vibra-
.tion instrumentation. Readings were taken at site to establish
baseline data. Data was analyzed and baseline parameters set.
Noise requirements were established for the Air Cooled Condenser
Specification and noise control options for the Turbine Bypass
System were defined.
Coal Delivery and .--Injection System (EDR-08)
studies were completed related to coal and limestone distribu-
.tion and injection systems and coal and limeskone feed to
bunkers. Final draft irl preparation for submittal.
Turbine Bypass System (EDR-10).
ConceptuaJ d e s i gn of the krypdss system was con~pleted. Final
bid specifications for purchase of major equipment were sub-
mitted to PER. Engineers visited site to review the proposed
installation location and to develop structural input for
geotechnical design criteria. Preparation of the Boiler Feed
Pump Specjfication was started as backup should the effort to
locate a used pump and motor. be unsuccessful.
.-
Control Room Modernj ~ a t i o i (EDK-14
~ )
P r e p a r e d and i s s u e d e n g i n e e r i n g s k e t c h e s d e t a i l i n g t h e m o d i f i -
c a t i o n s and d u c t f a b r i c a t i o n work r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e
new b y p a s s damper i n t h e e x i s t i n g D C - 1 d u c t w o r k . Control
c Z r c u i t s a n d h a r d w a r e f o r damper c o n t r o l w e r e p r c v i d e d a n d a '
d e s i g n drawing developed from e n g i n e e r i n g s k e t c h e s .
G e n e r a l A r r a n g e m e n t . a n d S i t e P l a n d r a w i n g s were i s s u e d o n
J a n u a r y 31.
FIELD ACTIVITIES
I
P r e c i p i t a t o r Revie'w (EDR-05)
CBC F l y a -
s h R e i n j e c t i o n System (EDR-09) -
A s s i s t e d i n m o d i f i c a t i o n work on F l y a s h R e i n j e c t i o n Sys?tem.
T e s t e d s y s t e m and . m o d i f i e d t o m e e t d e s i g n r e q u . i r e m e n t s .
A s s i s t e d i n c o n v e r s i o n o f Bed ~ a t e r i a iLetdown s y s t e m t o
vacuum o p e r a t i o n .
Medium P r e s s u r e Steanl- Svstern
- . . -Review ( F R - 3 2 )
Designed a n d s p e c i f i e d m a t e r i a l f o r p r e c i p i t a t o r hopper
steam-h e a t e r s .
Resul. t s
R e s u l t s a c t i v i t i e s c e n t e r e d on s e t up a n d p e r f o r m a n c e t e s t s
o f c o a l f e e d e r s , a u x i l i a r y a i r a n d main a i r . Verification
a n a l y s i s o f p e r f o r m a n c e c a l c u l a t i o n e q u a t i o n s was u n d e r t a k e n .
isc cussed a'nd i m p l e m e n t e d w i t 1 1 PER p e r s o n n e l , recommended
r e v i s i o n s t o p e r f o r m a n c e c a l c u l a L i o n s i n c o m p u t e r program.
Completed p a r t i a l v e r i f i c a t i o n o f c o m p u t e r c h a n g e s v s . hand
calculation. P a r t i c i p a t e d i n t e s t i n g program d r y r u n s a t
s i t e . Upllated ~ e s Pt l a n .
___
Safety
C o n d u c t e d d a i l y s a f e t y t o u r s o f t h e p l a n t and i n v e s , L i y d t i o n s
of m i n o r accidcrits. D i s c u s s e d u n s a t i s f a c t o r y s a f e t y a r e a s
a t 2 February S t a f f Meeting. C o n d u c t e d a f i r e d r i l l on 1 4 . .
March. A t t e n d e d DOE m e e t i n g i n Morgantown r e l a t i v e t o
u n s a f e c o n d i t i o n s and r e s p o n s i b l e s u p e r v i s o r s were n o t i f i e d
v e r b a l l y o r i n w r i t i n g of v i o l a t i o n s .
FWEC c o n t i n u e d t o p r o v i d e s u b c o n t r a c t . s e r v l c e s i n s u p p o r t o f
o p e r a t i o n a n d improvement i n p e r f o r m a n c e a n d r e l i a b i l i t y o f
t h e R i v e s v i l l e MFB u n i t . During t h i s q u a r t e r l y r e p o r t i n g
p e r i o d f a b r i c a t i o n of replacement a i r d i s t r i b u t o r s f o r C e l l
D was c o m p l e t e d a n d u n i t s d e l i v e r e d t o R i v e s v i l l e f o r
i n s t a l l a t i o n : e n g i n e e r i n g evaluation o f f u l l l o a d and p a r t . '
l o a d performance. o f t h o R i r ~ e s v i . l . l . eI&~'EI steam g e n e r a t o r wcre
o o n d u c t e d ; a M a t e r i a l s S u r v e i l l a n c e R e p o r t based on metal- .
l u r g i c a l sar~lplest a k e n from t h e R i v e s v i l l e MFB u n i t was
c o m p l e t e d .and i s s l i e d .
Systems Modification
The r e p l a c e m e n t a i r d i s t r i b u t o r f o r t h e R i - v e s v i l l e MFR C e l l :
D was d e l i v e r e d t o t h e j o h s i t c on 5 ,5anuary a n d s u b s e q u e n t . 1 ~
i n s t a l l e d by f i e l d p e r s o n n e l . Minor . f i t . u p p r o b l e m s w e r e
c o r r e c t e d a n d f a b r i c a t i o n d r a w i n g s for C e l l s C a n d B . r e p l a c e - :
m e l i t g r i d s c o r r e c t e d t o avoid r e o c c u r r a n e e .
L a b o r a t o r y e v a l u a t i o n o f m e t a l l u r g i c a l s a m p l e s t a k e n from
t h e R i . v e s v i l l e s t e a m g e n e r a t o r was c o m p l e t e d . A r e p o r t of
the r e s u l t s was completed a n d i s s u e d t o PER and DOE.
. , . . . .
Conceptual designs and a c'ost' est.imate-' were prepared for
fabrication of economiacr b a f f l ~ sfor the Rivesville M F H
unit and submit'ted to PER for evaluation.
Systems Evaluation
Work continued on ;valuation pf the Rivesville MPB perform- ,
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300