Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Sidney Ash
Department of Geology
We.ber State College
Ogden, Utah 84408
INTRODUCTION
The flora of the Early Mesozoic, as used here, is included in what has
been called the Mesophytic flora (Gothan and Weyland, 1954). The
Mesophytic flora is the transitional flora that developed after the older
or Paleophytic flora of the Paleozoic and before the modern Cenophytic
flora. The Paleophytic flora, lasting from the acquisition of the land
habit by plants during the Silurian through the Early Permian, was
dominated by lycopsids, sphenopsids, ferns, and primitive gymnosperms.
The Mesophytic flora which was dominated by advanced gymnosperms,
extended from the Late Permian to about the end of the Early Cretaceous
when the flowering plants became common. The Cenophytic flora continues
to the present and is dominated by the flowering plants.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
144
In his 1973 report Barnar~ shows with the aid of four paleogeographic
reconstructions, that the early Mesozoic floras of the northern hemisphere
generally occur from about 20 degrees north latitude to very close to the
paleonorth pole of the time. Generally they are irregularly distributed
throughout that zone but they seem to be most common in Central Asia and
Siberia during each period.
Early and Middle Triassic floras are fairly scarce and those that are
present are small and occur mainly in western Europe (Grauvogel-Stamm,
1978) and Siberia (Mogutscheva, 1973; Dobruskina, 1982). Interestingly,
none are known in North America and adjacent regions at all. Late
Triassic floras are much more widely distributed than those of the Early
and Middle Triassic. They include large floras in both the eastern
United States (Ash, 1980; Bock, 1969; Cornet and Olsen, 1986; Fontaine,
1883; Ward; 1900) and the western United States (Ash, 1970a, 1972b, 1978,
1980; Daugherty, 1941) as well as in Mexico (Weber, 1986a, b, c) and
Greenland (Harris, 1931, 1932a, b, 1935, 1937; Pedersen and Lund, 1980).
In addition there are many Late Triassic floras in western Europe
(Harris, 1931; Dobruskina, 1982; Krausel, 1959), in all parts of Russia
(Dobruskina, 1970, 1982, 1986), in China (Hsu and others, 1979; Kimura,
1985) and in other parts of Asia including Korea (Kawasaki, 1925, 1926;
Kimura, 1986), Japan (Oishi, 1940; Kimura, 1980, 1985), and Viet-Nam
(Zeiller, 1902; Srebrodolskaja, 1969).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
145
small fragmentary Late Jurassic flora is known from Scotland (Van Der
Burgh and Van Konijnenburg, 1984). In addition several significant Late
Jurassic floras occur in China (Wu and others, 1980, Zhang; 1982).
Surprisingly, only a few small Late Jurassic floras are known from North
America (Bell, 1956; Brown, 1972, 1975) although strata of that age are
fairly widely exposed in the western interior region.
PALEOECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
A review of each of the main groups of land plants present during the
Mesophytic in the northern hemisphere follows. General descriptions of
some of the commonly occurring fossils in the groups are also provided
but the details are necessarily brief. Additional morphological and
anatomical information can be found in recent paleobotanical books (e.g.,
Andrews, 1961; Taylor, 1981; and Stewart, 1983). In this section I
follow the scheme of classification used by Taylor (1981).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
146
Unlike the lycopods the horsetails were somewhat more common in the
early Mesozoic of the northern hemisphere as they consistently occur
tllere in most Mesophytic floras. Generally these plants are most
commonly preserved in overbank deposits in deltaic and estuarian systems.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
147
d e
b
=======================================================================
Arborescent horsetails that are considered to be Paleophytic holdovers
commonly occur in many early Mesophytic floras. Typically they are
referred to the genus Neocalamites (fig. Ie). Stems of this plant which
range up to 40 cm or more in diameter and possibly 6 meters or more in
height OCC\lr commonly in the Late Triassic formations of the southwestern
United States (Ash, 1980). The last well documented occurrence of
Neocalamites seems to be in the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire (Harris,
1961).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
148
more modern appearance than the Paleozoic ferns and most can be assigned
to living families without question. Many of the Early Mesozoic ferns
have pinnate leaves in which the pinnu1es are arranged in two ranks along
the sides of the stems as in the probable Late Triassic fern Pekinopteris
(fig. 2i). Some have leaves in which the pinnu1es extend outward in a
palmate fashion from the top of stems as in the common Early Mesozoic
ferns C1athropteris (fig. 2h) and Phlebopteris (fig. 2j).
One of the first of the new families of ferns to evolve during the
Mesozoic was the Dipteridaceae. This family first appears in the Middle
Triassic of Australia (Webb, 1982). Thereafter it quickly spread
throughout the world as it is quite common in the Late Triassic of North
America and Early Jurassic of Japan and other areas in the northern
hemisphere. Unlike most of the other Mesophytic ferns the leaves in this
family are palmately compound as in C1athropteris (fig. 2h) and
Phlebopteris (fig. 2j). Another important fern family that arose early
in the Mesozoic is the Matoniaceae (Arnold, 1964). This family is found
for the first time in the Late Triassic in the northern hemisphere where
its members became common during the Early and Middle part of the
Jurassic. Subsequently the family seems to have declined significantly
in n\lmbers and variety. The leaves in this family are also pa1amate1y
compound. The most characteristic and widely distributed matoniaceous
fern found in the Late Triassic and Jurassic is Phlebopteris (fig. 2j).
Other Jurassic members of this family are Matonidum and Selenocarpus and
possibly Piazopteris (fig. 2e).
========================================================================
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
149
a d
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
150
As they are now recognized, the early Mesozoic seed ferns of the
northern continents are a small but rather heterogeneous group of plants
that usually have thick leaves and distinctive reproductive structures.
They were never very common in the northern hemisphere during the early
Mesozoic and few, if any, survived there after the Early Cretaceous.
Although many of the organs of these interesting plants are known it is
not yet possible to reconstruct the whole plant. Some of them may have
been shrubs or small trees. The Mesophytic seed ferns of the northern
hemisphere are assigned to three orders: Peltaspermales, Corystospermales
and Caytoniales. The first of these, the Peltaspermales, was a holdover
from the Paleozoic having been rather common in the Late Permian of the
southern continents (Townrow, 1960) and the northern continents
(Dobruskina, 1975). They were minor members of the Late Permian and Late
Triassic floras of Eurasia. However, the order then disappeared rather
suddenly at the end of the Triassic (Dobruskina, 1975). The bipinnate
leaves of these plants are assigned to Lepidopteris (fig. 3b),
Scytophyllum, Vittaephyllum, and other genera including possibly some
species of Callipteris. The seed bearing organ is Peltaspermum and the
pollen-bearing organ is Antevsia (fig. 3c). Pollen grains produced by
this organ are small monosulcate grains (fig. 3c, right).
The Caytoniales is the third family of early Mesozoic seed ferns found
in the northern hemisphere. Members of the family are most common in
Eurasia where they first occur in the latest Triassic (Rhaetian Stage) of
Greenland and Scandinavia (Harris, 1932). Members of the family become
increasingly common in younger strata in Eurasia until they reached their
zenith during the Middle Jurassic. They are particularly common in the
famous Middle Jurassic flora of Yorkshire (Harris, 1964). The family
then declined rapidly and disappeared sometime in the Cretaceous. Some
of the last representatives of the order in the northern hemisphere occur
in the Early Cretaceous (Aptian) rocks of Montana (Lapasha and Miller,
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
151
1985) and in the Early Cretaceous (Albian) of Japan (Kimura, 1975). The
distinctive palmately compound leaves are assigned to Sagenopteris (fig.
3d), the pollen-bearing organ to Caytonanthus (fig. 3e), and the seed-
bearing organ to Caytonia (fig. 3f). The bisacate pollen produced by the
male organ (fig. 3e, right) is assigned to Vitreisporites or Alisporites.
The seeds are small oval bodies without obvious external features (fig.
3f, right).
===========================~===========================================
~A)
0:0 "
f O&J
=======================================================================
Cycads (Division Cycadophyta)
The Mesophytic flora includes a large number of once pinnate and non-
pinnate leaves that were once thought to be fossil representatives of the
living cycads. When it was learned (Nathorst, 1902; Thomas and Bancroft,
1913) that the leaves could be consistently divided into two groups on
the basis of their cuticular structure it was evident that the fossils
actually represented two groups of unrelated plants which are now called
cycads and cycadeoids (sometimes called bennettites). In the stomata of
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
152
the cycads the guard cells are surrounded by three or more so called
subsidiary cells and the cell walls of the epidermis are typically
straight to slightly wavy (see fig. 4b). In the stomata of the
cycadeoids each of the guard cells is flanked by a single subsidiary cell
and the side walls of the epidermal cells are usually sinuous (see fig.
4e). There are other differences. For example, in the living cycads the
reproductive structures are borne at the apex of the stem whereas in the
majority of cycadeoids they are borne on short branches on the sides of
the stems.
The cycads which apparently evolved during the Late Paleozoic were
scarce in terms of numbers and diversity during the Early Mesozoic in
comparison to the cycadeoids. During the Triassic the cycads were
present in the northern hemisphere in very small numbers. The group
became somewhat more common there during the Jurassic and Early
Cretaceous but then declined rather abruptly. Most of the Early Mesozoic
cycads had pinnate leaves such as the Upper Triassic form Bjuvia and the
Jurassic forms Ctenis, Pseudoctenis (fig. 4c) and Paracycas. Some had
non-pinnate leaves that are called Nilssonia (fig. 4a). Generally cycad
leaves are fairly large. For example some specimens of Nilssonia are at
least one meter long and Ctenis may have been as long, if not longer.
Cycad reproductive structures include Palaeocycas from the Upper Triassic
and Beania and Androstrobus (fig. 4a) from the Middle Jurassic.
Apparently none of the Early Mesozoic cycads had very large trunks. The
oldest known cycad stems occur in the Late Triassic of North America and
show two different growth forms (Ash, 1985). In Charmorgia the stem is
short and squat and probably was no more than 30 em tall whereas in
Lyssoxylon and Leptocycas (fig. 4d) the stems are slender and may have
been a meter or more in height (Ash, 1985). A recent reconstruction of
Leptocycas by Delevoryas and Hope (1971) shows it to have had a crown of
leaves and many persistent leaf bases on the lower parts of the stem
(fig. 4d). Harris (1961a) suggested that the plant which bore the leaf
Nilssonia tenuinervis and the pollen cone Androstrobus wonnacotti had a
slender branched stem (fig. 4a). Many of the cycads in the Mesophytic
flora probably grew along the banks of streams and lakes in deltas and on
floodplains. The presence of cycads in a flora seems to indicate a hot,
moist climate (Vakhrameev, 1971).
=======================================================================
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
153
~
~ 9
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
154
Although this division may have evolved sometime during the Middle
Triassic or earlier, the oldest confirmed remains occur in the Carnian
Stage of the Late Triassic at several places in the northern hemisphere
(Ash, 1980). The order then expanded and diversified and became a
dominant in the land flora of the northern hemisphere during the Middle
Jurassic (Harris, 1973). The most common pinnate leaves in the Late
Triassic and Jurassic are Otozamites (fig. 4j) and Zamites (fig. 4k).
Others are Pterophy1lum (fig. 41), Ptilophyllum and Anomozamites. In the
Early Jurassic the genus Dictyophyllum (fig. 4h) appeared and then became
common in the Middle Jurassic. Nilssoniopteris (fig. 4i) is the name
generally applied to non-pinnate leaves in the Mesophytic flora.
Reproductive structures include Wielandiella (fig. 4f) and Williamsonia
(fig. 4g). They first occur in the Late Triassic and another,
Weltrichia, appears in the Middle Jurassic. The foliage and reproductive
structures are generally scarce in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous
whereas cycadeoid stems, which are uncommon in the Triassic and most of
the Jurassic, are common in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous.
Limited evidence suggests that the majority of the Late Triassic-Middle
Jurassic plants in this order had a slender branching habit as shown in
fig. 4m (Delevoryas and Hope, 1976). Squat fleshy cycadeoid trunks first
appear in the Late Jurassic at a few localities in Utah, Wyoming and New
Mexico and on the Isle of Portland in England where they were once called
"fossil birds nests". Such trunks are particularly common in the Early
Cretaceous of Maryland and many western states as well as in several
European countries (Wieland, 1906, 1916). These in situ occurrences are
found preserved in floodplain and delta deposits mainly but some of the
English ones are in coastal deposits (Francis, 1983). The presence of
cycadeoids in the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous floras of the USSR
suggest a hot, moist climate to Vakhrameev (1971).
Many of the Early Mesozoic taxa, especially those from the Jurassic
and younger strata are assigned to living families. Fossil evidence
indicates that the direct ancestors of the living families appeared one
by one beginning in the Early Jurassic or possibly earlier, and by the
Early Cretaceous all the families were represented by either fossil or
extant genera (Miller, 1977). In general aspect the early Mesozoic
conifers were fairly similar to living conifers and they seem to have had
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
155
similar growth habits ranging from shrubs to large trees. Most of them
also had small scale or needle leaves similar to tbose pf the living and
familiar juniper and pine (see figs. 5a-5h). Both the extinct and living
taxa are mainly differentiated and classified by the morphology and
anatomy of their seed cones which generally have distinctive bract-scale
complexes (e.g., figs. 5j-5w). Many species and genera have been
established on the basis of sterile foliage like that shown in figs. Sa -
5h, and 5x. Since it is usually difficult to determine the relationships
of such fossils they are not discussed here.
Cordaites (Cordaitopsida)
Conifers (Coniferopsida)
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
156
b c
. _'
f 9
@ /'.
..
')
'~tff
• ".J .,/.;,
.
p
o
J kim n
~~~o
StU v w
Figure S. Sterile foliage (a-i, x), seed cone scales (j-n, p-w), and a
cone (0) of certain early Mesozoic conifers. Redrawn from various
sources. a, Pagiophyllum, x2, b, Brachyphy11um, x2, c, E1atoc1adus,
xl, d, Hirmerie11a, x2, e, Frene10psis, x2, f, E1atides, x2,
g, Cupressinoc1adus, x2, h, Stachyotaxus, xl, i, reconstruction of
the Pelourdea plant, xl/20, j, G1ypto1epis, k, Vo1tzia,
1, Pseudovo1tzia, m, Swedenborgia, n, Aethophy11um, 0, Hirmerie11a
cone, xl, p, Hirmeriel1a, q, Stachyotaxus, r, Pa1issya,
s, Araucarites, t, Do1iostrobus, u, Schizo1epis, v, Pa1aeotaxus,
w, Marksea, x, Podozamites, xl.
=======================;=================================================
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
157
and some species of Hirmeriella (fig. 5d), Pagiophyllum (fig. 5a) and
Brachyphyl1um (fig. 5b). The male cone is C1assostrobus and the seed
cone is Hirmeriel1a (figs. 50, 5p). Hirmeriel1a is considered to have
been a arborescent conifer (Taylor, 1981). The family probably included
plants which lived in a variety of habitats including possible halophytic
'mangroves" and had a variety of growth habits, from shrubs to large trees.
Interestingly, xeromorphic characters seem to be present in most species
that have been studied in detail (Alvin, 1982; Watson, 1982). There is
good evidence from the Late Jurassic of England that an arborescent
species lived there under relatively harsh, semi-arid conditions
alongside a hypersaline gulf (Francis, 1983).
Coniferales. This class includes one extinct and six living families.
All of the living families were present during the Early Cretaceous
having evolved at various times during the Triassic and Jurassic (Miller,
1977). Details of their relationships are unclear because of the absence
of critical fossil evidence.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
158
hemisphere include the seed cones Araucarites (fig. 58), Damarites, and
Doliostrobus (fig. 5t), several isolated types of bract-scales, and
various leafy shoots such as some species of Pagiophyllum (fig. 5a).
The Pinaceae appears to have been the most recent family of conifers
to evolve. According to Miller (1977) it seems certain that Pinus had
appeared during the Early Cretaceous as Alvin (1960) has correctly
assigned some seed cones from the Early Cretaceous of Belgium to the
genus. The identification of Cedrus alaskensis from the Early Cretaceous
of Canada by Arnold (1953) also seems to be well founded according to
Miller (1977). Some seed cones called Compsostrobus and associated
pollen cones and foliage from the Late Triassic of North Carolina have
been assigned to the family by Delevoryas and Hope (1973). Miller feels
that the situation with regard to the other fossils assigned to the
family is less certain.
Taxales. -This small extant order may have arisen during the Triassic but
the oldest fossils that can be confidently attributed to it are some
leafy twigs with attached fruits called Palaeotaxus (fig. 5v) from the
Lower Jurassic of Denmark (Florin, 1958). The order is well represented
in the Middle Triassic by several species some of which can be placed in
the modern genera Taxus and Torreya and others which are placed in fossil
genera. These include foliage and seed cones called Marskea (fig. 5w)
and the sterile foliage Storgaardia (Miller, 1977). Additional fossils,
including petrified wood, that can be safely assigned to the order are
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
159
Ginkgoes (Ginkgophyta)
Ginkgoales.- The geologic history of this group goes back to the Early
Permian and fan-shaped leaves that compare very closely with those of the
living genus Ginkgo (fig. 6a) are found in rocks of Late Triassic age and
perhaps in even older ones. Such leaves are known from the latest
Triassic of Ellesmere Island and Greenland (Harris, 1935), the Early
Jurassic of Greenland, the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire (Harris and
Millington, 1974) the Early Cretaceous of Montana (Lapasha and Miller,
1985), and many other Early Mesozoic localities (Stewart, 1983). Several
types of wedge-shaped leaves that are divided into several segments have
also been assigned to the order. The most common of these are Baiera and
Sphenobaiera (fig. 6b). Both occur in some frequency in rocks of latest
Triassic and Jurassic age in the northern hemisphere. A pollen cone and
seeds that compare with those of the living Ginkgo have been described
from the Middle Jurassic of England (see Harris and Millington, 1974).
Incertae Sedis
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
160
the southwestern United States (Brown, 1956; Ash, 1980). The morphology
of the entire plant is fairly well known as several specimens that are in
the position of growth have been described from Colorado (Tidwell, et al.,
1977). It has large, plicate, broadly elliptical leaves that are
helically ~rranged on short narrow stems (fig. 6f). This fossil is of
particular interest because it has been regarded by some authors as an
angiosper~altho\lgh others disagree (e.g., Doyle, 1973). Another
possible pre-Cretaceous angiosperm is Furcula from the latest Triassic in
Greenland (Harris, 1932) and Russia (Hughes, 1976). It is based on
lanceolate leaves that divide in the middle into two segments. Although
the cuticular structure that this plant has occurs in angiosperms it also
occurs in other groups so opinions are divided on the status of this
interesting fossil (Scott, et aI, 1960). The remains of an enigmatic
plant called Dinophyton have been described from many localities in the
Upper Triassic of North America (Ash, 1970b). It includes coniferous-
like foliage and a seed-bearing structure that does not match any other
known seed-bearing structure. All surfaces of the foliage and seed-
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X
161
bearing structure are covered with small sharp hairs (fig. 6g).
Pentoxylon is a Jurassic plant from India that is difficult to classify
even though it is fairly well known (Harris, Bose and Pal, 1985). The
vascular tissue in the stems of this plant is usually divided into five
segments arranged in a ring and the non-pinnate leaves are arranged in a
whorl at the apex of the stem. Because it is so difficult to classify
the Pentoxylon plant is sometimes placed in a distinct group, the
Pentoxyleae. Even less clearly understood is Hermanophyton from the
Upper Jurassic of Utah (Arnold, 1962). The vascular tissue in the stems
of this plant is also divided into segments, a character that is
reminiscent of Pentoxylon. The reproductive structures and foliage of
this plant are not known at this time and its classification is
uncertain.
SUMMARY
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. East Carolina University, on 15 Jul 2018 at 19:54:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027116480000138X