20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Royal Commissions Into Aged Care & Covid-19-Supplement 4

Page 1
1
2
3 ROYAL COMMISSION INTO AGED CARE 7 COVID-19 1-9-2020
4 covid19submissions@royalcommission.gov.au
5
6 20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ROYAL COMMISSION INTO AGED CARE & COVID-19-Supplement 4
7
8 SUBMISSION-Supplement 4 (UNRESTRICTED)
9 Sir/Madam,
10 on 1-9-2020 at 91.5FM News at 17:00 it was claimed that the number of positive
11 infections were reduced because of the lockdowns, however, in my view this is an absurd claim.
12 They might as well claim that painting a red triangle on a sheep’s back will reduce the number of
13 calf’s that will be born over time. When then no more calf are born they will claim the red paint
14 triangle proved it was working. Never mind the destruction of the sheep skin in the process.
15 We also have a this statement “A senior Victoria Police officer has hit out at “bat s–t crazy”
16 people thumbing their noses at coronavirus rules and peddling dangerous conspiracy theories.”.
17 In my view this labelling of “bat s–t crazy” also is in my view inflammatory and totally
18 uncalled for. I below include my set out to Victorian IBAC about this. After all we never should
19 have the Victorian Police to be political bias and ignore the real issues.
20 .https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/state/vic/2020/08/28/victoria-police-virus-
21 measures/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=PM%20Extra%20-%2020200828
22 QUOTE
23 Mr Cornelius said the protest, planned for September 5, carried a serious risk of undoing the hard work of the vast
24 majority of Victorians through weeks of restrictions.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Yet, this Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius appeared to have no such concern when
28 thousands upon thousands protested a few months ago. It seems that any protest that aligns with
29 the politicians and police views is not a danger as COVID-19 simply respect them and will only
30 affect the parent on the beach with a child with no where around as this parent may have a
31 different political view. I therefore held it appropriate to detail issues, as I view the Victorian
32 Police is a driving force to ensure conflict to exist and to extort people by fines, etc, for doing
33 nothing more but to exercise their constitutional and other legal rights. I therefore have below
34 reproduced 2 correspondences to Victorian IBAC. Which I anticipate may also assist this
35 ROYAL COMMISSION to gain a perhaps better understanding why certain persons may desire
36 to exercise their constitutional and other legal rights and do not accept that a State Government
37 body can unilaterally deny them of any of their constitutional and other legal rights without the
38 sanction of a court. While I am not the kind of person to go onto the streets to demonstrate I view
39 the pen is mightier then the sword, nevertheless I recognise that others may desire to exercise
40 their rights in a different manner, as it is an embedded legal principle in the constitution.
41
42 The Framers of the Constitution recognised that what ever the Parliament did in the debating
43 legislative issues, etc, was to be open for the media to report upon. No secrecy this as it would
44 otherwise prevent a elector to make an “informed” decision who to vote for. In today’s age
45 ordinary citizens have now access to facilities of the Internet and so far more likely to be
1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 “informed” about relevant matters. It would therefore be absurd that those who do so are labelled
2 “conspiracy theorist” where they rely upon numerous scientific and other medical reports. In my
3 view the conduct of Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius is inflammatory and totally
4 uncalled for. The heavy handed police presence and conduct against Mr Solihin Millin as a lone
5 protester versus the many thousands of BLM protesters against whom the police didn’t act may
6 underline the political bias.
7 .
8 https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-rates-
9 or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
10 Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do Not Lead to Reduced COVID Transmission Rates or Deaths, New Study
11 Suggests
12
13 https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=153204
14 World Rising Up Against the Lockdowns As Protests Mount — New World Next Week
15
16 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/brisbane/father-reveals-horrifying-reason-he-believes-his-son-took-his-
17 own-life/ar-BB18v2M1?ocid=msedgdhp
18 Father reveals horrifying reason he believes his son took his own life
19
20 While BLM may have been perceived to stand for the rights of blacks in reality many blacks are
21 opposing BLM as they prove to do anything but protect blacks.
22 .
23 https://news.sky.com/story/trump-attacks-incompetent-portland-mayor-as-biden-accuses-president-of-stoking-
24 war-in-our-streets-12060098
25 Trump attacks 'incompetent' Portland mayor as Biden accuses president of stoking 'war in our streets'
26
27 For about 3 months in Portland the Democrat mayor didn’t as I understand it even try to stop the
28 violence. He even was joining them. However, now a criminal who was released having his
29 latest criminal charges dropped proceeded to kill a man, apparently he was an off duty police
30 officer supporting President Trump re-election, and well was allegedly executed by a person who
31 was a member of BLM and Antifa.
32
33 The Victorian Government and so the Victorian Police also seems to have accepted what ever
34 BLM may desire, including large protest, whereas it goes after a (then) 76 year old man
35 protesting on his own. And we should not wonder if the appeasement by the Victorian
36 Government and the Victorian Police may turn out that the BLM desires to pursue more
37 whatever they make an issue. The very Victorian Police now condoning BLM conduct may just
38 then come to the receiving end of BLM. As more and more both BLM and Antifa are turning out
39 to use legitimate protesters as a cover for their rioting, killings, etc.
40
41 As the violent assault upon me showed, there are persons who will ignore factual issues and that
42 is why it is so dangerous for an Assistant Commissioner to get involved in political disputes. In
43 particular using degrading comments.
44 While to some extend COVID-19 might be a health issue, on the other hand it has been turned
45 into s major political issue where large tech companies the Main Stream Media and government
46 are seeking to clamp down on those exposing the truth, including to have medical doctors
47 deregistered if they speak out.
48 I at times come across a person who has an opposing view then I have and I have the habit of
49 thanking them for expressing it as after all they are as much entitled to express their views as I
50 am mine. However, it must always eventuate in a peaceful manner and avoid intimidations and
51 certainly violence.
52
53 QUOTE 20200831-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC ex C-VO 20-6752-Re PHYSICAL ASSAULT
54 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission 31-8-2020
55 Address: GPO Box 24234, Melbourne VIC 3001
Page 3
1 Telephone: 1300 735 135

2 Email: info@ibac.vic.gov.au
3
4 20200831-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC ex C-VO 20-6752-Re PHYSICAL ASSAULT
5
6 THE ELEBORATE FRAUD PURPETRATED BASED ON A HOAX
7
8 Sir/Madam,
9 on Friday 28 August 2020 I was violently assaulted by another customer at Coles
10 Warringal shopping Centre, Heidelberg, because of not wearing a mask.
11 QUOTE 31-8-2020
12 Coles Warringal mall
From Coles 0545 manager VIC
To admin@inspector-rikati.com
Date Today 13:51
13
14 Good Afternoon Gerrit,
15
16 All our camera footage is kept on record. If there was an incident that the police are dealing
17 with, they will request the footage. We will always do whatever we can do to help the police in
18 any matter they request.
19
20 Thank you
21
22 Regards
23
24 Alexis Cosimi
25 Store Manager | Warringal Mall 0545
26 56 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg 3084
27 E coles.0545.manager@coles.com.au
28 END QUOTEM 31-8-2020
29
30 I below include a copy that was forwarded to Snr Sgt Kim French however resent to Snr Sgt
31 Mark Van Rooyen who appears to have taken over where Snr Sgt Kim French is on leave.
32 It sets out below as to my recollection of events, albeit Coles has indicated it has a recording and
33 will keep this for the Police investigation available.
34 The problem we are facing is that in my view the various Government, the police, the other
35 authorities and persons such as Mr Michael Eburn, PhD and Barrister are spreading
36 disinformation/miss-information by either failing to disclose all relevant details and otr
37 concealing relevant details and/or making allegations upon persons that may induce others to
38 have a perception as to what is legally applicable where in reality this may not be as such.
39 As I indicated in my post to Mr Michael Eburn, PhD and Barrister that his wording of
40 “belligerent” in my view was inappropriate where videos I watched showed that the women did
41 no more but to pursue her constitutional and other legal rights. At about 20.53pm I noticed this
42 post was also removed, albeit I have reproduced a copy of it.
43 Mr Michael Eburn being a Barristor I view ought to be well aware that unlettered persons may
44 view that he is fully aware of what he writes and so may rely upon his writings that indeed a
45 person is “belligerent” where the conduct is shown in a video. An unlettered person may not be
46 aware of the real application of law neither that a Bunnings staff has no legal right to demand a
47 medical certificate. Neither that, as I understand his blog appears to indicate that a person can be
48 denied entry as to whatever a staff member of a business may deem to be applicable.
49 .

Page 4
1 Mask, as I indicated in past writings are deemed harmful to many persons in particular those who
2 then may lack oxygen and indeed dentist refer to them as mouth mask where they cause the
3 wearer to end up with cavities, mouth infections, etc.
4
5 https://www.naturalhealth365.com/mask-mouth-oral-health-3532.html
6 Mask mouth: Dentists issue serious health warning
7
8 In my view no business can implement any conditions of entry that would constitute to inflict
9 “self harm”.
10 I did indicate in my today’s earlier email to the Coles manager:
11 QUOTE
12 In my view it would be advisable that Coles, as I view every business should do, has a sign at the entrance
13 stating that it is important to understand that there may be other customers who may have medical condition
14 not to wear a mask and to respect this.
15 END QUOTE
16
17 People are bombarded with all kinds of messages on radio and television as well as on the
18 internet that people MUST wear a mask, this omitting in general to point out that this is not so at
19 all.
20
21 People who then see a video where the police are violently attacking a woman,
22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHBWbPTAVrA
23 Utter Brutality and Insanity of Victorian Police - Melbourne - Australia
24
25 then may perceive that even so her boyfriend/partner makes clear she has a note from her doctor
26 they then may perceive that the police would know the law and so the police lawfully arrested
27 the woman.
28 .
29 In my view the moment the male person made clear she had been to a doctor (and had a note)
30 then the police ought to have immediately addressed this issue. However, as the video shows the
31 male person was directed to move away. Despite the number of police present they simply
32 ignored to deal with the note issue, or even asked if she had attended to a doctor. In my view the
33 moment the police were alerted that she had attended to a doctor then the police were under a
34 duty to pursue to verify this, failing this they acted in violation to her rights.
35 While I do not know it the male person who attacked me had watched this or any other video, it
36 is however of concern that anyone watching such a video may then have the impression that
37 having a note from a doctor (regardless this is not legally required anyhow (as the website of the
38 Department of Health indicates) then there is no exemption.
39 .
40 Obviously even the Department of Health statement I view is “VAGUE AND ALOOF” in that
41 any person who may suffer from trauma having come from a civil war or other traumatic
42 experiences hardly is to explain in the street or other public place or shopping centre his/her
43 traumatic experiences for anyone to hear. Neither could it be accepted that a person of a certain
44 language somehow could perhaps in proper English explain matters where they are still learning
45 the English language. In my view it would be gross absurdity to expect an unlettered person to
46 give a set out in a form of English that may be deemed acceptable in a Court of Law, when
47 confronted by the police in a public place, etc.
48
49 Not uncommon people come from countries where violence, etc, is exhibited by those claiming
50 to be law enforcement agencies and well when they then see the Victorian Police acting in
51 likewise manner than that just alone might cause trauma uncalled for. If then such a person is
52 stopped by a police officer that to expect this person to give some rational passive
Page 5
1 comprehensive statement outlining the pro’s and con’s of not wearing a mask at the time I view
2 is a gross absurdity. When I observed the video referred to above with this young woman then it
3 appears to me that it was very traumatic to her how the police was towards her and her
4 subsequent language may not be what most persons may deploy but certainly in her own way
5 appeared to make clear she objected.
6 There are at times women feeling from an abusive partner and hardly could be expected then to
7 publicly make some statement as to why such a person is not wearing a mask. And the
8 Department of health clearly provides for such an exemption, just that the Victorian Police itself
9 seems to be dictating the conditions. By this nullifying the very conditions the Department of
10 Health had indicated to apply. The result might be that certain persons subjected to domestic
11 violence now are prevented to escape to a safe heaven because if they cannot have a mask to use
12 to flee the they fear the police might be the next “tormentor”.
13 When a person is in fear of his/her life the last thing they are thinking about is to have some
14 casual passive statement to calmly explain matters risking perhaps some mad/violent person to
15 kill them using a firearm or other instrument.
16
17 Nothing in what I state in my correspondence is intended or be perceived that I somehow accept
18 the application of the STATE OF EMERGENCY and/or STATE OF DISASTER to be
19 applicable regarding any “man-kind” disease named COVID-19
20
21 I on 8 April 2020 commenced with my complaint to the Victorian Ombudsman and subsequently
22 also on 13 April 2020 to the Victorian Human Rights Commission this as I all along was aware
23 that I had to follow proper legal procedures before finally pursuing the involvement of the
24 courts. I never had any doubt that this spread of false/misleading claims about COVID-19
25 eventually would place not only myself but also others at risk of physical harm.
26
27 About 50 years ago I served in the Royal Dutch Army and trained how to deactivate an enemy.
28 About 36 years ago I was faced with a gang leader with his gang to attack my then 1 year old
29 son, and when I haded him to a friend and asked him not to hurt me, he well started on me and I
30 was then entitled to use self defence. I did so using a karate side kick into his groin followed
31 with the side of my flat hand over his mouth causing blood to go everywhere and then the police
32 arrived. A security guard who had witnessed it all informed the police of what had eventuated
33 and the gang leader was arrested. Later he was convicted by the court.
34 With certain martial art training I had I knew I could with one blow had deactivate my assailant
35 on 28 August 2020 but I remained passive, the first requirement to be able to suddenly respond.
36 However, a Coles staff member intervened and by this ended the assault incident.
37
38 I had no fear knowing what I could do but obviously it scared the living daylight out of my wife
39 that I was violently attacked and she now fears to leave the house. After all the videos on the
40 internet shows the police to attack persons also.
41
42 In my view this attacker simply was convinced that every person MUST wear a mask and my
43 calm explanation to check the website of the Department of Health simply was ignored. I also let
44 him record my details of my blog so if he, as he indicated he had done so already, report me to
45 the Victorian Police if he held I was in violation of the law. At no time did I use any
46 inappropriate language toward him. It is when I was walking away (after all I had frozen items in
47 my trolley and didn’t want it to defrost) he started to attack me. As such, he appeared the kind of
48 person to be that you must submit to his demand or face violence.
49 Even when he was twisting my arm I ignored the pain because I was ready to deactivate him if
50 he ignored the staff member who was urging/demanding him to let me go.
51
Page 6
1 It never should have come to this that violence erupts because some person is driven by fear that
2 someone without a mask somehow could perhaps kill him by transferring COVID-19.
3
4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMoNcvVPekg
5 Sol’s Interview with the Victorian Police after being arrested
6 AUSTRALIA'S BRAVEST MAN (And he's 77 years old) Police Interview
7
8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwsjG4BV45I
9 Fear Pandemic
10
11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uogfwxSA104
12 Your Rights - No more Lockdown
13
14 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ROYUId2ZzI
15 An interview of Solihin Millin by Dr Barry Mcinerney of Youtube Channel Lundove
16
17 While we cannot condone anyone to apply violence on the other hand we also ought to try to
18 understand that the way this fear is not just promoted but pursued, including the police attacking
19 persons, smashing car windows and even shooting into a car, may underline that ordinary
20 unlettered person or even lettered persons may not be aware that this display of constitutional
21 terrorism should never be resorted to by any government and/or their agencies.
22 Obviously if anyone was to violently attack my wife I could not then remain passive as I would
23 not hesitate to deactivate such an attacker immediately.
24 But really, it never should have to come to that. The Government and its authorities should avoid
25 such condition to be eventuating in the first place.
26 .
27 Even if the Victorian Police were not to charge Mr Solihin Millin the damage has already been
28 done this is because the video of his arrest itself may be an enforcement that the police arrest was
29 justified. Yet Mr Solihin Millan may very well have a “medical condition” that could be relied
30 upon, if he desired to do so. After all the police ordinary are not medically qualified to ascertain
31 if a person has a “medical condition” or not.
32 Neither that as I understood it the police had not within the provisions of the Biosecurity Act
33 2015 (Cth) any authorisation to question and/or apprehend a person.
34 One could hold that the police are walking in a “legal minefield” where its conduct can be
35 deemed unlawful for various reasons.
36 And IBAC being in place to so to say “supervise” the conduct of authorities/government may
37 very well lack any “QUALIFIED IMMUNITY” where it failed to act in a appropriate and
38 reasonable manner where it could have done so.
39 .
40 I am not aware (albeit it might not have been shown on any video but may have been stated) any
41 police officer at the start making known to their targeted person to have an order issued within
42 the legal provisions of the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and they seek to enforce this.
43 In my view if they failed to follow proper legal requirements then whatever followed cannot be
44 legally justified.
45
46 https://9now.nine.com.au/today/coronavirus-melbourne-retail-staff-within-rights-to-refuse-
47 entry-to-people-not-wearing-face-masks/e77b7ba8-89c8-401b-afb5-d2cef3422f17
48 'Human rights have nothing to do with being asked to wear a mask'
49
50 This is a gross deception peddled around as again “self harm” cannot be acceptable as a
51 condition of entry and as such any condition that implies a person to engage in self-harm is a
52 violation not only of a persons human rights but also his/her constitutional rights.
53
Page 7
1 When our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was debated the Framers of
2 the constitution embedded a legal principle in our constitution that all rights in the USA
3 constitution with its then 14Amendments were also in our constitution.
4
5 What is the 14th Amendment due process clause?
6 The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is exactly like a similar provision in
7 the Fifth Amendment, which only restricts the federal government. It states that no person
8 shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Usually, “due
9 process” refers to fair procedures.Mar 25, 2013
10
11
12 Brady Rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
13 www.law.cornell.edu › wex › brady_rule
14 What is a Brady rule violation?
15 That's a violation of the Brady doctrine, based on a 1963 Supreme Court ruling that requires them to disclose
16 any information favorable to the defense. When prosecutors withhold evidence they are duty-bound to turn
17 over, they undermine the Constitution, the Supreme Court's case law, and the premise of justice.Apr 25, 2018
18
19 Brady disclosure - Wikipedia
20 wikipedia.org › wiki › Brady_disclosure
21 People also ask
22 What constitutes a Brady violation?
23 Greene (U.S. 1999): Held that a Brady violation occurs when: (1) evidence is favorable to exculpation or
24 impeachment; (2) the evidence is either willfully or inadvertently withheld by the prosecution; and (3) the
25 withholding of the evidence is prejudicial to the defendant
26
27 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule
28 In other words, the defendant must prove that there is a “reasonable probability” that the outcome of the
29 trial would have been different, had the evidence been disclosed by the prosecutor. See Kyles, 514 U.S.
30 at 433 (1955). Bagles and Kyles Court further defined the “materiality” standard, outlining the four
31 aspects of materiality. First, the “reasonable probability” of a different result is not a question of
32 whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence,
33 but whether the government’s evidentiary suppression undermines the confidence in the outcome of the
34 trial. The second aspect is that it is not a sufficiency of evidence test, and the defendant only has to
35 show that the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different
36 light as to undermine the confidence in the verdict. Third aspect is that there is no need for a harmless
37 error review, because a Brady violation, by definition, could not be treated as a harmless error. Fourth
38 and final aspect of materiality the Kyles Court stressed was that the suppressed evidence must be
39 considered collective, not item by item, looking at the cumulative effect to determine whether a
40 reasonable probability is reached. See Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-438.
41
42 Real evidence - Citizens Information
43 www.citizensinformation.ie › justice › real_evidence
44 Search for: What is considered real evidence?
45 What is a Brady list Police?
46 Against this backdrop, the LASD here compiled a so-called “Brady list,” consisting of names and
47 serial numbers of deputies whose personnel files contained sustained allegations of misconduct
48 that could subject the deputies to impeachment in a prosecution.Aug 26, 2019
49
50 Due Process of Law - Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor | Exhibitions ...
51 www.loc.gov › exhibits › due-process-of-law
52 Search for: What is due process of law Magna Carta?
53 What are the two due process clauses?
54 No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. While the clause in
55 the Fourteenth Amendment says: ... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
56 without due process of law.
57
58 Sixth Amendment | U.S. Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal ...
Page 8
1 www.law.cornell.edu › constitution › sixth_amendment

2 Search for: What does the 6th Amendment say?
3 What rights do people accused of crimes have?
4 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial
5 jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been
6 previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be ...
7
8 https://emergencylaw.wordpress.com/2020/07/27/policing-the-public-health-response-via-
9 facebook/#comments
10 QUOTE
11 COVID-19, Criminal law
12 Policing the public health response via Facebook
13 Date: July 27, 2020Author: M. Eburn12 Comments
14 We’ve probably seen the videos of people being belligerent with Victoria police and
15 shop staff – and if not, here are some:
16  Melbourne woman threatens to sue police who questioned her for not wearing
17 mask news.com.au (26 July 2020);
18  Woman films herself refusing to wear a face mask in Victoria shopping centre
19 during argument with police 7 News (27 July 2020); and
20  Bunnings mask woman seen arguing with Australia Post staff in new video
21 9News, (27 July 2020).
22 END QUOTE
23
24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfzw5DyNLsY
25 7NEWS Update - Wednesday, August 12: 21 COVID-19 deaths in ...
26 11 Aug 2020 ... Watch 7NEWS nightly at 6pm and weekdays at 11:30am and 4pm on ... Coronavirus:
27 Investigation launched over anti-mask arrest | 7NEWS.
28
29 https://www.heraldsun.com.au/coronavirus/melbourne-woman-who-refused-to-wear-mask-films-herself-
30 threatening-to-sue-victoria-police/news-story/ae5393262bae9ed8b8f52426a4cf97c6
31 Anti-mask Karen: Chantal Watergate demands Dandenong police ...
32 28 Jul 2020 ... A woman who was arrested after failing to wear a mask and provide her details ...
33 Coronavirus: Melbourne "Karens" refuse to wear face masks ... Ms Rose claimed on 7 News she had a letter
34 stating she could travel ... Victoria Police are investigating the incident and could fine Ms Black $1600 for
35 the breach.
36
37 Regardless if a person is an anti-masker or not it is totally irrelevant when the person for health
38 reasons objects to impose “self-harm”
39 And if a person were to decide not to wear a mask as not to inflict “self harm” and made a photo
40 of herself it hardly can be an offence. As after all one cannot be committing a crime in pursuing
41 to enforce once constitutional rights. Even if a business insist in wearing a mask and the person
42 upon entry removes it then nevertheless the condition of entry has been satisfied. Numerous

Page 9
1 businesses have a sign that one must wear a mask to enter. Not about to “remain”. Besides that in
2 my view this condition cannot be legally enforced.
3
4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhfoiRbjCqQ
5 WANTED: Elizabeth 'Lizzy' Rose for Taking a Photo Without a Mask ...
6 13 Aug 2020 ... WANTED: Elizabeth 'Lizzy' Rose for Taking a Photo Without a Mask in Bunnings!
7 $10,000 Fine/Reward! 23,505 views23K views. • Aug 13 ...
8
9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqozNzPsBXA
10 WANTED Elizabeth 'Lizzy' Rose for Taking a Photo ... - YouTube
11 13 Aug 2020 ... WANTED Elizabeth 'Lizzy' Rose for Taking a Photo Without a Mask in Bunnings!
12 $10,000 FineReward! Watch later. Share. Copy link. Info. Shopping. Tap to unmute. If playback doesn't
13 begin shortly, try restarting your device.
14
15 And getting back to the Brady issue, did the police at the time inform the Court it may not have
16 any order issued by a person medically qualified authorised to issue such an order against
17 Mandy Crerar as required within the provisions of the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth)?
18
19 https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/magistrate-smacks-down-victorian-antimasker-mandy-
20 crerar/news-story/68b9590042cbd302fffad44772ab8761
21 Magistrate smacks down Victorian anti-masker Mandy Crerar
22 A magistrate has blasted an anti-masker who claims laws don’t apply to her, saying the
23 virus doesn’t care if she’s a “sovereign citizen” or not.
24
25 One also has to consider:
26 https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-rates-
27 or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
28 Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do Not Lead to Reduced COVID Transmission Rates or Deaths , New
29 Study Suggests
30
31 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/no-medical-evidence-to-support-police-s-totalitarian-approach-in-
32 melbourne/ar-BB18vt8s?ocid=msedgdhp
33 No medical evidence to support police’s ‘totalitarian approach’ in Melbourne
34
35 And we obviously then come to this issue also:
36 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/brisbane/father-reveals-horrifying-reason-he-believes-his-son-took-his-
37 own-life/ar-BB18v2M1?ocid=msedgdhp
38 Father reveals horrifying reason he believes his son took his own life
39
40 I have loads of articles/videos about these issues referred to above, and perhaps unlike most
41 other persons I work on setting up a legal case long before it even exist.
42 As such, even if my writings are ignored over time in the end I have (as I proved in past
43 litigation) been able to use past writings and show the blatant ignorant of reply, etc. And when an
44 opposing party then submitted for an adjournment so as to be able to reply I successfully
45 opposed it as after all the opponent had ample of time to respond.
46
47 I now ill quote the COMPLAINT that I understand is now being investigated by A Sgt
48 Mansfield.
49
50 QUOTE 28-8-2020 complaint
51 Kim French 28-8-2020
52 Senior Sergeant 25942 I Greensborough Police Station
53 email: kim.french@police.vic.gov.au
54 phone: 8432 0200 l fax: 8432 0232

Page 10
1 address: 167-171 Grimshaw Street Greensborough 3088 | DX 211842

2 COMPLAINT Re ASSAULT
3 Kim,
4 I today Friday 28 August 2020 at about 15.38 was physically attacked by a man in a green
5 T-short at Coles Warringal Shopping centre. Coles staff member Trent subsequently intervened
6 to have this man letting my arm go, which this man was twisting.
7 The incident: I was near the freezer compartments and just had placed icecream containers into
8 a special bag and placed it in my trolley when I noticed this man (in green T-shirt) was
9 commenting about what I had in my trolley. He then was what appeared to me making pictures
10 of me with my trolley, and commented he was calling the police. I was not the least worried
11 about him calling the police at all as I know my legal rights and so I ignored that comment and
12 didn’t respond to this at all. If he did call the police it may be on record. He then subsequently
13 commented that I should purchase a mask. I made known I didn’t need to. He then started to
14 claim it was the law, he was at that time as it appeared to me, filming me on his mobile. I
15 explained he could go to my blog (and even showed my business card for him to film it, this so
16 he could check out details of my blog address) and check out details explained at it, and also
17 explained that he did better to check the website of the Department of Health. He argued that it
18 was “the law” that one had to wear a mask. I explained it was not and when I was walking away
19 he run a trolley into me and kept doing so. I tried but never succeeded in making a picture of the
20 man assaulting me but he then grabbed my left arm twisting it and demanding to have my
21 mobile. I refused. So he started to twist my arm however then store staff member Trent
22 intervened to make clear he had to let my arm go. I then left to the check out, served by Anna.
23
24 I made a complaint to a woman with the name tag “Alexis” who I was told was in charge of
25 Coles, but she made clear that it was not a matter for Coles but for the police.
26 I then noticed the man to come at the check out where Anna was serving and was able to make a
27 partial image of him which I have included, wearing a green shirt. I understand from Coles that
28 they have a camera at the check outs and so that camera could show a better image of the person
29 and what he purchased. This, as then if he paid by card then Coles records will show which card
30 he used for those purchases and so his identity can be verified.
31 At no time did I hit him, neither in any way was violent towards him. Any cameras in the aisle
32 where the ice-cream is on display will show exactly what eventuated.
33
34
35
Page 11
1 While some persons may become emotional about issues, nevertheless it cannot and must not
2 justify them to take the law into their own hands when in fact they are not whatsoever enforcing
3 any laws but merely what they may perceive to be the rule of law.
4
5 As A-Sgt of Victorian Police (Preston) on 10 August 2020 was able to establish that I actually
6 have a valid medical certificate not to wear a mask for medical condition, this even so the
7 Department of Health website makes clear no medical certificate is needed.
8
9 I did suggest to the person in charge of Coles that they should place a sing that mask wearing is
10 not compulsory as to try to avoid problems.
11 I am a senior citizen and while I was able to get away my concern is that another senior citizen
12 may end up severely injured or even dead. Hence, I view this person acting violent must be
13 appropriately held legally accountable for his extended assault upon me first by attacking me
14 with the trolley and then subsequently grabbing my arm and twisting it trying to rob me of my
15 mobile. Again the only image I had from him was later made at about 15:54pm (which might
16 have been about a minute later as It seems my mobile is about a minute out from my computer
17 time) nevertheless the approximate time was just after I was served at 15:52 at Register 005 by
18 Anna.
19 For the record, I did not ask him and neither gave consent for him to physically attack me.
20
21 If this person is so violent against a senior citizen then I view urgent action is required to prevent
22 him for doing to onto others before someone becomes seriously injured or even killed.
23
24 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
25 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
26 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

27 (Our name is our motto!)
28 END QUOTE 28-8-2020 complaint
29
30
31 https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19#exceptions-for-not-wearing-a-face-covering
32 QUOTE 14-8-2020 Victorian Department of Health website
33 I have a medical condition that prevents me from wearing a face covering, do I need
34 a medical certificate stating I don’t need to wear a face covering?
35 You do not need a medical certificate stating that you have a lawful reason for
36 not wearing a face covering. If you have a lawful reason for not wearing a face
37 covering, you do not need to apply for an exemption or permit.
38 If you are stopped by police, they will ask you to confirm the lawful reason you are
39 not wearing a face covering.
40 Do I have to wear a face covering if I have asthma?
41 People with asthma or people who have a medical condition that includes problems
42 with their breathing, do not have to wear face coverings.
43 END QUOTE 14-8-2020 Victorian Department of Health website
44
45 I had at the time a valid medical certificate, which has now been replaced with a new medical
46 certificate, that for medical conditions I do not have to wear a mask, etc.
47 Obviously I do not need to carry around a bunch of copies to hand out to whomever may have an
48 issue with that I do not wear a mask.
Page 12
1 .
2 In my view a major problem is that a person like Mr Michael Eburn, PhD and Barrister at
3
4 https://emergencylaw.wordpress.com/2020/07/27/policing-the-public-health-response-via-
5 facebook/#comments
6 COVID-19, Criminal law
7 Policing the public health response via Facebook
8
9 is making statements to purport the reflection of the rule of law, which I view are miss-conceived
10 and amount to disinformation where he makes statements which I view are or may be
11 “slanderous”, etc, and by concealing certain posts that may not be to his liking/approval and as
12 such give a misconception what the rule of law really is about.
13
14 QUOTE 20200831 post
15 Mr G. H Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. says:
16 August 31, 2020 at 6:20 pm
17 Your comment is awaiting moderation. This is a preview, your comment will be visible
18 after it has been approved.
19 Re physical assault!
20 QUOTE
21 We’ve probably seen the videos of people being belligerent with Victoria police and shop
22 staff – and if not, here are some:
23 END QUOTE
24 As I understand it “A belligerent is an individual, group, country, or other entity that acts in
25 a hostile manner, such as engaging in combat”.
26 I checked a video of Karen at Bunnings and upon entry she was asked for a medical
27 certificate, which Karen correctly pointed out was not for them to ask.
28 https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/face-coverings-covid-19#exceptions-for-not-wearing-a-face-
29 covering
30 QUOTE 14-8-2020 Victorian Department of Health website
31 I have a medical condition that prevents me from wearing a face covering, do I need a
32 medical certificate stating I don’t need to wear a face covering?
33 You do not need a medical certificate stating that you have a lawful reason for not wearing
34 a face covering. If you have a lawful reason for not wearing a face covering, you do not
35 need to apply for an exemption or permit.
36 If you are stopped by police, they will ask you to confirm the lawful reason you are not
37 wearing a face covering.
38 Do I have to wear a face covering if I have asthma?
39 People with asthma or people who have a medical condition that includes problems with
40 their breathing, do not have to wear face coverings.
41 END QUOTE 14-8-2020 Victorian Department of Health website
42 As such I view your labeling of a person who had a medical condition and even a medical
43 certificate was inappropriate.
44 While out Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) has embedded in it
45 POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY including FREEDOM OF SPEECH you by
46 deleting my postings have gone about to deny this. Like many tech companies you seem to
47 select what suits you.
48 What we therefore have is that those who read your articles and post that you allow to be
49 shown can have a misconception to reality.
50 I on 28 August 2020 was physically attacked by a person (about 1/3 of my age) because I
51 was not wearing a mask. Store staff came to my aid. I have now placed this in the hands of
Page 13
1 the Victorian Police as there was a recording of the incident. This man carried on and on
2 about it was “the law” and even so I calmly explained it was not the law, he when I decided
3 to move on, commenced to physically attack me. I have ongoing “medical conditions” and
4 have actually medical certificates for this to exempt me but I do not need to walk around to
5 hand out copies to whomever. Neither do I actually have any legal obligation to obtain a
6 medical certificate but do so just in case. In my view you are one of those persons who by
7 one-sided publications may cause misconceptions by readers that somehow there are no
8 medical exemptions. Even those who come from war torn countries and for who a mask
9 can be traumatic are excluded from wearing one. My 87 year old wife has a heart condition
10 and other medical conditions and her specialist has made clear she doesn’t need a medical
11 certificate because by law this is not required as her medical condition in itself is sufficient
12 that she cannot wear a mask. However, as my wife made clear if the assault had been upon
13 her it could have ended inn her death and so she now refuses to leave the house even for
14 medical treatment in fear someone may attack her, as after all the police have done so
15 repeatedly even on persons who had medical exemptions. You may cite the legal
16 provisions as much as you desire but they are only legally enforceable if they are applied in
17 the correct circumstances. The Victorian Parliament provided for the legislative provisions
18 for a declaration of STATE OF EMERGENCY and STATE OF DISSASTER, however
19 they cannot violate any Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) provisions. Hence, they cannot be
20 applicable to COVID-19 “man-kind” diseases. Obviously I pursue criminal charges against
21 the person who unprovoked attacked me but I will also make known to the court that I view
22 a website article and posting like you have concealing certain posts is by this one sided,
23 and may cause a person or persons to misconceive what is legally applicable.
24 It may not excuse this person unprovoked attack as he might not even have been aware of
25 your article and refusal to allow certain posts to be seen by readers but in the overall I view
26 it is essential that those who use the internet providing alleged legal views may by
27 concealing certain post cause misconceptions.
28 Prior to his unprovoked attack I even suggested to him to check the Department of Health
29 website to get a better understanding what was or was not legally applicable. I even showed
30 him my details on a business card he recorded on his mobile so he could check details.
31 However, it was clear that no matter what it was his firm belief that it was “the law” that
32 everyone must wear a facemask. In fact that was what the Victorian Police on 10 August
33 2020 also claimed when ordering me to leave a shopping centre for not wearing a mask,
34 this even so they had checked my medical certificate and held it was applicable as to the
35 time period it showed.
36 Referring to a person being “belligerent” where in fact this “Karen” as I understand her
37 name is from onset correctly pointed out that they couldn’t ask her for a medical certificate
38 (albeit I also have watched a video where she showed her medical certificate) then clearly
39 there is a gross misconception/misunderstanding to what is legally applicable.
40 I am aware you can continuously conceal my postings, but I keep copies of my posts and
41 will if required proved them to the court.
42 While I pursue prosecution against the attacker I do view the court should also be given the
43 understanding why such a person may have misconceptions/misunderstandings as to the
44 application of the rule of law.
45 My advise to you is, to not use the internet for articles and other postings if you have a
46 problem to accept any posts that may not align to your views. In my view your blog (if I
47 can call it that) is therefore miss-informative by concealing certain posts.
48 For what it might be relevant: I once was visiting a property that during the night was
49 attacked by a petrol bomb. I became a police witness. When the attacker was before the
50 Court I was required to give evidence in view that I had earlier spoken with this person via
51 telephone, albeit I was not an intended victim. I then raised during my evidence that in my
Page 14
1 view this person had sounded as if he was intoxicated, albeit I was not an expert to state he
2 was. The court then asked the Police Prosecutor if the defendant had been intoxicated. The
3 Police Prosecutor then denied this. The Court then made known to temporary adjourn the
4 hearing to listen to the tape recording of the police interview. After the court resumed it
5 made clear it would have imprisoned the accused was it not because of my evidence as the
6 recording indeed proved to the court that this person acted while intoxicated and therefore a
7 more appropriate sentence was to be required a program. After the hearing the now
8 convicted legal representative came to me and thanked me for my honesty. I explained I
9 had sworn to tell the truth, and did so. Years later this convicted person saw me in the street
10 and called me over and he explained that since the program he no longer drank alcohol and
11 still thanked me for my honesty as a witness.
12 Whenever I over decades cross-examined witnesses I always held it critical I would ensure
13 that the witness reflected the truth and not just a one sided version.
14 It may not excuse the attacker to have unprovoked physically assaulted me I understand
15 that the mantra by the police, the government and persons like yourself to conceal what
16 really is applicable may cause a derangement by some people that they misconceive the
17 rule of law.
18 In my view those who fail to provide relevant details are concealing the truth and in that
19 regard can be very dangerous when others who are unlettered person may assume that
20 whatever is claimed is as such applicable.
21 I do not accept that there is anything “belligerent” about a person to pursue their rightful
22 constitutional and other legal rights. And lawyers are generally appearing at the bar table to
23 pursue their clients rights as the law is truly applicable, regardless if some opponent may
24 claim otherwise. Surely that doesn’t make a lawyer to be “belligerent” to pursue his/her
25 client, even if the court may or may not in the end accept this lawyers submissions?
26 I on 8 April 2020 already commenced with a formal complaint to the Victorian
27 Ombudsman, later referred to Victorian IBAC, as I then already realized that soon or later I
28 and others may end up being physically attacked. Hence, I sought to avoid this eventuating.
29 In my view persons like you who by refusing to allow certain posts are concealing the truth
30 and are part of the deception to readers who then may seek to take the law into their own
31 hands. I refer to CAMPBELL v CHRIS FLORIAN; DAVID TATARSKY and Ors
32 https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/196417.P.pdf in which the court made known that
33 about 50% of lawyers are losing their cases. This regarding “QUALIFIED IMMUNITY”
34 regarding which I wrote an article:
35 “QUALIFIED IMMUNITY” can only protect those who are conducting matters within the
36 rule of law, not despite of it. Meaning officials such as any Premier, police officer, etc, who
37 are acting in violation may be sued in private capacity.
38 This document can be downloaded from:
39 https://www.scribd.com/document/473700980/20200826-Press-Release-Mr-G-H-Schorel-
40 Hlavka-O-W-B-Issue-The-Lack-of-Qualified-Immunity-for-Premiers-to-Be-Sued
41 Do not overlook that where I posted an article and you held it was not correct in law than
42 you could always have commented upon it. As such, for your readers you could have
43 clarified anything I had in your view stated that was in violation of the rule of law. If you
44 do not take that opportunity then this in my view cannot excuse you to conceal my post
45 from your readers and by this cause misconceptions. In my view using the term
46 “belligerent” was or could be perceived to be “slanderous”, etc, where a person acted
47 within constitutional and other legal rights.
48 There are various other parts of your statement/blog that I view are incorrect, but this posts
49 is already long enough and so will not add them, save to say no store/business can insist
50 that a person to commit self-harm as a condition of entry or be denied entry.
51 I view your conduct to be deplorable, sowing miss-information/disinformation by making
Page 15
1 certain statements not reflecting the true application of the rule of law and the manner you
2 conceal certain posts!
3 END QUOTE 20200831 post
4
5 Regardless if one is a so-called “anti-mask” protester or not in the end what must apply is what is
6 in all the circumstances legally applicable. Violence to enforce a (miss-)perceived view never
7 can be deemed acceptable. The miss-/disinformation peddled by so many is what may
8 underline the violence now perpetrated against law abiding citizens.
9
10 As the Department of Health makes clear the police can “ask” for a “lawful” reason however that
11 is the end of it. As such, if a person states “medical condition” then that is sufficient in regard of
12 the Department of Health statement. No need to elaborate upon this. A person may have an
13 embarrassing condition and hardly would be going to make this known to whomever, after all
14 this is why one has the confidentiality of the medical profession. Neither are the police or others
15 medically qualified to make a proper medical assessment of a person claim to have a “medical
16 condition”. And in any event the police shouldn’t even bother any person unless they have a
17 order issued within the legal provisions of the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and even when it
18 comes to the 9 residential high-rising complexes at Flemington, etc, any order by the State health
19 official would have been without legal force if not in accordance with the legal provisions of the
20 Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth).
21
22 Rather than IBAC going on about COVID-19 it should make this a matter of extreme urgency as
23 indicated above there are also people committing suicide and hence the longer this al goes on the
24 more persons are likely to die needlessly.
25

30 END QUOTE 20200831-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC ex C-VO 20-6752-Re PHYSICAL ASSAULT
31
32 QUOTE 20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC COMPLAINT against Assistant Commissioner
33 Luke Cornelius
34 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission 1-9-2020
35 Address: GPO Box 24234, Melbourne VIC 3001
36 Telephone: 1300 735 135
37 Email: info@ibac.vic.gov.au
38
39 20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC COMPLAINT against Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius
40
41 THE ELEBORATE FRAUD PURPETRATED BASED ON A HOAX
42 Sir/Madam,
43 at a time that there is much in dispute about COVID-19 issues the last thing we need
44 is the Victorian Police and others to be blinded by the dust of the dispute between opposing
45 parties. In my view the Victorian Police must remain to be impartial and strictly deal with legal
46 issues. So to say throwing fuel on the fire is only going to add more problems.
47
48 Top Victorian police officer lashes ‘tinfoil hat brigade’ in virus fight
49 David Rode <rodewinsone@hotmail.com>
50 Mon, 31 Aug at 10:50 am
51 QUOTE
52 When will Victoria's virus infections fall below 100? Soon, the CHO predicts
Page 16
1 A senior Victoria Police officer has hit out at “bat s–t crazy” people thumbing their noses at coronavirus
2 rules and peddling dangerous conspiracy theories. Assistant Commissioner Luke ...
3 thenewdaily.com.au
4 END QUOTE
5 As I ended up being the victim of a physical attack (not wearing a mask, while having a medical
6 certificate on “medical grounds”) I view that Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius comments
7 are inflammatory and totally uncalled for. The fact that he allegedly claimed that the “police
8 were sick of dealing with “so-called sovereign citizens” may underline if anything his lack of
9 understanding what is actually legally applicable, this as our Commonwealth of Australia
10 Constitution Act 1900 (UK) placed citizens to be the “sovereign citizens” who only by
11 referendums can amend any constitution.
12
13 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
14 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
15 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people
16 through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence of
17 any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any act
18 which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free
19 Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the
20 freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their
21 representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of
22 securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than
23 that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect
24 the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference.
25 Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the
26 daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of
27 freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every
28 one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the popular
29 liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have made their
30 work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an
31 Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; an d,
32 therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will
33 determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should be dealt
34 with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all courts in the states that
35 choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free:
36 next, that its government shall be by the will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly,
37 that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a
38 court appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its
39 provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the
40 Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but
41 it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the
42 Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
43 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of
44 this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow
45 degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the
46 guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense,
47 the court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a
48 tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of
49 constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the
50 sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done
51 well.
52 END QUOTE
53
54 HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
55 QUOTE
56 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of parliamentary
57 sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark on federation we throw
58 parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer supreme. Our parliaments at present
59 are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They have not only the power of legislation, but the
60 power of amending their constitutions. That must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary
Page 17
1 sovereignty. No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the
2 power of changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
3 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of being vested in
4 one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary sovereignty is dispensed
5 with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring into existence a powerful judiciary
6 which towers above all powers, legislative and executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter
7 of the constitution.
8 END QUOTE
9
11 QUOTE
12 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 Therefore while politicians and their agencies and the police may desire to pretend otherwise in
16 reality no constitutional amendment is valid unless approve by the “sovereign citizens” by way
17 of referendum.
18 Hence, where a purported constitution such as the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975
19 was never approved by a State referendum than it is no constitution at all, merely a socalled
20 Act of Parliament. The original Victorian colonial Constitution 1955 (as amended by the
21 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is and remains to be in force. It is then
22 that in my view Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius is the “Tin Hat Foil” person.
23 While there may be certain persons who may misuse the term “sovereign citizen” for ulterior
24 purposes that doesn’t mean that a Assistant Commissioner ought to scandalise all and every
25 “sovereign citizen” merely because it may suit his rhetoric and his political views.
26
27 The Hyperlink of this article is https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/state/vic/2020/08/28/victoria-police-virus-
28 measures/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=PM%20Extra%20-%2020200828
29 QUOTE
30 A senior Victoria Police officer has hit out at “bat s–t crazy” people thumbing their noses at coronavirus rules and
31 peddling dangerous conspiracy theories.
32 Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius said police were sick of dealing with “so-called sovereign citizens” and the “tin-
33 foil hat” brigade, who are against masks and vaccinations and believe 5G causes coronavirus.
34 END QUOTE
35 “It’s just crazy,” he said. We also have this statement “A senior Victoria Police officer has hit out at
36 “bat s–t crazy” people thumbing their noses at coronavirus rules and peddling dangerous
37 conspiracy theories.”. In my view this labelling of “bat s–t crazy” also is in my view
38 inflammatory and totally uncalled for.
39 QUOTE
40 “It’s bat-s–t crazy nonsense.”
41 A clearly frustrated Mr Cornelius spoke out after a 76-year-old man was arrested and charged with incitement on Friday,
42 after a police investigation into a planned rally against Melbourne’s Stage 4 virus restrictions.
43 “Participating in this proposed protest would be a serious and blatant breach of the chief health officer’s directions and it
44 jeopardises the health of the entire community,” he said.
45 Mr Cornelius said the protest, planned for September 5, carried a serious risk of undoing the hard work of the vast
46 majority of Victorians through weeks of restrictions.
47 “The tinfoil hat-wearing brigade are alive and well in our community,” he said.
48 “They’re taking every opportunity to leverage the current situation to serve their own ridiculous notions about so-called
49 sovereign citizens, about constitutional issues and about how 5G is going to kill your grandkids.”
50 Police have also been cracking down on a daily protest in suburban Melbourne, with hundreds of people gathering in and
51 around a reserve in suburban Dandenong.
52 Since Monday, police have made nine arrests and handed out 48 fines at the Dandenong protest.
53 There has been a heavy police presence at a daily protest against lockdown measures in Melbourne this week. Photo:
54 AAP
55 Mr Cornelius said people were trying to play the “innocent card” when approached by police and wasting their resources.
56 “That’s why this behaviour is so selfish,” he said.
57 The protest is also illegal under Melbourne’s lockdown.

Page 18
1 The police frustration came as Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton said he expected daily COVID cases to fall
2 below 100 next week – and possibly even as soon as this weekend.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 Web Results
6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin_foil_hat
7 Tin foil hat - Wikipedia
8 A tin foil hat is a hat made from one or more sheets of aluminium foil, or a piece of conventional headgear
9 lined with foil, often worn in the belief or hope that it ...
10
11 https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tinfoil%20hat
12 tinfoil hat - Urban Dictionary
13 Tin Foil Hat, also tinfoil hat, or tfh, a general term for a piece of headgear made from one or more sheets of
14 tin foil, aluminium foil, or other similar material.
15
16 https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/tinfoil-hat/
17 tinfoil hat – Dictionary.com
18 tinfoil hat. or tin foil hat [tin-foil hat]. What does tinfoil hat mean? Government trying to control your mind ...
19
20 https://www.businessinsider.com/origin-of-the-term-tin-foil-hat-2013-6
21 Origin of the term 'tin foil hat' - Business Insider
22 12 Jun 2013 ... Saying someone is "wearing a tin foil hat" or "is a tin foil hat" means that they have paranoia
23 or a belief in conspiracy theories, especially involving ...
24
25 https://www.amazon.com.au/Accoutrements-Tin-Foil-Conspiracy-Theorists/dp/B07CXZBRW5
26 Archie McPhee Tin Foil Hat for Humans: Accoutrements: Amazon ...
27 A Tin Foil Hat is a necessity of modern life. One of the most irritating parts of being under constant, long-
28 distance electronic thought observations is having to ...
29
30 https://www.yellowoctopus.com.au/products/tin-foil-hat-for-humans-ultimate-brain-protection
31 Tin Foil Hat For Humans (Conspiracy Theorists) : Archie McPhee ...
32 TIN FOIL HAT FOR HUMANS - ULTIMATE BRAIN PROTECTION Are you worried that aliens or secret
33 FBI satellites may be penetrating your skull and harvesting ...
34
35 https://www.businessinsider.com.au/origin-of-the-term-tin-foil-hat-2013-6?r=US&IR=T
36 The True Origin of the ‘Tin Foil Hat’ And Why It’s The Stupidest Thing To Wear If You’re Paranoid About
37 The Government
38 Micheal Kelly JUN 13, 2013, 7:13AM
39 QUOTE
40 The recent revelations that the NSA has been collecting the detailed phone records of Americans since 2001
41 has a lot of citizens saying that claims the NSA operates a vast domestic dragnet have been vindicated.
42 Others think the news has led those to “tin foil hat” types to come out in spades.
43 Saying someone is “wearing a tin-foil hat” means that they have paranoia or a belief in conspiracy theories,
44 especially involving government surveillance or paranormal beings.
45 Originally, the term referred to the practice of wearing headgear consisting of metal foil to block mind-
46 reading.
47 Julian Huxley, brother of “Brave New World” author Aldous Huxley, coined the concept in his 1927 work
48 “The Tissue-Culture King“:
49 “Well, we had discovered that metal was relatively impervious to the telepathic effect, and had prepared for
50 ourselves a sort of tin pulpit, behind which we could stand while conducting experiments. This, combined
51 with caps of metal foil, enormously reduced the effects on ourselves.”
52 Unfortunately for contemporary tin foil hat wearers (sometimes referred to simply as “tin foil hats”), a 2005
53 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that the metal hats actually amplify certain radio
54 frequencies instead of blocking them.
55 From the study (emphasis ours):
56 It has long been suspected that the government has been using satellites to read and control the minds of
57 certain citizens. The use of aluminium helmets has been a common guerrilla tactic against the government’s
58 invasive tactics.
59 Surprisingly, these helmets can in fact help the government spy on citizens by amplifying certain key
60 frequency ranges reserved for government use.

Page 19
1 The findings led the authors to “speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for
2 this reason.”
3 Now that’s a tin foil hat conspiracy theory!
4 END QUOTE
5
6 We also have this statement “A senior Victoria Police officer has hit out at “bat s–t crazy” people
7 thumbing their noses at coronavirus rules and peddling dangerous conspiracy theories.”. In my
8 view this labelling of “bat s–t crazy” also is in my view inflammatory and totally uncalled for.
9 Is he claiming COVID-19 is not from bats? (Not that I pursue this kind of claim either way.)
10 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) within which in Section 106 of
11 the Constitution the States were created “subject to this constitution” then all legal principles for
12 so far applicable to the States are restricting the States also.
13 The constitution provides that there shall be a representative of the Crown who shall provide for
14 an executive (government) which shall act within relevant legislative provisions. It also provides
15 for a legislator (Parliament), a judicature (Courts) as well as for an Inter-State Commission.
16 While the latter is not part of a State powers the others are. The Letters Patent published in the
17 Victorian Gazette 2-1-1901 in fact provides for the Governor to appoint judges for an “impartial
18 administration of justice”. VCAT by this fails to be within this provision.
19
20 As was recently reported that Premier Daniel Andrews allegedly attended during curfew hours to
21 Tullamarine where reportedly 21 passengers planes arrived not loaded with passengers but with
22 carton boxes loaded with surveillance equipment apparently from China. Also, Premier Daniel
23 Andrews engaged in a Belt and Road Initiative this even so “external affair” falls within the
24 domain of the Commonwealth. And as I reported during the STATE OF DISASTER and
25 CURFEW somehow Premier Daniel Andrews has road crews working on an alternative road
26 referred to as the North East road link (NELA) which I view clearly isn’t any sort of emergency
27 to be done in a declared disaster. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that persons are “bat s–t crazy”
28 or “Tin Foil Hat” wearers where they can and do rely upon factual details.
29
30 One may ask; Where was Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius when there was this massive
31 BLM protest in Melbourne? How many did he pursued to be fined for violating his alleged
32 rules? Why is he going on about a 76 year old man on his own exercising his constitutional
33 rights while not about the many thousands of protestors in the BLM protest?
34 Is he some “Tin Foil Hat” person who beliefs that BLM protesters are shielded by their “Tin Foil
35 Hat” from any COVID-19 disease?
36
37 As I indicated above we have a certain constitutional structure and implied a separation of
38 powers. As was made clear by the UK courts when Prime Minister Boris Johnson had pursued to
39 prorogued the Parliament the court held that this was unconstitutional (even so it unlike the
40 Commonwealth of Australia has no written constitution) as a Parliament must serve to supervise
41 the Government in a time of crisis. Which was deemed BREXIT then was. Yet, we have the
42 Victorian Legislative Assembly having been suspended during a time of this claimed COVID-19
43 crisis. That is not some “Tin Foil Hat” conspiracy claim it actually eventuated.
44
45 But wait there is more!
46 Within our constitutional structure within which the States also must operate, the separation of
47 powers means that only the legislature can legislate and it alone can suspend legislation. While
48 the Victorian Parliament purportedly legislated that a Minister can suspend legislation at will
49 this cannot be constitutionally applicable. A Minister within the framework of a Parliament is
50 like any other Member of Parliament and cannot dictate anything to deny other Members of
51 Parliament their rights. Hence a Minister acting as a Minister of the Crown in the Executive
52 cannot dictate which laws are or are not applicable. That is a task that is with the Parliament and
Page 20
1 it cannot delegate this to a Minister. The Parliament within its legislation can delegate executive
2 powers but not legislative powers. After all, if a Minister could so to say overrule Parliament
3 then it would create dictatorship/tyranny as then the Premier could dictate to suspend any
4 elections and be permanently Premier, never again to be faced with an election. He could
5 permanently suspend both Houses of parliament and never be held accountable to any
6 Parliament. As such, in my view any legislation that purports the Minister (whomever) to
7 suspend legislation is simply null and void and cannot be enforced.
8
9 Our democratic system is that we elect Members of Parliament but we do not elect who shall be
10 in Government. While perhaps Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius may wear a “Tin Foil
11 Hat” that somehow some unelected person in the department of health may dictate what and how
12 Victorians and others may conduct themselves within the State of Victoria or even leave the
13 State in reality this is another of misconception/misunderstanding. Reality is that a person within
14 the Department of Health may exercise certain delegated powers however may not unduly
15 interfere with a persons constitutional and other legal rights. Hence, the right of any person to
16 exercise his/her political and religious rights cannot be interfered with.
17
18 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
19 Australasian Convention)
20 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
21 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and
22 the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in
23 this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the
24 peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
25 END QUOTE
26 And
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the
30 people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta
31 for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole
32 history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of
33 Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new
34 charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Again:
39 QUOTE
40 Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of
41 the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under
42 it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-
43 the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
44 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of
45 this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow
46 degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the
47 guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the
48 court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as
49 will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of
50 constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere
51 of the Commonwealth.
52 END QUOTE
Page 21
1
2 Therefore the right to protest is a “political liberty” that cannot be denied. For sure, any person
3 engaging in violence/rioting cannot be deemed to exercise his/her constitutional rights of
4 protest, this as one can only lawfully exercise once constitutional rights when permitting others
5 to do so likewise and to let them have their constitutional rights otherwise.
6
7 Because our constitution also was based in part upon the freedoms of the U.S.A constitutional
8 provisions with its 14 Amendments then existing I therefore very much follow USA court
9 decisions.
10 I recall that in about March 2020 President Trump made clear that ultimately he is responsible as
11 the head of the Administration (Government) and he listen to all advisers and then make his
12 decision. That I view is applicable also within our constitutional system. It is in the federal level
13 the Governor-General who actually is the head of the government and has his Ministers advising
14 him and acting on his behalf. In Victoria the same system applies, that the Governor is the head
15 of the government and the Ministers are her advisors.
16 .
18 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES:
19 The resolutions conclude:
20 An executive, consisting of a governor-general, and such persons as may from time to time be
21 appointed as his advisers, such persons sitting in Parliament, and whose term of office shall depend
22 upon their possessing the confidence of the house of representatives expressed by the support of the
23 majority.
24 What is meant by that is simply to call into existence a ministry to conduct the affairs of the new nation as
25 similar as it can be to the ministry of England-a body of constitutional advisers who shall stand as nearly as
26 possible in the same relation to the representative of the Crown here [start page 27] a her Majesty's imperial
27 advisers stand is relation to the Crown directly. These, then, are the principles which my resolutions seek to
28 lay down as a foundation, as I have already stated, for the new super structure, my object being to invite other
29 gentlemen to work upon this foundation so as to best advance the ends we have in view.
30 END QUOTE
31
32 Both in Federal and State environments the Minister are answerable to the respective Parliament
33 as “responsible Ministers” as they must be “supervised” by the Parliament as to their conduct.
34 After all if a Minister were to exceed his/her delegated powers then the Parliament can sanction
35 this Minister.
36
37 While we had Prime Minister Scott Morrison claiming that there is a “National Cabinet” reality
38 is there is no “National Parliament” to overseas such alleged “National Cabinet” and as such it is
39 not at all any structure within constitutional context. Just ask yourself is a Premier accountable to
40 the Federal Parliament and/or the Prime Minister accountable to a State parliament? Surely this
41 kind of system isn’t possible. The Commonwealth represents the interest of the States within
42 those matters confined to it by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and
43 as such the Prime minister must but out of any matters relating to state legislative issues.
44 Likewise the States cannot interfere with any commonwealth legislative provisions.
45 .
47 QUOTE
48 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the Commonwealth
49 legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
50 END QUOTE
51
53 QUOTE

Page 22
1 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the states will
2 nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
3 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

4 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws will, however,
5 remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of making these new laws will be
6 all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
7 END QUOTE
8
10 QUOTE
11 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
12 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
13 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
14 the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Any so called “National Cabinet” is in my view a treasonous conduct as it seeks to overthrow the
18 constitutional systems provided for in the constitution.
19
20 If Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius desires to be some “Tin Foil Hat” person thinking
21 that he can shield himself from what is constitutionally appropriate then well I view he is in the
22 wrong job.
23
24 It is neither a wild conspiracy to hold that the registration of the Commonwealth of Australia as a
25 corporation with the District of Columbia, as the State of Victoria also did, is some conspiracy
26 theory by “Tin Foil Hats” because it is a reality that such registration exist. And as the States are
27 created within Section 106 of the constitution “subject to this constitution” then it too is bound
28 by Section 44 provisions!
29
30 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
31
32 44 Disqualification
33 Any person who:
34 (i) is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a
35 subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power;
36 or
37 (ii) is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced,
38 for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for
39 one year or longer; or
40 (iii) is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
41 (iv) holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the
42 Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth; or
43 (v) has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the
44 Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an
45 incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
46 shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of
47 Representatives.
48 But subsection (iv) does not apply to the office of any of the Queen’s Ministers of State for the
49 Commonwealth, or of any of the Queen’s Ministers for a State, or to the receipt of pay, half pay, or
50 a pension, by any person as an officer or member of the Queen’s navy or army, or to the receipt of

Page 23
1 pay as an officer or member of the naval or military forces of the Commonwealth by any person
2 whose services are not wholly employed by the Commonwealth.
3
4 It is clear that Premier Daniel Andrews by his involvement of the Road and Belt Initiative
5 committed himself to a foreign power which violates Section 44 provisions.
6 As a matter of fact any Minister who adheres to the conditions of the corporation registration
7 with the District of Columbia by this automatically is excluded to be a Member of Parliament,
8 this as it violates s44. After all the District of Columbia falls under the direct legislative powers
9 of the Senate of the US congress. And we cannot have that Australian electors are denied their
10 right to elect representatives where those representatives are curtailed by whatever the US
11 congress may dictate.
12 Likewise with the United Nations (UN) no Minister can enforce any UN decision merely
13 because the UN made such a decision!
14
15 Hansard2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates;
16 QUOTE Dr. QUICK.-
17 The Constitution empowers the Federal Parliament to deal with certain external affairs, among which
18 would probably be the right to negotiate for commercial treaties with foreign countries, in the same way as
19 Canada has negotiated for such treaties. These treaties could only confer rights and privileges upon the
20 citizens of the Commonwealth, because the Federal Government, in the exercise of its power, [start
21 page 1753] could only act for and on behalf of its citizens.
22 END QUOTE
23 .
25 QUOTE Mr. THYNNE:
26 I shall quote from Mr. Dicey's recent work, which is very clear in its language. He says:
27 One of the characteristics of a federation is that the law of the constitution must be either legally
28 immutable or else capable of being changed only by some authority above and beyond the ordinary
29 legislative bodies, whether federal or state legislatures, existing under the constitution.
30 END QUOTE
31
32 Therefore, while the Commonwealth (not the states) can enter into treaties the cannot be
33 enforced unless the Commonwealth already had existing legislative powers. This also as
34 otherwise the Commonwealth could absorb or make incursions of State legislative powers
35 merely by engaging in treaties by backdoor manner. Hence the alleged NOW (New World
36 Order) is beyond our constitutional system can cannot have any legal validity.
37 .
38 While Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius may desires to be some “Tin Foil Hat” carrier
39 ignoring what is constitutionally applicable it nevertheless will in the end not protect him.
40 .
42
43 114 States may not raise forces. Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State
44 A State shall not, without the consent of the Parliament of the Commonwealth, raise or maintain
45 any naval or military force, or impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to the
46 Commonwealth, nor shall the Commonwealth impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to
47 a State.
48
49 The Victorian Police is as I understand it a registered corporation and as such not part of the
50 “Government” and hence its creation of a private armed force I view is unconstitutional.
51
53
Page 24
1 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion

2 The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any
3 religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall
4 be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
5
6 Hence, I view the State government while it can legislate as to business hours and also about
7 criminal issues it can however not otherwise deny a person to exercise his/her religious fait or
8 non-religious faith
9
10 WELSH v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 333 (1970), 398 U.S. 333, WELSH v. UNITED STATES,
11 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 76.,
12 Argued January 20, 1970, Decided June 15, 1970
13
14 1. The language of 6 (j) cannot be construed (as it was in United States v. Seeger, supra, and as it is in the
15 prevailing opinion) to exempt from military service all individuals who in good faith oppose all war, it
16 being clear from both the legislative history and textual analysis of that provision that Congress used the
17 words "by reason of religious training and belief" to limit religion to its theistic sense and to confine it to
18 formal, organized worship or shared beliefs by a recognizable and cohesive group. Pp. 348-354.
19 2. The question of the constitutionality of 6 (j) cannot be avoided by a construction of that provision that is
20 contrary to its intended meaning. Pp. 354-356.
21 3. Section 6 (j) contravenes the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by exempting those whose
22 conscientious objection claims are founded on a theistic belief while not exempting those whose claims are
23 based on a secular belief. To comport with that clause an exemption must be "neutral" and include those
24 whose belief emanates from a purely moral, ethical, or philosophical source. Pp. 356-361.
25 4. In view of the broad discretion conferred by the Act's severability clause and the longstanding policy of
26 exempting religious conscientious objectors, the Court, rather than nullifying the exemption entirely,
27 should extend its coverage to those like petitioner who have been unconstitutionally excluded from its
28 coverage. Pp. 361-367.
29
30 And;
31
32 http://www.vaccineinfo.net/exemptions/relexemptlet.shtml
33 Hints for Religious Exemptions to Immunization
34 Please read the text below before you download, print, or use the sample religious exemption letter and support materials
35 provided in the following link:
36 Sample Religious Exemption Letter and Supporting Documentation
37 Refer to the statutes. The laws require that immunization must conflict with the tenets and practices of a
38 recognized or organized religion of which you are an adherent or member. However, the law does not
39 require you to name a religion at all. In fact, disclosing your religion could cause your religious
40 exemption to be challenged.
41
42 And
43 Some schools and daycares attempt to require you to give far more information than required by law.
44 You are not required by law to fill out any form letters from a school or daycare. The law allows you to
45 submit your own letter and the letter only needs to meet the bare requirements of the law. Keep it simple; do
46 not feel you need to describe your religious beliefs here as that also is not required by law.
47 And
48 Many times, when a school or day care questions your exemption, they are merely unfamiliar with the
49 law or trying to coerce you to go against your beliefs by deliberately misrepresenting the law. They are
50 betting on the fact that you don't know your rights.
51
52 The Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) stipulates a legal process and
53
55
56 117 Rights of residents in States

Page 25
1 A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability
2 or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen
3 resident in such other State.
4
5 Border closures therefore are unconstitutional when it relates to the movement of any citizen,
6 albeit states may close borders regarding products that it may consider a hazard to itself.
7
8 As I wrote in the past while a STATE OF EMERGENCY and/or STATE OF DISASTER may
9 be declared such as for a bush fire it cannot be used for a “MAN-KIND” disease.
10
11 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
12 Convention)
13 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
14
15 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
16 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
17 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
18 END QUOTE
19
20 Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) and Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius may desire to carry his
21 “Tin Foil Hat” pretending that he is not bound by Commonwealth legislation reality is that he is.
22 Actually for that also all Ministers and their agencies, such as the Department of Health. And the
23 Victorian Police are also bound to respect and comply with those legislative conditions.
24
25 I clearly have since at least 8 April 2020 pursued various avenues and indeed provided IBAC
26 with many copies of my writings, but to no avail.
27
28 https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-and-mask-mandates-do-not-lead-to-reduced-covid-transmission-
29 rates-or-deaths-new-study-suggests/
30 Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do Not Lead to Reduced COVID Transmission Rates or Deaths, New Study
31 Suggests
32
33 I have indicated at various occasions that more than likely it might be a bacterium who like with
34 the Legionnaires Disease may be a local infection. After all, while COVID-19 is a disease and
35 can be harmful it is not the claimed KILLER DISEASE, as pathologist are making clear. While
36 it might be a contributing factor by escalating the existing health issues the person already had it
37 is not in itself a deadly disease.
38
39 Let me give a simple example:
40
41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQN44kjrSQ
42 Virus Not As Infectious as We Think, 80-90% of Family ... - YouTube
43 1 Aug 2020 ... 'Virus Not As Infectious as We Think, 80-90% of Family Members of Patients Do Not
44 Contract COVID'. The Wire.
45
46 Reportedly “Estia Aged Care Facility in Ardeer” has an about 300% infection rate this while
47 Professor Dileep Mavalankar Director Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, explains how he
48 researched medical reports from all over the world and that when a member of the household has
49 COVID-19 then 80 to 90% of other members of the household are unlikely to get infected with
50 COVID-19. Unlike with nursing-homes in family environment husband and wife sleep together,
51 engage in sexual intercourse, kissing, not wearing a mask, not social distancing, and despite all
52 this only about 10 to 20% are infected. Not just in India but this is from medical reports from
53 around the world.
54
Page 26
1 https://youtu.be/LfeN68Zp-TY
2 Revealing! Forensic Pathologist Professor Klaus Püschel pulls no punches.
3 QUOTE
4 Ten days ago in an interview with a major newspaper, you said that you hadn’t had a single case of COVID-
5 19 on your dissection table. Not one had died from the illness COVID-19 alone without another pre-
6 existing condition. Is that still the case? – Yes that remains the case. All [COVID-19] deaths for this region
7 Which have now passed 100, have been autopsied, and each one had serious pre-existing diseases.
8 END QUOTE
9
10 It has been reported that the ABS allows a death certificate to show COVID-19 even so the
11 person merely was “suspected” to have died from COVID-19 without any attempts to actually
12 establish this. This kind of “Tin Foil Hat” conduct may suit Assistant Commissioner Luke
13 Cornelius and others to exercise extra ordinary (albeit unconstitutional) powers by them wearing
14 “Tin Foil Hats” pretending that the constitution doesn’t apply to them but this conduct is what
15 really jeopardize and indeed places in danger the lives of many.
16 .
17 Many, like my 87 year old wife (with her heart failure and other medical conditions), are denied
18 proper medical support for allegedly protecting the elderly from becoming victim of COVID-19.
19 Excuse me is my wife at 87 not an elderly? How on earth is the suffering caused upon her by this
20 alleged STATE OF EMERGENCY and/or STATE OF DISASTER conditions going to save a
21 single life in a nursing home? It are “Tin Foil Hats” persons who are ignoring reality and blame
22 others for conspiracy theories instead of accepting they are the very culprits placing the lives of
23 the vulnerable in jeopardy that are the once who should be held legally liable. It are them who
24 are the very “bat s–t crazy” they accused other of.
25 If COVID-19 was some sudden disease then how on earth could anyone have previously
26 registered patents regarding this disease? Yes, the vaccinations are reportedly existing with
27 patents relating to them but may not as yet be used if alternatives are available.
28
29 While it is claimed that the Greens will support an extension of the STATE OF EMERGENCY
30 for 6 months, reality is that it can not be used for any “man-kind” diseases. As such it
31 essentially is I view an abuse of powers and this then undermines the very purpose for which the
32 STATE OF EMERGENCY ought to be used. As citizens may become ignorant to the ongoing
33 STATE OF EMERGENCY when as indicated when it comes to create some new road somehow
34 all the restrictions are not important.
35
36 As I wrote about in the past QUALIFIED IMMUNITY cannot be applied when someone act in
37 violation of the rule of law.
38
39 CAMPBELL v CHRIS FLORIAN; DAVID TATARSKY and Ors
40 https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/196417.P.pdf
41
42 While Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius may claim others to “peddling dangerous
43 conspiracy theories” in my view he is rather one of the many doing so. After all, if the number of
44 deaths are mere fabrication regarding COVID-19 and yet this somehow is used to justify
45 (unconstitutionally that is) to blatantly violate citizens constitutional rights and subject them to
46 constitutional terrorism while the very vulnerable person allegedly being protected are cause to
47 suffer more in various ways, then I view he is the one “peddling dangerous conspiracy theories”!
48 Let him provide the details as to how many autopsies were carried out to prove that those
49 claimed to have died from COVID-19 actually did so, and not merely it is a fiction of the mind.
50 COVID-19 is a disease but as was made clear by pathologist it is not the KILLER DISEASE and
51 the focus ought to be on why people are claimed to have died from COVID-19 if they were not!
52 What really then caused their deaths? Only then the “Tin Foil Hat” carriers ignoring pathology
53 evidence may concern themselves to the real issues and actually try to save lives. It may just
54 shows that those “bat s–t crazy” persons claiming COVID-19 disease was caused by bats may
Page 27
1 just have to realise that it may not have been at all, but I doubt that Assistant Commissioner Luke
2 Cornelius “peddling dangerous conspiracy theories” may himself view to be protected by a “Tin
3 Foil Hat” and so will continue to attack ordinary citizens their constitutional and other legal
4 rights. And that I view shouldn’t be tolerated.
5 Why indeed is it that most of the deaths are claimed to eventuate in nursing homes and not
6 amongst people of the same ages residing in their own homes? Is it that the compulsory
7 vaccinations in nursing homes is the real underlying cause of their death or considerably
8 contributes to it? What, if any safety test has been carried out to check if compulsory
9 vaccinations were not reducing the time span of life after vaccination? If not why not? And
10 obviously why have compulsory vaccination of residents where as many scientist and members
11 of the medical profession made clear that it merely undermines the persons (of that age) immune
12 system and has no real benefit for that person at all.
13 The issue should be what really is COVID-19 about, such as for example affecting a persons
14 ability to smell normally, and why are there clusters. Only by establishing what really may cause
15 COVID-19 and how it spread amongst residents and staff can we work on a conduct that will
16 actually deal with the underlying cause and problems and have real progress. Fraudulent claims
17 of COVID-19 may be financially beneficial to some and may be used by others to seek to justify
18 their reign of terror but should never be part of a democratic system. My writings over the
19 months have been to rely upon all kinds of articles and videos by scientist and qualified medical
20 persons and if Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius claims they are “peddling dangerous
21 conspiracy theories” then let him prove this. Not merely for him to use the “Tin Foil Hat”
22 principle to ignore the constitutional and other legal rights of citizens. I view he must be held
23 legally accountable and prove his (claims) side of the argument.
24 In my view Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius is the one who is “peddling dangerous
25 conspiracy theories” that others then may act upon it, and this endanger society as a whole.
26

31 END QUOTE 20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC COMPLAINT against Assistant
32 Commissioner Luke Cornelius
33
34 In my view it is not COVID-19 that caused that much disaster compared to how politicians their
35 agencies and the police have caused. HCQ was rubbished by Lancet only for it later to retract
36 both articles but too late. Never mind the people who lost their lives due to these bogus articles
37 that politicians decided to ban HCQ. We also have that the TGA reportedly is not doing any
38 safety testing/checking as it relies upon the honesty of the pharmaceutical companies. Well they
39 didn’t test for some 32 years and claimed vaccinations were all safe. How many of those who
40 allegedly died of COVID-19 may have died due to the vaccinations they had which accelerated
41 their deaths? I view that at the very least a moratorium ought to be put in place that any
42 vaccinations that are not specifically authorised by a medical practitioner for a particular
43 person must not be permitted to be provided. Who really can trust TGA?
44


20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Royal Commissions Into Aged Care & Covid-19-Supplement 4

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

20200901-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Royal Commissions Into Aged Care & Covid-19-Supplement 4

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Page 1

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Telephone: 1300 735 135

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 www.law.cornell.edu › constitution › sixth_amendment

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

54 phone: 8432 0200 l fax: 8432 0232

1 address: 167-171 Grimshaw Street Greensborough 3088 | DX 211842

26 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

28 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

27 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 21 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion

1-9-2020 (Supplement 4) Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

29 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

47 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

Вам также может понравиться