Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
There are still many difficulties for developing the projects of using treated effluents. In this study, the
efficiency of chlorine deoxide in the process of preparing the effluent of Sahebgharanieh Plant of Tehran for
reuse purposes has been determind. Major results are as follows: Total COD reductions resulted from effluent
treatment by ClO2 solutions having concentrations equal to 1/4, 1/2 and 1/1 of COD samples at one hour contact
time have been about 42%, 49% and 59% respectively. Total suspended solids were also reduced by treatment
with ClO2 solutions having the certain concentrations mentioned, and the reductions were about 37% ,47% and
58% respectively. Besides total and fecal coliforms results indicated that ClO2 apllied was quite efficient in
effluent disinfection. The conclusion is that reasonable reductions would be expected in the amounts of remained
major pollutants and so reuse applications for some non-potable purposes may become possible. The
acidification of chlorite has been used for ClO2 generation as it is better suited to small treatment systems.
Key words: Wastewater treatment, chlorine dioxide, chemical oxidation, secondary effluent
*Corresponding Author, E-mail: for_vaezi@yahoo.com
Introduction
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) which was first without inadequate treatment (Eckenfelder and
used in drinking water treatment is an oxidant Bowers, 1994). In particular, oxidation offers
increasingly of interest for industrial and one of the few methods for removing odor,
wastewater treatment (Eckenfelder and color and various potentially toxic organic
Bowers, 1994). It has become a disinfectant substances, often found in wastewaters
alternative to chlorine and ozone because it (Jackman and Powell, 1991). ClO2 is equally
offers the prospect of disinfection without the effective in secondary nonnitrified or nitrified
production of trihalomethanes and bromates so effluents for disinfection purposes and the
it is gaining acceptance as a water treatment increased disinfection effectiveness seen in
promise (Otterholm and Jadesjo, 2000). As an filtered versus nonfiltered wastewaters is not
oxidant, ClO2 is generally considered for reuse accompanied by any significant change in
strategies, because it is more effective than disinfectant demand (WPCF, 1986). In this
chlorine in inactivation of most pathogens article, we discuss the usefulness of ClO2 as a
(Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). Besides, its biocidal disinfectant and chemical oxidant for
properties are not influenced by pH and it is a secondary effluent polishing. ClO2 production
more powerful oxidant than chlorine and so its use for wastewater treatment has not
(Reynolds and Richards, 1996). However, the already been performed in Iran.
findings of Stanford group indicate that ClO2 is
only slightly superior to chlorine as a Materials and Methods
bactericide but it is a much superior virocide. Generating chlorine dioxide
Compared to ozone which is the strogest There are several methods available for
oxidant of the common disinfecting agents, ClO2 generation. For this study, direct acid
ClO2 has the advantages of easier generation in system has been used because it was well
point of use and a longer life of the studied for most small treatment systems
preservation (White, 1992). (White, 1992). This method utilizes the
Interest in ClO2 for chemical waste reaction of a strong acid with sodium chlorite
treatment is of more recent origin to reduce (NaClO2). The following reaction which is
and eliminate the environmental problems most accepted for H2SO4 is:
caused by the discharge of waste streams
F. Vaezi, et al.
10 ClO2 + 5 H2SO4 8 ClO2 + 5 Na2 SO4 + This Plant which is located in north part of
2 HCl + 4 H2O Tehran is an extended aeration system having
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the 2 aeration basins. The wastewater is treated
manual small generation system arranged for with an average flow of 25 m3h-1.
this study. It was also needed to apply a Characteristics of secondary effluent samples
compressed air supply to transfer the generated before and after treatment by ClO2 solutions,
ClO2 gas to the final flask. This flask was put were determined according to the procedures
in an ice bath to preserve the strength of the outlined in the Standard Methods. The tests
prepared stock solution. Both sulfuric and were confined to the determination of total
chloridric acids which were used in the COD, soluble COD, total suspended solids
preliminary tests, showed favorable results and (TSS), total and fecal coliforms which all are
the concentration of ClO2 solutions prepared considered to be the most important pollutants
was enough to use in wastwater treatment. The remained in the secondary effluents of
stock solution was then stored in a glass- conventional plants which do not practice
stoppered dark-colored bottle in a refrigarator. disinfection. The period of this experimental
study was performed in Tehran from January
2000 to July 2001. In this period, the
Sahebgharanieh Plant was often unabled to
produce effluent with BOD and TSS of less
than 20 mgl-1.
Results
Figure 2 shows the results of secondary
effluent treatment in total COD reduction by
ClO2 in different contact times. In Figure 3, the
Figure 1: Manual feed equipment arrangment for efficiencies of COD removal by ClO2 in
generating ClO2 different pHs could be considered in one hour
contact time and results of total and dissolved
1. aspirator flask COD reduction by various amounts of ClO2
2. gas generating bottle (reaction vessel) solution can be seen in Figure 4. Although the
3. collecting bottle containing NaClO2 solution (14g/l) disinfection effect of ClO2 is a well known
4. collecting bottle containing water for gas absorbsion
5. separatory funnel containing 10% H2SO4 phenomena, the efficiency of the treatment in
reduction of both total and fecal coliforms was
Methods of ClO2 control determined. The results of this treatment in 60
As it was already mentioned, ClO2 gas minutes contact time with various
produced in direct acid system was absorbed in concentrations of ClO2 solutions are in Table 1.
enough distilled water. The ClO2 concentration Finaly, Figure 5 shows the results of TSS
thus, prepared can be determined by removal by various amounts of ClO2 solutions
iodometric method as outlined in Standard in one hour contact time.
Methods (APHA, 1995). However, yield Table 1: Reduction of total and fecal coliforms by
determination can be done only when ClO2 treatment of effluent samples
laboratory apparatus for determination of mg/l ClO2 Contact Total Fecal
chlorite and chlorate ions are available, applied
* time coliforms coliforms
because for calculating ClO2 yield by the (min.) (MPN/100ml) (MPN/100ml)
following equation (Aieta and Hernandez,
0 0 100 90
1984), the concentrations of these ions should
C/4 60 <2 <2
have to be known :
C/2 60 2 <2
[ClO2 ] C 60 <2 <2
ClO2 yield = × 100 0 0 80 50
[ClO2 ] + [ClO2- ] + 0.808 [ClO3- ]
C/4 60 2 <2
Wastewater sample and characteristics C/2 60 <2 <2
The samples were collected from C 60 <2 <2
Sahebgharanieh Treatment Plant in Tehran. *C=COD concentration of the effluent sample
98
Application of chlorine dioxide...
60
49 50 51
50 46
42
39 39
40
Total COD removal in 20 min.
Removal
COD
(%)
30 Total COD removal in 45 min.
20 22 Total COD removal in 60 min.
20
10
0
C/4 C/2 C
Injected ClO2 (mg/l)
Figure 2: Total COD removal as a function of injected ClO2 in different contact times
(C= influent COD concentration)
60
49
50 45 47
39 39
COD Removal
40 37 35
31
(%)
28
30
Total COD removal in pH=7.75
0
C/4 C/2 C
Injected ClO2 (mg/l)
60
51 50
50 46 44
COD Removal
39
40 37
(%)
30
0
C/4 C/2 C
Injected ClO2 (mg/l)
Figure 4: Total and dissolved COD removal as a function of injected ClO2 in one hour contact time
(C = influent COD concentration)
99
F. Vaezi, et al.
100
Application of chlorine dioxide...
60 58
50 47
40 36
TSS Removal
30
(%)
10
0
C/4 C/2 C
Injected ClO2 (mg/l)
Jackman, A. P. and R. L. Powell, Hazardous waste WPCF, Wastewater disinfection. MOP-FD-10, 65-
treatment. np: 195-208, 1991 69, 1986
101
F. Vaezi, et al.
98