$~13.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 5220/2018
YOGESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCTD AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC for GNCTD
with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Ms. Shiva Pandey,
Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
ORDER
% 16.05.2018
CM APPL. 20225/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions
W.P.(C) 5220/2018 and CM APPL. 20224/2018
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 03.04.2018 passed by
the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the O.A. filed by him for
issuing directions to the respondents to consider his representation for
promotion to the post of Foreman Instructor on the ground that the said
petition is pre-mature and no DPC has been conducted so far for selecting
the candidates as the case of the private respondents had yet to be
considered.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had
submitted a detailed representation dated 14.03.2018 to the respondent
No.2/Directorate of Training and Technical Education, Govt. of NCT of
Delhi against the order dated 16.2.2018 on the subject of promotion to the
post of Foreman Instructor (Mechanical), wherein the names of the
W.P.(C) 5220/2018 Page 1 of 2
respondents No.5 to 9 herein have been mentioned as being eligible
candidates. He states that the petitioner will be satisfied if the said
representation dated 14.03.2018, still pending at the end of the respondent
No.2, is considered and decided in accordance with law within a reasonable
time.
3. Ms. Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2, who
appears on an advance notice, states that she has received a complete set of
the paper book.
4. Having regard to the limited prayer made by the petitioner herein, the
present petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application with
directions issued to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the
representation dated 14.03.2018 submitted by petitioner and pass a speaking
order thereon under written intimation to him, within four weeks from today.
5. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision taken by the respondents,
he shall be entitled to seek his remedies as may be available to him, in
accordance with law.

HIMA KOHLI, J

PRATIBHA RANI, J
MAY 16, 2018
na

W.P.(C) 5220/2018 Page 2 of 2