Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOI 10.1007/s12205-011-0729-4
www.springer.com/12205
···································································································································································································································
Abstract
Correct estimate of curvature ductility of reinforced concrete members has always been an attractive subject of study as it
engenders a reliable estimate of capacity of buildings under seismic loads. The majority of the building stock needs structural
assessment to certify their safety under revised seismic loads by new codes. Structural assessment of existing buildings, by
employing nonlinear analyses tools like pushover, needs an accurate input of moment-curvature relationship for reliable results. In
the present study, nonlinear characteristics of constitutive materials are mathematically modelled according to Eurocode, currently in
prevalence and analytical predictions of curvature ductility of reinforced concrete sections are presented. Relationships, in explicit
form, to estimate the moment-curvature response are proposed, leading to closed form solutions after their verification with those
obtained from numerical procedures. The purpose is to estimate curvature ductility under service loads in a simpler closed form
manner. The influence of longitudinal tensile and compression steel reinforcement ratios on curvature ductility is also examined and
discussed. The spread sheet program used to estimate the moment-curvature relationship, after simplifying the complexities involved
in such estimate, predicts in good agreement with the proposed analytical expressions. Avoiding somewhat tedious hand calculations
and approximations required in conventional iterative design procedures, the proposed estimate of curvature ductility avoids errors
and potentially unsafe design.
Keywords: analytical solutions, concrete, curvature ductility, elasto plastic, reinforced concrete, seismic, structures, yield
···································································································································································································································
1. Introduction and Metin (2007) showed that the deformation demand pre-
dictions by improved Demand Capacity Method are sensitive to
The focus of earthquake resistant design of Reinforced Concrete ductility as higher ductility results in conservative predictions.
(RC) framed structures is on the displacement ductility of the Estimate of moment-curvature relationship of RC sections has
buildings rather than on the materials like reinforcing steel. been a point of research interest since many years (Pfrang et al.,
Critical points of interest are the strain levels in concrete and 1964; Carrreira and Chu, 1986; Mo, 1992); historically, moment-
steel, indicating whether the failure is tensile or compressive at curvature relationships with softening branch were first intro-
the instant of reaching plastic hinge formation (Pisanty and duced by Wood (1968). Load-deformation characteristics of RC
Regan, 1998). Studies show that the estimate of ductility demand structural members, bending in particular, are mainly dependent
is of particular interest to structural designers to ensure effective on moment-curvature characteristics of the sections as most of
redistribution of moments in ultra-elastic response, allowing for these deformations arise from strains associated with flexure
the development of energy dissipative zones until collapse (see, (Park and Paulay, 1975). As seen from the literature, in well-
for example, Pisanty and Regan, 1993). In areas subjected to designed and detailed RC structures, the gap between the actual
earthquakes, a very important design consideration is the ductility and design lateral forces narrows down by ensuring ductility in
of the structure because modern seismic design philosophy is the structure (see, for example, Luciano and Raffaele, 1988;
based on energy absorption and dissipation by post-elastic defor- Pankaj and Manish, 2006). With regard to RC building frames
mation for survival in major earthquakes (Paulay and Priestley, with side-sway, their response assessment is complicated not
1992). Many old buildings show their structure unfit to support because of the influence of second order deformations, but also
seismic loads demanded by the structural assessment requests of due to the fact that considerable re-distribution of moments may
the revised international codes (see, for example, Chandrasekaran occur due to plastic behaviour of sections. Plastic curvature is
and Roy, 2006; Chao Hsun Huang et al., 2006). Further, Sinan therefore a complex issue mainly because of interaction of various
*Associate Professor, Dept. of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India (Corresponding Aughor, E-mail:
drsekaran@iitm.ac.in)
**Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 21 via Claudio, 80125, Naples, Italy (E-mail: nunsci@unina.it)
***Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 21 via Claudio, 80125, Naples, Italy (E-mail: serino@unina.it)
****Visiting Researcher, Dept. of Structural Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 21 via Claudio, 80125, Naples, Italy (E-mail: fedcarran@libero.it)
− 131 −
Srinivasan Chandrasekaran, Luciano Nunziante, Giorgio Serino, and Federico Carannante