Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
DEEPTANGSHU KAR
SEMESTER- 5th
INTRODUCTION:
Sovereign immunity is essentially “A government’s immunity from being sued in its own
courts without its consent." Sovereign immunity has been enshrined under the British
Common Law principle of rex non potest peccare i.e. the king can do no wrong.
The concept finds its roots in the belief that that the King of England, who ruled by divine
right, could do no wrong. As a result, with certain narrowly defined exceptions, the courts
would not allow a lawsuit against the king. This concept of sovereign immunity was later
brought to the Indian colonies by the English settlers, and it became ingrained in our law as
well.
In its simplest terms, sovereign immunity is the immunity from suit enjoyed by government
entities. The early ideas regarding sovereign immunity had their philosophical underpinnings
in the writings of Bodin, Austin, and Hege.
“It is the distinguished mark of the Sovereign that he cannot in anyway be subject to the
commands of another.”
An attempt has been made in this paper to understand the history of this doctrine i.e. its
origin, understanding and applicability in earlier times, both in England and in India.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
HYPOTHESIS:
The researcher will seek to establish that doctrine of sovereign immunity has very distinct
trajectories in India and the UK and they do not intersect.
CHAPTERIZATION:
INTRODUCTION
DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN EVOLUTION: A PRIMARY UNDERSTANDING
JOURNEY OF DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN THE UK
JOURNEY OF DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN INDIA
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRAJECTORY OF EVOLUTION OF THIS
DOCTRINE IN THESE TWO COUNTRIES
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
BIBLIOGRAPHY