II

Charged and held accountable

v.
accused and held responsible

When you are presented with an “offer” it is not yet a true bill in commerce, or that is to say a “firm offer.”
You must first comprehend the true nature of a “firm offer” and “firm” being the “Law firm” representing
the corporation making the offer. These corporations and representatives are “unregistered” foreign agents.
So them being unregistered foreign agents, they cannot make anything but erroneous presentments and
what would be “theory liens” without first going through the proper channels in order for it to be
considered a “firm offer” or that is to say a “true bill in commerce.” Being “unregistered foreign agents,
they must have someone to vouch for them [the Secretary of State]. A firm offer be a signed affidavit,
notarized and apostilled in order to be a “true bill in commerce.” Then and only then can it be “accepted” or
accepted for value and returned for settlement. Anything else is an erroneous presentment. If and when you
receive an erroneous presentment, it needs to be returned by a notary with instructions for proper service. If
you accept and return anything else, you are accepting the fact that it is not a legitimate offer and their
status as unregistered agents and acquiescing to their assailment against you. As it is, they are obstructing
commerce and commencing an act of war against you [piracy] and you must conduct yourself as such and
give them the opportunity to correct their actions. Your Notary is your consul, or mediator with the foreign
adversary, and you should not communicate with the adversary directly in any way. If the adversary
corrects their action by sending the signed affidavit, notarized and appostilled to the notary, you can then
and only then accept it for value and return for settlement as a “true bill in commerce. If they do not, then it
is WAR. Time to take action and move to take some assets.

Charged and held accountable

v.
accused and held responsible

When they send you the bill, ticket, Charge, IRS, whatever, they are sending you the margin call
[statement=accusation] which is their responsibility to satisfy, they are over extended in derivatives. They
have NOTHING!!!!, it is identity theft, counterfeiting securities, and insider trading. [We are NOT their
Clerical Administrators, that is why they are called “Public Servants!!!] If you ask for the original
assessment and the certified audit trail of all transactions for the original voucher expressly allowing for the
back-end copy, imad, omad, disposition and all disbursement documents /receipts/ 1099oid/ 1099int..[Bid
Bond, performance bond, payment bond]..ect.

GSA Form 24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond”
is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A. and put out by the General Services Administration which is
abbreviated GSA. The GSA is under the “Comptroller of the Currency” which is under the GAO, the
“General Accounting Office”. O.K. you have two sets of Bonds: SF274, SF275 & SF275A. At the
Federal Level you have SF273, SF274 & SF275.
Also be sure to ask for the signed, certified verification of assessment and name of the registered public
accounting firm and name of auditor who assessed the “Charges”, credentials, oath, Name and contact
information

Go to List of sureties. Why would they have a list of sureties in a federal district court? When you click on
this HYPERLINK http://www.FMS.Treas.Gov www.FMS.Treas.Gov it takes you to This is department
of treasury. Then you will see on from Walter Burien who has researched and spoken out about the CAFR,
Combined Annual Financial Report of cities and counties, the 'hidden set of books.': optional bids, it's all
spelled out. The insurance companies are the weak link. They have the true liability. They also by SEC and
Fiduciary law must disclose in their annual financial report any lien, encumbrance, claim, or judgment
giving the dollar amount liability and a short description (clear and comprehensive) of the liability
(Sarbanes Oxley Act). They also are holding trillions of dollars of real investment assets (real estate and
property) of which are subject to patent attachment by claim. They truly are the weakest link.
 Believe it or not, George Bush signed into law the “Sarbanes-Oxley act”, It is an amendment to the 1934
securities exchange act. He has given you an out.

Go read it. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, H.R. 3763 One hundred and seventh congress, second session,
Amendment to the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which he characterized as "the most far reaching reforms of American
business practices since the time of Franklin Delano Roosevelt." The Act mandated a number of reforms to
enhance corporate responsibility, enhance financial disclosures and combat corporate and accounting fraud,
and created the "Public Company Accounting Oversight Board," also known as the PCAOB, to oversee the
activities of the auditing profession. The full text of the Act is available at: HYPERLINK
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/goodbye.cgi?www.law.uc.edu/CCL/SOact/soact.pdf"
http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/SOact/soact.pdf. (The SEC does not control or maintain this site.) You can
find links to all Commission rulemaking and reports issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:
HYPERLINK "http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/sarbanes-oxley.htm" http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/sarbanes-
oxley.htm
.

Washington Office, 1666 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006-2803

Phone: (202) 207-9100, Fax: (202) 862-8430

New York Office, 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020
Phone: (646) 437-5100, Fax: (646) 792-0001

Enforcement

Section 105 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 grants the PCAOB broad investigative and disciplinary
authority over registered public accounting firms and persons associated with such firms. To implement
this authority, Section 105(a) directs the Board to establish, by rule, fair procedures for the investigation
and discipline of registered public accounting firms and associated persons of such firms. As directed by
the Act, the Board adopted rules relating to investigations and adjudications on Sept. 29, 2003. The
Securities and Exchange Commission approved the rules on May 14, 2004.

Adopting Release - PCAOB 2003-015

Investigations and Adjudications

Under the adopted rules, the Board and its staff may conduct investigations concerning any acts or
practices, or omissions to act, by registered public accounting firms and persons associated with such firms,
or both, that may violate any provision of the Act, the rules of the Board, the provisions of the securities
laws relating to the preparation and issuance of audit reports and the obligations and liabilities of
accountants with respect thereto, including the rules of the Commission issued under the Act, or
professional standards. The Board’s rules require registered public accounting firms and their associated
persons to cooperate with Board investigations, including producing documents and providing testimony.
The rules also permit the Board to seek information from other persons, including clients of registered
firms.

When violations are detected, the Board will provide an opportunity for a hearing, and in appropriate cases,
impose sanctions designed to deter a possible recurrence and to enhance the quality and reliability of future
audits. The sanctions may be as severe as revoking a firm’s registration or barring a person from
participating in audits of public companies. Lesser sanctions include monetary penalties and requirements
for remedial measures, such as training, new quality control procedures, and the appointment of an
independent monitor.
PCAOB Center for Enforcement Tips, Complaints and Other Information
PCAOB Center for Enforcement Tips, Complaints and other Information

What Happens After I Send Information to the PCAOB?

We will thoroughly review and evaluate the information you provide so that the appropriate PCAOB office
can respond accordingly. For example, staff in the Division of Enforcement and Investigations will
carefully evaluate complaints and tips concerning possible violations, by registered public accounting firms
or their associated persons, of the Act, the rules of the PCAOB or other applicable law, and take whatever
action they deem necessary and appropriate.

Please be aware that federal law prohibits the PCAOB and its staff from disclosing information about its
investigative and enforcement activity unless and until a public proceeding results. In addition, the PCAOB
conducts its investigations on a confidential basis to preserve the integrity of its investigative process as
well as to protect persons against whom unfounded charges may be made or where the PCAOB determines
that enforcement or other action is not warranted. Therefore, we may be unable to share with you
information concerning any action we take to follow up on the information you provide. We do, however,
appreciate any information you provide as its helps the PCAOB fulfill its mission under the Act. Be sure to
ask in your discovery for the “name” and contact information of the auditor whom has assessed the
“Charges” as you must have this information for your “report” to the PCAOB.

UNDERTAKING

put together your discovery disclosure (Demand for Bill of Particulars, Letter of undertaking..ect.) for what
ever it might be to whoever the pirate minion may be. Be as elaborate as you may see necessary with the
discovery. Do not forget your negative averment:
One has seen NOTHING that resembles ANYTHING that would establish a verified valid claim nor has
One seen any evidence of a pre-existing contract ( this would be the application your mother filled out for
your birth certificate and is voidable as it arises from presumption also) or any additional information in the
public record that would indicate any obligation or liability one may have regarding this matter.

Heads Up Lewis!!! [when you get your docs notarized, use a foreign Consulate Notary, Makes it
international] GET A COPY OF THE “LOG BOOK” FOR THE EVIDENCE FILE. Have your docs sent
by Notary seal. Now this is a very important point to understand, when you are looking for a claim on
which relief can be granted, that is to say “where is it written in stone?”. When a law is passed through
legislation, it is not “valid” until it is “verified” by the archivist in the federal register “LOGGED”. The
notary is the “archivist” and this is where he gets the power to supersede the court and the judge, when his
“LOG” is entered into EVIDENCE. How many times have you had something notarized and did not get the
most important piece of paper for your process to succeed [[[“The copy of the Notary’s LOG!!]]] This is
your verified witness replacing the presumption with fact! This is “the why” as the Merovingian so
eloquently states in the matrix, this is what gives it Power, a “Claim” upon which relief can be granted”.

Morpheus: We are looking for the Keymaker.

Merovingian: Oh yes, it is true. The Keymaker, of course. But this is not a reason, this is not a `why.' The
Keymaker himself, his very nature, is means, it is not an end, and so, to look for him is to be looking for a
means to do... what?

Neo: You know the answer to that question.

Merovingian: But do you? You think you do but you do not. You are here because you were sent here, you
were told to come here and you obeyed. [Laughs] It is, of course, the way of all things. You see, there is
only one constant, one universal, it is the only real truth: causality. Action. Reaction. Cause and effect.

Morpheus: Everything begins with choice.

Merovingian: No. Wrong. Choice is an illusion, created between those with power, and those without .
Look there, at that woman. My God, just look at her. Affecting everyone around her, so obvious, so
bourgeois, so boring. But wait... Watch - you see, I have sent her dessert, a very special dessert. I wrote it
myself. It starts so simply, each line of the program creating a new effect, just like poetry. First, a rush...
heat... her heart flutters. You can see it, Neo, yes? She does not understand why - is it the wine? No. What
is it then, what is the reason? And soon it does not matter, soon the why and the reason are gone, and all
that matters is the feeling itself. This is the nature of the universe. We struggle against it, we fight to deny
it, but it is of course pretense, it is a lie. Beneath our poised appearance, the truth is we are completely out
of control. Causality. There is no escape from it, we are forever slaves to it. Our only hope, our only peace
is to understand it, to understand the `why.' `Why' is what separates us from them, you from me. `Why' is
the only real social power, without it you are powerless. And this is how you come to me, without `why,'
without power. Another link in the chain. But fear not, since I have seen how good you are at following
orders, I will tell you what to do next. Run back, and give the fortune teller and give her this message: Her
time is almost up. Now I have some real business to do, I will say adieu and goodbye.

we can see that the “why” is the truth (reason), “Presumption” or the assessment is what makes the
separation, extinguish the “Presumption” and you extinguish the separation. Replacing presumption with
fact.

This is also the “why” they have been labeling material as “paper terrorism” you have not actually done
anything except threaten them [terrorism]. This is the same thing they are doing, saying “I have a witness,
but they’re not here, or this is what this “statue says”…LOL.. Remember Heresy? Do not ever cross the
judge, he is not the adversary, the minion pirate is. You would not approve of punching the referee in a
boxing match would you? It is not his fault you have been getting your ass kicked.
Get certified mailing with insured 55.00 for the Notary. [in order for post office to “retain” record also]
“more evidence.’ The US postal service is part of the UPU, Universal Postal Union in Berne Switzerland.

And your disclaimer of course:

One rescinds any and all prior endorsements, declines any and all offers to contract, and reserves the right
to reject any and all bids and does not concede to any presumptions. One is not the beneficiary of any
compelled benefits arising out of any contract or agreement with the US, UNITED STATES, USA, STATE
OF WASHINGTON,..ect. Errors and omissions: One is not accountable for the errors and omissions of the
offerer and offerers’ partners known and unknown. One is lacking “the essential basic elements” to
formulate a valid assessment; from such a disadvantage; based upon this truth; A presumption arising from
duplicity must be viewed as “Voidable” for lack of the essential basic elements.

Something that you MUST comprehend, when someone comes to equity with unclean hands, it is like
pouring two glasses of water in a bowl, there is no way to distinguish the difference between the two
glasses of water, the pirate with “unclean hands can NO Longer hold equity, ALL their equity now belongs
to you. You could get a private investigator to do a search on your adversary’s assets, put a claim against
all of it and put this with your evidence and counterclaim. [hence “The age of Aquarius].

If you want to use their own exploitation methods against them and put them into total ruin [for those with
vengeance in their hearts and minds] here you go.

“THE CRUCIFICTION”

Send out your “Notarized” discovery response [TIMELY] under Notary Seal, certified and insure it for
over fifty notes, that creates a record in the Swiss owned postal service “US post office”.
Now set up a web site. Post all documentation [evidence], mailing receipts on the site. MAIN PAGE, not a
LINK.
Now get a newspaper ad in, let’s say oh maybe “The New York Times?” [the capital of their world] as
“Private Notice” to whom ever the little Pirata parasites are whom are causing the heartache, or any whom
presents may come and be seen or Known. Example:

“One’s Appellation”
PRIVATE NOTICE
To; whom presents may come and be seen or known.

HYPERLINK "http://www.thecrucifixtion.com"
www.thecrucifixtion.com

You could post an ad in the local city wherever they’re corporate headquarters are, and also mention their
name, and/or name of the CEO. Post a copy of your newspaper ad on the web site also, receipts, anything
else pertinent. The bigger the newspaper ad, the more expense, it just needs to be simple and pointed.

Also you could send a copy of your newspaper ad to:: “Right From their web site”……..The FASB’s
Technical Inquiry Service. The FASB’s mission is to establish and improve standards of financial
accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including companies that issue
financial statements, their auditors, and readers of those financial statements. In line with that mission, the
FASB staff provides the Technical Inquiry Service to answer questions about existing FASB literature. We
welcome hearing from you because your question may help us identify ways we can make our accounting
standards easier to use and understand.The mission of the Financial Accounting Standards Board is to
establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the
public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.
Counterclaim – If you have two claims that arise from the same transaction under Rule 13, you have to do a
mandatory counterclaim. If you do not do a mandatory counterclaim, which is a setoff, a recoupment, you
lose it because you “waived” it. Now they are going to address their claim that you have already made a
general appearance, thus giving them venue and jurisdiction, and they are going to impose liability on you.
Where is their lien? Where is their bond?

Recoupment –

Duhlos v. Truman, 2000 to 2003. Duhlos tried to take a barge down the canal, which was not deep enough
and wound up on a sandbar. Then he tried to do a Quiet Title under abandoned property. The judge said
that he had to post a bond if he wanted to pursue the matter. (escrow account) The bond replaces you. You
have to be a lien holder or claimant to bring a claim in admiralty. See Catrona case. You can do it by
judgment or execution.

1975-1980 Corpus Juris Secundum, in the footnotes it states that the recognizance bond used by all of the
courts comes from the old English Admiralty. Stipulations and Bonds, Sections 156-160; 2003 revision
deleted this information. A letter of Undertaking or a Stipulation is the same thing as a bond.

What you are doing is bringing a chosen action against yourself as the res in an in rem proceeding in
Admiralty.

Now, Not IF, But when they default, immediately file a counter suit [“IN FEDERAL COURT!”]. File your
material in an “Evidence file” not the “case file”. One has heard of something about “a miscellaneous file”
that has some further impact, [this must be further researched as One has no real knowledge of it]

Subject: Public Policy Court vs Constitutional Court

Here in Austin Texas there is a US District Court for the Western District of Texas. This court has a
public policy side and an invisible Constitutional side. This discovery was made a couple of months ago by
my friend Mike, but the lawsuit that he filed on the Constitutional Side of the court was dismissed because
Mike didn't have standing to file it! Case dismissed. Mike helped another friend file a lawsuit on the
Constitutional Side Of the US District Court today. The clerks kept telling them they didn't know what he
was talking about. Mike and his friend kept demanding the lawsuit be filed into the Misc. file. The clerks
finally said "Oh you want a Constitutional court". His reply was, "yes" The case was filed under Misc.
filing section of the court computer system. It was also referred to as the Green file by the clerk of the
court. The normal filing fee in a US District Court is $150, but the Constitutional filing fee is $39. The
man filing it had only $40 with him and they demanded exact filing fee. He told them to keep the other
dollar for there coffee fund and they filed it to the Misc. Green file for the Article III Constitutional Court.
After they got the lawsuit filed the clerk or whomever called security and had them escorted off the
property. I was at Dessie's house talking about some other legal things when Mike call to tell her what
happen there, we were on a speaker phone. If this can happen at the US District Court in Austin, Texas it
has to be that way in ever US District Court in this land. We strongly feel that is where our remedy is for all
our violations of our rights. I will be taking my mortgage fight to this Constitutional Court within days and
let them criminals squirm!!!! Specify the Green File!!!!!!! It probably gets heard by a Supreme Court
Jusice who sits in the District periodically!??!! From: <mailto:
HYPERLINK "http://us.f407.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?
To=sz6696@earthlink.net&YY=54999&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b"
sz6696@earthlink.net
Steve Zinser

When you get into court, and you are addressed, recite the disclaimer written above and tell the Judge “I am
just here to Collect” then say in response to any statements they may make, “What relevance does that have
at this time, on this matter your Honor, when they are in default? “Is the court prepared to make a
determination on this matter at this time?” [“in your best Erkel voice”…LOL]. This is your pat cliché for
ANYTHING they might have to say in regards to the “Matter”…LOL…they have just been burned to the
ground, commercially dead!!!! “Crucified” they cannot win, like One said, “they’ve got NOTHING!” If the
judge dishonors this request, it may be because he is testing you and will press the matter (which he is
entitled to do twice, but on the third time it’s “three strikes and you’re out”). In such case you can ask:
“Are you sure?” The first wrong may be regarded as inadvertence; the second wrong constitutes intent; the
third wrong signifies malice. Consequently, you may have to press your issue three (3) times.

Now , Mr. Corporate Giant, mr. judge, mr. banker, mr. policeman, mr. prosecutor, mr. credit collector,
credit reporting agency, mr. electric company, mr. cable company, or mr. IRS, or whomever else presents
may come and be seen or Known or be cluttering your mail box with their trash NO longer have any
immunity. Once you have the website, you can keep adding victims.

Example Foia:

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT / REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION/COUNTER CLAIM FOR

FORFEITURE OF BOND:

Michael Stevenson, Director of Securities, Dept of financial institutions Washington State Securities
division, 150 Israel Rd. Tumwater, WA. 98501

Sean M.P. Parrent, City Attorney, (Complainant) WSBA 30087, City of Lakrwood, Wa.

Certified Mail # 7002 0460 0001 1155 2979

Attention: Michael Stevenson, Director of Securities, Sean M.P. Parrent, City Attorney.
This is a request made in the nature of both the Freedom of Information pursuant to the freedom of
information legislation 5 U.S.C. § 552: to promote transparency and to ascertain the civil commission
enabling the below named agents as members of the government; the following data is herein requested.
This request does meet all procedural requirements in the nature of USC 15, Ch. 2B, § 77k, 78u, RCW
21.20, 31 CFR Subtitle A Part 1, Appendix B, Subpart C, Appendix B; 26 CFR 601.702, 5 U.S.C. § 552;
26 CFR §§ 601.701 & 601.702; and 26 U.S.C. § 6103.and also those listed in the Federal Register., Supp.
Rules of Admiralty, Rule 8.
And:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, H.R. 3763 One hundred and seventh congress, second session, Amendment
to the 1934 Securities Exchange Act.
On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which he characterized
as "the most far reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt." The Act mandated a number of reforms to enhance corporate responsibility, enhance financial
disclosures and combat corporate and accounting fraud, and created the "Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board," also known as the PCAOB, to oversee the activities of the auditing profession.
Records Request

One is requesting that you submit all requested documentation in the nature of the assigned name and
identifying number, as shown below, pertaining to the period of October 23, 2003 through present.

(1.) The Bonding information and registration statement and name of the transfer agent (CUSIP no. and
assessment, omid, omad, 1099OID, 1099INT for any and all “Charges”) in regards to: John E. Liberty and
Originating Case no. 057690366, Case No. 3-001006, and 3-001007 LKP, agency No. 03270366, Credit
item No. 63539, Lakewood municipal court, and authentication of authority (Oaths of office and bonding
information) of Credit item signatory MILLER, DARIN E., Sean M.P. Parrent, City Attorney
(Complainant), WSBA 30087 and the generated the commercial instruments:

(2.) GSA Form 24 “Bid Bond”,

(3.) The “Performance Bond” form SF25

(4.) The “Payment Bond” form SF25A.

under the “Comptroller of the Currency” under the GAO, the “General Accounting Office”.

(5.) The signed, certified verification of assessment and name of the registered public accounting firm and
name of auditor who assessed the “Charges” ,credentials, oath, Name and contact information.

[O.K. you have two sets of Bonds: SF274, SF275 & SF275A. At the Federal Level you have SF273,
SF274 & SF275. ]

(6.) Please Provide the state 28-E agreements between the state and federal governments to secure grants
from the fed and to insure compliance with federal law by the state and the yearly compliance statement to
the fed., showing among others that the state is in compliance with federal law and exactly where and how
one is party to these agreements.
(7.) As the Washington Bar Association is an “instrumentality of Washington”, being external to the
government, how does the Washington Bar Association have any standing in any of the three branches of
government? Please clarify.

(8.) Please clarify exactly where in the Washington State Securities Act RCW 21.20 the Credit item
signatory MILLER, DARIN E., Sean M.P. Parrent, City Attorney, (Complainant) WSBA 30087 are
eligible to engage in securing a “Bond” in a name in resemblance to Ones ordinate appellation John E.
Liberty without One’s Knowledge or authorization, and exactly where it is provided that the prosecuting
attorney may act as Investment adviser representative, and withhold the information pertaining to the name
of the “holder and bonding agent/transfer agent” as well as the value and accounting of said bond as
described in [RCW 21.20.005 Definitions] and then attempt to hold One “allegedly” accountable for such
act while withholding One’s Property.
In one fashion or another, One has received correspondence from or have otherwise had direct contact with
each LAKEWOOD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION’S officer’s or agent’a named above. Per FEDERAL
CROP INSURANCE CORP. v. MERRILL ET AL., (1947) 332 U.S. 380; 68 S. Ct. 1; 92 L. Ed. 10, at 384,
"Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the
Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government
stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress
or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. And this is so
even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority. See,
e. g., Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389, 409; United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60,
70, and see, generally, The Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666." Therefore, One is in need of verifying that
said personnel named above are who they say they are and have authority they have exercised or are
attempting to exercise.
Please send the following items for:
(8.) Signatory MILLER, DARIN E., (9.) Sean M.P. Parrent, City Attorney, (Complainant) WSBA 30087
The precise title of each officer, agent or employee named above and cite the section of the act of Congress
that created the office or offices they occupy;
The constitutional oath of office taken by each officer, agent or employee named above, as required by
Article VI, Paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the United States, 1 Stat 23, and 5 U.S.C. § 3331;
A copy of the properly executed civil commission of each officer, agent or employee named above that
verifies that he or is an officer or agent of Government of the United States, as required by Article II § 3 of
the Constitution of the United States and attending legislation;
The personal affidavit declaring that each officer, agent or employee named above did not pay for or
otherwise make or promise consideration to secure the office (5 U.S.C. § 3332);
The personal surety bond of each officer, agent or employee; and
Documentation that establishes the complete line of delegated authority for each officer, agent or employee
named above, including all intermediaries such as the Assistant Commissioner (International), beginning
with the President of the United States.

Conclusion and Demand

Please comply with response time requirements prescribed by 26 CFR § 601.702.

This FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT / PRIVACY ACT REQUEST must be made a permanent part
of all civil and/or criminal, active and/or inactive, existing records and/or files, for Account# No. /
Originating Case no. 032980366,

If the requested documents are not kept at the Secretary State securities Division, please forward this
request to the office where they are located, as required in the nature of House Report 105-37 of the 105th
Congress: “A requester is not required to identify the specific system of records that contains the
information being sought. It is sufficient to identify the agency that has the records. Using information
provided by the requester, the agency will determine the system of records that has the files that have been
requested.”

The requested documents are intended for use in Administrative as well as Judicial proceedings, therefore
please certify the requested documents as True and Correct using Form 2866 (Certificate of Official
Record). If the requested documents do not exist, please certify that they do not, by using Form 3050
(Certificate of Lack of Records). If there are any fees for searching for, or copying any of the requested
documents, please inform One of them.. Waiver or Reduction of Fees - Documents shall be furnished
without charge, or at reduced charges if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is
likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government,
and is not primarily in the operations or activities of the government, and is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester. 15 CFR § 4.9 (c)
I understand the penalties for requesting information under false pretenses. I believe that the documents
requested herein are publicly available within the custody of your Commissions Office, and not exempt or
excluded under the nature of any statue, e.g. “the documents are not exempt under in the nature of
exemption (b) (5) as they represent a purely factual record of the agency’s post decisional file in this
matter.” I also believe that reasonable grounds do not exist for withholding, as provided in nature of
subsection (a) (4) (F) of the Act’s penalties section.

Notice is hereby given that if you fail to produce any of the requested documents within 10 days of receipt
of this letter, your failure to do so shall be construed as prima facia evidence that you are unable to do so
and shall create the legal presumption that the requested documents do not exist. If you desire an extension
of time, please request it in writing.

In good faith I am also providing notice that, in the nature of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring
and Reform Act (Section 1203, P.L. 105-206 you are required to comply with the Internal Revenue Code,
the Internal Revenue Manual(s), Treasury Regulations, and all other Internal Revenue Service policies and
procedures

Background: According to IRM 3(17)(46)1.1 Scope (1) Non-Master File is a process of accounting for
assessments, liabilities, payments, debits and credits.

Request: Please send Requester true and correct, clearly legible, untampered copies of the front and back
of all existing record(s) and/or document(s) of the Non-Master File and Comments Field maintained in a
system of Records known as Integrated Data Retrieval System/IRS 34.018, that are specific to the above
referenced assigned entity name with the above referenced Account number.

Errors and omissions: authorized representative John E. Liberty rescinds any and all prior endorsements,
declines any and all offers to contract, and reserves the right to reject any and all bids and does not concede
to any presumptions. One is not the beneficiary of any compelled benefits arising out of any contract or
agreement with the US, UNITED STATES, USA, STATE OF WASHINGTON,..ect. Errors and omissions:
One is not accountable for the errors and omissions of the offerer and offerers’ partners known and
unknown. One is lacking “the essential basic elements” to formulate a valid assessment; from such a
disadvantage; based upon this truth; A presumption arising from duplicity must be viewed as “Voidable”
for lack of the essential basic elements.

Thank you in advance for your offer of communications and assistance..

Endorsement: __________Date: _____________ a.d. 2004
without recourse

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

On ______________, 2003, before this agent and acting notary public in and for the state of Washington ,
John E. Liberty did prove to this agent on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the living principal and
authorized representative whose capacity of operation for the registered trade-names/trademarks did
subscribe and swear to this agent within this instrument and acknowledged to this agent that John E.
Liberty did operate the same in the official authorized capacity and that by John E. Liberty autograph on
the instrument as the living principal whom operated & endorsed this instrument.

Witness my hand and official seal. ____________________________________________ My

commission expires___________
Signature of Satoru Shimizu

…湥潤獲摥琠楨⁳ 湩瑳畲敭瑮 മ圍瑩⁳ 獳洠⁹慨摮愠摮漠晦捩⁳ 敳污 彟彟彟彟彟彟

湯楳獩浭潣⁹⁳ ††彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟彟
慮杩匠††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††ൟ 彟彟彟彟彟獥物灸攠
 ठउ  ††††
‍ ‍ 畺
† ഍‍ ‍ 業楨匠畲潴慓漠敲畴
⁦ ⁦⁦
††††††††††††††††††
഍
††祍挠浯業獳潩硥楰敲彳彟彟彟彟彟‍††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††楓湧瑡牵⁳ 景匠瑡
牯⁵桓浩穩
൵ഠ഍††††††उउ††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††
†††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††̍഍
ഄ̍
PAGE
PAGE
uZuZGZu‹
www.FMS.Treas.Gov
www.FMS.Treas.Gov
http://www.fms.treas.gov/
http://www.fms.treas.gov/
www.thecrucifixtion.com
www.thecrucifixtion.com
http://www.thecrucifixtion.com/
http://www.thecrucifixtion.com/
Normal
Normal
Heading 2
Heading 2
Default Paragraph Font
Default Paragraph Font
Hyperlink
Hyperlink
Normal (Web)
Normal (Web)
listhead1
listhead1
Footer
Footer
HTML Preformatted
HTML Preformatted
HTML Typewriter
HTML Typewriter
Body Text 2
Body Text 2
Body Text 3
Body Text 3
Page Number
Page Number
¤言¤言¦言¦言§言§言©言ª言¬言言¯言°言É言Ì言
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

winstonDC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\My Documents\Cache\Accountable.doc

winstonfC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of
Accountable.asd
winstonfC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of
Accountable.asd
winstonDC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\My Documents\Cache\Accountable.doc
winstonfC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of
Accountable.asd
winstonfC:\Documents and Settings\Winston\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of
Accountable.asd
8RîQN{4=
Unknown
Unknown
Arthur-Edward: Leeÿ＂
Times New Roman
Times New Roman
Symbol
Symbol
Arial Unicode MS
Arial Unicode MS
Verdana
Verdana
Courier New
Courier New
Wingdings
Wingdings
kThe Son of God walked into the cocktail lounge at the pearly gates, the way stone asks
kThe Son of God walked into the cocktail lounge at the pearly gates, the way stone asks “ what will you
have
Lex luxor
winston
Lex luxor
winston
The Son of God walked into the cocktail lounge at the pearly gates, the way stone asks “ what will you
have
Lex luxor
Normal
winston
Microsoft Word 9.0
Gaspar elan
The Son of God walked into the cocktail lounge at the pearly gates, the way stone asks “ what will you
have
_PID_HLINKS
http://us.f407.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?
To=sz6696@earthlink.net&YY=54999&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b
http://us.f407.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?
To=sz6696@earthlink.net&YY=54999&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b
http://www.thecrucifixtion.com/
http://www.thecrucifixtion.com/
http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/sarbanes-oxley.htm
http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/sarbanes-oxley.htm
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/goodbye.cgi?www.law.uc.edu/CCL/SOact/soact.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/goodbye.cgi?www.law.uc.edu/CCL/SOact/soact.pdf
http://www.fms.treas.gov/
http://www.fms.treas.gov/
Root Entry
1Table
1Table
WordDocument
WordDocument
SummaryInformation
SummaryInformation
DocumentSummaryInformation
DocumentSummaryInformation
CompObj
CompObj
ObjectPool
ObjectPool
Microsoft Word Document
MSWordDoc
Word.Document.8
Oﾐþ6m58:#k0HsȵN}
zþà„º„œ,qI61bUÑ
FktmJ—.”M]
[VO