Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
36 (2003) 295–302
Incorporation of bovine dry blood plasma into biscuit flour for the
production of pasta
A.M. Yousif a,*,1, P. Cranstonb, H.C. Deetha
a
School of Land and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
b
Fort Dodge Australia Pty. Ltd., 11 Moors Road, Glenorie, NSW 2157, Australia
Received 11 October 2001; accepted 25 February 2002
Abstract
Spray-dried blood plasma (DBP) (10.9 g/100 g [w/w] nitrogen) was added to medium-protein biscuit flour (1.4 g/100 g N) during
pasta manufacture. High-protein durum semolina (2.0 g/100 g N) was used to produce the control pasta. Sensory data indicated that
the addition of DBP produced pasta with significantly better colour intensity and acceptability, aroma intensity, flavour intensity,
textural strength, texture acceptability, aftertaste intensity, aftertaste acceptability, and overall acceptability. The DBP/biscuit flour
formulation that gave the optimum balance between pasta protein content and organoleptic acceptability contained 2.2 g/100 g
DBP. A higher content of DBP resulted in increased protein levels, but these pasta formulations were less acceptable
organoleptically.
r 2002 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
0023-6438/03/$30.00 r 2002 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00215-3
296 A.M. Yousif et al. / Lebensm.-Wiss. U.-Technol. 36 (2003) 295–302
American Meat Protein Corporation, Ames, IA, USA. Analyser (Stable Micro Systems, Black Down Rural
High-protein durum semolina (2.0 g/100 g nitrogen, dry Industries).
weight basis) from George Weston Flour Mills, Sydney, Pasta cooking followed the method of D’egidio et al.
was used to prepare control samples of pasta. Medium- (1990). Pasta (1.7 mm thick, 100 g) was cooked in
protein biscuit flour (1.4 g/100 g nitrogen, dry weight boiling tap water (1 L) without added salt for 13 min.
basis) from George Weston Flour Mills, Sydney, The cooked pasta samples were kept in water (B3 min)
fortified with DBP, was used to make experimental at room temperature. For each pasta treatment, three
batches of pasta. strands were chosen at random and placed in parallel
on the measurement apparatus. The textural strength
2.2. Pasta production was measured by applying vertical pressure (peak
force in grams) via a flat circular (50 mm diameter)
The pasta was prepared by the method of D’egidio, aluminium probe. This measurement was made in
Mariani, Nardi, Novaro, and Cubadda (1990). The triplicate and an average of the three measurements
formulations of all pasta produced and pasta ingredients recorded. The initial cut with the teeth (the bite)
are shown in Table 1. In general, 800 g of water was was approximated by the force (in grams) required to
added slowly to 2.5 kg of flour and powdered bovine compress the sample to 1.7 mm depth (peak 1 in Fig. 1).
blood plasma, and blended in an Eberhardt spiral mixer. After the first compression, the probe was withdrawn
A mixing time of 320 s was used for each formulation and then driven again into the pasta (peak 2 in Fig. 1).
at the maximum mixer speed. The mixture was The use of the texture analyser resulted in four
immediately extruded through a La Parmigiana Fidenza measurements, hardness (bite), the maximum force
extruder that continuously mixed as it extruded the necessary to attain a given deformation; springiness,
pasta through a 1.7 mm diameter die. The pasta strands the rate at which a deformed sample returns to its
were elevated on poles and air-dried at room tempera- undeformed condition after the deforming force is
ture (201C) for 48 h until an average moisture level of removed; chewiness (or resilience), the energy required
10.5 g/100 g was reached. The moisture content was to masticate a semi-solid sample to a steady state of
determined by the AOAC (1980) method 14.003. swallowing; and gumminess, the energy required to
Table 1
Pasta formulations
Table 3
Colour measurementsa of dry and cooked pasta formulations
Formulations L a b DE*ab
Dry pasta
(1) Durum semolina 83.6571a 0.2370.06a 18.5070.52a
(2) Biscuit flour 82.5470.4a 1.5870.12d 11.2570.66d 7.46
(3) Biscuit flour/ 2.2 g/100 g DBP 80.1970.45b 1.9970.09c 13.3270.47c 6.19
(4) Biscuit flour/ 4.2 g/100 g DBP 79.5370.55b 2.1370.18c 14.0570.6bc 7.17
(5) Biscuit flour/ 6.3 g/100 g DBP 78.9670.77b 2.4270.25b 14.4570.67b 7.89
(6) Biscuit flour /8.4 g/100 g DBP 77.3670.86c 2.8870.22a 15.0370.38b 9.45
Cooked pasta
(1) Durum semolina 73.0670.93a 1.9070.26d 15.7970.52a
(2) Biscuit flour 71.0570.75b 0.3270.07c 11.2670.62d 3.33
(3) Biscuit flour/ 2.2 g/100 g DBP 70.0070.9b 0.3770.08c 12.1970.42c 4.97
(4) Biscuit flour/ 4.2 g/100 g DBP 68.4270.67c 0.0470.04b 13.3870.56b 5.58
(5) Biscuit flour/ 6.3 g/100 g DBP 66.0970.57d 0.6270.1a 15.7270.49a 7.41
(6) Biscuit flour /8.4 g/100 g DBP 65.7370.78d 0.7170.13a 15.3270.44a 7.79
value (Table 3). Both raw and cooked DBP pasta and biscuit flour/DBP formulations with increasing
formulations exhibited a progressive increase in b value, DBP. Large differences were observed between the dry
indicating increased yellowness with increasing DBP durum and biscuit flour pastas. This difference was far
addition (Table 3). Lee et al. (1991) found similar results greater than the difference between the cooked durum
while substituting egg white with DBP in devils food pasta and cooked biscuit flour pasta formulations,
cake production. indicating loss of pigment colour from the durum pasta
Overall, the above L, a and b colour values indicated during cooking. Comparison of the raw and cooked
that with increased DBP addition, the dry and cooked biscuit flour/DBP formulations showed lower DE*ab
biscuit flour pasta formulations become gradually values between the cooked durum pasta and cooked
darker, redder and more yellow (Table 3). This change, biscuit flour/DBP formulations than the DE*ab values
which reflects the brownish coloration of the DBP of the raw pasta counterparts; this is indicative of loss of
added, is consistent with other reports that addition of pigment colour from the DBP during cooking.
more than 2 g/100 g DBP to commercial bread and cake The cooked biscuit flour/DBP (2.2 g/100 g) pasta
results in darkening of the crumb and crust colour had the lowest DE*ab, that is, its colour was closer
(Bates, Wu, & Murphy, 1974; Khan, Rooney, & Dill, to that of the cooked durum pasta than the other
1979; Lee et al., 1993). biscuit flour/DBP pastas. However, according to the
The CDI, DE*ab, defined by Minolta Camera Co. Handbook of Colour Science (1989), this difference
Ltd. Japan (1987) as the ‘direct distance, in a straight (DE*ab=4.97) is ‘appreciable’ and would be detected by
line, between any two colours’ is a useful objective index most people.
for determining colour differences. According to the
Handbook of Colour Science (1989), DE*ab, between 3.2.2. Texture
0 and 0.5 is a trace difference (impossible to detect There was a gradual increase in the hardness or ‘bite’
by human eyesight), between 0.5 and 1.5 is slightly of pasta with increased levels of DBP addition to the
discernible (hard to detect by human eyesight), between biscuit flour, up to pasta formulation 5 (6.3 g/100 g
1.5 and 3.0 is noticeable (detectable by trained people), DBP). Formulation 4 (4.2 g/100 g DBP) was not
between 3 and 6 is appreciable (detectable by ordinary significantly different from the durum sample while
people), a difference of 6.0 to 12.0 is large (large formulation 5 showed significantly greater hardness.
difference in the same colour group) and larger than The chewiness and gumminess of the biscuit flour pasta
12.0 is extreme (another colour group). DE*ab is used was low and, with DBP addition, initially decreased,
here to compare the overall colour of the different pasta then increased to a maximum value in pasta formulation
formulations. The values for the index in Table 3 are 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP) (Table 4), which was not sig-
calculated relative to the colour of the durum pasta, that nificantly different from that of the durum pasta.
is, DE*ab for the durum pasta is zero. Therefore, hardness, chewiness and gumminess of the
Both raw and cooked pasta exhibited a progressive biscuit flour/DBP formulations reached the levels of the
increase in DE*ab between the durum pasta formulation durum pasta control at 4.2 or 6.3 g/100 g DBP addition.
A.M. Yousif et al. / Lebensm.-Wiss. U.-Technol. 36 (2003) 295–302 299
Table 4
Textural parameters of the pasta formulations as measured by a texture analyser
Table 5
Mean intensity scores for five sensory attributes of the pasta formulations
Attribute Durum Biscuit Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ LSD values
semolina flour 2.2 g/100 g DBP 4.2 g/100 g DBP 6.3 g/100 g DBP 8.4 g/100 g DBP at Po0.05
According to the ANOVA analysis, the variation in within the gluten complex. Gluten of medium strength
springiness with DBP addition was not significant. appears to produce pasta of optimum cooking quality.
An explanation for this increase in the pasta hardness In particular, a high proportion of glutenins among the
is that increased DBP addition to the biscuit flour gluten proteins appears to be a prerequisite for the
resulted in increased protein content in the pasta. With production of superior quality pasta (Dexter & Matson,
the presence of increased protein, better dough devel- 1979). Therefore, the protein level and structure are
opment occurs during the dough mixing stage, where the related to the pasta textural strength and cooking
protein forms into aggregates that result in higher dough quality.
strength due to a stronger protein matrix (Blanshard, Bovine blood plasma proteins are equivalent in
Frazier, & Galliard, 1986). During cooking, the protein functional aspects to egg albumen (Lee et al., 1991)
matrix is denatured changing from soft gluten to a providing heat coagulation properties similar to natural
rubber-like material, thereby increasing the bite and egg in cereal products (Johnson, Havel, & Hoseney,
internal firmness of the cooked pasta (Oh, Seib, Ward, 1979; Khan et al., 1979; Duxbury, 1988). This suggests
& Deyoe, 1985). Increased DBP addition to biscuit flour that blood plasma proteins interact strongly with and
resulted in increased pasta chewiness and gumminess therefore reinforce the wheat gluten, thereby increasing
(Table 4). This may be due to the interaction of the the textural strength of pasta formulations based on
blood proteins with the wheat proteins in the cooked biscuit flour to which DBP is added.
pasta, which occurs as a result of the binding capacity of
DBP. The chewiness and gumminess of the pasta may
also be enhanced by the plasma proteins alone, which, 3.3. Sensory evaluation of pasta
after coagulation, form a stable matrix with good
emulsification properties. Addition of 6.4 g/100 g DBP 3.3.1. Colour intensity and acceptability
to cake has been found to increase the chewiness, Biscuit flour pasta was perceived to be significantly
springiness and gumminess (Lee et al., 1991). This level lighter in colour than all the other pasta formulations.
of addition is close to that of formulation 5 (6.3 g/100 g Due to the brownish colour of DBP, pasta formulations
DBP), which showed the maximum levels of hardness, 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP), 4 (4.2 g/100 g DBP), 5 (6.3 g/100 g
chewiness, and gumminess in this investigation. All DBP) and 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP) exhibited significantly
parameters were lower for pasta formulation 6 (8.4 g/ increased colour intensity with increased DBP addition.
100 g DBP); the reason for this is unclear. Formulation 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP) was assessed as having
Differences in pasta dough rheology and pasta a colour closest to that of the durum pasta (Table 5).
cooking quality may be largely attributed to the proteins The objective colour measurements (Table 3) were
300 A.M. Yousif et al. / Lebensm.-Wiss. U.-Technol. 36 (2003) 295–302
Table 6
Hedonic acceptability means for six attributes of the pasta formulations
Attribute Durum Biscuit Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ Biscuit flour/ LSD values
semolina flour 2.2 g/100 g DBP 4.2 g/100 g DBP 6.3 g/100 g DBP 8.4 g/100 g DBP at P=0.05
consistent with the above, indicating a good correlation 3.3.3. Flavour intensity and acceptability
between the objective and subjective colour evaluation. No significant difference in flavour intensity was
Biscuit flour pasta colour acceptability increased with observed between the durum pasta and the biscuit flour
increased DBP addition (Table 6). The colour of the pasta, and pasta formulations 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP), and 4
durum pasta was significantly more acceptable than any (4.2 g/100 g DBP) (Table 5). Pastas with the two highest
other formulation. Pasta formulations 4 (4.2 g/100 g levels of DBP addition, formulation 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP)
DBP), 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP), and 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP) were and formulation 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP), had significantly
more acceptable than the biscuit flour pasta but not stronger flavours than the durum and biscuit flour
significantly different from one another in perceived pastas and pasta formulations 3 and 4.
colour. The colour of the pasta prepared from biscuit The flavour acceptability scores for pasta formula-
flour was less acceptable than that of pasta formulations tions 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP) and 4 (4.2 g/100 g DBP) were
3–6 containing DBP. This indicates that the panellist not significantly different from that of the reference
preferred the formulated pasta that exhibits a colour durum pasta (Table 6). This is consistent with the
similar to the durum pasta. On the basis of the objective flavour intensity data. The other three pastas were
colour data (Table 3), pasta formulation 3 (2.2 g/100 g significantly less acceptable.
DBP) was closest in colour to the durum pasta; Other researchers have observed that addition of 2 g/
however, the colour acceptabilities for pasta formula- 100 g DBP to commercial bread produced bread with
tions 4–6 were not significantly different from that of acceptable taste, but addition of 4 g/100 g DBP or
formulation 3. greater resulted in the formation of objectionable
flavours (Khan et al., 1979). The increase in flavour in
3.3.2. Aroma intensity and acceptability the higher DBP formulations is attributable to the
No significant difference was observed in aroma meaty flavour of the sarcoplasmic proteins in the DBP
intensity between the durum pasta, biscuit flour pasta and (Duxbury, 1988).
pasta formulations 4 (4.2 g/100 g DBP), and 5 (6.3 g/100 g
DBP) 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP) (Table 5). 3.3.4. Textural strength and acceptability
There were no significant differences among the The subjective perception of pasta textural strength
acceptability scores for aromas of the biscuit flour pasta followed a similar trend to pasta hardness as measured
and pasta formulations 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP), 4 (4.2 g/100 g by the texture analyser (Table 4); that is, it increased in
DBP), 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP) and 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP) the biscuit flour/DBP pasta formulations with increased
(Table 6). Pasta formulations 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP) and 4 DBP addition (Table 5). [Except for formulation 6
(4.2 g/100 g DBP) were not significantly different from (8.4 g/100 g DBP addition), which was perceived to have
the durum pasta. the strongest texture but its ‘hardness’ was inexpli-
The presence of a meaty aroma is detrimental to an cably less than that of formulation 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP
essentially vegetarian product. It is therefore of interest addition)]. Furthermore, statistically the texture
that, overall, no great difference was observed in aroma strengths of pasta formulations 3 (2.2 g/100 g DBP), 4
intensity and acceptability between the standard durum (4.2 g/100 g DBP), and 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP) were not
pasta and the other pasta formulations. This may be due significantly different from that of the durum pasta.
to the volatility of the DBP aroma that may dissipate However, the texture of all trial formulations was
during cooking. Bates et al. (1974) reported that less acceptable than that of the durum pasta control
addition of pork blood to bread resulted in a slight (Table 6). There were no significant differences among
cooked-liver aroma that dispersed and was not evident the texture acceptability scores for the pasta formula-
when the bread was allowed to cool and then sliced and tions containing DBP, but they were all significantly
toasted. higher than that of the biscuit flour pasta.
A.M. Yousif et al. / Lebensm.-Wiss. U.-Technol. 36 (2003) 295–302 301
The texture as perceived by consumers can be also be an impediment to the introduction of such a
represented by a combination of the objective measures product into the market.
of texture given in Table 4. These also show the biscuit
flour/DBP pastas to be closer in texture to the
durum pasta control than the biscuit flour. In fact, 4. Conclusion
from Table 4, it appears a biscuit flour/DBP pasta
containing between 4.2 g/100 g and 6.3 g/100 g would be The addition of DBP to biscuit flour resulted in pasta
closest in texture to the durum pasta. with increased textural strength, darker colour and a
higher protein content. The sensory assessment indi-
3.3.5. Aftertaste strength and acceptability cated that the addition of DBP improved the pasta
The addition of DBP to biscuit flour produced pasta colour intensity and acceptability, aroma intensity,
with progressively stronger aftertastes. However, the flavour intensity, textural intensity and acceptabi-
biscuit flour pasta and pasta formulations 3 (2.2 g/100 g lity, aftertaste intensity and acceptability, and overall
DBP) and 4 (4.2 g/100 g DBP) were not significantly acceptability.
different from the control durum pasta. Pasta for- Subjective and objective assessments of the biscuit
mulation 6 (8.4 g/100 g DBP) exhibited a significantly flour/DBP formulations indicated that the pasta for-
stronger aftertaste than all other pastas (Table 5). mulation containing 2.2 g/100 g DBP gave a balance
The aftertaste acceptability of pasta formulations 3 between pasta protein content and organoleptic
(2.2 g/100 g DBP) and 5 (6.3 g/100 g DBP) was not acceptability. Increased addition of DBP, although
significantly different from that of the durum pasta. All increasing the protein content and textural strength of
other pastas were less acceptable in aftertaste than these the pasta, resulted in a pasta with lower organoleptic
three pastas (Table 6). acceptability.
Lee, C. C., Love, J. A., & Johnson, L. A. (1993). Sensory and physical starch damage on the quality characteristics of dry noodles. Cereal
properties of cakes with bovine plasma products substituted for Chemistry, 62, 441–446.
egg. Cereal Chemistry, 70, 18–21. Olson, F. C. (1970). Nutritional aspects of offal proteins. In
Minolta Camera Co. Ltd. Japan (1987). Minolta chroma meter Proceedings of the Meat Industry Research Conference, 26–27
(CR-200, CR-231) user manual (p. 62). Japan: Minolta Camera March, (pp. 23–27). University of Chicago: American Meat
Co. Ltd. Research Institute Foundation.
Oh, N. H., Seib, P. A., Ward, A. B., & Deyoe, C. W. (1985). Noodles Vickery, J. R. (1968). The recovery and utilisation of edible protein from
IV. Influence of flour protein, extraction rate, particle size, and blood and trash fish. Food Technology in Australia, 20, 315–319.